Vince McMahon’s EX Janel Grant Movie Scene: ‘Theory of Everything’
Vložit
- čas přidán 25. 04. 2024
- Vince McMahon’s legal team issued a filing in response to Janel Grant’s lawsuit accusing McMahon of sex trafficking and other abuses during the course of his relationship with Grant, a former WWE employee.
From McMahon’s filing:
In fact, because the Parties wished to “preserve the confidential and private nature” of any disputes under the Agreement, they specifically provided in the Agreement that disputes would be resolved through arbitration. Plaintiff was represented by a lawyer who negotiated the Agreement for her before she executed it.
When Defendant learned that Plaintiff, despite her promises, had violated the Agreement by wrongfully disclosing both the existence of the Agreement and their relationship, he exercised his contractual right to withhold payment otherwise owed under the Agreement.
McMahon alleges that Grant broke their NDA, presumably during media coverage of and investigations into his 2022 hush money scandal. That led to his withholding payments to Grant she was to receive in exchange for signing the agreement and upholding its terms. Her suit accuses WWE of leaking her name and claims she was never contacted when the Board of Directors was looking into McMahon’s financial dealings. It seeks to have the NDA voided as a result of his stopping payment.
McMahon previously denied all the allegations in Grant’s suit against him, John Laurinaitis & WWE, and the memo generally and aggressively continues that denial:
For the avoidance of doubt, however, Defendant vehemently and categorically denies all allegations of wrongdoing in the Complaint, including Plaintiff’s outrageous claims that Defendant coerced Plaintiff into unwanted sexual acts, sexually assaulted and/or battered her, trafficked her, and defecated on her. Those are false statements intended for publicity.
When the Complaint’s allegations are adjudicated in the proper forum (arbitration), witnesses are called to testify under oath, and all communications between the Parties (including those authored by Plaintiff which she intentionally did not share in her Complaint) are produced, the allegations and claims will be disproven and Plaintiff will be exposed for the liar she is.
Contrary to Plaintiff’s false allegations, Plaintiff and Defendant (collectively, the “Parties”) engaged in a consensual relationship during which Defendant never coerced Plaintiff into doing anything and never mistreated her in any way.
In fact, in a love letter Plaintiff wrote to Defendant shortly before the Parties ended their relationship, Plaintiff described Defendant as “[m]y best friend, my love and my everything,” praising him for being the “wonderful, tender, vulnerable, heart-on-your-sleeve soul you really are.”
It is incredulous that Plaintiff, a then 42-year-old woman who claims on her resume to have a law degree from Pace University, would have written these words to Defendant months after all the events in the Complaint of alleged abuse, coercion, and “sex-trafficking” took place.
Grant’s suit argued that she was especially vulnerable when McMahon initiated a relationship with her, particularly due to her having been grieving the loss of her parents at the time and on the verge of financial collapse as a result of caring for them prior to their deaths. Several points in the McMahon memo aim to refute those claims:
Those statements are complete falsehoods. Based on a foreclosure action against Plaintiff and her parents, Plaintiff’s father passed away on April 18, 2017-two years before Plaintiff met Defendant - and his marital status was recorded as “widowed” confirming Plaintiff’s mother had passed earlier.
In McMahon’s accounting of it, he and Grant were involved in an open relationship. In particular, he says she was living with a man she was engaged to marry:
It is nonsensical that the disturbing alleged acts in the Complaint including violence, coerced sex, and forcing Plaintiff to be defecated on were taking place before Plaintiff returned to her lawyer fiancé four floors below without incident. Defendant was never contacted by Goncalves (who was on the Board of the luxury building), anyone at the building, the police, any friends of Plaintiff, or any lawyer or advocate for Plaintiff at any time about the fictitious, extensive, years-long abusive behavior alleged in the Complaint.
Grant’s lawyer, Ann Callis, issued a response to Post Wrestling about McMahon’s filing. Callis directly addresses the claims regarding her client’s parents and the “fiancé” Grant was living with when she met McMahon:
Vince McMahon has never known a storyline that he doesn’t twist to fit his own shameful narrative. Her father was in in-home hospice during his final days where Janel continued to care for him around the clock. Prior to his death, she had been caring for her blind, wheelchair-bound mother. Using the grief of someone who lost both of her parents is an all new level of disgusting.
#wwe #vincemcmahon #janelgrant - Zábava
who's side are you on? backstage controversies playlist: czcams.com/play/PLAPhIbhD4zCSGYM496M1Nsd_kHUBHoj8x.html
Well damn! Why didn’t they tell us? She was in a bit part of a movie no one saw a little under 20 years ago. Clearly she can’t be trusted.
HA! Vince is a fool
great clip! thanks man
YOU ARE QUICKLY BECOMING ONE OF MY FAVORITE CZcamsRS!
I agree, I hope Vince goes down for a long time. But, it doesn't sound very good for Janel. Not going to arbitration first might just screw her..
Man, I hope they have a plan that will get this to court. If vince is so innocent, he should want to argue in court like Johnny Depp did.
@@brokenkayfabe I totally agree, but Vince is a coward will try to stay away from court...
Does this has any relevance to the case? Cool finding tho.
Nah. Just excited to find this and wanted to share.
Yeah she is an actress and can pretend an act so there's a possibilty to consider
With any luck Vince will get indicted! If, that happens then it will probably go to court
I actually assumed she was full Asian or half Asian based off of the pics I saw of her. She looked almost 20 years younger than her actual age. In 2006, she would have been 24 I believe which is about how old I thought she initially was lol She could pass for 16 in this video. Could so imagine her playing a teenager in Pretty Little Liars when that show was big. She wants to take the civil case to court, and not settle at an arbitration level. If she was just doing this purely for financial gain, she would have been happy to accept a settlement at the arbitration level. To me it further emphasizes that McMahon is super guilty, and Janel also wants this lawsuit to give strength to others enough to tell their stories of sexual misconduct by Vince Plus, John Laurinaitis confirmed participating in the sexual misconduct in expressed in the lawsuit due to extreme pressure by McMahon. Though having his lawyer call him a victim like Janel Grant is a bit insulting and disgusting. Rape is rape when you force someone into non-consensual sexual acts where the victim is screaming no. Laurinaitis will get fried, but he's gonna make sure he brings Vince down with him. This erases all of their accomplishments in wrestling, Should have kept it in your pants Vince, and kept your perverse fantasies to yourself. BTW I just subscribed :)
cool
Thanks for this! Mcmahon is going down for sure! Lets go!!
Lol shut the fuck up marks Vince McMahon's innocent until proven guilty all of you
Keep dreaming. Vince McMahon will not do a single day in jail/prison.
Kiii
AEW