@@elche1976 I knew this new gen was priced over the competition but damn this video really drives that home to rest. That tax from my calculations is around 5-6K more. Basically have to get into a mid trim off road or sport before it competes with these other trucks. And that will put it around 52K.
In my area when priced out all the options I got in the pro 4x with local 2024 Tacomas it was more like 9k + more. I wanted a Tacoma but am quite happy with the frontier
Frontier would be my choice. Best price if compared to the other off-road competition, engine and trans have 4 years of proven service reliability, best instrument cluster - analog and won't fail - and most comfortable seats.
The Nissan does not have a “JATCO designed and built trans”. It’s a Mercedes designed trans that then built by jatco. The same trans that is in the frontier is in the titan, meaning its going to be more reliable in the frontier because it’s only a V6 it’s hooked up too and it’s carry even less weight. The frontier is by far the best bang for you buck truck here, has just enough tech and a reliable drivetrain.
Correct on that. The Daimler Benz 9 speed has been out for many years. Its a proven design. The frontier is a heavy ass truck for a mid size. Maybe 1K lbs less then a titan at most. Its a tank.
@@thewireman134 That's allot of false perception. Frontier uses same F-alpha fully boxed frame as my 19 Pro 4X. I've never had a single problem. The 3.8 DI motor uses the same VQ technology. Nissan makes damn good motors. People regularly get 300K miles out of them.
@HiPlains1 not at all.. just saying very outdated tech, seen multiple 4wd issues and 4wd overheating and they were up until this model a lower cost option. No auto goes on and on.. Nissan isn't leading any market they are trying to keep their head above water and rely on their fanclub of yesteryear
@@HiPlains1right just have to watch out for front windshield not sealed properly, transmission issues (resolved by update I believe), paint issues, VCM issues, ABS issues, etc. At the end of the day, all new cars are too electronic and they are ALL having issues. Chevy has been having software issues in their Colorado’s, I’m sure the ranger will have 12 recalls by July, and the Toyota will probably have some engine issues with this new platform like the tundra did, but who knows. Bottom line, don’t pay over MSRP and get a good warranty!
@Brian_Eugene_Lee Believe me you don't want a diesel in mid size. Too many problems with the DEF emissions etc.. If we could get the mid sizes sold over seas that would be great without the DEF etc... Would love a hilux with the D4D or a Navara with the 2.3 twin turbo diesel. But it ain't going to happen. Probably your best bet would be a 1500 chevy truck with the 3.0 duramax. That one seems to be reliable running all that DEF crap. Dodge finally threw the towel in with their 3 liter diesel. Constant problems with emissions. You can still find 23's on the lots however. But I'd go with GM on that. The inline six is better then that crappy fiat diesel every day and twice on Sundays.
Yes it was really good he found all four at the same price points. Really makes Toyota look bad as far as value. It can't hold its own on this video. Not even close.
@Ben Hardy: If you use the truck as a truck, you have to choose between Colorado and Ranger. They have highest payload and most towing capability. 4WD Auto is nice in Chevy but no manual light switch, ouch. Ranger has nice interior, a little more leg room but the conservative styling hurts and the hard climate controls are too low to reach.
I bought the 24 nissan frontier pro 4x. I like the look of the nissan and the fact that it has the non turbo motor. I was tempted by all of the other trucks as far as comparison and pros and cons. I feel like youre splitting hairs with all the options. I was drawn to the nissan. Overall, I'm happy with the nissan, but I wish it got better real world fuel mileage. I saw some real world mpgs on all the other trucks and they do much better than the nissan. Other than that I feel good about my purchase of the nissan. Great vid! I subscribed!
None of these body on frames get good MPG's. The turbos suck down just as much if not more. When under boost they consume allot of fuel. OEMs hit a wall about 5 years ago with gas motors. About the only way around that problem is to use diesel. But the Feds have such tight emissions that's its really not worth going the route. In other markets Nissan sells the Navara truck with the twin turbo diesel can get over 30 mpg's on hwy. And that is with the 4X4 Pro 4X model. Which is a damn good looking truck IMO.
@@HiPlains1 I traded a ford f150 diesel for this truck. Mpgs were in the 30’s on the highway. It was 2wd. I really wanted a sportier truck and after all kinds of CZcams videos and hours of research… I decided on the Frontier. The f150 was practical for what it was but just not “fun” if you know what I mean. I really like this frontier. Sporty and nice looking. Overall I’m happy with the purchase. I knew I’d miss some attributes of the f150.
@@thetrailbuzzard 30 MPG's is really good. Must be an SV with street tires etc.. I know a Pro 4X ain't going to get anything close to that. Is that looking at the computer or did you manually calculate that? Really almost not believable. I've never heard anyone getting that unless maybe you driving 50 mph on a flat road with no wind. These body on frames have terrible aerodynamics and suck allot of gas at interstate speeds.
@@HiPlains1 I know it sounds crazy. If you look up ford f150 3.0 diesel you’ll see what I’m talking about. The truck I’m talking about was 2019 f150 3.0 v6 diesel. It was rated 22 city and 30 highway. I was able to hand calculate 37 and change all highway running posted speed limits. 55-70mph mixed. 130 miles or so total distance. Ford stopped making them and I didn’t want to be left with a truck that nobody knew anything about. Part of the reason for moving on to frontier. Plus I didn’t really need a half ton.
@@thetrailbuzzard Ok did not get it was a diesel. Diesel is the best application for heavy body on frame trucks and getting decent MPG's. I believe those numbers.
I think the most coolest looking truck is the Chevy the best looking front end too Does not look cheap Like the Nissan frontier Don't mind paying a little bit more For the best looking truck Chevy All the way👍
Everyone gnna have different opinion tbh but I bought a 24 Tacoma SR5 4x4 Long bed and I LOVE IT. The price was 44k but I am so happy with it. It’s amazing! 😁
Decided to go with a 24 Frontier 2wd SV for 37k. Blindspot monitoring, adaptive cruise, and a reliable v6 for that price sold me. I’ve been a Toyota guy for a while, but these new engines and ridiculous pricing have swayed me away. Love my new truck!
