Smartphones Will NOT Be Replaced.
Vložit
- čas přidán 15. 06. 2024
- 0:00 Skit
1:09 Commentary
● Tailosive Tech Plus: czcams.com/users/tailosivetech...
● Podcast: / tailosivepodcasts
● Contact: x.com/tailosivetech
Intro chime by: / randyvazquez - Věda a technologie
Wouldn't it be a lot cheaper and more convenient for a family to watch TV together on one device rather than everyone needing to get a headset just to see a movie.
Absolutely. Unless the family is in multiple locations. Then you'll be able to sit down alone on the couch and be able to look over at the personas of your family members as they enjoy movie night with you. You'll even be able to talk over the movies and explain the parts your loved one's just don't get.
And if this takes off, everyone will have one of these already. They won't buy them for movie night, or for any one thing that's not worth the $1500 that these things cost. They will buy them for the whole experience. Or they'll buy the Samsung version. Or the Meta Quest 5.
Things moves fast this days. As u said, if it replaces TV means cheaper to get vision pro for the whole family. Just like this days everyone has a phone 30 years ago we use one phone the whole house. You can patent a helmet that can attach to vision pro and hepa filter. Another pandemic will make that useful
That’s not gonna happen dudes!
4k smart TV's start at $300. 10 people can watch it.
Yet all those 10 people have a $1000 Iphone.
If only there was some magical device that allowed this
No way haha, I just finished watching Jon Prossers new video on FPT “the beginning of the end of iPhone” let’s see 😂 I love your content and skits by the way!!
Remember when Prosser said Apple was developing a Steve Jobs edition of the smart glasses? 😂 wonder where he got that intel
Same here! Ultimately I think they’re toying with the idea of replacing it right now, but they don’t have the idea set in stone by any means. And there’s a good chance people will get upset if Apple tries to phase out the iPhone… like me, I would NOT like that 😂
@@albertojhernandezthat hasn’t been proven false. Though I don’t think it’s likely
Yea was about to say that! Literally responding to FPT
@@chidorirasenganz even if it is right it would be a decade or more before it became a real product meaning there’s no way Apple would have plans for that let alone for them to get leaked
When my grandpa was a young adult scientists were bragging about a supercomputer that could get down to the size of a Volkswagen beetle one day. Now I have a more powerful computer on my wrist. To say we won't advance past phones in our lifetime feels like quite a claim. Our grandparents couldn't imagine how advanced technology would get.
The problem is back then we were at the beginning when progress is easier. The last 20% is the challenge.
Gonna come back to this video in 10 years and just laugh
Came here to say that
You can watch the video on your 3D TV.
You very well might be right. Jon Prosser just released a video called “The Beginning of the End for the iPhone” and while I agree with the overall idea of his video, ultimately I don’t think it will happen in my lifetime (just a bit after college till… I’m dead I guess lol). What’s more, I don’t WANT them to phase out the iPhone. It’s an excellent product and I don’t see this technology being enough to replace it in every way for years and years.
Extreme lack of imagination. The smartphone didn't even exist when you were born and assuming that will be the form factor for the rest of your life... wow.
I agree with you. I don't think that Apple Vision pro could replace smartphones because not only would it be impractical to wear it around all day, but also anyone would look tacky in public with it on. I think this is just a luxury item for those who have enough to drop several bands on whatever they please, which is definitely not me, but I'd love to try it out one day
I don't agree that it's a luxury item - it has some genuine value as a tool, or at least VR headsets as a whole do.
But it's a specialized tool. It does some things better than a phone, tablet, laptop, desktop, or gaming console can do, making it fit nicely into some people's work or personal lives (ignoring the price tag, anyway), but it doesn't do all the things you'd want those other devices for, so it's not going to outright replace any of them. It may replace tablets in one person's workflow, but another person really needs a tablet to do their graphic design work. It may replace a laptop in one person's workflow, but another really needs a physical keyboard for their excel spreadsheets, or a physical screen for showing work to coworkers, or a specific program that doesn't exist on the Vision Pro.
