The AUR is life. Every time I go to check out some other distro, not having access to the aur is my biggest gripe. Like I just want one place to install all my software, and the aur delivers every time.
I do really like the AUR, but I only use it as a last resort honestly. If you don't read through what it does, sometimes it will update packages to versions incompatible with everything else, and it will break your system. Little experience, knowledge & reading what it's doing helps a lot, but still. I've seen many folk not realize that's how the AUR works and have broken their system due to incompatibilities.
honestly with the quality of your video, like sound, editing and etc. i was really surprised when i saw im the 748th guy to subscribe you, really a good job you have made :)
I have used multiple distros, and I keep coming back to arch. The main things always bringing me back are: 1. Arch can be very light. With most other distros I have to install some DE and then figure out ways to remove it. 2. AUR: probably the most brilliant bit of technology I use on a daily basis. I’ve heard other people have had issues with it, I personally can’t say I have.
I have been using Linux for 18+ years and Arch really is less trustworthy and more unreliable than Windows. I don't understand the delusional fanboyism about a piece of tech that cannot be trusted in the workplace. Try making a living using Arch. You'd be hungry on a cold, wet night and then your landlord evicts you as your rent is late, all because an update yet again broke your idolatrous Arch. It helps to have life experiences. Nothing .deb based ever let me down. I have installed major IT systems at factories, hospitals, computerised military function, even did IT in aviation. Arch is crap only good for kids, old & young at that, to play with. Grown-ups don't play with Arch.
@@forzatoro89 agreed, I actually ended up liking the laptop a lot more than I expected. If not for it being so heavy to carry out I would probably use it day to day
I tried Arch for the fun of it 2 years ago and I never left. I like the wiki a lot, I can find what I'm looking for very quick. The distro gives a very tidy impression and it is very versatile. Lately I switched to direct kernel booting with EFI, because I saw an CZcams vid of Brodie Robertson about it. I was to pleasantly surprised how easy it was to do and how well it works with software package updates. Just awesome.
@@PetrSzturc I think my comment is deleted, because I inserted a link. I think it is nmbl, as I understand it, that is a name for something that already existed. Since the link doesn't work: There is an Arch wiki page called "Unified kernel image". I followed those steps. I have mkinitcpio, so mine ended with "Optionally, remove any leftover initramfs-*.img from /boot or /efi." Nice one. I also ran the step described in 2.4. There is also an interesting page called "Arch boot process" and "EFISTUB".
@@rynn_3988 No, I'm not a gamer, I don't even have a dedicated GPU. I don't see a reason why it wouldn't work, although cachyos might slighlty more suitable for that.
While your staff have to Wiki away while their computers go on a strike, who get the job done and send invoices out? Systems even more reliable than Arch have bankrupted corporations and left people jobless. Think beyond entertaining yourself because you cannot make friends. Arch isn't your bestie.
the stuttering you mentioned in i3wm is not actual stuttering but screen tearing caused by the nature of xorg, you can fix the screen tearing of xorg using other compositor which rewrite the root of xorg, the best and most commonly used one is picom
Couldn't agree more. There's also a polling rate that I believe you can adjust, by default it's pretty low to help with system usage. I use picom to get window transparency in Qtile as well when I'm not using my usual Hyprland
a tip for those who are interested in distro hoping: have separate partitions for your home dir and root dir. this let's you slap on whatever distro you want for basically free. install whatever packages and you'll already have the configs there for it
sounds good, but in my experience, it is practically useless. you'll spend much more time fixing some weird shit (coming from versions incompatibility, differences in root configuration, patches, default distro software etc.) rather than manually merging initial home directory created by the distro itself with the stuff you really need to migrate. it also prevents your home from being hopelessly cluttered after several such "hops"
I've always stepped on a rake whenever I tried doing that. I now just do one btrfs partition with subvolumes, home being one of them. I find it easier to just backup my dotfiles and whatever data worth saving on a separate drive. Just restore the relevant stuff after a fresh install.
@@Xaito was about to comment, this is what I started doing too. Though I've found a weird but for me great distro I'm comfortable enough with sticking to for a few more times. Garuda Linux specifically, which aside from the theme is a pre-configured Arch layer distro that sets up nearly everything to my liking out of the box. Which I've been daily-driving for 2,5 years at this point, with no desire to change currently.
