Absolutely, just a simple helium balloon discredits the entire theory of gravity. Helium or hydrogen weren't even discovered when Newton came up with his flawed theory of gravity 😲@@MathieusTheWalkingWitness
Lol Newton proposed "what goes up must come down" and "mass attracts mass" around 1666... Helium (has mass and NEVER goes down) was discovered in 1868... There is no universal law of gravity attraction, cause a simple gas such as helium, debunks that allegedly claimes "law"... i highly suggest you go watch Richard Feynman lecture about how laws of nature are discovered... "If it (your theory) disagrees with experiment, it (your theory) is wrong" --Richard Feynman Once again, dropping a helium balloon (both have mass) disagrees with the proposal of "mass attracts mass"...
Newtons The falling of the apple hinted at the force of attraction. And the thought of the attracter came after having seen the apple fallen on the ground. So the idea came to the mind that the earth has got the power of attraction. And when he saw the apple coming down, he realised the force of repulsion. And as a matter of fact any one of them is quite sufficient to bring it down. Then, what for two are required? IN “Hadayiq-un-Najum, it is said: If a bullet is fired on the equal level it will go in straight line, following its own nature. This hints at the force of repulsion.
Hi Sabins, can I get your permission to use your wonderful video in my teaching Newton's gravitaiotnal law to my Tibetan viewers? I will surely mention copyright and your youtube link thought the viewers might not be able to follow the links as CZcams is blocked in CHINA.
Lol Newton proposed "what goes up must come down" and "mass attracts mass" around 1666... Helium (has mass and NEVER goes down) was discovered in 1868... There is no universal law of gravity attraction, cause a simple gas such as helium, debunks that allegedly claimes "law"... i highly suggest you go watch Richard Feynman lecture about how laws of nature are discovered... "If it (your theory) disagrees with experiment, it (your theory) is wrong" --Richard Feynman Once again, dropping a helium balloon (both have mass) disagrees with the proposal of "mass attracts mass"...
This was really awesome Sabin Sir I thank you for making such interesting and useful videos Hope you will once explain working of a fan and working of TV (all types) Regards
The Life-Desire is the Force or Motor of Life. In direct Extension We have Will (Life-Side) and Gravity (Stuff-Side) By our Will, We do Balance Gravity of Earth, with our own, when We lift the cup. Tide is caused by the slightly Slinger of Earths rotation. So, Will is Life-Power, Gravity is Stuff-Power.
The lever using a horizontal scale is replaced by ripples from a very high energy top quark in the nucleus of each atom. Rest is identical. Laws to keep are that a convex interactive surface is positive ➕. A concave interactive surface is negative. Each time waves cut, there is an attractive force bringing the bodies together due to the negative surface interaction. Photons are positive in interaction causing displacement, dispersion and expansion.
The experiment shown in the beginning of the video was conducted by Henry Cavendish to calculate the value of Gravitational constant, which is 6.67×10^-11 Nm²/kg². Also, if the effect of gravity on smaller bodies is able to be shown just by suspending two small balls on a horizontal bar, then why isn't the effect of gravity shown elsewhere like this?
It's difficult to show the effect of gravity on smaller objects else where because of opposing forces like gravitational pull from other objects, friction, air resistance and much more other counter acting forces. "That's why Cavendish suspended the balls on a horizontal bar to eliminate friction and put it in a wooden box to try and eliminate other forces as well. We haven't done this elsewhere because it's difficult to eliminate the other opposing forces perfectly.
@@ovidius2000 That's erroneous and stupid. I myself in my physics degree did the Cavendish experiment, as every physics student does. It has been redone thousands if not millions of times. You can't go to the moon without a Saturn V, and we made only about 20 of them and used them all. Now we are building new rockets to do it again. Ditch your stupid handle and go study Science!!
