Hydroponic Fodder vs Conventional Fodder: Which is Better for Livestock? | Ashwin Sawant .
Vložit
- čas přidán 20. 02. 2023
- Hydroponic Fodder vs Conventional Fodder: Which is Better for Livestock?
Hydroponic fodder and conventional fodder are two different methods of feeding livestock. Hydroponic fodder is grown using a soil-less system, while conventional fodder is grown in soil.
The main advantage of hydroponic fodder is that it can be grown year-round and in a controlled environment, providing a consistent source of fresh and nutritious feed for livestock. It is also highly efficient in terms of water usage, as it requires up to 90% less water than conventional farming methods.
Conventional fodder, on the other hand, relies on soil fertility and weather conditions, which can lead to inconsistencies in crop yields and quality. It also requires a larger amount of land and water to produce the same amount of feed as hydroponic fodder.
However, some farmers argue that conventional fodder provides a more diverse diet for livestock, as it includes a variety of crops and plants. It also allows for more natural grazing and foraging behavior for animals, which can improve their overall health and well-being.
Ultimately, the choice between hydroponic fodder and conventional fodder depends on the specific needs and goals of each individual farmer. While hydroponic fodder may offer certain advantages in terms of efficiency and consistency, conventional fodder can provide a more natural and varied diet for livestock.
Another advantage of hydroponic fodder is that it can be grown indoors, which can help farmers avoid the effects of extreme weather conditions such as drought, floods, or frost that can negatively impact the growth of conventional crops. This can reduce the risk of crop failure and ensure a consistent supply of feed for livestock year-round.
Hydroponic fodder is also considered to be more nutritious than conventional fodder. The controlled growing environment of hydroponic fodder allows for the optimization of nutrient uptake, resulting in a higher protein content, increased digestibility, and greater bioavailability of essential vitamins and minerals. This can lead to improved health, growth, and productivity of livestock.
However, the initial setup cost of hydroponic fodder systems can be higher than conventional farming methods. The cost of equipment, such as grow trays, irrigation systems, and lighting, may be prohibitive for some farmers. Additionally, hydroponic fodder requires a steady supply of electricity, which can be a significant expense.
Overall, the choice between hydroponic fodder and conventional fodder depends on various factors such as cost, nutritional requirements, and environmental considerations. Farmers should carefully evaluate their options and choose a feeding method that best meets their needs and goals.
Revolutionary idea, great achievement Sawant ji
खूप छान सर 👍
Good job bhai 👍👍👍👍
Protein mainly is in foliar part,stover contains mainly different form of fiber ADF,NDF,
CELLULOSE etc
नमस्कार जी
हाइड्रोपोनिक के लिए क्या आप हमको गाइड कर सकते हैं जैसे ट्रे कहां मिलेगा सिस्टम कैसा लगवाना उचित रहेगा आदि आदि
Bhai sb is ka biz nahi bana sakta
Sir,
Economical compare please
Ashwin ji 1 kg Mai Kitna kg green fodder milta hai?
Cost effective kon sa grass hota hai.
ये चारा महंगा तो नही पड़ेगा?
What about dry matter Contains ??
Cunnigly avoided that topic…
Costing kitna aata hai iska per kg
पण तीन महिन्यांनी जी मका खायला येते तिला खुप कणसे खायला भेटतात ना साहेब
DOSES PER COW MILKIG
Ek bakri ko kitna kg dena hoga sir
Dear Is it possible to to call you on Whats App voice mail?
How much calories, protein, fat and fiber are there in hydroponic fodder (corn , wheat , barli and sorghum) ?
Pls 🙏 give me reply please
Hello! This is Mr Sawant's social media team. To book a consultation session please contact +91 97735 67904/+91 98509 80317
Cost effective kon sa grass hota hai.
ये चारा महंगा तो नही पड़ेगा?
Cost effective kon sa grass hota hai.
ये चारा महंगा तो नही पड़ेगा?