Writing Morally Ambiguous Characters | Writing Tips
Vložit
- čas přidán 28. 05. 2024
- Let's chat about writing moral ambiguity! Anti-heroes, morally grey characters, problematic favs, and all that messy wonderful stuff.
BLM petitions, donations, and resources (updating list): blacklivesmatters.carrd.co
Yemen Crisis information, donations, and petitions (updating list): yemencrisis.carrd.co
Anti-Racism Resource Guide: allyresourceguide.com
RELATED VIDEOS:
→ The Ultimate Guide to Tense and POV: • The Ultimate Guide to ...
→ Writing Complex Characters: • Creating Complex Chara...
→ Anti-Heroes (@Reedsy): • How to Write Anti-Heroes
→ Anti-Villains (@Reedsy): • How to Write Anti-Vill...
→ Writing Unreliable Narrators (@Reedsy): • Writing Unreliable Nar...
MY SHORT FICTION:
☾"I Will Never Tell You This" in The Puritan: puritan-magazine.com/never-tel...
☾"Solarium" in Minola Review: www.minolareview.com/shaelin-b...
☾"Barefoot" in The Fiddlehead [print only]: thefiddlehead.ca/issue/282
☾"Wishbone" in PRISM international [print only]: prismmagazine.ca/2020/04/19/pr...
☾"Wishbone" video reading: vimeo.com/420052282
☾"Cherry and Jane in the Garden of Eden" in The Puritan: puritan-magazine.com/cherry-an...
TIMESTAMPS:
0:00 - Intro
2:08 - Not worrying about perception
4:25 - Worldview over action
5:20 - Interesting over likeable
6:36 - Creating interesting flaws
8:57- Creating sympathy
9:53 - Using backstory
14:30 - Unreliability
15:34 - Consequence
18:07 - Testing the character
19:18 - Empathizing instead of judging
MORE WRITING TIPS: • Writing Tips
WRITING VLOGS: • Writing Vlogs
WRITING CHATS & DISCUSSIONS: • Writing & Authortube D...
BOOK REVIEWS: • Recent Reads
Check out more writing and publishing videos from me over @Reedsy!: / @reedsy
OUTRO MUSIC: "l u v t e a [acoustic]" by Autumn Keys
SOCIAL
Tumblr: / shaelinwrites
Ask me anything: shaelinwrites.tumblr.com/ask
Twitter: / shaelinbishop
Instagram: / shaelinbishop
Goodreads: / shaelin-bishop
Shaelin: "I feel like most morally ambiguous characters are actually just heroes with sarcasm."
Me: Looking at you Deadpool...
the big-screen version of him
@@JD-te6zc You're right. Deadpool is pretty messed up
@Alfredo Zachary bot
@@EventualWarlord yeahhhhhh yep the comic version is a straight mf at times. real vicious.
Two simple rules.
1) You can't write characters that everyone will love. Just accept that.
2) If you really want characters to be loved, have multiple characters that varies and appeal to different people.
Zuko. That’s it, that’s the comment.
valid !!
I'll have to respectfully, yet ADAMANTLY disagree.
@@BoneheadGirl_
Oh? Explain
Honouuuurrr!!!
Breaking Bad really is a masterclass on morally ambiguous characters and subtext. The progression from mild-mannered chemistry teacher to "I am the one who knocks" is fascinating.
Write people, not characters.
Sorry Frodo
Ah, a fellow maurauder
Who is your favourite marauder? I'm stuck between... Remus, Sirius, Peter and James :/ (Sorry I have met like no one else who knows who they are, and I want to know other opinions)
@@crowhamill I mean you weren’t asking me but I found a fellow marauders fan… Remus is the best in my opinion, he has the werewolf angst, he was passive but still way nicer than the others when they were younger and a good kinda mentor character to Harry :)
I also want to add that your points are much more fleshed-out than I typically see from videos like this. I have such a bone to pick with creators who, say, mention a point, and then explain the point only by rearranging their phrasing like two or three times.
