Nikon Z 14-24mm f2.8 S vs 14-30mm f4 S Lens Review | IT'S ABOUT TIME!!!
Vložit
- čas přidán 3. 12. 2020
- This is a REVIEW of the NEW Nikon Z 14-24mm f2.8 S (vs Nikon Z 14-30mm f4). It's been 14 years since Nikon originally released the 14-24mm 2.8 which changed the world. I LOVE shooting wide, it's made me a better photographer. The question is, is the 14-24 2.8 S worth the extra money over the 14-30 f4?
Check out FroPack 2 Lightroom Presets froknowsphoto.com/fropack2/ (40% off)
Download Sample RAW files froknowsphoto.com/nikon1424z/
Order 14-24 S from Amazon amzn.to/3mKG5Ei
Order 14-24 S from Allen's Camera bit.ly/3qtzD6W
Order 14-30 S from Amazon amzn.to/3oCd6Dx
Order 14-30 S from Allen's Camera bit.ly/3quVNWI
I'm GIVING AWAY A CAMERA VALUED UP TO $4,999!!! Enter the SUper HUGER Camera Giveaway right here bit.ly/megafro2020
NEW FroPack 2 Lightroom Presets
froknowsphoto.com/fropack2/ (40% off)
Download MyGearVault mygearvault.com/#download
Get a FREE Guide To Capturing Motion In Low Light Situations froknowsphoto.com/ (look for the orange box)
USE CODE FroKnowsPhoto at squarespace.com/froknowsphoto to get your 14 day FREE Trial.
___________________________________________
Gear I USE
I SHOOT RAW T-Shirts store.froknowsphoto.com/
My Go To Mirrorless Camera as of now
Sony a7R IV amzn.to/2PfcTaA
Sony a9 II amzn.to/2poUpdr
SIGMA 35mm f1.2 amzn.to/2rLO8Jr (FAVE LENS)
Nikon Z6 bit.ly/2FcKsWJ
The Microphone I use for Vlogging bit.ly/2LWGRPq
Nikon 70-200 2.8 bit.ly/2OBsjmY
Nikon 24-70 2.8 VR bit.ly/2LLHdsQ
Nikon 14-24 2.8 bit.ly/2LK1NtU
Nikon 105 F1.4 bit.ly/2vttwUq
Sony a7 III bit.ly/2n3HaK8
My Rolling Bag Of Choice For Flying bit.ly/2LNsHRK
Follow me
►CZcams: bit.ly/frotube
►Facebook: / froknowsphoto
►Instagram: / jaredpolin
►Twitter: / froknowsphoto
Please help us continue to make FREE content
by purchasing one or all of the FroKnowsPhoto
Educational guides. To check out previews of
each guide click here.
►froknowsphoto.com/guides
#FroKnowsPhoto #Nikon #Review
I LOVE NIKON!!!!
But we shoot Sony! 😂
The man with 6 R5 say that !
I am buying an OG Z6.
I guess you are back on Madeline's good side???
How did you get Z6ii NEF files into LR, doesn't seem to be supported yet...?
I love how articulate you are whenever you speak about things like lens! Amazing clarity and information man! 💯✔🔥
I've been waiting a long time for the 14-24mm 2.8 I pre-ordered it got it and
I absolutely love it!... The photos, the video that comes out of it, the colours are phenomenal Nikon Z Mount glass is what's keeping me on with Nikon
That and the files are phenomenally good to work with
Being a landscape photographer not shooting wide open (no astro photography!) I would go with the f4 as it is more compact, lighter and the IC is good enough. I also don't care about colored rings, I prefer the understatement of the new S line lenses. I can read and understand the difference of f2.8 vs f4. The S Line stands for good mechanical and optical build quality using high quality materials, and there is even a big difference in plastics by the way, and a constant aperture over the entire zoom range.
As usual great job!! I always stay to the end to get the sniff & wind tunnel tests!!❤
Thank you for all this content, I have been watching you over the past year and your content is awesome! I saw your review on the z50 and when I lost my A7III and I couldn’t afford to get another I decided to pull the trigger on the z50 instead based on your review. 🙏🏽
My face when I seen the price was equivalent to eating a lemon.
I’ve been waiting for this for ever !! Thank you !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Canon f4 lenses also have a red ring, so I understand Nikon for giving the 14-30 f4 an S. Btw that sniff and windtunnel test was very funny this time 😂
Because an f/4 premium lens is still a premium lens and might even be sharper in some cases than the f/2.8! As I was told by the salesmen at a local camera shop we used to have here near me, you'll pay more for the aperture than you'll pay for clarity.
Nikon makes the absolute best glass, hands down.
