MikroTik product news: CCR2004

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 9. 07. 2024
  • Take a look at the brand new CCR2004-16G-2S+. Like the previous model, this CCR also features the Annapurna Labs Alpine v2 CPU with 4x 64-bit ARMv8-A Cortex-A57 cores running @1,7GHz.
    But here’s the difference. This powerful router crushes all previous CCR models in single-core performance, and that is the most important aspect when it comes to heavy operations based on per-connection processing. Like queues, for example.
    0:00 - Intro
    0:21 - Specifications
    2:03 - Perfomance
    2:30 - Usage example
    2:55 - Passive cooled version
    3:53 - Power consumption
    4:07 - Conclusion
  • Věda a technologie

Komentáře • 65

  • @AI-xi4jk
    @AI-xi4jk Před 2 lety +12

    I love your products and prices and licensing! Stay awesome!

  • @RavingMad
    @RavingMad Před 2 lety +3

    It's a nice product, and I know it's impossible to satisfy everyone's desires, but this Router could've used a 5GbE nBaseT port in place of 3 of the 1GbE ports for each of the two switch segments. The bus to CPU would've supported it, and the router would've been more complete. This router for me would be absolutely perfect atm, if in addition to above it also had combo 10GbE RJ45 ports for each of the SFP+ ports. Still quite a nice product.

  • @lukasbruderlin2723
    @lukasbruderlin2723 Před 3 měsíci

    Glad you mention the typical power needed. Would it also be possible to tell some range of idle power?

  • @jonw1531
    @jonw1531 Před 2 lety +5

    Any chance we'll see a high end arm or x86 based 1072 replacement. Our head end is struggling and we're about to make the jump to juniper. We don't care what it costs but would like to stay with tik because we're so comfortable with it.

  • @danfisher9065
    @danfisher9065 Před 2 lety +17

    I’m surprised there’s no PoE out port.

    • @stasio1740
      @stasio1740 Před 2 lety +2

      At least one PoE out port will be great for acces point

    • @petervandebeek5980
      @petervandebeek5980 Před rokem +1

      PoE is for edge devices like AP's, and they should connect to switches, in my opinion.

  • @watanabemaxon1002
    @watanabemaxon1002 Před 2 lety +3

    I just buy CCR2004-16G-2S+PC and am very happy with it. It's very interesting that each of three models of CCR2004 has no switch chip directly handling the SFP+/SFP28 ports, the switch chip only connects Gbe ports. The port extender 98PX1012 on the XS Port model of CCR2004 seems not to perform full functions of the switch chip. So some switch function such as interface bonding for SFP+ ports might cost more CPU load on CCR2004 I guess?

    • @thegorn
      @thegorn Před rokem

      I guess at this price point people don't tend to bond 10GE. Anyway bonding can open up a new can of worms if hashing over the links doesn't go right (out of order packets). If you are bonding for redundancy instead of bandwidth then I think it's better to buy two routers and set them up as a VRRP pair which is what I do. Then you have full chassis redundancy, and staging upgrades is far less risky.

  • @AfifAhmad
    @AfifAhmad Před 2 lety

    Does it have high availability pairs?

  • @P3rad0X
    @P3rad0X Před 2 lety +4

    A CCR wit QSFP ports would be nice tho

  • @doubledomination7398
    @doubledomination7398 Před rokem

    Mikrotik best project for small buisneses is HEX S - good cpu performance, versatility, possibility of handling very heavy rules list for firewall, passive cooling and small size. For small buisness key features is L2TP+IPSEC conections for remote workers, advanced vlan config options and a cpu which can handle a lot of rules (some kind of permission access rules - some workers allowed only https and stuff, other workers have permission to use torrents, other people have discord access for example) I really want HEX S idea to go further

  • @jacksonhuff1042
    @jacksonhuff1042 Před 3 lety +2

    When will the passive cooling version be available?

  • @ronaldrobles5597
    @ronaldrobles5597 Před rokem

    QUERY ? A ccr2004-1G-12S+2XS SHOULD FAN THE EQUIPMENT WHEN TURNED ON OR WHEN THE EQUIPMENT OVERHEATS AUTOMATICALLY, DOES THE FAN ACTIVATE?