Depends what you’re looking for. I’m willing to trade off a little reliability and spend a little more for performance. I’m demanding of my vehicles and wouldn’t be happy with an underwhelming slug. I have a new company truck coming in next week, Canyon AT4. But if I were buying my own personal truck I’d go with the Colorado ZR2.
As the owner of a ‘22 Frontier SV I am partial to the Pro4X obviously, however I have owned a ‘21 Tacoma SR5 (paid $35K for it )as well and don’t miss it, I would upgrade the tires on the Tacoma first thing. The new Ford Ranger would interest me if I was in the market.
Ive been all Tacoma for the last three years, anticipating that I could finally afford to get one this fall. Now that Toyota has pussed out and went with the 4 cylinder, I will be getting a frontier. Ford Ranger and the Colorado has too many problems.
Because its nothing but hard plastics galore. And the fact they build them all at two plants in Mexico does not help. That SR5 looks like a cheap ass work truck (because it is). Unbelievable they want 46K grand for it. Worst value for money imaginable.
@@marcg.3830 Those rims and smallish street tires don't help. The rim may be an alloy but it looks like a cheapish wally mart hub cap. I mean its almost like they don't want buyers to get that.. Pushing sales to the other 50K plus trims no doubt. One thing is for sure, I've been put off on their newer MSRP's versus value since TFL broke their front transfer case on a tiny little icy grade. That was eye brow rising material lol. Still waiting on toyota's official statement on that. Nothing but crickets.
Ben, you have been Bringing It with the multi vehicle tests lately! Geez, damn good video. I am in the market for a midsize (or base trim 1/2 ton) to tow a small camper and haul camping gear with a shell/topper. I am not brand loyal; however, I have owned primarily Asian brands in my 40 years of buying vehicles (Mazda - 2, Datsun - 1, Toyota - 2, Honda - 3, Volvo - 1, Saab - 1, Ford - 1, Subaru - 1, and Kia - 2). As a teenager, I drove a Jeep J-10 pickup, an Olds Cutlass Supreme, and several of my dad’s land barges (Lincolns, Chryslers, and Cadillacs) For me, buying a truck, is about function. I need it to do something. I am a fan of all the trucks in this test along with the Gladiator and the Ridgeline. Lots of good choices in the midsize market. I want 4WD and/or AWD for light off-roading and some winter driving. I don’t need or want an off-road oriented truck, particularly since that drives down payload. For me, the Tacoma and the Frontier are great daily drivers that also serve as life style vehicles and/or off-roaders. However, they do not excel at the functions of hauling and towing relative to the Ranger and GM twins. Since my camper only weighs 2900 lbs, any tow capacity at or above 5,000 lbs will suffice for my needs. Payload is the critical variable. The Frontier/Tacoma at 1100/1200 lbs of payload are inferior compared to the Ranger/Colorado. Honda Ridgelines consistently have 1477 to 1586 lbs of payload. The Gladiator, GM twins, and Ranger can be optioned with 1500 to 1650 lbs of real world payload along with the ability to tow 7500 to 7700 lbs. I am underwhelmed with the Ranger’s exterior styling and pedestrian front end, but I am impressed with its function, interior, and value in this comparison. I prefer the styling of the Colorado (I like the Canyon even more) and I like that it offers Auto 4WD. I am not sure which truck I will end up buying at the end of 2024, but it will not be the Frontier or Tacoma since they lack the functionality of 1500 lbs of payload for my needs. Damn good lifestyle vehicles, but they don’t function enough as a truck in terms of hauling for me.
GMC Canyon looks best. I would go with Ranger but the front end styling is such a turnoff. Maybe I can go for a Ranger Raptor, now that is a good looking performance truck!
The Colorado and frontier gets you more bang for the buck . Ford is ok and the Tacoma gives you bare bones. At the end of the day they are still too expensive all this trucks should not be above 40k we are paying full size prices for midsize trucks.
The Ranger XLT with no start/stop button even as an available option unless you get the Lariat. Come on Ford. That said, I do like the Ranger and Frontier. I just wish the Frontier had more payload!
i own 2 tacomas humm they are great trucks but i do believe they are way overpriced the new tacoma not enough bang for the buck i would pick the chevy z71 trim and the ranger FX 4 Next, tough choice the new tacome looks stripped down for 50 grand after taxes and fees. thanks mr hardy.
Well for me the taco is a no go. I say chevy looks the best, but i would put my money on the frontier. I know its the least amount of claimed power, but I wouldn’t buy a midsize for power/performance. The less complex nissan engine i feel would have the longevity.
If one is towing every day then get a full size truck. But for everyday driving occasional local mountain outlander any one of them will do. For a long term reliability, it’s the frontier and possibly the best bang for the buck. In this next 2 month they will be moving them quick to make room for the 2025. So deals will be happening.
The Colorado looks the best. Aggressive and fast. The Nissan looks that smartest and nimble. The Ford looks like a Hertz rental truck. The Toyota looks like it’s gained some weight.
Just got a 2024 Ranger XLT FX4 with the 2.3L. I’d have liked the 2.7L V6 because more powah…duh…but I honestly don’t need it. Plus, my old 2021 Ranger with 2.3L was solid. Never missed a beat and feels plenty powerful enough. Going from 2021 to 2024 Ranger, there are a couple of things that I really wish Ford did for the ‘24 model: 1. Keep the gas hood struts that were in the 2019-23 model…why did they replace them with the old school strut??? Seems a backwards step to me 2. Add keyless entry and push button start to the XLT trim…overseas models get this in XLT, why doesn’t the USA? 3. Split-fold rear seats. This would be so handy to have! 4. Keep the lock-unlock buttons for all doors in the rear doors. My 2021 had them but my 24 doesn’t and I miss them. 5. Give us in the USA a diesel option. My dad just took delivery of a 2024 Everest with the 3.0L V6 diesel and I’m super envious. That would be an awesome engine to have in a “small” truck like the Ranger Overall, really happy with the changes to the styling of the new Ranger, but glad they kept the 2.3L/10spd drive train because I like it, personally.
Payload and towing is a bit misleading... those numbers are only for those specific trims and options, they can al vary a lot depending on many things. Ford and Chevy always seem to have higher numbers in similar configurations, and I think they figure it up a lot differently and aren't playing it as safe as Toyota or Nissan publishing numbers.
