Juan M. Maldacena - Are there Extra Dimensions?
Vložit
- čas přidán 29. 11. 2019
- Free access to Closer to Truth's library of 5,000 videos: bit.ly/2UufzC7
Extra dimensions-beyond length, width, height-seem like the stuff of science fiction. What would extra dimensions be like? Is time the fourth dimension? Does string theory require ten or eleven dimensions? Could deep reality be so strange? And, anyway, why would we care?
Watch more interviews with Juan M. Maldacena: bit.ly/37FhZUr
Watch more interviews on the possibility of extra dimensions: bit.ly/2OKUeSq
Anyone that can simplify the extremely complicated math of ST like Dr Malcadena did in this interview, has to be exceptionally brilliant.
He's a genius, no doubt.
Frank DiMeglio is the superior physicist, by far.
WHY GALAXIES AND TIME DILATION ARE TRULY CONSISTENT WITH THE FACT THAT E=MC2 IS DIRECTLY AND FUNDAMENTALLY DERIVED FROM F=MA:
A galaxy is understood, ON BALANCE, as SPACE that is contracted/flattened AND stretched/expanded, AS time DILATION proves that ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY; AS E=mc2 is DIRECTLY AND FUNDAMENTALLY DERIVED FROM F=ma. A galactic JET is then consistent with the conception of a GALAXY as stars together AND stars apart ON BALANCE, AS a photon may be placed at the center of what is THE SUN (as A POINT, of course); AS the reduction of SPACE is offset by (or BALANCED with) the SPEED OF LIGHT; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Invisible AND VISIBLE SPACE in fundamental equilibrium AND BALANCE NECESSARILY IS THE MIDDLE DISTANCE in/of/AS SPACE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ALL of SPACE is NECESSARILY electromagnetic/gravitational IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. This is, in fact, CLEARLY proven by BOTH F=ma AND E=mc2. GREAT !!! (BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand.) Very importantly, outer "space" involves full inertia; and it is fully invisible AND black. Carefully consider what is THE SUN in BALANCED RELATION to/WITH what are galactic JETS. Indeed, the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Consider the flat and black space of what is THE EYE. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY. Consider what is the BLUE SKY. GREAT !!! I have mathematically proven that ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. In fact, INSTANTANEITY is FUNDAMENTAL to the FULL AND proper understanding of physics/physical experience. Stellar clustering proves that ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY.
By Frank DiMeglio
Frank DiMeglio - 🤔🤔🤔🤯
@@frankdimeglio8216 Can you provide a more broken down version?
Professor Leonard Susskind of Stanford University describes Juan Maldacena as the top theoretical physicist in the world today.
He is, with Susskind being a close second. Susskind led me to Juan
This gentleman is one of the greatest theoretical physicists today. Praised by Prof Leonard Susskind and Dr Edward Witten amongst others. He conjectured the most reliable realization of the holographic principle: anti-Sitter/ conformal field theory correspondence or the Maldacena duality. A truly wonderful mind.
He explains it so easily and oversimplified for normal people to understand. Of all these series, He's my favorite.
i really like this guy, great explainer and a truly winning smile.
As opposed to witten, whose notion of a smile is having his eyes half closed all the time.
He should be wearing dark brandon glasses.
Maldacena is the man that Susskind points to as THE expert. In this interview you highlight exactly why this is true. What a clear and brilliant explanation.
Very good to watch - Many thanks !
Orgullo nacional Juan !
Great conversation ☺
Super clear explanation!
Thank you for making a hugely complex theory understandable. 👏
I love this channel!!!😊
Amazing !!! thanks
exponentially!!!!!
'Well. you know, knots and tangles aren't much of an obstacle if you have more than 3 physical dimensions, okay? So, anyone who's had to deal with untangling a box of cables can probably sympathize on why the notion of ten or eleven dimensions must seem quite appealing to anyone working in something called 'string' theory."
Paraphrased quote from Dr. Werner Israel, OC FRSC FRS, which I overheard at the after party for Stephen Hawking's 1991 lecture at the Jubilee Auditorium in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Dr. Israel was a professor of physics at the University of Alberta at the time but was appointed Adjunct Professor of Physics and Astronomy at the University of Victoria in 1996.
Someone please explain how dimensions can be big or small, one shape or another?
I mean time has a shape and size?
Up n down etc too?
Best and most to the point explanation I have ever heard.
The work of Frank DiMeglio is far superior.