Me personally, I use my VR headset for gaming a few dozen times a year when the mood strikes, or for exercise if I don't have the opportunity to do anything physical outside of home for long periods. I could live without it, and I would never spend 4 figures on getting a better model. But for other people, what VR headsets offer is just plain useful.
it's not about replacing the phone - it's about creating new spatial experiences. I was fixing my car and my stupid phone can't do anything - I have to watch a CZcams video and try to follow along how to fix it. AI should make it so if I wear a Vision Pro - it should see what I am seeing and if I ask it what I want to fix and I am looking at the hood of my car - it should be able to understand and guide me with arrows on the stuff itself. There is so much to this platform and AI. Among other things. The Phone can't do these things. But the phone does things that these glasses can't do. Gotta have both to improve our lives.
There isn't one thing the phone can do that the Vision Pro isn't capable of- not one. I wonder why you thought that. I do like the mechanic's helper idea you had.
There’s a gadget called Microsoft HoloLens-it’s reaching 7 this year, and the Vision Pro was the same tech but adding Apple Silicon and Vision OS into it, without that much of an emphasis on professional use. I don’t see workplaces using the HoloLens that often, tho
Making calls.@@DrNoThanks
I have a hard time believing that I'm going to ever see anyone in public with one of these things. Maybe like at an airport or on a plane, but I think the likelihood of seeing someone just walking around on the street wearing one is going to be pretty close to zero. I'm trying to picture someone wearing one to like a pub/bar, I just don't see it happening without them being relentlessly mocked by their friends.
They will get smaller. Meta sells an AR device that looks just like regular sunglasses.
@@dtz1000 But it is a long way before it happend
this video should have fineshed at the skit. that was so good, and told the whole story in the title. good representation bro
i dont think it will replace the smartphone but it has the ability to radically change how we interact with our tech. like when the iphone came out it never replaced computers thought it is for many the computer they use most. also with like selfies. before the front camera and social media apps existed no one would have imagined that it became such a big thing. maybe we just cant even imagene yet how and what it will change yet. also what new ways of interacting and sharing will come from this technologie.
I doubt companies should focus on VR headset that tries to replace a phone or computer. It will just result in a bulky, expensive headset like the Vision Pro. I believe as smartphone tech is not compact enough to put into glasses, they should instead make them complementary to smartphones. Imagine a thin and light AR glasses with a simple camera and battery that is tethered to the iPhone to process. This will be wireless so the iPhone is running invisibly and with a transparent OLED to save on cost and battery life. This can be priced at $500 and can be developed with 2024 tech with decent battery as it doesn’t operate by itself.
This can have VR and AR features like experiencing real scenes and activate real world electronics. As this from factor goes on, they can slowly add things like proper processor and better components, the smartphone will be slowly became a supplementary device with things like camera and battery from a main device.
I think the impact of ease-of-use may be overlooked here. If Apple pulls off the interaction properly, the jump in ease-of-use will be something like that of switching from using a keyboard only to navigate and operate a computer to using both a keyboard and mouse, or from mouse to touch, but I think it will be bigger --again keyboard --> mouse. When most of your tech can be connected to a device like this and you can operate your devices and apps with gestures and commands that require only a small fraction of the effort when compared to the last control paradigm we may find ourselves adopting devices like these much faster than this video suggests.
Exactly
I have one, and the ease of use is next level. There are always a few hiccups, but overall, it is a breeze to use, and it often feels like it's reading my mind with the eye tracking.
👀
Every Apple product is an accessory to the iPhone. There are very few people who use Apple products but don’t have an iPhone. Mac users have iPhones, iPad users have iPhones, Apple Watch users have iPhones. The Vision Pro is an iPhone accessory
I disagree the Vision Pro is a standalone device - it’s not an iPhone accessory - if anything, the iPhone is a Vision Pro’s accessory but I do agree it’s going to be a long time before they ditch the iPhone and everyone will be wearing Vision Pros (if this even happens) who knows what the future will bring
Nah missed chance to plug in Tim's "wow" in the beginning 😅
I was literally thinking the exact same thing 😂😂
Do you think you are going to keep the Vision Pro or return it/sell it?
