@@wealthy4658 no shit the 1997 is better it had CGI, It had modern technology, and the ship was easier to construct, the 1958 was impressive for it's time
This movie was surprisingly realistic especially the ice shearing off and landing on the deck just like the new Titanic movie. I have no doubt Cameron watched this movie and took much from it.
They had to draw the fire as the boiler rooms were filling with seawater. Edit: They had to draw the fire so they could vent the extra steam out the smokestacks.
Bernard Fox plays Frederick Fleet (the lookout who says “Iceberg dead ahead”) in this movie. In James Cameron’s Titanic, he plays Col. Archibald Gracie.
The fact that this all happened in the middle of the night is haunting I can't imagine myself sleeping and all of a sudden I hear people screaming for their life
This is considered by many to be the most accurate overall depiction of the Titanic’s journey. Survivors of the disaster were actually on set part of the time serving as technical advisers.
I know it’s not as dramatic as the James Cameron movie, which is also extremely good, but I’d imagine this is more realistic to how the crew would have responded.
@@GamePlayerZ1912 "No Drama" I believe the crew was quite calm. Most knew that "unsinkable" was just a jingoistic magazine article. However, with watertight compartments and other features, Titanic was quite safe. On the Bridge they believed they had barely grazed it. While assessing the damage, it took about an hour to realize Titanic was going to sink. For all the Officers and most of the Crew there was no panic. At first none thought it would sink, but they would have a lot to do to "limp" into port; or be towed. Once they realized Titanic would sink, they were too busy! Titanic sank remarkably quickly! The long gash along the side resulted in too many compartments filling rather quickly. For quite a while they thought she would last until well after daylight.
@@paladinsix9285 it wasn't a long gash, it was six small slits according to an analysis of the wreck. Also, I'm not saying they would be panicking exactly like the 1997 movie, but I doubt they would be completely calm, humans are not like that.
@@GamePlayerZ1912 Also, Harland and Wolff suggested it might’ve been much smaller damage, but giant gash sounded more dramatic, so media ran with it. Some things never change.
Black box recording of airline pilots show they calm in a situaion. Panic leads to indecision ,so in this situation where you need make a simple manove,which most ships would just make, you run round flapping.
I still prefer James Cameron's version. The fiction added a sense of heart, and soul, and allowed you to connect with characters that audiences could relate to on an emotional personal level.
The iceberg looks more like the one that she actually hit. Theres a picture of an iceberg like the one in this movie with supposed red and black paint on it thats supposed to be the one that she hit. Idk if it's true though...
@@geoffg8840 actually, no. The most likely iceberg the ship hit is one photographed by Stephen Rehorek, it matches survivor accounts and has some signs of having collided with something. Besides, there is no way they could've seen any paint, the ship hit the berg in the underwater part.
It makes you wonder which was more realistic. Yes the ship was taking on water but many of the crew and passengers didn't realise how bad it was to start with. So it could be accurate that it is shown as being quite calm.
@ENTERTAINING SPORTS HIGHLIGHTS I beg to differ, these are trained officers and sailors. They wouldn’t yell and scream and panic like a bunch of untrained civilians. It would be un-British of them.
@Konstantinos Nikolakakis the survivor accounts from filmed from the 1950s to the 1980s do all say that it was calm. Most were sleeping and those who felt it described it as a couple of bumps or a shudder. I think the most dramatic I heard was someone saying they felt a large vibration which ran down the length of the ship, and then back again. Now I couldn't say why such a thing would occur as I'm not a scientist. However, many accounts do state that panic did set in towards the end, but I think we all know that.
@@mikeh2006 The WORKERS who were putting the Coal in the Fire on the Bottom of the Ship, i seriously doubt they were "CALM" !!!. , They were there where the direct clash of the ICEBURG penetrated the ship, and the WATER was gushing inside the ship at an alarming rate ......... And i dont believe the Men who first seen the ICEBURG , then seen it get closer and closer to the collision were CALM either . They were SCARED SHITLESS, and which ever people were on top of the ship who seen the collision were PANICKING as well
I suppose we'll never know for sure. It might have been like this, it might have been like James Cameron's version, it might have been something in-between.