Arch is very nice initially. I love how simple and fast it is, and how it puts you in charge. But like all distros (except immutable distros and NixOS), every installation and update is all just mutation on top of mutation, so Arch diverges more and more over time (compared to a fresh install) and at some point it starts breaking after a few months or a year. This effect gets amplified by the rolling release model. I know that many people claim that it never broke for them, and I can imagine you can get close if you maintain your system well. I used it for 3 years, and have no regrets. But a release models are definitely more stable.
I miss those old thinkpads, owned 3 or 4 of them and the new ones just aren't the same. I've been playing with Arch on a spare machine and there is definitely a lot to like but I have to play with it some more before I decide on trying it as my daily driver.
My main problem with Arch is just the EFI installations, systemd and grub2 are very hard to install the keys on uefi motherboards.. Thatś why I stopped pure Arch and start using EndeavourOS and Manjaro instead... Great video man
1. Stop using Manjaro, EndeavourOS is great though. 2. by "keys" I assume you mean secure boot? Yes, can be a bit tricky, but use systemd boot and follow the arch wiki instructions and it's not THAT hard.
@@raf.nogueira Oh noo, did the boat sink? xD I get you buddy, it could def be better, and it probably will in the future. Just stay on an arch based distro, nothing wrong with that, they are quite literally made for people like you. :)
I have arch on both by desktop for about 3 years, tried different windows managers and eventually stayed with DWM for the last 2 years. Was thinking to move to Void Linux, but it would not change anything for better so staying with Arch and no plans to change it.
I like it even better than manjaro (arch with bells and whistles) it’s not for everyone but for the curious minded it’s a blast to figure out and configure just the way you want it.
sway may fix whatever issues you have on i3, it uses the same graphics backend as hyprland but otherwise it's the same as i3 and configuration is 99% compatible
@@lesbian_index_lebrorum_main I just meant wayland, but it was cool to read they're dropping wlroots. Also it doesn't really sound like aquamarine is supposed to be an alternative to wlroots from its description but i've only looked a little into it so not sure
The only linux distros that I have used are pop os and mint. I daily drove mint on my laptop for a year or so. I also really like this style of content. I honestly want to make a channel similar to this one and you inspire me.
As a Group CEO with five decades of IT experience: Arch is only good as a toy to keep kids occupied and out of sinful exploits. Just like Windows, it breaks after updates. Its instabilities makes it unsuited to an office or other production environment. As I have banned Samsung, anything Microsoft, and a host of social media from my organisation, we decided to use .deb only. For corporate work, Mint in its LMDE spin, and MX Linux ahs with KDE work best, so as to allow non-IT staff to get actual work done. Nobody ever said on their deathbed "pity I never installed Arch." Life is a precious gift; live it, taste it beyond the dull world of tech. I first had to get seven heart attcks and twelve strokes, literally, to learn that. A computer is there to work for me. If I have to spend all day under the hood, I'd rather MacBook Pro with LibreOffice at the office and be free to live at night.
I've recently switched to Destkop Linux after ditching Windows last year. I've tried several major distros but at the end I stuck happily on a Arch based distro. Other distros always had missing stuff in their repos. Flatpaks were great in theory, but in practice they start up like molasses and I regularly had to manually fix permission or portal issues. Nix was a close second place, but the barrier of entry was a bit too much for me - getting things done for a desktop Linux noob is easier with the help of Arch wiki.
one and only time i used Arch was about five years ago when i wanted to get some use out of an old Asus netbook that windows was simply too much for. it took blood, sweat and tears but i eventually got it working. anyway - that experience was actually so traumatic that i haven’t used Linux since lol, apart from the odd project. maybe i should give it a serious go again.
Get Endevour or Garuda; you can do Arch the Arch way after you see what it is capable of without the manual headache. I’ve done the vanilla install, and learned a great deal about Linux as a whole during the process. But I need a usable computer, so I went with Garuda this time.
I have the same machine, running Arch as well! I love the W530 and its’ K1000M GPU. Although, the Windows drivers for that GPU were much better than the Linux ones.
arch is just a minimalist systemd linux. There is nothing hard, difficult or fancy in using it. You set up dotfiles and systemd services like on any other systemd GNU/Linux. I see no reason people using something different than arch if they use systemd - its just installing bloat and somebodys else dotfiles. I never broke my arch install, I even run extra-testing repositories because of new KDE both on intel laptop and amd+nvidia desktop and its fine. btw i installed it once long time ago and rsync'ed from old pc. i would recommend a new linux user to start with arch because it has great manual installer and well documented installation procedure.