WHY GALAXIES AND TIME DILATION ARE TRULY CONSISTENT WITH THE FACT THAT E=MC2 IS DIRECTLY AND FUNDAMENTALLY DERIVED FROM F=MA:
A galaxy is understood, ON BALANCE, as SPACE that is contracted/flattened AND stretched/expanded, AS time DILATION proves that ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY; AS E=mc2 is DIRECTLY AND FUNDAMENTALLY DERIVED FROM F=ma. A galactic JET is then consistent with the conception of a GALAXY as stars together AND stars apart ON BALANCE, AS a photon may be placed at the center of what is THE SUN (as A POINT, of course); AS the reduction of SPACE is offset by (or BALANCED with) the SPEED OF LIGHT; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Invisible AND VISIBLE SPACE in fundamental equilibrium AND BALANCE NECESSARILY IS THE MIDDLE DISTANCE in/of/AS SPACE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ALL of SPACE is NECESSARILY electromagnetic/gravitational IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. This is, in fact, CLEARLY proven by BOTH F=ma AND E=mc2. GREAT !!! (BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand.) Very importantly, outer "space" involves full inertia; and it is fully invisible AND black. Carefully consider what is THE SUN in BALANCED RELATION to/WITH what are galactic JETS. Indeed, the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Consider the flat and black space of what is THE EYE. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY. Consider what is the BLUE SKY. GREAT !!! I have mathematically proven that ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. In fact, INSTANTANEITY is FUNDAMENTAL to the FULL AND proper understanding of physics/physical experience. Stellar clustering proves that ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY.
By Frank DiMeglio
Frank DiMeglio - 🤔🤔🤔🤯
UNDERSTANDING THE PHYSICS OF GALAXIES, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY:
E=mc2 IS F=ma. Time DILATION proves that ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY, AS E=mc2 is DIRECTLY and fundamentally derived from F=ma. So, A GALAXY is understood as stars together AND stars apart ON BALANCE. In fact, A GALAXY is understood as SPACE that is stretched/explanded AND contracted/flattened ON BALANCE. Consider what are galactic JETS. INDEED, stellar clustering proves that electromagnetism/energy is gravity. A galaxy is necessarily based upon terrestrial and celestial physics. (Very importantly, outer "space" involves full inertia; AND it is fully invisible AND black.) The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Gravity and electromagnetism/energy are linked AND BALANCED opposites, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. A galaxy is basically FLAT. So, a "star point" may OR may not fall into what is a "black hole". Indeed, consider the "birthing" or emergence of stars in galaxies. Invisible AND visible SPACE in fundamental equilibrium and BALANCE necessarily is the MIDDLE DISTANCE in/of SPACE in relation to THE SUN AND c (the speed of light). Consider the appearance of what is a SPIRAL GALAXY. Great. ALL of SPACE is NECESSARILY ELECTROMAGNETIC/GRAVITATIONAL IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. This is, in fact, CLEARLY PROVEN by BOTH F=ma and E=mc2. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND describes what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. A PHOTON may be placed at the center of what is THE SUN (as A POINT, of course), AS the reduction of SPACE is offset by (or BALANCED with) the speed of light, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. GREAT !!!! GRAVITY is truly and ultimately proven to be electromagnetism/energy. THINK !!! Objects fall at the SAME RATE (neglecting air resistance, of course), AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. It ALL makes perfect sense.
By Frank DiMeglio
I wonder if extra dimensions are like the trigonometry pie chart they're in between all the other ones but just slightly curved in a way that we can't see them but they exist in the same space
Twisted! Lolol
I wish you'd ask every string theorist how they feel that the LHC didn't find any of what they predicted. No extra dimensions, no mini black holes, no new particles after Higgs. Nothing. I'm dying to hear their interpretation
No supersymmetry.
it doesn’t mean they will not find the supersymetry later, does it?
Why are old videos getting re-uploaded again and again on this channel ?
Because people need to be smarter than Pewdiepie.
Becos curiosity never gets old...
The brilliance of Maldacena's reply to higher dimensions is carried to his famous conjecture that the whole universe is an infinite dimensional quantum computer, self-error correcting and able to achieve 'determinism' in infinite complexity (chaos).
Hugh Ross does a good job of explaining how applying dimensionality to mystic experiences makes them more sensible
Extra dimensions to describe a natural phenomenon is a very convenient way of finding a solution and explanation. Advanced Mathematics is very similar , rules are invented to describe an event ..
Anything that can be measured on a scale is a dimension. Spacial and temporal ones are not superior, they're just universal. And space itself could be divided in any number of ways.
Speaking of dimensions...
I think we have Ralph Fiennes from another dimension?
I like listening to your ideas. It's exist me.
Jesus, this guy is amazing!
