Elite Soldiers End Up as Lab Rats After Being Sent on a Remote Island to be Hunted by AI Robots
Vložit
- čas přidán 28. 09. 2021
- A tight-knit unit of marines is sent to an off-the-grid island for what they believe it's a simple training exercise but turns out to be a battle for their lives.
Other titles:
kill command movie explained,
kill command movie trailer,
kill command movie review,
kill command full movie,
scifi movies
Note: We create videos to encourage people to watch these hidden gems of entertainment. The purpose of this video is to describe the film from our own perspective. For a better explanation, we incorporated a majority of video excerpts from the movie in the explanation. All credit for the video clips used in this explanation goes to the film's copyright owners.
Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.
Tags:
Movie summary, Movie Recap, sci fi movies,sci fi review,sci fi summary, movie review,movie summary,Movies Under 10 minutes,science fiction movie,movie trailer,horror movie review,full movie,Daniel,trailer,daniel CC,Daniel CC movie review,Netflix, Story Recapped, Story, Recapped, Story Recapped Movie review, Story Recapped Explained, Story Recapped Channel, Movie Recapped, Movie recaps, horror movie review, true scary stories, horror stories, mr. nightmare, creepypasta, creepy stories, true horror stories, horror, movie on, pink movies, Mystery recapped - Zábava
i hate the fact that when a character finds out something suspicious, they dont bother telling the others
like bruh it can cost them their lives -_-
Plot armour
Just exactly as it is in real life, people never talk about the secrets they know.
@@lostinspaceandtime9591 mabey for civilians but when your a soldier thats the stupidist decicion you could make you put yourself and your etnire squad at risk.
i hate that sometimes, unless if it's comedy
Tbh they were jerks to her so their fault.
This is why we bigfoots hide deep in the wilderness, we know we'll get experimented on if we're found
Starting to see you more the more I watch these videos
As a praying mantis I’ve came in contact with many bigfoots. They’re a Nice bunch. Hope no one ever finds your hiding spots
Lol
On the rare occassions youve been sighted, have they been clear pictures? Are you just blurry by nature?
Cyborg bigfoots are a thing too. Probably another reason why Bigfoots are more aggressive towards humans.
This was the closest thing to an xcom movie I could find. The squad selection, then plane ride, ai learning the team, team dies off.
Except she actually hit the S.A.R, instead of missing it. (Even though it was a 95% chance of hitting.)
@@AnomalyINC ah yes chryssalid has meandered up to your crack shot sniper whose gun is literally in the buggers head; 50%, take it or leave it
yeah British actors with an American or Canadian accents filmed in England unbelievable
Well, this is like the Suicide Squad but instead with robots in it and minus a giant starfish. 🤷♂️
Its extremely similar to Ghost Recon: Breakpoint, even if breakpoint came afterwards
What kinda gun gets disabled electronically? That seems like a failure or a horrible feature in the weapon’s design.
Your whole military gets shut down by a massive emp, pretty fatal design flaw isn’t it.
@@jackresinelli3994 An emp won't stop a gun from working. Yes the military will be crippled due to electronics failing but not the gun. Do you know what the e in emp stands for? Electronics being disabled electronically isn't a design flaw. A firearm being disabled electronically is. What an idiotic comparison smh
@@FistDaMonkey Something like 90% of americas power is owned by private businesses. Most of these businesses have no back up plan against EMPs. Meaning if war broke out and we were EMP’d, a vast majority of our nation would have to survive without power in any capacity (such as heating, AC, water etc.) This would be pretty devastating after seeing how that went down in Texas alone. I feel that would be a better comparison.
@@ExInfamous No that's still a completely irrelevant comparison. Read the original guy's comment. He's saying a firearm that is operated by a gunpowder and has absolutely nothing to do with electricity shouldn't be disabled through electronic means.
A firearm doesn't need electricity anymore than a computer needs gunpowder.
A good comparison would be if there was a computer with electricity supply that stops working just because it doesn't have gunpowder.
A computer that needs gunpowder would be the only thing equally stupidly flawed as a firearm that needs electricity.
@@FistDaMonkey
it would depend on the gun.
