A Fun Problem With Polynomials

SdĂ­let
VloĆŸit
  • čas pƙidĂĄn 18. 06. 2024
  • đŸ€© Hello everyone, I'm very excited to bring you a new channel (SyberMath Shorts).
    Enjoy...and thank you for your support!!! đŸ§ĄđŸ„°đŸŽ‰đŸ„łđŸ§Ą
    / @sybermath
    / @aplusbi
    ⭐ Join this channel to get access to perks:→ bit.ly/3cBgfR1
    My merch → teespring.com/stores/sybermat...
    Follow me → / sybermath
    Subscribe → czcams.com/users/SyberMath?sub...
    ⭐ Suggest → forms.gle/A5bGhTyZqYw937W58
    If you need to post a picture of your solution or idea:
    intent/tweet?text...
    #algebra #polynomials #polynomial
    via @CZcams @Apple @Desmos @NotabilityApp @googledocs @canva
    PLAYLISTS đŸŽ” :
    ▶ Trigonometry: ‱ Trigonometry
    ▶ Algebra: ‱ Algebra
    ▶ Complex Numbers: ‱ Complex Numbers
    ▶ Calculus: ‱ Calculus
    ▶ Geometry: ‱ Geometry
    ▶ Sequences And Series: ‱ Sequences And Series

Komentáƙe • 19

  • @georgesdermesropian1565
    @georgesdermesropian1565 Pƙed měsĂ­cem +7

    You made a mistake in factoring at 4: 36

  • @XJWill1
    @XJWill1 Pƙed měsĂ­cem +6

    This is straightforward using the Newton-Girard identities, which effectively convert three simultaneous high-order equations in three unknowns to three lower-order equations in three unknowns that are separable and easier to solve.
    e1 = x + y + z
    e2 = x*y + x*z + y*z
    e3 = x*y*z
    p2 = 5 = x^2 + y^2 + z^2
    p3 = 9 = x^3 + y^3 + z^3
    p5 = 33 = x^5 + y^5 + z^5
    Now using the NG identities:
    p4 = p3*e1 - p2*e2 + p1*e3
    = 9*e1 - 5*e2 + e1*e3
    p5 = p4*e1 - p3*e2 + p2*e3
    {1} 33 = e3 * e1^2 + 5*e3 - 5*e1*e2 - 9*e2 + 9*e1^2
    2*e2 = e1*p1 - e0*p2 = e1^2 - 5
    {2} e2 = 1/2 *e1^2 - 5/2
    3*e3 = e2*p1 - e1*p2 + e0*p3 = e1*e2 - 5*e1 + 9
    {3} e3 = 1/3 *e1*e2 - 5/3 *e1 + 3
    Solve {1}, {2}, {3} for real values of e1, e2, e3
    e1 = 3
    e2 = 2
    e3 = 0
    Vieta's formula
    t^3 - e1*t^2 + e2*t - e3 = 0
    t^3 - 3*t^2 + 2*t = 0
    t*(t - 1)*(t - 2) = 0
    So {x, y, z} = {0, 1, 2}

    • @XJWill1
      @XJWill1 Pƙed měsĂ­cem +2

      If we do not limit the domain to real values, there are other solutions. For example, there is a solution with e1 equal to approximately - 5.74. The corresponding values for x, y, z are one real value and a pair of complex conjugates. The real value is approximately - 2.37 but I will not list the others since YT's filter does not like decimal complex numbers.

    • @SidneiMV
      @SidneiMV Pƙed měsĂ­cem

      awesome solution!

  • @FisicTrapella
    @FisicTrapella Pƙed měsĂ­cem +5

    I'm really lost 😅 But I think there's something wrong in 4:36

  • @beaumatthews6411
    @beaumatthews6411 Pƙed měsĂ­cem

    Brain says 0,1,2

  • @nasrullahhusnan2289
    @nasrullahhusnan2289 Pƙed měsĂ­cem +1

    As the constant in RHS is small, by scrutinizing (x,y,z)=(0,1,2) or their permutations

  • @bobkurland186
    @bobkurland186 Pƙed měsĂ­cem +1

    does it count if you guess the solution?

    • @lagomoof
      @lagomoof Pƙed měsĂ­cem +2

      Knowing the powers of 2 (or rather one more than them) definitely helped with this. All permutations of {0,1,2} immediately work by inspection.

  • @phill3986
    @phill3986 Pƙed měsĂ­cem

    👏👏👏 👍👍👍

  • @Blabla0124
    @Blabla0124 Pƙed měsĂ­cem

    At 12:22 you set s = 3. How do you know this is the only solution? If you key in the equation for s in desmos, you see there is a root for s = -5.743...(etc)
    (s=3 seems to be a double root btw)

    • @lagomoof
      @lagomoof Pƙed měsĂ­cem

      WolframAlpha reports one solution triplet that is a real negative number and a conjugate complex pair, for six more solutions and then things get really weird. There are 12 further solutions that revolve around three purely complex numbers and their conjugates, but not all combinations are present or else there would be 48, not 12, solutions.
      All the above complex solutions are apparently roots of a nonic (ninth power) equation, which I think might be bit beyond this channel. Definitely beyond me!

    • @Blabla0124
      @Blabla0124 Pƙed měsĂ­cem

      There is indeed an issue at 4:36 (more people commented about this) and it changes the equations for s and p significantly. The thing I talk about is later on, so of no consequence for the solution.
      I think this clip needs to be redone (sorry)

    • @XJWill1
      @XJWill1 Pƙed měsĂ­cem

      @@lagomoof It is easier to use the Newton-Girard identities than to solve the equations directly.
      Then it comes down to a factorable polynomial of order 5, with a double root.
      (e1 - 3)^2 * (e1^3 + 6*e1^2 + 2*e1 + 3) = 0
      e2 = 1/2 *e1^2 - 5/2
      e3 = 1/6 *e1^3 - 5/2 *e1 + 3
      There is one real solution set for e1 = 3 , e2 = 2 , e3 = 0 which corresponds to
      the solution set
      x, y, z = 0, 1, 2
      which actually represents 6 possible solutions if all permutations are considered.
      The cubic e1 factor results in 3 more sets of solutions (with 6 permutations each).
      With 3 simultaneous equations for x, y, z of order 2, 3, and 5, we should expect at most
      2*3*5 = 30 solutions. That corresponds to a 5th order equation for e1 with 6 permutations
      each. However, e1 = 3 is a double root so that eliminates 6 solutions. So there are 4 sets of
      solutions with 6 permutations each.
      Of the other 3 sets of solutions, one has a real-value and a pair of complex conjugates. The
      other two are sets of 3 complex-valued numbers.

    • @XJWill1
      @XJWill1 Pƙed měsĂ­cem

      @@lagomoof It is easier to use the Newton-Girard identities than to solve the equations directly.
      Then it comes down to a factorable polynomial of order 5, with a double root.
      (e1 - 3)^2 * (e1^3 + 6*e1^2 + 2*e1 + 3) = 0
      e2 = 1/2 *e1^2 - 5/2
      e3 = 1/6 *e1^3 - 5/2 *e1 + 3

    • @XJWill1
      @XJWill1 Pƙed měsĂ­cem

      @@lagomoof There is one real solution set for e1 = 3 , e2 = 2 , e3 = 0 which corresponds to
      the solution set
      x, y, z = 0, 1, 2
      which actually represents 6 possible solutions if all permutations are considered.
      The cubic e1 factor results in 3 more sets of solutions (with 6 permutations each).

  • @yoav613
    @yoav613 Pƙed měsĂ­cem

    Why?