12 Most Efficient Four Seat Airplanes

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 19. 11. 2020
  • Since fuel consumption is a significant portion of an airplane operating costs, the aviation industry has continually been striving to improve aircraft fuel efficiency. We are not talking about four-seat airplanes with the lowest fuel consumption. The fuel economy of an aircraft is a measure of how much fuel an aircraft needs to operate in relation to the service provided. For example, a four-seat plane that burns 20 gallons per hour, and cruises at 300 miles per hour, with 1500 pounds useful load is far more efficient than a plane that burns only 8 gallons and 200 miles per hour cruise with 500 pounds useful load. Now that you have an idea of what efficiency means in aviation, you can get into the video.
    Please let us know your favorite airplane in the comment section.
    You can Support us on Patreon here: / dwaynesaviation
    ....................................................
    Our channel is about Aviation..
    We make the best educational aviation videos you've ever seen
    Please subscribe to our channel to keep up with us.
    #bestfourseairplanes #mostefficientpersonalairplanes
    ................................................................

Komentáře • 192

  • @delschier1419
    @delschier1419 Před 3 lety +97

    My Cozy IV 4 seat canard cruises at 200 mph and uses 6.5 GPH at that speed. It has 1400 mi range with reserve with 675 pounds of passengers. A Cozy IV can be purchased used under $74K.

    • @justtwoseats
      @justtwoseats Před 3 lety +6

      Yeah, he missed a lot of interesting planes. Probably why it has such a high dislike to like ratio.

    • @AzjaVhera
      @AzjaVhera Před 2 lety +20

      @@justtwoseats wishing you could still see the like/dislike ratio smh

    • @snotrod33
      @snotrod33 Před 2 lety +12

      @@AzjaVhera I agree. Unfortunately we now live in a time where people are extremely sensitive and can't even bear the lightest of constructive criticism.
      Thanks to social media, we have created a whole new breed of offended culture.

    • @brighambaker3381
      @brighambaker3381 Před 2 lety +1

      The Cozy Mk IV is my top choice right now, as I'm planning to build at some point.

    • @sethenock8478
      @sethenock8478 Před rokem

      Can you train me on how to pilot a plane?

  • @MrJohnsonx3
    @MrJohnsonx3 Před 2 lety +27

    New drinking game, everytime dude says, " with AV gas costing about $6/gallon" take a drink.

  • @Dave-hc6pp
    @Dave-hc6pp Před 3 lety +14

    I’m 6’5” and 305 lbs. I take up the useful load on most 4 seaters.

  • @johnwoodruff7207
    @johnwoodruff7207 Před 3 lety +22

    We fly the da40 ng with the jet A engine and it burns 6.6 gal hr and flys smooth.

  • @DirtyLilHobo
    @DirtyLilHobo Před 2 lety +10

    Just because an aircraft has four seats does not mean those seats can be occupied. Passenger occupancy depends upon many factors such as individual passenger weight, fuel load, baggage or cargo load, center of gravity limits, aircraft performance, density altitude, runway length, obstacle clearance demands.. I’ve seen many an accident wherein a pilot successfully departed a low altitude airport near sea level, flew to a high altitude airport at midday, refueled then crashed on takeoff due to reduced aircraft performance and density altitude being well above the airport elevation.

  • @AClark-gs5gl
    @AClark-gs5gl Před 3 lety

    Thoroughly enjoyed your informative video. Keep up the great work!

  • @johnwhitehead5457
    @johnwhitehead5457 Před 3 lety +23

    A 172 is a Skyhawk not a Skylane. The Skylane in a 182.

  • @peteranninos2506
    @peteranninos2506 Před 7 měsíci +1

    Cardinal RG has 1036 useful load, 48" shoulder room, stretch out room in the back seat, enormous doors and I cruise at about 150mph at 8gph. With full tanks (and 3 people) I can manage around 900 miles at economy cruise.

  • @jairo7997
    @jairo7997 Před 3 lety

    Thanks mate very good information.