@CRS They’re trained officers, men like that don’t panic when in danger because it tends to get them killed. They need to be cool and collected and make good decisions.
This is the first movie about the Titanic I remember seeing, and I was about 10-11 years old. I remember a scene where the guys in the boiler room were trying to get out before the watertight doors shut and the POV was from the outside of the door. You saw several get to safety, but then you saw the doors close on others trying to get out. The thought of the men behind those doors, struggling, even though you couldn't see them, still sticks with me.
I know what you mean, and yes people definitely probably died as a result, but don’t forget, in the right situation, people behind those doors could have still gone out, there were still ladders and ways in the roof of the compartment to climb up, you just had to hope you were able to do that before the water overwhelmed you
Watched this film again yesterday . I noticed that in this scene there's no music, the collision itself seems almost gentle and innocuous - aside from some water flooding into the engine room, also just some clenching teeth from the Officer on the Bridge. Interesting to compare it with the equivalent scene in Cameron's Titanic :-) .
Judging by all the testimony we have from both inquiries, the event of collision seems to be better represented it here than in Cameron‘s movie. To most people it seems like a couple of gentle bumps, unexpected ones but nothing as overly dramatic as is shown in 97.
They used a model from Harland And Wolffe for accuracy. This makes it the most accurate depiction of Titanic in a film, even more so than James Cameron's
@@Tamaldo There's some things James Cameron got right that this film didn't, like the splitting of the ship, and additionally there's some things James Cameron didn't stick true to by including the fictional characters of Jack and Rose. So each film has it's accurate, and inaccurate elements.
@@Tamaldonot really I noticed many small inaccuracies of the model they used in this movie. Such as the the windows of the prominent deck is a split window similar to the britannic. Honestly Cameron’s model is more accurate, he also uses original plans from H&W especially from Olympic’s plans
Outwardly calm. The clenched teeth of the Officer of the Deck/Watch Officer is a marvelous depiction of intense concern while maintaining a "stiff upper lip" "No Drama" mustn't panic the crew.
These way more organic and more real compared to 1997 Titanic. It's doesn't have any sound track during the hit and the way that people handle thing are just feel very very real...
1:55 the way the camera was zooming in with the two crew mates looking at the ice berg was shot really nice seems ahead of its time no doubt James Cameron definitely took some inspiration from this film
I don't care what anyone says, both this movie and the 1997 movie are good, it doesn't matter how they portrayed the actual event, what matters is they show the ship sinking and the 1500 people losing their lives that night, while the 1997 film actually shows the ship splitting in half.
At 1:07, you can really feel the cold and imagine how cold it must’ve been for the lookouts that night. The cold wind sounds coupled with the ice crystals you see on their jackets. None of that in the James Cameron film, just some visible breath
1997 version of this scene: Frederick Fleet: Bugger me! (rings the bell three times, then picks up a phone to warn the wheelhouse) PICK UP, YOU BASTARDS! (6th Officer Moody comes into the wheelhouse, notices the phone ringing and picks it up) Fleet: IS THERE ANYONE THERE?! Moody: Yes, what do you see? Fleet: ICEBERG, RIGHT AHEAD! Moody: Thank you. (hangs up, rushes to 1st Officer Murdock) Iceberg, right ahead! Murdoch and Moody: Hard to starboard!
Lookout Frederick Fleet portrayed in this movie by the late bernard fox also portrayed first class passenger and titanic survivor Colonel Archibald Gracie in the movie titanic (1997).
@@DANIELLE_BREANNA_LACY Yes... But the correct nautical term is 'dead ahead'. Realising your ship is seconds from ploughing into a mountain of ice however is a good reason for forgetting yourself.
Two things i noticed, that ive never heard about on titanic before are the two tubes murdoch speaks into on the bridge, and a nursey/playroom for children. Anybody know if those things existed on titanic for real? just curious. plus the I agree that the crew is calm and exepct for those on the bridge don't seem to take the situation to seriously, which of course is likely how they reacted back then.
