First Man (2018) - scene comparisons
Vložit
- čas přidán 17. 12. 2018
- Comparisons between scenes from the movie First Man (2018)
with the real life events from the life of Neil Armstrong.
Famous People Portrayal in Movies Playlist
• Playlist
Scenes Comparisons Playlist
• Scene Comparisons
Movies & TV Crossover Playlist
• Playlist
Every Time that Someone Played a Character Playlist
• Playlist - Krátké a kreslené filmy
Like many have already pointed out, there are some mistakes on the video.
I'm not a specialist, I just searched on the youtube and sadly I didn't notice the mistakes. The info on the title of the videos were wrong, so I got wrong too.
Sorry! :(
ALSO, I WILL FUCKING BAN ANY MORON WHO SAYS THAT MOON LANDING IS FAKE!
I fully agree with you concerning the ban idiotic Moon hoaxers (because there were COUNTLESS people working VERY hard on the Apollo program and some people (like Apollo 1 crew) DIED for that). Greetings from the Czech Republic.
No worries its interesting n shows terrible casting for aldrin
Have you actually had to ban anyone yet?
@@masterimbecile yes, about 20 or 25
Dont worry bud it is still a great video
I have seen this movie in theatre. After it was over and I got out and into my car I just sat there and think, my hand on the keys in ignition. I just couldn't get off my mind thoughs about how small and insignificant I am, how little I've seen in my life and about all those things that I'll never be able to look at. Despite the fact that I just love aviation and space exploration it was worth to watch it and get little more humble.
Same feeling brother
Hey man you're not insignificant just because you haven't or may never achieve anything as great as Neil Armstrong has. Everyone has their own journey.
This is about scene comparisons , follow the theme would ya . The actors didnt look right for the people they were portraying , the similarities were vague in comparison , and if you lived in those times and saw them first hand as i did ..youd say .. Ryan Gosling has a bad habit of looking down to his script , like George Clooney to think of his next line to say. He looks sheepish unlike the Real Neal Armstrong . And to use a part of the 2001 soundtrack in the film was unsacred and plagiaristic .
The Background score for this movie deserves an award
My God, how I loved this movie.
WHY WAS THIS NOT NOMINATED FOR BEST PICTURE!?!?!??!??!
No blacks.
Lmao true that
Justice was served, though. It won for Special Effects (over Black Panther, Avengers, and Solo).
The only misconception here that is distracting is that in the movie everything is shaky. Any time a motor fires or something spins there’s a rocky earthquake going on. In actuality there was only the rumble upon the first minute of liftoff then the crew would report smooth.
Also the roll rate of Gemini reached only 1 r/s, but the movie portrays about 3. And it wasn’t immediate. That would be hard to walk away from.
Other than this the movie has fantastic accuracy.
You might wanna check your launch footage for Gemini 8, that was actually footage of an Atlas-Agena launch, not a Titan-Gemini launch.
Amen! The troublesome Agena booster. For once, on Gemini 8 it wasn't the Agena causing the problems but the stuck thruster on the Gemini capsule. We are so damn lucky that we didn't leave any dead astronauts in space.
kevoblivion Exactly. The hats with the propellors are a dead giveaway. Apollo 12 with Pete Conrad as CDR
They used available launch footage for some of the movie. Not accurate, but heck, it was close enough.
Yeah, I noticed that.... Lol
yeah, i was like, why does it look like a penis and not Titan II
The side-by-side videos from inside the capsule and outside feel nicely complementary. Great care was given to recreate the moonlanding as exact as possible. Great video!
One small step for man, one giant leap for mankind. To hear that still chokes me up. I was 9 year old boy with visions of being an Astronaut when this happened and still remember watching this on TV.
k re Me too 😊
7:46 you have some nice Apollo 12 footage mixed in too. Good to see Alan Bean shaving and Pete Conrad with his cap, but don't mistake that as Apollo 11.