  • @vagabondwheels3002
    @vagabondwheels3002 Před 3 lety +36

    Just curious why the Velocity XL-RG didn't make the list - everything I've read about it suggests it would be competitive with these. Maybe not but just curious why then. The plane Mojo Grip is building too. It' s a Sling four seater and seems both fast and efficient too. Just curious what kept these two off the list.

  • @theentirenationofsweden7901

    "Can hold people 6' tall" *_Cries in 6'5"_*

  • @nightflyer40
    @nightflyer40 Před 3 lety +3

    Great vid those planes are real beauties.

  • @MultiGrumman
    @MultiGrumman Před 3 lety +3

    Очень хороший анализ и сравнение:). Спасибо за видео. Успехов и удачи:).

  • @marcpasquini1029
    @marcpasquini1029 Před 3 lety +15

    The cost of a new Cessna 172 SP is closer to $500,000.00

  • @ssn608
    @ssn608 Před 2 lety +3

    WILDLY out of date. Prices are very much higher than stated. Panthera is ONLY available as gas engine, and not available as a kit.

  • @Ebbyman413
    @Ebbyman413 Před měsícem

    I'm a bit surprised that the Sling TSI isn't on this list!

  • @djatnikasaleh2218
    @djatnikasaleh2218 Před 2 lety

    The review is good but would be better if you put a grafik (fuel consumption, range, load, speed and price) at the end & the viewers get well informed.

  • @SummitSecrets
    @SummitSecrets Před 2 lety +1

    How much is Av-gas again? Not sure if you mentioned it in the video...

  • @michaelmccotter4293
    @michaelmccotter4293 Před rokem +1

    Velocity XL
    230 mphcruise
    240+mph top speed
    1300 nm range
    1100 lb useful load
    1500ft to 1900ft per min climb

  • @gerardandrew4820
    @gerardandrew4820 Před 3 lety +19

    i am sorry, but how much did avgas cost? i think i missed the 300 times you mentioned it!

    • @rodelc644
      @rodelc644 Před 3 lety +2

      Lol. 6 dollars per gallon

    • @nevim007
      @nevim007 Před 3 lety +2

      @@rodelc644 Can you repeat that please

    • @razeel2000
      @razeel2000 Před 3 lety

      @@nevim007 He said "6", I think. I might be wrong, though.

    • @daviddeans
      @daviddeans Před 3 měsíci

      No you were right $6 per gallon is that us or imperial gallon

  • @robertblaney5033
    @robertblaney5033 Před 2 lety +10

    After watching this video, I couldn’t quite remember the price of avgas. Was that around $6 a gallon ?? 😂

    • @speckyferns6780
      @speckyferns6780 Před 2 lety +1

      You may have to watch the ENTIRE video to get this information - buried somewhere in the ramblings

    • @frankanderson4176
      @frankanderson4176 Před 2 lety +1

      What a riot! He only said the price about a zillion times.

  • @user-og3fb6ui2e
    @user-og3fb6ui2e Před 3 lety +5

    very strange criteria - personal aircraft have to be safe first of all, then safe in all stages of flight, then safe if the pilot make mistakes, then safe in case of failures & only then efficient - no ?)

  • @AviationWP
    @AviationWP Před rokem

    One of the efficiencies not incorporated here is the original purchase price which is largely inefficient averaging close to half a million USD for these airplanes.

  • @michaelmignone5869
    @michaelmignone5869 Před 2 lety

    How much does avgas cost per gallon? Don't think that was mentioned

  • @Il_Biondo
    @Il_Biondo Před 3 lety +34

    Can you please put the figures in knots and nm?

  • @DheerajBhaskar
    @DheerajBhaskar Před 2 lety +6

    Guys, how much does avgas typically cost? I think the video wasn't clear on this

  • @angusmclennan8747
    @angusmclennan8747 Před rokem

    when I changed from a c182 to a 210 my fuel used dropped per trip. When I sold my c172 for 260 comanche same journeyfuel went up 15l for a 400nm trip, and time burnt off the engine and prop was 65% of the 172. Work it out!!

