You act as if he can control his wife with a flick of his finger, though I will be honest i'm not sure when this event took place but If past events are being referenced, it's essential to consider the context and timeline, as people can't be held accountable for actions prior to their marriage. Let's not assume he controls her past, just as he shouldn't be blamed for it. Besides even if this is true it's unfair to assume she was objectified or exploited simply because she chose to participate in the pageant. It's important to respect her agency and not make assumptions about her experiences based on limited information, as Kirk's advocacy work suggests he is committed to promoting respect and dignity for all people
@@gabrielfrierson7080 he’s literally telling these women that because they show themselves online in lingerie they will never have a life partner. It’s a direct contradiction.
LOL women in pageants aren't inherently objectified or exploited? Especially when a lot of them are groomed from childhood? The women on OF Are much more likely to have completely consented to their job and not been groomed into it. Women 18+ controlling their objectification and actually being paid directly for it is much more inherently exploitative than starting in pageants with a face full of makeup at 4yrs old /s 😂😂😂
As a muslim, lived in muslim countries. I can confidently say that is a terrible analogy. The real problem is that terrible men exist everywhere irregardless of what they where.
@@muhammedaleem882 Also as a muslim, not true at all. lets not forget afghanistan or saudi. Lastly, OP wasnt talking about the culture or men, but the law itself.
@@KoiWrez I know he didn't talk about culture of men. That is what I was talking about. But I should've called them "muslim" countries. As I don't believe there is a single one left anymore.
Why is it a womans job to "lift up a man?" What happened to personal responsibility? Shouldn't conservative men be lifting themselves up? If they believe in personal responsibility, then they should.
"It's your job to make men better by allowing yourself to be subjected to their every whim and giving up your autonomy to them" it kinda makes me think of right wingers and how they view Ukraine. "Peace will come... if Ukraine just lays down and subjects to Russias dominion"
@@tannerpayne4384 They are part of the same sphere of influence and thought, any petty disagreements and quibbles they might have don't change that they're essentially preaching the same stuff.
If there is any inference about the the nature of men (cishet men obviously because Kirk has no interest in acknowledging anyone else) to be drawn from this video it's that maybe our deep inner Freudian id leads us to be resentful of women who don't want to let us use them as our own personal objects. Or at least Charlie seems to be giving us a case study of that right here. While I don't necessarily buy that theory as a general rule, I think there's a lot more to it than his explanation of what motivates us as men.
Do you actually know why it was the case? why they couldn't have a bank account or vote and if they would have rather been able to or not? I am curious to learn it from an expert like you.
@@maximecaron1969 Are you actually arguing that women don't want autonomy? They don't want to have financial control over their own lives? Don't want to vote and have a say in lawmaking and the future of this country? Are you...dumb? Or just a misogynist?
@@anticommie2132I pulled a rusty nail out of my foot and slipped on a banana peel the following day. It follows that the extra traction provided by the nail would have prevented slipping on the peel and should not have been removed.
@@BartlebyScrivener-oz6mk Is this a sad attempt at trying to be clever? Dunning Kruger is a real thing.... smh.... gulp down a few more psychedelics and pretend you understand the universe just a little more.
kirk thinks women are in charge of training me not to be a rapist? is that why i'm not a rapist, cuz some women forced me to learn not to assault women? i don't remember that happening.
Exactly. It's kind of sinister when you consider the only logical conclusion to having this belief is "rape is the woman's fault". Which is one of the worst things I have ever typed... thank god I do not believe it.
@@Dante3214 if you're referring to when he was asking if you'd be more or less respected depending on how much clothing you wear then you're being disingenuous. He's not saying it's the Woman's fault. He's saying that wearing less makes you more of a target for those types of degenerates. Not implicitly that it's their fault, the one committing the act makes that decision, but that by wearing less they will put themselves at risk. Be it because others think that more promiscuous clothing is a sign that they don't respect themselves and makes them less likely to fight back or for the simple fact that less clothing might turn said wrongdoers on. Either way it's not the woman's fault, but they are setting themselves up for failure. Especially in places with a high crime rate.
@@dr4ke338they're referring to 05:28 on wards - the abundance of skin and women needing to lift up men (by covering themselves up)in order for r@ pe not to happen... 😲😬🤫😱🤷♂️🤦♂️
@@dr4ke338 He said it in this video. The whole "Women need to train men to be civilized" so because men do shity things it's implied that women didn't civilized them enought to not do those things. And if he doesn't blame women that are dating men, he will blame the women that raised those men... I think Kirk needs to learn to use a washing machine and then talk about relationships.
It's not her responsibility but it does effect the outcome. Just as buying flowers for a woman and giving them massages make women treat us better. That's not inherently misogynistic. Everyone likes acts of kindness
These guys argue that "traditional" women stayed with their husbands because they were more virtuous, and "modern" women are ruined by feminism. They absolutely refuse to acknowledge that their mothers and grandmothers might've been MISERABLE in their marriages, but couldn't leave because of the institutionalized barriers against them. And then, OUT OF THE SAME MOUTH, they'll talk about getting rid of no fault divorce, getting rid of antidiscrimination laws, etc...basically anything to put those institutional barriers back in place. You know, the barriers they say never existed.
Actually part of the research that’s been done , many of these “feminist” that are now getting up there in age , have discovered that they would of much rather be in a relationship and have a family , rather than end up old , sad and alone, don’t take my word for it. Ask around for yourself , many women are wishing they would of ignore the stupid “feminist” movement (meaning the crap it has become) and wish they could of perhaps had been more submissive in a relationship and played the role
@@dannysolano4430 So there's research saying women regret feminism when they're older? I'd love to see that "research." Here's what you need to understand. Women don't choose to not get married because of feminism. If a woman chooses not to get married, it's because she doesn't want to be married. Women don't choose not to have children because of feminism. If a woman chooses not to have children, it's because she doesn't want children. The only role feminism plays here is that it gives women the power to CHOOSE. When they have that power, they make the choices that work best for them. Like me -- I'm a feminist. I'm also a married mother of 2 and I've been a full time homemaker for...22 years. That was my CHOICE. Sometimes people regret the choices they make. But they never regret having the right to make choices. No woman, not ONE, chose to remind childless because feminism told them to. Because feminism doesn't tell them to. If you don't get that, then maybe you need to "ask around" yourself. If you find a single woman who wanted to get married and have kids but didn't because of feminism, I'll eat my hat.
If being married means being someone like Charlie, I will be voluntarily celibate. Call me Father John cause I'd give myself to the lord before I accept that idiots ideologies
Intelligent, respectful, rich and not a sheep...... Yeah, don't matter, you might want to start that OF cause you're not getting married anyway, might as well say it's by YOUR choice! 😂
The way he spoke, he seemed to make the argument that men can't control their own urges and desires. This coming from a guy who probably touts "personal responsibility" when talking about poor people, or college graduates with loan debts.
@@rishabhanand4973It's actually pretty similar to their arguments, just with different conclusions. Both claim that the "male sexual nature" is depraved and predatory, but radfems/terfs conclude that all men/ masculinity/amab ppl are evil, while he/conservatives blame women/afab ppl as a concept. Pretty interesting. It's how radfems end up agreeing with conservatives on being anti-sex work/bdsm/etc.
Conservative men: "Life is all about rugged individualism and taking personal responsibility." Also conservative men: "I need a woman to be a surrogate mother to me and do everything for me because I'm too incompetent to do anything other than my job by myself."
Wait, aren't the liberals ones who are individualistic? From what I understand, conservatives place value in familiar and communal structure above the 'do whatever you want as long as you aren't hurting others' motto of liberalism
@@okramra Conservatism says that it's not the role of government, or society in general, to help you with your problems. All right wing ideology pretty much says this, including right wing libertarians. Liberals are a bit better about it, since they believe in at least some social safety nets generally, but the further left you go, the less individualism tends to become a thing. Because we live in a society and not in a bubble on our own, so that approach makes no sense.