Colorado all day, every day. Without a doubt the best looking inside and out, plus outstanding powertrain. That out of the way, I really wouldn't turn any of these trucks down, they're all really nice. The Nissan is the most "old school" but also a bit ugly. The Tacoma is overpriced. But still, they're all very agreeable vehicles.
The Toyota is grossly overpriced. The toyota is basic with the SR5 trim level. Then for the same money you can have an XLT Ranger with FX4 package or a Frontier PRO 4X which I know comes with a rear locker. Even the Chevy comes with the Z71 package. This is a great video as it demonstrates how Toyota missed the mark on their price points. To anyone shopping around the segment it will become very obvious how bad a value the taco is. Toyota heads must really believe that buyers will pay a premium for the name. And ironically, Toyota is the loan maker that went south to Mexico for cheap labor. Whereas Chevy builds their truck at Wentzville Misouri. Ford at the Wayne plant in Michigan. And Nissan at the Canton Plant in Miss. Just on that alone, I would buy American. Really getting sick and tired of greedy corps sending jobs to other countries. And its just sad that toyota did that and raised their prices above all others. Pure greed. Excellent video Ben because your the first to really demonstrate this point to a tee. Tired of Toyota fanbois mouthing off how the taco is no more expensive then the others. Well, this video puts that argument to rest. You better believe it. Also appreciate Bens unbiased approach here. Just showing the features side by side. Not really picking favor here. To the viewer though I'm sure many will see how overpriced the toyota presents itself.
@@534N69 Nissan Frontier is super reliable I've found out, even if Nissan cars are more problematic. You cannot go by brand any more for reliability. Toyota has been doing horrible lately on several models, while others are still great. All brands are hit and miss... so its not as simple as 1 brand any more, or even 1 vehicle, it even depends on options.
@@534N69 the frontier is more reliable than all of them. They always have been people just don’t want to accept that. They can go 400,000 miles or more if you maintain them.
toyota cruising along on name and predicted reliability (which likely true). they doing the bare minimum to be competitive. However, ford using the manual key at $46k in 2024 is BS
The Toyota is too expensive when you add the package. The Ford omits the push button start at this price. That leaves the Colorado and Frontier. I could be swayed for either if the deal was aggressive enough.
Is the Toyota gunna be more reliable? Most likely! But dang they really overdid it with those tough to swallow prices. Toyota is always known for its value but with this new Tacoma they nickel and dime you for every feature.
Looking at cost up front, the Toyota is more. What is the cost long term. I will spend the money now and not later when prices of parts and labor have increased compared to today'sprices. The toyota will last a lot longer.
historically it *should* but its a completely new truck and they have been having problems with them already and major problems with the Tundra they redesigned a few years earlier. You really shouldn't trust them just because of the name... Toyota has been cutting corners.
It’s weird how the frontier looks like the tallest truck from the front but the shortest from the side. It’s a nice truck but I wouldn’t trust the transmission. The Colorado has the best dash and screens imo but I wouldn’t trust GMs electronics. The Ranger is very nice all around but I don’t like the portrait style screen and much prefer a horizontal one or a smaller one all together and no push button start for almost 50k? Toyota is definitely the loser here when it comes to value and cool factor in this price bracket tho. It would be a tough choice to be honest. All of them look pretty great.
Toyota offering only basic Sr5 trim here when compared to mid level and high trim like in the PRO 4X. If anything Ben's video really drives home how overpriced the taco is to the competition. I'm thinking 5/6K more which is allot. Its not remotely competitive.
I ordered a Ford Ranger. I do not buy into the import reliability hype like most sheep do. The worst and most unreliable vehicle I have ever owned was a Nissan. I have owned nothing but American brands since then and all of them have been very reliable. There is a video of a off road test between a new Colorado and Tacoma and guess which one broke a front axle? It wasn't the Colorado. IMO, the American trucks for the win with better looks, nicer interiors, and much better towing capacity and payload.
Toyota tundra and Honda ridgeline are more American than your ford , Chevy and dodge. They are build and assembled in the US by Americans for the American consumer. Engine, transmission and final assembly 100% build in America. And this trucks will outlast every f150, Silverado and ram yes you will get the rare ones that will last but they are not common. Just because you might of gotten the rare ford or Chevy that lasted does not mean they are reliable.
@@alfredorivera3454lol the NEW tundras are proving to be not very reliable I’ve seen to many horror stories already. And the ranger is built in America not all parts however.
Ford QC has been in the crappers with the bronco Explorer and F-150 on some models. And I mean serious issues with the 2.7 motor and the 3.0 as well. But the Ranger has been a good one for them. The 2.3 is a good motor. The Wayne plant puts out a good product. Just be happy you did not buy one of their crappy models that did not fair so well. There were plenty of therm. Even Jim Farley CEO admitted openly that their QC was in the shitters.
@@alfredorivera3454 Tacoma is made at two plants in Mexico. The new Tundra has already had issues. You must be thinking about the old 5.7 port injected V8. Yeah that was very reliable. But its no longer made. Toy is just using Fords eco tech on their turbo V6. And its already proven less effective then the trusty 5.7 Prices on used Tundras with the older drive train are going up for a reason.
Colorado looks the best in the front. The Tacoma is too bulgey. Nissan has these weird slits. Ranger is too bland. Colorado looks aggressive which is my taste. Although I do prefer simplicity the most (Ranger). I really don't like this transformer looking trucks these days. The Maverick got the front end right.
The Colorado & Canyon look the best on the outside. The Ranger & Tacoma have the best looking interiors. The Frontier will be the most reliable & the Ridgeline is not a truck!
Its the oldest unit here and yes I do. Lol the 4x4 system is also the worst of the bunch. I mean its 46k and good at nothing except assumed future reliability. Nissan has always been and will always be a low cost option to quality vehicles.. nothings changed here except they jacked their price up. @AngelAngel-ii1gm
You willing to pay the huge Toyota tax on that? I mean you got a bare SR5 with shitty street tires and rims, no rear locker, a tiny center stack, a cheap instrument cluster, a sea of hard plastics and a back seat that is unusable. Can't believe its even more cramped then the outgoing. The Ranger puts you in mid XLT trim with FX4 package, much nicer interior center stack/instrument cluster and class leading back seat etc.. Chevy also offer their mid level Z71 at the same price point. The frontier P4X probably the best deal here offering pretty much loaded trim. This is the one that is above the mid level trim and also offers Dana 44 rear locker. In short, the taco is grossly overpriced to the competition here. In fact, you would have to spent 5-6 thousand more to get into a decently optioned sport or offroad to even be competitive feature to feature. And its the only one made in Mexico with cheap Mexican labor. On that alone, I would not buy.
