Why Shouldn't The Universe Exist?
Vložit
- čas přidán 12. 05. 2024
- Enjoy 10% discount and free shipping on all Hoverpens with code HOTU:
North America & other countries: bit.ly/HOTU_novium
UK & Europe: bit.ly/HOTU_noviumeu
--------------------------------
Written by Antonio Padilla
Check out his fantastic book here: www.amazon.com/Fantastic-Numb...
Huge thanks to Prof. Derek Leinweber for his visualisations at www.physics.adelaide.edu.au/th...
Narrated by David Kelly
Edited by Manuel Rubio and David Kelly
Thumbnail art by Ettore Mazza: ettore.mazz...
Sound Editing by Craig Stevenson
Animations by the superb Jero Squartini www.fiverr.com/share/0v7Kjv using Manim - MIT License, (c) 2020-2023 3Blue1Brown LLC
Galaxies, space videos from NASA, ESA and ESO.
Music from Epidemic Sound, Artlist, Silver Maple And Yehezkel Raz.
Stock footage from Videoblocks, Artgrid and Shutterstock.
Extra images from:
commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...
oac.cdlib.org/ark:/28722/bk00...
commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Vi...
00:00 Introduction
05:38 What Is Energy?
12:46 How Much Does The Universe Weigh?
25:24 The Nullpunktsenergie
45:06 The Cosmological Constant Problem
Enjoy 10% discount and free shipping on all Hoverpens with code HOTU:
North America & other countries: bit.ly/HOTU_novium
UK & Europe: bit.ly/HOTU_noviumeu
Always great content from u guys
I so want the meteorite pen but its 400 :/
Hello from Georgia, Tbilisi. Thank you for your great work.
Feeding a system that is already in rhythm with it's vibrations, can only create a new fold. The spacetime code is probably in the midst of some collision energy that is constantly feeding into this system of spacetime. Could we theoretically fuse matter so dense, that it serves to house consciousness by fissioning the the already super dense elements to survive the super long periods between universes, space time after it disintegrates.... Long enough to survive time recycling. Basic personality of success can be chosen to survive within artificial platform of super dense materials. 3 types, master warrior, master diplomat/lover and master creative/engineer only born within each timeline awaiting it to be born to master spacetime and all it's elements. Any other personality type you try to save through out time (scavenger for example for the failed/ celebrity for the success in social affairs) The more you try to save, the more likely that you change what's possible. So only basic personality of all times. Pure love which house cooperation. Quasi mortal unless the densest forms that can be forged.
These three types of mindsets are so universal (fighter/lover/creative) that it has 3 parts in the mind that help us master these levels.
53:50 allowing Time to do...?😅, Space allows things to do, Space allows for All things to Be..🎉❤
Greetings bedtime algorithm crew. We meet again.
Oh bro stop writing this cringe. You get to learn the most beautiful and mysterious things about the nature of our very reality, in a pretty elegant way, and you just don't care.
@@parentfake306Who shit in your Wheaties?
😂
It's our nightly meeting friend? How else did you expect to get into this exclusive public chatroom. It's like AIM from the 90's -00's
@@parentfake306oh my god shut up it was clearly a joke
The universe might not be real but me watching this video 100 times before going to sleep is going to be very much real
same, but for a diff reason. my problem is i’ll put it on when i’m going to sleep and then i’ll fall asleep during it and wake up and it’s fully played 😭 gotta find the part where u lost consciousness so u can start it back the next night
@@SoloDolohalways 😂
Ok
If you do that, you will stop existing
Maybe we are living in some sort of simulation after all :P
As a young man who wound up in the trades mainly because in school I had large classes coupled with ADHD and teachers who didn’t take their job very serious I didn’t learn as much as I could have. I am very grateful and have a lot of respect for the teachers like you who can explain things for people like me who struggle with learning and understanding things . Thank you
Don't feel bad Brother, the Trades are tangible and real, this stuff is theories and at this state, unprovable...you made the right choice
@@PauseQT. It's not about choices, it's about not placing limitations on yourself and expanding your own horizons.
Trades can earn you more money than any teacher earns. A plumber say can earn more money than any universty lecturer. A trade can make you self sufficient, independent and far more important.
@@Wallstrcrash2012 oh for sure brother. I’m sharp in my own realm. I’m a union ironworker. I use a lot of trigonometry (not that trig is Einstein material lol) to build stuff on a daily basis. I’m very good at my job I take home 150,000 a year. In school I had a hard time comprehending things the way the teachers taught stuff and they just kept moving on with the class instead of taking the time out to make sure I understood things. This guy in the video explains things in s way I can grasp which is cool.
I think anyone in a trade who knows what they are doing and is very good at his job should at least be bringing home 90 -100k without having to do any overtime.
To give some sort of idea of how large the Penrose number is: If each digit of 10^10^123 were written out with a width of 3 mm (about average handwriting size), the length of this number would stretch approximately 3.17*10^104 light years. This length would wrap around the observable universe 3.41*10^93 times.
The mass of the ink would be 5.03x10^71 times greater than the mass of the Milky Way galaxy.
The volume of the ink required could fill up the observable universe approximately 4.21 x 10^31 times. This comparison underscores the sheer magnitude of the number. We truly should not exist. But with enough time, I guess anything is possible
The god of the time gap or the god of probability gap. After many years, probability will happen 😅
Brilliant
@cc
In an infinite universe, dont they think it kinda HAS to happen eventually?
I get bitches?
In the first 12 minutes, you've explained more clearly the deep meaning of energy and inertia than any of my 61 years of study and interest have experienced. Thank you.
Agreed same in my 52 years of existence and I studied physics at degree level.
I learnt more In the first 30 seconds than I have In my 80 years of deep study. Thank you so so much .
How could you have been interested in this topic for 61 years and not have heard all this before? I've been consuming content like this for only about 20 years (I'm 40) and nothing in this video was even close to new for me... You should go on a deep dive about what gravity actually is.... it's crazy. In short you are accelerating right now (assuming you are sitting still) and the only way on this planet to NOT accelerate is to jump off a tall building or out of an airplane because contrary to popular belief you do NOT accelerate during free-fall. When standing still on Earth the Earth itself is getting in your way of following a straight-line path through curved space-time such that the Earth is accelerating you along a perpetually curved path... again, while standing perfectly still.
@@Chris-xo2rqAwesome comment bro. Glad to finally hear people debunking gravity "theory". I've been telling people for 40 years that they don't have a clue lol. Anyway, you seem well on your way in this journey. I hope you're finding happiness🙂
Sounds like you havent actually done all that much research in those "61 years" then...
As someone who's had the great misfortune of not having had any training in physics I want to thank you so much for making these larger-than-life concepts available to people like me. If my mind should wander even for a minute, I have to rewind, lean forward and pay careful attention to your voice and the amazing images on the screen. Thank you for making this mind-blowing field (in reality, fields) available to me. You have the best channel covering these topics on all of CZcams. Congratulations and please keep up the great work. Bravo!
Very well said! See it so also!
Yesss 🙌 if you like this, check out PBS Spacetime too. It’s my favourite physics channel, they have like 600 15-20 minute episodes on so many different subjects! It’s amazing
Indeed, well pit it all, bit perhaps it is good to keep in mind that big bang is one theory, pushed by most cosmologists now, while there are competin theories that sometimes even better fit the empirical observations and do not need the existence of dark matter of energy, ie stuff that we cannot empirically verify… and might indeed very well not exost at all, amd with web telescope recently seeing galaxies that cannot exist when the big bang theorists are right, there is a growing bodynif evidence that can put mich if the narrative in this docu,entary in the trash…
That said, the implications étc of these now dominant theories and points of view are indeed well explained in this video, and beautiful illustrated by the images as well. Absolute eye candy! --a dutch Beta person😃
👏👏👏👏👏
Second that
Cannot begin to explain how much I love these videos. Please don’t ever stop making them, they are without a doubt some of the best physics programs around and put most big budget productions to shame. Honestly think your entire team deserves some kind of prestigious award.