"Bland characters are something to avoid. A character without layers is not what readers want to spend time on. You HAVE to develop your characters, or people will get bored".
As an example haha.
That's such a thing I do when I'm writing comments or anything that I'm not going to edit. The thing is: Autism
I don't know how to phrase things so that people will understand, because while I just take words as their literal definition without any social connotation or anything, a lot of people will add a bunch of meanings to words that are purely based on their own experiences, and while a lot of people can intuitively understand them because they come from the same culture and they have prescribed the same very subjective meaning, because I simply don't do that, I don't know what landmines I'm stepping on and where misunderstandings will arise
So I always either under explain or over explain. I under explain when I either have faith that they won't misunderstand (usually after I've spent a lot of time in autistic communities because they just do) or I just don't want to write an essay. This almost always results in a misunderstanding because someone had a personal definition that corrupted the message
Other times, I overexplain because if I say this one thing in one thousand different ways, surely, even if I step on one landmine, most of the ways I explained it made it through and because it's 1 against 999, they'll forget about the one and understand what I mean (and occasionally, the person will pick a fight with the 1 and forget the 999 but most of the time it works but people get annoyed at my wordiness)
Not trying to argue with you or critique what you said. It's just the saying it in so many different ways resonated and I wanted to share
'Writing morally corrupted women is my mission in life.'
And instantly, your most anticipated written work will be your future memoir.
Just to be clear even if you aren't interested in writing morally ambiguous characters you should still watch Breaking Bad.
YES.
Now I wanna watch that
@@theunstablewoki6022
Curious if you saw it and if you did How was it its been a year.
Also bcs is just as good if you get past season 1 I like bcs and there are momments where it surpasses breaking bad but season 1 is basically the wtf do we do season to give them credit they do a decent job at hiding it but the writters behind the scene had no clue what to do outside of jimmy and chuck
I want to keep things spoiler free just in case
I've found that a good way to write authentic flawed characters is to draw from my own experiences or emotions. So for instance, the two protagonists of my last novel were, respectively, very manipulative and very stubborn. These are both things that I have been myself, at different points in my life, though not to the extent that they are.
Another way is to make their flaws and virtues stem from the same character trait. For instance, the stubborn character is an extremely determined person who'd move heaven and earth to achieve his goals, but that determination also makes him blinkered and unable to see any other paths, once he's decided on a course of action. The character trait is the same, it's just the situation that makes it a virtue or a flaw.
Great tips, thanks for sharing!
Exactly. I even started to make a list of character traits (both "virtues" and "flaws") and write how they could drive positively or negatively characters.
@@elisa4620 it's all about the situation, really. To give an obvious example, being an extrovert would be a virtue in a sales job and a vice in a remote accounting job. The character trait is the same, just the situation that makes it a good thing or a bad thing
@@zetaforever4953 I know, right! I've always thought that context makes all the difference :)
I think a good way to look at one of your first points is to see the reaction of the "Han Shot First" retcon.
The original version of Han was morally ambiguous to the point that many fans of A New Hope were disgusted that he shot someone for personal gain. Yet, when this was actually changed, just as many people were outraged about the lessening of Han's dimension as a character.
You're not gonna make everyone happy. You can't. What matters is that your characters are believable, and to accomplish that, fulfilling traits is necessary.
I personally think the shot first thing is a bit over dramaticized. Like if you look at it it doesn't seem like he actually thought gredo would Fire.
Also i get some prople see it as "aoh he is actually not that bad" but it's not like Han was about to abbanon Leia until he found out she has money.
But regardless I don't think it ruins his charater because it doesn't look like they had this big John wick show down it was really barely worth of note.
Especially since he shot first because he in self defense. He didn't con jaba he just lost his stuff by accident that's why he is wanted by Jaba.