This video is perfect & very entertaining you've explained so well, you got some very good music taste. I bet you like j dilla. The song from him that i recommend is Don't Cry from the album donuts. You earned a subscriber
I also installed Arch as an experiment. I thought that maybe after week or two I will have some issues and will rolle back to another distro. But it turn's out that I use Arch 5 months now XD
I've Thinkpad T14 Gen 1 with Ryzen processor, I don't know what I'm missing from my arch installation but I can't play Story of Season on steam. It's running and then stopped, I've been set it to use proton tho
honestly, i really love hyprland sway uses wlroots, wlroots has some things lacking which causes many problems (*caused, fortunately most of it is already solved, just that it took too many years lol) and hyprland recently deattached from wlroots, wlroots was slowing down the development progress of hyprland currently, sway is quite decent but hyprland works better despite being newer, and has more development (*important note, works better on my usage, if for you sway works better, thats fantastic, then you should use sway*) and probably one of the main reasons why sway works worse, despite having much more years of development is because of wlroots... its like a dog trying to run while his owner is holding him on a leash preventing him from running..., and hyprland started being like that dog, but decided to change and now is going out with another owner, an owner that runs with him
I like Arch Linux for Steam games since Steam Deck supports it but certain games on Lutris I have noticed keep breaking on me causing me to rollback to Windows 10 just to get them to work hopefully it gets fixed if I had a Steam Deck though I would replace SteamOS with an open source operating system to future proof it like Garuda Dragonized it's a perfect Steam Deck future locking tactic that will save money and the Garuda distro looks absolutely beautiful with futuristic Neon Abstract Wallpaper that feels like Cyberpunk 2077 please take my request on trying it out if you get the time and see what I am doing wrong I can't get Oni to work made by Bungie and the installment keeps breaking and Wine won't help any better which is sad because I would kill to play it on Linux.
in over 6 years of running arch on every pc and server I have, the statement of "things will break" is total BS. Not one single f'ing time has it happened to me.
That might have been true +6 years ago, arch WAS pretty unstable. But in 2024, claiming "arch can break in an update", no, it does not. Not unless the user have done strange stuff on their system NOT following documentation. There is a higher risk of breaking your fixed point release installation (ubuntu, mint, popos, whatever) if updating instead of reinstalling new releases than it is to manage to bork an arch installation using pacman -Syu. If you use manjaro though, yeah, then it will break constantly when updating.. xD
it's the nature of the internet. Arch says "we're a rolling release distro, and while unlikely, updates could, potentially, break your system. So male sure to do your backups and keep the lts kernel updated" the internet hears "Arch will break on every update, and on every second update will come to your house and set you on fire"
It’s okay if you would rather use something else, the point is, you aren’t using Windows and that’s all that matters. I daily use Arch as my main OS, and I dual boot with Debian.
I mean, Arch Install is for users who know how to setup their systems the regular way but just can't be bothered since with the rolling release model they'd have to reinstall regularly anyway. If you don't like setting things up, just backup your own dotfiles if you're not happy with ML4W's. I've been using his as well but haven't tweaked everything just how I want it yet 😅
Why do you need to reinstall regularly with rolling release? It's exactly the opposite for me. All I have to do is update every so often, and I have the latest version of the system. No need for big, bulky major version updates.
@@icantcomeupwithnames469 my point was since you're bleeding edge you're more likely to live dangerously and accidentally bork your install at some point 😹
what? the opposite - with rolling realease you dont have to bother about some mayor realeases or something. how exactly would you break a linux intallation (unless its hardware disk error)? you think those power users cant uninstall certain package or reinstall grub?
@@michal1693 true, but depending on what you're doing, it might just be easier to reinstall, or you just want a fresh install. Either way, the script is there to take away some of the headache. My install has been rock solid for the most part and I run Timeshift just in case, but still, it's nice that it's there.
I don't get the appeal of tiling window managers. I guess some form of "mouse is an afterthought in this ui" can make sense when you are on a laptop with a crappy touchpad but not for my desktop.
I use arch for 5 years. still have no idea how to fix broken distro after Sudo pacman -suy after long time. if something breaks I just simply reinstall it
plasma gives you more control whereas gnome is a little restrictive in what you can do. And plasma impliments new features way faster than gnome. i'd say try it out and see if you like it.