Go back and watch the race, stop holding on to hopes and dreams LOL. Colorado left 1.5 cars late and was within a bumper at the end. The way I see it it's a loss for the Ranger. It's apparent. The 2.7 is a truck engine the 2.3 isn't nearly as good especially when working.
@@thewireman134 This why you can't go by who won but instead go by 1/4 mile times. The ranger ran a 16.13 second @89mph and they did not show Andre's time in that video. However, in previous drag race videos they did and Andre's truck ran 16.88 @ 88mph ($8000 drag race video at 5min48sec). So regardless of who crossed the finish line first the times don't lie and the ranger was faster but overall pretty close. They both made it up the mountain at max load doing the speed limit. The 2.3 has been reported as being a reliable engine. That being said this is foreshadowing for when ford releases the 2.7 v6 in the ranger which should be a monster combo.
Just got a 2024 Ranger XLT FX4 with the 2.3L. I’d have liked the 2.7L V6 because more powah…duh…but I honestly don’t need it. Plus, my old 2021 Ranger with 2.3L was solid. Never missed a beat and feels plenty powerful enough. Going from 2021 to 2024 Ranger, there are a couple of things that I really wish Ford did for the ‘24 model: 1. Keep the gas hood struts that were in the 2019-23 model…why did they replace them with the old school strut??? Seems a backwards step to me 2. Add keyless entry and push button start to the XLT trim…overseas models get this in XLT, why doesn’t the USA? 3. Split-fold rear seats. This would be so handy to have! 4. Keep the lock-unlock buttons for all doors in the rear doors. My 2021 had them but my 24 doesn’t and I miss them. 5. Give us in the USA a diesel option. My dad just took delivery of a 2024 Everest with the 3.0L V6 diesel and I’m super envious. That would be an awesome engine to have in a “small” truck like the Ranger Overall, really happy with the changes to the styling of the new Ranger, but glad they kept the 2.3L/10spd drive train because I like it, personally.
You know I disagree. V6s are not a great design. You have more gaskets and spark plugs to fail, you have more weight, more piston rings. Plus where I live, having forced induction means you actually get the rated horsepower and not as low as 65% of it. Or me, the L3B is the obvious winner engine here. It has technology the other’s dont and is a really thought out design.
Ben ! Awesome comparo vid. Must have not been easy to get them all together unless all these dealers are within walking distance of each other. Or an assistant. My hats off to you for the hustle! :)
Exceptionally well timed video. All these trucks are really having their day so to speak. Im partial to the Colorado because i own one, but man what a time to be in the market!
The thing that stands out to me is how much less you get for your money with the Toyota.
Toyota tax.
@@elche1976 I knew this new gen was priced over the competition but damn this video really drives that home to rest. That tax from my calculations is around 5-6K more. Basically have to get into a mid trim off road or sport before it competes with these other trucks. And that will put it around 52K.
"But ReLiAbiLiTy"
- average Toyota stan
In my area when priced out all the options I got in the pro 4x with local 2024 Tacomas it was more like 9k + more. I wanted a Tacoma but am quite happy with the frontier
@dtay8913. Lol. That's me, but I'm not dumb. The Nissan IS what Toyota only claims to be now.
Frontier would be my choice. Best price if compared to the other off-road competition, engine and trans have 4 years of proven service reliability, best instrument cluster - analog and won't fail - and most comfortable seats.
Agree. Now I don’t have to say it.
The Nissan does not have a “JATCO designed and built trans”. It’s a Mercedes designed trans that then built by jatco. The same trans that is in the frontier is in the titan, meaning its going to be more reliable in the frontier because it’s only a V6 it’s hooked up too and it’s carry even less weight. The frontier is by far the best bang for you buck truck here, has just enough tech and a reliable drivetrain.
Correct on that. The Daimler Benz 9 speed has been out for many years. Its a proven design. The frontier is a heavy ass truck for a mid size. Maybe 1K lbs less then a titan at most. Its a tank.
Yeah that’s great and all but I hate that it’s direct injection only.
A major drawback at that. @@MrCamel2humps
Agreed. Mixed with that V6, it’s the Moses reliable/proven option.
the Frontier may sticker at 45-46k, but it can regularly be found and purchased at 38-41k. it’s by far the best value right now.
That's because people that have money don't want them. It's a subpar brand .. sorry
Yeah because it’s by far the least reliable right now
@@thewireman134 That's allot of false perception. Frontier uses same F-alpha fully boxed frame as my 19 Pro 4X. I've never had a single problem. The 3.8 DI motor uses the same VQ technology. Nissan makes damn good motors. People regularly get 300K miles out of them.
@HiPlains1 not at all.. just saying very outdated tech, seen multiple 4wd issues and 4wd overheating and they were up until this model a lower cost option. No auto goes on and on.. Nissan isn't leading any market they are trying to keep their head above water and rely on their fanclub of yesteryear
@@HiPlains1right just have to watch out for front windshield not sealed properly, transmission issues (resolved by update I believe), paint issues, VCM issues, ABS issues, etc. At the end of the day, all new cars are too electronic and they are ALL having issues. Chevy has been having software issues in their Colorado’s, I’m sure the ranger will have 12 recalls by July, and the Toyota will probably have some engine issues with this new platform like the tundra did, but who knows. Bottom line, don’t pay over MSRP and get a good warranty!
Thanks for the review! The Colorado looks the best!
@Brian_Eugene_Lee Believe me you don't want a diesel in mid size. Too many problems with the DEF emissions etc.. If we could get the mid sizes sold over seas that would be great without the DEF etc... Would love a hilux with the D4D or a Navara with the 2.3 twin turbo diesel. But it ain't going to happen. Probably your best bet would be a 1500 chevy truck with the 3.0 duramax. That one seems to be reliable running all that DEF crap. Dodge finally threw the towel in with their 3 liter diesel. Constant problems with emissions. You can still find 23's on the lots however. But I'd go with GM on that. The inline six is better then that crappy fiat diesel every day and twice on Sundays.