Most likely than not, the sniper is probably the only one who has this disadvantage since he most likely carries a high-tech gun that fires "smart" bullets which needs the input of the shooter which in this case would either be some form of private wifi between the gun and the user which the woman can "hack" into.
It also most likely is somewhat like an interface between the gun and the shooter where shot placement would be quicker and wouldn't need a spotter since the "computer" in either the gun or the shooter or maybe even both would act like calculators to determine where the shots might be.
Bullet: “creates a giant hole in a human torso through both plate armors”
Tree: “not on my watch”
fr
You'd be surprised at how much damage a tree can take.
@@paladinsmith7050 well, not a 50 cal.
Yeah when they started using the tree's for cover knowing all the robots are running 7.62 calibers and up I couldn't help but laugh or when they used smoke grenades knowing those robots would have thermal sensors was a bit silly and if you look closely it doesn't even look like they have plates in their carriers and half the team doesn't even have head gear. Wouldn't someone get suspicious that a ton of military personnel has been MIA or AWOL after going to these "training grounds" and never returning?
@@butterbean7814 A medium sized tree can easily take multiple 50 cal rounds.
Rest In Peace, Drifter. He was a hero,
Broooo chill out with that username
Nice pic
@@therewaswith186 why? You support them?
@@matthewjackson12 he's a commie! Get him off that heli!
@@matthewjackson12 why do you support captialists?
This movie concept is so cool
sus
Predictive programming. Cyborg soldiers, advanced robots and ai.
CZcams for free bro
Yeah that ending is a real waste, would've been way cooler if she succeeded in finding out what happened and shutting it down instead of just a shitty cliffhanger
Could have sworn you were ejected or is my mind playing tricks on me
They literally have electric guns and cyborgs, but they can’t have half-decent body armor.
I mean having electric guns and cyborgs has nothing to do with body armor so I don't see the issue. For example: we have space ships and computers but not a cure for cancer.
@@wilmersandstrom2826 yeah but they have all this future technology, but they still have the same body armor as we do now.
I am more annyoed that those supposedly advanced robots are still missing 99% of their shots. And also somehow get outrun by some humans.
@@trashchief6496 You're missing the point. What I'm saying is that technology doesn't change in unison some things develops fast others slow. One technology my change very rapidly at one point but then stagnant later.
A better example is stethoscope. The stethoscope is over 200 years old it's older than the invention of anesthesia, x-ray, robotic limbs, heart transplants etc. It's only recently that we have begun replacing it for more modern equivalents.
I'm not saying that we will use the same body armor we have today in the future. But what I am saying is that some technologies are harder to improve than others so sometimes you see old technology sticking around even tho tech around it improves.
@@SataniaSquid I'll get back to reading your comment tomorrow. Until then check my new response to @TrashChief
The AI watches them and studies their tactics and later uses it against them.
So they can use it in future wars
Nah... Don't give too much credit to this cheesefest stinker. If this is how AI learning looks like, most modern games have better AI, in fact, Doom back in the 90s had more kick in it. Also, wouldn't be that much harder to play the game using less lethal training... I hate this one with a passion. Waste of time.
@@magnuskallas they could just have them watch and practice non-lethal rounds on training dummies. Instead of live subjects.
@@hansandhispanzerfaust6236 Yup. And them robots were dumb as eff also. So they managed to learn what... Gather in plain sight to get sniped? Use drones to piss everyone off? The writer / product designer had no clue whatsoever about basic AI and military tactics. Also, them fancy LED ricer eyes are nice target practice too. Even in WW1 it was common knowledge to cover the light when lighting a cig.
@@magnuskallas You must be fun at parties Mr. Military man
so, minor thought on this. AI would run a billion cycles a week or more in simulation with innumerable variables running combat algorithms before even being considered for deployment, no one just dumps military robots out in the open to run simulations in hopes it learns. That's way to inefficient and would take way longer and pose greater threats to human life. They already did this with, deep blue and chess, OpenAI 5 and DOTA, this isn't a new idea. If it was a genuine effort on behalf of the military to make efficient war drones then that's the likeliest route taken, but then there would be no movie. If they had run the simulations on the AI the soldiers would never had a chance to get boots on the ground they would have been shot on descent.