Voice tubes were very common at the time. So it's possible the titanic had them. As for the playroom, it didn't have a dedicated playroom as shown, but an area. However, the original plans did show a playroom, however the final design didn't include it. Likely, the producers went off the original plans. Interestingly, Britannic was built with a dedicated play room. So yes, they got it wrong but certainly didn't mean to.
@@punkyagogo I wouldn't say hundreds of miles deep, maybe 100s of METRES below the surface with the deepest lying iceberg being 1080 metres below. Regardless i agree with you, a deceptively large mass. Nobody heeding the iceberg warnings have sunk since and there's probably a good reason for such an importance being placed on iceberg warnings. The Titanic showed the world what happens when you are complacent with communication and observation systems....
Before everyone says that it's so bad they don't panic when they see iceberg and say that 1997 is already more realistic then ahem, Hollywood drama effect :P
It’s pretty commonly held that it was actually, iceberg Deadhead, iceberg right ahead would be confusing in such a situation. Because giving an order like that in an emergency situation could so easily confuse the people taking action, because does the right mean right, or is right being used interchangeably with straight ahead.
Seriously impressive for the time, considering there's no cgi available
The most expensive film in British history
Titanic 1997 is better
The real titanic is better built than the 1958 movie
@@wealthy4658 no shit the 1997 is better it had CGI, It had modern technology, and the ship was easier to construct, the 1958 was impressive for it's time
Partly why the the movies from the 40’s to the 80’s
This movie was surprisingly realistic especially the ice shearing off and landing on the deck just like the new Titanic movie. I have no doubt Cameron watched this movie and took much from it.
He did. So many scenes are quite similar, but still his movie is great.
Yes, he isn't shy about admitting it either.
@@Tgogators he's stolen plenty from others
Yeah, but Cameron improved the scenario!
The model of the ship is done well... can you tell me how the hell my brain knows it's a smaller scale model?
Sometimes it’s Hard to believe but it’s been 108 years since everything that you see In this video happened in real life.
Scary and sad. RIP
Actually, 108 years ago, turning the wheel "hard to starboard" turned the ship to port, to the left.
yep
They had to draw the fire as the boiler rooms were filling with seawater. Edit: They had to draw the fire so they could vent the extra steam out the smokestacks.
It’s hard to believe that it was real....
109 now :(
Bernard Fox plays Frederick Fleet (the lookout who says “Iceberg dead ahead”) in this movie. In James Cameron’s Titanic, he plays Col. Archibald Gracie.
I know. It’s cool
Well k, but that's already straight fax tho
hes dead... that's sad
And Chairman Mouse in The Rescuers and the pilot in The Mummy.
Excellent bit of movie trivia, that! I had no idea.
The fact that this all happened in the middle of the night is haunting I can't imagine myself sleeping and all of a sudden I hear people screaming for their life
You would have felt a tremble it wouldn’t start Immediately it was a building panic
The bow would have been submerged before any real panic I'd think.
This is considered by many to be the most accurate overall depiction of the Titanic’s journey. Survivors of the disaster were actually on set part of the time serving as technical advisers.
So youre telling me they were really this CALM during the ICE BERG collision ??
@@entertainingsportshighligh7525 They thought they missed the iceberg.
@@entertainingsportshighligh7525they didn't even know that the damage will make the ship sink
@@entertainingsportshighligh7525yes they were
@@jimmykray9583 i dont believe it
I know it’s not as dramatic as the James Cameron movie, which is also extremely good, but I’d imagine this is more realistic to how the crew would have responded.
Tbh I doubt they would be that calm with an iceberg right ahead the ship and less than a mile away from it.
@@GamePlayerZ1912 "No Drama"
I believe the crew was quite calm. Most knew that "unsinkable" was just a jingoistic magazine article. However, with watertight compartments and other features, Titanic was quite safe.
On the Bridge they believed they had barely grazed it. While assessing the damage, it took about an hour to realize Titanic was going to sink.
For all the Officers and most of the Crew there was no panic. At first none thought it would sink, but they would have a lot to do to "limp" into port; or be towed.
Once they realized Titanic would sink, they were too busy!