For this platform, this channel harbors some of the most intelligent discussion and debate on topics at hand. Much of it remaining civil amongst those with differing opinions. It's a real anomaly and greatly appreciated.
You know, I did always wonder about the other question that is raised from asking "how did everything come from nothing?" Which is "how do we know there ever was 'nothing' to begin with?"
We don't know that, and in fact, Penrose himself doesn't believe it. His entire Conformal cyclic cosmology (CCC) hypothesis is based on the fact there never was nothing.
the law of causality. Mass is a form of energy. Energy can't create itself. Even if cyclical, it still has to have a starting point
@Masoch1st What you're trying to refer to is the law of conservation of energy, which states energy can not be created nor destroyed, simply converted from one form to another. Which actually raises my question again; why expect "nothing" to be the default?
And, no, if it's cyclical there's no need for a starting point. That's sort of the entire implication of bringing up a cyclical nature in the first place.
@@Masoch1st First off, misstating the law of causality doesn't help your argument.
Second, you miss the point that anything ever created anything. It just always was.
You make an assumption something has to have a starting point, yet you have no evidence of that.
Lastly, if energy cannot be created, then that's a perfect argument for an eternal universe, and an argument against the idea of a nothing
An eternal universe theory does not explain potency. We clearly know that electrons and the smallest photons emerged into existence near plank epoch. Imagine an eternal pair of two atoms, that's basically it, did you imagine them moving and exchanging energy or creating new substances? No.
Additionally, Asfaik, the very notions of thermodynamics, it's three laws, are axiomatic due to the philosophy of science. So appealing to them as a universal to affirm eternalism is absurd.
"Sir, this is a Wendy´s"
Well played. I needed that laugh
Really? That’s the intellectual contribution you come up with for this video? A cookie cutter copy and paste meme that even a braindead 5 year old could come up with?
@@TheSCPStudioComplaining about a rando comment contributing nothing then here you are doing the same thing. Get a grip and take your meds
This channel is such a treat to watch! Your work is deeply appreciated. Thank you to everyone on the HOTU team!
Episode after episode in this series are amazing. I love the depth and the scholarship. The more the better.
Oil up old fella
I’ve been suffering from some major medical complications as of late that make keeping my negative thoughts at bay extremely difficult.
These thought provoking videos are one of the rare things that help. Thank you for the effort you put into making them. I really appreciate it
Sorry to hear about that, hope you get better soon.
🫶🏻 I hope things get better for you soon.
Get well soon! 🤜
Sorry but I understand. Been dealing with cancer forever and these videos help.
"The work of mindfulness is first to recognize the suffering and second to embrace it. A mother taking care of a crying baby naturally will take the child into her arms without suppressing, judging it, or ignoring the crying. Mindfulness is like that mother, recognizing and embracing suffering without judgement.
So the practice is not to fight or suppress the feeling, but rather to cradle it with a lot of tenderness. When a mother embraces her child, that energy of tenderness begins to penetrate into the body of the child. Even if the mother doesn’t understand at first why the child is suffering and she needs some time to find out what the difficulty is, just her act of taking the child into her arms with tenderness can already bring relief. If we can recognize and cradle the suffering while we breathe mindfully, there is relief already.”
Thich Nhat Hanh
As mentioned in the video, I would imagine the vacuum energy MOSTLY cancels itself out somehow, maybe by the virtual particle "ripples" constructively and destructively interfering, forming standing waves at certain frequency modes that may cause the outward pressure that is expanding the universe. Just a wild guess from an electrical engineer that is passionate about this stuff so take this with a giant grain of salt.
:D I love to hear theories
This is a wild theory that I wish I could do the math on
That is a very interesting postulation that we actually have the technology now to look for/test. Wouldn't surprise me at all to hear about such a study in a couple years.
Should chemistry be denied in the ready conversion of H1 to H2 merely because H2 is difficult to detect in any direct manner in space? A paper by Canadian astronomer Paul Marmet essentially collapsed the "Big Bang" back in 1990 as he theorized the existence of intergalactic and interstellar matter as the cause of redshift rather than a doppler effect -- and accounting for anomalies much more effectively, before the discovery of the abundance of H2 throughout space, though primarily ignored by the necessities of money and career support. An abundance of H2 throughout space in a gradient that will extend to meet that of our galactic neighbor, will also account for the gravitational anomaly where the outer arms of our galaxy rotate at nearly the same rate as the central region. Quantum physics is great, dare I say so before I have dived into the math. However math hasn't actually proven the existence of dark matter, no matter how sophisticated the math is or can be. Circular reasoning isn't somehow justified if you add decades of career building and funding requirements and the consensus building that takes place over time that takes on more precedence than any math in support . .
A much greater quantity of H2 in the presence of H1 is the natural result if we acknowledge basic chemistry, exceeding the mass of the visible component of the universe and which must be ignored to maintain control over the narrative and our inability to think and take a risk without group oriented behavior and identification in support .
Exactly right! Caused by the Casimir Effect.
50 points awarded to
Gryffindor!
I’ve seen a ton of videos like this but, this one in particular, was very well done. Thank you and subscribed
it took me 2 days to watch the full video and I still don't understand the complexity lol BUT it has made me curious and now I'm continuing to explore the topic. thank you for the video, it was fascinating!!
Consciousness is the Universe trying to work out how the hell it got here.
The universe accidentally started trying to work out how it accidentally started trying to work out how it accidentally started trying to work out how it accidentally started trying to work out how it accidentally started trying to work out how it accidentally started trying to work out how it accidentally started trying to work out how it accidentally started trying to work out how it accidentally started trying to work out how it accidentally started trying to work out how it accidentally started trying to work out how it accidentally started trying to work out how it accidentally started trying to work out how it accidentally started trying to work out how it accidentally started trying to work out how it accidentally started trying to work out how… ugh, my head hurts… it accidentally started doing things in a non-accidental fashion.
No it isn't. That is just another slogan to persuade people to not believe their lying eyes. the Universe was designed, and life was created. If life was so easy to make with lightning bolts and primordial soup, then we would have been able to create life from inanimate matter 20 years ago.
When the brain die consciousness dies. You will cease to exist. You will never see anyone ever again. All your memories and everything you know will be gone. You won’t even know you are dead. It could happen in your sleep tonight and you won’t even know
@@steelearmstrong9616 You forgot to begin your statement with 'In my opinion' bc, since you have never experienced death, you cannot know, and your statement makes assertions that cannot be proven.
@@allhopeabandon7831 Lol. I don’t do opinions. Everyone loves a fairytale, particularly woman who live in a world of delusion. Most and many will do and say anything to sleep better at night. What ever warms your heart I guess. Tomorrow is not promised. Tomorrow does not exist. Now is all we have. Age is not just a number. Age has nothing to do with numbers. We use numbers as a reference point as guid to let us know where we at in life or what stage. I am extremely fit and healthy and have good genetics but I don’t delude myself like most and say that I feel 20 when I’m actually 45. People love to sugar coat everything which is all is driven by fear. The fear that someday very soon that they will cease to exist. This is no way to live and you are not living. As I mentioned above, whatever warms your heart. 😊
These videos are so well made that even I, not even closely dealing with this subject and having the attention span of a zoomer, can spend an hour watching it no problem at all. Hats off to the team!
So well made huh....explain the water wheel at 7:35 going in the wrong direction to me. Or am I wrong.
Steve. You are wrong. If it went in reverse, how would it pick up water? Look at the shape of the buckets again.
@@mikejohnson55281Shirley you jest?
Or the cosmological constant problem, the universe would blow up, not collapse.
They got it entirely wrong, calculating the CC gives a positive result orders of magnitude larger than the measured value.
short attention span zoomers think anyone with a grating, archaic, eng ahhcent is smahht.
Always fantastic content. Such beautiful explanations, put simply & easy to understand. Thank you. Absolutely lovely.
“The entire universe should’ve been crushed by the weight of nothing”
The degree that this applies to me is astonishing.