Yeah. We are at this weird point in history where science fiction kind of becomes pointless and ridiculous, because pretty much anything that could happen in a SF movie is totally rendered mute and pointless by extrapolating where technology will likely go soon.
Technology seems to quickly outrun the horizon of human imagination. Writers and story tellers have no idea how to portray plausible seeming versions of the future anymore and even if they did, the realistic SF they might produce, would be totally unappealing to the movie going and TV series watching audience.
The "Bobiverse" books by Dennis Taylor are good, realistic SF, but normies wouldn't want to watch a movie about a bunch of Von Neumann probes with A.I. pilots buzzing around the galaxy and building copies of themselves.
What I want to say is that all the usual "human conflict" stuff we apparently want and need in our stories doesn't really have room in realistic science fiction anymore, because it has become very clear by now that however the future will look like, that stuff won't play a big role anymore.
It is a bit like when back in the 90s, in shows like "The X Files" they were constantly writing around cell phones. Everyone in the real world already had a cell phone and was using it constantly, but the characters in movies and TV shows didn't have them, or their phones constantly found reasons to not work, because the script writers couldn't handle the characters always being able to reach each other. The stories relied on people in it not knowing stuff, so cell phones became a problem.
It is the same with robots, automation and A.I. now.
Writers can only use those as threats and then allow the human characters to defeat those threads in unrealistic ways. They can't use them the way they most likely will be used in the future, as problem solving machines, because when machines solve all the problems and humans have nothing to do, that doesn't make good stories and people don't want stories about machines interacting with other machines, with no human characters in it.
Debatable. This is allegedly during a period where there are no wars, and maybe they understand that teaching an AI to learn about combat tactics does not exactly translate into an actual scenario: highly elite team of combat veterans try to 'kill' your base, how do you react? It's easy to say, "I'd blow them up or put a million landmines everywhere." It is difficult to actually practice team-to-team combat tactics.
You also have to consider this is a sci-fi world where AI have to 'learn' things, and our modern AI do not come remotely close to the nigh-sentience of these types of AI. There's no way to gauge, for certain, that giving that AI unlimited access would not immediately backfire, hence why in the movie this AI has a localized network and is denied outside access, specifically for this reason.
If the ai could replicate it likely wouldn’t use robots as those cost a lot in terms of processing power
@@realah3001 Eventually an AI would become "GOD" after constantly "evolving" and would no longer even need any "host bodies" to exist either.
Hold on to your papers!
Mills gets taken over
SAR starts shit in the transport
Transport crashes and blows up
It fails it's mission regardless because her cyborg body isn't as durable as an all machine one.
But once it's off the island it could access global network and copy itself into the whole internet
And boom skynet is born
@@hellzXx and it then tries to "train" all of humanity lmao
@@hellzXx This would've actually been a lot better if actual Terminators were to be in it.
No silly one. She stays undercover and programs skynet. The end.
You never truly realize how much works goes into making movies, until you learn about every little thing they do.
facts! since I started learning CG and 3D stuff my mindset changed whet It comes about movies, makes you appreciate the efford that the people involve puts into their work.
from the foley work, to the cgi, and all the things needed for the actual cinematography and more. its frankly a bit overwhelming to think about at times lol.
‘’I am not trapped on island full of robots, you all are trapped in here with ME!’’
-soldier
Haha! I get the reference👌🏾
Heh
Alternate Title: Squad of Arma 3 players face off against Max Skill and Accuracy AI.
Xcom 2 with robots
Good god i hope they live more then 5 seconds
Mills: “OMG WHY DID YOU KILL DRIFTER!!!”
Bukes: “he was gonna get cut open so shoot.”
this is just Syndrome's plot from The Incredibles
Lol true😂
You ain’t wrong..
Mmmm you like popsicles?
I had suspected as much.
Thats literally what I was thinking watching this.
"The forest"
No brush, straight, branchless pine trees, and these knuckleheads can't see the ground based robots covered in red and blue lights...
