Do these 2 things better to CRUSH poker regs
Vložit
- čas přidán 1. 05. 2024
- Pro hand reviews! Join the discord!
discord.gg/Dvhpueg2qb
This video covers some advanced poker strategy. There are a few concepts related to value betting and bluffing made simple. Be sure to subscribe if you enjoy the content, and join that discord!
0:00 Why you're not crushing
1:28 Meet Mihai
2:01 Get Paid With Value
4:31 Bluff Correctly
#onlinepoker #poker #propoker #learnpoker #pokertheory
The discord is in the description, but also posting it here: discord.gg/Dvhpueg2qb
See you guys there! 😄
Man you really upped the production quality. Nice vid!
Thanks man!
100% agree, nice video !
I love your content man, I'm very glad you like mine 😄😄
Love the way you approach poker !! Great content !! Waiting for your next videos !! :D
More to come!
in the a5dd hand, If you have a bluff with Ad, are you also bluffing 4.5x pot? If not, wouldnt opponent easily figure out what you doing?
Every single one of these videos is great :)
I think what you're saying is crystal clear. There are population tendencies in player pools that deviate drastically from the Nash equilibrium, and so the idea of "Nash as a baseline", while being technically sound, is sort of suboptimal, because there are a lot of base assumptions we can make about our opponents that will hold true often enough to be exploitable as a baseline. It's not so much that playing GTO will cost you money, but that it will cost you profit. Also by studying a lot and finding where people are likely to make mistakes, we can purposefully bring them there in the game tree whenever the opportunity arises and set up these exploits more consistently.
thing is that you will never be 100% certain that your exploits actually work. one exploit might gain you in ev and another one might cost you, because of bad assumptions. there might be spots in which your exploits work against you and you basically exploit yourself by using the wrong frequencies. a good regular will also constantly adjust his strategy, so you will never know on which level you both are at.
It's true, but all you need is a slight edge to make money. You dont have to be right all the time. And it's not super difficult to get that edge if you know where to look!
Exactly right! Thanks for watching :)
At the table with all "abc" tags this is losing strategy. You need at least 2/9 fishes to execute this strategy.
Yeah 100%. The 80% vpip is mainly to play a ton of hands vs whales
BUT the principles I talked about are vs regs
Standard "Regs" are bad in multiway pots. They play too tight, scared and predictable in this situations. In tight games where the most pots are headsup,their mathematical edge beats handreading and bluffing skills of strong,but too loose player. That is why I think you need 2/9 fishes.
gto is excellent if you dont know anything about your opponent and ofc if you are bad at mda (just like me)
I am not sure you are making the correct assumption here... GTO is a "Baseline" strategy. In order to properly play a GTO based strategy you are supposed to deviate away from the Nash solution explosively to take advantage of your opponents mistakes. You seem to be thinking that a player that plays a GTO strategy does not know he is supposed to adjust.
That's what good poker players do, but believe me, I'm making this video because there's a lot of people who don't get it.
I'm also trying to criticize the "Nash as a baseline" strategy a bit here by pointing out just how far you can deviate, which most players don't get. Usually, people go with "let's learn to play Nash better and maybe deviate a bit from that", when really, it should be "let's learn what mistakes our opponents are making, and exploit them as much as we can." Nash is really really overrated - I can make more videos about how our opponents think and where Nash falls into that and where it doesn't
@@chaipokeracademy Well OK, but to say "Nash is overrated" when it is the solved mathematical solution to poker that can NOT be exploited regardless of your opponent's strategy rings hollow. I think what you want to say is that people need to deviate much further than most do, to make the most money versus a clueless Villain. There is NOWHERE that Nash does not fall into a strategy. I have heard many people make this claim, "my opponents don't play that way, so GTO does not work against them". Anyone that understands GTO knows better.
When I say "Nash is overrated" what I mean is that "trying to play Nash is overrated". I apologize for being unclear but I thought that the context was sufficient
@@chaipokeracademy I don't think we are very far apart here, and I am not trying to be a troll. I think in general you are making a great point about players not knowing how far to go with Nash, sorry if I sound argumentative that is not my intent. I am enjoying the content, and look forward to your future videos.
@@_Coffee4Closers Thanks man and I appreciate the comments! I had the worry when making the video that I wasn't 100% clear - so it's very very helpful to get feedback. Thanks for taking the time! 🙂
1)Nash is NOT the same as GTO.
2)You will only "force" your opponent to overcall if you are over bluffing.
3)You absolutely do not lose your edge if you're better at balancing your range than your opponent. Good player vs good player this is often a big part of your winrate. vs a fish do you want to be balanced ? No, but every idiot understands that..
Not trying to be a dick here but why are you making video's "explaining" a subject you clearly do not have a decent grasp of? Study first, teach later bro...
1) I completely understand Nash =/= GTO, which is why I choose my words very carefully in every video
2) I explain this more in-depth in the second half of the video, let me know if it's still unclear
3) If you are somehow able to play perfect Nash, you don't exploit people who are less balanced than you - you only win money when your opponent makes a pure mistake, not a frequency mistake. As QY, theory expert says,
"A lot of players think that at higher stakes, it's all about playing close to GTO. But I actually believe the opposite, in a way. Your opponents are no longer making serious fundamental mistakes (eg betting hands that are pure checks) that you can generate EV from by playing close to GTO. Which makes it even more important to try and exploit their frequency mistakes."
QY, by the way, loves my content, as do many other highstakes pros. I play HS professionally as well, almost exclusively vs regs, and my main goal is to always exploit frequency mistakes.
I'm sorry you didn't like the video, but I assure you, I do know very well what I'm talking about.