But the tldr
-Han shot first because greedo was going to sell him out to a gangster which probably would kill him
- he was wanted by jaba which is how he got their even in the og because he was honest to jaba and had a valid explanation why he lost his shit
- it barely seems like Han knew greedo was going to shoot
We can't talk about the special edition but the Han shot first thing is actually not worth complaining about imo
I feel like I always make my characters too nice and they tend not to argue much or do nasty things. Idk I like nice people Haha but I feel like I should try this out
There's also nothing wrong with writing characters who are good, nice, pleasant people. If that's your style then go for it! Those stories are important too!
A lot of mine tend to be very confrontational, regardless of moral leaning. The paragon will call people out on their dodgy ethics. The anti-hero will chew someone out for not being pragmatic.
My characters are all really good friends, but there has to be some kind of conflict. Two of the main characters are best friends, but there's some conflict there as to race, secrets that can't be shared, bossiness and temper tantrums. Dig deep into the characters and you'll find the conflicts. Think about your best friends, aren't there some things that just drive you crazy about them?
I'm more into write flawful characters, also they tend to do a lot of nasty and "evil" things.
I think you can have both.
More often than not, there is more than one character in a story.
And depending on your plot you can put nice characters in situations where their moral code is challenged. People can be genuinely nice and not realize that some of the things they do or say are harmful.
I LOVE nice people too. But I also LOVE characters that are morally ambiguous and navigate a thin line between good and bad.
The "interesting" part made me think of Black Sails. A short series about pirates. It was a bit hard for me to watch at first, because we're kinda used to having someone to root for, someone that's in one way or another "better" than the rest. But in Black Sails, that person doesn't exist. You have straight and gay, you have thieves, you have murderers, you have liars and schemers, and backstabbing bastards. But not a single one of them are all good, none of them are free of at least one evil/immoral trait. Which made them all rather interesting, it also made it hard to know how things were going to go. Very interesting.
I think it's important to practice ambiguity through characters. I notice a lot of writers tend to put their own worldview in the characters to make it 'personal', but it comes off biased. Like it's not about agree or disagree, but right vs. wrong= no exception. Moral arguments shouldn't be polarized against one side, but there should be some representation on both sides in order to allow the reader to agree or disagree with the characters instead of being lectured or discriminated against for their own differing beliefs.
I love writing morally ambiguous characters, I only have to remind myself not to use too many of them in a single story
this was very helpful! my current project is focused on a morally ambiguous character. i’m hoping i can use some of these tips to improve my work :)
Mine is too but my story isn’t that good
Hope it helps!
I have a perfect way to test audience reaction to a morally ambiguous character. That is storytelling tabletop role-playing. Would the players continue to maintain an alliance with this character after they discover their darker side? You can also learn by playing. Who would you be willing to ally with in order to achieve your character's goals?
I know this character is from a tv show not a book but in my opinion he is one of the best Morally ambiguous characters. He is ‘Ivar The Boneless’ from the Tv show ‘Vikings.’ He is the son of the most famous Viking Ragnar and his brothers are great warriors and all achieve great things. Ivar was born with a disability that caused his legs not to work so he has to crawl everywhere. As the seasons go on his actions and beliefs get more extreme as he uses his flaw of not having Working legs in a time that was so tough and uses that to work on his mind and become one of the most cunning and intelligent people on the show. Long story short, he believes bending others to his will makes him more powerful to fill the void of not having working legs. Throughout the show he does terrible things like leaving his own son to die in the forest because his son was also born with deformed legs and you would expect him to sympathize with the child but then does the opposite and kills the child. Yet in the final season when he befriends this young boy, he stops being his narcissistic, violent self and actually loves and cares for the boy whilst trying to get his kingdom back. I didn’t do him justice trying to explain him there but he is in my opinion one the best morally grey characters.
I had an eureka moment when you said that flaws should come from worldview and not from a mere adjective! Thank you Shaelin!