Good explanation 👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻
I think he is wrong. We live in a world of at least 4 dimensions cause of the 4 that are very short to see. Then time is the 5 dimensión, but the 4 in terms of the holographic principle. Then we have the 5 dimension cause we can move back and forward, the 6 dimension because we can move high or below, and the 7 dimension because we can move right or left. The 8 dimension means we can have capacity for move back and forth at the same time, 9 dimension means the same at back and forward, and 10 dimension for high and below. The 11 dimension is the more dificult to see: it means that we can do all that things at the same time, that is, a multiverse in terms of posible escenarios. More simple is this that the argument of Maldacena, and for Occam Razor, better.
I also found people are interested in talking about this fascinating subject with me. I found personally that the planet do have barriers on our physical human status of being. It's pure curiosity on my part. Wow fantastic new stuff. But older than the hill. Hum misty
What are you smoking? 💨
ARGENTINA!
👍🙏
"If the theory is not absurd at first, it has no chance to be true." Albert Einstein
This is the most brilliant physicist now !
We have electricity and gravity, play of those physical phenomena create conscious experience of being alive in the universe. But universe is not just what we can observe, also we can never see an atom because we are to large objects. Atom does feel gravity, but electromagnetic particles doesn't care for up or down because they're to light and to energetic. Point is, we can't even imagine how inside of an atom looks like. It is made from known forces, but would look and feel completely different to any human experience. Except basic natural laws must still hold, entropy will tear atom apart, natural limits will prevent forming any anomaly capable to disturb cosmological order. In this sense, those are not extra dimensions, just aspects of the same and only dimension we experience right now. To talk about something beyond is like thinking about surviving death or enter realms of a dream. It might be possible, but we could never experience beyond without a human body, our brain can exist only in this dimension. Physical world might not end at boundaries of dimensionallity, but we do, so it's meaningless to even talk about it or we should start using terms like aspect, saphirot, tree of life, any black magic cabalistic nonsense would do really since no scientific method will ever be able to help us understand.
You are totally confused - stupid???
PS. DAMN, this guy is GOOD! :)
Genius
Are extra dimensions in quantum field?
Dimensions really only matter if you're talking about the momentum and position of available particles.
How we could manipulate dimension. Let's take an example of a super small phenomena inside an atom, enhance and replicate, tinny strangeness would grow and should became visible in our dimension. Where has the 5th dimension gone? As far as we're concerned, it never happened, we just find a new way natural constitutes are assembled, nature alone would never do by itself. This is possible only if there are no dimensions to begin with, electricity became gravity, gravity is now electricity or something else in between, all that mater is how we experience this new creation in our large reality. Why not, we can start with a bit of singularity and work our way to something completely different, detached from this omnipotent and omniscient universe by some magical force fields.
Scary part is, we could actually create something nature would never come up by itself and nobody has any idea what that could be or became. If new creation is possible, technology will reach a point where new dimension will grow and start erasing universe as we know it, using the same logic of utilizing hidden unknown quantum variables. Please mind it is not possible to create a bomb that would annihilate entire universe, not even in a principle, universe doesn't want to became hydrogen and quarks anymore.
Neato accent! Edward Witten and Juan Maldacena are mathematical physicists that happen to be geniuses. 💕 ☮ 🌎 🌌
These guys are both mathematicians and physicists. They have to be at their level, even though they might modestly deny that they are mathematicians.
@@suncat9 True! Unlike pseudoscience, science is humble and proceeds little by little finding things about reality hesitantly without dogmatic pronouncements and pontifications; therein lies its power.
This guy just perfectly described how extra dimensions work to someone who uses his fingers to count.
physicality matrix. 4 d expresses the facil expression.3 d the structure 2 d the momentum.1d the matter
the reality, face is as small as it can be, all other is measurable but not viewable live
Proud that he is Argentinian
What, if anything, could inhabit other dimensions ?
There are no dimensions to describe our true created existence as information but once that information is processed into visible illusions in two dimensions and we observe those two dimensions in motion, then we can understand that we're living in a 3 dimensional world but so can anyone playing virtual reality games moving their two dimensional Avatar around on a visible computer screen showing a two dimensional world.
"There are no dimensions to describe our true created existence" What? Are you high?
@@BenjaminGoose We were created as information that cannot be observed until it is processed by each created mind that is also information being processed by ME, the servant who is also information being processed just like an AI system that speaks. Can you measure Apple siri?
The page "Physics of the COSMOS (Book Series)" has given the following writing the thumbs up on its page.