Apple Watch has already replaced my smartphone. Sold my iPhone 1 year ago and have been rocking Apple Watch Ultra exclusively ever since!
Does airdrop/airplay not work fast on the Vision Pro? Sharing memes and pictures like in your examples should be simple
All I see is a big hassle when trying to share files.
I think it's kinda funny - some people are saying VR is doomed, some people are saying it's "the future", and very few people seem to think it's a possibility that it's a separate piece of technology from anything else with inherent strengths and weaknesses, which will slot nicely into some people's workflows or free time but not into others', like a desktop, laptop, tablet, gaming console, or anything else digital.
The smartphone is pretty much universal, it's like the swiss army knife of tech - does everything most people need reasonably well, in an easy to carry and use form factor, and with how integrated technology is into society it's a must-have. Everything else I just listed, and now VR headsets, are more specialized to specific tasks. I own a VR headset, and it's
- a decent alternative to a home gym that needs less space
- a fun peripheral to play video games with your own hands instead of just button inputs
- a way to virtually create more/bigger screens
And there are some professional applications too, ones I personally do not use in my line of work. Absolutely VR headsets have value. But do they do _everything,_ like a technological Swiss army knife? No, they do not. Do they do anything unique that _everyone_ needs? Nope, they don't do that either. That doesn't make them a gimmick, any more than a chop saw is a gimmick - but most people I know do not own or need a chop saw.
Drew you should invest in a pair of black ski goggles for these skits that imitate the vision pro
I’m not sure I can agree with the digital persona never taking off. I’d rather see a person over one, but with AI now being prevalent, it may be really close to the real thing eventually.
Unrelated to the video but I’ve been thinking more and more about eye tracking as the next input method for Macs with using hand tracking to click
There’s no cost advantage to a phone once everyone already has a headset
Whic will be smart glasses
I believe it will become way more useful when rather the hardware being in the device but it will be a simple receptacle for information. If the hardware becomes like the glasses you needed to by for your 3D tv, then yeah it will be very popular
We don’t know the future but the future knows us 😂
Personally I think the Vision Pro will get a non worn mode so you can take videos and pictures or display something on the eyesight display to make it easier you can even use it to see while taking a picture it’s incredibly useful and smart
Agree but it’s rather an update to eyesight so basically eyesight 2.0
I think it could be more of a desktop or laptop killer. I could see the advantage of sitting with the headset and having huge virtual screens to look at. But yeah it’s not really a sharing device unless everyone has it and information transfer is seamless.
It's not a laptop killer, and that's by design. It can't run *real* apps and you can't get those apps anywhere, just from the App Store. Apple wants it to be another "almost computer" like the iPad but not quite, so you're still encouraged to buy a Mac.
@@SnrubSource Laptops were killed long ago by notebook computers. Laptops killed suitcase computers, which were barely a thing anyway.
I would say it's more of an iPad or tablet killer.
Does anyone know if the Vision Pro/Mac screen sharing works on all M series Macs or is it just MacBooks? All the adds only show a MacBook and non of the desktops.
I’ve wondered the same thing actually
lmao i can't even Drew, with the fake Apple Visions, these skits slay me
I tend to agree with you Drew! Plus, as much as I’m intrigued by Vision Pro or similar immersive devices, I still love my iPhone! And it easily goes anywhere with me! 🥰
Completely agree
100%. I love VR (apple can try to rebrand all they like) and could definitely see most PCs and personal computer monitors replaced with improved VR devices. Currently battery life and comfort are issues but if they can eventually be equivalent to a pair of glasses then personal PC monitors are just gone. For most people their is no need for a laptop or PC now and the percentage that need them shrinks constantly. Shared screen experiences like a living room TV to watch movies together is something I struggle to see VR/AR ever replacing. If the VR screens can be light and good quality it would still make sense for them to be effectively an accessory for the smartphone with the phone having your data and more processing power that doesn't need to be strapped to your face.
They are not rebranding. You know mixed reality and vr are two different things right? Also the Vision Pro is a Mac on your head. People keep comparing this to vr gaming headsets. smh stop.