Then you’re passing on all midsize lol.
I'm not in the market now, but if I were I'd be getting the Frontier. Love the tried and true mentality they took with it.
Frontier everyday
Yes sir loving my pro 4x frontier
Me 2!!😅
That makes three of us. Love our 2023.
Now this is the video I was waiting for
I like how you compacted it to 17mins, perfect length imo
Yes it was really good he found all four at the same price points. Really makes Toyota look bad as far as value. It can't hold its own on this video. Not even close.
@Ben Hardy: If you use the truck as a truck, you have to choose between Colorado and Ranger. They have highest payload and most towing capability. 4WD Auto is nice in Chevy but no manual light switch, ouch. Ranger has nice interior, a little more leg room but the conservative styling hurts and the hard climate controls are too low to reach.
Could you explain the logic in that? There’s no diesel offered in the Ranger either.
I bought the 24 nissan frontier pro 4x. I like the look of the nissan and the fact that it has the non turbo motor. I was tempted by all of the other trucks as far as comparison and pros and cons. I feel like youre splitting hairs with all the options. I was drawn to the nissan. Overall, I'm happy with the nissan, but I wish it got better real world fuel mileage. I saw some real world mpgs on all the other trucks and they do much better than the nissan. Other than that I feel good about my purchase of the nissan. Great vid! I subscribed!
None of these body on frames get good MPG's. The turbos suck down just as much if not more. When under boost they consume allot of fuel. OEMs hit a wall about 5 years ago with gas motors. About the only way around that problem is to use diesel. But the Feds have such tight emissions that's its really not worth going the route. In other markets Nissan sells the Navara truck with the twin turbo diesel can get over 30 mpg's on hwy. And that is with the 4X4 Pro 4X model. Which is a damn good looking truck IMO.
@@HiPlains1 I traded a ford f150 diesel for this truck. Mpgs were in the 30’s on the highway. It was 2wd. I really wanted a sportier truck and after all kinds of CZcams videos and hours of research… I decided on the Frontier. The f150 was practical for what it was but just not “fun” if you know what I mean. I really like this frontier. Sporty and nice looking. Overall I’m happy with the purchase. I knew I’d miss some attributes of the f150.
@@thetrailbuzzard 30 MPG's is really good. Must be an SV with street tires etc.. I know a Pro 4X ain't going to get anything close to that. Is that looking at the computer or did you manually calculate that? Really almost not believable. I've never heard anyone getting that unless maybe you driving 50 mph on a flat road with no wind. These body on frames have terrible aerodynamics and suck allot of gas at interstate speeds.
@@HiPlains1 I know it sounds crazy. If you look up ford f150 3.0 diesel you’ll see what I’m talking about. The truck I’m talking about was 2019 f150 3.0 v6 diesel. It was rated 22 city and 30 highway. I was able to hand calculate 37 and change all highway running posted speed limits. 55-70mph mixed. 130 miles or so total distance. Ford stopped making them and I didn’t want to be left with a truck that nobody knew anything about. Part of the reason for moving on to frontier. Plus I didn’t really need a half ton.
@@thetrailbuzzard Ok did not get it was a diesel. Diesel is the best application for heavy body on frame trucks and getting decent MPG's. I believe those numbers.
I think the most coolest looking truck is the Chevy the best looking front end too Does not look cheap Like the Nissan frontier Don't mind paying a little bit more For the best looking truck Chevy All the way👍
Everyone gnna have different opinion tbh but I bought a 24 Tacoma SR5 4x4 Long bed and I LOVE IT. The price was 44k but I am so happy with it. It’s amazing! 😁
Ben what would you buy? Nice video thanks
Decided to go with a 24 Frontier 2wd SV for 37k. Blindspot monitoring, adaptive cruise, and a reliable v6 for that price sold me. I’ve been a Toyota guy for a while, but these new engines and ridiculous pricing have swayed me away. Love my new truck!
Depends what you’re looking for. I’m willing to trade off a little reliability and spend a little more for performance. I’m demanding of my vehicles and wouldn’t be happy with an underwhelming slug. I have a new company truck coming in next week, Canyon AT4. But if I were buying my own personal truck I’d go with the Colorado ZR2.
As the owner of a ‘22 Frontier SV I am partial to the Pro4X obviously, however I have owned a ‘21 Tacoma SR5 (paid $35K for it )as well and don’t miss it, I would upgrade the tires on the Tacoma first thing. The new Ford Ranger would interest me if I was in the market.
Pro4x. V6. No turbo. No hybrid. Hydraulic steering.
Ive been all Tacoma for the last three years, anticipating that I could finally afford to get one this fall. Now that Toyota has pussed out and went with the 4 cylinder, I will be getting a frontier. Ford Ranger and the Colorado has too many problems.
Toyotas new interiors just look so cheap.
Because its nothing but hard plastics galore. And the fact they build them all at two plants in Mexico does not help. That SR5 looks like a cheap ass work truck (because it is). Unbelievable they want 46K grand for it. Worst value for money imaginable.
@@HiPlains1 even by work truck standards this thing looks cheap.
@@marcg.3830 Those rims and smallish street tires don't help. The rim may be an alloy but it looks like a cheapish wally mart hub cap. I mean its almost like they don't want buyers to get that.. Pushing sales to the other 50K plus trims no doubt. One thing is for sure, I've been put off on their newer MSRP's versus value since TFL broke their front transfer case on a tiny little icy grade. That was eye brow rising material lol. Still waiting on toyota's official statement on that. Nothing but crickets.