I wanna see this movie again on a big screen 😩
Sabar bambang
People raised a fuss that they didn't have a scene in the movie of planting the American flag, but nobody said anything about an American hero being played by a Canadian actor. Funny
Aaron I cause the only thing expected from An actor is to be good. If you are a good actor you get the role. Planting your country’s flag on the fucking moon is a really important moment. I bet if another country was the first and they made this movie they would have had the flag planting scene.
Best moment when he drop little crystal ring in to the moon hole and flight ignition part
I mean, the pre-launch stuff is total fiction in the movie. I was surprised the movie did not replay the section where the BBC journalist asks about getting stranded on the lunar surface, as this would have fit neatly into the narrative at that point. The real Armstrong's obvious annoyance at this question, yet also being quite revealing about the risks they were facing, is fascinating to watch.
7:38 - Apollo 12, not 11. That's Conrad (front) and Bean (back, shaving). Cheers.
They nailed it. This really fulfils the essence of Neil.
Not seen this film yet... looking forward to it though... it’ll probably be on the ‘Now’ box soon..... I remember the real thing like it was yesterday, being woken and taken out of bed by my parents to watch, as the world held its breath, a Man take a giant leap for Man Kind ,....I was only 9 😂... I remember the country being swept away by Moonmainia... even The Beatles couldn’t compete.... marvellous days, wonderful memories....I feel privileged to have been around at the same time.
Great video! How did you get the scenes from the movies?
Error in the real footage you've used: the launcher of the Gemini capsule was the Titan II, not the Atlas-Agena. The Atlas-Agena was used for the target vehicle (unmanned).
It never gets any less awesome.
A super film and great music!
The Gemini 8 scene liftoff was chilling as hell. It captured what it felt like being in there.
Gemini 8 launch footage is wrong. That's the agena launch vehicle, Gemini 8 was not on it. Gemini spacecraft launched via a Titan 2 booster, not an Atlas. It'd be impossible to miss because the capsule is just sitting on top of it, with no protective cover or launch escape tower. Just a capsule on top of an ICBM.
The crew would eject out of the hatch in the Gemini capsule
In the movie the space craft looked like they had just been delivered from the junk yard with dirt,rust and squeaking doors not what I remember watching as a kid and later on family visits to Huntsville and the Kennedy space Centre they still look like new and not like the scrap in the movie.
I hope to see a Bohemian rhapsody comparison when the footage is (legally) available
I will do ;)
@@dimitreze thanks ;)
dimitreze after you do bohemian rhapsody comparison could you please do a comparison of the new edition story
There are a few comparisons with the LiveAid concert footages, and they are absolutely glorious!
The footage you used for the Gemini 8 launch was from an Atlas launch, not Titan.
The "Gemini 8" launch film from '66 is actually of the Agena target docking vehicle, not the Gemini Titan vehicle that carried Armstrong and Scott.
8:45 Contact light...
OK, engine stop.
The Eagle has landed.
Who else thinks that at 1:38, the movie should've included the actual telecasted narration into this scene? I think it works extremely well.
Hey Dimitreze can you do odd squad Olympia's day and otis's day scene comparison?
The only thing I didn’t like about the film was the overuse of shaky-cam.
11:06 That's one small step for [a] man, one... giant leap for mankind.
lol It doesn't make sense to use 'man' in plural twice, does it?
using the word "man" as plural usually means "humanity", but if he said "Men" then he's talking about men only, no women involved.
English isn't my primary language so I don't know about how accurate this is, but that's how I see it.
barry nicholas oh please tell us all again how we never landed on the moon “cuz the Van-Allen Belt”!
barry nicholas That’s usually the argument.
barry nicholas Ok, then what is your argument against the moon landing? Most arguments I have read and seen talk about how humans can’t survive going through the Van Allen Belt, which is a layer of radiation between the earth and the moon. I’m actually surprised you’ve never heard of it, as a moon landing denier. I think my last two statements were pretty clear.