  • @egreens8512
    @egreens8512 Před 3 lety +9

    Why no prices for Mooney Acclaim and cost approx for Lance Air, or Panthera thank you.

    • @jeffherndon
      @jeffherndon Před 3 lety +4

      Mooney is not making planes anymore. They laid off everyone 1/6/2020. They have been taken over by a LLC group of aviation buffs and are trying to do a few things to improve existing planes.

    • @keith77mn77
      @keith77mn77 Před 2 lety +1

      Maybe because their planes cost the better part of one million dollars new.

    • @eclectichoosier5474
      @eclectichoosier5474 Před 2 lety

      If you have to ask what it costs, you can't afford it.

  • @danielhasson6985
    @danielhasson6985 Před 3 lety +3

    Great video

  • @leeharrison3276
    @leeharrison3276 Před 2 lety

    How much does av gas cost?

  • @damianketcham
    @damianketcham Před 3 lety +12

    The Cozy IV easily fits into this category.

    • @ick79
      @ick79 Před 3 lety +3

      or even a Velocity. I started to list the planes that would fit into this... and lol every model they have does!!

  • @phl.333
    @phl.333 Před rokem +1

    Cool! Btw. you can fly the Tecnam 2006 with regular gas! ;)

    • @kr1pton1ck
      @kr1pton1ck Před 5 měsíci

      and it doesnt cost $6 per gallon. haha

  • @jonathanlanius8648
    @jonathanlanius8648 Před 3 lety +5

    Piper Comanche 250. Great safety record 11 gph 1000 mile range (90 gallon version) 180 kts. great airplane.

    • @33timbo
      @33timbo Před 3 lety +1

      I'm all about comanches being a Comanche owner myself but in what world are you seeing 180knots out of a 250? Vne is 202mph and 180knots is 207mph so that's just unrealistic

    • @jonathanlanius8648
      @jonathanlanius8648 Před 3 lety

      @@33timbo typo 180 mph.

  • @davidennis7241
    @davidennis7241 Před 2 lety +1

    In line with your introduction about the proper definition of "efficiency", should you not be estimating miles per gallon rather than gallons per hour?

  • @EricRyanSound
    @EricRyanSound Před 3 lety +1

    DA40, SR22T, Panthera

  • @charliebowman785
    @charliebowman785 Před 2 lety +2

    I consider this line up missing Piper Dakota, Arrow, Archer and of course, The Cherokee.

    • @tomnagel5634
      @tomnagel5634 Před rokem

      Charlie, you are correct! But many think the plastic planes are better. We'll see in 25 years. I'm thinking those Clorox bottles will all be scrap.

  • @Khoop
    @Khoop Před 3 lety +2

    I only have one question: How much is avgas per gallon, generally?

    • @scarybaldguy
      @scarybaldguy Před 3 lety

      It varies wildly. At my home field (DVT), last time I filled up a week ago it was $4.84 for 100LL. You can pay less than $4 or more than $10. It all depends on a lot of factors.

    • @speckyferns6780
      @speckyferns6780 Před 2 lety

      You may have to contact several suppliers and determine, this video certainly does not cover this.

    • @SooperKewl
      @SooperKewl Před 2 lety +1

      I think it’s about $6/gal. 😂

  • @mehmetvural8095
    @mehmetvural8095 Před 2 lety

    please detail and price.

  • @jimydoolittle3129
    @jimydoolittle3129 Před 3 lety +4

    RV10 the best of all ✈️❤️

    • @stephenj.p.ingley4033
      @stephenj.p.ingley4033 Před 2 lety +1

      Sorry Jimmy but a low wing bird is a non starter for those of us with shoulder issues. Lord knows I've tried....