@@Noooiiiissseee I agree with the further left you go notion, but I reject the statement that no right wing ideology is collectivistic. In fact the far right ideologies very much emphasize a strong state, strict societal norms and unity, totalitarianism and collectivism. None of those traits are individualistic.
@okramra But then, why are most Conservatives always speaking out against high tax rates (which were normal in the 1950s) and safety nets? That's the problem, I don't see any far-right conservatives talking about ensuring medical aid or education for all citizens, yet I simultaneously hear them belly-aching about what kids are taught in school?
coming from the crowd that says everything should be free! pay my student loan! pay my house. also we would like a ubi!!!! but we gonna complain that a guy want a wife to be wife material LOL you cant talk about "surrogate mothers" when you want the gov to be your mother. entitled brats lol
So I just did a 10 second Google search and found out Charlie Kirk married Miss Arizona 2012. This guy is rambling on about women showing less skin while he’s married to someone that did all that in 2012. The guys are ridiculous.
The audacity of Charlie Kirk claiming authoritative expertise on Any animals sexuality is the absolute definition of the Dunning Krueger effect. I didn't realize he was credentialed in biology, sociology, and anthropology. I'd really like to see those degrees, Charlie.
He doesn't have a degree but spends his time on College campuses basucally to outwit students and speak out against liberal indocrination in College. Really I don't recall personally being liberally indocrinated in College. The main issue which is never brought up in right wing circles is the outrageous cost of now going to College. I think its good for kids to go to school as it starts to breed independence from living at home. This is a problem that kids need to grasp to deal with real life that the right states they aren't ready for yet. Kids now get saddled in debt at an early age then we wonder why we have issues of people not able to buy homes or compete in the real world.
I also like how in addition to be being really hateful towards women. Charlie is also very degrading towards men. He thinks that it’s men’s nature to be sexually predatory which is a really disgusting. When the truth is that way of viewing women is taught and isn’t innate.
@@kingpinpasta2934 I disagree with Charlie on many things but I don't think he ever said that. He thinks in order to have a committed relationship, men in their prime should go for women in their prime as well.
@raymonddarhk20 This is a man with a receding hairline and is divorced. According to these characteristics, a woman would be out of her prime. Isnt he also out of his prime with this logic and if he is, who is he to talk about what women want?
Do you think Charlie Kirk even realizes how insulting he’s being to men in addition to women? Because I’m pretty sure his intention is to shame & degrade the latter, but he’s also dehumanizing the former.
@@martinpenwald9475 it's like a buzzword nowadays, unless you wanna give us a scale like what amount of Masculinity is good & anything beyond that is Toxic-Masculinity?
@@raymonddarhk20 you can be masculine and an egalitarian- charlie is not. toxic masculinity is self-serving and harmful to yourself and others. charlie is part of the problem yet refuses to see it, just puts it all on women... that's toxic masculinity.
"I don't agree with that at all" he says as hundreds of thousands of women who are victims of acid/assault/rape who are dressed modestly. It's literally denying that they exist or at least denying what happened to them, despite the facts
@@anticommie2132 YOU live in America, no one was talking about America but since you want to, my sentence still applies. Facts and statistics don't change because of your feelings dude, get over it
@seaofenergy2765 you don't know anything about the primal nature of man for one. It's especially apparent if you lack the comprehension skills to grasp what I'm saying, which is evident. Apparently explaining things that are basic common sense to you would be futile due to your indoctrinated minds! Therfore I will kindly excuse myself from being consumed by anymore of your intellectual fallacies! I hope communism works out for you comrades I wish you luck and godspeed!
I’m not really familiar with this little white Urkel guy, but he’s dressed like a low-rent restaurant magician and his thoughts are on the level of a junior high student.
The primary reason prostitution was outlawed in the US was because precisely that reason. Women were making money and with money came influence and power. The men around them couldn't tolerate that so there was a big push to outlaw prostitution but they masked it in moral arguments of the Christian variety.
@@SalinaBabba8343ty interesting. I'm currently watching Last Madam 2019/foreign film dubbed. Madam explains world as it is "To be born a woman is to be born a slave. To your husband, your mother-in-law, your children & your pimp. At least in here you can have some level of power." 1972/Some where in N.Y. city, John Lennon/Yoko Ono song "Woman is the n___ of the world" both gave me reason to pause...sigh/feel a little Mellon collie ☹️
The host of Whatever podcast is 39, he’s never been married, and has no kids. He’s said he wants a “trad wife” who’ll stay at home, cook, clean, raise their kids, and be totally financially dependent on him, yet he says he won’t enter a “legal marriage” because he doesn’t want to risk his wife divorcing him and taking everything. I don’t know his stance on pre-nups, but I’m assuming he wouldn’t want to sign one because he wouldn’t want his partner getting a single penny if she left him, despite insisting that she’s totally financially dependent on him. In other words, he wants someone he can control and who will feel trapped into staying with him. What a catch, huh? I wonder why no woman has snapped him up yet? Edited to clarify that there’s nothing wrong with being childless and unmarried at his age. I’m close in age to him and I’ve never been married or had kids. I mentioned it to point out the hypocrisy. He judges women for not being married or having kids by the time they’re in their 30s (he also shames younger women if they have kids because he clearly just hates women), yet he’s almost 40 and it’s fine for him because he’s a man.
That dichotomy is so funny to me “I want a traditional woman who will wait on me hand and foot, sleep with me whenever I want, do all of the cooking and cleaning, never work….but I’m afraid she will take all of my money and will try to get half in a divorce!1!1!1!!!!11”
I'm almost 34 and almost as much of a loser. I can see why he might have the impulse to blame someone other than himself, considering how rough a situation he probably has. Granted, my sexual frustration and loneliness doesn't have to become externalized into some nonsensical self-serving ideology. So for me it pisses me off a little to see them complaining. I have to deal with reality too, but I don't force others to deal with my reality.
Let alone any useful degree with field, real-world training for a profession that contributes to society. I don't count talking heads for right-wing, conservatives, spewing false talking points with no data or evidence, and misrepresent statistics on bad faith arguments as a real job.
@@cs-zz7jdthat’s what is called a logical fallacy. Appeal to authority. Just because he doesn’t have a degree doesn’t mean he can’t be educated. Hundreds if not thousands of lesser educated people were right about many aspects of covid without being “experts”
@@joshuaklimkowski9744That's not what appeal to authority means 😂 Would you rather a licensed doctor give you open heart surgery or the hospital janitor? Appeal to authority only applies when they authority is unrelated to the argument. Charlie gives life advice yet he has never had to actually work to build his life. That's a relevant point.
Definitely goes some way to explaining why he thinks women not having careers was totally unrelated to the low divorce rate in the 50s. "Who the hell needs a job anyway, I've never had one and I know pretty much everything!"
@@joshuaklimkowski9744 What are you going on about. He has a degree... it's just worthless. No one is saying that he isn't educated. It's just that his degree is worthless. Don't we love making fun of the blue hair'ed art major?
"Men want what they cannot see"?? Is he kidding? How many times have I heard certain types of men say "Well, she was dressed provocatively, what was she expecting?" in order to justify lack of sympathy for rape victims.
Well, what is the excuse when the victim is dressed non provocatively, fully covered with a heavy winter coat, gloves? Nevermind. It's always the woman's fault. I don't know what I was thinking. I should know by now it's never the insecure asshat's fault, that won't take "NO" for an answer.
The whole conversation is bullshit. People sexual preferences when it comes to being scandtily clad or in something less revealing is completely irrelevant to r*. R*ist look for thos they consider weak, defenseless or under their control, which is why it mostly happens between authority figures, such as family, and those they are close to. When it happens randomly, it's in a situation when the r*ist can momentarily take control of the victim. What victims are wearing, doing or look like is completely irrelevant to the r*it's motivation.
The irony is that it's the same logic that Islamic extremist's patriarchy uses to force their women to excessively cover themselves up and yet, you'll never catch Charlie Tinyface praise them for taking his argument to its logical conclusion.
There is also a large group of men who talk nonstop about women’s appearance in particular beautiful and/or thin women deserve more than ugly and/or fat women. So these men are very shallow and superficial and 100% care more about what they can see than what they cannot.