"Disarms the weapon just by looking at it"
But can she dodge a fist
Scientist: We didn't think that far ahead lmao
She was able to read every expression, muscle, and other scans in optics she cannot turn off... so, she will see the fist before the guy uses it. I'm now a dull-sensed fragile old man with mere memories of martial arts training... I'm an over-ripe tomato ready to splat if exposed to a good wind. I've still gotten out of violent situations without being beaten into hamburger by far younger people that had blatantly obvious advantages... using nothing more than what's in my memories of who I was when I had a usable body. So, that cyborg lady in a young and fit body with her scanners... I can see her making quick work of those larger and better trained than her. Oh, and I'm not pretending to be some bad^ss. I've been a proud pacifist for over 2 decades now. I'm proud of *that.*
XD
I'm a little confused about the plot. So if I have this right they are requested to join a training exercise by a commanding officer, during the exercise they get hunted down & killed, only to find out that numerous small units like them have been requested there & then killed, and that the request came from the robots themselves. And they're being killed so that the AI can complete a training module for itself.
Yes
yeah thats it exactly. the robot started to "learn" from the soldiers, and because it continues to improve upon its own tactics and training, the robot feels that the only way it can accomplish its directive of adapting and learning how to be more effective, was to call in actual military units to "practice" on under the guise of a training course. its implied the robots started with the deer and forest animals before realizing humans, and more accurately, human soldiers, would be a significant improvement on woodland creatures lmao. so yes, you are actually totally right
@@jacksoncordray1593 Theres also abit more. The SAR robots were able to reprogram themselves by exploiting a contradiction in their programming, They can learn combat strategies but whenever they were around the researchers. They had safety protocols which hindered there learning efficency. They couldn't learn to be better killers if their own programming prevented them from being able to kill. So they used thier directive to improve themselves to override their own safety protocols. This is why Mills can't access them to turn their safety protocols back on. It would hinder their misson.
@@Makorze "This is why Mills can't access them to turn their safety protocols back on. It would hinder their misson." Never realised that until i read your comment from 5 hours ago. Damn you got me there.
@Sweet Trap Magi Since the whole Facilityis built to test the SAR machines, there is probably ammo and spare parts for days for them.
If she is a cyborg then she is human, thats the point.
sub human*
@JL-XrtaMayoNoCheese sub-human*
@@anarchyorslavery1616 why is she sub-human???
she's born a human you can't really change that with cybernetics
@@chad899 because she's a actual cyborg and therefore not human?
@@anarchyorslavery1616 cyborgs MOSTLY consist of cybernetics but they're human, they're not robots.
I remember watching this, I had a vague memory of a movie with soldiers, woods, a bunker looking place. Damn, I've gotta rewatch it
Dog Soldiers?
(A movie where a team of soldiers is dumped into a forest with werewolves)
@@thesenate5291 h-how do they die from wolves
does it have ghosts
@@tophatstudios8183 They have "Stupid Movie Character" Syndrome
@@thesenate5291 damn it
I didn't know Skynet had an origin story.
"disarms the weapon by just looking at it" uh-huh... as weapons are known to have so many electrical components with wireless technology in them
Could be some sort of biometric lock.
If im correct, the weapons they are using are issued from the company in which the cyborg girl operates in.
Smart guns with fingerprint locks and optics with AI aim assist could theoretically jam a gun if it was designed to utilize them to operate.
@@geonet3965 Which is why said guns are retarded and would never catch on.
@@cousinzeke4888 well to be honest, there are plenty of benefits with high tech "smart" weaponry, such as security against unauthorized use, target identification, target tracking as well as smart targeting through automated calculations of variables that could affect a shot ( kinda like aimbot in games) ... But yeah until they can be considered reliable, nothing beats the old fashioned ones. After all the more complex a device or tool, the more points of potential failure exist in it.
*Edit: excuse my English, I'm not a native speaker
This is what they mean when they say if AI is given a task without any sort of limit or regulation it will complete that task to the best of its ability. It's not that the AI is purposely being evil, they have been programmed to become stronger and more efficient by any means necessary and that is what they are doing; completing their task to the best of their ability. I'm assuming that also includes not being able to be shut off because they would consider that a vulnerability in their system.
This is a realistic take on a real AI problem. I appreciated 2001 A space odyssey for the same reason. HAL wasn't malicious, it was given the ability to interpret its orders in unexpected ways.
Yeah it's cool to see they used the conventional setting of robots take over a la Skynet, but put it on it's head by not making the robots have any intent beyond their initial programming.