Every time i try Linux osu runs unplayable, i always have input delay in my tablet and i found out with some help that the problem is i have 2 monitor which kills my game for reason. I have to use Linux just for this reason (and please, dont recommand lazer, it's terrible)
Using Archinstall is not the opposite of the proper way to install Arch Linux, per se. It's just the way of installing it that doesn't needlessly require an hour or more of your time.
Unless you uninstalled it already: "Please don't change the SDDM theme from the community store (KDE Plasma 6). They are broken and break your login management."
if your goal is to 'fiddle with your OS,' arch is amazing. you'll learn a lot about linux by just installing it, and its a great gateway to LFS. as a daily driver it is just stupid and absurd. the os you use should not be one you have to constantly tweak. it should just work or your productivity is gone because you are tweaking your configs all the time.
It’s hell, lot harder than you thing, but once you start to get what that is you love experience I installed arch two days back now, configuring how it work
Old was better for tiling windows managers. Grouping so much into things like hyprland is turning arch into windows-lite (clean optimized windows). Convenience tradeoff is fine for newer devices.
I first installed arch on 2014 , when i was 11yo
I was so pround of myself
You should! That is pretty impressive! :)
If you have a Steam Deck replace SteamOS with Garuda Linux if you want a future proof Steam Deck your wallet will thank you.
@@TechnoMinded-qp5in Why use such a heavy out-of-the-box disto? Why not pull CachyOS handheld edition?
@@lumeronswift for real.
@@lumeronswiftor maybe go all the way to Jovian-NixOS
The AUR is life. Every time I go to check out some other distro, not having access to the aur is my biggest gripe. Like I just want one place to install all my software, and the aur delivers every time.
yeah facts
do it in a distrobox and feel the freeing embrace of a stable non-rolling host system instead. :)
I do really like the AUR, but I only use it as a last resort honestly. If you don't read through what it does, sometimes it will update packages to versions incompatible with everything else, and it will break your system.
Little experience, knowledge & reading what it's doing helps a lot, but still.
I've seen many folk not realize that's how the AUR works and have broken their system due to incompatibilities.
I install AUR packages straight to my debian install because I simply don't care
fr AURs are such a blessing in comparison to PPAs on Debian/Ubuntu
honestly with the quality of your video, like sound, editing and etc. i was really surprised when i saw im the 748th guy to subscribe you, really a good job you have made :)
glad you like it, more videos coming soon!
I use arch btw
We
We
We
We
We
I have used multiple distros, and I keep coming back to arch.
The main things always bringing me back are:
1. Arch can be very light. With most other distros I have to install some DE and then figure out ways to remove it.
2. AUR: probably the most brilliant bit of technology I use on a daily basis. I’ve heard other people have had issues with it, I personally can’t say I have.
what's so special about the aur though?
I have been using Linux for 18+ years and Arch really is less trustworthy and more unreliable than Windows. I don't understand the delusional fanboyism about a piece of tech that cannot be trusted in the workplace. Try making a living using Arch. You'd be hungry on a cold, wet night and then your landlord evicts you as your rent is late, all because an update yet again broke your idolatrous Arch. It helps to have life experiences. Nothing .deb based ever let me down. I have installed major IT systems at factories, hospitals, computerised military function, even did IT in aviation. Arch is crap only good for kids, old & young at that, to play with. Grown-ups don't play with Arch.
@@Afriqueleblanq gentoo then
The thinkpad W530 is honestly better than 80% of laptops around today :D
@@forzatoro89 agreed, I actually ended up liking the laptop a lot more than I expected. If not for it being so heavy to carry out I would probably use it day to day
I bought a "broken" e560 for $60 on ebay and honestly it is a really good laptop, it's the first good laptop I have owned
I tried Arch for the fun of it 2 years ago and I never left. I like the wiki a lot, I can find what I'm looking for very quick. The distro gives a very tidy impression and it is very versatile. Lately I switched to direct kernel booting with EFI, because I saw an CZcams vid of Brodie Robertson about it. I was to pleasantly surprised how easy it was to do and how well it works with software package updates. Just awesome.
@@PetrSzturc Yes, I believe it's nmbl. I followed this: wiki.archlinux.org/title/Unified_kernel_image
@@PetrSzturc I think my comment is deleted, because I inserted a link. I think it is nmbl, as I understand it, that is a name for something that already existed. Since the link doesn't work: There is an Arch wiki page called "Unified kernel image". I followed those steps. I have mkinitcpio, so mine ended with "Optionally, remove any leftover initramfs-*.img from /boot or /efi." Nice one. I also ran the step described in 2.4. There is also an interesting page called "Arch boot process" and "EFISTUB".