Not seeing the alleged man willing to take any "personal responsibility" here. They want the perceived respect as men with the unaccountability of children.
I find it funny how these dudes condemn women for doing OnlyFans but never seem to condemn the men for making onlyfans so profitable for women. If men didn’t spend their money on OF, then women probably wouldn’t do it. It’s almost like they are meeting a demand with a supply.
This whole "whatever" podcast is one big thirst-trap for incels who will hatejerk themselves raw from the combination of beautiful onlyfans girls and male misogyny
not just that. They didnt and dont, have a problem with actual porn sites. Many of which feature and popular vid category, show women being abused or filmed unknowingly. The difference with Onlyfans is women are safer doing their own content. Its something these con male pigs, dont profit from and cant find sick enjoyment in.
Because that’s the ONLY girl he’s ever had, or only girl that has ever had interest in him. And it’s only because he has money. He wouldn’t have her if he was broke.
@@princequestly2218 dudes tall, good looking and has money. he married an older woman because just look at the state of young women, evidence right there in the video
Well it is scientifically proven on average (there are exceptions to every rule) that men do indeed have a higher sex drive, this is down primarily to testosterone. In fact in women with higher than average (for women) testosterone levels (ie medical condition or taking performance enhancing drugs) it does increase sex drive. Also there seems to be a neurological difference in that a man’s sexual activity can be turned on or off like a light switch. While a female’s is more like a pathway of stimulation finally arriving at the end (hence the importance of foreplay to women when a dude can just ….head straight in if you know what I mean).
He specifically says "*Men's* primal carnal instincts". You're listening to this channel's F tier commentary instead of what he is saying. Not once does he say Women don't have those same carnal instincts.
@@dr4ke338you should read about othering. It’s a process where a strict binary is created with opposing traits of the two sides. People like Charlie Kirk think in this manner. Men do not equal women - therefore If men=strong women can not be strong If men=calculated women can not be that If men=one thing women are not that thing If he talks about a “primal nature” being repressed he implies a male connotation to that primal nature simply by consistently “othering” women. You can try it out in your own life and some of your own perceptions and you will find that humans, but especially white, cis, straight men, use “Othering” a whole lot. Charlie Kirk is a pundit and not even a good one, stop dickriding him for free.
@@dr4ke338 no but just like all other aspects of gender relations, he believes the man's primal instincts are superior and should be given deference at all times. That women should make those male drives their primary concern.
Women are not free therapists. This is ridiculous, why should she be expected to change herself when nothing is wrong with her AND fix the behavior of men.
Charlie Kirk is allergic to the idea of material conditions affecting peoples politics. "Women were happier in the 50's, just look at the lower divorce rates" 'women didnt get divorced in the 50's because they had no way of living without their husbands in the economic structure they were oppressed by' 'well thats just so far afield from the point idk where that came from'
I agree that diverse voices are crucial for marginalized groups, especially women. However, it's notable that Charlie Kirk often presents a lone perspective and yet consistently delivers thoughtful responses. I must admit, I'm impressed by his courage and intellectual acuity, which allows him to successfully articulate his arguments.
Can't fault him for shooting his shot. However, he must have had to lower his standards for asking out a pageant girl 10 years past her prime in her early 30's.
Mental gymnastics cooked Charlie Kirk's brain. When you are obviously wrong, and you know it, the internal struggle of trying to support terrible opinions and pass them off as fact cooks your brain. Just look at Tucker Carlson.
@@beejeeezy7933 Charlie Kirk is a married man who practices his Christian faith, which teaches that premarital sex is not acceptable. According to Christian beliefs, sexual intimacy is meant to be a sacred expression of love and commitment between two people who have publicly vowed to love and cherish each other in marriage, and premarital sex can undermine this commitment and cheapen its value.
Charlie Kirk’s head looks like a normal-sized head that got reduced in size by a shrink ray and is now riding around in a normal-head-sized prosthetic head.
This is in poor taste! Charlie Kirk has a serious and rare health condition, he was born without an anus, over the years his head has swelled with unexpelled excrement.
This podcast looks so surreal. There's like a dozen women, each with a mic, but only one of them is talking while the others look stone-faced and bored the entire time.
"You are getting off track." Charlie Kirk Translation: You are talking about context, and my argument only works if we stay in this veeerrrry narrow lane.
@@jamesmillar5951 I know you're trying to make a joke, but I cannot let it stand: that's the wrong kind of plot for that data type!!! A line makes no sense. You might as well use a pie chart you... you.... graph-plebian!
I can't believe Charlie Kirk would DARE walk around with his wrists and neck exposed, for all the world to see, like a common strumpet. It's degrading our entire civilization. He's never going to find a life partner this way.
Actually he's found one. What bothers me is that she'd allow him to go out dressed like that. I guess she's more liberal than her husband. She should fix that.
Unfortunately it won't sway most of the ppl like charlie boy and his fans, they think whatever a woman says isn't worth hearing, they just want a slave wife
I really feel like if anyone is degrading towards men, it’s Charlie Kirk. I’ve never felt more uncomfortable as a man than hearing my sexuality be described as degenerative primal instincts
The percentage of adult video workers who are married is just as high, if not higher, than it is for the rest of society. Someone needs to point this out to Charlie Kirk. Sex work does not preclude one from a long-term committed relationship.
Yea what he should be talking about is the high sucide rate in the sexy work industry, high drug abuse/ over dose rate.. any loser can get married even sex workers
I don't mean this in a dickish way, this is a genuine question and not the start of an argument, but can you point me towards a source for the claim that porn actors have higher marriage rates than the general population?
@@kurtukhrates of loneliness and self deletion is higher among men than women. And of the men it’s higher among conservative men. A woman doesn’t fix that kind of despair and loneliness but finding a community does, so why don’t men build communities where they can foster close connections? Why don’t men have strong bonds with their family or friends? Like these are not issues women struggle with on a large scale these are men issues men need to fix amongst yourself.
to be quite honest there are interruptions periodically during the actual video from almost everyone woman Charlie Kirk is talking to. You gotta understand it's just one guy vs I didn't really count how many women so it's bound to happen a few times during this kind of podcast.
I would also like to add that Charlie Kirk consistently demonstrates remarkable intellectual agility, articulating his views with clarity and conviction. His courage and quick thinking have earned plenty of admiration, as he deftly responds to challenging questions.
Not just the need but the authority. He's so stupid. I cannot tell you how many women I've talked to who laugh their buts off at him. Yet he still thinks he can pontificate on his pod.
For me it's a bit weird how he acts like his way above these girls IQ but never let's them finish a sentence, but also doesn't want them to interrupt him.. I don't think a discussion can go on with one party never being allowed to finish their ideas
Yeah, they haven't mentioned the guy who has all the young women on. He sounds right-wing from what little I've heard. It seems to be a similar format to Fresh and Fit.
@@polydex108 I’m convinced that he sets up this podcast to have sex with very young girls, he has no actual vested interest in trying to understand the gap between men & women and it’s so obvious and disgusting
@@polydex108 I am like 90% sure he runs that podcast to hook up with young girls, either barely legal or even possibly under that looking at who he surrounds himself with
@@-aquamarine-324Wow, yeah, someone else said he was a single guy. I've only seen clips of him saying straight redpill stuff. I mention Fresh and Fit because they both seem to always have a circle of young women to "debate".
Isn’t it so funny that Kirk almost always has to claim hypotheticals as arguments because it’s the only way they feel like they don’t look absolutely stupid, but it just makes them look stupid
I was reading the comments on the original YT video. It's disgusting how all the "macho" guys are supporting dum-dum Charlie Kirk over all the women. We live in horrible times.
The prettier and more “of value” (🤮) they think we are the worse we get treated by them. There is not a single thing a woman can do to ensure she is treated with proper respect and care. Ladies, do you and walk away from them!
Telling OF models/sex workers that they do not understand men's sexual nature is next level idiocy.
Lol, you ain't lying.
It's like how Scorsese and Miyazaki have no clue what entertains people.