But they don’t make dream glass like the 28-70F2.
@@MrAyybee2cold they will make comparable glass soon. Plus the current lenses are fantastic. Most people don't have $3000 to throw at the 28-70 f2. Nor do most people need it
Absolutely! But why did they remove that beautiful golden ring? Sed.
I'm looking forward to this lens to complete my trinity. I just got the 70-200mm for the Z mount and it is so sharp. Love the pro glass FINALLY coming out for the Z line.
Jared, I have a question about using wide lenses while recording on the z6. It seems to be a problem with the edges popping in and out when you are trying to do like rotating movement around the subject ( 35mm and below ). I went to my local camera shop and they had no answers for me. Hoping to have your help on this matter. I even have raw footage I can share of the problem.
The 14-30 is a perfect lens for landscape, and it has more range. No real need for 2.8 unless you're doing astro.
Agree... plus the filters are much smaller and easier to handle. I use it with magnetic filters and it so powerful combination!
I could NOT stand the feel of the 14-30 in-hand when I played with one at a local camera shop. But, given that the dimensions of the new 14-24 are similar to the 24-70, I'm super eager to pick one up. I am currently running a Tamron 15-30 G2 on an FTZ for my super-wide and while it works phenomenally well, it's a god damn chunky bastard. Jared's quote in the beginning about balance and comfort is spot-on and shaving a pound off the lens will be awesome...
True. I have the PMVND 82 mm which fits the 14-30 and with step up rings it fits the rest of my collection.
@@tfransson I have a filter on my 14-30 as well. No special sizes needed. If money were no object, sure I'd want the 2.8 but I could just add a 20 1.8 for astro and still be around the same price.
@@zfreek98 I have the Tamron 15-30 also and very happy with its optics, and like the feel of it but both the S lenses are better away from the center. There is a very nice confidence-inspiring feel to the G2, better feel than the f/4 14-30 but for weight size, optical quality, vibration reduction, the S lenses get the nod. I like the G on my D850 but it seldom gets used nowadays after 2 years with the Z6 and loving it.
Great review! Love the enthusiasm.
Hi, I'm interested in the Sigma AF 70-200mm f/2.8 D EX APO HSM Zoom Lens for Nikon and I was wondering if anyone could tell me if the macro version can be used the same way as the normal one with the addition of shooting macro.
I appreciate any help.
What do you recommend.. the 14-24 f2.8 F mount OR the 14-30 f4 Z mount? they are both the same price if I buy the 14-24 f mount used
Is the Nikon Z series autofocus (tracking/face detection) better than a Canon EOS 800D or Olympus EM5 mkII?
If yes, I could be interested because I don't have (m)any issues focusing on those two.
Hey "Fro", just a heads up, I tried to use one of your affiliate links for the "wheeled bag" and it shows not available.
Wait, how are you editing DNG files in LR out of the Z6ii?
Am I missing something, or is there not a variable neutral density filter available in 112mm? I'm a video guy, and that's would make it more difficult for me to use the 2.8.
Thanks for the video 👍
How compares this Nikon z lense to the Canon RF and Sony GM lense?
Well, in the Canon World there is a L-Version with F4 and F2.8
I've been shooting with the 14-24 for a month now, - gave it a review on my channel last week. It's an awesome lens!
From everything I see here, I'm digging the 14-30mm f/4 S. And I have to agree on the natural bowing characteristics of the wide angle. When I picked my first ultra wide, an EF 20-35mm f/3.5-4.5 USM, I picked it in part because it had more of that natural effect. It also flares pretty heavily, but I dig it.
this lens looks amazing! i love nikon and fro! Great content with a few smiles and laughs along the way!
A rare video of Jared not shitting on Nikon. What a relief 😅
Hi Jared,
When Sigma 70-200 f2.8 for Sony e mount is coming ?
I'm getting ready to buy the nikon z6 II. I want to start making money and saving money on my listings by taking my own photos and video I also would like to practice my portrait photography at the same time. What lens would you suggest I get for both? I'm coming from a nikon d3400 that I've been practicing on for a year now by the way.
I was struggling between the 24-70 kit and f2.8 last year.
IQ > Weight > Price
After owing the f2.8, it doesn’t got much difference in IQ in centre but when u check the corner, omg, so much better.
I had no regret in buying a f2.8 with such expensive price at all.
I think the 14-24 also had the same story. I probably will check the IQ difference. If they are very similar, I might for the 14-30 + 20 1.8.