You can randomly shuffle a deck and the likelihood of that deck being exactly in that order, would be 8.0658e67, or one in 80658175170943878571660636856403766975289505440883277824000000000000. An incredibly low chance. That doesn't mean it shouldn't exist. Pointing out the likelihood of humans existing is a bit misleading, as something else could've existed with an equally low chance, without making it "impossible" or that it shouldn't exist.
you made up that number
@@raidermaxx2324 No, it's 52!, or 52 factorial. Perhaps do your research before falsely accusing me?
Yes...and the improbability that a fully functional 747 will be the result of a tornado ripping through an airplane junkyard would be about as close to humans existing after a lightning bolt hit a mud puddle.
i don't think the universe has been around long enough for a deck of cards, much less everything else.
Should chemistry be denied in the ready conversion of H1 to H2 merely because H2 is difficult to detect in any direct manner in space? A paper by Canadian astronomer Paul Marmet essentially collapsed the "Big Bang" back in 1990 as he theorized the existence of intergalactic and interstellar matter as the cause of redshift rather than a doppler effect -- and accounting for anomalies much more effectively, before the discovery of the abundance of H2 throughout space, though primarily ignored by the necessities of money and career support. An abundance of H2 throughout space in a gradient that will extend to meet that of our galactic neighbor, will also account for the gravitational anomaly where the outer arms of our galaxy rotate at nearly the same rate as the central region. Quantum physics is great, dare I say so before I have dived into the math. However math hasn't actually proven the existence of dark matter, no matter how sophisticated the math is or can be . Circular reasoning isn't somehow justified if you add decades of career building and funding requirements and the consensus building that takes place over time that takes on more precedence than any math in support . .
A much greater quantity of H2 in the presence of H1 is the natural result if we acknowledge basic chemistry, exceeding the mass of the visible component of the universe and which must be ignored to maintain control over the narrative and our inability to think and take a risk without group oriented behavior and identification in support.
This was one of the most well written educational videos i have ever seen. This deserves some kind of award in my opinion.
the reward is the journey. the reward is the interaction. it is not the praise, or the made up medals, or the compliments. do not get it twisted.
and some people use it to sleep, it blows my mind... learning NOTHING, it's like going to a concert and watching the whole show through your phone screen because of tik tok....
but hey, people are free to do what they want... i guess
Need to listen to this many more times at this moment i will like to consider this as a manual ❤
Why? The fact that we exist is proof that this video title is wrong, I'm not going to watch it based on that alone.
this channel offers some excellent content. i envy kids who can grow up with stuff like this in mind
what i took out of this is that "Null Punk Zenergy" would make a great band name, or at least an album cover.
i jest.
I have watched this entire series multiple times. very informative, good for background listening as well.
You can call it NPZ if your are a thrash hardcore band from the 1980s. Like A.T.I ...any three initials
As I understand it the Cosmological Constant is like the tension on a guitar string, the string is still until plucked, but then the tension in the string is a catalyst to the movement and vibration of the string.
Light for example travels along this string which is as stiff as to restrict photons to the speed of light.
I guess it's "finetuned" in the same sense that at one particular point in time, when pouring water into a coup, there are exactly 10^22 molecules in the glass. From the perspective of the "10^22" this looks like a mystery how the water pourer was able to have exactly that many molecules in the glass of water. But it's just one point in time. Maybe our universe with all its "finetuning" is just a snapshot in time where everything just happens to fit.
It kind of is. Hell, there is a probably small "habitable zone" in the timeline of the universe, where just enough heavy elements were formed to make life as we know it possible, with the universe still being so warm that every rocky planet of the right composition would theoretically capable of hosting liquid water. If intelligent life developed there, it would likely wonder just how this could come to pass, how could it be fine tuned that it was so extremely friendly to life. But it is not. It's just a short moment in time just after the extreme violence of its birth and just before it expands and cools off enough so space turns cold and empty for the most part. Same goes for some theoretical guessing on the future of the universe. Neutrinos might be capable of interaction between each other, they are not massless after all. Not doing anything so far because the universe is too full and violent for them to make anything stable. But, this is just very far out there ideas but they are a good example for this thought experiment, in a very far of and to us cold and empty future universe, some exotic interactions might arise and create a second wind for the universe, a world not made from matter as we know it, but neutrinos. Theoretical life forming there, would look back at the universe (if it manages to, there is problems with this but this is just a wild thought experiment) and wonder how it came to be so perfect, so well tuned for it to exist. The "early beginnings" or our times, the age of stars and matter, being the violent birth throws of the universe inhospitable to them, but somehow turning into a vibrant cosmos just right for them to inhabit.
So yeah, I fully agree on that. The universe seems fine tuned, but really, we just live in the small slice of time that is hospitable to us. The vast majority of time the universe has being either too violent or too empty to make life like us possible. We are around just at the right time, not because it was tuned this way, but because it is the only time we are possible, and probability makes the likelihood for us to exist just high enough not to be impossible.
I also take exception with the "exceptionalism" principle, that states that we are not special. Well, we are not special in a deeper sense, but we should know by now that a lot of things aligned just right to make intelligent life possible on earth that it is very likely not to be common at all, even with the unimaginable amount of stars and planets out there. Even if life forms very easily under the right circumstances, it needs the right circumstances. Just the right single star, created from just the right composition of gas and dust, in just the right area of the galaxy, with just the right composition of planets, with a planet in just the right area of the solar system of just the right composition and size, being hit by another planetoid of just the right size and composition in just the right way to create a large moon of just the right size and just the right heavy iron core kickstarted by this and kept agitated in just the right way to create an electromagnetic field and the planet stressed and remolten just the right amount to make plate tectonics possible. And thats just the large events needed to create earth, excluding all the fine details. Even if in our large universe these events happen a billion, billion times, all of them together, in the right order and the right ways for them to happen are exceedingly rare. So much so that id you calculate the amount of planets kind of like earth for the Milkyway galaxy, we have good guesses on the likelihood of these events, you get a number you can count on one hand, at most low double digits. In a galaxy with somewhere around 100 billion stars. Thats mind boggling, and is also the reason why I don't see so much trouble with the Fermi paradox. Because thats just making the planet, not the complex and then intelligent life on it that would build a civilization. Because of these probability's I personally think that we are in fact sadly alone, not in the universe, but in the Milky Way. There very likely is a lot of life in some basic form out there, some complex even, but I do not have high hopes for intelligent life to be around in any reachable distance at the small slot of time we are around and capable right now. We are kind of special. A unusual blip in probability that took a whole lot of coincidence to come by, looking out at the untold billions of other chances that did not pan out. Which is another point why I do not believe in "design". If you throw one hundred dice often enough, at some point all would land with the same number up, it's just most likely going to take a looooong time. If you do hundreds of billions of these throws at the same time, it's likely going to happen a lot sooner and is a lot more likely.
Sorry for the rant, it´s just a fascinating topic and something that bugs me about current main stream science. The assumption that we are not something unusual despite the facts we have indicating that, yes, we are actually unusual. Not special still, but unusual.
@@theexchipmunk I like rants :D
I think the idea "we are not special" was born after the theory of evolution got popular enough but before we had good enough telescopes to discover planets. It's just ~30 years since the discovery of the first exoplanets and the 1980ths were full of the idea that there must be countless alien civilizations. While the creation of life is not that big of a deal (also just an issue of the "slice of time"), the bigger issue is about finding an environment where the climate is stable enough for billions of years. So, I'd be extremely surprised if we find intelligent life somewhere in the Milky Way (outside of Earth).
I am waiting for a clear indicator which *galaxies* would be suitable for life (just think of frequency of supernova explosions) which might reduce the number in the (known) universe a bit. But I also believe that the universe is infinite, with big bangs happening here and there.
@@lodepublishing Ah, yeah, the habitability of galaxies, not only by supernovas but also where you are (they might have some form of habitable zones too) is something i completely forgot about. That would narrow it down even further.
@@lodepublishingIt's called the "Copernican Principle"
The fact that it is fitted for so a short time increases the tunning and not decreased, because it demonstrate that even in the big perspective everything came together at the right scarcely available time possible.