Titanic sank remarkably quickly! The long gash along the side resulted in too many compartments filling rather quickly. For quite a while they thought she would last until well after daylight.
@@paladinsix9285 it wasn't a long gash, it was six small slits according to an analysis of the wreck.
Also, I'm not saying they would be panicking exactly like the 1997 movie, but I doubt they would be completely calm, humans are not like that.
@@GamePlayerZ1912 Also, Harland and Wolff suggested it might’ve been much smaller damage, but giant gash sounded more dramatic, so media ran with it. Some things never change.
Black box recording of airline pilots show they calm in a situaion. Panic leads to indecision ,so in this situation where you need make a simple manove,which most ships would just make, you run round flapping.
Interestingly, A Night to Remember outscores Titanic on both IMDB and Rotten Tomatoes.
as it should.
@@DerpyPossum ANTR is accurate than that 1997 fictional character
It’s a far better film and much more moving if less visually spectacular
@@Thinladiun For SFX available at the time, I'd say it is equally spectacular, if little less coherent in that regard.
I still prefer James Cameron's version. The fiction added a sense of heart, and soul, and allowed you to connect with characters that audiences could relate to on an emotional personal level.
You know i this is a more realistic depiction. No music, no screaming and running around. Yet from a viewers perspective it seems a bit dull.
Well I mean it's no *I AMMMM THE SENATE* Scene
I like the other one. But this one is more accurate
then go watch the false depection of it? lol idk what to tell you.
The iceberg looks more like the one that she actually hit. Theres a picture of an iceberg like the one in this movie with supposed red and black paint on it thats supposed to be the one that she hit. Idk if it's true though...
@@geoffg8840 actually, no. The most likely iceberg the ship hit is one photographed by Stephen Rehorek, it matches survivor accounts and has some signs of having collided with something.
Besides, there is no way they could've seen any paint, the ship hit the berg in the underwater part.
I actually really like how calm this is. At this point of the audience know just how much danger they're in
i dont . I like how extremely SCARED & PANICED they were in the 1997 Film.
Way more realistic
It makes you wonder which was more realistic. Yes the ship was taking on water but many of the crew and passengers didn't realise how bad it was to start with. So it could be accurate that it is shown as being quite calm.
@ENTERTAINING SPORTS HIGHLIGHTS I beg to differ, these are trained officers and sailors. They wouldn’t yell and scream and panic like a bunch of untrained civilians. It would be un-British of them.
@Konstantinos Nikolakakis the survivor accounts from filmed from the 1950s to the 1980s do all say that it was calm. Most were sleeping and those who felt it described it as a couple of bumps or a shudder. I think the most dramatic I heard was someone saying they felt a large vibration which ran down the length of the ship, and then back again. Now I couldn't say why such a thing would occur as I'm not a scientist. However, many accounts do state that panic did set in towards the end, but I think we all know that.
@@mikeh2006 The WORKERS who were putting the Coal in the Fire on the Bottom of the Ship, i seriously doubt they were "CALM" !!!. , They were there where the direct clash of the ICEBURG penetrated the ship, and the WATER was gushing inside the ship at an alarming rate ......... And i dont believe the Men who first seen the ICEBURG , then seen it get closer and closer to the collision were CALM either . They were SCARED SHITLESS, and which ever people were on top of the ship who seen the collision were PANICKING as well
James Cameron's Titanic added a lot of music and drama to this moment. In reality, the event itself was probably just like this..
I suppose we'll never know for sure. It might have been like this, it might have been like James Cameron's version, it might have been something in-between.
@CRS They’re trained officers, men like that don’t panic when in danger because it tends to get them killed. They need to be cool and collected and make good decisions.
This is the first movie about the Titanic I remember seeing, and I was about 10-11 years old. I remember a scene where the guys in the boiler room were trying to get out before the watertight doors shut and the POV was from the outside of the door. You saw several get to safety, but then you saw the doors close on others trying to get out. The thought of the men behind those doors, struggling, even though you couldn't see them, still sticks with me.
