Higgs Boson (The God Particle) and Higgs Field Explained in Simple Words
Vložit
- čas přidán 9. 10. 2022
- The Higgs boson is a wave, ripple or disturbance in an invisible, all-permeating field called the Higgs field. In the year 1964, Peter Higgs, François Englert and four other scientists proposed a rather unique idea to explain why certain particles had mass. They hypothesized that the entire universe is filled with an invisible, all-permeating field that gives mass to all elementary particles.
The field in question is called the Higgs field. A wave, ripple or disturbance in that field is therefore called the Higgs boson, or the Higgs particle.
This theory suggests that particles do not have a mass of their own; rather, they get their mass by interacting with the Higgs field. How heavy a particle is will be determined by how strongly a particle interacts with the Higgs field. Electrons, quarks and other elementary particles interact with the Higgs field in different ways and therefore have different masses. Photons, however, don’t interact with the field, and thus have no mass.
#higgsboson #quantumphysics #particles
References
home.cern/science/physics/hig...
www.damtp.cam.ac.uk/user/tong...
home.cern/science/physics/hig...
Original Article Link: www.scienceabc.com/pure-scien...
If you wish to buy/license this video, please write to us at admin@scienceabc.com.
Voice Over Artist: John Staughton ( www.fiverr.com/jswildwood )
SUBSCRIBE to get more such science videos!
/ @scienceabc
Follow us on Twitter!
/ abc_science
Follow us on Facebook!
/ sciabc
Follow us on Instagram!
/ scienceabcofficial
Follow us on LinkedIn!
/ scienceabc
Follow our Website!
www.scienceabc.com - Věda a technologie
you can tell the editors had fun with this one lol
I’m only getting this recommendation because my phone listened to me discuss 3 Body Problem with my friend at a coffee shop.
lol That's insane
As an inquisitive child in the 60s, some teachers said too much, so, in 8th grade, I questioned my biology teacher to explain if all atoms were identical, how can they create so many different things in the world. I used an example of a trillion grains of sand, each grain being an atom, to create air and a human, etc. I'm just a curious kid but fairly smart. The teacher, this was in 1966, looked at me like I was a simpleton. He just expected us to accept reality for what it was, without ignorant questions. Took many years before I grasped more about how matter operates.
Did infinite cause the effect of finite or vice versa? The simple number line? Finite numbers can never increase to infinite but infinite being the beginning can decrease to finite. That is why the God particle logically can't cause the effect of matter, it is pursuing larger instead of larger pursuing smaller.
What came first energy or matter? Einstein was right. M=E/c² God's creation equation. This isn't getting something physical from nothing physical but something not physical ie energy causing the effect of matter which is physical.
What came first life or death? LOGICALLY death can't increase to life but life decreases to death. LOGICALLY life had to cause the effect of life in the universe. Infinite God must exist as an ABSOLUTE to cause the effect of your finite life that decreases to death.
Evolution is based on A is B Illogical impossible contradictions being true which are ABSOLUTELY LOGICALLY OBJECTIVELY FALSE
A non cell caused the effect of
B a cell
A is B a false scientific hypothesis
A is B
A is non life caused the effect of
B life
A is B a false scientific hypothesis
A non conscious caused the effect of
B your conscious mind
A is B a false scientific hypothesis only
a conscious mind can cause the effect of a conscious mind to avoid A is B Illogical impossible contradiction.❤😂🎉😢😮😅😊
@@robertvann7349Why does life LOGICALLY have to cause life in the universe? Why does in infinite god have to exist as an ABSOLUTE to cause the effect of you finite life that decreases to death?
Where do you get that from?
I believe for something to be dead, it must have lived so life should come first before death. In what scenario does death come first? What exactly are you debating?
Instant subscribing level of quality! Keep it up!
But what tells that particle to interact with the Higgs field? Would that not be information within that particle?
Brilliant explanation
Why does it decay as soon as its detected?, and so it doesn't decay until it is detected?.
i am confused about "mass" and "mass" in terms of matter. would you get more matter if you interacted more strongly with the higgs field and thus more weight?!.... that seems kinda weird.
the stronger your interaction with the higgs field is the more mass you get sounds like you get heavier. but how can you get more "mass" just by interacting with a field? where does that matter come from... i have been thinking to much about this.
Clear as mud.
Not super clear but definitely clearer than mud. I'd say like muddy water
I lost track when did we get from a field to a molecule we can visibly see/measure ?
Is it a field like electron field ?
A molecule is something made from more than one atom bonded together.
Atoms in turn are made up of sub-atomic particles.
I think you mean particle?
Particles don't really exist in the way people imagine. I.e. As tiny, "solid" spherical things.