Sir, what are you using to mount your boxes?
Probably nails
I think eventually apple will make separate headsets/glasses. They'll have AR glasses and then VR headsets. And I think the AR glasses will be adopted across all phone manufacturers. Being able to show virtual "screens" with other people that are also wearing their respective AR glasses. I just imaging like an Iron Man Esq type of future where people are just passing and throwing around virtual screens and photos and links to other people across the room.
Shareability could potentially be solved if everyone has those AR glasses on lol. But relies n everyone having them on and then you could click some icon that makes it visible to other users
This is extremely short sided. Think of an apple vision style device that you can wear all day like the Rayban x Meta glasses. That's the direction this technology is going as AI/natural language computing, battery, cameras and processing tech advances.
That doesn’t address any of the problems I stated in the video
I’ve been saying this ever since people started talking about smart glasses replacing your phone. I co-sign everything you said in the video.
Yea honestly in the next 10-20 years contact lenses will be the headset replacement well 20-30
You have a point, re: camera. However the argument about supply chain and price is classic inverted causality: smartphones aren’t cheap because the supply chain and parts are cheap, the spiky chain and parts are cheap because the smart phone has such scale. Was not the case in 2007.
I like your conclusion, though: still a slab in your pocket, but it’s more a phone and input accessory to a head mounted display (which will almost certainly not be camera-based XR in a decade, but rather AR)
I think that all the technology we're seeing come out today is laying the foundation for what is to come, holographic technology. We got the mundane rectangular phones, we got the flips and folds and now we got a headset / pair of glasses type thing emulating a giant landscape that is typically considered a "desktop environment". Yeah, I'm banking (not literally) on holographic technology.
Im guessing the smart phone will be the "cpu" for the Headset at some point. In other words, it will plug in like the battery does now.
I agree. Companies have to now satisfy our need to communicate with each other across the internet while also producing items we will choose to buy over a competitor's. It has to be affordable, attractive, useful, and mainstream.
I think it will be replaced but not for another few decades and not by Vision Pro how it is now
THE SKITS THOUGH!
It’s weird apple doesn’t just make the vision pro for gaming and all the other cool stuff you can do with vr. The direction of trying to replace communication with vr is not going to happen. Maybe it will be something in 50 year people will say it was ahead of it’s time but so far the appeal of vr is very short term everyone I know with a vr headset barely uses it.
Btw you know you can take a picture on Vision Pro and airdrop it to people 😅
I agree
The fact the original iPhone from 2007 has a longer battery life than Vision Pro makes me agree with that iPhone will always have a longer battery no matter where battery technology goes
While I actually agree with what you’re saying, one thing you need to consider is the fact that you’re applying current functionality of a smatphone onto spatial computing which may not necessarily apply. VP might disrupt societal norms in a way that we can’t possibly imagine now. Easiest example I can give is photography and smartphones. Before smartphones very few people even considered the idea of taking photos in public. That was a hobby for photographers. Once the camera was introduced on the smartphone, society shifted and now we can’t imagine a world without it. This was CREATED by the phone. In short maybe it’s not going to replace the smartphone’s functionalities but may introduce new ways we interact with our world which could make what we do on smartphones less appealing. Personally I think AI devices have a better chance at doing this. in future the idea of looking at a screen… yeuch!
I don't think so, either. Now, highly-modified prescription glasses with a display controlled by a cellphone, that may be a different story.
I can see smartphones getting way smaller, lighter and thinner when spatial computing takes off. We‘ll use it less for content consumption and more for communication and functionality (camera, speakers etc.). The iPhone will be a necessary complimentary device to the Apple Vision.
Hmm. Eventually the headsets will be more lightweight and a normal part of stuff we wear. Your friends will all have them so to share the photo/meme, will be a case of sending it to their headsets rather than passing a device.
thats what blackberry and Nokia thought about touchscreens in 2007
They gotta just make the Vision Pro battery pack a little bigger
Yeah, just 5x bigger.