I believe they still could have climbed above the bulkheads
Yea they had ladders
I know what you mean, and yes people definitely probably died as a result, but don’t forget, in the right situation, people behind those doors could have still gone out, there were still ladders and ways in the roof of the compartment to climb up, you just had to hope you were able to do that before the water overwhelmed you
1. There were ladders that lead to Scotland road
2. The doors could still be opened. Which is also why nobody died right after the collision.
I like how there is no music in this scene, giving it more suspense
Watched this film again yesterday . I noticed that in this scene there's no music, the collision itself seems almost gentle and innocuous - aside from some water flooding into the engine room, also just some clenching teeth from the Officer on the Bridge. Interesting to compare it with the equivalent scene in Cameron's Titanic :-) .
Cameron did it much better, but I think there were no such technologies, like in 1997 when Cameron made his movie
Yes, we'll never know what Murdoch was thinking when the ship hit the iceberg but probably the most terrible feeling in the world.
I think its to give the sense of false secutity
Judging by all the testimony we have from both inquiries, the event of collision seems to be better represented it here than in Cameron‘s movie. To most people it seems like a couple of gentle bumps, unexpected ones but nothing as overly dramatic as is shown in 97.
@@S.O.V.A4838 Das ist Kesselraum 6 nicht der Maschienenraum der ist weiter hinten im Schiff
this model looks amazing for its time
They used a model from Harland And Wolffe for accuracy. This makes it the most accurate depiction of Titanic in a film, even more so than James Cameron's
@@Tamaldo There's some things James Cameron got right that this film didn't, like the splitting of the ship, and additionally there's some things James Cameron didn't stick true to by including the fictional characters of Jack and Rose. So each film has it's accurate, and inaccurate elements.
@CRS the accounts of splitting were varied. It was in 1985 that the wreck was found and the split was of course verified
@@Tamaldonot really I noticed many small inaccuracies of the model they used in this movie. Such as the the windows of the prominent deck is a split window similar to the britannic. Honestly Cameron’s model is more accurate, he also uses original plans from H&W especially from Olympic’s plans
3:55 that's got to be the worst birthday present for him
The very subtle trembling of the wine glasses in the dining room gave me chills... What a film!
It was the zoom in on the rocking horse that got me. It was the film's way of saying "this ship is about to be rocked".
I Love How The Men On The Bridge Were Calm As If Nothing Was Going On.
I liked your comment!
Outwardly calm. The clenched teeth of the Officer of the Deck/Watch Officer is a marvelous depiction of intense concern while maintaining a "stiff upper lip"
"No Drama" mustn't panic the crew.
Cause no one believed that Titanic would sink.
Honestly, I'd expect a professional crew to remain calm.
These way more organic and more real compared to 1997 Titanic.
It's doesn't have any sound track during the hit and the way that people handle thing are just feel very very real...
„It’s my birthday today as well!” 😂
Happened on my birthday as well.
Happy Birthday to late 😂🎂
Nice
Me reading 10 moths later happy birhtday
Hi
I saw an interesting documentary. It suggested that if they had hit that iceberg head on Titanic would have sustained damage but stayed afloat.
But then without knowing how big the iceberg was underneath would the ship have ran aground?
1:55 the way the camera was zooming in with the two crew mates looking at the ice berg was shot really nice seems ahead of its time no doubt James Cameron definitely took some inspiration from this film
That's a dolly shot, to be precise. And indeed James Cameron did take inspiration from this film.
such a classic moovie !!!
you know you did a good job when you know the ship will hit the iceberg yet it is still suspenseful
I don't care what anyone says, both this movie and the 1997 movie are good, it doesn't matter how they portrayed the actual event, what matters is they show the ship sinking and the 1500 people losing their lives that night, while the 1997 film actually shows the ship splitting in half.
While this movie shows the Carpathia picking up the Titanic’s distress call and dashing to her rescue.
At 1:07, you can really feel the cold and imagine how cold it must’ve been for the lookouts that night. The cold wind sounds coupled with the ice crystals you see on their jackets. None of that in the James Cameron film, just some visible breath
It feels calming and no screaming and no running
1:09 the iconic scene
2:04
My face when I see my test results
Really well done for 1958
1:15 ICEBERG DEAD AHEAD SIR!