    • @jimydoolittle3129
      @jimydoolittle3129 Před 2 lety +1

      @@stephenj.p.ingley4033 you’re absolutely right , the only thing that you can do is easy on the GYM 💪 🤣 best wishes on your training ✈️

  • @daveriley6310
    @daveriley6310 Před 3 lety +18

    5:04 I wouldn't put the word "just" prior to saying $450,000. At least not on this planet.

    • @thealteredstate4203
      @thealteredstate4203 Před 3 lety

      airplanes are for rich people tho lol

    • @thealteredstate4203
      @thealteredstate4203 Před 3 lety

      @Ken Kaneki true.. there is also the fuel cost tho that stuff is pretty expensive I think

    • @exit5398
      @exit5398 Před 3 lety

      @@thealteredstate4203 price per unit(in my country, we use gallons) is only about double that of your car, so really not all that awful, it's the volume that will get you.

    • @abrutus1
      @abrutus1 Před 3 lety

      Just landed at cleveland the other day in a turbo cessna 207. I parked at the fbo and when it came time to pay, the young lady wanting to confirm my bill told me, the airplane you are flying is “just a cessna” right? With an inocent pronunciation likely unaware that the “just a tiny cessna” probably costs more than her house. I smiled and replied, yes, im a humble pilot of “just a cessna” 😄

  • @wasatchm
    @wasatchm Před 3 lety +2

    I would think any 4 seat aircraft that has a rotax 914 or 915 engine would easily be the most fuel efficient. are there any out there? I think the sling 4 seat can come with a rotax 915 doesn't it? haven't heard of any other 4 seaters than come with a rotax 914 or 915.

    • @nichooo6423
      @nichooo6423 Před 3 lety

      The sling tsi uses the Rotax 915, it is very fuel efficent but you get less speed and less horsepower (compared to the planes in the video). It is still a great engine and many light sport aircraft/2 seater uses this engine

    • @christianjforbes
      @christianjforbes Před 3 lety

      I don’t find the 915 to be very efficient. It’s lighter, but that’s bout it. At its 75% cruise it’s only delivering 105hp at no better fuel burn than a Lyc. running at similar output. I’ve tried to find real world data that pilots see in cruise. You’ll notice it’s difficult to find. Best I’ve seen is 7.8ghp for the Rotax. A 150hp Lyc at 2,500rpm seems to consume about 7gph on average (from the fuel sheets going back 6 months at the FBO I was flying out of, so it’s what we really saw).

    • @andrewsampson9952
      @andrewsampson9952 Před 9 měsíci

      The Risen 915 is an amazing aeroplane - I hope they make a 4 seat version with a new Rotax 916

  • @jordanelkins9801
    @jordanelkins9801 Před 2 lety +1

    What was the average cost of avgas again?

  • @poianaminore
    @poianaminore Před 3 lety +4

    Tecnam forever!!

  • @davidgolden6068
    @davidgolden6068 Před 2 lety +1

    Your exclusion of canard aircraft means most of these aircraft arent in the actual top 12

  • @raksan4083
    @raksan4083 Před 3 lety +1

    I have wondered why Aircraft never seem to have Pet Crates or space for them in a cabin.Many families have pets they want to take with them.

    • @richardwitzel1526
      @richardwitzel1526 Před 3 lety

      My poodle loves to go for rides in the car. However I think he would have a heart attack in a plane before I even start the engine.

    • @FamilyManMoving
      @FamilyManMoving Před rokem +1

      Because all the people who fly with pets sit next to me on Southwest. That's why.

  • @fly4fun07
    @fly4fun07 Před 3 lety +4

    To be of true efficient value, you need to compare miles per gallon!

    • @bruceleealmighty
      @bruceleealmighty Před 3 lety +2

      Aircraft typically rate at knots or nautical miles and use hours because calculations are different in the air. Having said that, this could have been presented much better and much more thoroughly.

    • @fly4fun07
      @fly4fun07 Před 3 lety +1

      @@bruceleealmighty “because calculations are different in the air” ...laws of physics are consistent. NM per gallon flown in a no wind environment is the only way to measure efficiency.