For real
@@MistyBurrHe’s a corncob. Learn.
@@MistyBurr Ah, a boomer
The fact that Charlie Kirk doesn't know that women can also have a "primal nature" proves he's never turned a woman on.
His poor wife will never have an orgasm
"Women never gets wet!" known women-whisperer Ben Shapinjo.
Maybe Ben Shapiro can help him land a woman even when he keeps her drier than the sahara desert.
Many of the red pill dudes never turned on woman.
So true 😂
Charlie Kirk trying to explain women to women is the best unintentional comedy ever.
He makes me want to vomit
considering women on the left cant even define what a woman is nowadays, a man explaiining isnt far fethced
Charlie trying to explain anything to anyone is the best unintentional comedy ever.
it's like whatever the opposite of ASMR is
😂😂 true
Charlie Kirk’s wife was Miss USA contestant who stood around in bikinis for a living. The hypocrisy is insane
You act as if he can control his wife with a flick of his finger, though I will be honest i'm not sure when this event took place but If past events are being referenced, it's essential to consider the context and timeline, as people can't be held accountable for actions prior to their marriage. Let's not assume he controls her past, just as he shouldn't be blamed for it. Besides even if this is true it's unfair to assume she was objectified or exploited simply because she chose to participate in the pageant. It's important to respect her agency and not make assumptions about her experiences based on limited information, as Kirk's advocacy work suggests he is committed to promoting respect and dignity for all people
@@gabrielfrierson7080 he’s literally telling these women that because they show themselves online in lingerie they will never have a life partner. It’s a direct contradiction.
@@gabrielfrierson7080 your brain worms are all the way out of control
@@gabrielfrierson7080A long, contrived response from you, only to be succinctly proven wrong. Sit this one out.
LOL women in pageants aren't inherently objectified or exploited? Especially when a lot of them are groomed from childhood? The women on OF Are much more likely to have completely consented to their job and not been groomed into it. Women 18+ controlling their objectification and actually being paid directly for it is much more inherently exploitative than starting in pageants with a face full of makeup at 4yrs old /s 😂😂😂
Charlie: Women are treated better when they show less skin.
Women around the world in burkas while being relegated to second-class citizenship: ???
Careful, you might be accused of islamophobia by the woke morons 💀
As a muslim, lived in muslim countries.
I can confidently say that is a terrible analogy. The real problem is that terrible men exist everywhere irregardless of what they where.
@@muhammedaleem882 Also as a muslim, not true at all. lets not forget afghanistan or saudi. Lastly, OP wasnt talking about the culture or men, but the law itself.
@@KoiWrez I know he didn't talk about culture of men. That is what I was talking about. But I should've called them "muslim" countries. As I don't believe there is a single one left anymore.
@@muhammedaleem882 Wdym? Is saudi not muslim?
Why is it a womans job to "lift up a man?" What happened to personal responsibility? Shouldn't conservative men be lifting themselves up? If they believe in personal responsibility, then they should.
Charlie doesn’t subscribe to Jordan Benzo Peterson.
@@tannerpayne4384I mean, he's not remotely the only person to push this idea on the conservative side.
"It's your job to make men better by allowing yourself to be subjected to their every whim and giving up your autonomy to them" it kinda makes me think of right wingers and how they view Ukraine. "Peace will come... if Ukraine just lays down and subjects to Russias dominion"
It's their dogwhistle for their submissive wifey's doing what they're told and not what THEY want "like some kinda lesbo feminist"
@@tannerpayne4384 They are part of the same sphere of influence and thought, any petty disagreements and quibbles they might have don't change that they're essentially preaching the same stuff.
I'm always amazed at how these conservative guys can read off a laundry list of men's problems, and it's always women's job to fix it.
The lack of self awareness and introspection is a staple of the conservative movement.
Self awareness is not a conservative strong suit.
Well said.
ALWAYS! And I'm sick to death of it, isaac!
AND they want them to do the laundry that's on the list, too.
Charlie Kirk just wanted to talk down to women who would never sleep with him.
If there is any inference about the the nature of men (cishet men obviously because Kirk has no interest in acknowledging anyone else) to be drawn from this video it's that maybe our deep inner Freudian id leads us to be resentful of women who don't want to let us use them as our own personal objects. Or at least Charlie seems to be giving us a case study of that right here. While I don't necessarily buy that theory as a general rule, I think there's a lot more to it than his explanation of what motivates us as men.
I think your actually right 😊
Ah. Like it's a kink for him.
As opposed to some speculative other kind?
@@zacg_good point
8:08 “the laws were fine in the 1950’s”…. Women couldn’t have a bank account and no-fault divorce was illegal. This is Kirk showing us his ideal.
Do you actually know why it was the case? why they couldn't have a bank account or vote and if they would have rather been able to or not? I am curious to learn it from an expert like you.
Well given the trajectory of america I'd say we went wrong somewhere and I wouldn't doubt if it didn't have to do with it....
@@maximecaron1969 Are you actually arguing that women don't want autonomy? They don't want to have financial control over their own lives? Don't want to vote and have a say in lawmaking and the future of this country? Are you...dumb? Or just a misogynist?
@@anticommie2132I pulled a rusty nail out of my foot and slipped on a banana peel the following day. It follows that the extra traction provided by the nail would have prevented slipping on the peel and should not have been removed.
@@BartlebyScrivener-oz6mk Is this a sad attempt at trying to be clever? Dunning Kruger is a real thing.... smh.... gulp down a few more psychedelics and pretend you understand the universe just a little more.
I wasn’t born to make men happy and comfortable, it’s not my responsibility to change the way they treat women.
too bad, I'm a man and what you said made me happy and comfortable. Watcha gonna do about it!?!?!?!
@@Seigensi still not my responsibility but you react as you please
No you weren't you were born to be you and not to make a man happy!
good luck with lonely nights of doordash and kitty litter
@@pfezziwigWe are FINE with that! Yall are pissed we would rather a cat than YOU!
kirk thinks women are in charge of training me not to be a rapist? is that why i'm not a rapist, cuz some women forced me to learn not to assault women? i don't remember that happening.
Exactly. It's kind of sinister when you consider the only logical conclusion to having this belief is "rape is the woman's fault".
Which is one of the worst things I have ever typed... thank god I do not believe it.
@@dosuserx give me a timestamp where he says that or something that implies that.
@@Dante3214 if you're referring to when he was asking if you'd be more or less respected depending on how much clothing you wear then you're being disingenuous. He's not saying it's the Woman's fault. He's saying that wearing less makes you more of a target for those types of degenerates. Not implicitly that it's their fault, the one committing the act makes that decision, but that by wearing less they will put themselves at risk. Be it because others think that more promiscuous clothing is a sign that they don't respect themselves and makes them less likely to fight back or for the simple fact that less clothing might turn said wrongdoers on. Either way it's not the woman's fault, but they are setting themselves up for failure. Especially in places with a high crime rate.
@@dr4ke338they're referring to 05:28 on wards - the abundance of skin and women needing to lift up men (by covering themselves up)in order for r@ pe not to happen... 😲😬🤫😱🤷♂️🤦♂️
@@dr4ke338 He said it in this video. The whole "Women need to train men to be civilized" so because men do shity things it's implied that women didn't civilized them enought to not do those things. And if he doesn't blame women that are dating men, he will blame the women that raised those men... I think Kirk needs to learn to use a washing machine and then talk about relationships.
I can sum this up for everyone.
Charlie Fivehead Kirk mansplains to women how everything is their fault.
And how he's not responsible for anything.
This is Timothy Poolson “It’s definitely not me” levels of idiocy and lack of self awareness
When does he do that. Pls explain
@@Creasey_Fall throughout the video…actually watch it! He’s a poor excuse of a man…& human PERIOD!
I think he's doing a good bit of projecting as well. Like how he views things is how everyone views them.
"How do you get treated better by men" like it's her responsibility to make men not be shitty towards her
The funniest thing is he would hate the correct answer.
act like a hoe usually ends in being treated like one
It’s a two way street.
