Emma Watson & Daniel Radcliffe REACT TO Harry Potter HBO MAX Series Adaptation!
Vložit
- čas přidán 24. 04. 2023
- A new adaptation of the Harry Potter series by HBO Max has been announced, but the reactions from Daniel Radcliffe and Emma Watson to the adaptation don't look promising! Keep watching to get the latest update on the Harry Potter HBO Max series adaptation. Subscribe to Bopping for more videos.
Subscribe: bit.ly/3fU2JpC
#bopping - Zábava
i mean, the woman wrote everything so it is just right she is part of it - she wont let people ruin the books
Said Lucas when signing over Star Wars to Disney.
Lucas did the opposite of what she is doing. I have a feeling like she doesn't want to miss out on royalties which may add up to more than getting bought out (whether the new series is good or bad). @@shanecarravello2922
@@shanecarravello2922 And look how that turned out lol. Pretty sure JK is well off enough and cares enough to not let such a thing happen.
I hope she won't let people ruin the books, butshe allowed Cursed Child which is so bad.
Bella L
Just because you disagree with someone , it doesn’t mean you can’t enjoy something they made. She is my favorite writer and always will be . Agreeing and disagreeing is part of life. We all can have different opinions. In fact , diversity of opinions what makes it colorful.
She's not my favorite author but I found the Harry Potter books at a really dark time of my life and it really helped me get through it so those books had a big impact on me regardless of how of feel of Rowlings opinions, because they're just that, opinions and everyong can have their own opinions without an angry mob showing up.
@@gabblebabbles2017 to be fair, jk didnt express an opinion, she stated facts, its the transgender peeps that have this opinion about themselves, which is fine
@@SoSimonSays she stated an opinion as are you right now. I don't agree with her views but I can still like her creation. Hell Narnia was what started my love for fantasy and books and I'm an athiest. You can enjoy stuff seperate to how you feel on it's creator. And not everything needs to be an argument all the time.
J K Rowling is the reason, that millions of kids learned to read. Millions of kids who would normally have played computer games or hung out on the streets at an early age in just about every country in the world.. She is worthy of every accolade the British Royals or government could ever bestow upon her. All Emma and Daniel ever did, was to act out whatever was in the script. They did a good job of course but they got paid millions for their acting roles. What has either of them done since the Potter series? Nothing of any consequence and that will continue for the rest of their lives. JK Rowling is still moving forward and I am so happy that Rowling has now stated that the HBO series will be better without Emma and Daniel. Watson and Radcliffe will forever be associated with the Harry Potter series, which is great that they cannot forget and nor will anyone else, that all they have is because of JK Rowling.
@@gabblebabbles2017 CS Lewis once said If you look for truth, you may find comfort in the end; if you look for comfort you will not get either comfort or truth only soft soap and wishful thinking to begin, and in the end, despair.
There is only 2 genders and you cant switch. else you are living a delusional lie/life which leads to despair.
Why wouldn't fans want her to have a say in the production?
SHE created the story, and everyone loved it as it was. So why would that now become a problem? Disagree with her opinions all you want, you have that right (as she has a right to her own), but her work is still *her* work. and you liked it. as it was.
The only way Joann would allow HBO to reboot it was if she were at the helm, because (I absolutely guarantee you) the ONLY intention for rebooting the series was to infuse it with Woke, Marxist ideology.
Exactly! 👏👏👏
Well said
Bc of what she did. Plus she want really on set that much emma said in a interview "she wasn't really on set much. It was more like she was a on and off visitor."
@@anonymous_ginger what she did doesn't change the fact that this is her work. And being on set doesn't equal being involved. She gave most of the input before the actual filming began, when creative changes were being discussed.
She has a right to her opinion too. Without her, there wouldn’t even be Harry Potter.
Well said!!
Lmao Harry Potter without her is basically a different IP. She made the entire world and characters. You can disagree with her but it doesn't mean you now have control of her original material.
Agreed.
exactly, I never liked Shakespeare yet he is was an amazing writer, I loved the way his books have been portrayed by some amazing Actors and dare I say Actresses are we allowed to make a difference between the two now? Any way, Harry Potter would never have existed and filled our lives with such joy and angst if she hadn't penned it. She managed to get the right publisher, get WB interested, otherwise it would just be a book we read and talked about years later. Thats what the cast seem to forget thank you JK I am famous because of your book not HEY I am not interested in playing that role any more because of the comment you said one day. They owe it to her, and ought to honour her, with her we wouldnt even know Daniel, Emma and Rupert existed.
Im Tottally agree whit you! It seems like immature thoughts rule them! And also a great ingratitude!!
Facts!
Growing up with Daniel, Emma, and Rupert, it’s kind of hard to even think of someone else as these characters. Although it would be amazing to revisit Hogwarts and see what should have happened in the movies, I’m definitely hesitant, I would rather see an entirely different part of the Potterverse (especially something like the Marauders or Founders) than try to watch three different actors try to live up to the iconic trio.
I agree with you. There’s so much chance for backstories
@@greg5892 But, the globalists have to destroy all our icons (Indiana Jones, Star Wars, Star Trek, Ghostbusters, James Bond, Lord of the Rings, Marvel, DC, etc. etc. ad infinitum, ad nauseam).