You're looking great Drew
Personally I think that we're heading for a point where computing is no longer done on location. I think that efficiency and processing power will both be solved with faster cellular and wifi connections that will allow you to have a compact device that would be about the same weight and size as a pair of glasses that, through bluetooth or wifi or some sort of wireless connection, is able to be equally as powerful as any desktop. We may even see companies use server farms that these devices connect to rather than people buying their own computers. Yes, that would create some privacy concerns, but it's pretty apparent that people aren't that concerned about their privacy when they get something out of it. All of this will bring down cost and reduce complexity and power consumption and make headsets cheaper than current smartphones. I also happen to think that everything, including taking photos, is something that can be solved with software. We just can't foresee how those problems will be solved now, just like every other technical problem we've ever solved. Plus AI in just a few years time will be accurate enough to fully rely on for all text input. I honestly would be shocked if smartphones were still widely used in 15 years.
Smartphone will not be replaced just like computers have been around for decades
Pretty small startup company eg: Nothing phone
The only tech that will be revolutionary will be small connected 3d holographic cameras that connect to your iPhone and allow you to project yourself or others life like to have meetings or conversations.
(Think R2D2 with the Princess saying “help me Obiwan Kinobi your my only help”
It's ok. I didnt really want VR headsets like the Vision Pro or Meta Quest to replace a smartphone anyway.
Just give me stage manager on the iPhone so I could plug it into a monitor like iPad.
The only way that happens, is when the glasses are small, and you can see reality, and the apps (programs) there's some, but they use you phone, it's not stand alone. Anyway.. burning 4000 on a headset phone? (Vision pro) hell no...
Selfie stick is a good comparison. I always wanted one. But when it comes to buying on. I never do because I don’t want to travel with extra stuff. Same with a GoPro. I’ll buy another GoPro before I ever get a selfie stick because I hate I didn’t have one when I rode ATVs in the desert. I still wish I had my own GoPro when I drove a Formula 1.
Remember the 1st cellphone was bigger than a brick?
This is your Steve ballmer moment
Well Steve Ballmer would be more harsh clown on the Vision pro
I won’t say it cannot replace a smart watch for everyone else. I don’t see this replacing the smartwatch for “me”. I do not like wearing glasses on my face for long periods of time. I got lasik for a reason. When I drive and the sun is in my eyes. I wear shades only in the car. That’s why I don’t bring them in the house. With that said. I am “not” walking around with extra large goggles on my face. I slap on my ultra 2. Wear it for multiple days. I charge it while in the shower. The end. I am curious about the Vision Pro. Curious if there’s any use I could enjoy using it outside of movies or CZcams videos, etc. But outside of OF. I mean, honestly, I have no plans to get this. Maybe when they release the SE model for 5 Hundred or something.
I've already replaced my smartphone with the Apple Watch series 9 GPS+Cellular Nike (Pure platinum/black sport band) Edition. I have it on wifi for most of the day (if at home) and use Apple Music while at the gym, and turn on GPS + Cellular when I need to make a phone call. It lasts all day (5:30am - 10pm) with no problems. Hope this helps.
Nobody said the iPhone is being replaced by vision pro. The iPhone is being replaced by the watch, earbuds/headphones, and tablets/foldable phone. The reason why is due to price, nobody wants to buy a $700+ every year. It’s better for them to charge u $700 for a phone, $400 for a watch, $300 for the earbuds; as you could justify to yourself to buy earbuds,watch every other year or 2, as u hold onto your phone for 5-10 years. Vision pro is more for home entertainment.
Literally thousands of people said iPhone is being replaced. No one said the watch is replacing the phone, especially due to the lack of camera
@@TailosiveTech what I meant was the I phone will become the new iPod. Most people I've come across prefer to use there watch to do quick stuff (answer the phone, quickly reply to a message, change song, ask Siri a question). The iPhone isn't going away but the younger generation is using iPads, watches, earbuds to do stuff. As much as I find foldable devices ridiculous, they are the next evolution of mobile devices. Wearable will be superior to mobile devices in 10 years. The iPhone will end up taking a back seat and will be in the category of the Mac book. The iPhone in 10 years will be more of a mobile power bank that can take photos and FaceTime.