Finally the review I’ve been waiting for..I hope I won’t feel bad of buying the 14-30 few days ago after seeing this comparison 😅
You won't, you bought a fantastic lens. You have more range, a more compact glass and a more affordable filter size, missing only a stop of light. Plus you saved 1'300$
Is like to see if you could tell the difference at f 4 and greater between the two lenses
Honestly, I did want the 2.8 but settled on the 14 - 30 f/4. I mainly use for travel and am really happy saving money and weight.
I have the 14-24mm F/2.8 for Nikon dsrl. I’ll definitely be getting that one as well when I jump for mirrorless!
for any serious landscape shooters who’s planning to use this lens: NiSi has already released a 100mm filter holder system for this lens. Enjoy :)
Looks great for certain use cases, personally I’m really happy with the 14-30. This focal range is probably only 5% of my shooting so currently couldn’t justify the price of the 2.8. However I’m sure I would if money was no object.
Thanks for this great Video Jared
It's possible to achieve bokeh with the Nikon z50 kit lens (16-50mm)???
Whats up with Gpro colors from the Nikons?
thanks Jared .. good review
Canon has f4 L lenses, don't see why Nikon can't have f4 S lenses.
I think it's not a question of the aperture but the build quality. The 14-30 feels much cheaper, the tubus feels a little rickety... Didn't have that with any of my L-lenses in the Canon days.
@Code Bunny That's the point. All of my Z lenses are fine and feel well build. Ok, my brother in law had a little complaint with his first Z 24 f/1.8 and Nikon Germany changed it. My Z 20mm f/1.8 was fine out of the box. In fact even the much cheaper 50 1.8 prime feels less plastic (although it is) than the 14-30. That's why I waited for the 14-24. I think the 14-30 is worth around 600$ but not 1100 bucks.
@@stephanhenn1563 I think 14-24 is worth $1500 instead of $2400
@@stephanhenn1563 They're all well built, and fully weather sealed. That's an S or Canon L lens, they come fast and big, or slow and small, and you're free to choose.
The 14-30 is the only lens that has an 82mm filter thread at 14mm full frame. Not Canon, Not Sony, Not Panasonic, Not Fujifilm, Not Sigma, Not Tamron, Not any other cheap, smelly brand. Only at Nikon.
Thanks for the video. I thought you can't turn off lens correction on the Z files.
I like that Nikon is designating a lightweight lens as part of the high image quality line-up. It's frustrating for those of us looking for lightweight full frame lenses that give excellent image quality; the companies either make huge heavy options for pros, or they assume you're not a serious photographer and make the lightweight one lower quality.
How often would you shoot faster than f4 for landscapes? Maybe I'm wrong but he image quality doesn't appear worth $1500 more to me, and screw on filters are a fraction of the cost . The 14-30 is my go to lens for landscapes on my Z7, especially when lugging gear a few miles. I'm usually around f8 anyways, and if I'm looking for starbursts I'm upwards of f22. Most modern cameras and lenses are ALL great, it's who is behind them is what matters most.
Got the f/2.8, also a B+W 112mm CPL. Will need to go out to check it out. Thanks.
Do you think canon nifty fifty should be an L lens because it is 1.8?
You didn’t mention that it can hold gel filters internally.
Manny really likes the Z II's , even the eye autofocus is strong and competitive
I have the 14-30 and love the lens. It is really good. Great for travel.
I have Nikon F-mount 14-24 2.8. Should I sell it and buy Nikon Z-mount equivalent?
Hmm... could you use the function button to establish and permanently lock-in infinity focus for astrophotography? Now THAT would be awesome.
I have big hopes for the Z8/9, as long as I can get supersampled 4K60 full frame without overheating I'll be happy!
The 14-30 still looks amazing to be honest. I had hoped their 2.8 would have pushed the boat out a bit more and either done a 14-24 f2.2 or something like a 12-24 f/2.8.
On the F mount it's like how we had the 16-35 f4 which most landscape photogs preffered over the 14-24, but now the Z equiv is smaller lighter cheaper and sharper. It seems even less worthwhile to go with the 14-24 than before.
The Nikon 18-35 is way sharper than the Nikon 16-35 f:4 no comparison!
Deciding factor for me is the 'standard' 82mm filter thread on the 14-30. I shoot with a polarizer the majority of the time, so the size difference with filters is massive
I think the oled screen on the lens is the new gold ring!
Hey Jared, the Z 12-24 f/2.8 alredy is in my bag, although I'm not a pro and f/4 would be fine for me in most Situations.
So why didn't I choose the 14-30 f/4? Well, as you said, it's cheaper than the 12-24 but it also feels much cheaper in my hands. For me it feels like may be 600$. So i.m.o. it's not worth the 1100$.
Spilled my coffee at the wind tunnel sniffing test.