    • @bruceleealmighty
      @bruceleealmighty Před 3 lety +4

      @@fly4fun07 Since most sights tend to avoid giving actual NMPG and typically try to bury the real info in statistics it's only the occasional aircraft like the Pipistrel Panthera that translates directly with 230mph @ 10gal = 23mpg really not that hard, but again, it could have been done more thoroughly.

  • @Araye
    @Araye Před 2 lety +2

    skylane is a 182... skyhawk is a 172

  • @mehmetvural8095
    @mehmetvural8095 Před 2 lety

    have a nice day. max speed. 275-300 mph. range 2000 mph. Two-seater plane for $200,000. A 4-seater plane for $300,000. Can I have it done to you or others? please provide information. thanks.

  • @Dhrruvv
    @Dhrruvv Před 3 lety +1

    Daimonds are the best 👍

  • @cesarquintana9034
    @cesarquintana9034 Před 3 lety

    172XP K model. The best.

  • @pilotguy
    @pilotguy Před 3 lety +15

    Where is the Sling Tsi?

    • @ibgarrett
      @ibgarrett Před 3 lety +3

      I literally came back here to make the same comment. I start building mine in a little over a month...

    • @YourFriendlyGApilot
      @YourFriendlyGApilot Před 3 lety +2

      Same here!!!

    • @apoloromero356
      @apoloromero356 Před 3 lety +1

      And the velocity XL

    • @YourFriendlyGApilot
      @YourFriendlyGApilot Před 3 lety +1

      @@apoloromero356 I've always wanted to take it for a spin :-p

    • @apoloromero356
      @apoloromero356 Před 3 lety +1

      @@YourFriendlyGApilot yeah seems like a really good aircraft. Fuel efficient, fast, 4 seater and omg the price is the best part. Also I guess they are really good at stall control, I mean they do not stall.
      For sure every pilot or human dream plane it is very complete. But unfortunately some people do not like to much the canard. I personally love it, but have never try one.

  • @richardperry21
    @richardperry21 Před 3 lety

    don't understand your math? @ 8 gph you can go 2.5 x longer than 20gph. The a/c burning 20gph goes 300 miles. A/C burning 8gph @200mph can go 500 miles on the same fuel. A/C burning 20gph can only go 300 miles.

    • @brettcyr7426
      @brettcyr7426 Před 3 lety

      I don't know anything about airplanes to say if this is a valid assumption or not, but he is assuming a linear relationship between weight and fuel consumption and calculating miles by pound useful load per gallon. So, based on his assumption (someone who knows about planes can speak to it's validity), the first plane gets 22,500 miles-pounds per gallon and the second plane gets 12,500 miles-pounds per gallon.

  • @elitrejonegron3495
    @elitrejonegron3495 Před 2 lety

    Range ???

  • @gregorybrown4062
    @gregorybrown4062 Před 8 měsíci

    IDC about four seaters. I need a six seater 😢

  • @fowyb
    @fowyb Před rokem

    Soooo... the Lancair Evolution doesn't burn any avgas huh? Thats pretty efficient...

  • @arcticlion7794
    @arcticlion7794 Před 3 lety +2

    Can you re do the same Video with international Data: km/h. Liter Kg etc... only Americans use stoneage measurements like gallons miles and so forth

    • @iotolaofrocknrolla2795
      @iotolaofrocknrolla2795 Před rokem

      It's because we created and built everything so we'll use whatever g*d d*mn measurement we want to. If it wasn't for the US, Europe would have burned 70 years ago so be quiet.

  • @PatPrice123
    @PatPrice123 Před 3 lety +12

    Early Cessna 172s (in the $30k range) are barely faster than a Cessna 150 and other generalizations and inaccuracies, IMO

  • @michaelclark7602
    @michaelclark7602 Před 3 lety

    Where is the Velicity?