And thanks God for that, for we need more faith to believe that nothing creates something than to believe in the Source of all creating everything.
Jesus be praised above all
Simplest and best explanation to the cosmological constant problem is that as our calculations predict something we cannot observe, the calculation itself is wrong. Either the prediction of the amount of virtual particles is wrong itself, or we have vastly overestimated their energy level. Or maybe it is related to the observation problem, the right amount of particles always being there where we make the measurement, but ceasing to exist or existing in much lower quantities elsewhere. Then, It is important to understand that the Penrose number doesn't describe the likeliness in which a universe is born, but the incredibly low odds that all of the known basic parameters in the universe are set to their precise values by a random chance. There's absolutely no way of estimating how likely a universe is born, as we have absolutely no idea what kind of event led to the birth of the universe. Maybe it was designed this way, which would be very simple solution to the problem. Maybe it's something entirely else, in which case we are forced to seriously consider the odds of our existence. Nothing we know gives us any hint why the universe exists, where it exists or what the universe is. Nor if the the universe is the pinnacle of the reality or a mere byproduct of something entirely else? How could you possibly say? And exactly nothing suggests anything of what kind of realms exist beyond the universe, or what kind of state existed before the big bang, or what is the relation of our universe to the realm beyond it, if such thing exists.
Does logic, mathematics or quantum mechanics exist beyond or pre-exist the universe, or are they only parts of our universe, born with it? How could you possibly even guess? Why does the existence itself exist? You could remove every single thing from the existence and still be left with the blank state of the existence itself. The existence exists and logically it has to be the most fundamental part of the reality. And yes, it's existence leads into a near-paradoxical solution: either it has always existed, meaning non-causality, or its existence is an infinite loop of cause and effect, which would be a paradox. Does logic exist beyond our universe?
And if we assume the mathematics to be the creator of the universe (which would postulate it to have some significant power of creation which we haven't observed it to have), we'd still be postulating a realm beyond the universe in which the mathematics exist. Mathematics certainly does not explain everything, because a) 'nothing' isn't 'something' you can formulate on, because at the moment you give it a symbol it becomes 'something', making it infinitely more than 'nothing' (nothing is a concept with absolutely no reference), and b) because mathematics can also be removed from the existence, still leaving the existence itself to be - not the other way around. Again, does logic exist beyond our universe?
What is the consciousness and does it exist beyond or pre-exist the universe? The hard problem of consciousness and its profound effect on the wave particle function forces us to acknowledge its existence and its mystery to the universe. Nobody has ever seen the universe without consciousness. We literally don't know if it even exist without the consciousness, or if it would exist in permanent superposition without it. it's extremely important part of the question of everything, whether we like it or not.
And every single thing i listed exist within the mystery of the universe and the existence, so whether we like them or not, they are strictly scientific and part of the question of everything, regardless if we cannot formulate them mathematically or test them. All this just shows how absurdly little we understand of our existence and how far away we are even to begin to attempt to answer the question or try to formulate a theory of everything. Unlike scientists like to admit, multiverse is actually absolutely horrible idea scientifically speaking, because it postulates almost infinite amount of unknown energy and arbitrary sets of laws just to solve a question which we are in no place to even begin to deal with.
And while we are at it, i would also shoot down the idea of string theories with a simple question: What scientific evidence are the 1-dimensional strings based on? a theory without predicting power or practical evidence is nonsense in scientific terms. it's not science, no matter if it involves numbers. certainly one can not prove god or gods, but also their existence is just as likely as any other explanation we can come up with if we are being real to the other explanations as well and not just gods.
Also based on what the scientists say that the matter and anti-matter should have been created equally? They don't know why the matter or the universe was created so how on earth do they say that there should have been equal amount of anti-matter there?
Thank you for sharing your thoughts with us. This was a long read but beautifully enunciated.
The only way these questions will be answered is with millions of years of study or if God gifts us with understanding in death.
Humans can’t see in dark and in higher dimensions so yours numbers in calculations are impossible to predict.
The chicken and the egg question of mathematics has always stuck with me. I mean, I have about as much of an understanding of mathematics as a squirrel does a pinball machine, but it really does make you think.
We're inventing ways to describe the things we see, but isn't that just the pattern recognition in our monkey brains trying to rationalize our surroundings?
But if mathematical principles truely do provide us the answers to the deepest mechanations of the universe, then how the fuck does the universe function on principles such as those?
Hurts my brain, I love it
Nothing we know gives any indication at to why all the parameters are tuned so that the universe exists?? Have you ever heard of a book called the Bible? In the effort of truthfullnes i am not particularly a religious person although I do believe we have a God I just take issue with the willful ignorance of that particular summation. Second admission I have yet to finish your entire sonnet and apologies if you do address this possibility at some point. Perhaps it is a bounce rather than a bang and a Supreme being is waiting for our species collectively to be a moral one. Or even stranger it's all dependent on one individual such as you or even worse, me to use free will towards morality and personal responsibility to decide whether life propagates the entire universe or just our one blue dot.
Love these videos as they always make you start thinking.
Like this video with the virtual particles popping in and out of existence gave me this idea-
What if our universe has already expanded and contracted, and these virtual particles are particles from other past and future big bangs.
Could it be that the multiverse is stacked open each other, and these particles are vibrating from other possible universes where that universe doesn’t immediately crunch back.
Or the Big Bang is happening over and over again; each time creating a slightly different outcome to ours, or outcomes where nothing can be formed.
So fast that those realities are unreachable as they already dont exist.
"You should not exist"
Finally something I can agree with
I simple love this channel. it truly enlights my day and makes me smile like "a little kid looking for pebbles on a seashore".
You lads next to Kurzgesagt and Veritasium are at the edge of teaching and making us wonder how our universe works?!
KurGesagt was stealing content not to long ago idk if They are a reputable source anymore
Kurzgesagt are garbage
125k views in 12 hours? There sure are a lot of us out here who anxiously await each new episode of this series
Thanks team
Yep simply because they are sooooo well made and always highly interesting
Priceless. Indescribably so.
A gripe from an ape with no physics background, but in awe of the mystery of the universe after listening to this amazing narration, is the use of multiverse in the end as the balancing factor which seems like an intellectual cop-out in all honesty, especially after the magnificent imagination and ingenious work that led to these indescribable discoveries.
Our current dominate models not only describe a multiverse but demand it. Also, the volume of our local universe is most likely infinite, which means any possible configuration of matter not only exists but is currently existing without end. Infinite civilizations of every possible configuration only bound by the laws of nature. Alright, I need to wipe now.
I smoked DMT once and I could literally see the energy around me, it was a mind melting experience. It shows you everything you see, hear, touch, smell, everything is not real... just what our senses allow. Existence is so wild ngl
yEahhh! I haven't had that experience, but yeah- Your words make sense to me. so cool
Undoubtedly one of the best, if not THE best, channels out there on the subject. Such high quality, concise content. It’s unreal that these are available for free.
there's no one better for this longer format. its not even particularly close.
SEA makes videos of equal quality
SEA is amazing. does anyone know if any of this is ai generated or is the voice actually his
AI bot comments are getting quite common across CZcams. Sad. For now, they expose themselves by the banality of the praise without addressing the actual content of the video, while still attracting significant upvotes and at least a few organic replies.
bootlicker
This is by far the highest quality content on YT... such great editing and perfectly spoken, fantastic! 😍🙌🏻
PBS Spacetime. Please.
As for the universe, it appears astounding to us. No proof that it is objectively astounding.
I mean, 93% of the OU is not even detectable to us.
We're astronomically insignificant.
He uses "should have" unscientifically.
I mean. PBS spacetime, it's great in terms of scientific facts and explanations. I love it aswell. I just like the type of stories and the fluent way that they were told here better. For me personally PBS is not as satisfying to watch compared to this content here, where i have not come across a single episode in which i haven't been "goosebumped" several times. Lets conclude it is one among the best channels besides and across SPACETIME.