They Did good job playing these characters but they weren’t true to books characters they made Hermione Granger perfect who made no mistakes they stole lines and great moments from Ron Weasley give it to her they made him look stupid there’s another side of Harry is characte that they didn’t show in movies and there are a lot of characters that didn’t screen time that they deserved
They don't need to live up to the movie trio, they just need to live up to the book trio. They could actually portray the trio accurately in areas that the movie version failed to do.
Yeah I grew up watching Harry Potter and reading it even though most if not everything was made before I was even born and nobody can deny that will compare the original to the reboot and I would love to see more about the marauders they are like my favorite characters
eh, Im kinda down. I'd be curious to see a more book accurate adaptation. I mean 8sih episodes per season, one season per book. That's 8 plus hours per book versus 2-2.5. I still love the movies. It isn't like they are deleting the movies. Making another version wont hurt anyone. If it flops, oh well. Not my money wasted, I can still watch the movies.
Or each chapter or two of its a short one can be an episode!
the later books are 20 hours but Id still watch that movie fr
I think the season will have a different ammount of Episodes
Yes.
I remember growing up with the cast and looking forward to the movies every year even though sometimes we had to wait two. But when it ended, there was a emptiness that connected to our childhood, that was kinda a rough pill to swallow. I think alot of us around that age group felt that when it ended.
Omg yes. When deathly hallows part 1 then wait a whole another year for part 2. Soo much money spent on the movies. They made box-office shut down. People were going crazy over it. We love you gang.
Yes when harry potter ended i felt really empty. I grew up with that show me and my family and friends literaly went to watch every movie that came in the cinema. Ill never forget it. I rewatched it again this month and im feeling empty again 😂
@@niro6492 oh yes. I was in tears when closing credits came on. 👏👏👏 made us all want to be wizards and witches.
Yeah I definitely agree. I was the same age as Harry when the first book came out 😅
@@kerimanasilasila174 Wait till you see how hollow you feel when they infuse this series with everything woke.
the castle design, tune and font are just parts of the world. You can't change something that's essential.
Exactly
Facts!
how are they part of the world? .. the original books had another font, the rerelease books had yet another font, and then came the movies introducing the tune and another castle design for the first 2 films btw... the series should definitely change all about the appearance of the world, otherwise it's absolutely redundant .. they want to imagine harry potter new, how about some imagination?
They could change them but it would be unnecessary extra work and wouldn't add anything.
The castle design and layout changed constantly in the movies
A TV series is a good way to tell the whole story. You simply cannot take 300 page book and make it into a 120 page script. The later books got upwards towards 900 pages. Things have to be cut out - unless every book is a trilogy. That has always been a problem for readers going to a movie. Having a season per book will give them much more time to try and tell most of the story. I hope they do a good job of it. 😎
I disliked the last 5 movies so I agree.
@@thelestrangelair what? xd. lit the best ones?. Lit when voldemorts moment beggins, the moment when the movies/books makes sense
I think it’s cool that it’s keeping the same music, castle and overall vibe.
Rowling is allowed her views on topics just like we all are allowed them. Many of us also have actual direct bosses that have opinions we do not agree with. That is part of being a human; living and working with people with different opinions to our own as well as those with similar opinions.
facts. rowling didnt do anything wrong, just gave her opinion like any other person on the internet.
@@kqshkin Agreed
@@kqshkin It was also an objectively correct opinion. "People who menstruate" are biologically women. Whether trans people identify with that or not is irrelevant to the fundamental truth. Allowing them the freedom to identify and present as whatever they want if it helps with their mental health by more closely matching their self-perception is fair enough, but if they can't understand that they're not actually what they claim to be (which many trans people are more than happy to recognise) then they are just delusional and we shouldn't abandon fundamental truth to cater to them; doing so would be like telling an anorexic person that they are actually morbidly obese and they're doing the right thing for their health by trying to lose weight.
Absolutely, these people are absurd with the level of fake moral superiority. You don't get to just shut people out because you disagree about something that isn't how the world works, at the same time they have no issue raking in millions on a cult of image and working with all kinds of sexual predators in Hollywood, quaint. Also, I read that original comment she made and it wasn't hateful it just explains how she doesn't understand it, and honestly as a European neither do I. It seems to me Americans are mixing up personality and biology and it's creepy. Also, from my perspective, the fact you have to pretend to see them as the opposite sex even if you don't isn't really conducive to anything and is a kind of thought police ( I personally would always use someone's preferred gender, but being forced to do it is a different matter). She did not call for any violence or hate or anything, and I support their rights to neutral spaces, and to express themselves and live however they want to, I just don't understand it and don't see why people have to pretend to protect their feelings when I and most non-American women feel that people like Dylan Mulvaney are making a caricature of women (guess our feelings don't matter, get back in the kitchen). I also find it creepy how in the land of oversexualized everything so many girls don't feel like women and many of the public men who become women become the same sex doll. As a woman myself that's the part I find fascinating and overlooked.
@@zmajoljupkatldr
I'm excited to see a new cast and a longer screen time to tell more of the books. I can get into Harry Potter without Daniel, Emma, or Rupert. But, I don't know that I would want to watch without JK being involved.