Goosebumps!
Did the actors say the lines perfectly as they were recorded or did they simply use the original recordings?
they did both.
It looks like the cameraman was having a seizure.
Yeah, it's extremely distracting and, I think, takes away from the authenticity of the film.
They didn't have the technology to make this movie so they faked it by really going to the moon.
The audio difference in my headphones bothers me for some weird reason
Do Apollo 11 1969 event and Transformers: Dark at the Moon
The best movie of the year . It should have been indicated as the best movie.
Matching on 3 axis, speed and location is very difficult!
What a disservice they did to Aldrin in this. The smartest of all of them, reduced to some buffoon.
That's DOCTOR ! Aldrin Aka Dr. Rendevous
oops Dr. Rendezvous
@@nickyl9040 , right. Exactly my point.
I didn't think they made him look like a bafoon at all. He was portrayed as extremely competent during the Moon landing. He did (and does) have a pretty abrasive personality, so if that's what you're talking about, then yes, they got it pretty accurate.
@@joshuaomer9644 , well, that's your opinion. I disagree. I thought he was portrayed as oafish and obnoxious. Neither Gosling, nor Stall, bore any resemblance to the characters they portrayed. Overall, I enjoyed the film. It was high time the story came together on the big screen. But there were major missteps. "Apollo 13" is the superior film.
7:44 is Pete Conrad and his crew on board of apollo 12
Nice try, but you lost me at Atlas-Agena. Please correct that and I will be happy to share your video.
ok the launch vehicle for the gemini sequence is the agent target vehicle and not a titan II gemini rocket
Do a crossover between two steven universe episodes:
The Answer (2016)
Now We're Only Falling Apart (2018)
Obviously I dont know much about Neil's personal life, and overall I think the movie First Man was really good, but I think they tried waaay too hard to make him this overly complex, emotional person. He always seems so serious and unenthusiastic about his space missions in the movie. For much of the movie they portray him as sort of disconnected with his wife and kids and not really focused on them.... then when he finally gets to the moon it just shows him thinking about his family. Which to me doesnt seem realistic. And they spend 80% of the movie showing how he feels about everything and so little on the actual details of the missions. I would have rather it been a movie more about the journey and process of landing on the moon than about Neil's emotions. After watching interviews with the real Neil Armstrong I am not convinced he was this deep, introverted, emotional person they portray him to be. Quite the opposite if anything. He seems very positive, enthusiastic, very uplifting and very matter-of-fact.
I mean, that was basically the point of the movie. It wasn't about the missions, it was about Neil. It's a biopic.
He was artistic
The title of the film is 'First Man' - it's about the person not the entire team - the title speaks to that. There are many docs about the Apollo missions and the amazing ground teams - this is not that, I've come to discover.
Well Neil's kids actually liked the movie and liked very much how they portrayed him. They though they did it right, well except the fun dude of him. Overall, he was a serious and reserved man, but also with a fun side that they didn't show in the movie. That's what I know from what I've seen, but I actually want to read the biography that the movie is based of (also called First Man). And I think the movie is well done as Neil only did Gemini 8 and Apollo 11, so what do you mean on that they should focus on the missions if he only did 2? And I think they showed enough of them. And it's a biography-ish of Neil Armstrong, not a movie about his missions, so I think showing the same amount or even more about his life and emotions than the missions is essential.
David I think all they meant by that was trying to show how much more quiet and humble he was, especially compared to the others. What I would like to know, if anyone can tell me, is if Aldrin really was always running his mouth and opinions at everything like in the movie. I doubt he could have been that up himself?
came on this vid for all the " that top video is deffo fake" comments
Классный фильм!
Great movie
If you aren't proud to be an American after seeing this movie then you don't have a pulse.
So did Neil really look out of the walkway window on his way to Gemini 8 and see the Agena launching as per the movie?