Whoa, easy there buddy. Them are fightin' words!
BTW, how long did it take you to watch all the content on YT?
@@clancykelly5508 There's no way to use the word "should" scientifically, other than perhaps to express the expectation that a prediction about an experiment come to pass. Science is not concerned with what should be and has nothing to say about it. And if scientists find their theories in a conflict with reality so obvious that no experiment is necessary, then it's the theory that must change, being a mere work of man that has no prescriptive power.
It is awesome indeed. Congratulations.
I hadn't yet heard of the term "virtual particle" though upon the observation factors of the double slit experiment in which the observing instrument was switched on after passage through the slits, I realized that there was a sort of A.I. presence to our existence enabling the behavior of the particles to shift its own existence as well as its history within time of having just been, suddenly became and state of total being, undoubtedly pointed at least our perceivable existence, towards a simulation or virtual reality, in the sense that we are organic A.I. in a duality with technological A.I. which coexist upon one anothers construction of the other in an eternal romance for the ages...
I really love your videos. Great for both education and as background noise as it’s rather soothing
I’ve visited your planet several times, it’s an interesting place. This is a good educational tool, there are a few errors you have yet to discover. We discovered that at the start of the universe the antimatter was lost to an extra dimension that closed in the first moments, the dimension exists but does not interact with the 4 dimensions in a significant way. Also, black holes are not singularities, they are like closed filaments of gravitons, there is also a much higher “Hubble constant” at the interior - it’s like it’s own separate universe in a way.
I want whatever it is that you have.
Recent discoveries by the James Web Telescope demonstrate that you’re incorrect in your statements, and it is more likely that you’re taking old, incorrect, scientific information and using your imagination to make up false assumptions to fill the gaps.
Interesting how people take the unknown as “permission” to make up imaginative lies and then pretend that those made up explanations are absolute truth. As opposed to being content with not knowing until new observations and evidence can be collected to fill the gaps in our knowledge.
You forgot to take your antipsychotics, buddy. Stay on those, or you’ll start thinking you’re God again.
@@waido_ Think on this, there is a small chance he/she/it is for real. In truth, you never know.
@@Uthandol just trying to help, as much as I am permitted.
This channel is so genuine and well researched. Please dont ever stop putting out content. This paired with reading some good books is all I need in my life! Space is awesome
how do you know it's well researched? Are there references that you checked?
@@notmyproblem88 I have watched this channel for a long time. I also have a few books that I reference. One of them is "The Elegant Universe" by Brian Greene. And "Fundamentals of Astro Physics" by Donald D Mueller, Jerry White, and Roger R. Bate. Those are just my two favorite factual books. The Elegant universe is more about string theory than astronomy. I didn't go to college, however I've studied astronomy since about 2005 when I was old enough to access the internet. Unfortunately I didn't ever go to college because it is more of a hobby to me than a career. So just because I've read a lot of books and studied in my own time by no means makes me an expert. But I certainly have a passion for astronomy and physics. Sorry for such a long reply, I just want people to know that this channel is actually factual unlike most other Ai generated junk out there on CZcams. I believe the owner of this channel actually writes these himself as well as narrates them. He most likely has a team of people that helps him. It takes them a month or more to write each episode. Some channels like voyager will put out 2 videos per day and that's my first red flag when it comes to spotting Ai generated junk. Hope this helps! Have a great weekend.
Correction, the book is called "The Elegant Universe" sorry its 5am where I'm at. I go to work early :p
bootlicker
@@fireonthegrom2728 This comment is what I was looking for. Universe themed documentary on YT is produced in a big variety - some channels are actual physicists / astronomists, explaining the actual status of their science. Others simply try to focus on New Age and Aliens and explain why god / aliens / all-mind should be real and such... I don't say that this is all rubbish, but I'm looking for proven facts after all, not speculation or misinterpretation out of bias. I'm totally new to HotU, cuz I've been watching the channels in my native language, but HotU seems to work for me also. If this is really proven and well researched content, then I have to bow in respect to the creator(s). You may not consider yourself as an expert, but I count on your opinion as you seem to know by far more of that topic than me. Simply don't want to fall for another clickbait rubbish and actually learn something serious over here. So I appreciate your opinion. :)
Your documentaries are simply great. It's really hard to explain such hard topics in an easy way, matched with just a flick of poetry.
Great vid. Love the in depth content and easy explanation
I love this series. The BBC couldn't produce a documentary that could hold a candle to the quality of this. Complex concepts successfully broken down into easy to understand language.
Thanks to Antonio Padilla❤❤
We forget that Mainstream TV is geared towards the average person. The AVERAGE person.
@@eyeq7730its geared towards programming you into an obedient slave NPC worker.
Yes, it could/has already done so countless times.
When's the last time you properly watched a BBC documentary?
I love everything about HotU videos. The facts, the naration, the presentation, the tone of the voice, the pronunciation, and even the rythem of the speaking. It's all so well done.
This.
Yeah, there is such a component of awe in the whole presentation, it at times drives shivers down my spine. For a moment I feel like I nearly can get a grasp on the truth of the universe, a short glimpse on the wondrous and terrifying truth of the underlying mechanisms of the universe. It´s in some ways nearly religious, and I think a similar feeling to what religious people feel with their faith. Really, this kind of feels like a sermon at time, not in a negative way, and not to any faith, but to existence, it´s awe inspiring facts and mysteries and an appreciation of just how weird, wild and beautiful it really is.
And it really brings some revelations. Recently I when eating I was rolling around a pea on my plate and had a realization, this peas matter is made up from enough energy to destroy the majority of the city I live in. Yet it is lying there, being just a pea. I have known that for some time, but before then never "understood" it, it never clicked, if you get what I mean. And this channel manages to do that "making things click" for so many people, to be able to "get" these esoteric things. I never hat a problem with grasping these things, not always truly "understanding" them, but getting what they mean. But many people don´t have that skill, are not capable of just grasping these complex connections and understanding them. They get other things I don´t, like social interaction, but these extremely out there concepts are to them like seeing emotion and subtext in faces is for me. And this channel does the incredible service of making these things understandable, putting them in a way most people will have no trouble to understand and get them. And that is such a great thing to do, because in you normal life you will never truly come across these things, understand them without being invested and actively search out the facts.
Should chemistry be denied in the ready conversion of H1 to H2 merely because H2 is difficult to detect in any direct manner in space? A paper by Canadian astronomer Paul Marmet essentially collapsed the "Big Bang" back in 1990 as he theorized the existence of intergalactic and interstellar matter as the cause of redshift rather than a doppler effect -- and accounting for anomalies much more effectively, before the discovery of the abundance of H2 throughout space, though primarily ignored by the necessities of money and career support. An abundance of H2 throughout space in a gradient that will extend to meet that of our galactic neighbor, will also account for the gravitational anomaly where the outer arms of our galaxy rotate at nearly the same rate as the central region. Quantum physics is great, dare I say so before I have dived into the math. However math hasn't actually proven the existence of dark matter, no matter how sophisticated the math is or can be . Circular reasoning isn't somehow justified if you add decades of career building and funding requirements and the consensus building that takes place over time that takes on more precedence than any math in support . .
A much greater quantity of H2 in the presence of H1 is the natural result if we acknowledge basic chemistry, exceeding the mass of the visible component of the universe and which must be ignored to maintain control over the narrative and our inability to think and take a risk without group oriented behavior and identification in support.
Thanks for this mate. While I understand I'll likely never understand quantum physics, this helped me understand it a little bit better... I think.
Seeing my hometown @25:30 in a HOTU video is absolutely weird.
I've been at that place a lot, it still looks like it does in the video. Weird how times moved on but the place still looks the same....like a photograph.
Well Done! Great explanations about difficult topics. Loved the historical foundation, it made what you were talking about so much more relatable.
Your voice, cadence, and script are absolutely perfect for this content. The production value is incredible, and reminds of the best History channel documentaries. Thank you for imparting your knowledge onto us :)
No, absolutely not. The script is obviously AI generated.