She's horribly transphobic. I'd rather watch it knowing someone inclusive and kind was involved instead
@@Beankean307 Ah yes, lets make a series without the books creator
@@angelorafael8103 yeah? I don't see an issue? Surely supporting the trans community is more important
@@Beankean307 no harry potter is more important
@@joshuahewitt4020 you really need to sort your priorities
She literally made the whole wizarding world, of course she shouldn’t be booted off because of her views. She’s not even transphobic, she just wants to protect female rights and terms. Her tweets aren’t even that bad.
I agree with you Rowling should not be kicked of the show, but she still is transphobic. it does not matter how polite she is in saying that your identity is wrong.
@@cheddar950 She's not transohobic, you've just been brainwashed into believing literally anything that strays outside the woke hive mind is transohobic. There are problems with the way the trans community is pushing for rights because they actively hurt other people. JK Rowling supports trans rights that don't hurt other people and is against the rights they want that hurt other people.
Preach!!🙌🏽
exactly people are too soft these days so what if she has diff views about diff things?
@@cheddar950 See, that’s the thing. She never said anyone’s identity is wrong. The fact you said that makes it clear you never read what she said. She said biological females deserve safe spaces in the forms of restrooms and female shelters. Women who are the victims of sexual assault shouldn’t be forced to share intimate spaces with biological males, regardless of how they identify. Same-sex spaces have nothing to do with anyone’s gender identity. Sex and gender are not the same thing. Sex is a biological fact; gender is a social construct.
Calling these people that hate Rowling “fans” is a real stretch.
Its her creation she worked hard to build the world we have all fallen in love with and she should get paid for it. From there i think its up to each person if they want to watch it or not. If you dont want to watch it because you feel it will support her because of things shes said, then dont watch it. if you dont care and just love the world she created, then watch it easy as that.
when i first watch all 8 movie i thought they were masterpiece but after that i read the book and man the book was so awesome and thought movie did some character injustice
Agreed. I read the books first and did not like the movies after the first 3.
Bella L
How could you be mad that the creator is involved with her own creation? That’s just childish. In reality, the actors care more about Rowling’s comments than the fans They just want to maintain their image.
The actors don’t give a rat’s crap about the fans. They only care about their careers… and, if they want to continue to woke in Hollywood, then they need to say what they’re told to say.
I don't care if JK is involved in the production or her personal views on issues. She is allowed to believe what she wants and it takes nothing away from the stories she created. Looking forward to a new series.
Do you believe "gravity" exist?
@@mgrdraco3857 And pray tell what does that question have to do with anything?
@@rogaldorn3525 I just want to be sure... Now poeple believe the earth is flat. They have 2737 genders... Man can be little girls... So maybe I miss the part where the gravity didn't exist anymore... And I can fly... 😂
@@mgrdraco3857 once again I am missing the part where this has to do with the conversation
The movies were great, and the actors will continue to get a lot of love and respect from the fans. However, that has nothing to do with remaking the series in another medium. We have to face it. The people who made the movies dropped the ball in a lot of places, which disappointed many people readers among them. They didn't show all the tasks in Sorcerer's Stone.. They didn't show the Mauralders back story in Prisoner of Azkaban. They didn't show what happened in the first two challenges, and they changed the maze challenge completely in Gobblet of Fire. They didn't show the week of OWLS in Order of Phoenix. They didn't show most of Voldemort-s back story from the Half Blood Prince . Not to mention Spew, nonverbal magic Ginny Harry full story. Quidditch .....Not everyone wants to WAIT. It is selfish for people who don't want it to impose their opinionss on everyone else. The actors can still profit from HP in multimedia such as games. I really respect Ralph Fiennes and Tom Felton for their support!!
That’s not what everyone’s up in arms about. What fans are worried about is how the Marxists have purposely ruined every other iconic series and character that We The People held dear.
Mark my words… that’s the ONLY reason they’re rebooting this series…
…to ruin it.
And they left Dobby out of so many books!
these new people who are gonna play in the series are never gonna be known for playing that said character. those are and always will be in the movies we have today. If someone new plays Harry Potter, he will never be known for playing Harry Potter. Same goes for Ron, Hermione, Dumbledore, Snape, Ginny, Sirius, Remus, Voldemort, Fred, George and every other character we know. These people are the characters of the Harry Potter series. Whether you like it or not. These people are taking a huge risk. They will no doubt get more hate than positive response and they sure as heck won't be as famous as the people playing the movies today
@@CorbinSwings Why not just give it a chance? I felt like they really messed up some characters (Cho and Ginna esspecially) and some movies could have been a lot better (4,6,7) and more faithful to the source material. Its possible to appreciate two adaptations at the same time
I just hope it doesn't become too modern' as it were. I hope it remains true and it would be wonderful.
Judging by the failed "boycott" of Hogwarts Legacy, I doubt that there is any problem with J.K. Rowling amongst real fans. The fans love Harry Potter - the story is timeless - and the writer of those stories will always be a part of them. Rowling is entitled to make a living from her own work. She is also allowed to have an opinion, just like the other side has opinions. No one should be silenced - and the fact that Emma and Daniel (who owe their entire careers to Rowling) refuse to participate because of Rowling's OPINION is pure immaturity. I'd love to see the series and even "Cursed Child" if they ever decide to do that as a movie. Oh, and I have Hogwarts Legacy - it's a tremendous game.