10:04 incredible 👍
Next do bohemian Rhapsody scene comparisons
Why does the surface of the moon in the movie look more realistic than the actual surface
Mabye because in the movie they use a modern hollywood camera compared to the crappy 1969 tech used in the real event. Just say it like it is kid, you are a braindead flattard and are trying to find excuses to believe your "space desn't exist" theory.
first scene was atlas-agena lift off, not Gemini 8 lift off
THIS IS AGENA IN ATLAS ROCKET, NOT TITAN LAUNCH
Create a crossover scenes about Apollo 11 between “First Man” (2018), “Men In Black 3” (2012) and “Transformers: Dark of the Moon” (2011) 😊😉😎 Thank You!
Not really correct. The S5 launch used real footage in the movie. Just different cameras than presented here.
the biggest difference is the filth on the switches and knobs
Agreed
Until the Space Shuttle came along all of the capsules that the astronauts flew were brand spanking new and had never been flown before ...or after
最初のリフトオフの場面、下部の実写の打ち上げはアトラスのアジェナ衛星。タイタンllのジェミニ8でないよー。
Nice back
Bohemian Rhapsody comparasions please 😉😉😉😊
5:41 Ok this part was weird
Do you really think Armstrong and Scott launched in an Atlas-Agena?
Make Crossover between First Man (2018) and Transformers: The Dark of the Moon (2011). Thanks You! 😉😉😉
Make a crossover scenes about 9/11 attacks between “United 93” (2006), “World Trade Center” (2006), “W.” (2008), “Dear John” (2010), “Jack Ryan: Shadow Recruit” (2014), “9/11” (2017) and “Vice” (2018). Thank You! ☺☺☺😉😉😉
Landing sequence was pretty innaccurate at times which is unfortunate, buty good movie.
Neil & Buzz, the first men on the moon. I prefer to say it that way.
Buzz Aldrin, first second man on moon .. or was is second first? :)
I'm absolutely sure that @bRandomFPV2 want on Moon.
But Arstrong, Aldrin, Bean, Conrad, Shepard, Mitchell, Scott, Irwin, Duke, Young, Cernan and Schmitt were there.
Bart Sibrel got what he deserve
How about Michael Collins?
JohanPro Gamer he didn’t touch the surface unfortunately
In the movie looks like they used launch sequence of Apollo 17 instead of 11. But should be the same, still nice. And 1969 was a documentary, 2018 is a movie.
I guess the point was to emphasize how powerful the rocket was, which makes sense.
That is not Gemini 8
Like an Xbox multiplay
No lo merecía.
It was a good movie, but I had a sense of dissatisfaction
Agreed. It felt like it didn't know where it wanted to go, it was 'pretty ok' but I have no interest in watching it again, I also didn't like how they turned Neil into such a gloomy, depressing character, when in reality he was described as being a very warm, engaging guy with a great sense of humor.
The found footage documentary 'Apollo 11', on the other hand, is fantastic- I watched it twice, once on Imax and again on standard screen, and pre-ordered the bluray. I can't wait to watch it again.
the only thing that i see wrong with the movie from these scenes is that Apollo 11 was launched during the day, while the movie is at night
(also they didn't show the American flag being planted on the moon, or Apollo 8 which pisses me off a bit)
Vox anyone?
"This movie should be called Third Man." -Russia
I understand the director's intent with the intimate shots, but damn was it annoying as fuck to see for 2.5 hours.
Gemini8
It's a great movie,,four another great movie..XD
The speed of the rocket from the movie changes abruptly at @6:26. weird.
thats the camera moving...
maybe one day we will rich this Moon
Agena lol
11:06
where's the part where neil talks about aliens on the moon for 2 minutes?
He didn't. There's no actual audio of that anywhere.