@@Stroheim333 If it so, is the Script totaly bad? Its a serious question. Also because we can learn more about what AI is usefull for us.
@@user-li7ec3fg6h Dear, never pretend to misunderstand things when you try to "discuss" with me. If they use AI but pretend they make everything themselves, then it is pure fraud. Everyone can use AI, but nobody deserves the money or the honor they fraudulently can make from it.
@@user-li7ec3fg6hAI stops you being human.
@@Stroheim333I am new around here, really?! Didn't have that Impression this far
The chance for the universe to exist, for everything to be just right for things to turn out how they did might be absolutely, incredibly, mindbogglingly small, but the amount if stable (and failed) universes we have available for comparison is rather small.
The thing that fills me with existential hopelessness is the fact that the universe wasn't made for us. We're floating on a speck surrounded by infinite death, and we always will be. The universe was made for something else, something unknowable, and just like the living cells in my own body can never hope to escape it and understand the true "me", so too can we never understand what it is we live inside.
You're not wrong. But... maybe two things can be true. I'm in the beginning of my quest to learn, so I can't say anything absolute. However, multiple things may coincide. There's no meaning, and tons of meaning. Yes and no. Maybe research consciousness? We are more than the body. I suspect death is not the end, but a transition. A theory. xD I'm not trying to preach, oops. Just typing thoughts. All I know is, there's usually a spectrum for everything. So maybe you don't need to give up hope.
It’s a huge assumption to think the universe wasn’t made for us. Science can explain the what to a degree, but it never alleges to explain the why. “What is the Big Bang?” and “why is the Big Bang?” are incredibly different questions.
Stop letting an ungrounded assumption feed into your nihilism.
@@artOVtrolling Are you assuming it *was* made for us? Because if that's the case, I don't see the difference. They're both assumptions.
idk anything about cosmology so forgive me for saying this but, even if the universe wasnt created for us, then doesnt that mean that since we are evolving to the point of being able to go to other planets, doesnt that mean that we are participating in something BIGGER then we could ever imagine, meaning that just because the universe wasnt created us, we were created to TRY to become what the universe was proud to make(by accident). also i dont mind not knowing what we live inside, but i do mind questions like this.
Should chemistry be denied in the ready conversion of H1 to H2 merely because H2 is difficult to detect in any direct manner in space? A paper by Canadian astronomer Paul Marmet essentially collapsed the "Big Bang" back in 1990 as he theorized the existence of intergalactic and interstellar matter as the cause of redshift rather than a doppler effect -- and accounting for anomalies much more effectively, before the discovery of the abundance of H2 throughout space, though primarily ignored by the necessities of money and career support. An abundance of H2 throughout space in a gradient that will extend to meet that of our galactic neighbor, will also account for the gravitational anomaly where the outer arms of our galaxy rotate at nearly the same rate as the central region. Quantum physics is great, dare I say so before I have dived into the math. However math hasn't actually proven the existence of dark matter, no matter how sophisticated the math is or can be . Circular reasoning isn't somehow justified if you add decades of career building and funding requirements and the consensus building that takes place over time that takes on more precedence than any math in support . .
A much greater quantity of H2 in the presence of H1 is the natural result if we acknowledge basic chemistry, exceeding the mass of the visible component of the universe and which must be ignored to maintain control over the narrative and our inability to think and take a risk without group oriented behavior and identification in support.
Excellent presentation my friend!
We're definitely looking into some very big questions these days and the answers are putting up a fight.
My hope is that someone makes a significant breakthrough that will enable further progress.
Cheers to those who are willing to endure the frustration and inch forward.
The answer has always been there, to why there is a universe, and why we exist, but no one wants to believe it, tho it is the only one that makes any sense at all...
@@allhopeabandon7831 ?
Top shelf quality! You are creating some of the best content on the matter in my opinion! 10/10 as usual!
The most enigmatic bit is the impossibility of proving that it actually exists.
You can’t prove existence with existence. And Absolute Nothing(ness) is beyond our grasp, too.
So, for now at least, it is what it is - it is what we make of what we think it is.
One of the very best videos/documentaries I’ve ever seen on the subject of Physics in general I’ve ever seen.
Seeing a new video from you feels like finding a christams gift when i was a kid.
Your videos are fantastic. I don’t know the team behind this, but hats off to you. Love the Labrador/TNT comparison :D
as someone who struggles with depression and self loathing i couldnt agree more with the first sentence lol
The assumption that the energy of our universe should cause it to collapse on itself ignores the potential for mass/energy outside the observable universe providing balance.
Sometimes I wonder what would happen if we could go back in time and grab some of the great thinkers and scientists of the past - Archimedes, Pythagoras, Socrates/Aristotle/Plato, Isaac Newton, Leonardo da Vinci; And even ones closer to our time like Einstein, Planck, Fermi, etc. and _especially_ Nikolai Tesla (would loved to have met him) - and basically just catch them up to where science is now, fill in the gaps of their knowledge, put everything into context, straighten up their presuppositions, get them past anything stumping them and just slowly bring them up to speed and either leave them in the past to see how history would change (they'd probably be burned at the stake or ignored I imagine) or bring them to our time and let _them_ see how their ideas shaped the world and how far we've advanced - but also, with their powerful, unique, genius minds, let them start researching our current issues, questions, problems and roadblocks in science and see if and how far they could advance our current knowledge.
I mean, I guess that kind of gets into some philosophical questions like: Were they only smart for their own times? Was there something special about their minds and thought processes? If they were brought up to speed, would they be any smarter than current scientists? With the problems they focused their entire lives on now solved, could they progress any further?... And just many thoughts like that. I basically just wonder if there was something/anything special about their minds, thought process, methods, etc. to where they would be geniuses at any time in history given contemporary knowledge or, if their minds were just special/powerful for the times they lived...
Like, I'm not dumb but I'm not overly intelligent and certainly not a genius (maybe slightly above average since I've always loved learning while almost nobody else cares about learning/knowledge anymore) - I have a decent grasp on a lot of topics and some things that were cutting edge in history are now just taken for granted - _But_ I still think if I went back in time - even all the way back to ancient Greece - that all or most of those great thinkers would be a lot smarter than myself - and I think that's almost a given for any of the great scientists from say the 18th century on.
Very good question!
I’m so glad you all have changed your mind and decided to keep going with this channel! I’ve loved it from the very fist upload and was really bummed out when you announced the end of the channel on the last upload. This really makes my day! I really hope you keep going with the channel, not sure why you were going to end it, but II hope this video means that it will continue on.
any decision is usually based on $$
Or any other number of reasons someone might not want to do something.
@@loganh123456789with the built in ad how would it not be money.
Should chemistry be denied in the ready conversion of H1 to H2 merely because H2 is difficult to detect in any direct manner in space? A paper by Canadian astronomer Paul Marmet essentially collapsed the "Big Bang" back in 1990 as he theorized the existence of intergalactic and interstellar matter as the cause of redshift rather than a doppler effect -- and accounting for anomalies much more effectively, before the discovery of the abundance of H2 throughout space, though primarily ignored by the necessities of money and career support. An abundance of H2 throughout space in a gradient that will extend to meet that of our galactic neighbor, will also account for the gravitational anomaly where the outer arms of our galaxy rotate at nearly the same rate as the central region. Quantum physics is great, dare I say so before I have dived into the math. However math hasn't actually proven the existence of dark matter, no matter how sophisticated the math is or can be . Circular reasoning isn't somehow justified if you add decades of career building and funding requirements and the consensus building that takes place over time that takes on more precedence than any math in support . .
A much greater quantity of H2 in the presence of H1 is the natural result if we acknowledge basic chemistry, exceeding the mass of the visible component of the universe and which must be ignored to maintain control over the narrative and our inability to think and take a risk without group oriented behavior and identification in support.
Bro, I clicked on this video for answers and you left me with the biggest question known to man and gave me insomnia. Thanks 10/10 would recommend.
19:37 i remember back in the day as a youngster watching the static after reverery. It always looked as tho things were swimming in there.
