How Roger Penrose Destroyed The Big Bang Theory?
Vložit
- čas přidán 11. 07. 2023
- Welcome to our new video, exploring Sir Roger Penrose's Conformal Cyclic Cosmology (CCC) theory and his profound critiques of the standard Big Bang theory. In this enlightening journey, we'll delve deep into Penrose's ground-breaking hypothesis, a paradigm shift in cosmology that challenges our fundamental understanding of the universe.
Penrose, a renowned mathematical physicist, introduces CCC as a radical alternative to conventional cosmology, proposing an eternal and cyclic universe. Instead of one singular Big Bang, he posits an infinite series of cosmic 'aeons,' each beginning with its own Big Bang, and ending in a smooth, expansive phase called the 'conformal infinity.'
Critiquing the standard Big Bang model, Penrose questions the 'cosmological singularity' - a point of infinite temperature and density, suggesting it's a mathematical artifact rather than physical reality. He also takes issue with Cosmic Inflation, a pillar of standard cosmology designed to explain the uniformity of the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB). Penrose argues that these finely-tuned initial conditions are highly improbable.
Instead, he suggests looking for evidence in the present universe that hints at a previous aeon. Penrose's theory predicts concentric circles of lower-than-average temperature in the CMB - these 'Hawking Points,' are thought to be the final echo of black hole evaporation events from a previous cosmic cycle.
Join us as we probe the depths of these fascinating ideas, unpacking their implications for our understanding of cosmological phenomena like dark energy, entropy, and black holes. We'll explore the controversy and discussion Penrose's CCC theory has sparked among scientists, and how it may reshape our cosmic story.
Stay tuned for this exploration into the very fabric of the universe, a tantalizing journey into the cyclical nature of reality that will stretch your imagination to the outer limits. This is a must-watch for anyone keen on high-energy physics, quantum gravity, and the mysteries of cosmology. Subscribe, like, and hit the notification bell for more intriguing insights into the cosmos! - Věda a technologie
At 2:04 good representation of memory/potential overlap- where time exists begins & ends.
Very lovely video a good awaited one. The CCC that geometry that change the vision multiple cyclic repeating univers. No end yet a endpoint signature. That's too on big bang cosmology.
Neutrino , low frequency cw gravitational waves are a challenge of flat apperent universe /s.
This channel worth appreciation , with good knowledge and ideas.
Really nice video , the graphics were really pretty did you make them yourself? I worked on graphics for the SkyDivePhil account of this idea if you know his video. Your narration was well written.
8:00 I was following this beautiful presentation, one might say 'poetic'. And in my mind I saw from afar a dying Universe of miniscule size compared to mine. Scale had of necessity increased between then and now but I don't know how ... a cosmic Klein bottle comes to mind? ( no rhyming intended as I am crap at that). Perhaps it is 'many worlds' consecutive rather than concurrently?
This is narrated by, written by and set to the visuals of neural networks. AI.
Its not even wrong, it hits all the top points and was likely fact-checked and edited by humans, but it also doesn't actually EXPLAIN these models. It just says the same surface level talking points over and over. But if youre hungry for more, PBS Space time has real smart humans showing you their work.
Im loving to of found you, if your narratives are excellent. If you could also master the visual to be relevant. It would also assist peoples understanding being that you're pleasantly more advanced than the norm on here
This video is completely made by AI, likely with some human fact-checking and editing, but it's written by ChatGTP and narrated by AI voice and some kind of random AI visuals. It's not necessarily wrong, but it doesn't explain anything deeper than the most superficial points of the theory. PBS Spacetime has much better videos on the topic that make far more sense and have visuals that help you understand some of the abstract ideas presented by Roger Penrose.
Endless cycles of destruction and rebirth fail to do away with the paradox of time. It leads one to ask impossible questions about which cycle was the first one etc.
Roger Penrose explains that in another video, it’s not a paradox at all for photons without mass, photons don’t experience time. In the future of the universe photons will be the only things existing for a much longer period than the age of the current universe.
@@PazuzuDarkVoid but what about those of us who do experience time ? We cant just pretend it doesn't exist
I think there is only one cycle of the universe and this cycle at the end caused our current cycle to happen.
@@cherrydoctorpepper7 are you saying we have to live the same life over and over forever because that sounds like hell without real actualisation. All achievements become dust. Always
@@AlanSherry1 No. I think we start this cycle once from our perspective and we enter heaven after death. The universe is a closed loop, but we only experience it once. Heaven is a timeless state like the photon perspective.
This honestly makes way more sense than the big bang theory
Not that much. It’s just Einstein’s equations only bring us back to a millisecond after what we experienced (or call) the Big Bang. From that moment back to the initial singularity quantum physics come into play, but without having a quantum understanding of gravity we are speculating. It’s the two sides of the same coin. The two theories describe reality very well, yet they fundamentally contradict each other, that’s how we know one or both are wrong or not complete. Thus Stephen Hawking was working on the theory of everything.
Very nice info on a difficult theory.