We don't know how it exists exactly, and might not even be possible to know. But people came up mathematical models that are able to reliably make predictions (predictions that seem to reliably align with whatever reality actually is), this reliability in the model's application to reality, gives insights that makes interpretations possible.
The model represents everything as a field (a coordinate system). Wave-like oscillations are observed in this field, both mathematically and physically. E.g. Photons, electrons, protons and even large molecules physically display wave-like properties under the right conditions.
"A particle" is a disturbance of a specific energy in a specific field. Technically that disturbance is happening everywhere in the universe, but 99% of this disturbance is located inside a tiny region...and that region we refer to as a particle.
But that region can change size and even shape. In this model it can travel like the ripple waves in a pond, but collapse into a small space when the wider wave interacts with other "stuff" (desturbaces in fields). It can exist in sphirecal shapes, tear drop shapes, donut shapes, whatever that is that's going on with the shapes in lavalamp, etc.
An electron is just a disturbance in the electric field. It exists everywhere, but 99% of its existence is found in a small region (a redion that can change shape and size).
Here's an example of how this model has been applied to reality, for our benefit.
In the device you're using to read this, is a data storage component called NAND flash. Bits of data are stored in the form of voltage. That voltage is created and reduced by moving elections into and out of a "cell".
It's how those electrons are moved into the cell that makes use of the interpretation that electrons are not particles but exist probabilistically instead.
If those electrons were particles, then the following would've been the equivalent of teleporting electrons accross a barrier they can't move through.
But here's how that "teleportation" is really achieved. The electron is assumed to have a probabilistic existence. 99% of its existence form a kind of electron cloud.
A magnetic field is applied to this cloud that is 99% of the electron's existence, which distorts that electron's 99% existence toward and accross the barrier. The electron now partially exists on both sides of the barrier.
When the electron is interacted with, it's existence collapses into a smaller point, with a 99% chance that it will collapse to a random location inside where 99% of its existence is located.
Sometimes, that point is on the other side of the barrier. Voila, an electron was just "teleported" accross a barrier.
In reality, that electron has always been on the other side of that barrier (since it's technically everywhere in the universe). All we've done is manipulate the shape of 99% of its existence, and then manipulated that size (to sometimes collapse on the other side.)
And voila, your device is able to store bits of information. Incredibly reliably. In other words, the model isn't purely theoretical. It's being reliably applied to all sorts of things people take for granted in their daily lives.
It's the same with all other sub-atomic particles. They're excitations in various fields, and 99% of where that excitation is occurring, we refer to as the particle.
We call mistakenly named it particles because, when we first encountered them, we only observed things in their collapsed form (collapsed to a point).
Except light. Light we've been able to see doing both particle behavior and wave behavior for a long time...investigating that, partly led to all this stuff call quantum physics.
@@tylerdurden3722 thank you for writing this out beautiful stuff.
If I understood your cell model the electron interacts with the magnetic field to reform itself within a space it could technically exist in. My question would be how we manipulate the shape of the electron cloud within the electron can exist. Otherwise we would be creating random shocks in space. Jeez I hope I understood the model right reading that last sentence of mine sounds dull headed, but I hope you can get my thought process. If electron is appearing on other side of cell barrier what stops it from appearing in the screen for example. Would that even do anything? Would the electron decay back into its field, or does it just stabilize since it’s a disturbance of the field? Oh man so many interesting questions of how life interacts with itself.
I’m grateful for your comment already very insightful, you don’t have to answer this jesters questions but it sure would be cool. Stay blessed Tyler.
@@tylerdurden3722Ayo this was very well written🔥🙏🏽
So the energy is electron ? But on the other hand energy is ability to do work( heat and light). It is a little paradox. What is energy ? An property or a particle ? Wikipedia says electron is a charged particle, on the other hand says energy is the ability to do work.
What if the higs field was called by previous scientists : ether
Look at the periodic table. Look at all the elements and the atomic mass. The basic building blocks of the universe are the things most likely to make it to the end of space time. Now ask yourself what if you started adding electrons to different elements.
Really interesting
Glad you think so!
Does a photon shine/radiate light in the dark ? If there are electromagnetic field in the dark it mean ther are photons there( in the field ,what about in the dark ,are there photons in the field ? Or are black photons there ? 😊
Thanks
Explained perfectly! Thanks for the video.
You're welcome!
boy you didnt understand anything
@@nahbea LMAO
Awesome.