I get what you’re saying but not wanting to work with somebody because you disagree with them, I think, is perfectly within their right
@@SenkingFar Not wanting to work with someone (to whom you owe your wealthy lifestyle and famous career) just because you disagree with ONE SINGLE THING is absolute insanity.
If they said, “We hated every minute of working with her, as she was verbally abusive and treated us cruelly,” then I would understand.
But, to love her all your life and owe everything in your life to her, then turn around and say, “I disagree with her opinion on this one tiny, insignificant matter,” is the highest form of narcissistic arrogance.
@@AdmoreMethod to be honest, even if they did get famous off the series, it is in my opinion that they do not owe anybody anything. They are their own people and at the end of the day their opinions continue for nothing more or less than everybody else. Then again, you can feel free to disagree.
@@AdmoreMethodit wouldn’t be so bad if what they say they disagreed with was actually what JK said. However she is not remotely transphobic.
lol Daniel and Emma are also allowed to have an opinion. The same way Rowling is allowed to have an opinion. And yes, they're also allowed to not have the desire to work with her, regardless if it's because of one single thing or many things.
I want Harry Potter back😭. One of my favorite movies.
New actor for Ron please. so we see real romance with Ron and Emma, if Emma returned.
Not sure what that would like, but maybe a younger version of Viggo Mortensen. Let me play Ron, o look like a young Viggo!
We can't always agree with each other all the time, but can't we respect that people can have different points of view?
sure, if i say that my opinion is that we should return slavery (it's NOT, just to be clear), then you should absolutely respect that right?
“Harry Potter doesn’t need a remake”
~Oliver/James (Fred and George)
Bro jk rowling HAS to be present. Plssss! Like cmon man she spend ages writing those books and every little detail of the book . She deserves to be there . Besides who else will pick out the cast better than her ? She casted alan rickman as snape and see? That was awesome ! Pls pls she has to be there !
If people don’t like what J. K. Has to say they can just ignore her. Simple equation.
Preach 🙌🏽
Exactly. But the problem with the woke mob is that they have to complain all the time. They are never satisfied.
Yeah. The only reason she insisted on being in control was to keep all the woke, Marxist propaganda sh!t out of it - cuz, that’s the ONLY reason Hollywood wanted to reboot it - to RUIN it, like they ruin every other iconic story and character that We The People hold dear.
Right?!
And that's exactly what I do :) And also in my country I can download movies without paying for them, so there - problem solved lmao xD
You keep saying that "fans" are put off by Rowling's "transphobic" comments (she said nothing of the sort, she merely stated the fact that women exist, but that aside), but clearly your views are not representative of the majority of fans or the majority of people, and you are merely talking for a loud minority. As you noted, Hogwarts Legacy was a billion dollar success, despite the "boycott" lol. Turns out that a few hundred people on twitter isn't enough to sink the Harry Potter franchise. I can't wait to see this series be a smash-hit as well, and hopefully you people will get the message that people don't care about your opinions on Rowling and that most intelligent people support her, as they should because she said nothing wrong.
The only thing that will doom the reboot is if they gender or racial swap the characters in order to be woke.
@@AdmoreMethodthis! I love how many well written female characters there are in the books! I don't need them to give us a female Harry Potter, I want characters like Ginny, for example, to get their full personality and development from the books
Ginny was a b
I would love a TV series, but Emma, Daniel, and Rubert would always be the golden trio for me
let me play ronald weasly, i'll make the interaction with hermione better than him. trust me.
New actor for Ron please. so we see real romance with Ron and Emma, if Emma returned.
Not sure what that would like, but maybe a younger version of Viggo Mortensen. Let me play Ron, I look like a young Viggo!
Its easy to praise something which has no competition. Lets see if they respect the books this time.
@@aarengraves9962 where do you get those insanely good quotes from?
They really struck gold with the child actors for the movies.
I’m so ready for the TV series. It’s going to be exciting to see everything they left out of the books!
Same!!! Do you know when it’ll be released?? Also where can I watch Harry Potter 😅 (Srry for asking too many questions I’m just so excited )
@@moshposhy17 It will be released sometime in 2025 or 2026, and It’ll be airing on HBO Max.
Most fans don't agree with the loud ones complaining about Rowling... shouldn't even act like that is the consensus. I'm looking forward to a reboot. There can be a deeper dive into the world and characters with a television series. Better not make it woke too.
Every book fan likes to see a new Harry Potter tv show. Because we all know we didn't saw everything we needed on the screen. But of course movie fans doesn't like very much
@@eclipture exactly! The real fans who’ve actually read the books DO want this.!
Just watch them make it so the kids get to choose their own house.
Make your own uniforms, and maybe even allow a dementor to identify as a house elf!
Preach!!! 🙌🏽
@@eclipture I am book fan but original actors are embedded in the minds of those who grew up along movies and books. Recasting is a no go for me
this story deserves a more complete adaptation
The only reason I would like to see the show is, because they are able to show all the stuff from the books that were missing in the movies. But the movies and the original cast will always be No.1 for me.