I've got enough anxiety as it is.. imagine living in constant fear that the Higgs field might suddenly drop to its lowest energy state and at the speed of light proceed to tear across the universe ripping apart everything in its path to its subatomic constitutes.
One second youre here. The next, you're aromic dust.
You'd be gone before you knew it, so relax and don't worry.
Why would you be fearful of an end you won't even realize it happening. Because if it would happen (no reason to think it would) you would instantly be gone.
Should chemistry be denied in the ready conversion of H1 to H2 merely because H2 is difficult to detect in any direct manner in space? A paper by Canadian astronomer Paul Marmet essentially collapsed the "Big Bang" back in 1990 as he theorized the existence of intergalactic and interstellar matter as the cause of redshift rather than a doppler effect -- and accounting for anomalies much more effectively, before the discovery of the abundance of H2 throughout space, though primarily ignored by the necessities of money and career support. An abundance of H2 throughout space in a gradient that will extend to meet that of our galactic neighbor, will also account for the gravitational anomaly where the outer arms of our galaxy rotate at nearly the same rate as the central region. Quantum physics is great, dare I say so before I have dived into the math. However math hasn't actually proven the existence of dark matter, no matter how sophisticated the math is or can be . Circular reasoning isn't somehow justified if you add decades of career building and funding requirements and the consensus building that takes place over time that takes on more precedence than any math in support . .
A much greater quantity of H2 in the presence of H1 is the natural result if we acknowledge basic chemistry, exceeding the mass of the visible component of the universe and which must be ignored to maintain control over the narrative and our inability to think and take a risk without group oriented behavior and identification in support.
Kind of lame to say that Archimedes' conclusion was "just a fluke" IMO. I dunno why people insist on thinking "oh the ancients had such silly ideas it's amazing we ever got anywhere!" (I'm sure this wasn't your intent but in my experience it's a common conception and so I think that's how it will come off to a lot of people) Alchemy is a great example of this; they weren't exactly wrong with the whole "you can turn lead into gold" thing. It might not be economical and there might not be any reason to do it besides "because we can" but you can quite literally turn lead into gold if you have the resources.
Maybe 2000 years from now people will be laughing about how we thought matter was actually made of strings or brine or whatever.
2:14 I don't know what Penrose thought, nor much of anyone else , yet I am positive the universe has the low entropy it does, because it isn't random, it's designed to last until the one who made it or created it, not thru a loud booming voice, NOT A BANG, but almost a whisper, "Let there be light "
So, there is.
Deep thoughts: Even we have an infinitesimally small chance of existing.
Conciousness just have to exist.
As you didnt have to wait 13billion years after the big bang till you're born.
Neither you have to wait again for the X billions of years for your next conscious life to exist in different universes.
You will just exist in an universe that is ready to support life.
Just like how people say we are lucky we end up on Earth despite the vast majority of planets are inhabitable. My perspective is we just have to exist on a habitable planet if there was one.
So the probability of existing as a concious being anywhere in this universe is not near to 1/infinite. But closer to 1 actually.
Thank you for all that you put into these videos. They truly are special ❤
Another masterpiece of presentation, Antonio. If you are a teacher or a lecturer then you have very lucky students.
Please don't allow this channel to die.
bootlicker
This is an incredible high quality video. Thanks for your work.
Awesome content as always. Even now, I'm still trying to wrap my brain around how gravity causes time as a function of space, especially in relation to the accelerating expansion of the universe. This was an excellent primer/introduction re: quantum foam and associated theories, which really is needed to understand the current conception of spacetime in general.
Personally, I get "the ick" from string theory landscape/multiverse/anthropic explanations for why our universe *is.* It seems as selfish and nearsighted as pre-Copernican conceptions of "our" place in the universe. The observer effect is a bonkers mystery, but the anthropic explanation is as vapid as saying "because God."
I love how the little dog is energy equivalent to Krakatoa eruption 😂 I’ll never look at a little animal the same again
Thank you again for all of the hard work that goes into these videos
I like how CZcams recommends these type of videos at night
Light is an ordered vibration of gravitational quanta. Postulate 2. The gravitational field controls the frequency and speed of light in a vacuum.
This is determined experimentally using a hybrid fiber optic gyroscope (based on Michelson's experiment 1881-2015). Using a hybrid fiber optic gyroscope, the straight-line speed of vehicles can be measured.
It's simply incredible everything you guys do. Thank you so much.
The real journey is the existential crises you've discovered along the way. Thanks HOTU for such amazing content, I can somehow still sleep at night.
Best comment I've seen xD
Sir, this is a Wendy’s
My bad dog let me get a baconator
@@stephenbrennan4508Would you like some fries with that?
Go light on the salt that’s not supposed to exist
@@IR_Fuse_Live bitch we said fresh never frozen we ain't say shit about no salt but since you asked ok sir
No, this is Patrick!
This video is a perfect example of curiosity
I think that existence is fundamental. On an infinite timeline, everything exists infinitely.
That's my current theory/perception of reality
The narration , the content of knowledge and fact , the cadence and the music are all fantastic , brilliant . I’ve listened to the “ History of the Universe “ series again and again and have learned so very much .
The big bang theory is not fact. It is a guess
I also wish to blather on about the amazing quality of this beautiful video and how much it helped a simple man like me understand a bit of what top physicists understand and I wish to thank and congratulate the team of esteemed professionals who poured their hearts and souls into the creation of this masterpiece. And may this be a reasonable facsimile of other boring facsimile praise that are repeated in the billions daily.
Love the work y’all are doing
Thrilled with the new episode!
Thank you, HotU ❤
Universe is a paradox, and yet, it might just be something so advanced we might not understand, or ever understand, unless we can observe the universe coming to be, which we can't.
Observing it from the outside might help. How the hell you get outside I'll leave to the boffins
Hypothetical Question: if organized matter from one universe entered into another universe that was bound by different laws/forces (e.g. cosmological constant) would the rules/constants of the origin universe still govern the matter, or would the new universe dominate? The universe is constructed of matter/energy, therefore you'd be taking a piece of the universe of origin with you.
I suspect this is unanswerable at present, but I'm curious about alternate views.
Thank you channel for sharing interesting and interesting historical information
The answer to why we are observing this state of a universe is because only a type of universe that can produce observers will produce observers. We aren't observing higher entropy states because those can not produce observers. It's really not that complicated or hard to figure out. It is not a probability problem, it is a selection bias problem.
Do you sniff your own farts?
Interesting
I scrolled down to write this comment again. I don't remember watching this video or making this comment lol
@@jonasga XD I've been there. I'll admit the terms and wording of your comment went a little over my head, but still enjoyed the information and hope to learn more
Should chemistry be denied in the ready conversion of H1 to H2 merely because H2 is difficult to detect in any direct manner in space? A paper by Canadian astronomer Paul Marmet essentially collapsed the "Big Bang" back in 1990 as he theorized the existence of intergalactic and interstellar matter as the cause of redshift rather than a doppler effect -- and accounting for anomalies much more effectively, before the discovery of the abundance of H2 throughout space, though primarily ignored by the necessities of money and career support. An abundance of H2 throughout space in a gradient that will extend to meet that of our galactic neighbor, will also account for the gravitational anomaly where the outer arms of our galaxy rotate at nearly the same rate as the central region. Quantum physics is great, dare I say so before I have dived into the math. However math hasn't actually proven the existence of dark matter, no matter how sophisticated the math is or can be . Circular reasoning isn't somehow justified if you add decades of career building and funding requirements and the consensus building that takes place over time that takes on more precedence than any math in support . .
A much greater quantity of H2 in the presence of H1 is the natural result if we acknowledge basic chemistry, exceeding the mass of the visible component of the universe and which must be ignored to maintain control over the narrative and our inability to think and take a risk without group oriented behavior and identification in support.
While this is interesting, bear in mind we still don't have a unified theory for physics and as such, it's likely the case that things like dark matter, dark energy, antimatter imbalance, etc are the result of flaws in our modeling. The next 100 years of discovery should be very interesting.