I love how the crew of the titanic in this film are generally calm when they are about collide with the iceberg
This was a great movie
2:17 wen you look at the Clock and u are 3 hours late for school and u run so fast that u fall down
Wow awesome for 1958!
1:22 Hard a starboard
"Hard a starboard it is, sir."
1:09 BING BONG BLING!!!
at 0:58 that is actually a room not included on Titanic but added to Britannic - The nursery/playroom
The lookout who spotted the iceberg was played by Bernard Fox, who later appeared in the James Cameron film, but portrayed Colonel Archibald Gracie.
Great movie.
A great movie. I much prefer it to the 1997 remake. That little boy Honor Blackman gives the drink to is so incredibly cute!
Uh...has anyone taken a look at the doll at 0:39
Oh my god I would not sleep with that thing
Creepy af!
I think he need to repair his eyes lol
It's called a "golliwog doll" and they were very popular for children in the UK at the turn of the century.
Where is it?
“iceberg dead ahead sir” that makes me feel like oh no its an iceberg
Or how about "Torpedo closing on the starboard bow" which would make someone feel like oh no a torpedo
makes sense lol
This is like a 2008 Remake. Lol
captén 😂
John f Kennedy how would u know you died in the 60’s
@@74836 or did he
Wdym
2:18 Chunks fall onto the bow deck, striking and slipping a man.
You know there are a lot more calm than the 1997 version
1997 version of this scene:
Frederick Fleet: Bugger me! (rings the bell three times, then picks up a phone to warn the wheelhouse) PICK UP, YOU BASTARDS!
(6th Officer Moody comes into the wheelhouse, notices the phone ringing and picks it up)
Fleet: IS THERE ANYONE THERE?!
Moody: Yes, what do you see?
Fleet: ICEBERG, RIGHT AHEAD!
Moody: Thank you. (hangs up, rushes to 1st Officer Murdock) Iceberg, right ahead!
Murdoch and Moody: Hard to starboard!
Lookout Frederick Fleet portrayed in this movie by the late bernard fox also portrayed first class passenger and titanic survivor Colonel Archibald Gracie in the movie titanic (1997).
The correct 37 seconds from sighting until strike.
1:05 is the time the ship hit the iceberg
Thank you!!
You mean 1:06
is Actually 2:13
I meant the time the ship saw the berg
this is a good movie
The fact that they actually included it catching fire.
what do you mean?
Coal fire theory is false, please stop with the misinformation.
@@GamePlayerZ1912 sorry, the timing was not correct. The second funnel exploded, not the fireboxes.
They so calm
3:33 Majestic? Wasn't she launched in 1913?
He’s referring to the first ‘Majestic’, which entered service in 1889.
@@DerpyPossum Oh, I see. I didn't realise there was another one. Thanks for clarifying. 😊
It’s been 110 years tonight
i like how small the model is
the main part is at 1:06
I wonder why they changed Fleet’s line to “Iceberg DEAD ahead”.
Cameron’s transcript
“- Iceberg, right ahead!
- Thank you!”
is actually accurate.
Probably because 'right ahead' is incorrect terminology, even if it is what was said.
“Iceberg, right ahead!” is what he really said in reality.
@@DomWeasel Screw that. Everyone on the Titanic knew what he meant by “right ahead”.
@@DANIELLE_BREANNA_LACY
Yes... But the correct nautical term is 'dead ahead'.
Realising your ship is seconds from ploughing into a mountain of ice however is a good reason for forgetting yourself.
with that change he said is really different from this movie XD
2:03 are you ok?
He’s terrified
“You’re good you’re good you’re good!”
This is the definitive Titanic movie
The guy who played Ismay here looks just like the one in the 1997 film. And Captain Smith also.
Now that's attention to detail, having water coming out of the coal bunker.
They were so calmer in the bridge when they saw the iceberg compared to James Cameron’s
😂
The binoculars had been left behind, and I doubt if any of the crew ever had an eye exam.