  • @officiallilel889
    @officiallilel889 Před 3 lety +4

    I don't know why I'm here I don't even have my license

    • @ValiantPride
      @ValiantPride Před 3 lety +3

      not yet buddy, one day

    • @JohnSmith-nh9pm
      @JohnSmith-nh9pm Před 3 lety +2

      for the dream mate, u gotta dream before realising it xp

    • @officiallilel889
      @officiallilel889 Před 3 lety +2

      @@ValiantPride thank you very much

    • @officiallilel889
      @officiallilel889 Před 3 lety +2

      @@JohnSmith-nh9pm I hope you will too

    • @JohnSmith-nh9pm
      @JohnSmith-nh9pm Před 3 lety +1

      @@officiallilel889 Well, I'v got the licence now but looking foward to my new dream of affording one

  • @AClark-gs5gl
    @AClark-gs5gl Před 3 lety

    Currently working on a viable EDFJ/ELECTRIC DUCTED FAN JET that will incorporate a Tesla Turbine. A monumental task, but will achieve. Maximum efficiency... extremely vital.
    No... not an original idea.
    Twin EDFJs to be tested on a modufied Rutan Long-EZ.
    We hope to work with Tecnam and a modified/lighter in weight, P-2006.

    • @sircrapalot9954
      @sircrapalot9954 Před 2 lety +1

      Explain how EDFs are more efficient than a prop at low altitudes and airspeeds? Also how does a Tesla Turbine in particular provide anything of benefit in this sort of application?

  • @timkern462
    @timkern462 Před 2 lety

    Aside from the pricing and costs which change), this video is full of errors. Foe example, you can't load a 172 with four FAA adults and full tanks, and it wasn't introduced in 1952.
    The Tecnam's Rotax engines burn non-Ethanol unleaded gas, not avgas.
    The prices, again, need to be checked by anyone using this video as a guide.

  • @nimrodsmusic
    @nimrodsmusic Před rokem

    You have a voice meant for silent movies

  • @JohnBaileyDarke
    @JohnBaileyDarke Před 3 lety

    The Panthera is not in production nor has it received FAA certification. Do your homework.

  • @markhindle4472
    @markhindle4472 Před 3 lety +2

    Surprised you did not include the Navion out of production.. since 1972 . these have been altered to get to 220 mph and use about 17 gallons an hour. You may find one for about 12k not flying or less than 100k totally tricked out.

  • @humbertomonteiro6742
    @humbertomonteiro6742 Před 2 lety

    Diamonds, Diamonds are the besttttttttttt

  • @larseriksson1184
    @larseriksson1184 Před 3 lety

    Why bother converting between knots and mph ? Maybe some planes fly in mph and some only in knots.

    • @itubesify
      @itubesify Před 3 lety

      Because knots an nautical miles are those units which are commonly used in civil aviation (I don’t know for sure about military aviation, but I suggest it’s the same here); although ICAO recommends using kilometers and kilometers per hour.

  • @skycop56
    @skycop56 Před rokem

    SR 22 s pushing a million bucks!

  • @muhammadsteinberg
    @muhammadsteinberg Před 3 lety +1

    You are not going to get 4 adults with full fuel and travel 900 miles in a 172. Total nonsense. You're doing good if you can squeeze out 600-700 miles.
    If I fill up I got approx 500lbs left for myself and whatever. Thats normal category. If I fly utility it's 200lbs. But I'd never fill tanks if I intentionally plan on utility flying.

  • @brianfoster769
    @brianfoster769 Před 3 lety

    You position is skewed. Only true if want to haul that load

  • @alexdarcydestsimon3767

    Aviators around the World have an agreement on using knots.
    Why do you go for f...g mph ? Means nothing outside british countries.
    Then use only legal measurements :
    Kmph and celcius degrees. :-)

  • @meier259
    @meier259 Před 9 měsíci

    Only 450,000$ no biggie..