This is not radical it’s just not European. Ancient Indians from India came up with this concept thousands of years ago. I’m a Buddhist and this is how Buddhist and perceives the beginning of life and the continuation of the universe.
Texts of monks vs. theories based on actual math and physics.
U reminded me of muslims “we have it in quran”
What you watch is not a religious documentary . Prince Siddhartha Gautama was not a mathematician or physicist
Buddhism does not even answer question to “how creation happened”
Buddhism is about your personal enlighenment , not bragging about your religious texts. Bragging about your own beliefs and undermining things that require serious work and knowledge
Will do no good for ur karma.
Arrogance and attempt to humiliate others will do bad for your karma.
Also there is buddhist cosmology with planes of existence how did you relate this one in video to religious planes of existence?
@@V_0_1_D i’m not gonna reply to you cause you don’t even use your real name. So I’m not going to reply to void.
@@judithwood6419
I do think there is rather a large gap between proposing narratives of how the universe may have originated and end , and offering a physics model, that may be correct. Yes this idea has some correspondence, being cyclic, with one of those narratives, but you have to remember Penrose's idea is speculative still , saying "well the Buddhist's knew" this will be quite an egg on face moment if a cyclic account is wrong. Penrose's idea is very radical in physics , he basically saying that the universe employs a mathematical trick to restart , he also suggests that certain particles (e.g. proton ) will decay into energy, but at this time we do not know that these particles can decay at all.
The theories and hypothesis of scientist are no different than the truths that many religions expound. I see the Buddhist point of view as another theory, which was not proven and nor did anyone try to. Science got started because of religions In search of God. There’s a famous quote that was said by Einstein which I can’t remember, I paraphrasing it something about trying to know the mind of God or something like that, it’s the same thing. I don’t care how many mathematical formulas (scientist (humans ))come up with I don’t think we will ever find out for sure.
Presbyterians call conformal invariance predestination.
Analogy does not suffice no matter how may differnt ways it is expressed.
Oh please.... Penrose's theories do not in any way shape or form "destroy" the big bang theory. This is just more CZcams click-bait.
yeah but the big bang,is far from being understood 100% of the actual events and what was actually "goings on" (Bernie Mack voice) during those initial moments as it came into being.
@@romainbourque Absolutely true; we have more to understand. But the title implies the whole idea has been "destroyed". Indeed, when you look around CZcams there are a very large number of videos claiming that recent evidence "disproves" the Big Bang theory, when in fact virtually no one in the scientific community is saying this.
I think he means in the sense Penrose's idea conflicts at least with the pop-science view that the BB theory describes a necessary beginning.
Also all titles that are a question always have no as the answer.
@@tdsdave Science works in that way that news dicoveries are updated, but BB explains only how matter got into extistance it always been said in this way, so moslty stupid religoius people try to fit into many gaps his fairy tale god
@@evanns1234567
No need to tell me about it .
Puberty sure hit this channel’s narrator hard didn’t it? 😂
Eternity HAS NO BOUNDARIES
Yes how did he ? it's a question for me too
But were did it all come from? Originally?
my theory is , imagine a 5d dimension when the past present and future are happening simultaneously , so even you future self is affecting you present and past self. for this dimension you will see the universe as a glowing orb when bigbang and big crunch are happening at the same moment even smaller than a planck time. so our universe is always present.
@@philipkashouh1816Yes. I would say there is one cycle of the universe and our cycle at the end caused this current cycle to start.
Nowhere. Because we have a beginning and an end, it's hard for us to grasp infinity and eternity.
@@gmork1090 bloody impossible I would say!
Oh so the Universe reincarnates over and over again. Why not?
The theory still has a hole, that being dark energy and still having the need for a big bang. Meaning that it still can't answer how galaxies form so quickly very early into big bangs, besides not being able to predict anything besides the CMB. The CMB is not proof that there was a big bang either, other models have also predicted a CMB. The big bang model has failed miserably to predict other observations and experiments, so it's not reliable.
The CCC model can work perfectly without the need of dark energy or a big bang by the way, he doesn't believe that there was a "bang", but he believes that the universe was extremely hot at one point, it reaches scifi levels the closer you get to the big bang.
Eon is 1000 years. (Your calling it an Eon.)
Penrose' calls these 'universe lifetimes' Aon(s).
The JWST actually proved it.
Proved what? A theory made up people? You do realize people made up everything people believe?
Nope. This is still not the way it happened. The creation process is tied in with multiple dimensions and there are many (maybe infinite universes).
Roger Penrose isn't destroying the Big Bang theory rather he seems to repackage the Big Bang theory in a new bottle with the concept of a singular cyclic universe via taking Hawkings Radiation as the cue where time Time and Space ceases to exists and radiates out God knows where but as Hawkins Radiation and eventually giving birth to a new universe. Very funny....
Quantum physics is just weird like that.