To write morally ambiguous characters, think first of what heroes don't do, then think what is "too wimpy" for villains to do. For instance, most superheroes have a Code Against Killing, while a typical slasher movie villain will take out an entire high school body, one-by-one. An antihero would single-handedly wipe out a drug cartel without remorse but not a stoner or a sex worker, because "I'm after bigger fish!" or "I've got no beef with you." Or think about what is considered good and bad behavior in real life, then think about what behavior nobody knows or agrees is right or wrong, such as substance abuse, profanity, non-marital sex, gambling, etc.
I'm always a little bit jealous of you when I read your stories, because you write morally gray characters so well!
*morally gray characters! Not children! Autocorrect lol
a morally gray child is a very interesting idea tho lol
@@haloum I know this comment is really old, buuut I think you'd love Bug from The lies of Locke Lamora by Scott Lynch.
I keep thinking back to "Saul Goodman" when I watch this video.
As for pen and paper game alignment systems, the closest that I can think of that includes complex alignments is Palladium. Principled (Good), Scrupulous (Good), Unprincipled (Selfish), Anarchist (Selfish), Aberrant (Evil), Diabolic (Evil) and Miscreant (Evil). Feel free to read the overview of these alignments to get a break-down of how they interact with the world around them and their internal attitude to their place within it.
YES to all of this!
About the consequences gameplay: that might be a result of the code era of Hollywood studios. There is a lot we can learn from the cinema (Yeah, the 15 beat structure is great & there is a reason that video that comes up when you search is important, he says as he reached the 56% point of Jessica Brody's book!) The lessons we should not take from Hollywood is the code era & the restrictions that lead to some great Noir movies to counter some unnecessary handcuffs to storytellers. John Hess over at Filmmaker IQ has some good background information.
I think the result of generations of storytelling promoting the lie that bad actions need to result in bad consequences is the rise of Presidents that have never dealt with consequences & accountability being a foreign concept... Like 6 Bankruptcies before 70 years of life.
Belated Happy Canada Day, glad to share a Continent, there is just a lot of work ahead to, "Stand on guard for thee!"
Cool point about Hollywood, I didn't know that!
ShaelinWrites this is John Hess’ video on the censorship issue...
czcams.com/video/Ynf8BmfgPtM/video.html
In general your starting point is the Hays Code:
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motion_Picture_Production_Code
I'm writing a story with a morally ambiguous main female character, and this is so timely. Just the past week I had a struggle accepting the role of simps and of morally ambiguous women. It's such a challenge to navigate.
The character development in Breaking Bad achieved this very well Walt is a great example of moral ambiguity
One of the best imo!
I have to say, this seems like a really ironic choice of words to describe a morally ambiguous character 😆
EXACTLY! This video was awesome!
Another really wonderful morally ambiguous character that just fires on every level is Howard (Adam Sandler) from Uncut Gems. Almost every character is incredibly ambiguous, the movie is a masterclass on characterization, but Howard specifically is a good example of everything you got into here
Honestly, my grey(fuck off autocorrect. I don’t mean gay) characters are basically just Slytherins/carbon copies of Draco Malfoy.
I really enjoyed this video because I’m writing a story where my main character is sort of accidentally morally ambiguous and now I just want to accentuate that :)
Currently writing a “morally ambiguous” character, a woman in a fantasy setting who had her young sister stolen. The idea is that she does some awful things to get her back. And weather or not she was right to do those things is up to the reader.
This has been very helpful, thank you.
In my first drafts my character felt off. I was thinking in needed her to be less of a stand in for the reader and more of someone with real choices to make.
My idea has changed from “she does awful things to find her” to more of a goal based character. Her ONE true goal is to find and rescue her sister, nothing else matters to her, she may let people die, or manipulate them for her goals. Meaning that if a character falls into the wrong situation, they could die because of her goal, or she could even put some random person in a bad situation and not care. She would have favourites among the characters based on their usefulness or connection to her sister, but none are more important to her than this goal. as long as that character trait is maintained, no character will ever feel truly safe.