Do you play games with it?
@@rynn_3988 No, I'm not a gamer, I don't even have a dedicated GPU. I don't see a reason why it wouldn't work, although cachyos might slighlty more suitable for that.
While your staff have to Wiki away while their computers go on a strike, who get the job done and send invoices out? Systems even more reliable than Arch have bankrupted corporations and left people jobless. Think beyond entertaining yourself because you cannot make friends. Arch isn't your bestie.
the stuttering you mentioned in i3wm is not actual stuttering but screen tearing caused by the nature of xorg, you can fix the screen tearing of xorg using other compositor which rewrite the root of xorg, the best and most commonly used one is picom
Couldn't agree more.
There's also a polling rate that I believe you can adjust, by default it's pretty low to help with system usage.
I use picom to get window transparency in Qtile as well when I'm not using my usual Hyprland
This!
Arch+Gnome+Flatpak+AUR is all one needs for a functional Linux distro.
a tip for those who are interested in distro hoping: have separate partitions for your home dir and root dir. this let's you slap on whatever distro you want for basically free. install whatever packages and you'll already have the configs there for it
don't you also have to copy the /etc?
@@TheDZHEX yeah, but you keep the majority of the stuff you use. apps and whatnot. good catch tho i forgot about /etc lol
sounds good, but in my experience, it is practically useless. you'll spend much more time fixing some weird shit (coming from versions incompatibility, differences in root configuration, patches, default distro software etc.) rather than manually merging initial home directory created by the distro itself with the stuff you really need to migrate. it also prevents your home from being hopelessly cluttered after several such "hops"
I've always stepped on a rake whenever I tried doing that. I now just do one btrfs partition with subvolumes, home being one of them. I find it easier to just backup my dotfiles and whatever data worth saving on a separate drive. Just restore the relevant stuff after a fresh install.
@@Xaito was about to comment, this is what I started doing too.
Though I've found a weird but for me great distro I'm comfortable enough with sticking to for a few more times.
Garuda Linux specifically, which aside from the theme is a pre-configured Arch layer distro that sets up nearly everything to my liking out of the box.
Which I've been daily-driving for 2,5 years at this point, with no desire to change currently.
Arch is very nice initially. I love how simple and fast it is, and how it puts you in charge. But like all distros (except immutable distros and NixOS), every installation and update is all just mutation on top of mutation, so Arch diverges more and more over time (compared to a fresh install) and at some point it starts breaking after a few months or a year. This effect gets amplified by the rolling release model. I know that many people claim that it never broke for them, and I can imagine you can get close if you maintain your system well. I used it for 3 years, and have no regrets. But a release models are definitely more stable.
this is happened to me, i install arch for like 2 weeks and after that my system fell apart. arch just not for everyone imo
heey nice video! i love hyprland it is pretty smooth
I miss those old thinkpads, owned 3 or 4 of them and the new ones just aren't the same. I've been playing with Arch on a spare machine and there is definitely a lot to like but I have to play with it some more before I decide on trying it as my daily driver.
My main problem with Arch is just the EFI installations, systemd and grub2 are very hard to install the keys on uefi motherboards.. Thatś why I stopped pure Arch and start using EndeavourOS and Manjaro instead... Great video man
1. Stop using Manjaro, EndeavourOS is great though.
2. by "keys" I assume you mean secure boot? Yes, can be a bit tricky, but use systemd boot and follow the arch wiki instructions and it's not THAT hard.
@marcusjohansson668 exactly. Every time I tried to configure the security boat in my machine, I broke the arch
@@raf.nogueira Oh noo, did the boat sink? xD
I get you buddy, it could def be better, and it probably will in the future.
Just stay on an arch based distro, nothing wrong with that, they are quite literally made for people like you. :)
I agree with other guy, Get off the Manajaro..
Give the arch install script a whirl if you struggle with the EFI setup.
Or just don’t use Secure Boot? 🤔
Been running Arch since april 2023. Don't regret a thing. I haven't needed to reinstall, and it doesn't break as some people say.
I have found that CZcams does work better in Arch than most distros I have tried, like Fedora, Manjaro, Ubuntu, and Linux Mint.
I have arch on both by desktop for about 3 years, tried different windows managers and eventually stayed with DWM for the last 2 years.
Was thinking to move to Void Linux, but it would not change anything for better so staying with Arch and no plans to change it.