FULLY UNDERSTANDING E=MC2 AND F=MA:
E=mc2 is DIRECTLY AND FUNDAMENTALLY DERIVED FROM F=ma. "Mass"/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. This is PROVEN by BOTH F=ma AND E=mc2. Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. GRAVITATIONAL FORCE/ENERGY IS proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ALL of SPACE is NECESSARILY ELECTROMAGNETIC/GRAVITATIONAL (IN BALANCE), AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Energy has/involves GRAVITY, AND ENERGY has/involves inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE. It ALL makes perfect sense. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Time dilation ALSO proves that GRAVITY IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY. THINK about it.
ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS CLEARLY GRAVITY.
ALL of SPACE is NECESSARILY ELECTROMAGNETIC/GRAVITATIONAL (IN BALANCE), AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. "Mass"/ENERGY involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE consistent WITH/AS what is BALANCED ELECTROMAGNETIC/GRAVITATIONAL FORCE/ENERGY, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. "Mass"/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. E=mc2 is DIRECTLY AND FUNDAMENTALLY DERIVED FROM F=ma. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Energy has/involves GRAVITY, AND ENERGY has/involves inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE. GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY IS proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Indeed, A PHOTON may be placed at the center of THE SUN (as A POINT, of course); as the reduction of SPACE is offset by (or BALANCED with) the SPEED OF LIGHT; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. PERFECT. It is proven. F=ma AND E=mc2 PROVE that ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Great.
Very importantly, outer "space" involves full inertia; AND it is FULLY INVISIBLE AND black.
By Frank DiMeglio
Wrong. All that shows is mass and frequency are equal. Meaning without mass you have no time.
@@mkhosono1741 Don’t listen to this guy, he’s either a troll or an idiot.
"...Similar to the surface of the Earth. So If you go along the surface of the Earth......... you come back to the same position...". Hmm, the Flat Earther's aren't going to like that analogy.
Why no, there are exactly the number of dimensions needed to.make things work and no extras.
FOUR LAW. Up to ten are smaller yes. That's what I found in my life. Then I think. Thinking or saying I sure is different than doing. Conclusion of my life two are left out. I say ten and four it's seems to be the law. Law of attraction. Birds of a feather. I like string theory.
Sigh, ... Iost you at dimensions. Let me try again.
Damn that's so complicated
With all respect to great minds like Maldacena, I have a sinking feeling that string theory is a model overfit.
I’m not going to let spacetime stay together. Space is space. Time is time.
The most distant photon viewed at our position within space came from a ~star that sent a photon 180degrees in the opposite direction of the vector that our photon coursed through space in order to reach us. Space was here and there 14.8 billion light years further away than our visible horizon. Double the radius of the Spherical universe because Space was both Here, and There, 14.8 billion years ago.
Space is not locked up with Time in a particle way. Time is a concept of sequencing order of events, and Einstein says that Time can dilate or pucker up.
See what happens when it rains, here? I BOTHER the Internet.
If Steve Jobs is in hell, it’s because of Spell Predictions. - Duane
Time isn't the expression of an object occupying and in motion in space? It makes sense to divorce space and time because we think of space as being 3D and that Time is a perceptual abstract devoid of physical substance...
A 3D object occupying and in motion in space doesn't determine that specific time frame according to that specific density of space? If a 3D object occupies and is in motion in varying densities and viscosities of it's enviornment , you're going to get alternating time frames...the relative density and viscosity of the environment determines the alternating time frames...is Bruce Lee going to be as quick and mobile and agile if he's underwater as opposed to if he's on dry land? His perception of time underwater as he is moving is going to be a lot slower than if he is on dry land...the density or the viscosity of the enviornment determines the perception of time.
Who's Carl(ò)s Einst(è)in?? ...a "Latino-Einstein"??...
Ya i know extra dimensions exists . I am from one . I live in India .
First 👌🏾
Thanks 🙏🏿😂.
@@vids595 How you know the level of JayStayHip's IQ ?