Shaelin, I was a part of a writing workshop this week. I wrote and edited a short story, The Charms of the Land of Far. Today was the last day of the workshop and I learned so much about writing vividly. I definitely want to explore morally ambiguous characters in my writing because they are crafted in a completely different way. Most characters that are morally ambiguous are unreliable narrators. I love how the protagonist can have multiple layers to its character. I write so ardently because it is my life purpose. I love you
I’m going on a binge for these. I listen to them in the background like a podcast as I stare into my vacant word document.
Quarantine’s killed my creativity. And I just flumped a writing contest. But thank you for rekindling my passion for writing!
"Nice person I'd like to hang out with them' Its dead to us- we're not even going to worry about it" Shaelin you are INCREDIBLE
3:36 I felt that, I always feel the need to make excuses for my characters. So I just stopped trying to write morally ambiguous.
This video... was a GODSEND. For the longest time, my character wasn't feeling right and my story was NOT making sense. This made me realize I was trying too hard to punish my character for one "bad" choice she made, AND trying too hard to excuse it through that sappy backstory you were talking about. And yes, I WAS overly concerned about making my character likeable. I think after seeing this video, a morally grey character is going to fit my story SO much better.
When she talked about giving a character a traumatic backstory as a way to explain a character’s cruel behavior it made me think through one of my own characters
After thinking it over I came to the conclusion it wasn’t the same thing because my character crosses the line, but in an attempt to prevent other people from going through the same thing he did
Hey Shaelin If I may, I have an idea! A video on how to write a villain or a morally ambiguous character *without* backstory ever being revealed.
So interesting to learn you like writing ambiguous characters since they're intriguing by doing unexpected things. As an instrumental guitar composer who composes/performs music for characters like that, I liked hearing your thoughts about one not worrying about others perceptions in order to convey a story which is important as a writer and as one of the musicians who are focusing on representing stories/characters with original music, i've also come to this realization so it was nice to hear you also convey that idea.
Also, I find its quite fun committing to ambiguous characters since special representations, ideas, and music result from this mindset that are different than what results from just representing clear cut "good" characters. Some of my most unique musical art resulted from committing to ambiguous characters which I'd guess story writers who also commit to such characters might find similar results and could even have fun representing those types of characters. You have great thoughts from a writer's standpoint and thanks for sharing!
Amazing video, it's so good to see a character that i love the most fit close to every single positive point or tips to how to do. Eren Jager from Attack on Titan just hits so many of those, he almost is my base to study this subject
Lolita by Nabokov -- great choice for morally ambiguous characters, not one, I'd go as far as saying that at least two.
Bro's a pedophile. Even if he kills that dude in the end, he's still horrible. He ruined Dolores' life.
Also I think that AHS: Hotel did this to perfection with all of those characters. It's probably why I binge it at least twice a year.
This came at the perfect time! Thanks!!
Insights on point as always. Well done.
So, how would I write the difference between "I'm selfish" and "I believe that all people will take what they can and run, so I have to protect what I have"?
Timely! Thank you. Honestly, the energy and down to earthiness of your videos has really sustained me through this draft.
This is going to be so helpful for my camp nano project-thanks for making this video Shaelin!
Love this! I‘m writing a novel right now with two morally ambiguous characters, your advice is really helpful, thanks!
Great video! Most of my characters are morally ambiguous for the very reason it makes them more realistic and relatable. We all have flaws and imo reading scripts or books with the “perfect” protagonist kinda just makes me roll my eyes
Thank you shaelin :) great video as usual. I'm in such a bad writing slump right now it's super frustrating and your video got me motivated a bit. I'll TRY to write know. Hopefully it goes well...
This was very interesting. You made many good points.
But I wonder about your point when you talk about the character's backstory. I feel that it is more complicated than that. While I agree that it doesn't excuse their wrongdoings, it is still a good way to explain why they are the way they are. When well done, I don't think it is cheap at all. Traumas are often the origin of a lot of maladaptive and/or morally ambiguous (or outright evil) behaviors. It creates twisted belief systems that are deep-rooted and hard to acknowledge and then equally as hard to change. Said behavioral patterns almost always end up being self-destructive in a way or another. Things you talked about in a positive way earlier in the video ...