The universe Will make due and cope until we come up with a theory .
17:50 there may be some truth to that one -- as far as we can observe the universe is flat, but like you stated it COULD be a sphere and it COULD be over 23 trillion light years in diameter
i think the only reason we measure the curvature of the universe from our perspective to be almost perfectly flat it could be that the visible universe is but the size of a 1 square foot patch of earth here relative to our spherical planet that is magnitudes larger -- sure the patch of earth is perfectly flat in relation to the patch of dirt its self but when you zoom out and compare that patch to the actual planet then it is but a tiny flat patch on a sphere (the big issue is that we cant see further than the boundaries of light so we can truly never know)
what a brilliant production! very thoughtful provoking and deep...
I think space, or this vacuum constant is what makes the universe have a sort of godlike presence throughout everything. Emitting crazy amounts of energy that appear out of nothing everywhere. And if cut up to plank length (or theoretically smaller) a big bang type of event worth of energy occurs. A omnipotent and omnipresent entity spread across the universe’s quantum realm.
Although I have a science degree and have been reading and watching documentaries about this for over 20 years I still can't wrap my head around this.
It surprises me that someone with a degree in science has difficulty with this. May I be so bold as to inquire what your degree was for. I have been an amateur astronomer for decades and I understand that some of the, literally, astronomical numbers are virtually beyond human comprehension (though I'd have to defer to the likes of Penrose for definite confirmation of this). The nature of physics has entered into realms of knowledge that are without doubt more philosophical, almost as though they have gone full circle from the likes of Plato and later Descartes.
@@mr4nders0n I have a MSc in Electrical Engineering so yeah I studied physics and took all the core classes (thermodynamics, Electromagnetism, quantum mechanics, etc.)
I did not say I did not understand on an intellectual level, It's just that everytime I still find it hard to grasp on an intimate/gut level. I still am fascinated and find it mind boggling considering how far removed from the way we experience the world and day to day basis that's all
@@HuxleyCrimson Juxtaposing intellectual understanding alongside "gut level" and "day to day experience" is something very few people seem to do, probably because far too many people get caught up in their own little shallow-minded, partisan, egotistical, sociopolitical mind games, even with regards to scientific theory. By being honest with ourselves, we can access far deeper and richer levels of knowledge in the hope of achieving at least some smattering of wisdom and that can only be achieved by using all our faculties, not merely "dry" intellectual understanding. No doubt gut "feeling" and "day to day experience" are "wetter" means of understanding and for those that understand things superficially tend to not juxtapose the way you do. The broader range of faculties we employ, the closer we come to truth. But the more we learn, the less we know we know, because the more questions are revealed and it seems that the growth in questions tends towards exponential.
@@mr4nders0n wise words. As far as my memories go I was always fascinated by astronomy and science in general, and I found it hard to relate to common earthly matters that I could not help but find utterly futile. From kindergarten quarrels to workplace drama or even international conflicts. I just had to look up to the sky in a starry night with wonder and awe, it gives such a perspective, and makes all of our problems look so insignificant.
I remember working with a former nuclear scientist/researcher turned programmer in a bank and I could not comprehend the fact that he could come to terms with living so "normally" knowing all what he knew after working on some top scientific programs at the time. I know I still can't. But as you stated it, it makes me trying to keep closer to "truth" all the time. In the end, if done right, one's ego should slowly dissolve in the face of such dizzying greatness of the universe
I just can't take cosmology seriously, I think "we" have a lot wrong.
It is profound, when you think that our world, is so unique as to support life, that it is not a far stretch to also believe that our Universe, is also, Unique. Great video.
"You couldn't exist." I took that personally!!
I wonder if someone some day will discover a way to determine the previous position of a particle and the amount of time that has passed since then, thus determining its momentum. To me it sounds perfectly sensible that with enough advancement it should be possible.
That is what we do already, for example in particle accelerators we almost never detect single particles, but we more or less ''see'' where they have been (and thus how and with what they interacted in a certain timeframe) and we can tell it was there.
This all is in some sense macroscopic and the uncertainty principle is something of lower scales, but it is very much a real thing we probably won't be able to just calculate away with logic and better measurements.
considering the age of the universe and the length of time the previous dominant species on our planet lived, I think we have plenty of time to improve @@jaspertuin2073
Eventually with this tech we could predict the future on a grand mathematical scale
Maybe the only reason dark energy hasn't destroyed the universe is because the particles only exist for like a single Planck time unit, basically popping in and out of reality too quickly and never enough at once to accumulate enough mass.
Dark energy was created to keep the Big Bang theory alive. Now with the discoveries of JWST, the big bang theory and dark energy is almost a thing of the past. Jwst has already found galaxies like ours in the so called dark ages.
Yeah the shorter the time interval, the greater the uncertainty of the energy... but... and I should really just look this up, but... I think the energy can be either positive or negative in magnitude. "Real" energy can only be positive but "virtual" energy does not have this limitation.
If the solution was just that half of the virtual energy is negative and cancels out the other positive half of all virtual energy, then I think I would have heard of this by now.
I read an interview with now deceased British physicist/lecturer David Bohm (Dec 20, 1917-oct 27,1992 ). He speculated about a quantum energy field underlying all space. He theorized that it was a disturbance within that field that caused matter as we know it to arise. Bohm said that quantum mathematics supported that one cubic cm of this field contained more energy than the entire physical universe. The interview can be found in a book written by Renee Weber called "Dialogues with Scien t ists and Sages". This video put me in mind of Bohm's astonishing statement.
Its sublime and hypnotic content and narration really got to ur videos been watching 4 hours straight and still can't get enough
You are a master of this type of documentary. I love every minute of all of these videos
This is so exceptionally well done. You're talking to us like adults, while being aware we know nothing about this stuff. =)
😊😂😂😂😂😂 ... OMG, THAT IS SO FUNNY!!! YOU JUST MADE MY DAY!!! YOU'RE RIGHT. HE DOES KEEP OUR ATTENTION, EVEN THOUGH WE HAVE THIS STUPID EXPRESSION PAINTED ON OUR FACES ... 😅
Many people have deep Knowledge, but it is really exceptional, when you can explain all those complicated things into simple, easy to understand concepts. not all the smart people in the world can do that!
Should chemistry be denied in the ready conversion of H1 to H2 merely because H2 is difficult to detect in any direct manner in space? A paper by Canadian astronomer Paul Marmet essentially collapsed the "Big Bang" back in 1990 as he theorized the existence of intergalactic and interstellar matter as the cause of redshift rather than a doppler effect -- and accounting for anomalies much more effectively, before the discovery of the abundance of H2 throughout space, though primarily ignored by the necessities of money and career support. An abundance of H2 throughout space in a gradient that will extend to meet that of our galactic neighbor, will also account for the gravitational anomaly where the outer arms of our galaxy rotate at nearly the same rate as the central region. Quantum physics is great, dare I say so before I have dived into the math. However math hasn't actually proven the existence of dark matter, no matter how sophisticated the math is or can be . Circular reasoning isn't somehow justified if you add decades of career building and funding requirements and the consensus building that takes place over time that takes on more precedence than any math in support . .
A much greater quantity of H2 in the presence of H1 is the natural result if we acknowledge basic chemistry, exceeding the mass of the visible component of the universe and which must be ignored to maintain control over the narrative and our inability to think and take a risk without group oriented behavior and identification in support.
Because so little is actually known about the universe it’s so easy for people to make videos like this. All you need to do is throw in some random numbers and say stuff like “100 to the power of 63 and 752 squared to the negative of 6”, then use some stock CGI footage, maybe throw in a couple of words like”infinite” and “singularity” and boom, you got yourself a “documentary”
Yup. And i also think that some of these awe infusing docu's are just subtle religious propaganda to catch some sheep.
In a lot of them you can find sprinkled in sentences like “Our universe must have been carved with a level of precision that just doesn’t make sense.” to indoctrinate the undecided and to encourage the believers. They often try to push you in the god/creator direction.