It's not her responsibility but it does effect the outcome. Just as buying flowers for a woman and giving them massages make women treat us better.
That's not inherently misogynistic. Everyone likes acts of kindness
Classic victim shaming
These guys argue that "traditional" women stayed with their husbands because they were more virtuous, and "modern" women are ruined by feminism. They absolutely refuse to acknowledge that their mothers and grandmothers might've been MISERABLE in their marriages, but couldn't leave because of the institutionalized barriers against them. And then, OUT OF THE SAME MOUTH, they'll talk about getting rid of no fault divorce, getting rid of antidiscrimination laws, etc...basically anything to put those institutional barriers back in place. You know, the barriers they say never existed.
Actually part of the research that’s been done , many of these “feminist” that are now getting up there in age , have discovered that they would of much rather be in a relationship and have a family , rather than end up old , sad and alone, don’t take my word for it. Ask around for yourself , many women are wishing they would of ignore the stupid “feminist” movement (meaning the crap it has become) and wish they could of perhaps had been more submissive in a relationship and played the role
@@dannysolano4430 So there's research saying women regret feminism when they're older? I'd love to see that "research."
Here's what you need to understand. Women don't choose to not get married because of feminism. If a woman chooses not to get married, it's because she doesn't want to be married. Women don't choose not to have children because of feminism. If a woman chooses not to have children, it's because she doesn't want children.
The only role feminism plays here is that it gives women the power to CHOOSE. When they have that power, they make the choices that work best for them. Like me -- I'm a feminist. I'm also a married mother of 2 and I've been a full time homemaker for...22 years. That was my CHOICE.
Sometimes people regret the choices they make. But they never regret having the right to make choices. No woman, not ONE, chose to remind childless because feminism told them to. Because feminism doesn't tell them to. If you don't get that, then maybe you need to "ask around" yourself. If you find a single woman who wanted to get married and have kids but didn't because of feminism, I'll eat my hat.
@@dannysolano4430Oh yeah, they’d much rather be stuck in a marriage where they feel sad and alone instead of
Or maybe they stayed because they took a vow and had a will to fight for what's right and fight side by side instead of just give up!
If being married means being with someone like Charlie, I’m making an OF
If being married means being someone like Charlie, I will be voluntarily celibate. Call me Father John cause I'd give myself to the lord before I accept that idiots ideologies
enjoy the lonely nights and anti depressants
Intelligent, respectful, rich and not a sheep...... Yeah, don't matter, you might want to start that OF cause you're not getting married anyway, might as well say it's by YOUR choice! 😂
@@commonsenseisdeadin2024 says the boy
@@TheHugeDwarf sure......
was his argument really "men can't help themselves, therefore it's up to women to be the adults"?
I think Charlie Kirk just likes to hear himself talk, and doesn't understand or care how wrong he is
Basically yes, that was his argument. 😂
The way he spoke, he seemed to make the argument that men can't control their own urges and desires.
This coming from a guy who probably touts "personal responsibility" when talking about poor people, or college graduates with loan debts.
That's way more misandrist than the stuff i hear from even terfs
@@rishabhanand4973It's actually pretty similar to their arguments, just with different conclusions. Both claim that the "male sexual nature" is depraved and predatory, but radfems/terfs conclude that all men/ masculinity/amab ppl are evil, while he/conservatives blame women/afab ppl as a concept. Pretty interesting. It's how radfems end up agreeing with conservatives on being anti-sex work/bdsm/etc.
"In the 1950s, the laws were fine." -Charlie Kirk 2024
Don't get him started on the degeneration of our modern drinking fountain laws.
@@AeronPrince Wow didn't know Kirk supports a 90% tax bracket! Great news!
@@RigelOrionBeta I've been waiting for the 1950s revival traditionalists to mention the 1950s tax brackets.
Yeah Charlie, top rate of tax 90%.
I mean, the top marginal tax rate was that 90-91% Sam wants...
Conservative men: "Life is all about rugged individualism and taking personal responsibility."
Also conservative men: "I need a woman to be a surrogate mother to me and do everything for me because I'm too incompetent to do anything other than my job by myself."
Wait, aren't the liberals ones who are individualistic? From what I understand, conservatives place value in familiar and communal structure above the 'do whatever you want as long as you aren't hurting others' motto of liberalism
@@okramra Conservatism says that it's not the role of government, or society in general, to help you with your problems. All right wing ideology pretty much says this, including right wing libertarians. Liberals are a bit better about it, since they believe in at least some social safety nets generally, but the further left you go, the less individualism tends to become a thing. Because we live in a society and not in a bubble on our own, so that approach makes no sense.
@@Noooiiiissseee I agree with the further left you go notion, but I reject the statement that no right wing ideology is collectivistic. In fact the far right ideologies very much emphasize a strong state, strict societal norms and unity, totalitarianism and collectivism. None of those traits are individualistic.
@okramra But then, why are most Conservatives always speaking out against high tax rates (which were normal in the 1950s) and safety nets?
That's the problem, I don't see any far-right conservatives talking about ensuring medical aid or education for all citizens, yet I simultaneously hear them belly-aching about what kids are taught in school?
coming from the crowd that says everything should be free! pay my student loan! pay my house. also we would like a ubi!!!! but we gonna complain that a guy want a wife to be wife material LOL you cant talk about "surrogate mothers" when you want the gov to be your mother. entitled brats lol
So I just did a 10 second Google search and found out Charlie Kirk married Miss Arizona 2012.
This guy is rambling on about women showing less skin while he’s married to someone that did all that in 2012. The guys are ridiculous.
She probably gets a pass cause she’s the first attractive woman to give him attention.
The audacity of Charlie Kirk claiming authoritative expertise on Any animals sexuality is the absolute definition of the Dunning Krueger effect. I didn't realize he was credentialed in biology, sociology, and anthropology. I'd really like to see those degrees, Charlie.
He thinks college is a scam so good luck getting him to present a degree. His credentials are "trust me bro"
He doesn't have a degree but spends his time on College campuses basucally to outwit students and speak out against liberal indocrination in College. Really I don't recall personally being liberally indocrinated in College. The main issue which is never brought up in right wing circles is the outrageous cost of now going to College. I think its good for kids to go to school as it starts to breed independence from living at home. This is a problem that kids need to grasp to deal with real life that the right states they aren't ready for yet. Kids now get saddled in debt at an early age then we wonder why we have issues of people not able to buy homes or compete in the real world.
I also like how in addition to be being really hateful towards women. Charlie is also very degrading towards men. He thinks that it’s men’s nature to be sexually predatory which is a really disgusting. When the truth is that way of viewing women is taught and isn’t innate.
Good point, King. He has no respect for men, does he? Depraved? What does that tell you about Charlie?
@@kingpinpasta2934 I disagree with Charlie on many things but I don't think he ever said that. He thinks in order to have a committed relationship, men in their prime should go for women in their prime as well.
@raymonddarhk20 This is a man with a receding hairline and is divorced. According to these characteristics, a woman would be out of her prime. Isnt he also out of his prime with this logic and if he is, who is he to talk about what women want?
So true
Do you think Charlie Kirk even realizes how insulting he’s being to men in addition to women? Because I’m pretty sure his intention is to shame & degrade the latter, but he’s also dehumanizing the former.
I doubt it but I really wish someone would challenge him on this point. I noticed it right away!
That’s what is called toxic masculinity.
@@martinpenwald9475 it's like a buzzword nowadays, unless you wanna give us a scale like what amount of Masculinity is good & anything beyond that is Toxic-Masculinity?
@@raymonddarhk20FD Signifier has several great videos on it! You should go give them a watch! 😁
@@raymonddarhk20 you can be masculine and an egalitarian- charlie is not. toxic masculinity is self-serving and harmful to yourself and others. charlie is part of the problem yet refuses to see it, just puts it all on women... that's toxic masculinity.
Kirk showing more skin on his forehead
I laughed at this longer than I probably should have
Well, aamon does a significant job portraying the face shrinker well in his videos.