And it happens a lot in real life. I know people who developed big issues (including mental illness) because of traumatic events in their childhood. And I think it is important to talk about it.
It also can raise questions: if the characters are the way they because of what they went through, do they or not deserve a second chance? Should we condemn them or should we give them an environment that could help them heal and change? Isn't the society/system/people that made them like this also to blame? etc.
I think this is kind of the point I was making. I wasn't trying to say that you *can't* include trauma or some kind of complex backstory for your villain, in fact many times it adds necessary and interesting context and texture to explore their backstory in this way. The point I was going for was just that if their backstory is simplified into a "trauma happened therefore they are evil" narrative, without the needed nuance, it can really cheapen the trauma and make it seem like a plot device, since trauma responses are more complex than this.
This helped me with something I'm working on. In my case the character isn't morally ambiguous, but morally at odds with the other characters
There were some tips that I found useful here, thank you for the video! 😁
I learn so much from your tutorials. Apologize for not msg you sooner. I've been a fan for about two years.
This makes me think of a quote I saw on Tumblr: If you want your female characters to be complex and have agency, sometimes bad things have to be their fault
I have written a screenplay that I will be self-producing and directing next year. It took me like five drafts to get to this point to where the two leads have differing worldview that lead to internal and external consequences. It took a long time to get my story to that point, but I knew it when I had it. Thank you for this, Shealin!
This was so eye opening. It’s really changed how I’m thinking of my characters
I tend to find morally ambiguous characters that don't have ANY views that I do annoying...but if theres one that has at least one relatable, if selfish or wrong, belief that I relate to, I will read them any day
I like the point you made about not judging the character! I do that too! It helps to change skin while writing. When I write sometimes I switch in between my characters I change skin between antagonist and protagonist a lot , try to feel what they feel if you know what I mean
Im writing a survival horror story about a young woman who is morally ambiguous. She's a coward in most of her actions but believes what she does is justifiable in order to survive. The story is basically a journey for this character to learn about her flaws and how her belief, while somewhat right in order to survive, was morally wrong, and she could've taken better moral route to accomplish it.
Your videos are all so helpful and inspiring and I’m so grateful for ur platform omg. I love that I can reference your videos in my critique group and just stan them all the time lol
That fact you reference my videos in your critique group Warms My Heart
Dang this is really helpful for the characters that I’m developing.
Preciate it
Glad it helped :)
Could you do more videos on dark themes in storytelling? Your perspective on this subject was alone was quite fun!
i don't really comment on videos, but even on a channel with so much extremely good advice, this video stands out as exceptional. i'm only commenting here so that this shows up in more people's recommendations. this should be essential viewing for people trying to write morally ambiguous characters
Great vid! Though personally, my favourite examples of this in terms of TV shows are actually The Sopranos, which has an entire cast of morally ambiguous characters, and The Shield, which has a corrupt cop protagonist. I'd also recommend the Korean crime drama movie Asura: City of Madness.
Great subject and tips - thank you. 😃👍💖💝
"The idea that people only do or believe bad things because they've gone through trauma is not only untrue, but also a little problematic. You've gone through something traumatic and then treat other people poorly like that's not an excuse." Amen, this is why I hate the 2019 Joker film. It's basically this obnoxious trope, combined with a really simplistic and stigmatising portrayal of people with mental health issues.
Not even half a minute into the video, and i already love this woman cause our goals align! Morally corrupt women are reason why i even write ✊ now imma binge watch all of your videos.
Thank you for this great video about moral ambiguity.
You honor, the judge Michael Desiato who is also played by Bryan Cranston. I absolutely love his character I think he’s also a perfect example
I haven't seen breaking bad, so I don't know who Walter White is outside of the memes... And I STILL agree with you that he's morally ambiguous.