I would watch that show and love every minute as long as it stays true to the story.
I agree with both Chris Columbus and Daniel Radcliffe. Getting out of that massive HP image must be a huge weight of expectation and failure to meet the standard for Dan, I know for a fact he couldn't bring out much success outside playing Harry Potter character so far. But for HP fans like myself, I would be absolutely thrilled to have the trio back one more time!
I will say All of Daniel’s other movies he’s done and Rupert’s characters in other shows are great tbh it just takes more people to go watch them and actually open up to it like they did for Harry Potter
Guns Akimbo and Now You See Me 2 were pretty great tbh
They should make them using all characters in the books. I would love to see peeves
Artists as owners of copy, have the freedom to deploy their visions until they feel they get it right - it’s the principle beauty of being a creator.
If they actually fullfill the promise of making it more book accurate, I can absolutely get behind that series. I read all the books, and watched all the movies, and if they make Ron the brave, competent and capable if lazy and easygoing character he is in the books, rather than the bumbling idiot that occasionally lands a lucky shot he is in the movies, I have no issues with having a different face attached to the character.
And while I know that basically everyone, including JK Rowling, disagrees with me on that one, I think Alan Rickman was the wrong choice for Snape, for multiple reasons, and I'm looking forward to see a portrail of Snape that doesn't downplay his vile and selfish actions in the books, and doesn't overemphasize his "redemption arc". I put the quotes here on purpose. Had I only watched the movies, I would see Snape as a hero and wouldn't be able to understand how people who know his final twist and sacrifice still dislike him. Had I not seen the movies, I would believe that everyone who sees snape as a hero and excuses or denies his actions is a child-abuse-apologist.
Remember, Emma Watson also shaved her head because her white people hair offended black people, even though it was a meme made by 4chan
LOL, really? You're joking right....right?
I feel like they completely missed the huge opportunity to appeal to the most active part of the fandom and do a Marauder series. It's been dominating the fandom for many years now, especially the fanfiction scene. It's also what you'll see most of on tiktok. There's so much else of the world of the potterverse to see and explore and there really isn't a single need to revist the Harry Potter books so soon.
But jk Rowling didn’t say anything transphobic, just basic facts, don’t go crying about it because 99% of people know she’s not a transphobe
Facts!!! 🙌🏽💯
yesss
Just study biology and you’ll see that those who want to destroy JK are as nutty as religious fanatics. Sex is a real thing, gender, well I have no idea anymore.
She said trans females weren't real woman and they are!! I don't agree with her views but I still love the series she created. She gave us something remarkable & you can't undo that!!
@@HPFangirl71 they are not, they are trans women. BIOLOGICAL MEN! You can identify that way and she would use those pronouns but biologically they are still men. That is a fact
Fans don't want 'Diversity', we want a faithful adaptation, not a woke trash!!!!!
The cancel culture is crazy, why are people allowed to have their own opinions about things anymore? Just because she's a celebrity is supposed to be held to a higher standard than normal people are? Then one has to question is being a celebrity is worth it anymore.
Jk rowling's explanations are key along the book details thus not involving her can cause aberations
Well!!! Transgender "women" aren't women. How hard can it be to understand.
It's probably hard for you to understand that transgender women are actually women. Just try to get more informed next time . See I love how many fans decided to still like jk books and stuff even tho we don't agree at all with her( basically she generalize in a negative way a topic that should be discussed more deeply. and a right knowledge in sociology and psychology should also be taken in count ). But I hate how some stupid fan, in order to defend her, forcibly changed to a negative and transphobic opinion on such delicate topic like this, that regard one of the most discriminated minorities( just see the horrible situation only in the USA) the people I hate the most are those who never cared about Harry Potter, but suddenly started to defend Jk just to spread more hate, instead of shutting up. This people in my opinion should open their fucking mind, and stop generalize the act of one trans person on a whole category of people, just like JK did. Because that is totally stupid (and this isn't even an opinion but fact).
if people like you do their research this wouldn’t be a problem
@@InspirationalWingedUnico-gf7vy Care to elaborate?
@@pyramusk3264 a biological sex doesn't automatically define you to that gender. If someone can't define their gender to their bilogical sex and starts their treatment to become women or men, they become women or men. That's what it is. Gender always existed nowdays we are just systematizing this knowledge. this is the result of research done not only on our population but also on past populations, on the psychological systems that affect transgender people in studies of decades in the modern-post-modern era
@@francescociccone1732 I'm not talking about gender roles. I'm talking about biological sex. You're either one or the other. But nice try.
They better keep it to the book. Seeing Harry with blue eyes again would ruin 10s of chapters of mentions. HIS EYES ARE GREEN!!!!
"His eyes are as green as a fresh pickled toad!"
Harry's Valentines song from Ginny in the Chamber of Secrets, though that song was removed because in the movies, Harry has blue eyes.
Yep.
One thing I hope they do is cast people like Luna and Sedrick before they main rolls, that was my main complaint with the original films how is it they spent 5 years at hogwarts before ever speaking to/about or seeing Luna even if they where in the background personally I think that would make it all feel a lot smoother and not like they read on book then made a film but like they read all the books and them made the films.
*Cedric
In the books, Luna did not appear at all before the Order of the Phoenix either.