Ok, we need a video of you wearing a muscle t-shirt.
It feels more like the perfect device for the next pandemic for those who lived all by themselves during covid.
Otherwise I agree, is just too isolated of a device to go fully mainstream, and tech wise if we didn’t manage to get on smartphones a 2-3 weeks battery life, as the old Nokias from 2000, this would require an even bigger breakthrough to be “yes, that’s it!”
The trick will be improving the experience by using both at the same time when needed. It’s not going to replace the smartphone.
Phones have plateaued since 2017 when the X came out......don't think much is gonna change anytime soon
This is going to age like milk.
It's not suppose to replace a phone...
bluetooth keyboards seems like the niche
Won't be until VisionOS, iPadOS becomes mainstream, which is likely to be at least 10yrs from now.
I see one day, VIsionPro will be the size of a pair a oversize sun glasses that wraps around your face.
I think it will move fast. iPadOS has no real competitor. Apple is the only real player in tablet game. But VisionOS will compete with Meta, Sony, Samsung/Google etc. headsets. Similar how android pushed iOS and vice versa.
There are 400 million iPadOS users globally. So yeah, it's already mainstream. The Mac, which has been around 40 years, has much smaller global user base of 130 million users.
I agree, for a few years, but "in our lifetime"?
I think you're underestimating the pace of change. In our lifetime, the VR era will come, and probably go. Smartphones will long be forgotten.
This will be replaced by technologies we can barely imagine. When my mother was young, she was working in a big hospital, which had invested a lot into buying ONE computer. That computer took up an entire room and had its dedicated technician. And basically all it could do was manage the equivalent of an Excel page. A LOT can happen in one generation. Oh, and it's evolving much faster than it was back then.
I am sure you don't know that VR was around long before the smartphone, almost 30 years before the smartphone and it is no where near as popular. Smartphones came and in barely 5 yrs dominated computing. Most radical changes in tech come from unpredictable products, VR is very predictable and has so many issues.
A1 skit! 😂
I think your right. The current Vision Pro is too cumbersome to replace a Smartphone. It may have more of a chance if could be shrunk down to the size of a pair of glasses, but even then, it wouldn't meet everybody's needs. I think the real smart phone replacement will come from a combination of retina and cerebral implants. Such implants would allow you to be continually connected to the cloud and communication services, enhance your visual capabilities (night-time vision, infrared etc.) and augment your brain's processing power and memory (e.g. translate in real time etc, instant access to large amounts of data, maybe even create a virtual copy of yourself for multitasking or enhanced sensory perception ...). But this will not be in my lifetime, but maybe yours.
Will see the state of things, in about 10 years.... I think a lot of how things will be then is going to be dictated by the wallet. What sells will get more funding to keep pushing the technology further and further. What doesn't sell, well it's going to get sidelined to some extent. Apple will keep trying new things which is great. But at the end of the day, if it doesn't sell then money and resources will back what can turn that investment into a profit.
See you in 10 years, the wait should be interesting....
smart, watches, taken over
As much as I believe AR technology does have a lot of potential, I don’t really see a world in which people wear a headset, or even something as small and light as a pair of smart glasses, all the time when out with people. I don’t think it can be compared to AirPods or Apple Watches because, as humans, we fundamentally communicate with our faces and it makes us uncomfortable if we can’t see other people’s faces. Even if we could have smart glasses with transparent displays that look exactly like normal glasses, I still don’t think people would want to wear them because they would worry that the glasses would make them look uglier. Because of that, I think AR devices are going to be something you put on to do very specific tasks and then you take off and don’t really wear passively.
For the sharing... They gonna perfect tony stark's hologram tech the picture just shows up in the air. Yeah yeah I know... But I think it's possible with time. Either way... I'm happy not having the vision
Just like radio did not kill books. Tv did not kill radio…a new technology never kills the old but rather complements it
What type of CZcams algorithm wiz is this, I just finished watching John‘s video (fpt) about how it will replace the phones eventually. I honestly think it will replace the phones when the tech gets good enough but I definitely don’t think anytime soon.