I read it as “Kirk showing more skin on his foreskin” and I was like wtf 😂 I was thinking that even his penis has a white hood over his little head 😂
"I don't agree with that at all" he says as hundreds of thousands of women who are victims of acid/assault/rape who are dressed modestly. It's literally denying that they exist or at least denying what happened to them, despite the facts
Hey we live in america go to that country and express your complaint... lmk how it goes....
@@anticommie2132 YOU live in America, no one was talking about America but since you want to, my sentence still applies. Facts and statistics don't change because of your feelings dude, get over it
@femalewoman7441 Do you have air where your brains should be?
@@anticommie2132are you saying the apparent 'primal human nature' of men doesnt apply to all men globally?
@seaofenergy2765 you don't know anything about the primal nature of man for one. It's especially apparent if you lack the comprehension skills to grasp what I'm saying, which is evident. Apparently explaining things that are basic common sense to you would be futile due to your indoctrinated minds! Therfore I will kindly excuse myself from being consumed by anymore of your intellectual fallacies! I hope communism works out for you comrades I wish you luck and godspeed!
I’m not really familiar with this little white Urkel guy, but he’s dressed like a low-rent restaurant magician and his thoughts are on the level of a junior high student.
OnlyFans makes misogynists crazy because it gives women a bit of earning potential and control over their lives.
Charlie Kirk just hates capitalism.
and women.
Powerful women make men like this fragile and useless
The primary reason prostitution was outlawed in the US was because precisely that reason. Women were making money and with money came influence and power. The men around them couldn't tolerate that so there was a big push to outlaw prostitution but they masked it in moral arguments of the Christian variety.
@@SalinaBabba8343ty interesting. I'm currently watching Last Madam 2019/foreign film dubbed. Madam explains world as it is "To be born a woman is to be born a slave. To your husband, your mother-in-law, your children & your pimp. At least in here you can have some level of power." 1972/Some where in N.Y. city, John Lennon/Yoko Ono song "Woman is the n___ of the world" both gave me reason to pause...sigh/feel a little Mellon collie ☹️
@@Salina-qd6es did you just spell it _Mellon collie?_
That. is. amazing. I love it
The host of Whatever podcast is 39, he’s never been married, and has no kids. He’s said he wants a “trad wife” who’ll stay at home, cook, clean, raise their kids, and be totally financially dependent on him, yet he says he won’t enter a “legal marriage” because he doesn’t want to risk his wife divorcing him and taking everything. I don’t know his stance on pre-nups, but I’m assuming he wouldn’t want to sign one because he wouldn’t want his partner getting a single penny if she left him, despite insisting that she’s totally financially dependent on him. In other words, he wants someone he can control and who will feel trapped into staying with him. What a catch, huh? I wonder why no woman has snapped him up yet?
Edited to clarify that there’s nothing wrong with being childless and unmarried at his age. I’m close in age to him and I’ve never been married or had kids. I mentioned it to point out the hypocrisy. He judges women for not being married or having kids by the time they’re in their 30s (he also shames younger women if they have kids because he clearly just hates women), yet he’s almost 40 and it’s fine for him because he’s a man.
That dichotomy is so funny to me “I want a traditional woman who will wait on me hand and foot, sleep with me whenever I want, do all of the cooking and cleaning, never work….but I’m afraid she will take all of my money and will try to get half in a divorce!1!1!1!!!!11”
I'm almost 34 and almost as much of a loser. I can see why he might have the impulse to blame someone other than himself, considering how rough a situation he probably has.
Granted, my sexual frustration and loneliness doesn't have to become externalized into some nonsensical self-serving ideology.
So for me it pisses me off a little to see them complaining. I have to deal with reality too, but I don't force others to deal with my reality.
Your dumb Brian rejects the institution of marriage completely he’s cool with a long-term partner and never getting married
He just hates women
The problem with MOST jobs, is that you are doing it because you need the money not because you enjoy it.
I like how Charlie Kirk has not once had a real job and likes to tell people how to live
Let alone any useful degree with field, real-world training for a profession that contributes to society. I don't count talking heads for right-wing, conservatives, spewing false talking points with no data or evidence, and misrepresent statistics on bad faith arguments as a real job.
@@cs-zz7jdthat’s what is called a logical fallacy. Appeal to authority. Just because he doesn’t have a degree doesn’t mean he can’t be educated. Hundreds if not thousands of lesser educated people were right about many aspects of covid without being “experts”
@@joshuaklimkowski9744That's not what appeal to authority means 😂 Would you rather a licensed doctor give you open heart surgery or the hospital janitor? Appeal to authority only applies when they authority is unrelated to the argument. Charlie gives life advice yet he has never had to actually work to build his life. That's a relevant point.
Definitely goes some way to explaining why he thinks women not having careers was totally unrelated to the low divorce rate in the 50s. "Who the hell needs a job anyway, I've never had one and I know pretty much everything!"
@@joshuaklimkowski9744 What are you going on about. He has a degree... it's just worthless. No one is saying that he isn't educated. It's just that his degree is worthless. Don't we love making fun of the blue hair'ed art major?
Charlie Kirk, saving modern men from the absolute living Hell of...
**checks notes**
...dating a lingerie model... wait wut?
Charlie Kirk says “Hold on a second” at least a dozen times. No one is allowed to talk at length except Charlie.
Charlie kirk trying to deny that women in burqas get abused is peak comedy
Is that why we went to Iraq and Afghanistan in the 1st place?
No its actually so sad. People honestly believe that
"Men want what they cannot see"?? Is he kidding? How many times have I heard certain types of men say "Well, she was dressed provocatively, what was she expecting?" in order to justify lack of sympathy for rape victims.
Well, what is the excuse when the victim is dressed non provocatively, fully covered with a heavy winter coat, gloves?
Nevermind. It's always the woman's fault. I don't know what I was thinking. I should know by now it's never the insecure asshat's fault, that won't take "NO" for an answer.
The whole conversation is bullshit. People sexual preferences when it comes to being scandtily clad or in something less revealing is completely irrelevant to r*. R*ist look for thos they consider weak, defenseless or under their control, which is why it mostly happens between authority figures, such as family, and those they are close to. When it happens randomly, it's in a situation when the r*ist can momentarily take control of the victim. What victims are wearing, doing or look like is completely irrelevant to the r*it's motivation.
The irony is that it's the same logic that Islamic extremist's patriarchy uses to force their women to excessively cover themselves up and yet, you'll never catch Charlie Tinyface praise them for taking his argument to its logical conclusion.
There is also a large group of men who talk nonstop about women’s appearance in particular beautiful and/or thin women deserve more than ugly and/or fat women. So these men are very shallow and superficial and 100% care more about what they can see than what they cannot.
They want to borrow what they can see. They want to own what they can't. The key word is "own".
Also it's all B.s
"I'm asking a theoretical question" he says, as she's talking about reality.
Classic goalpost shifting from the tiniest face this side of the Mississippi
She was making valid points and Kirk decided to just ignore her answers or straight up dismiss them.
Sadly, that's the usual m.o. of alt-right pundits.
Not seeing the alleged man willing to take any "personal responsibility" here. They want the perceived respect as men with the unaccountability of children.
I find it funny how these dudes condemn women for doing OnlyFans but never seem to condemn the men for making onlyfans so profitable for women.
If men didn’t spend their money on OF, then women probably wouldn’t do it. It’s almost like they are meeting a demand with a supply.
You ain't lying. I don't understand how bootlickers like Kirk are able to get so popular.
Duh.
It's the woman's fault for making content that guys want to spend money on.
Party of personal responsibility ladies and Gentlemen
This whole "whatever" podcast is one big thirst-trap for incels who will hatejerk themselves raw from the combination of beautiful onlyfans girls and male misogyny
@@AgentAika001it's witchcraft, spells, Satan
not just that. They didnt and dont, have a problem with actual porn sites. Many of which feature and popular vid category, show women being abused or filmed unknowingly. The difference with Onlyfans is women are safer doing their own content. Its something these con male pigs, dont profit from and cant find sick enjoyment in.
Charlie's not in his element - outside college freshmen dormitories.