This really hits on why I love these anti-heroes or morally ambiguous people. THEY MAKE US FEEL! Like a goody too shoes can be relatable too and there’s a place for that but those characters aren’t the ones that help me grow and question my sanity, unless they refuse to act because they won’t break rules then I want to shove them and that’s also me feeling. And villains don’t make people feel either unless they refuse to do something too, because most of the bad guys are known as ruthless, but it’s the people who fluctuate and aren’t always ruthless or calm that make us cry, laugh, cringe, just plain old keep reading.
Loved this video! Morally ambiguous characters are my favorite kinds of characters. Can we get that list of your favorite books with morally ambiguous characters, though? It's not in the description lol
Super useful! Thank you~~
I really like the "worldview, not actions" tip! Now the only trouble I need to overcome is thinking of some maladaptive worldviews! Trying to come up with one makes me less likely to think of one!
Dazai and Chuuya from bungou stray dogs are probably some of my favourite examples of likeable but morally ambiguous characters.
The characters in better call Saul are so good. None of them are good. None of them are bad. But there’s conflict between them all. It’s so good.
you look so beautiful here omg ♡(u always do but still)
This was a very interesting and helpful video! I view my main character as kind of morally ambiguous, but he might as well just be immoral for a huge part of the story. My main character is kind of a fascist, so his actions are a consequence of his world view. The reason why he became radicalized in the first place, is because he thinks that society has become too individualistic, he feels like he doesn't belong anywhere, and he wants his country to return to former greatness. His time in the military also influences his views. It makes him believe that all of society should kind of be like that: disciplined and collectivist. But another influence on his views is his gullibility. He believes propaganda quite easily. His hatred of the people he perceives as the enemies of his country's greatness make him violent and eventually murderous. However, he does always rationalize all the violence that he does. Because of his fanaticism and his gullibility, he soon gets a place in the inner circle of the leader of this radical movement. This leader, who later becomes the dictator once they win the civil war, takes advantage of the MC's gullibility, but also admires encourages his fanaticism. Their 'friendship' becomes quite toxic. Once MC has his place in the inner circle, he is determined to not disappoint the leader (and lose his place, or worse). His denial of the truth, which is that the dictator does things that cannot be condoned or rationalized (to say the very least) and that the MC should at least try to stop this, becomes his demise.
Very good but he sounds like a villain. For a military antihero, I would have him doing "Stripes" on-base and "The Hangover-meets-Eyes Wide Shut" behavior on his shore leaves, lol.
The title. We fucking love to see it!
Hello Shaelin! I have taken all the character development courses from Reedsy. I learned varied lessons, which are bound to enhance my writings.
I read your short story:
CHERRY AND JANE IN THE GARDEN OF EDEN
You really are an amazing writer. I learned many things from your videos and from Reedsy.
Your constant help influence me become a better author.
I strive for perfection. You really are a wonder!
Heaps of love😘
~Adrika
That is so sweet of you to say, thank you!
Your passion for morally ambiguous characters shines through this video especially when you used the B word! LOL! Love it!
Shaelin is glowing today!!
that a villian had to be punished by the end of the film was forced by the 'hays code' from the 1930's to 60's. similar guidlines were applied for comics (CCA) up until very recently.
I think the reason bad actions more often than not get consequences in books and movies is because it's comforting to think that the bad ones will get their due. You know. It's comforting to see the murderer get behind bars, and the rapist killed, and the bully get beaten down, and such things. It's that whole revenge thing. And if they don't get their due, something has to teach them a lesson to see the error of their ways, making them good. I think this is popular because it feels better that way. We know it's not like that in real life, but it's how we'd want real life to be, right? Making the characters more realistic and having them get away with things is more depressing I suppose. Even if it is more realistic. :P
True. I think the most important difference to reality is that the outcome has to mean something to the reader, be it satisfying, shocking, funny, surprising in a good way, there has to be something that makes the story worthwhile to be told. Shitty person does some shitty things, gets away with it and lives happily (and shitty) ever after tends to be not a meaningful story, even though or maybe even because it often happens in real life. Something remarkable has to happen in your story. This can be the bad person suffering consequences for the bad things he has done and/or beeing redeemed. It doesn't have to be, though, there are other possibilities. I think the ending of "Basic instinct" can be a good example how you can flash readers/viewers with a bad guy winning, whithout having said bad guy suffer consequences or redeeming him (I won't elaborate here for spoilers, those who know the movie will very likely get what I mean).