This is the same as the Buddhist understanding of the Kalachakra wheel of time 🛞 Buddhism ☸️🕉️🪷
Not even remotely 😂 stop with that religious nonsense 😅
@@PazuzuDarkVoid yes it is the same it must just frustrated atheistic Nhileistic materialist that philosophers had it right before them.
@@Jesst7721 Yep! Gotta love how every internet nihilist atheist also happens to be a complete douche. They can't just say something without adding superiority and snark.
The creation of the First Universe which likely took place about 100 billion years ago (earth time) is presented in this study.
Each of the seven Universes that are currently in existence originated from a single entity or unit of creation (singularity) which when clove asunder resulted in the formation of the Universes.
Except for the First Universe, the single entity or unit of creation of the successive second to seventh Universes all originated from the collapse or end of the previous Universes, after the Big Blast. The question that begs to be answered is “How was the single entity for the formation of the First Universe created since there was no Universe to collapse before that?”
The role of the All Mighty in the creation of the First Universe is clearly evident in the Al- Qur’an in the following Verse:
To Him is due the primal origin of the heavens and the earth: when He decrees a matter, He says to it: “Be,” and it is. (Surah 2: Al-Baqarah Verse 117).
While the question of Who created the Universe is abundantly clear, the question of How the First Universe was physically created is still unknown, which as a result requires some interpretation and postulations.
The Verse that guides this interpretation is given below:
Allah is the Light of the heavens and the earth. (Surah 24: Al-Nur Verse 35).
Based on this sentence, the following postulations are made:
The environment or space which is infinite in dimension and age before the creation of the First Universe is dark (without light). This space environment called Dark Space is not void or empty but is postulated to contain dark energy and dark matter. It is further postulated that the Dark Space is also populated with numerous bells of a trumpet like objects (black holes) of different sizes, which could range from stellar, super massive to even stupendously large ones. One of these could, after a Big Blast, result in the creation of the single entity or unit of creation, which then acts as the seed for the creation of the First Universe.
As shown from the above, it is quite clear that the creation of the First Universe or for that matter other Universes that successively followed ALWAYS takes place in an environment of Dark Space, with its inherent dark energy, dark matter and numerous black holes of varying masses, including the supermassive ones.
Based on this reasoning, the following interpretations can be made:
a) The Universes after their creation can be expected to contain dark energy, dark matter and black holes originating from Dark Space AND light (normal) matter, formed as a result after the single entity or unit of creation was clove asunder (Big Bang).
b) The black holes which originate from dark space play an important role in the development of galaxies of the Universe, acting as traps or focus of attraction for the light (normal) matter created after the Big Bang.
c) Galaxies with super massive black holes or larger masses at their centers can be expected to be formed in the early stages of the creation of the Universe after the Big Bang.
Do you need me to point out all of the logical fallacies here or can I just leave you to realize that there are at least three. The most fun named of which is called the Texas Sharpshooter fallacy.
The Universe as Revealed in the Al-Qur’an
Revised Summary
The findings of a study of the Universe, based on the Al-Qur’an which was revealed to Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) by inspiration about 1400 years ago, are presented in this paper.
The present Universe, with planet Earth and its beautiful stars and galaxies, is the Seventh Universe created by Allah, The Most Mighty and Full of Knowledge. The creation originated from a single entity (single unit of creation) which was clove asunder (Big Bang) six Days (13.63 billion years) ago in a dark space environment (containing dark energy, dark matter and black holes); with Earth being formed in the last two Days of the six Days period of creation. The resulting flat and thin Universe is expanding and spreading, resulting in the vastness of space.
Like Man, the present Universe has a term appointed and will very soon come to an end (estimated to be in about 2.5 million years). The end of the Universe, due to a Big Blast from a blackhole, will give rise to a new single unit of creation - which then acts as the seed of creation for a new universe. The creation of the present universe, as well as past and future universes, thus started as a Big Bang and will end later in time as a Big Blast (from black hole).
The single entity or unit of creation, responsible for the creation of the present Seventh Universe, originated from the partial collapse (end) of the Sixth Universe back in time. The creation of this Sixth Universe likewise had its origin from a single entity formed from the collapse (end) of the Fifth Universe. This series of previous creation and ending to form single entities (units of creation) in the formation of the Universes were responsible for the Fourth, Third, Second and First Universe; the latter (First) being the oldest Universe. The origin of the First Universe is also discussed. Each of the previous Universes also had its own planet Earth (with Man); now however gone due to the previous Big Blasts.
The present Seventh Universe is not the last of the Universes. Very soon a new Universe (the Eight Universe) will be created from the single entity or unit of creation produced after the end of the present Seventh Universe. Like the Universe created earlier, the Eight Universe will also have its own planet Earth. This series of ending and creation will be repeated over and over (cyclic in nature) resulting in more Universes in the future, unless the All Mighty decides otherwise.
Evidence in the form of Verses quoted from the Al-Qur’an will be presented to show the existence of the previous Universes, as well as the creation of the present and future Universes.
Have you not heard , Quranic scientific miracles have been debunked Ali Dawah says so. There is nothing scientific in the Quran.