@@ApacheMagic yea I’ve read the books now and realise that, but still I would like to see them before that time
I was just barley 8 years old when the first film was released. Growing up with the same people playing the same characters for a decade, besides Dumbledore obviously, I could never watch any remake with a different cast.
I would not mind if the HBO series actually happened. I heard if from somewhere that the series would touch on parts of the books that the movie never did, and that would be excellent for me cause i never read the books. I know they are great, many people told me to do it, but im just not too big on reading books. So a series that uses book material more in-depth, would be perfect for me.
It would be hard seeing different people playing on the Harry Potter TV Series.
But I have been wanting a TV Series for a long time because I want it to be just like the books. The Books was so much better than the movies.
Ryt sis
The absolutely ONLY way that a series, with such an iconic cast and story and everything, could possibly be justified to be refilmed, would be by making it in to a cartoon!!!
And they better NOT go Disney "woke" or woke at all!!! 😭.
I like the suggestions made; Founders, Marauders map, and Dumbledore would be interesting.
Must be a generational thing because all she did was express an opinion, one you can either agree with or disagree with. Apparently no one can express an opinion nowadays.
lol you do realise that people are ALSO allowed to have an opinion about her opinion right? xD that is what freedom of speech means, like how is it hard to understand? xD
Whats the point in remaking it anyway? It's not like the films are terribly outdated anyway. People still love them 20 years later.
Exactly
Let’s be honest, fans are going to deep fake all the faces of the original on to it and upload online just to mock this HBO series and call it a remake with “advanced technology of the 2020 era” like all those classic anime for their anniversary but less violence and brutality for the market and lost the 3 dimensional impact it gives when we watched it for the first time
I loved the trio eventually but i was so disappointed when the movies came out they looked nothing like i thought, i was like ten and it was probably my first book to screen adaptation but im holding out for the series ive been saying it would be such an epic tv show!!
There was so much missing from the movies and I was disappointed in the movie ending and I'm hoping that these episodes will bring to life what was not put in the original films
I'm autistic I love that they kept the same font and castle 🥺
I love that too, made me more confident in the adaption.
Just some stipulations: please cast a pretty Ginny this time and make her true to the books in terms of actually having a personality and a stunning Fleur.
true the actors were pretty but they didn't really match with the books imo
Ginny was never particularly pretty. And there was nothing wrong with the actress portraying her.
I would not blame the actress. for me, she was perfectly casted and had so much potential. however, the writers messed up by making her non-verbal - the love between harry and her felt so awkward because they haven't even spoken before. would be something the series could do better, but don't blame the actress. and lets not forget: ginny is still a weasley :)
I'm looking forward to the series, i love the movies extremly and usually i don't like remakes of anything, BUT something about this series feels right. I have faith in HBO because House of the dragon was absolutely amazing and if they keep up the quality with Harry Potter it's going to be the best thing ever!
Although a new adaptation will not bring back the WHOLENESS of nostalgia of the Books and the movies, I look forward to see this. If it is well produced I think it will start a new era for the Wizarding World and it may be a new experience for a new, younger audience.
Let's be real... this adaptation will probably be like the Star Wars sequels, the Amazon LOTR show, etc: loosely based on the original IP but with all of the unique character stripped out and replaced with what is politically trendy
YESSS I feel like i missed out on so much because Harry Potter was released when I wasn’t even born yet and it just made me feel like that I was born in the wrong generation 😭 but hopefully the new one will be just as good as the old one!
Im sorry but no one cant replace the old cast im sorry but this is my opinion
Harry potter is so much bigger than just one person. If they can’t tough it out with each other for the fans that’s on them, but having a book series almost complete without the last one done kind of sucks.
I personally for Harry Potter, and I don’t think it needs a remake. I think a better thing to do would be like a sequel, but with James and Willie, the founders and how they fell apart Hogwarts a Dumbledore I don’t just want a series that replays everything because that’s just boring to me. I am one of the biggest potheads ever I just don’t want to re-watch it, when I think of Harry Ron and Hermione, I think of Emma, Rupert and Daniel
I disagree that the people on twitter who say they won't watch a HP remake because JK is working on it are actually fans... It's why the "boycott" of the HP game failed. These people on Twitter don't even like HP, they're just people on twitter getting involved in any drama they can.
Yeah because Emma and Daniel are soooo great in the movies. Haven't seen a single TikTok video dissing their acting skills. This is a breath of fresh air, getting a season per book and letting good casting directors cast kids the way Jojo Rabbit, Room and so on have done
This is an opportunity for fans to get more details that we’re in the books but left out in the movies and I think it makes sense to keep the familiar theme song and the castle if your literally starting back to book one and JK Rowling needs to be apart of it so that way the books and scrips are on point to the story she wrote.
J.K spoke facts and wokies got mad. Now we may never see the trio return.
I think a new adaptation will be great!! I was highly disappointed in book 6. With a 10hr adaptation there will be no reason to not show Voldemort's past. The pensieve moments were some of my faves in the books but they were for the most part omitted from the movie. I'm also hoping they fix Lavenders character. She didn't seem as silly & frivolous in the books. They made her way more comedic in the movies. Also in the bks both the Dumbledore & Ron characters are different than depicted in the movies. Dumbledore is way more manipulative & conniving while Ron is a flat out bully throughout most of the series. My only problem will be accepting someone else as Snape. Sorry, but Rickman was the perfect Snape & he will be missed in this.