Any reason the comparison was just against the sony 12-24 in terms of build? Just thinking that canons 15-35 on RF may lose 1mm at the wide (and gain 11 at the long lets not forget) but gains the use of just an 82mm filter.
I don't have an ultrawide in my setup yet but love to shoot astro, so highly likely I'd wait longer and take this over the F4!
Does the F mean F mount?
I’m very new and trying to figure out which lenses fit Nikon, just impulse bought D60, D70, d3100, and now I need lenses.
You want the AF-S lenses. Do not buy any AF-P lenses since they will not work with any of your three cameras, which is a shame because they are very light, very sharp and inexpensive little lenses. They are a great value. They have a different focusing system than the AF-S lenses.
will this SERIOULSY be part of your travelling kit Jared???.....price is MY main friend right now bro....love the vids
great video Jared! I mean that. Thank you
Hi Jared - Just got it and I absolutely love the lens - I only need to buy the 24-70 and I'm all set. But I am quite content with the kit lens 24-70 f 4.0 very sharp and quick to focus. But what's life without the Hebrew trinity 😂
I think honestly these lenses are for different people. Both are great in terms of quality, but one has more range (30 Vs 24 is quite a difference), much smaller and lighter, but sacrifices aperture, while the other is the opposite. It's a pick and choose process, unlike how a lot of other 2.8 Vs 4 lenses which boils down to only about how much money you have in the pocket.
How the crap are you editing photos from the z6ii? I have a pile of NEFs that I can't do anything with, and it is making me sad.
Great review.
its was about time!!! I waited more than 100 review to see Jared to take a shower 😂 Min3.59' Legendary
Nice!! I have the old 14-24, love it, and am looking forward to getting this. I laughed too...Boeing...
Ayyyyy!!!!! Great vid!
Fuji has one lens with green ring on X mount. They have red plate on 8-15, 16-55, 50-140
are you going to do a z7ii review?
Hey Jared, request you to compare these 2 with Sigma 14-24 F2.8
Shootin Astro that OLED is a really nice to have
For most application, the 14-30 f4 will suffice unless you're shooting in extremely dim light. Both 14-30 and 14-24 are great lens. The 14-24 S is far superior than it's F mount counterpart. I know coz I tested both. The S variant cuts out all soft edges. It is sharp even at all corners
How often do you need that extra stop in a wide zoom?
and Does it make you want to spend an extra $1300 for it.
Comes in pretty handy when you are doing documentary stuff or photojournalism indoors in tight places
@@romanpul ... again, how often is That for the average photographer?
@@artsilva This is pro lens, designed for the needs of pros, like photojournalists. And if you are mainly doing this type of stuff you‘re gonna use it a lot. This lens is obviously not meant for average photographers.
With the modern ISO performances, it doesn't matter much
@@artsilva I mean he does say like 5 times get the f4 if you're amateur and get the f2.8 if you're a pro.
The display screen is probably a good signe to know that it's a high end lens. Maybe!!!
It’s crazy how photography has become a price comparison field, Look at me I have most expensive lens out there and still capture photos you could get with a basic 50mm 1.8 lol.
Right? When we think about it, most pictures we see in lens reviews could've been taken with a nifty-fifty or even a kit lens. I mean, only God would know what lens was used. 😁 In the end, people just care about the pictures, not what was used to make them.
@@ANSWERTHECALLOFJESUSCHRIST Nailed it.
What's the difference between the Hebrew trinity and the regular trinity? Lens hood ?
Ok, you're editing DNG files in Lightroom from the Z6ii - How? Adobe doesn't support the Z6ii NEF files yet so assuming you're using one of the publicly known hacks to convert. What's your process??? Inquiring minds want to know!!
I think the s is not about aperture, its about image quality, so even if its only f/4 it should be bringing extremely high level image quality
That’s what saying, F2.8 to F4 isn’t a huge difference to run home about that’s why you have a camera that can handle higher ISO’s. The price cap is the issue lol
@@techhead976 yeah I mean cameras compared to a decade ago can definitely handle an extra stop of iso which is gonna make up for the stop less of aperture, especially when you consider the camera is getting a better quality signal from the higher quality optics
@@detectivejonesw Exactly, What is the stop though? Like ISO 400 lol a D90 can handle that 😂
@@techhead976 depends on what genre of photography you're doing I'd say. For the kind of thing I do, late night street photography, I could make good use of iso 6400 maybe. On my current camera that's not viable (canon sl3) but I'm planning to get a Nikon z6 which seems to handle 6400 well and even higher. If I get an f/4 lens I might even push it up another 2 stops although that's getting to the limit
@@detectivejonesw I was talking outdoors but yeah for night you’ll need at least a D7200 if you’re talking lower end but great cameras.