I like it even better than manjaro (arch with bells and whistles) it’s not for everyone but for the curious minded it’s a blast to figure out and configure just the way you want it.
sway may fix whatever issues you have on i3, it uses the same graphics backend as hyprland but otherwise it's the same as i3 and configuration is 99% compatible
yep, I'm fairly sure it was because of X11
hyprland backend is aquamarine not wlroots
@@lesbian_index_lebrorum_main I just meant wayland, but it was cool to read they're dropping wlroots. Also it doesn't really sound like aquamarine is supposed to be an alternative to wlroots from its description but i've only looked a little into it so not sure
I dig your style. Keep up the good work.
Bro used my photo at 0:53, I'm honored!
yoo 🫡
The only linux distros that I have used are pop os and mint. I daily drove mint on my laptop for a year or so. I also really like this style of content. I honestly want to make a channel similar to this one and you inspire me.
Hyprland is life
hyprland is bloat
@@icantcomeupwithnames469that config is bloat tbh
hyprland only has hype going for it
@@icantcomeupwithnames469 *hyprland is aesthetic bloat (it only uses 0% of my cpu and 40MiB of ram)
hyprland is meme-ricing your linux to look 'cool' on forums
As a Group CEO with five decades of IT experience: Arch is only good as a toy to keep kids occupied and out of sinful exploits. Just like Windows, it breaks after updates. Its instabilities makes it unsuited to an office or other production environment. As I have banned Samsung, anything Microsoft, and a host of social media from my organisation, we decided to use .deb only. For corporate work, Mint in its LMDE spin, and MX Linux ahs with KDE work best, so as to allow non-IT staff to get actual work done. Nobody ever said on their deathbed "pity I never installed Arch." Life is a precious gift; live it, taste it beyond the dull world of tech. I first had to get seven heart attcks and twelve strokes, literally, to learn that. A computer is there to work for me. If I have to spend all day under the hood, I'd rather MacBook Pro with LibreOffice at the office and be free to live at night.
I've recently switched to Destkop Linux after ditching Windows last year. I've tried several major distros but at the end I stuck happily on a Arch based distro.
Other distros always had missing stuff in their repos. Flatpaks were great in theory, but in practice they start up like molasses and I regularly had to manually fix permission or portal issues.
Nix was a close second place, but the barrier of entry was a bit too much for me - getting things done for a desktop Linux noob is easier with the help of Arch wiki.
Awesome video!
one and only time i used Arch was about five years ago when i wanted to get some use out of an old Asus netbook that windows was simply too much for. it took blood, sweat and tears but i eventually got it working.
anyway - that experience was actually so traumatic that i haven’t used Linux since lol, apart from the odd project. maybe i should give it a serious go again.
@@tecc9999 go for it!
Get Endevour or Garuda; you can do Arch the Arch way after you see what it is capable of without the manual headache.
I’ve done the vanilla install, and learned a great deal about Linux as a whole during the process. But I need a usable computer, so I went with Garuda this time.
welcome to rabbit hole , all day browsing
Just wanted to use Arch to learn Linux, been sticking with it. I love how minimal it is, how I can choose what I want to install
I have the same machine, running Arch as well! I love the W530 and its’ K1000M GPU. Although, the Windows drivers for that GPU were much better than the Linux ones.
I really like those videos. It's really well explained
I have helped people and my friends install arch but never on my machine.. should definitely try sometime..
Hyprland > i3 . Dynamic tiling gang gang. I have a beelink ser5 with a ryzen 5600h powering it all. Very satisfied.
I love these types of videos ❤
I use debian btw
it begins
used arch+kde a while ultimately decided that the convenience of kubuntu is my true nirvana
Great video🎉
arch is just a minimalist systemd linux. There is nothing hard, difficult or fancy in using it. You set up dotfiles and systemd services like on any other systemd GNU/Linux. I see no reason people using something different than arch if they use systemd - its just installing bloat and somebodys else dotfiles. I never broke my arch install, I even run extra-testing repositories because of new KDE both on intel laptop and amd+nvidia desktop and its fine. btw i installed it once long time ago and rsync'ed from old pc. i would recommend a new linux user to start with arch because it has great manual installer and well documented installation procedure.
W for thinkpad
This video is perfect & very entertaining you've explained so well, you got some very good music taste. I bet you like j dilla. The song from him that i recommend is Don't Cry from the album donuts. You earned a subscriber
you're right! i'm a huge fan of nujabes and j dilla haha, their sampling is genuinely out of this world
Nujabes is my fav too
Based Quaver enjoyer, respect.