Thank you! Cheers! Please consider subscribing to the channel. 😊
😊 una cosa es el bosón de Higgs y otra cosa es el campo de Higgs que lo generó, son 2 cosas diferentes 😊, así es también como se pueden generar diferentes partículas incluso desde la energía oscura y de los fotones cuando adquieren masa y se transforman en materia y dejan de ser energía 😊😅😅😅😅
Good stuff...
Glad you enjoyed it
Explain higgs field interaction with other particles. I could have done that.
"The God*mn particle" 😂
Hilarious name for the frustration to detect this particle
What creates the Higgs field? The Big Bang? Sagittarius A or our Sun?
is it possible to remove the higgs particle from an atom?
My little research says it is not possible to extract Higgs boson (particle as you used), from an atom. Because Higgs boson only plays a role in giving mass to an atom and not a constituent of the mass (atom). Hope that helps
tHanks man i got everything, thank god they found higgs boson before he tried to end the world. Glad he's safe.
real
Really I like
How about electrons? Do electrons have mass?
Yes
Yes, but with Heisenberg uncertainty.
If Higgs boson decays to smaller particles instantly , then how Higgs field exists!
i thought that the quote was 'that god damned' particle. ???
But is this powerful enough to "end the world"?
So, the scientists say.
so simple😀😃😄
maybe it is not god but angel.
😂😅
You are looking at this wrong. It is just let a magnetic field. You are only looking at the top of it like the northern hemisphere. It could cross over to the southern hemisphere when you look for it. Everything is traveling thru just like the planets to the sun in the middle of the fields. That is how it connects to each other and how the particles are moving and holding together.
So... theres some sort of field or spmthing, that runs through everything, aaaand disturbance in this field gives an illusion of mass to everything (except light), aaand this is all theory anyway and we cannot fully explain any of this and theres no practical aplications. Got it.
0:26
Every time you hit any object hard enough pieces break of so this is actually a waste of time. AM I wrong
A lot of scientific advancements happen by pursuing things that seem like a waste of time initially
Why is Mr. Bean the physic at the end hahahah
Gud way to explain
Glad you liked it
Yep thunk u
A particle without mass, strange. Is like : a body without mass. If it is called a body it must have mass. There is no possibility. There is no way out .
💫🙏
Was that a Mr Bean cameo at the end😂
We can measure the waves to measure the force of the universe's explosions. 😂 How interesting, will the waves affect space travel? 😅
Please give credit to the Indian scientist Satyendra Nath Bose who theorised god particle.
😂 I just googled this guy has nothing to do with God particles.
His contribution was for bose Einstein condensate which has nothing to do wilth higgs field
Pada makrokosmos ada atom yang bermuatan proton neutron dan elektron.. Yang pada-nya ada sifat zatKu. Dan pada mikrokosmos ada qalb yang bermuatan fuad syaghofa dan lubb.. Yang pada-nya ada sirr dan didalam sirr itu ada Aku😔#
😁🙏
All founded on quicksand.we are dreaming this stuff up.there is no substance holding anything together.just like in our sleeping dreams the same is going on in our waking times.we make it all up
Everything about humanity is happening in a dream and therefore does not actually exist,
😅😮😮😅😅😅😅😅😅😅well information good show you 😅😅😅
Thanks 😅
😅😅😅😅well information good show you can 😅😅😅
Thanks 😅
Im even more confused. 🎉
Py
They really hate God, even the narrator has disdain in his voice. Also I might add that all religions are cool with them except Jesus...so that is really the focal point. Jesus is God and you can only enter heaven through him. It costs you nothing to believe and the time is almost up. We all know God wins in the end so stick with the Father of all the Universe that you are scrutinizing. Besides, believing in "nothing" is really depressing. I know you scientists all have to think what your told or you loose your paycheck, that should show anyone the level of control it has over you. Just think tho on the bight side, Cern is doing the will of God and this I thank you for.
tf
why are the women so round
Matthew 6:10 KJV: Thy kingdom come. Thy will be done in earth, as it is in heaven.
tf
Isn’t it ironic a company with that logo found the God particle? Jesus died for your sins and he loves you. There’s only two choices good or evil truth or deception. We are all sinners that need a savior.
CERN isn't a company and their logo depicts their colliders from a top-down perspective.
Go away.
@@davidn4956 you should search your heart brother. I got every right to be here as you do.
Answer axxe80's response 😂@@CP3Crossover
There is no God particle, there is God.
Yeah because you Say so! Lol clown. We see it's clear you hate Him.
Why are you on a science channel? If it wasn’t for physics we wouldn’t have our modern lives as we know it.
@@karimah8687 Oh your comment is so ironic lol
@@karimah8687 If it wasn't for God we wouldn't have our lives in the first place.
@@aussietribulationgirl7177 please explain the irony in Karima’s comment?