The reason why 14-30 f/4 is S line because of its optics and high quality landscape images that comes out of it. As someone who has shot with this lens capturing landscapes, I can surely say its top of the line lens. Sure f/2.8 works great in certain scenarios but for landscapes its doesn't matter as long as the image coming out of it is amazing.
I'm glad Nikon is taking advantage of the flange distance and mount size to make the lenses much more compact than their DSLR counterparts.
I went with the 14-30 due mainly to the cost. I'm an amateur photographer so the need for me for the 2.8 just isn't really there. And I really can't fork out 2500 bucks for any lenses (except maybe the 70-200 if it ever comes out). I've had success with the 14-30 in my shooting so far, and will continue to use the f4 lenses until my skills can justify more "pro" glass. Love the videos Jared.
Same here. I just upgraded from the 24-70 f4 to the f2.8 and will also get the 70-200 soon, but as of now I‘m not considering to upgrade to the 14-24. I mainly shoot UWA at f5.6 and above and usually from a tripod so I don‘t see an advantage in for me personally. And considering that it’s only a f4 the 14-30 does a pretty good job at astro on the Z6
@@romanpul if you're doing astro on the z6 I've heard the 20mm prime is one of the better astro lenses and it's only a grand. Just throwing that out there, I feel like primes do a little better with astro in general
@@JayGreezy Sure the 20mm does a lot better at astro. Wouldn’t argue about that but the 14-30 does pretty good on that as well. If you’re only doing occasional astro I‘d say the 14-30 is probably the better option as it is generally more versatile but for a deeper dive into astro you’re better off with the 20mm
I had the 14-24 F Mount. I never shoot it below f8, used it for interior and I needed everything in focus. f2.8 makes only sense for astro.
Here we are!
I'm thinking about it.
If you don't like that "crop" the camera is doing shooting in 14mm you can easily turn it off in the camera settings. This is made in the "Photo Shooting Menu" and "Vignette Control"
I can’t wait to get some more funds to build on the z system
You wont regret it!I Love Nikon Z system
Still struggling to decide 14-30+20mm or 14-24mm, recommendation? Price is just similar
I think if nightscapes/milkway is a big consideration for you then I'd personally go with the 14-30mm/20mm combo.
Of course 14-24 2.8 otherwise you shoot milky way every day.
@@tyd7871 not clear to me since 20mm without star trails can‘t shoot as long as 14mm, the difference in aperture may just be compensated
I like that the 14-30 has a more usable walk around focal length. 24-30mm is a good street focal length.
The display is great for focusing at night for landscape
Jared, according to your comments, the f4 glass seems to be a "mediocre" glass. But would I benefit from the 2,8 glass on a Z6? Would I tell any difference?? (no need for hughe prints).
I have both. The f4 is by no means mediocre. I would describe them in comparison to the rest of what was available as Excellent and superb. In practice after post you won’t see much or any difference depending on the subject/conditions. Straight out of the camera the f2.8 files have a bit more contrast and colour. You won’t go wrong with either and the choice depends on your priorities/budget. F4 it’s light and you can use 100mm standard filters. F2.8 extra stop - better corner sharpness - files can look better in terms of pop straight from the camera but those differences can disappear when files are processed. I tend to use my f4 more because of convenience.
@@cas7155021 Charles, thanks a lot. Made my decision so much easier.
Why don't you do the same with the S 24-70mm f/4 and f/2.8? Please!
you're always passionate about your 2.8 glass ;)
Good news Jared for Sigma Z Mount lences coming soon 2021🙏.
I would love a 14-30 for E mount.
the 14-30 f4 plus 20mm f 1,8 might be much more practical in reality for the same price or even less
I love Hall & Oates! Nice story.
Has anyone compared the sigma 14-24mm f2.8 HSM art with the Nikon 14-24mm f2.8S yet?
To be honest, you'd have to try really really hard to see the difference in images taken with either the f2.8, or f4 lenses, making the f4 lens great value for money for many photographers, including pro's. I'd like to know if there is significant difference in construction, and internal build quality, to make the f2.8 lens more 'pro' for the money. It's that which could make the choice for a pro' user.
Dammit!!! I just bought the 14-24mm the other day!!! I didn't know the new one was out. Nonetheless I do love the 14-24mm, its still a solid lens
such a big quantum leap already with the z6ii+24.120 f4 in respect to my previous d5300 and... YES I do am going to buy the big bad one here 'cuz quality is already so bananas on the f4 I own that I now have to experience the magic with that one trinity.
I went for the 14-24, what a great lens.