I also installed Arch as an experiment. I thought that maybe after week or two I will have some issues and will rolle back to another distro. But it turn's out that I use Arch 5 months now XD
Yeah, I just recently started dual booting with it on my desktop as well, no issues so far!
I've Thinkpad T14 Gen 1 with Ryzen processor, I don't know what I'm missing from my arch installation but I can't play Story of Season on steam. It's running and then stopped, I've been set it to use proton tho
try using Lutis or Bottles to run it through vine.
It might be a problem with MScode redistributibles, like it was for WH40k boltgun for me.
@@edusoto2509 thank for the insight! I'll check and read more about it later
@@malamhari_ no problem :)
honestly, i really love hyprland
sway uses wlroots, wlroots has some things lacking which causes many problems (*caused, fortunately most of it is already solved, just that it took too many years lol)
and hyprland recently deattached from wlroots, wlroots was slowing down the development progress of hyprland
currently, sway is quite decent but hyprland works better despite being newer, and has more development
(*important note, works better on my usage, if for you sway works better, thats fantastic, then you should use sway*)
and probably one of the main reasons why sway works worse, despite having much more years of development is because of wlroots...
its like a dog trying to run while his owner is holding him on a leash preventing him from running...,
and hyprland started being like that dog, but decided to change and now is going out with another owner, an owner that runs with him
I like Arch Linux for Steam games since Steam Deck supports it but certain games on Lutris I have noticed keep breaking on me causing me to rollback to Windows 10 just to get them to work hopefully it gets fixed if I had a Steam Deck though I would replace SteamOS with an open source operating system to future proof it like Garuda Dragonized it's a perfect Steam Deck future locking tactic that will save money and the Garuda distro looks absolutely beautiful with futuristic Neon Abstract Wallpaper that feels like Cyberpunk 2077 please take my request on trying it out if you get the time and see what I am doing wrong I can't get Oni to work made by Bungie and the installment keeps breaking and Wine won't help any better which is sad because I would kill to play it on Linux.
Learn to use punctuation marks.
I don't use Arch BTW, but I do use Linux. MX to be exact😉
welcome to the team btw
Great video!
in over 6 years of running arch on every pc and server I have, the statement of "things will break" is total BS. Not one single f'ing time has it happened to me.
it is very unlikely but not an impossibility, better stated as "may break"
My arch braking with updates
That might have been true +6 years ago, arch WAS pretty unstable. But in 2024, claiming "arch can break in an update", no, it does not. Not unless the user have done strange stuff on their system NOT following documentation.
There is a higher risk of breaking your fixed point release installation (ubuntu, mint, popos, whatever) if updating instead of reinstalling new releases than it is to manage to bork an arch installation using pacman -Syu.
If you use manjaro though, yeah, then it will break constantly when updating.. xD
it's the nature of the internet. Arch says "we're a rolling release distro, and while unlikely, updates could, potentially, break your system. So male sure to do your backups and keep the lts kernel updated"
the internet hears "Arch will break on every update, and on every second update will come to your house and set you on fire"
Great for work in HOME but Why the CLOUD its not adopted ARCH???? its becasuse no make sense have arch at this point.
what is your laptop model? do you recommend it?
w530, it's a good laptop but a little old and heavy. I would recommend getting something newer, maybe like a T480 or T490
@@Ryclic thank you
Very nice video 👏🏽👏🏽
Archcraft is a time saver.
0:30 omg Quaver mentioned
Guys, i can finally say that i use Arch, btw.
I use Linux Mint btw, because I can't stand Arch
It’s okay if you would rather use something else, the point is, you aren’t using Windows and that’s all that matters. I daily use Arch as my main OS, and I dual boot with Debian.
You should give River window manager a try
I mean, Arch Install is for users who know how to setup their systems the regular way but just can't be bothered since with the rolling release model they'd have to reinstall regularly anyway. If you don't like setting things up, just backup your own dotfiles if you're not happy with ML4W's. I've been using his as well but haven't tweaked everything just how I want it yet 😅
Why do you need to reinstall regularly with rolling release? It's exactly the opposite for me. All I have to do is update every so often, and I have the latest version of the system. No need for big, bulky major version updates.