  • @misa7598
    @misa7598 Před 3 lety

    1900th like

  • @samueldormervil
    @samueldormervil Před 2 lety

    How much? Four hundred and fifty thousand dawers

  • @speedomars
    @speedomars Před 3 lety +2

    Your list is a mess. TTX, Evolution, and Mooney are no longer made. The Panthera is not certified and is a retractable with an anemic speed. The top are all Cirrus. SR20, SR22 and SR22T and the sales numbers prove it. The SR22T cruises at 200ktas at 18gph.

    • @speedomars
      @speedomars Před 3 lety

      @Biggus Dickus The DA42 is superseded by the DA62, both twins, Astro diesel (Jet-A), retractable, nice planes, but pricey. The Tecnam P2006T is also a twin but with Rotax 912 engines...overpriced, under-powered, low quality. The Quest Kodiak, Cessna Caravan and Pilatus Turbo Porter are in the same class. The Porter is older but an astounding aircraft (even if you get one used). The Quest is smaller and carries less but only has a 700 foot runway need. The Caravan is the big boy in this class. The Pilatus PC-12 is a monster aircraft...it does carry a lot of cargo, but it also seats 10...it is really a small charter, commuter or business turbo-prob like the TBM.

    • @gringoloco8576
      @gringoloco8576 Před 3 lety

      Mooney is still in production. The factory has been reopened. I got parts for my Mooney from them this week.

    • @speedomars
      @speedomars Před 3 lety

      @@gringoloco8576 Mooney cut production staff to the bare minimum to make your parts. But they are not selling planes.

    • @skipdreadman8765
      @skipdreadman8765 Před 3 lety

      Make your own list. This one is his. 🙄

  • @peterwilhelmsson4168
    @peterwilhelmsson4168 Před 3 lety +4

    Who in the market to purchase an airplane uses mph and miles? It's knots and nautical miles!

    • @stoneyislandranch9783
      @stoneyislandranch9783 Před 3 lety +4

      Not everyone can afford an airplane .. some people are just enthusiast.. and appreciate the conversions.. it's the pilots who know how to convert the numbers because we use them.. don't be a turd

    • @iotolaofrocknrolla2795
      @iotolaofrocknrolla2795 Před rokem

      It's nautical miles and knots if you're a pretentious Dbag.

  • @officiallilel889
    @officiallilel889 Před 3 lety +3

    I'm only 14 can you do one that teenagers can fly

  • @iotolaofrocknrolla2795

    Great video thanks. Don't listen to all the euro trash and wanna be pilots on here. It's fine to use mph and Gallons.

  • @golffit3066
    @golffit3066 Před 3 lety

    People that spend upwards of $500,000 don't give a rats ass about burn rate! Mine burns 13.6 gph and I couldn't care less

  • @markcampbell7577
    @markcampbell7577 Před 3 lety +3

    The lowest fuel consumption for an airplane would be an edison generator electric power with high torque electric motor. This is unlimited flight. No fuel.

    • @sircrapalot9954
      @sircrapalot9954 Před 2 lety +2

      Lol “unlimited flight?” What are you smoking?

    • @fowyb
      @fowyb Před rokem

      Gonna need a VERY long power lead...😂

  • @jppalm3944
    @jppalm3944 Před rokem

    Prices for new, way off.
    Much much higher

  • @engelcrona
    @engelcrona Před 3 lety

    Ok...i gotta know where the narrator is from? That accent and pronounciation is inscrutable.

  • @Double835
    @Double835 Před 3 lety +4

    These numbers are laughable!!!!

    • @Dwaynesaviation
      @Dwaynesaviation  Před 3 lety +1

      What numbers?

    • @Double835
      @Double835 Před 3 lety +2

      @@Dwaynesaviation cessna 172 useful load and purchase prices!!!

    • @Dwaynesaviation
      @Dwaynesaviation  Před 3 lety

      Exact price depends on the option you chose.. You can reach out with the sales representative nearest to you for exact prices, the prices in our video are the list Price.