Cyborg and android is two different thing, yet in this film she is describe as robot/android which is quite confusing because she explain that she was human before. The ending is cliche but the action and plot is almost perfect. 7/10.
Indie film studios are still making original films instead of sequels, reboots, and "shared universe" franchizes and I appreciate that. Slick special effects are becoming more accessible to the little guys, too.
This is so incredibly reminiscent of Ghost in the shell and the technologies it showcased. Mills in particular is a weaker stand in for Major Motoko Kusanagi of section 9 with her her ability of hacking , controlling and utilising as well as manipulating the technology around her. The Major (Motoko Kusanagi) as she is fondly called seems much stronger maybe because she is fully cyberized ( and so can dish out as much damage as well as able to withstand more punishment due to her hardened cyborg frame as well as years of familiarization of her cyborg body functions over many years through combat and otherwise )and similar with Mills received her conversion at a young age because of paralysis due to a plane crash and was sponsored instead of a corporation (harbinger)but by a secretive army unit, the 501st . The end scene also borrows elements from the end of the 1995 anime film adaptation where she merged with project 2501 the puppetmaster to become a new entity as compared to Mills being taken over by the SAR robot protocol. However unlike the incredible let down from the onscreen Ghost in the shell movie that starred Scarlett Johansen , this seemed more impactful and superior in its execution.
She's stronger because it's a cartoon, at one point a fully synthetic body is described as being built from aluminum. Even assuming the majors body is all high end alloys and composites the film and shows take a lot of liberty with what exactly such tech could plausibly do.
I do like the parts where they show that a human like body is still weak compared to tue larger machines they can build, when she wrecks her body and rips her arms off trying to pull a hatch open that was pretty cool to watch.
That cool, calm robotic voice, ahhhh. Also, a lot of this movie feels like Doom 3 but without a superhero.
@Aghilas Amoura I think he means without a protagonist
@Aghilas Amoura 2016 and Eternal
For a low budget indie film ($1M budget?) Kill Command was surprisingly enjoyable.
The suspense in this film was great. It's a scary film drawing it terror from real questions about our future. The CGI worked well with robotic creatures, the design was superb throughout, the central soldier was totally believable and well-cast. The implications that the exposition invites are then explicitly dramatised in the final act with the dramatic use of the dummies next to the dead soldiers. A great sci Fi B movie that illustrates horribly a potential future. 9/10
Dude i cant get enough. i love these videos. ive watch so many movies and it saves so much time. Thank you from the bottom of my heart
I glad i see short version. Thx man.
Lmaoo the robot literally said "level 2..START!"
Wonderful fiction, but the experience of actually being in the military kind of set it off for me. Like I said - great fiction... but military protocol was so incredibly off-center, it interrupted my suspension of disbelief.
I think that over-mechanizing war takes away the downfalls/tragedy of war. Loss of human life on both sides let's people know what war really means.
Might as well just fight computer games with each other and stop wars altogether.
Or fight on Mars lol... Fucking expensive ass war but humans won't die at least. Only robots on mars will XD
Seems like you enjoy war situations
Well, modern war will be "modern" for the first week. After that initial week it is either a total war or a peace conference.
After the initial strike and the first big push from any major power GPS, Internet, Satilite comms, Major factories, Supercomputers, Communication hubs ... anything "modern" will be wiped out. And then we are back to radio operators giving orders to increasingly large number of units. It will be everyone for themselves and the guy that sits above them. This is why I am not a fan of drones - they are great if you attack a village buried in sand and blood, it is something else entirely when there is someone capable of basically pushing a button that starts a signal jammer that just makes your controller useless. Anything that is remotely controlled will crash and burn or it will be very hard to operate. Anything that has a computer will be generally unreliable. It is back to whoever acts faster wins. Blitzkrieg of the 21 century - destroy the enemy before the enemy destroys you.
This is basically my oppinion on the global military mindset :
USA - Have an overwhelming power anywhere on the globe so we can destroy any enemy with the initial push. /OR/ Have strike capability strong enough to disable the opponent for long enough to have reinforcements arrive and with their help do an overwhelming push and destroy the enemy.