Oh yeah, women love being loudly talked over at every turn.
Women will love what I tell them to love :)
What I told your mom last night
in my experience it's like their single most favorite thing (besides being told that they should smile more)
@@andyghkfilm2287shee-it. I laughed too hard at that.
Wellllll, women going on podcasts like this one does kind of prove that point. 😂
Strange that Charlie Kirk married his wife when she was 32 after saying women over 30 are "not at their prime"
She is also 5 years older than him
Because that’s the ONLY girl he’s ever had, or only girl that has ever had interest in him. And it’s only because he has money. He wouldn’t have her if he was broke.
@@princequestly2218 dudes tall, good looking and has money. he married an older woman because just look at the state of young women, evidence right there in the video
"Hold on, let me just keep asking you questions and then butt in continuously so you don't get an answer in"
The Cartman method😅
Charlie insisting that only men have primal and carnal inclinations is inadvertently admitting how undesirable he's always been to women.
Well it is scientifically proven on average (there are exceptions to every rule) that men do indeed have a higher sex drive, this is down primarily to testosterone. In fact in women with higher than average (for women) testosterone levels (ie medical condition or taking performance enhancing drugs) it does increase sex drive.
Also there seems to be a neurological difference in that a man’s sexual activity can be turned on or off like a light switch. While a female’s is more like a pathway of stimulation finally arriving at the end (hence the importance of foreplay to women when a dude can just ….head straight in if you know what I mean).
He specifically says "*Men's* primal carnal instincts". You're listening to this channel's F tier commentary instead of what he is saying. Not once does he say Women don't have those same carnal instincts.
@@dr4ke338you should read about othering. It’s a process where a strict binary is created with opposing traits of the two sides. People like Charlie Kirk think in this manner.
Men do not equal women - therefore
If men=strong women can not be strong
If men=calculated women can not be that
If men=one thing women are not that thing
If he talks about a “primal nature” being repressed he implies a male connotation to that primal nature simply by consistently “othering” women.
You can try it out in your own life and some of your own perceptions and you will find that humans, but especially white, cis, straight men, use “Othering” a whole lot.
Charlie Kirk is a pundit and not even a good one, stop dickriding him for free.
@@dr4ke338lol keep coping incel 😂
@@dr4ke338 no but just like all other aspects of gender relations, he believes the man's primal instincts are superior and should be given deference at all times. That women should make those male drives their primary concern.
Women are not free therapists. This is ridiculous, why should she be expected to change herself when nothing is wrong with her AND fix the behavior of men.
Charlie Kirk is allergic to the idea of material conditions affecting peoples politics.
"Women were happier in the 50's, just look at the lower divorce rates"
'women didnt get divorced in the 50's because they had no way of living without their husbands in the economic structure they were oppressed by'
'well thats just so far afield from the point idk where that came from'
Charlie Kirk - representing men who are terrified of women everywhere.
Anyone who constantly debates the youngest ppl they can find shows you everything you need to know about them
“You’re getting too far into the weeds” -> “you’re looking at the nuances that make my point so very obviously unclear”
"You're pointing out specifics and actualities that completely ruin my imaginary argument."
@@Remedy462 “hey! …hey! Don’t-don’t refute me, when I’m Charliesplaining!”
There are not enough people sitting around that table.
Aren't they capitalists? Why are they sitting around being useless like a bunch of filthy commiez???
😂 I was thinking that, wtf
I agree that diverse voices are crucial for marginalized groups, especially women. However, it's notable that Charlie Kirk often presents a lone perspective and yet consistently delivers thoughtful responses. I must admit, I'm impressed by his courage and intellectual acuity, which allows him to successfully articulate his arguments.
@gabrielfrierson7080 good God you're boring
"I don't agree with that at all" that women get assaulted even for covering all their skin. Good one charlie. The smartest the right has to offer.
Women were more modest and more humble, and look where it got us! We're currently AGAIN having to fight for our basic right of bodily autonomy.
Charlie is the definition of bad faith. He filibusters, interrupts, and says “Hold on, hold on, hold on, when anyone attempts to respond.
He asked his current wife out while he was interviewing her for a job. He had to use a power dynamic to get his first date.
Ick ick ick ick
I actually wanna throw up reading this. What is wrong with some people?
That's funny
Of course.
Can't fault him for shooting his shot. However, he must have had to lower his standards for asking out a pageant girl 10 years past her prime in her early 30's.
kirk's brain was cooked in the microwave
Mental gymnastics cooked Charlie Kirk's brain. When you are obviously wrong, and you know it, the internal struggle of trying to support terrible opinions and pass them off as fact cooks your brain. Just look at Tucker Carlson.
That explains his abnormally small face
Microwave ovens work by rapidly shifting the polarity of water molecules. So that tracks.
@misanthropyunhinged Actually, his brain was cooked in an Easy Bake Oven... and the bulb burned out before it was done! 😉
Are you sure that there was a brain to cook to begin with?
Charlie literally doesn't understand sexual nature at all.
Use it or lose it. hahaha!
He’s a virgin 😂
@@beejeeezy7933a virgin with kids lmao
@@beejeeezy7933 Charlie Kirk is a married man who practices his Christian faith, which teaches that premarital sex is not acceptable. According to Christian beliefs, sexual intimacy is meant to be a sacred expression of love and commitment between two people who have publicly vowed to love and cherish each other in marriage, and premarital sex can undermine this commitment and cheapen its value.
how about finding a man who won't speak over you?
I'm sure you'll get one some day geoff... just keep searching and that special man will come your way!!!
@@anticommie2132 you think I'm the incel? dude you're the Matt Walsh fan...
@geoffchurchill5492 I don't even know who that is... I'm American... Sorry gotta go the kids need to wake upbfor school...
The same bros that praise Apartheid Elon for his billions get real triggered when it comes to women making money on their own terms
And it just hit me... PayPal was successful because of porn transactions.
So technically, Elon owes his fortune in large part, to the porn industry.
I love how republicans think people are hooking up constantly, like, where’s the evidence of this?
Schizophrenia
Isn't that also the incel perspective. They feel like they are being left out of the imaginary "hook up culture".
It's every Incel's fantasy, gsn. What a bunch of male maroons!
@@gildardo When they get overwhelmed with sexual frustration, they can just rub one out as a temp solution.
well the stats say humans are having intercourse, if hes having none that means someone has to be!
The tragedy of not being a viable potential life long partner for a catch like Charlie Kirk is heartbreaking.
Soul crushing.
Absolutely soul crushing.
A catch like Charlie! I hadn't thought of it in that way. Of COURSE!
Charlie Kirk’s head looks like a normal-sized head that got reduced in size by a shrink ray and is now riding around in a normal-head-sized prosthetic head.
he's losing his hair. he'll be bald in less than a decade.
@@veilmontTVDoubtful. Lot of guys get transplants at some point if they can afford it.
I mean look at Joe Biden, it def worked for him
Lower case face in an upper case head!
if he had a bobblehead it would have a normal sized plastic head
This is in poor taste! Charlie Kirk has a serious and rare health condition, he was born without an anus, over the years his head has swelled with unexpelled excrement.
7:49 Trump, Trump Jr, Hannity, Watters, MTG all divorced because of affairs
This podcast looks so surreal. There's like a dozen women, each with a mic, but only one of them is talking while the others look stone-faced and bored the entire time.
These young ladies don't get that Charlie is only concerned over their wombs and eggs.
Charlie Kirk is a clown 🤡
Sir, how dare you defame the noble profession of clowning by including Charlie? This cannot stand!
💯
He’s not asking and he’s not even letting her answer, so what’s the point of them having this conversation at all?
To own the women, and get revenge for all the viewer these women personally turned into right wing incels.
It's NO "conversation." It's a Kirk monologue.
"You are getting off track."
Charlie Kirk Translation: You are talking about context, and my argument only works if we stay in this veeerrrry narrow lane.
This dude is beyond toxic
His wife won 2012 Miss Arizona. They aren't getting judged on how much clothes they're wearing BTW, Chuckles.