I was wondering what story they were going to do. would they do the original story again, show what happened durning those 19 years, or do something with the cursed child.
They will make each book into one full tv season.
@@RebekkaHay Unless the first season bombs.
Honestly I read the books before the movies i had a differ image in my mind for all the characters so a fresh cast won’t bother me, now whether they are consistent with the lore…. That I care. Otherwise give me more and more immersive experiences
If they don't stick to the books Discription, they are not being faithful to the source material. Isn't this the whole reason for the remake? Or did I get it wrong?
I would suggest in the new Potter Series Harry starts to identify as a woman and starts wearing dresses..Just to satisfy whatever group.
I am looking forward to this. But not looking forward to what seems like huge changes. The HP journey will definitely be a different one and less relatable amongst the original books (and readers). As someone who read and loved the books and watched the movies (and enjoyed them) but hoped for more details. This will be disappointing. HBO could ruin some childhood memories.😅
I’m certain that’s their goal.
I hope the woke culture will spare this one
They spare nothing these days.
I'd give it 10 more years before they do cursed child. I'd also wait another 30 or 40 to remake it. That way they could recast the main three in major supporting roles. It would be neat to see a 70 year old Radcliffe play Dumbledore.
I just started watching other movies and even Miracle Workers to get the image of him being 'the boy who lived' out of my head to appreciate him as a diverse actor, like Johnny Depp. I think he's doing well, but I want him to keep doing good until he feels confident in coming back to HP for The Cursed Child without it getting to him.
I am hyped for the recasting of the trio for younger versions of themselves in the TV series so that the books get all the little bits of information out. Who knows, there might be some even more information sprinkled in.
Jeff sneider is litteraly the worst source of this planet
I'm looking forward to new faces and more in-depth story of Harry Potter. A series and the movies would be totally different in my eyes.
The idea that the only reason to remake Harry Potter is to make money is INSANE. The choice to keep the font, music, sets and style is KEY - it's all essentially the trademark - the identification within the market - and it's nostalgic. It's almost as iconic as the characters and plot itself. The reason to remake Harry Potter has ALWAYS been (since Azkaban) that in stories this rich, long and complete - you CANT tell anything even close to the whole story in a film - not even in a two-parter. I can't wait and am very glad Rowling wouldn't let go - Hollywood and Disney have demonstrated over and over what they do and how wildly they deviate from original material if they have the freedom to. In a few decades they'll have the freedom to take all her ideas and play as fast and loose with them as their hearts desire - when her copyrights completely run out. Until then - well - thank whatever you believe in that the author is powerfully involved.
Also, I loved the cast of the films - but they did really wait till they found actors they really saw in the parts - I don't imagine they'll be less careful now. I'm sure they'll get great actors and we'll get used to them. The WORST thing that can happen is they'll suck - and then people might now watch. On the other hand it might be great. At least we have a chance to see it made the way it should have been. AND families will have 10 years of show that they can sit down together to watch. I like that.
I like the idea of the other prequel and spin off stories - Rowling has told us that she knew much more than ever made it into the films - but I think just like with GOT the right move is first doing the books right (and thank god their already completed > . < ) the moving on to other parts of the world and the other stories she already knows and then filling in stories for other parts of the world she knows. I love the fact that merch might include more of the Hogwarts library books... maybe someday a comprehensive A History of Hogwarts *____* But first - it really needed to be properly telling the central stories that started our whole vision into that world. And nothing has to be "downplaying" the original films. Everyone knows film adaptations aren't faithful - the question is always whether they are faithful in spirit and whether things were changed for time, cost, or politics. That is what fans fight about. And everyone knows the single thing book fans were most upset about during the WHOLE of the film series ...was the thousands of times and ways the films departed from the BOOKS.
The stupid complaint about fat people being set up as evil in Harry Potter is - well stupid. Who're the evilest people? Dursley's or Death Eaters? Even Umbridge isn't as Evil as Mr. Malfoy would have been if he'd been there. And forget about Voldemort. Meanwhile the skinny goodies Dumbledore, McGonegal, the heroic trio, . . . Mrs. Weasley, The FAT Friar, on the lower end at "pudgey" we've got Neville, ... I don't know who all else - I for one, didn't read the story that way. I read it as if I lived in the real world and knew that 1) I was reading about a specific part of a fictional larger world. 2) Though it was fiction, it seemed to operate similarly to the real world. Substitute science+technology for magic and you're not far off. And in the real world ... wait for it .... good and evil come in all shapes, sizes, guises and every other thing you can think of. ANYone can be good or evil, smart or criminally stupid. Reading the stories or seeing the films it doesn't seem like there's a statement about fatness either way. The only thing that tripped me up was reading it in the 2000s as I did - It caught my attention that they were being so blatant in their abuse. Rowling wrote what Harry thought - but he was 11 - 17, a boy, not exactly trained socially AT ALL, and had reason to think of his cousin and uncle in the vilest terms his immaturity saw. Also - it's never even implied that Harry/ Rowling thinks that the Dursley men are evil BECAUSE they're fat or proven evil BECAUSE they're fat - they are fat and they are MEAN and SELFISH and that is why they are evil. This one drives me a little nuts.