Ben, you have been Bringing It with the multi vehicle tests lately! Geez, damn good video. I am in the market for a midsize (or base trim 1/2 ton) to tow a small camper and haul camping gear with a shell/topper. I am not brand loyal; however, I have owned primarily Asian brands in my 40 years of buying vehicles (Mazda - 2, Datsun - 1, Toyota - 2, Honda - 3, Volvo - 1, Saab - 1, Ford - 1, Subaru - 1, and Kia - 2). As a teenager, I drove a Jeep J-10 pickup, an Olds Cutlass Supreme, and several of my dad’s land barges (Lincolns, Chryslers, and Cadillacs) For me, buying a truck, is about function. I need it to do something. I am a fan of all the trucks in this test along with the Gladiator and the Ridgeline. Lots of good choices in the midsize market. I want 4WD and/or AWD for light off-roading and some winter driving. I don’t need or want an off-road oriented truck, particularly since that drives down payload. For me, the Tacoma and the Frontier are great daily drivers that also serve as life style vehicles and/or off-roaders. However, they do not excel at the functions of hauling and towing relative to the Ranger and GM twins. Since my camper only weighs 2900 lbs, any tow capacity at or above 5,000 lbs will suffice for my needs. Payload is the critical variable. The Frontier/Tacoma at 1100/1200 lbs of payload are inferior compared to the Ranger/Colorado. Honda Ridgelines consistently have 1477 to 1586 lbs of payload. The Gladiator, GM twins, and Ranger can be optioned with 1500 to 1650 lbs of real world payload along with the ability to tow 7500 to 7700 lbs. I am underwhelmed with the Ranger’s exterior styling and pedestrian front end, but I am impressed with its function, interior, and value in this comparison. I prefer the styling of the Colorado (I like the Canyon even more) and I like that it offers Auto 4WD. I am not sure which truck I will end up buying at the end of 2024, but it will not be the Frontier or Tacoma since they lack the functionality of 1500 lbs of payload for my needs. Damn good lifestyle vehicles, but they don’t function enough as a truck in terms of hauling for me.
Frontier already bought one
Me also, 2 weeks ago. Fkn love it!
@@snowsolo very underrated truck. i bought one last month. traded in a tacoma for it.
Same here on the 5th!!
Same here I got such a great deal a year ago on a loaded 23 Pro4x, it's been solid and fun to drive.
@maccooley3451 True very underrated people look at it like a cheap truck
GMC Canyon looks best. I would go with Ranger but the front end styling is such a turnoff.
Maybe I can go for a Ranger Raptor, now that is a good looking performance truck!
I got mine all black fx4
Will be putting an aftermarket grill for sure.
Colorado ZR2...all day, every day.
22 ZR2... back when they had v6
The ranger rocky ridge is also a nice looking truck
Maybe add for the comparison: ground clearance, bed sizes length and width (especially between wheel wells).
Great comparison video Ben! You’ve been killing it lately with reviews. Great job as always, thank you for the content!
The Colorado and frontier gets you more bang for the buck . Ford is ok and the Tacoma gives you bare bones. At the end of the day they are still too expensive all this trucks should not be above 40k we are paying full size prices for midsize trucks.
The Ranger XLT with no start/stop button even as an available option unless you get the Lariat. Come on Ford. That said, I do like the Ranger and Frontier. I just wish the Frontier had more payload!
It does, it's next to the drive mode button. It is kinda small though. (It's the button with the A with the arrow wrapping around it)
i own 2 tacomas humm they are great trucks but i do believe they are way overpriced the new tacoma not enough bang for the buck i would pick the chevy z71 trim and the ranger FX 4 Next, tough choice the new tacome looks stripped down for 50 grand after taxes and fees. thanks mr hardy.
Everyone has been switching to frontier, I just hope it doesn't get an annoying fanboy following.
Well for me the taco is a no go.
I say chevy looks the best, but i would put my money on the frontier. I know its the least amount of claimed power, but I wouldn’t buy a midsize for power/performance.
The less complex nissan engine i feel would have the longevity.
I'd take the Frontier hands down
If one is towing every day then get a full size truck.
But for everyday driving occasional local mountain outlander any one of them will do.
For a long term reliability, it’s the frontier and possibly the best bang for the buck.
In this next 2 month they will be moving them quick to make room for the 2025. So deals will be happening.
Just bought frontier pro4x premium package
I’d take any of them tbh,,,,but I like the engine in the Nissan, Because of the V6
The Colorado looks the best. Aggressive and fast.
The Nissan looks that smartest and nimble.
The Ford looks like a Hertz rental truck.
The Toyota looks like it’s gained some weight.
I like the Ranger and the Colorado.
Frontier
Just got a 2024 Ranger XLT FX4 with the 2.3L. I’d have liked the 2.7L V6 because more powah…duh…but I honestly don’t need it. Plus, my old 2021 Ranger with 2.3L was solid. Never missed a beat and feels plenty powerful enough. Going from 2021 to 2024 Ranger, there are a couple of things that I really wish Ford did for the ‘24 model:
1. Keep the gas hood struts that were in the 2019-23 model…why did they replace them with the old school strut??? Seems a backwards step to me
2. Add keyless entry and push button start to the XLT trim…overseas models get this in XLT, why doesn’t the USA?
3. Split-fold rear seats. This would be so handy to have!
4. Keep the lock-unlock buttons for all doors in the rear doors. My 2021 had them but my 24 doesn’t and I miss them.
5. Give us in the USA a diesel option. My dad just took delivery of a 2024 Everest with the 3.0L V6 diesel and I’m super envious. That would be an awesome engine to have in a “small” truck like the Ranger
Overall, really happy with the changes to the styling of the new Ranger, but glad they kept the 2.3L/10spd drive train because I like it, personally.
Compared to the other trucks interior, the Tacoma looks really cheap.
Dang, I wish that Colorado still had the longer bed.
Payload and towing is a bit misleading... those numbers are only for those specific trims and options, they can al vary a lot depending on many things. Ford and Chevy always seem to have higher numbers in similar configurations, and I think they figure it up a lot differently and aren't playing it as safe as Toyota or Nissan publishing numbers.
I've been drooling over the new Frontiers. When the time comes, that is my choice.
Colorado all day, every day. Without a doubt the best looking inside and out, plus outstanding powertrain. That out of the way, I really wouldn't turn any of these trucks down, they're all really nice. The Nissan is the most "old school" but also a bit ugly. The Tacoma is overpriced. But still, they're all very agreeable vehicles.
