Intellectual Property in History | Stephan Kinsella

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 24. 07. 2024
  • Stephan Kinsella presented this sample lecture from the Mises Academy's latest online course, "Rethinking Intellectual Property: History, Theory, and Economics," which began on 1 November 2010.
    Register online, now: academy.mises.org/courses/ip-r...

Komentáře • 19

  • @EricFontaineJazz
    @EricFontaineJazz Před 13 lety +4

    The dogbarking is just great!

  • @slhines7
    @slhines7 Před 13 lety +2

    The dogs barking killed my concentration and focus:)

  • @UnhappyTestTubeBaby
    @UnhappyTestTubeBaby Před 13 lety

    @MrAlpruitt He did say its active 70 years after you die. But if you want to establish the total term of the copyright you have to count from the time of publication. He's summing the total term of a copyright for a hypothetical person, who owned a copyright during their lifetime and the copyright remained enforceable for 70 more years after that.

  • @MrAlpruitt
    @MrAlpruitt Před 13 lety

    @richardcadbury Could you give us a time where he can't do basic maths plz.

  • @grraadd
    @grraadd Před 13 lety

    I started from my grandparents who fought for freedom (they lost when FDR left them behind the lines), my father who was denied education because his father was "rich". What he learned studying anyway he passed on me. And - much later multilevel marketing and people like Robert Kiyosaki and many others.
    Obviously I had to get rid of indoctrination from public schools first...
    Ayn Rand? I just watched her films and interviews a year ago :-)

  • @joeseth05
    @joeseth05 Před 13 lety

    My stance on the argument of patentability is, that things shouldn't be patentable if they can potentially change on their own/reproduce themselves.
    A car can't reproduce itself, thus car should be patentable.
    Any kind of living being may reproduce itself, thus living beings shouldn't be patentable at all.
    Neatly, this argument also works for any kind of living or sufficiently intelligent beings, like AIs, ETs, Spaghetti Monsters etc...

  • @AustinW90
    @AustinW90 Před 13 lety

    The dogs are killing me.

  • @UnhappyTestTubeBaby
    @UnhappyTestTubeBaby Před 13 lety

    @MrAlpruitt It should be 130 years, I think. Publish at 30, die at 90. That's 60 years. Add 70 and that makes 130.

  • @MrAlpruitt
    @MrAlpruitt Před 13 lety

    @UnhappyTestTubeBaby I thought he said its 70 years when you die? This is what i mean by not understanding, I don't think i get it.

  • @HelpWakePeopleUp
    @HelpWakePeopleUp Před 13 lety

    Me too.

  • @MrAlpruitt
    @MrAlpruitt Před 13 lety

    @UnhappyTestTubeBaby Ah haaaaaa, Thankyou for the clarification : D

  • @slhines7
    @slhines7 Před 13 lety

    @anyusmoon1 Me too overall.

  • @joeseth05
    @joeseth05 Před 13 lety

    @ericfontainejazz woof!

  • @grraadd
    @grraadd Před 13 lety

    @synestheticmonotony In her interview she mopped the floor with that sleazy marxist whatever his name was, so I like her.
    But it would be very difficult to answer in depth to your comment because I don't know details of her life or who Hubbard is...

  • @MrAlpruitt
    @MrAlpruitt Před 13 lety

    So it should be 160 years (90 + 70)? What if were not understanding it properly? This also doesn't prove that he can't do basic maths. Just that he is capable of making mistakes. Even math teachers make mistakes. ^^

  • @mihaly1027
    @mihaly1027 Před 3 lety

    Woof

  • @AzoraX0
    @AzoraX0 Před 9 lety +2

    wth is with the dog

  • @Hanksand
    @Hanksand Před 13 lety +2

    not acceptable with dogbarking!

  • @LibertyJedi
    @LibertyJedi Před 13 lety +1

    The dog barking is a joke, at least take the time to shut the dog up or don't post crappy work, it says how far one can trust what you are saying.