Ms. Rowling may be a bit nearsighted and misguided in her opinions, but she did create an absolutely beautiful and immersive world that soooo many people love. I'm a 52 year old gay man and don't agree with her but some things are being overlooked here. As for "inclusion", she wrote in many people of all types and races from all over the world, not just England. She alluded to the fact that Dumbledore was gay, and the story itself revolves around a mindset that was very active in Germany in WWII with Hitler instead of Voldemort. It is a tale of love and compassion to triumph over evil. As for depicting overweight people as evil...Really???? They just happen to be written that way. Petunia was tall and skinny. Voldemort, Knox, and Bellatrix were also skinny. This one is just simply ridiculous. If she's not going to let go of her billion dollar baby, fine. Just do it like the books with as little deviation as possible. Don't make the fans of the books mad...Again.
She is not misguided in her opinions though.
The people who get 'mad', are not the' fans'.
Men are not women. Women are not men. Why is saying that ckntroversional? World's upside down.
Who cares what the actors think, of course they do not want to be left out but that is not a very good reason to not do it, wanting to be "like Starwars" is a very good reason to not have the original director anyway close to the new project.
The movies are well loved and a pretty ok adaptation, the series could be even better as long as the stick to the books and do not change anything to acomodate Movie nostalgia or a political agenda.
WTF!!!!! About 5mins in, this show is saying that 'fans' are complaining that a new adaptation will have the original music?! i.e. Hedwick's theme, are you fucking serious?! I'd be livid if the new adaptation didn't!
I'm hyped !! I really want the series to take its time so that it can be different from the movies
Y’all I definitely would’ve loved to seen Harry Potter and the cursed child with all the original actors that were left and I’m grown up It would’ve added onto the story
Daniel can play James emma can play Belatrix rupert can play mr weasly
She wrote the books! It's her story! What is wrong with people.
I cannt wait for it.
I'm excited for this series because it'll be just like the books, so you can separate the universes.
I can’t help but feel that nobody would know or care who the “golden three” were and would probably be working at a McDonalds right now if it wasn’t for JKR and they’re being ungrateful entitled brats that’s just over reacting to what she said on Twitter.
I honestly don’t care who is in it I just want to be able to watch it but cuz out of ever single streaming service we have we don’t have HBO if the reboot comes in way later I will have to find a way how to get the money myself while also deal with other expenses
Im going to have an open mind when i watch this show. Cuz books had a lightness to the movies, and loved cartoons when i was a kid. So this will be very interesting to my childhood.
On one hand it seems pretty pointless, on the other hand I'm still about what they did to Ron and Ginny in the movies. Among others.
I'm siding with HBO here, IF they don't go down the same path as Disney and make white characters black to be "woke."
I just know that if they do that anyone complaining will get called racist, as if people to this day don't complain about Harry not having book accurate eyes (which there was an actually understandable reason for). If they say they're going to stick to the books then they need to stick to them as much as realistically possible
They should've done a spin off and portrayed the marauders era which I know is very much something the Potterheads would want to see.
I can't wait to watch it. Not sure how I will, but I look forward to it.
I agree with them, making a new movie would be cool. But doing the exact same thing might be boring, and the new golden trio would possibly have problems with people not liking the change.
You clearly didn't read the books, there is no way they would be doing thr same thing. The books had so much in them the movies didn't cover.
@@sourceactivation2176 Firstly, you’re wrong. I read the books, so don’t make assumptions out of nothing. Secondly, yes, they got things they haven’t covered, but that doesn’t mean they will cover it now. Also, I personally think it still might be better to use another topic they have covered even less, something that isn’t to much of in the book at all.
The books are so much better then the movies. They changed so much in the movies and left parts out that I was excited to see in the movie and they left it out. I thought most of the movies were a let down compared to the books.
@@isisaphrodite3585 true
@@Asili089 If they're going to do a new adaptation, a TV show is definitely the way to go, not a new movie. Yes, they could include stuff they excluded from the original movies, but they'd still be leaving a lot of important stuff out. There's just no way to include it all in a 2 (or even 2.5) hour movie. So I agree that even though new movies could be different, it would still be the same thing in that it would leave out so many important details.
I always felt the series would been better suited on TV with each season being the new book. There was so much depth to the series that the movies could never go into. I feel this is where Amazon went totally wrong with the "Rings of Power" series. I could easily understand if Daniel and Emma don't want to do because it is part of their lives that is done. However, if it is because they don't want to work with JKR because of her "Transphobe" beliefs is just ridiculous. First, JKR's views are not transphobic and if not for JKR, the duo wouldn't have the PRIVILEGE life that they currently have.
Also, there are a lot of fans who really don't. Also, the political correctness crap isn't necessary. I guess we have to rewrite "Tom Sawyer".
BRING THE OLD CAST BACK!!
It isn't that they want to stay away from rowling, they want to continue to be able to find work in acting. They don't want to be threatened on a daily basis for the rest of their lives. They are caving to the pressure put upon them by the terrorist groups.