The Toyota is grossly overpriced. The toyota is basic with the SR5 trim level. Then for the same money you can have an XLT Ranger with FX4 package or a Frontier PRO 4X which I know comes with a rear locker. Even the Chevy comes with the Z71 package. This is a great video as it demonstrates how Toyota missed the mark on their price points. To anyone shopping around the segment it will become very obvious how bad a value the taco is. Toyota heads must really believe that buyers will pay a premium for the name. And ironically, Toyota is the loan maker that went south to Mexico for cheap labor. Whereas Chevy builds their truck at Wentzville Misouri. Ford at the Wayne plant in Michigan. And Nissan at the Canton Plant in Miss. Just on that alone, I would buy American. Really getting sick and tired of greedy corps sending jobs to other countries. And its just sad that toyota did that and raised their prices above all others. Pure greed. Excellent video Ben because your the first to really demonstrate this point to a tee. Tired of Toyota fanbois mouthing off how the taco is no more expensive then the others. Well, this video puts that argument to rest. You better believe it. Also appreciate Bens unbiased approach here. Just showing the features side by side. Not really picking favor here. To the viewer though I'm sure many will see how overpriced the toyota presents itself.
Which one has the best sound system?
Nissan all the way with the NA V6.... those turbos will cause you problems in the future
Yup NA engines have fewer complex parts that make it really reliable than turbo engines
Frontier..all day
Comes down to reliability..
I Love My Frontier SV for the value thousands less than the sparsely equipped over priced Toyota.
Love the ranger its the best all around!
Ben you always deliver! Been waiting for this review
If the frontier had at least 1400 pounds of payload it wouldn’t even be a competition
If I had to choose it would be the Chevy
Colorado would be PERFECT if it had a column shifter and not a mechanical stick that you have to shift from Canada to Brazil to put into drive
Only boomers want column shifters
And if they got rid of that piano black plastic
Nissan all day . I would never consider any other .
Oh okay so you hate reliability 😂
🤣
@@534N69 troll acccount I see 🤣
@@534N69 Nissan Frontier is super reliable I've found out, even if Nissan cars are more problematic. You cannot go by brand any more for reliability. Toyota has been doing horrible lately on several models, while others are still great. All brands are hit and miss... so its not as simple as 1 brand any more, or even 1 vehicle, it even depends on options.
@@534N69 the frontier is more reliable than all of them. They always have been people just don’t want to accept that. They can go 400,000 miles or more if you maintain them.
No gmc canyon!
But fir the lrices if these trucks idk might as well get a fullsize. I never really did understand the 1/4 tons market.
The GMC Canyon is a really nice truck powertrain wise the same as the Colorado, but the interior is nicer
Why do you have to slam the Nissan hood
toyota cruising along on name and predicted reliability (which likely true). they doing the bare minimum to be competitive. However, ford using the manual key at $46k in 2024 is BS
Power sliding rear window on the Tacoma and Ford. Nice,,,,😂….either make it power or leave it out….GM and Nissan
The Toyota is too expensive when you add the package. The Ford omits the push button start at this price. That leaves the Colorado and Frontier. I could be swayed for either if the deal was aggressive enough.
Great video
Then the Kia Tasman just walked in….. Boom 💥
Is the Toyota gunna be more reliable? Most likely! But dang they really overdid it with those tough to swallow prices. Toyota is always known for its value but with this new Tacoma they nickel and dime you for every feature.
The Tacoma is not that reliable and if this new one is anything like the new tundra it will not be that reliable either
Looking at cost up front, the Toyota is more. What is the cost long term. I will spend the money now and not later when prices of parts and labor have increased compared to today'sprices. The toyota will last a lot longer.
historically it *should* but its a completely new truck and they have been having problems with them already and major problems with the Tundra they redesigned a few years earlier. You really shouldn't trust them just because of the name... Toyota has been cutting corners.
RANGER ALL DAY!!
It’s weird how the frontier looks like the tallest truck from the front but the shortest from the side. It’s a nice truck but I wouldn’t trust the transmission. The Colorado has the best dash and screens imo but I wouldn’t trust GMs electronics. The Ranger is very nice all around but I don’t like the portrait style screen and much prefer a horizontal one or a smaller one all together and no push button start for almost 50k? Toyota is definitely the loser here when it comes to value and cool factor in this price bracket tho. It would be a tough choice to be honest. All of them look pretty great.
Toyota offering only basic Sr5 trim here when compared to mid level and high trim like in the PRO 4X. If anything Ben's video really drives home how overpriced the taco is to the competition. I'm thinking 5/6K more which is allot. Its not remotely competitive.
@@HiPlains1 yeah like I said no value there. Toyota has really gotten greedy since 2020. Big time.
@@Jay-bw3fl Yeah that SR5 looks like a freaking work truck next to the rest. Its comical looking. Especially with that huge ass air dam.
Tacoma❤️🔥
I ordered a Ford Ranger. I do not buy into the import reliability hype like most sheep do. The worst and most unreliable vehicle I have ever owned was a Nissan. I have owned nothing but American brands since then and all of them have been very reliable. There is a video of a off road test between a new Colorado and Tacoma and guess which one broke a front axle? It wasn't the Colorado. IMO, the American trucks for the win with better looks, nicer interiors, and much better towing capacity and payload.
The Ranger has earned top reliability scores the last few years.
Toyota tundra and Honda ridgeline are more American than your ford , Chevy and dodge. They are build and assembled in the US by Americans for the American consumer. Engine, transmission and final assembly 100% build in America. And this trucks will outlast every f150, Silverado and ram yes you will get the rare ones that will last but they are not common. Just because you might of gotten the rare ford or Chevy that lasted does not mean they are reliable.
@@alfredorivera3454lol the NEW tundras are proving to be not very reliable I’ve seen to many horror stories already. And the ranger is built in America not all parts however.
Ford QC has been in the crappers with the bronco Explorer and F-150 on some models. And I mean serious issues with the 2.7 motor and the 3.0 as well. But the Ranger has been a good one for them. The 2.3 is a good motor. The Wayne plant puts out a good product. Just be happy you did not buy one of their crappy models that did not fair so well. There were plenty of therm. Even Jim Farley CEO admitted openly that their QC was in the shitters.
@@alfredorivera3454 Tacoma is made at two plants in Mexico. The new Tundra has already had issues. You must be thinking about the old 5.7 port injected V8. Yeah that was very reliable. But its no longer made. Toy is just using Fords eco tech on their turbo V6. And its already proven less effective then the trusty 5.7 Prices on used Tundras with the older drive train are going up for a reason.