Lol that’s agena not Gemini
Me quedo con Apollo XIII. Esta peli me dejó amargado... Esperaba más. La verdad, el director es una verga
Too much drama in this movie, unnecessary. It tried to catch some emotions from audience. The Agena dock, the loss of control so oversaturated, such an excess of unuseful thrill, the rusted old cocktpits, so untrue (it was all brand new at every launch), a wife too hard and worried, not a moment of happyness or pure excitement, just a depressed lone man. This movie is such a shame to me, slow, predictable when not necessary and unpredictable when not necessary. Plus a plain soundtrack. Nothing glorious. It looks like the life of a depressed man doing something glorious and historical like he is wasting time. The whole movie does not represent the emotional breakdown it entire Apollo program had, the trip to the moon, the thousand of men involved. It just has few funny moments. Disappointed by all point of view.
So based on your rationale, no jokes is equal to bad movie. It's about Neil Armstrong, dude. The most introverted guy on the planet. He's serious when it comes to his job and this is the reason why he is so disconnected with his family, which btw led to his divorce. It's not trying to catch emotion from the audience by potraying him as a sad, moppy guy who disregards his family, that is what he was like. The guy lost his daughter to brain cancer and is having trouble dealing with it. How are you going to put jokes in a movie like that?
Also, this isn't about the Apollo programs or the men behind it. The title is literally First Man. If you're itching for it, you can find thousand of hours of documentaries on the Apollo program.
I agree with you 100%
they bended the real story to fit a particular vision of the director
the TV show From the Earth to the Moon was miles better
That’s because the movie is about a man, not the team. It’s not about “American Hero Neil Armstrong”, it’s about husband Neil Armstrong, father Neil Armstrong. It’s about a man faced with an impossibly large challenge and how lonely that made him. He was disconnected from his wife and kids because he didn’t think they could understand what he was facing. The only people he builds a connection with throughout the film are the other astronauts, most of which end up dead. He was alone, facing an impossible challenge but he still overcame it. If you’re looking for a 100% historically accurate film about Apollo 11 this isn’t the film for you. If you’re looking for a film about the strength and determination of the human mind than this film delivers exactly that. It’s not for everyone, but I don’t think criticising the film for not being something that it isn’t trying to be is not very fair. Maybe it just wasn’t marketed correctly but if you view the film as one about a human and not about a mission to send a people to the moon than you’ll enjoy the film much more.
@@luigi-yx7nc never mentioned jokes. It was a triumph, it's depicted like a psycho-drama. Now, if you want represent an historical event, because it's historical, you must be accurate. The whole movie is inaccurate, it's a vision of the director. And please, the rust on cockpit, tells a lot about this vision, not mentioning other personal views. A move that's slow, inaccurate and unnecessarily sad. Final thought: if director wanted to talk about Neil Armstrong's life and only about his persona, he could have shown Neil's life before or after Apollo. Instead he wanted to talk about Neil during Apollo missions, because for sure audience was attracted by that particular period of his life. Well then, that particular period was Apollo program and director was inaccurate and depicted by his personal and unrealistic point of view.
I just watched this. Sorry, but no go - abort! It just blew chunks in too many ways to list. With all of Hollywood's talent and big money and SPX capabilities ... seems they would have tried a lot harder to recreate the most historic event EVER!!
Why do you say that?
Bad movie.
How was the movie bad?
@@Judas_1989 I wouldn't call it bad, but for its budget and source material to pull from, it certainly could have been better. The cinematography was my biggest gripe. The writers' pacing also made for a very uneven watch for a seemingly straightforward plot.
In the end, I would applaud all the little guys up to the major actors who made this film possible. Who I would ding is the director.
Just my opinion though! Feel free to love or hate the movie...
@@dirtysaint5324 Well, the movie is more about Armstrong's life story, in which the Moon landing wasn't the centre of his life - his family and friends were. Hi lost his daughter, went through life disaster, lost his best friend. We all know about moonlanding etc, so I think Armstrong deserved a movie liek this, telling us about his life.
Yeah, the crater scene in the end, fucking broke my heart :) @@Judas_1989
No. This movie is not for u. Your choice-transformers.