Oh so that's where those closing doors led too 😅
2:18
where is leonado de kopi o and kek wingslet?
How did they do the collision? It’s amazing
They used a matte, kind of like a green screen today.
Amasing
Titanic II is set to sail in 2022
nope is gonna be in 2024 i think
@@bacongoose8820 Thanks for letting me know.
1:14 Iceberg, dead ahead sir!
Crow’s Nest spots iceberg 1:06
Ismays bed looks amazing
Why does the steering wheel guy look like he should be in a studio
1:06 just found out lookout 👀 is the same actor who play Archie in the 1997 James Cameron titanic 🚢
Two things i noticed, that ive never heard about on titanic before are the two tubes murdoch speaks into on the bridge, and a nursey/playroom for children. Anybody know if those things existed on titanic for real? just curious. plus the I agree that the crew is calm and exepct for those on the bridge don't seem to take the situation to seriously, which of course is likely how they reacted back then.
Voice tubes were very common at the time. So it's possible the titanic had them.
As for the playroom, it didn't have a dedicated playroom as shown, but an area. However, the original plans did show a playroom, however the final design didn't include it. Likely, the producers went off the original plans.
Interestingly, Britannic was built with a dedicated play room.
So yes, they got it wrong but certainly didn't mean to.
@@mikeh2006 Thank you!
The left lookout really as same as original frederick fleet
1.28 wow where you got that suit in 1912?
1:28 right?
I wonder if the part where they crew spot the iceberg and how they react to it is more realistic on the 1958 or on 1997?? What do you think ?
The iceberg dint look like an iceberg its like a rock....
Piece of foam 😂
bruh in real life was like tat.
That's what makes icebergs so dangerous. They just barely peak above the surface of the water, yet are hundreds of miles deep.
Have you ever heard the saying, "Only the tip of the iceberg"
@@punkyagogo I wouldn't say hundreds of miles deep, maybe 100s of METRES below the surface with the deepest lying iceberg being 1080 metres below. Regardless i agree with you, a deceptively large mass. Nobody heeding the iceberg warnings have sunk since and there's probably a good reason for such an importance being placed on iceberg warnings. The Titanic showed the world what happens when you are complacent with communication and observation systems....
Before everyone says that it's so bad they don't panic when they see iceberg and say that 1997 is already more realistic then ahem, Hollywood drama effect :P
2:57 The engine stop wasn't ordered by Murdoch but by Smith but Smith doesn't even reply.....
“It’s my birthday today aswell!”
A time to remember:iceberg dead a head sir.Titanic:ICEBERG RIGHT AHEAD!!!!
Lusitania: TORPEDO CLOSING ON THE STARBOARD BOW!!!!
2:14 Furniture vibrates due to the strike.
Someone needs to tell that guy at 3:11 that a lump of ice ain't gonna make a very good souvenir.
"It's my birthday today aswell!"
The stoker looks exactly like Arthur John Priest.
3:13
What do you think of this for a souvenir
2:18 I feel like this shot was reused in some movies.
Im watching this right now......
Bruh they are so calm went they are gonna crash a iceberg like “oh look a iceberg”
the moment when watertight door closed the men not run away full panic. the cameron film engine and firemen run away full panic.
More realistic in terms of the reactions of the crew.
2:18 this is the part that i laughed
Also I think that part was reused in some other titanic movies
1:08 iceberg dead ahead sir!!!
Why they said:
"ICEBERG GET AHEAD"
Or
"ICEBERG DEAD AHEAD"
Because there was an iceberg right infront of them so they most often said, "iceberg dead ahead!"
Fleet in real life actually said "Iceberg, right ahead!" instead of "Iceberg, dead ahead!"
In 1997 they say: Iceberg right ahead!
And in 1958 they say:Iceberg dead ahead!
It’s pretty commonly held that it was actually, iceberg Deadhead, iceberg right ahead would be confusing in such a situation. Because giving an order like that in an emergency situation could so easily confuse the people taking action, because does the right mean right, or is right being used interchangeably with straight ahead.
@@conors4430 yet Fleet said in a interview he said "Iceberg, right ahead!"