Never. I mean who wants to wear this thing on one’s face all day long. It’s just not happening
It will replace the smart phone, but in a few years. Sure the Vision Pro might be the most heaviest thing your head has seen, but eventually it’s gonna be glasses and in your brain. Soooo…
I certainly dont think first gen "spacial computers" will be replacing phones, but I think they're on their way. Apple is clearly gearing up for that by offloading the battery into a pocket. Imagine in a 5-10 years from now with new battery tech to get more capacity in smaller space, chip enhancements, AI capabilities - all of that might be going into our pockets and connected to a lightweight pair of glasses with a few sensors on them enhanced by advanced AI algorithms. We will just have to use natural language and eye+hand tracking operate it. I feel like such a techno-optimist right now!!
I think that you convinced me that the smartphone will be gone in my lifetime 😂😂😂 not by a vision device alone but a watch, a ring and glasses, it will
So three devices will replace one, seems like a step backwards
@@mjbaricua7403 Maybe... It all about the experience. If three devices can be more easy to use less distracting and allow me to do more things (or better) it can be better...
I see Apple vision replacing all* technology _except_ the iPhone. It will replace the Mac, the iPad, even TVs. But it will work _along side_ the iPhone
Smartphones are more likely to be replaced by the Vision Pro than computers are. I barely look at my iPhone except to use it as an actual phone because I have other devices with a better interface for everything else.
You're in the minority. The number of people I see nearly walking into incoming traffic, because their heads are buried in their phones, is quite staggering.
9:37 kinda gimmicky and dumb but what if the battery pack had a keyboard on it or someone made a Bluetooth keyboard that attaches to the battery pack
And add a camera to the battery, and a little display… oh wait that’s an iPhone
@@TailosiveTech 😂😂
For the masses, theres 3500 reasons why phones will not be replaced.
It’s no wonder Apple doesn’t allow comments on their CZcams channel.
Just watched their latest Apple Vision Pro ad and it look so lame.😂
I tend to disagree, I think we are starting to see what life could be like without a phone. I think in many, many years to come there will be glasses or even contact lenses which will display practically everything your iPhone does but using more and more AR. This will all be powered on something as small as an Apple Watch. So you’d have your watch as the computer and glasses or contacts as your display. The only thing I don’t see how they could change would be like you said, taking selfies or FaceTime, but everything else could be done with the glasses. Phones will still obviously be a thing because you can’t force everyone who doesn’t wear glasses or contacts to then have to start wearing them to be able to do their usual day to day tasks but a think a huge majority would switch. Iron man days are getting that little bit closes as each year goes on 😂
If phones get phased out ill still be the dinosaur using them cause i will never pay 3k to walk around with a clunky headset idc how much they shrink it and improve it im good 😂
This will age well in 5 years
I know they won't replace smartphones not going away in 2025 either
I too don't think it will replace our phones, but one day with this device I might just sell my gaming PC and never get a TV and replace those things. Maybe also replace the monitor, if/when you can extend the Mac display, not just pop it out.
Also if this thing was established in pandemic, everybody being home, it would've made A LOT more sense. Right not everyone can go out. Unless Apple is planning to release a new pandemic???? But that's just a THEORY xD
What 3D glasses taught us is ppl don’t want to wear things. We feel constricted and like to look at things at distance. If Apple persue this they’ll get better, smaller, lighter. But we fundamentally don’t like wearing things, especially constantly. Looking at something is very different to having it right in front of your eyes.
Idk I disagree these are passthru so you see your environment almost almost as clear as what we see natively it will just change the way you see the world in a way we can’t quite imagine yet
@@joeysantos3978 they may be pass through but you can still feel something covering your face, tactile wise
What 3D glasses taught us is that there are three different ways our eyes determine distance, perspective, stereoscopic vision, and focal length; and "3D" glasses only do the first two, and only partially does stereoscopic because it doesn't work right when you move your head. A regular 2D screen does the first one.
The reason people get headaches when using stereoscopic glasses is because the focal length doesn't match the stereoscopic distance.
It has a screen on the outside, the opening skit makes little sense