We all have flaws and all fictional characters brought out of the background to play a slightly bigger role must have them. Again a flaw is relative. We usually think of a flaw in terms of the author's perspective but it is in relation to the reader and this perspective will keep varying. The way to handle this is to surface inconsistencies and incongruities and the resultant controversies become food for thought with varying perspectives.
this is perfect for my short story, main character is a total mess haha. thank you!
There is nothing I love more than a short story where the main character is a mess !!
I needed this!
I love Hannibal Lector for this reason. He is inexcusable, and he doesn't excuse himself either. But he helps Clairice and stands up for her because she's helpless in a man's world. He teaches her to be a predator like him. Makes him so nuanced
Dara from City of Brass comes to mind ✨ 100% read on because of his flaws in a big way
Coming very late to this party, but I am not sure I agree with your definition and approach to morally ambiguous characters. For me, the classic morally ambiguous character is Dexter, a serial killer who kills because of a trauma he experienced as an infant when he was forced to watch his mother being brutally butchered. Dexter kills to relieve himself of his horrific pain BUT he kills despicable murderers that the police and the courts are unable to charge and convict. He never kills innocent people. he never kills randomly and he doesn't kill for any kind of personal gain. He kills because he must and although he is a sadistic murderer he is less evil than those he kills.
Dexter, then is the equivalent of Dirty Harry, a cop who behaved lawlessly to defeat criminals whose behavior was even more lawless. Both Dexter and Harry are anti-heroes who are bad but always better than their antagonists. and we DO root for them , sympathize with them , identify with them because while they are bad the world they inhabit is far worse. But while we may disagree profoundly with their moral universe, their actions in their own eyes (and in the viewers, I would argue) is not wrong or even ambiguous.
Dexter Morgan is given a "Code" by his father to help him channel his monstrous urge to kill. Dexter ends up alone in the end because he is the bad guy and is a villain. We aren't meant to excuse him anymore or fool ourselves into thinking he is different. He isn't.
Thank you!
You are so very right!!!
Is there any chance you could maybe do a video on “Inner Narrative” ?
2:29:
Villanelle: Are you sure about that?
I'll be that guy that contests you in the comments!
I'd say Elliot Alderson from MR ROBOT could go toe-to-toe with Walter "The Danger" White. Elliot is so wonderfully well written that at first, you may not realize how severely his skewed worldview drives him sometimes a little too far. Though, I do say this having not seen Breaking Bad.
But I'm watching it next and I can't wait! If you haven't seen Mr Robot, I highly recommend it.
Thanks for the video! Perfect timing, as I'm trying to dive into my characters a bit more to figure out where to take them. One of my antagonists is giving me trouble. He's one of those used-to-be-a-good-guy types and I'm trying to make his backstory understandable. This was super insightful!
I haven't seen Mr Robot but cool to hear about it!
I don't have to agree with the character or like them as a person to like them in general. For me what matters the most is if they're complex and interesting.
My favorite morally ambiguous character is Julian Blackthorn from the Dark Artifices series
Anime made me interested in characters like these haha
random but your jewellery is so nice
A morally ambiguous character is one that does selfless things through selfish means
Thank you
I'm currently working on a series that follows a group of vampires. I'm not going out of my way to make them morally ambiguous but there are a few of them that have not problem with killing and some that get enjoyment from it.