@@icantcomeupwithnames469 my point was since you're bleeding edge you're more likely to live dangerously and accidentally bork your install at some point 😹
what? the opposite - with rolling realease you dont have to bother about some mayor realeases or something. how exactly would you break a linux intallation (unless its hardware disk error)? you think those power users cant uninstall certain package or reinstall grub?
@@michal1693 true, but depending on what you're doing, it might just be easier to reinstall, or you just want a fresh install. Either way, the script is there to take away some of the headache. My install has been rock solid for the most part and I run Timeshift just in case, but still, it's nice that it's there.
I ak new to these things can you tell me how to backup dot files
Is that Hyprland? its truly awesome!
I don't get the appeal of tiling window managers. I guess some form of "mouse is an afterthought in this ui" can make sense when you are on a laptop with a crappy touchpad but not for my desktop.
I use ubuntu BTW
+1 sub great vid you deserve 100k
I use arch for 5 years. still have no idea how to fix broken distro after Sudo pacman -suy after long time. if something breaks I just simply reinstall it
Catchy gang (I use cachyOS btw)
i switched to arch from ubuntu and i have been using gnome. is plasma better?
plasma gives you more control whereas gnome is a little restrictive in what you can do. And plasma impliments new features way faster than gnome. i'd say try it out and see if you like it.
I use artix by the way
Nice Vid. I Use Arch BTW
09:28 how do you make it look like that man? Looks amazing!!
i'm using the ML4W config running Hyprland!
801th sub, comment before this dude hits 1000 subs
🙏 probably gonna need to upload another video to hit 1k tho
@@Ryclic If im being honest, I have never had a creator reply to me, so your the first:)
@@Ryclic Another thing, should I switch from Kubuntu to EndeavourOS?
nice video!
I just wanted to use hyprland😅
You get pro user points for being on Arch, the only way to gain more respect is to use Nicks OS
It's time for NixOS.
Every time i try Linux osu runs unplayable, i always have input delay in my tablet and i found out with some help that the problem is i have 2 monitor which kills my game for reason. I have to use Linux just for this reason (and please, dont recommand lazer, it's terrible)
Using Archinstall is not the opposite of the proper way to install Arch Linux, per se. It's just the way of installing it that doesn't needlessly require an hour or more of your time.
I use Arch, btw
arch, dwm and st btw
Unless you uninstalled it already: "Please don't change the SDDM theme from the community store (KDE Plasma 6). They are broken and break your login management."
I use Arch btw
I use mint btw
Build your own distro sim 400
I use Garuda XFCE btw
Doesn’t have the same ring to it
if your goal is to 'fiddle with your OS,' arch is amazing. you'll learn a lot about linux by just installing it, and its a great gateway to LFS. as a daily driver it is just stupid and absurd. the os you use should not be one you have to constantly tweak. it should just work or your productivity is gone because you are tweaking your configs all the time.
I've never found that you have to tweak it. It's more that you get tempted to.
what game was in the first+ i use arch btw
what timestamp?
i can't not use arch anymore. all the package managers suck. pacman does too, but somehow... it sucks less...
W vid
I also use Linux. Arch btw.
I wanna use arch btw
I use Arch - BTW
Linux confuses me. Bro i dont like windows but linux is also confusing for me to understand
It’s hell, lot harder than you thing, but once you start to get what that is you love experience I installed arch two days back now, configuring how it work
Ok, so how did you play osu! on linix? Was it osu lazer? McOsu?
osu lazer, yes
Hyprland is not for me(bloated imo). But "sway wm" is.
Old was better for tiling windows managers. Grouping so much into things like hyprland is turning arch into windows-lite (clean optimized windows). Convenience tradeoff is fine for newer devices.
I use chromeOs btw
Ewwww hell no ChromeOS is worse than Windows dude and sends your information to the Google data center you're not getting praise points buddy.
@@TechnoMinded-qp5inchromeos is a gentoo-based distro btw
@@icantcomeupwithnames469you dont even have to install it (IN MOST CASSES) as long as you just buy a chromebook btw
@@icantcomeupwithnames469But it's still spyware, better to coreboot the Chromebook and install "real" Gentoo
@7:22 learned nothing UpTo this part.
Harris Steven Young Sandra Jackson Jose
I use Arch btw.
Try CachyOS
What's that song in the intro man?
Viewer Suggestions from czcams.com/video/CPfPwDxFg2Y/video.html
@@Ryclic quality bruh
Perez Amy Robinson Steven Clark Elizabeth
what thinkpad is this?
w530