If anyone in society needs to go to Charlie Kirk for relationship “tips” - RUN from them
Charlie Kirk is the reason why we have the block feature. Because really who wants to engage in that who wants to waste their time in that sand trap?
Want to know WHY she smoked him? Charlie Kirk is a college drop out who deigns to talk down to young women with more formal education than him.
He never went to college and is in videos with millions of views with hundred of employees in his business. That's not successful?
the comment emma makes about rape culture is exactly right
For a guy with auch a giant head, you'd figure it'd be full of brains instead of warm oatmeal.
👏🏻😂😂😂
At least oatmeal has utility
Poor ol' Charlie probably treats headaches with brown sugar.
He doesn't have a thinning hairline that would be a full head of hair on a normal sized head.
His head ain't big. His tiny face just makes it look bigger.
When you see 15 people sitting around a table and everyone has a microphone.....click off
Especially when one is Charlie Kirk
What’s wrong with big panels
@@IncredibleStan no sh*t, sherlock!
@@JohnSmith-bq6nf it ain't the panel, it's the motion!
Which is smaller, Charlie Kirk's face or his brain?
his peen.
It's funny cause if you took a graph of the size of Charlie's brain-head-face small-big-small it's like a belle curve from inside to out
@@jamesmillar5951 I know you're trying to make a joke, but I cannot let it stand: that's the wrong kind of plot for that data type!!! A line makes no sense. You might as well use a pie chart you... you.... graph-plebian!
@@jamesmillar5951you have no right to be that funny lmfao.
You get treated better by men by NOT going on Charlie Kirk's show.
Charlie Jerk: you're bringing up too many facts that support your argument so I need to shut this DOWN by mansplaining and talking over you.
That chick in the middle is bored out of her mind. 😂😂😂
Kirk is BORING! Boring, misinformed, ignorant and DULL!
She looked high af. I would be, too, if I had to be around Charlie Kirk. Lol
Lmao that’s me & I was
I can't believe Charlie Kirk would DARE walk around with his wrists and neck exposed, for all the world to see, like a common strumpet. It's degrading our entire civilization. He's never going to find a life partner this way.
Actually he's found one. What bothers me is that she'd allow him to go out dressed like that. I guess she's more liberal than her husband. She should fix that.
@@MistyBurrwomen sexualize men too, why should men not have the same expectations put on them that women do
These women have, like, a superpower. Every man they do an episode with just walks into the rake like Sideshow Bob.
Unfortunately it won't sway most of the ppl like charlie boy and his fans, they think whatever a woman says isn't worth hearing, they just want a slave wife
Every right-wing cishet man.
They are intelligent and well spoken but I feel like kirk is very capable of walking into rakes all by himself
@@Hitman12.No kidding. Personally, politically... the guy's such a pathetic little shmeckle. Lol
@@Hitman12. probably trows the rake in front of himself too
Guys that’s not fair. He’s using to strawmaning 19 year old first year philosophy students at JuCo.
I really feel like if anyone is degrading towards men, it’s Charlie Kirk. I’ve never felt more uncomfortable as a man than hearing my sexuality be described as degenerative primal instincts
charlie kirk acting like he wasn't gonna go home and goon to each woman with an OF on that podcast
theres no joke here, i'm just stating a fact
Considering many women on OF have stated that roughly 50% of their subscribers are married men, you're probably correct.
Trump is one of Charlie's heroes - how long have his marriages lasted?
The percentage of adult video workers who are married is just as high, if not higher, than it is for the rest of society. Someone needs to point this out to Charlie Kirk. Sex work does not preclude one from a long-term committed relationship.
He would just say they are married to low value men.
Yea what he should be talking about is the high sucide rate in the sexy work industry, high drug abuse/ over dose rate..
any loser can get married even sex workers
I don't mean this in a dickish way, this is a genuine question and not the start of an argument, but can you point me towards a source for the claim that porn actors have higher marriage rates than the general population?
@@kurtukhrates of loneliness and self deletion is higher among men than women. And of the men it’s higher among conservative men. A woman doesn’t fix that kind of despair and loneliness but finding a community does, so why don’t men build communities where they can foster close connections? Why don’t men have strong bonds with their family or friends?
Like these are not issues women struggle with on a large scale these are men issues men need to fix amongst yourself.
Whose marriage has a much higher chance for divorce?
The couple that’s in the sex industry or the couple that’s not in the sex industry?
As a male OF model its about the rent.. lmao
Secure that bag
If you close your eyes, it sounds like Kermit ist talking. I like that!
How are there like a dozen women on this podcast and Kirk still interrupts this much? Dude is massively disrespectful
The ladies wanna hear how much of a prick the face-shrinker truly is.
to be quite honest there are interruptions periodically during the actual video from almost everyone woman Charlie Kirk is talking to. You gotta understand it's just one guy vs I didn't really count how many women so it's bound to happen a few times during this kind of podcast.
I would also like to add that Charlie Kirk consistently demonstrates remarkable intellectual agility, articulating his views with clarity and conviction. His courage and quick thinking have earned plenty of admiration, as he deftly responds to challenging questions.
lmao @@gabrielfrierson7080
@gabrielfrierson7080 I see no intellectual agility in the clip... none...
I don't understand why Charlie Kirk feels the need to tell people what to do
Not just the need but the authority. He's so stupid. I cannot tell you how many women I've talked to who laugh their buts off at him. Yet he still thinks he can pontificate on his pod.
He seems very insecure.
For me it's a bit weird how he acts like his way above these girls IQ but never let's them finish a sentence, but also doesn't want them to interrupt him.. I don't think a discussion can go on with one party never being allowed to finish their ideas
conservatives always make themselves miserable
statistics indicate liberals are disproportionately depressed, woke liberals the most
It's disturbing enough that there are people with his mindset, but it's even worse that they're becoming more outspoken in recent years
They are the majority you just live in a bubble😂
The guy that runs that podcast is one of the worst guys you’ll ever watch like he’s the worst
Yep. Like the son of a weed's miscarriage. The Devil's spawn.
Yeah, they haven't mentioned the guy who has all the young women on. He sounds right-wing from what little I've heard. It seems to be a similar format to Fresh and Fit.
@@polydex108 I’m convinced that he sets up this podcast to have sex with very young girls, he has no actual vested interest in trying to understand the gap between men & women and it’s so obvious and disgusting
@@polydex108 I am like 90% sure he runs that podcast to hook up with young girls, either barely legal or even possibly under that looking at who he surrounds himself with
@@-aquamarine-324Wow, yeah, someone else said he was a single guy. I've only seen clips of him saying straight redpill stuff. I mention Fresh and Fit because they both seem to always have a circle of young women to "debate".
Isn’t it so funny that Kirk almost always has to claim hypotheticals as arguments because it’s the only way they feel like they don’t look absolutely stupid, but it just makes them look stupid
Same with the Shapiros and Rubins of the world. Let's say, hypothetically...
Came to see Charlie get rolled, stayed for Emma's OF elbow content.
I have dated a ton of yt females over the years. A lot of them are fed up with the insecure incel vibes that a lot of yt males give off.
Kirk kept getting owned at every point he made and he couldn’t weasel out of her counters lmao
Charlie Kirk is 30, for some reason I thought he was like 10 years older
Why
@@iii___iiibecause that's a rough fucking 30, man. 😂
His attitude
Wait, 30? Damn so he's only a few years older than me
Charlie Kirk telling a room full of women how to be women..😂🤣🤣
I was reading the comments on the original YT video. It's disgusting how all the "macho" guys are supporting dum-dum Charlie Kirk over all the women. We live in horrible times.
It's a right-wing show hosted by the bearded guy that just has the women on to debate. Kinda like Fresh and Fit from what I've seen.
@@polydex108 Aah, didn't know that...
“Rule of thumb” I learned the meaning of that phrase from Sean Patrick Flanery in Boondocks Saints like what 20 years ago? Lmao
The prettier and more “of value” (🤮) they think we are the worse we get treated by them. There is not a single thing a woman can do to ensure she is treated with proper respect and care. Ladies, do you and walk away from them!