It is evident where this Overwhelming Power Push tactics lack - when the enemy is not really fighting 1 on 1 (you are not fighting with regular army) you basically lose your edge. Afganistan, Vietnam, Korea are some examples. It does not matter how strong your army is when you neither know where nor who is your opponent.
(Superiority) Very well trained veteran army with the best equipment in the world. It can easily hold its own, but in its tactics there is no place for defence. It has one purpose - to destroy the enemy. This is why this army either wins in the first week or loses on the first hour.
China - Have a vast army that cannot be destroyed in a single sweep. The objective of the PLA is to survive the initial push and counterattack and prolong the war long enough for the population difference to take its effect.
The PLA army is a prime example of an army that cannot die, but can become brain-dead. It is like an immortal human body with a regular human brain. Blow off the brains and the Giant is as good as an Ant. But if it can win the initial push and survive the first toe-to-toe exchange its a certain victory for it in a total war.
(Multitask-Defensive) Large and capable army - both in defence and offence, but it is very hard to have the edge with such a multi-leveled training and equipment gaps.
Russia - Have an army with a state. No matter what, no matter where, no matter the cost - save the Motherland - it does not matter if it is in attack or defence. No matter what - the army shall fight. You have a stick - sharpen it with your teeth and go poke the enemy in the eye with it.
You either beat the Russian army so bad in the initial push that you force them to the table or be prepared to make it lose enough land for it to starve to death. You know only one thing - you cannot win a total war with that army even if you defeat them.
(Defensive) This army has a great defence ability, but power projection is not an easy task with it. It underperforms significantly in low intensity conflict zones.
EU - Have an army ... period. Make sure it is adequate.
It might not be a superpower and continent conquerer, but it is strong and sophisticated enough that you wouldn't want to start a war with them. The cost outweighs the benefit. You should either be an ally to that army or just be neutral - they seek no further than their interests. It is not unified, but is sophisticated and large enough that you wouldn't want to mess with it.
(Defensive-Multitask) Defends its lands and makes sure to have some highly trained units for limited interests based power projection.
India - Have a large army to protect our interests.
Not advanced, yet not primitive. Its army is important for its economy. You cannot build an economy without the means to guard that economy. Formidable enemy that you wouldn't want to mess with without a good plan and an even better reason. It is not an army with a sole purpose of existing as an army. It is more like an apparatus that exist not because it should, but because it needs to. Maybe the only major power player that I can see without an army, period. All the other power players, even if they were alone in the world, still would have had Armed Forces.
(Defensive-Superiority) This army won't go down without a fierce fight, but once its main forces are defeated it is a parade walk. Not that you will be left anything to parade for.
Honorable mention :
Brazil - We are here, you are there. Leave us be. We are not looking for a fight, we are good as we are.
Not so advanced, but enough to knock the wind out of any opponent. The moment you manage to touch the soil both sides will be on the table. You cannot win a land battle with such a terrain. A military synonym for a Jungle is a Meat Grinder.
(Defensive-Miltitask) Have some units capable of showing strenght incase anyone acts aggressive towards it. Capable navy for interest detterence.
One of the coolest sci-fi movies I ever watched. I'm glad you reviewed it to shed some light onto it.
What is the name of the movie?
@@borivojetravica569 kill command
@@tjb6657 tnx
Oh. I didn’t know that was the bad ending when i watched it. I thought yay, she’s alive and revenge on her team.
Thanks, recap 😅
This could work as a skynet origin story.
This was somehow better than that Terminator Dark Fate crap.
@@lostinspaceandtime9591 ooof no kidding
The background track on these movie recaps soothes me so much! I love it!!
I just got to say I love this channel if I never found this video I never would have watched this movie which I just finished now it was amazing glad I didn't watch the whole movie talk but thanks for put it up
High movie recap I love your videos so much
That is the most expensive training where they use robots as target practice and destroys it.
I've been badly waiting for you to explain this movie. 🤗🤗🤗
This is exactly what I was looking for ♥️♥️♥️♥️🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
"She can fire it from afar while he is checking the chamber"
If you are checking the chamber by looking down the barrel, I think you'd probably be dead before making it to year 2 of service.
slamfire i'll bet
I watched Kill Command and it was honestly a pretty sick fuckin movie. Love it.
