So a cop in a murder investigation is prevented from questioning the most probable suspect because an attorney said no....? .............? And the police wouldn't even name him as a suspect?......
Lazy, he has every right to talk through a lawyer. Prosecutor and detectives just wanted an easy conviction and didn’t want to do the heavy lifting. Sad, when the prosecutor doesn’t care.
@@hadguy1 Yes but if they had named him as a suspect in the case they could have brought him in, lawyer or not. laziness maybe but something else was happening here.
People have the right to remain silent. It’s the first line in the Miranda warning. And for good reason. Unless they have solid evidence against they can’t force him to do anything. Even with evidence he still has the right to remain silent. You say he’s the “most probable suspect” which may be true but where is evidence that proves that?
@@sanesociety-oo2ym I hear you, but (and I'm NO lawyer) I don't think they can just "name him" as a suspect without some type of evidence - and obviously YES, he'd be the most suspicious person in the world concerning this murder - but he had the right to remain silent so he didn't have to talk to them, and the lawyer knew this, so unless they could show something, they couldn't just bring him in without counsel. It is a joke though, and frustrating.
He took the truth to his grave
So a cop in a murder investigation is prevented from questioning the most probable suspect because an attorney said no....? .............? And the police wouldn't even name him as a suspect?......
Lazy, he has every right to talk through a lawyer. Prosecutor and detectives just wanted an easy conviction and didn’t want to do the heavy lifting. Sad, when the prosecutor doesn’t care.
@@hadguy1 Yes but if they had named him as a suspect in the case they could have brought him in, lawyer or not. laziness maybe but something else was happening here.
People have the right to remain silent. It’s the first line in the Miranda warning. And for good reason. Unless they have solid evidence against they can’t force him to do anything. Even with evidence he still has the right to remain silent. You say he’s the “most probable suspect” which may be true but where is evidence that proves that?
@@sanesociety-oo2ym I hear you, but (and I'm NO lawyer) I don't think they can just "name him" as a suspect without some type of evidence - and obviously YES, he'd be the most suspicious person in the world concerning this murder - but he had the right to remain silent so he didn't have to talk to them, and the lawyer knew this, so unless they could show something, they couldn't just bring him in without counsel. It is a joke though, and frustrating.
Was thinking about this case the other day. How strange this was.
Even though Mr Sherman died, the family still needs closure on who killed Mrs Sherman.
He probably had it done.
@@nuttybar9 Blame it on Nixon.
He hired someone.
The killer is still out there. This was a hit.
Sounds like bs. They didnt have any camera footage and they couldn’t make him say where he was at the time???
Bad police work .
He didn't try hard enough to talk to him!
So, what's Greg Moore up to these days? For the record, Sundays were not regular work days at Stafford & Stafford. This was a "special" appointment...
little bit of stuttering there, tell tale sign of lier
Oh well. 😏
Must of been Russia
wtf