Lawyers never found their argument using A39A Or Article 23.Nirbhaya was a device to launch a draconian law. In Kerala a young lady house surgeon was identified and killed ro unleash a draconian law to protect hospital exploitation in Kerala. The girls father fortunately perceived the fraud easily as liquor contractor.
The judge was already predetermined that Talwars had killed their daughter. The trial was going with this preconceived notion and hence the inherent bias.
Your question may be genuine. We can not say with a fix exactitude that the statement carries prejudice as that could be a presumption too, based on the conviction for the offence of filicide by convict/ appellant . Further, in Jaylalitha' case the apex court has held that once an accused is convicted, the principle of presumption of innocence in his favour comes to an end (Though not a good law, yet prevailing till date). Therefore, if the presumption of innocence is lost, and there is also 'reasonable ground for thinking' in a particular way ( in present case in the backdrop of filicide by the guilty), than putting such question - you don't have another daughter to kill ? - , or raising such concern by expressing that sentence during the hearing of suspension of sentence in appeal is perfectly legitimate .
Madam does not believe in strict liability of criminal act, since carrying a reformative mind set as defence counsel to take out criminal out of axe and that is why she got a convincing reply from judge that Talwar should definitely be spared as they do not have other daughter to kill....
Madam I salute to your knowledge and aptitude but do not agree with what you said everytime i.e "this only happens in India", or use "the country such as India" in such a negative sense. This probably shows that you're not aware of the conditions of many of other countries.
what is she saying?”you don’t have another daughter to kill”what is prejudice.You can have any damn thought that’s what mind is all about it’s about how much garbage it can hold.What is oath?bull shit what is law obviously what the Judge says not what’s in book.She is just amateur lawyer.
You just accused the supreme judge as prejudiced!! You must be blind to think talwars as innocents or maybe that's what lawyers do.. fight for the rich. Sorry about your mother, RIP. Hold on justice is doubtful tho.
Such a strong woman she is. Her lecture on CrPC actually inspired me to start studying for sem 5 😞
Did sem 5 even take place? Which institute are you in?
@@rishavsharma8330 Amity University Kolkata
Our sem's gonna start this month
Same here bhai
Awesome guts and convition on/in your words Madam, you really deserve to be a Snr. Advocate. This country needs people like you.
15:35 onwards 💪🔥🔥. True FEMINIST.
Amazing lecture. Her English, pronounciation and the way of talking with knowledge is so polished 👌👌👌
Love you
*pronunciation
Awesome speech, well grounded and truth as it exists that we confront each day particularly in the trial courts.
Loved the lecture. Provided a lot of insight into the world of litigation.
You are very veteran and versatile advocate mam whatever u addressed inspire me in litigation
I was in deep stress today, but today after watching her lecture, I am clam,
I will break the chain of legal stereotypes. 🔥
Uff her words ....I am a Criminal Lawyer and cyber crime Lawyer....she is my inspiration ♥️♥️♥️♥️
Nice illustration of CrPC I would like to hear more videos
Thanks
Every Nice Mam. Awesome lecture..
System has to change.
Whatever case I'm going try wonderfully.
Thankyou ma'am
very much helpful to juniors
You are just wonderful.
Mam U r a great mentor n guide for young lawyers...Thanks so much for sharing highly knowledge giving experiences of urs...
Hello .. Did u study at nlu blore?
very nice lecture
Good analysis madam
Awesome lecture ✨
Lawyers never found their argument using A39A Or Article 23.Nirbhaya was a device to launch a draconian law. In Kerala a young lady house surgeon was identified and killed ro unleash a draconian law to protect hospital exploitation in Kerala. The girls father fortunately perceived the fraud easily as liquor contractor.
Informative session
Really proud of you ma'am
yes u r correct mam
Madam Is SC & ICC not interfere in Army court trail ?
Great ma'am ...
Does anyone know which CrPC book is Ma'am Rebecca or the other students are using?
The Criminal manual. It has IPC, Evidence Act, and CrPC
really good
👌🏻👌🏻
Just one correction - The post of RBI Governor is not a constitutional body. I think that was just a slip of tongue.
🙏👏👏
21:20 Could anyone please explain me how is there is bias in 'you don't have another daughter to kill'?
By saying "another" he's already admitting that he believes the Talwars murdered their child
The judge was already predetermined that Talwars had killed their daughter. The trial was going with this preconceived notion and hence the inherent bias.
Thanks
Your question may be genuine.
We can not say with a fix exactitude that the statement carries prejudice as that could be a presumption too, based on the conviction for the offence of filicide by convict/ appellant . Further, in Jaylalitha' case the apex court has held that once an accused is convicted, the principle of presumption of innocence in his favour comes to an end (Though not a good law, yet prevailing till date). Therefore, if the presumption of innocence is lost, and there is also 'reasonable ground for thinking' in a particular way ( in present case in the backdrop of filicide by the guilty), than putting such question - you don't have another daughter to kill ? - , or raising such concern by expressing that sentence during the hearing of suspension of sentence in appeal is perfectly legitimate .
EVER GREEN 👍👍👍.BY. SAYYID DERVESHKHAN JIFREETHANGAL. MV. ("RIFAYIMOULANA.) BA. LLB. (LAW STUDENT")
Civil services Question.the moot court trail & Practice. Topic view. Vishal adhyatmik
great
Ma’am please share more vedios crpc and IPC also.ur lecturers effectively attack on brain.I totally impressed on u
Listen from 22:00
What a lecture 🔥
Does anyone have her mail id?
rebeccajohn2123@gmial.com
Madam does not believe in strict liability of criminal act, since carrying a reformative mind set as defence counsel to take out criminal out of axe and that is why she got a convincing reply from judge that Talwar should definitely be spared as they do not have other daughter to kill....
The thermal weapon uses very very dangerous by Russia on Ukrain people.
Madam I salute to your knowledge and aptitude but do not agree with what you said everytime i.e "this only happens in India", or use "the country such as India" in such a negative sense. This probably shows that you're not aware of the conditions of many of other countries.
"Criminal lawyer"‼️❓🤣
We are a country... That .... Etc etc... If you dont believe in our country why are you standing on the land of Bharat Mata
pure frod
what is she saying?”you don’t have another daughter to kill”what is prejudice.You can have any damn thought that’s what mind is all about it’s about how much garbage it can hold.What is oath?bull shit what is law obviously what the Judge says not what’s in book.She is just amateur lawyer.
You just accused the supreme judge as prejudiced!! You must be blind to think talwars as innocents or maybe that's what lawyers do.. fight for the rich. Sorry about your mother, RIP. Hold on justice is doubtful tho.
I strongly disagree with this statement
i really inspire Adv Rebecca john mam ,ayone from india can provide her gmail account ?