Colorado looks the best in the front. The Tacoma is too bulgey. Nissan has these weird slits. Ranger is too bland. Colorado looks aggressive which is my taste. Although I do prefer simplicity the most (Ranger). I really don't like this transformer looking trucks these days. The Maverick got the front end right.
Like the Tacoma color but that trim needs to be higher for comparison super boring model.
That screen in the Ford is clownish. Just go ahead and mount a 55” to the dash.
Gladiator 😅
That doesn't count
It's roughly about $10-20k more than these trucks
Went Ranger Raptor and ain’t lookin back
The Colorado & Canyon look the best on the outside. The Ranger & Tacoma have the best looking interiors. The Frontier will be the most reliable & the Ridgeline is not a truck!
What's a Frontier? Lol
But seriously, if you like wind noise, low tech, horrible mileage, and faulty 4x4 systems the Frontier is for you. Ya got a v6 though 😮
@@thewireman134Do you know something about cars and about this new Frontier?
Its the oldest unit here and yes I do. Lol the 4x4 system is also the worst of the bunch. I mean its 46k and good at nothing except assumed future reliability. Nissan has always been and will always be a low cost option to quality vehicles.. nothings changed here except they jacked their price up. @AngelAngel-ii1gm
Frontier has proven to certainly not be the most reliable
Don’t get fooled by a V6, it’s still a Nissan
That airdam on the Toyota is SO bad .
Taco all day for me🌮❤
You willing to pay the huge Toyota tax on that? I mean you got a bare SR5 with shitty street tires and rims, no rear locker, a tiny center stack, a cheap instrument cluster, a sea of hard plastics and a back seat that is unusable. Can't believe its even more cramped then the outgoing. The Ranger puts you in mid XLT trim with FX4 package, much nicer interior center stack/instrument cluster and class leading back seat etc.. Chevy also offer their mid level Z71 at the same price point. The frontier P4X probably the best deal here offering pretty much loaded trim. This is the one that is above the mid level trim and also offers Dana 44 rear locker. In short, the taco is grossly overpriced to the competition here. In fact, you would have to spent 5-6 thousand more to get into a decently optioned sport or offroad to even be competitive feature to feature. And its the only one made in Mexico with cheap Mexican labor. On that alone, I would not buy.
High trims for the competition and an entry level for the Tacoma ? It’s not a fair comparison
Yet Tacoma was the most expensive. Meaning they charge more for a lot less. Higher trims where they equal performance... go up 10k
Spotted the Toyota fan boy lol
@@BMoneyTatzyou look like a ford fan boy
No Turbo for me ,
Thank you
Tundra is a better buy than the Tacoma $10K more and you can get the new hybrid with 438hp and 500+Pound feet of torque 🤯
Ranger and Nissan are so ugly tho
Nissan is the second best looking IMO.
The Taco look sooo ugly and got a chin of Jay Leno!
Lol the Toyota blob is a masterpiece that means in your terms 🤣 shit so ugly
Gm wins imo ranger would have but they have no sunroof
That Taco engine overheat with 35'" tires. That newbie cannot be trusted!
Ford Ranger smoked them all in 0 to 60..Ranger all day!!👍👍👍💪💪💪
Go back and watch the race, stop holding on to hopes and dreams LOL. Colorado left 1.5 cars late and was within a bumper at the end. The way I see it it's a loss for the Ranger. It's apparent. The 2.7 is a truck engine the 2.3 isn't nearly as good especially when working.
You continue to fly your ford flag though. Lol
@@thewireman134Stop the excuses! A win is a win! There's no crying in racing!
@@thewireman134 This why you can't go by who won but instead go by 1/4 mile times. The ranger ran a 16.13 second @89mph and they did not show Andre's time in that video. However, in previous drag race videos they did and Andre's truck ran 16.88 @ 88mph ($8000 drag race video at 5min48sec). So regardless of who crossed the finish line first the times don't lie and the ranger was faster but overall pretty close. They both made it up the mountain at max load doing the speed limit. The 2.3 has been reported as being a reliable engine. That being said this is foreshadowing for when ford releases the 2.7 v6 in the ranger which should be a monster combo.
@thewireman134 You're stupid. It doesn't matter if the Colorado has a more powerful engine if that transmission can't shift properly.
Frontier
Just got a 2024 Ranger XLT FX4 with the 2.3L. I’d have liked the 2.7L V6 because more powah…duh…but I honestly don’t need it. Plus, my old 2021 Ranger with 2.3L was solid. Never missed a beat and feels plenty powerful enough. Going from 2021 to 2024 Ranger, there are a couple of things that I really wish Ford did for the ‘24 model:
1. Keep the gas hood struts that were in the 2019-23 model…why did they replace them with the old school strut??? Seems a backwards step to me
2. Add keyless entry and push button start to the XLT trim…overseas models get this in XLT, why doesn’t the USA?
3. Split-fold rear seats. This would be so handy to have!
4. Keep the lock-unlock buttons for all doors in the rear doors. My 2021 had them but my 24 doesn’t and I miss them.
5. Give us in the USA a diesel option. My dad just took delivery of a 2024 Everest with the 3.0L V6 diesel and I’m super envious. That would be an awesome engine to have in a “small” truck like the Ranger
Overall, really happy with the changes to the styling of the new Ranger, but glad they kept the 2.3L/10spd drive train because I like it, personally.
Which one has the best sound system?
The frontier sales are going to sky rocket with the Toyota going to a 4 turbo. Frontier is by far the best choice
You know I disagree. V6s are not a great design. You have more gaskets and spark plugs to fail, you have more weight, more piston rings. Plus where I live, having forced induction means you actually get the rated horsepower and not as low as 65% of it. Or me, the L3B is the obvious winner engine here. It has technology the other’s dont and is a really thought out design.
Frontier
Toyota is robbing people.
Ben ! Awesome comparo vid. Must have not been easy to get them all together unless all these dealers are within walking distance of each other. Or an assistant. My hats off to you for the hustle! :)
Exceptionally well timed video. All these trucks are really having their day so to speak. Im partial to the Colorado because i own one, but man what a time to be in the market!
Loving my Colorado trailboss. These videos were a big reason for my purchase.
Ranger wins based on power rear window and rear leg room for me. Insane at these prices to have a stupid manual rear window.