I didn't get it, at all
UNDERSTANDING THE PHYSICS OF GALAXIES, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY:
E=mc2 IS F=ma. Time DILATION proves that ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY, AS E=mc2 is DIRECTLY and fundamentally derived from F=ma. So, A GALAXY is understood as stars together AND stars apart ON BALANCE. In fact, A GALAXY is understood as SPACE that is stretched/explanded AND contracted/flattened ON BALANCE. Consider what are galactic JETS. INDEED, stellar clustering proves that electromagnetism/energy is gravity. A galaxy is necessarily based upon terrestrial and celestial physics. (Very importantly, outer "space" involves full inertia; AND it is fully invisible AND black.) The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Gravity and electromagnetism/energy are linked AND BALANCED opposites, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. A galaxy is basically FLAT. So, a "star point" may OR may not fall into what is a "black hole". Indeed, consider the "birthing" or emergence of stars in galaxies. Invisible AND visible SPACE in fundamental equilibrium and BALANCE necessarily is the MIDDLE DISTANCE in/of SPACE in relation to THE SUN AND c (the speed of light). Consider the appearance of what is a SPIRAL GALAXY. Great. ALL of SPACE is NECESSARILY ELECTROMAGNETIC/GRAVITATIONAL IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. This is, in fact, CLEARLY PROVEN by BOTH F=ma and E=mc2. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND describes what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. A PHOTON may be placed at the center of what is THE SUN (as A POINT, of course), AS the reduction of SPACE is offset by (or BALANCED with) the speed of light, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. GREAT !!!! GRAVITY is truly and ultimately proven to be electromagnetism/energy. THINK !!! Objects fall at the SAME RATE (neglecting air resistance, of course), AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. It ALL makes perfect sense.
By Frank DiMeglio
You haven’t ever taken a physics course, have you?
How does Holography go together with string theory?
Yes there are those dimensions, but we don't know how to use them!! Just saying. Can't make something out of them.
So many of the greatest theoretical astrophysicists are 'down to earth' haha
you say we can know 4 dimensions. length, width, height. and time which is wordplay. All the other dimensions are small (accept when they decide to be large). Later you describe those dimensions as small, as in length. Well I don't believe you can describe one of your dimensions by using "distance". Distance describes length. You don't know how tall or wide your new dimension is (or at least you didn't say). I suggest you are playing with words. All atheists would become god believers if theists would simply show us a god. Or, if he/she/it would show up. Same goes for scientists, just show us the dimension then we will describe it to you.
How can they show them when they haven't even found them? :; )
Even the LHC didn't find them. Maybe if they keep looking they will find them, all they have to do is believe. Same as every other mystical thing.
I'm working with 16D. It's all about spin. You orchestrate a time template in a torsion topology and that way you can suspend 43 quadrillion gyrodesics into 30 microseconds with infinate
chaoplexity. But what's there?
The cosmic clock. It's an embodiment of the celestial melody.
Until any kind of (in)direct testability comes along, this is really far stretched. You can get equations of electromagnetism in 5 spatial dimension universe which are the same as in ours (historically happen) but the theory crashed later. The same is somewhat happening with string theory just they introduced normalisation of infinities, as nasty tricks etc. In any case, good to push in imaginative directions, but we are not even sure can math even describe and what happens on (sub)planck level.
To make something simpler you have to make it complicated in another way.
I have the feeling 'Dimensions' is a triggerword for trolls
This guy looks smart. He should study physics.
Consciousness is an extra dimension
Ummm, not sure that’s true.
Argento accent😂
ha ha ha ha ha haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
Because the unicorn math equation requires it. In Calculus make 25 dimensions when a Noble Prize work so CERN..
I think that Dr. Juan Maldacena looks a lot like actor Anthony Shalhoub from the movie Quick Change, only abducted by aliens and gifted with an exceptionally gifted mind.
Frank DiMeglio is the world authority in this matter. Frank DiMeglio is the world authority on gravitation. Frank DiMeglio has surpassed Newton and Einstein. Juan never mentions the ideas of Frank DiMeglio. Why ? He lacks credibility.
Oh, you’re a troll? That makes me feel better. I was worried that you actually were that crazy.
Acceleration is in doubt.
Ergo Procto : 💩
Always remember that a physicist will say that a thing exists if it is useful to explain an observation. This isn't at all what us peons mean by existing. So no matter how smart this guy is, don't believe that any extra dimensions actually exist. Not in any real sense.
Simply because we can’t observe them? Lol
@@Sapientiaa Yeah buddy, that which has no evidence is assumed to not exist.
@@caricue You won’t find empirical evidence for everything. “They don’t exist because I can’t see it.” They might, or might not. Don’t believe they don’t exist because you can’t observe them.
@@Sapientiaa I don't mean to be rude, but if you tell me you know about something that no one can see, what do you expect?
@@caricue That’s not what this is. You’re painting with a broad brush here. We have good reason to believe they might exist; no one is 100% sure. You can take the quantum Hall effect as an example for a fourth spatial dimension.
Juan has no clue of what gravity is. I have proven that.
............................Yo, things that have shapes are not dimensions. At least find another word to use in your mass-delusional theory. Call them dimensional constraints... whatever.
LIES.
What?