    • @Double835
      @Double835 Před 3 lety +1

      @@Dwaynesaviation I'm talking about useful load, amount of people, fuel and range. I fly these everyday btw. You cannot put full fuel and more than 3 people without bags

    • @fireball676
      @fireball676 Před 3 lety +1

      @@Dwaynesaviation i wouldnt get in a 172 with more than 2 other people. Engines vary on maintenance too. They dont have the power to get you out of a bad situation. I honestly dont like flying them if i can avoid it. Super slow, not fuel efficient at those speeds.

  • @ABC-rh7zc
    @ABC-rh7zc Před 3 lety +2

    I'm getting tired of these compilation video with zero new content and fake voiceovers.

  • @captainpegs0740
    @captainpegs0740 Před 2 lety

    What is the accent?

  • @ralphhubbell
    @ralphhubbell Před 3 lety +2

    Stop with the computer voice overs. They are tremendously annoying!

  • @donnborden1423
    @donnborden1423 Před rokem

    "Miles-per-hour" has no place in aviation.

  • @jerryclemens4880
    @jerryclemens4880 Před 3 lety

    Bonanza

  • @mattivirta
    @mattivirta Před 3 lety

    i not understand why some seller lie and scame customer lot, same plane size same materials same engine one cost 100 000 $ and totally same copy plane cost 500 000 $ totally stupid pay 500 000 same size plane.

  • @johnyoungs7453
    @johnyoungs7453 Před rokem

    How about leave out these "$500K-$1mil" airplanes?? Who the fuck can afford these things..?? Get real..!!

  • @michaelbruton2979
    @michaelbruton2979 Před 2 lety

    The opening comments blew the credibility for this video......a plane that burns 20 gallons per hour at 300 mph is not more efficient than a plane that burns 8 gallons per hour at 200mph. WTH? The first one burns 40 gallons in 600 miles and the second one burns 24 gallons in 600 miles. If you are going to make videos about aviation, own a calculator. Much of aviation requires math. It takes an hour longer on a 600 mile trip however the slower plane is more efficient.

    • @Dwaynesaviation
      @Dwaynesaviation  Před 2 lety +1

      Useful load is also factored in... Not just fuel burn and speed... But I think you only copied that part that'll make it okay to come troll me in comment section... I don't think it's nice...

  • @globalroamer1900
    @globalroamer1900 Před 2 lety

    I love watching Censortube

  • @cellokid5104
    @cellokid5104 Před 3 lety +1

    The fact that you put a cirrus on here, shows that this video about "efficiency" is worth nothing

  • @Capt483
    @Capt483 Před 3 lety

    anything costing more than 150k is priced to fail. these machines are Toy. The maker just pretend to forget this during pricing. for business, there are businesses jet.

  • @wanderleyapparecidovieira2282

    For god sake,ashame on you Money, ancient throttle system ,push pull rod? Spent a little engineering time to actualize it !

  • @rileyswing9731
    @rileyswing9731 Před 3 lety

    But.. we put perform all of these platforms. No respect for the canards 😔

  • @superwag634
    @superwag634 Před 3 lety

    whats that voice all about? made me turn off your show

  • @jasonweiss2773
    @jasonweiss2773 Před rokem

    The Tecnam 2006t has a great power to weight ratio? If you say so. .07hp per pound. (According to Wikipedia) that is abysmal.

  • @coffee838
    @coffee838 Před 5 měsíci

    ONLY HALF A MIL LOOK HOW AFFORDABLE
    lol, brain damage

  • @bobby061202
    @bobby061202 Před 3 lety +5

    How much is av gas?

    • @nichooo6423
      @nichooo6423 Před 3 lety +2

      i think he said $6 dollar per gallon

    • @jared123123
      @jared123123 Před 3 lety +1

      ^ strong feeling the op of this section was making a crack at him saying the same at gas price of $6 Every two minutes.
      Nice video but probably could of shaved 5 minutes off by just saying at the start “this will be all based on av gas being $6/ gallon and skipping that part after.

    • @nichooo6423
      @nichooo6423 Před 3 lety

      @@jared123123 yeah true actually