  • @webluke
    @webluke Před 2 lety +4

    8 POE+ with 8 Standard Gigabit ports would make this a solid small buisness router. That would allow for connecting Access Points and VOIP phones all in one unit. The 10G SFP+ is good though for connecting up to a 24-48 port switch.

    • @manhhkit
      @manhhkit Před 2 lety +2

      It is a router not switch. You should use switch to do poe

  • @thegorn
    @thegorn Před rokem

    I already have CCR1009 going strong but if they ever fail I'll grab these. When will RouterOS7 be stable for CCR1009? Currently it is in "testing" still for that platform (August 2022). Also, the performance comparison for CCR1009 vs CCR2004 seems be be with the former running RouterOS6 and the latter running RouterOS7. Are there any comparisons with them both running RouterOS7? The latest right now is 7.4.1. Thanks champs.

  • @cristioglice
    @cristioglice Před 2 lety +2

    Is there any news about CCR2004-16G-2S+PS?

  • @renansausen9574
    @renansausen9574 Před 2 lety +12

    We had problems with the first gen of CCR2004 and your support did nothing, that's sad!

    • @stasio1740
      @stasio1740 Před 2 lety

      Whats problems?

    • @renansausen9574
      @renansausen9574 Před 2 lety

      @@stasio1740 loosing routes and crashing.

    • @stasio1740
      @stasio1740 Před 2 lety

      @@renansausen9574 Ok thanks. Today i will stay with rb4011, but im looking for something with two sfp+ ports

    • @sliddjur
      @sliddjur Před 2 lety

      @@renansausen9574 RouterOS version? Are you talking about full BGP tables or simple small ospf configurations?

    • @renansausen9574
      @renansausen9574 Před 2 lety

      @@sliddjur just small iBGP tables, PPPoE and NAT, router OS was in the latest version by the time I tried to contact support.

  • @ousi00
    @ousi00 Před 2 lety

    When will we get the passive cooling version?

  • @Pabula
    @Pabula Před 2 lety +2

    Impressive router.... until i saw the fans, hope to see something fanless with bigger footprint case.

  • @gunnargu
    @gunnargu Před 2 lety +2

    How about fewer ports, like 3 sfp+ ... and maybe 1 LOW RPM fan, fanless is good but any air movement makes a huge difference, so why not a super low rpm fan, it could even turn off unless needed?

    • @thegorn
      @thegorn Před rokem

      Yeah it's like this thing can't decide if it's a router or a switch. I guess adding multiple 1G RJ45 has low marginal cost once the switch chip has already been purchased for the board.

  • @deafno
    @deafno Před 2 lety +5

    Need a router model with more 10G and 2.5G RJ45 ports.

  • @mjsun42
    @mjsun42 Před 2 lety +1

    Dear Mikrotik, where is the passive cooling version ? It has been more than a half year !!

  • @Hanesy
    @Hanesy Před 2 lety +4

    you look exhausted and was forced to make a video 😅😄👌

  • @sdklsdk-41258
    @sdklsdk-41258 Před 2 lety

    I purchased CCR2004 PC but not support POE-in. Other function is satisfy.

  • @Ashugite
    @Ashugite Před 2 lety +2

    using two of them getting randon reboots every 7-10 days already created a ticket but no response

  • @kalpakmukhopadhyay6461

    cool product as it is said to be the cheapest CCR router.

  • @Jon_Godfrey
    @Jon_Godfrey Před 2 lety +3

    I have no need but I really want this. Too much for my home network?

  • @testinghackstelugu1266

    Need a suggestion CCR1009-7G-1C-1S+ vs CCR2004-16G-2S+ which one is better for radius, with 500 static ip users

    • @mikrotik
      @mikrotik  Před 2 lety

      2004 Will be faster

    • @testinghackstelugu1266
      @testinghackstelugu1266 Před 2 lety +1

      @@mikrotik What about the issues mentioned in the comments, I am planning to buy this model, but bit confused with the bugs mentioned in the comments.