@Aaron Meza Rodriguez in living rooms, bathroom etc
@@borivojetravica569 Good one :=)
Movie Recapped! You're an inspiration my friend!
I love this!!!
Totally love the storyline and the concept.
These marines are trained to work and fight as a unit. They are brothers in arms and their bond is unbreakable. This human's element is hard to imitate, let alone to understand. That's why they are used as a guinea pig here. AI can be programed to fight but not self-sacrifice. Such an interesting and cool concept.
Dude, the Terminator is basically the symbol of AI sacrificing itself for the mission. That is probably the most common thing AI soldiers are known for.
Brah, block an electric motor from spinning, turn the power on, and watch it self sacrifice itself
This movie deserves a sequel
I love these kinds of movies!! Watching this channel I learned that I love sci-fi, fantasy, AI movies although horror is my #1
all the move that movie recapped are always good
I remember this movie. Cool film.
This was a fantastic movie and I just loved it. Really hope there'll be a part 2
Didin't make sense to put high value assets as lab rats tbh. Its like sending troops against a tank, utterly stupid.
@@mohammedattal8887 the killer robot was the one who requested the troops. That's how he got them there
These robot designs give me an inspiration
I actually saw this movie ages ago, it's pretty cool
This was a good movie, I watched it. I wish there was a part 2
9:49 is that supposed to be a semi automatic bolt action sniper rifle
Its a semi automatic rifle. Where did u get the bolt action part from? Is it due to the grenade launcher attached underneath? And just because it has a scope doesn't mean its a sniper, if you believed that was the reason as to why.
@@nomad4465 maybe it was supposed to be a joke?
@@hansandhispanzerfaust6236 It's some Fortnite gun I think.
@@nomad4465 = Unless I'm mistaken, the rifle he is referring to is the rifle used by Drifter and Robinson. That rifle, unless I'm mistaken is part of the Arctic Warfare line of rifles, which are indeed bolt action. So yes, it is a bit strange to see one fire semi auto.
@@nomad4465 it just looks like they took an L96 and put stuff on it to make it look futuristic they also removed the bolt handle and somehow made it fire semiautomatic.
I did really enjoy that movie - a great watch
Very good movie, I stumbled on this a few years back!
Making a self learning robot programmed to kill seems like an amazing idea
Emps exist
Lol
@@alexjoneschannel so if we can kill something theres no way it could kill us... is that the reasoning?
So the S.A.R robot is now controlling Mill
Yo Ur music by movies make me crazy ......goood peace
This movie was terrifying watching the first time.
You don't need robots to have self improving AI to be more effective than human soldiers, why does every sci-fi movie give robots that ability?
The actual fact is that hard coded robots would have weapons accuracy many times more effective than the best human sniper. A real sci-fi robot death machine could be the size of a drone and use 1 bullet for each target straight to the head. It could do it so fast that it could take out the whole squad before the electrical signals in the human brain have time to process what is happening.
It would still have a human operator though, that's the point. Aim assist or not, you still have to get to the mission location. You have to be able to operate around changing parameters. Robots, and by extension, modern AI actually suck at this. Like AI isn't even in the realm of human perception. Sure, it can pick out points on a display instantly, but what if that point is slightly ambiguous? Then you add in that your opponent is tactical too. We already have drones that can take someone out without notice. And they are terrifyingly effective at it. But you couldn't win a war with just drones.
Movie story : Human vs robot
Background music : Relaxing sleepy music
What is relaxing sleepy music name please please
I like your background sound.
Good job.
Why would you ever have weapons that can be remotely armed/disarmed by anyone that isn’t the user? On top of that why would you give that control to a cyborg? What if the borg goes rogue, how do you plan to kill it if it can turn off your weapon, and because it’s a borg it’s naturally stronger then a human so getting close isn’t an option. These guys were fucked before they even started.
Mhm, and the fucked up concept and idea of that Miles had: "combat AI designed so no human soldier lives are lost." And here I'm sitting like thinking "why are you making tools for WAR in the 1st place? Shouldn't the goal be to NOT have wars?" like, lmao, did anyone ever tell this woman that I wonder.
