believe me, friends who are going to watch this video, even this girl recorded bad video, but she is the easiest video for understanding from the whole youtube channel.
This is right but there's more than one answer for the binary code. Actually for 0.4 the code could also be 00 and it would have something like 00.01.11.010.110. The word length and its average will be the same regardless of the binary code you've chosen.
thos is totally different while alloting binaries from back side , when i compared with othere videos , for the same question , i got different answers nd the codewordlength also different , which one should i follow , totally confusin
to explain details its very useful to learners and i will have a doubt how can you write of a code length 000 = 3 assume how what its aposibble to solve ?
The final answer is wrong while writing the CodeWord you have to allocate backwards ,Let's say you carry one from right side to left then you have to write it before the number and not after so if u are carrying 1 to a probability with 0 on left it becomes 10
Code allocation should be from right side... you've allocated from left...this won't be uniquely decodable for source Coding...as from Shanon criterion starting of one codeword can't be same as other codeword
If a codeword is a prefix of another, it does not mean that its not uniquely decodable. It might be; it might not be. However if no codeword is a prefix of another, it is guaranteed that the encoding is uniquely decodable. Example: take a prefix free code and invert each of the codeword (read them backwards). The encoding is still uniquely decodable (now you start decoding from the right of the complete source message instead of the left), however the codewords are not prefix free.
believe me, friends who are going to watch this video, even this girl recorded bad video, but she is the easiest video for understanding from the whole youtube channel.
I totally agree 👍 👍
@Sunil-siddapur yeah I agree with u it's not bad video it's audible n we can see all the content of it so yeah 👍
Easy to explain mam tq🎉 is useful content
I watched three to four videos but everyone answer is different for the same problem so how can I beleive
Except for the code allocation, this video has explained Huffman coding very well
Literally it was so easy to understand , tysm mam , you should be my college professor 🙇🏻
Fast and simple!! Thanks for this content
Thank you soo much you made easier to understand this even my lecturers doesnt told like you
Thank you for your explanation.... It just took me out of some pressure
I love you. There is Electronical engineer students also here. This is so important thanks
You said it simply and fast. Thanks
This is right but there's more than one answer for the binary code. Actually for 0.4 the code could also be 00 and it would have something like 00.01.11.010.110. The word length and its average will be the same regardless of the binary code you've chosen.
Bro please tell me how to calculate l
guys do we reverse the codes after we've obtained them?? for example 0.1 is 0100, is it the same as 0010?
Thank you , very easy...make more videos on such subjects plz
This is the best video I ever seen in my life... 🎉🎉
Thank so much akka💕 u help me alot 😁 tomorrow my exam . Tq u so much akka
Watching 8 min before exam 😅
Explained very neatly
Thanks. I had a quiz in 10 mints and this really helped🎉
thank you now i know how to do it
Thanks a lot mam.. Useful for me
Awesome 🔥🔥
code allocation is always from the right side But you have started from the left side
Need to be written in inverted order for code... Right to left...
such a nice explanation mam tq so much .............................................
Thank you so much to youu👀
Thanks for you explanation
Love the video
It was very helpful. Thank You!
really helpful thank you so much
thos is totally different while alloting binaries from back side , when i compared with othere videos , for the same question , i got different answers nd the codewordlength also different , which one should i follow , totally confusin
my teacher taught this for an hour and my knowledge was 0. Your lecture is lit✨
Bzoc it's showcased a wrong code allocation
Nice explanation mam
Thanks for easy explain and also post shannonfano code also sister!.
Thanks easy explain
thank you for this video
She left 4yrs back with good explanation. I think now she wd be having 3 kids and busy with daily chores 😂
You comment is 2 years back
I think now you enjoying old life grandpa
what a great speed u have nice
amazing video
ek hi video my sb points clear hogae
Thank you 👍
Madam ur voice made me to learn this 😁😍
Here comes simps.🤷
idiot
@@outsider9633 being a bad student isn't easy , join the club enjoy the study n life 😎
Thank you so much sister
thank uh so much
its wrong , after adding the answer gets more weightage than the same one in next line
Thanks ❤️
great...easy to learn ...thank you so much....
Its wrong
Veryyy well explained thankyou
Ikr!, Its "easy to learn"
thank you so much
How do you calculate (code) letters?
welcome so much
Thanks ☺️
Mi gusta tu Vídeos.
Thank you mam❤
Thank you
Nice
to explain details its very useful to learners and i will have a doubt how can you write of a code length 000 = 3 assume how what its aposibble to solve ?
Thank you mam
You have code "1" for 0.4 probability, which means that this is not a prefix coding. Please, check an algorithm and try again
thank you...
thanks for easy explanation
Too fast slow down
The final answer is wrong while writing the CodeWord you have to allocate backwards ,Let's say you carry one from right side to left then you have to write it before the number and not after so if u are carrying 1 to a probability with 0 on left it becomes 10
Thank mam ❤️
Code allocation should be from right side... you've allocated from left...this won't be uniquely decodable for source Coding...as from Shanon criterion starting of one codeword can't be same as other codeword
If a codeword is a prefix of another, it does not mean that its not uniquely decodable. It might be; it might not be. However if no codeword is a prefix of another, it is guaranteed that the encoding is uniquely decodable. Example: take a prefix free code and invert each of the codeword (read them backwards). The encoding is still uniquely decodable (now you start decoding from the right of the complete source message instead of the left), however the codewords are not prefix free.
@@harisasif2639even then this is not Huffman as Huffman is prefix free
Don't just write explain everything while assigning the code as it is the main part so keep improving
Code allocation should not be from the left, it will not make it a prefix code
Tq mdam
This is a bit difficult and rarely used. I suggest you to follow tree which is 100 times better than this
good...
Thank u
Please show ,how to write code word for each symbols
thank you very much maam🤌🤌🤌
We what More vedios mam
We will be supported by me and my friends mam
Codeword should be the reverse
Yep
Its wrong make it correct!! Do not share wrong information... Plzz
Thanks a lot🙏
Tq madam
🤝🤝🤝
U are teaching very fast
Mam I think u lost your CZcams account please start "easy to learn" channel again and pin to this comment. We are with u
How did u give binary can anyone say it
Is the formula for entropy correct? Shouldn't it be P(ai).log(P(ai))??
05/june/2023
🙌
✅
This method is wrong. The code should be written from the left and not from the right as shown in the video.
We want tree
Plss make your camera stable📷
l= code length , in the second we get pi as probability , eita is equal to efficiency and H =entropy
realllllllllly helllllllp!!!!!🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹
She doesn't follow the basic rule for minimum variance Huffman
How to find Huffman code?
Increase your voice volume
It must be reverse mam
The code word itself is wrong
thanks , we don't understand with devo
wrong method!
messed up as high and as low as possibility.
also the codes should be written before zerp and one every time
So easy !!
It's easy but its doesn't work with all probabilities 💔
Please check it once
Eng mathod is different
Please go slow
Please avoid posting wrong information
Explain properly
حد فاهم حاجة؟
It's wrong