  • @msys3367
    @msys3367 Před 2 lety

    @3:45 when does the passive version be available?

    • @mikrotik
      @mikrotik  Před 2 lety +1

      it already is, contact your mikrotik distributor

  • @KonstantinovAG
    @KonstantinovAG Před 2 lety +1

    Switch chips with l3 hw offload ?

  • @ferdinandbardamu3945
    @ferdinandbardamu3945 Před rokem +2

    Mikrotik, take the CR2004-16G-2S+PC and make it have four 2.5Gbit ports + two 5Gbit ports + two SFP+ ports.

    • @thegorn
      @thegorn Před rokem +1

      Sounds good. I'd rather replace 16x 1Gbps ports with 6x 2.5Gbps ports.

  • @MaxPilloni
    @MaxPilloni Před 2 lety +1

    Ok, CPU performance, nice. How useful is this in a data center (or also for a normal core switch/very demanding access switch) compared to a multi-chassis configuration feature such as Cisco has with VSS or HPE/Aruba has with VSF?
    I'm trying latest available beta of Ros7 with MLAG but I really can't understand why I can't reach my swtiches anymore and I've written to Mtik support. But this function doesn't seems to fit this lack of feature (maybe can be nice mixed with VRRP but still not a way to see two chassis as one)

    • @Bisto17
      @Bisto17 Před 2 lety +3

      Its not a switch?

  • @curranhouse
    @curranhouse Před 2 lety

    Mikrotik need to have more poe plus switches

  • @ram64man
    @ram64man Před 2 lety

    I know it’s hard to design a switch but I look at this at can’t help but think it’s based on early 2000 3com switches

    • @Bisto17
      @Bisto17 Před 2 lety +2

      Except it's a router not a switch....

  • @zyxwvutsrqponmlkh
    @zyxwvutsrqponmlkh Před 2 lety +2

    Copper is for plebs. I need at least 9,000,000 sfp+ ports. Don't need spf56 yet, but give me a month or two and I may.

  • @ALEX-Macro
    @ALEX-Macro Před 2 lety +1

    Here is a big concern about the very small and un-upgradeable 128MB NAND storage in CCR2004. Is any reason giving such small storage?? That small NAND storage also probably limits the lifespan of the machine because once the NAND storage is overwritten exceeding its durability the whole machine would become a brick. You even provide 1GB storage on your entry-level product RB5009 so I really don't understand your product line strategy at all.

    • @mikrotik
      @mikrotik  Před 2 lety +1

      Most our devices have smaller storage. It is enough for routerOS

    • @thegorn
      @thegorn Před rokem

      @@mikrotik How many writes can NAND take?

  •  Před 2 lety +2

    Any news on random hangs/reboots? I have bought two of them and each suffers the same. You may call it impressive, I call it the shit.

    • @mikrotik
      @mikrotik  Před 2 lety +1

      But did you upgrade to 7.1 where the issues are fixed? If yes, email us with full details and console output taken during reboot, so we can see what caused it.

    •  Před 2 lety +1

      @@mikrotik ok, I will give it a try today. The last crash was on rc5 or something like that. What drives me mad is that this issue is not an acceptable reason for RMA.

    •  Před 2 lety +1

      @@mikrotik Looks like you have fixed some other issues and brought up some new ones. CCR 2004 on 7.1 now crashes during loading configuration... Great job. I have sent it to your support@

    • @testinghackstelugu1266
      @testinghackstelugu1266 Před 2 lety +1

      @ Hai Can I know is the issue resolved ? I am planning to buy this model.

    •  Před 2 lety +2

      @@testinghackstelugu1266 Hi, I've got this router up and running on RouterOS 7.2rc4 for at least a week without any issue with average traffic around 800Mbps

  • @T0NY0P
    @T0NY0P Před 2 lety

    poor sound quality

  • @JeevaDotNet
    @JeevaDotNet Před 2 lety

    external PSU, ugh *skip*