@@MgMast3r Something to not from human history, most weapons ever made never started out as weapons...gun powder was made for pretty lights. Bear that in mind when you ask 'why?'
@@MgMast3r What if I told you that having a strong military helps to prevent wars from happening?
@@rusher2937 You don't have to, some of our politicians keep trying to sell us that idea too :) Obviously, imma keep rolling my eyes at it. Japan's doing pretty fine with a small military, as well as police force. And well, if ppl are still so stupid to wanna cause wars, then maybe we don't deserve peace after all. Excuses to dump tons of resources into military in times of peace will always remain an idiotic idea (or well, not for those profiting off it at least).. There could be so much better uses of progressing technology, related to bettering health for starters, and regarding making better use of natural resources, than y'know, weapons.
@@MgMast3r Lmao, do you actually believe that Japan would not have been conquered by China already if the US weren't ready to retaliate for them, or by Russia in WW2 if the US hadn't been there?
How has being weaker and not having proper allies worked worked out for Ukraine? Russia just annexed Crimea in 2014 and hasn't given it back yet...
Sure, dumping resources into healthcare/tech instead of the military is great ... until someone with a stronger military takes all of it from you.
It's pretty funny how the highest rating review when the movie came out only had 4k views and this has 2M+. Everyone loves a recap.
Seriously though, decent film in every aspect except for the terrible dialogue.
I hate when they make invincible robots in movies. Even military drones are very delicate, it can't just tank 5.56 rounds continuously. That's not how physics work.
i think is a bad habit on movies, and should change.
people learn from movies and they think a rifle bullet is nothing, while in reality it can blow your head, chop your legs and make terrible wounds, the high velocity of the proyectile make it deadlier than a normal pistol, there's a documentary about war wounds and it's eye oppening, a 7,62 bullet can cut your leg in half
Yes, unreal physics in movies has also become very boring as entertainment.
broo it so much helps students to learn new things
Dude this was a freaky/awesome movie. I’ve only seen it once but it was a fairly good movie.
This is why i need a weapon
This was better than the movie, I seen it back when it came out.
Good "Popcorn" movie when you are watching cheese on down time.
Decent stunts and CGI. New sub. /cheers ScrapBongo Liked
This was so damn good.
Oh, this movie. I remember watching it with my friends. It's practically my first thriller-action with robots looming around the group trying to kill them. It's a really cool concept
What movie is this?
We need a Contra movie!
OHHHHH I REMEMBER THIS ONE THIS WAS SOOO COOL BACK THEN ;-;
Concept is OP
-So what we should make a movie about?
-Have you seen the robot from the Incredibles?
-Yes.
-That! I want a movie about that.
So it’s basically Terminator meets Horizon: Zero Dawn meets Saving Private Ryan.
Not in the best way possible, too.
I watched this films some years ago, its a good film to watch.
Nice Recap ♥️
Already sus when your company is called harbinger
Holy shit I remember watching this years ago and have been wanting to rewatch it but literally forgot the name lmao. Excellent timing
Definitely worth watching the full movie.
cool video!
If a fire arm can be disabled by a look ...its not my firearm anymore i keep old shit 😂
7:30 How far did they tumble down the hill??!
A mile, or more.??
Make a pt.2 and have drifter come back 2 life with a chip. He was my favorite
Hey i remember this movie from years ago. Loved it when i first saw it. Underrated movie right here.
whats the movie called ?
@@boganpride121 "kill command".....it used to be on roku and netflix not sure anymore
Interesting
I hope "minute movies" can make a movie review about this soon. He has such a good sense of humour when telling a story😁
I stumbled into this film and gave it a shot, turned out to be great.
Name of the movie
@@andrewbiggsfs Kill Command (2016)
I've been scrolling by this movie. I kind of want to watch it now.
I have seen this movie before. It had a few issues but overall wasn't bad
Issues? Could it have been that all the black men got killed? That was a glaring one.
@@stevea9963 This feels like bait lmfao, literally EVERYONE was killed except for the main character, who also most likely dies from the cliffhanger lol.
@@stevea9963 Trash bait noob get gud.
Terminator sequel : The birth of Skynet
U mean prequel
Opss
Loved Kill Command.
Love this film