Cavendish recognised that heat is a factor to cause his torsion balance to move. Imo nobody can achieve thermal equilibrium within their torsion balance because one cannot determine that the centre of a large lead ball is at the same temperature as the centre of a small lead ball. The same can be said with all other pieces of the apparatus especially if they are made with different materials, e.g. wood for the beam. Observing the torsion balance swing around slightly and putting the causation of that movement down to gravitational attraction is a great idea but one has to prove it is because of gravitational attraction and not just attraction of masses due to differentials in heat or perhaps some other unknown explanation. All Cavendish proved was that he had a vivid imagination!!! That's unsurprising though given he had lots of money, never married or had children, ate the same meal every day for most of his life and didn't like his portrait sketched or painted.
Tudo muito bem explicado. Mas que tipo de força é a gravidade??? Elétrica, Magnética, nuclear, mecânica, alguem sabe dizer??????? Nem Isaac newton saberia.
Wonder if any tried the hanging ball test in a vacuum chamber to take out the "air pressure" factor that many people that deny gravity or the earth's rotation use as a red herring,
Gravitational field & energy contained in gravitational field exist in space around & b/w mass bearing objects. What is source of gravitational energy? Does gravitational field borrow its energy from space since there is nothing else there except Space. Is space an energy field?
In general, the simplest form of object positioning around another object in space is spheroidal positioning. Just like Electrons around nuclear in atom , But why do the planets in the solar system form a disc around the sun?
I haven't a doubt....!! You said that every body attract each other due to force of attarction but where does this force come from a Ideal body....? Waiting for the Answer :)
Very good explanation I have a question :- we know that if we have 3 unknown values in an equation we need 3 equations to solve the problem & find the solution..... I will clearify the question the 3 unknown values in Newton's gravitational law (f=G×m1. m2 /r2) are the G gravitational constant.... m2 mass of the earth.... And r the earth radius So if we put 3 different weights (m1) three times & by computation of the gravitational force (f) each time and because we know (m1) so we can figure out the other 3 values (G.... m2.... r) Is my English good?
Your English is good enough for me to understand approximately what you have in mind, but your question is incomplete. Think carefully about what information you know, and what information you want to find. Without knowing specifically what information is given, I can't help you.
Not only a theory, that's the thing how actually things work.... According to Newton's 2nd law of motion, F=Ma M=F/a Now, we know that Apple and Earth pulls each other with equal force. Earth Mass is much much greater than the mass of Apple. If the Mass is higher then the acceleration becomes lower, As Mass and acceleration are inversely proportional to each other. Earth Mass is much much higher than the Apple's Mass, So Earth's acceleration towards apple will become approx Zero. That's why Earth doesn't moves towards apple, only apple moves towards earth....
@@HarshaHarshG-tb3pu Ok, give me your take on how gravity causes acceleration between masses? Traditionally it’s the radius adjusting it, but…why and how does this measurement really do the deed? I have a hypothesis as to how it works, but would like to see if you have something different first.
You have to think in terms of Inertia. Basically Earth have more Inertia than Apple, As Inertia and Mass are Directly proportional to each other. Inertia is like Laziness, Earth doesn't want to move towards apple as Earth Mass is greater than the Apple's Mass. Only Apple moves towards the Earth.
Gravity=intermass action with planck scale space time warping. Unlike some kinds of electromagnetic radiation, Gravity doesn’t peek at you from behind other masses. Line of sight force only.
When you are falling there are no forces acting on you. Its not till something acts to push you away from your gravitationally determined path that you experience a force. The curve of space time is so severe near our planets surface that it requires 9.8m/s of force to push you away from the equilibrium state in that curved space. The curve of spacetime determines your path. Its really counter intuitive but we are like the fish who are trying to understand water. This leads to some stuff that is really weird when you first hear about it , like orbits being a strait line. They make a lot more sense after it sinks in for a while.
Lol Newton proposed "what goes up must come down" and "mass attracts mass" around 1666... Helium (has mass and NEVER goes down) was discovered in 1868... There is no universal law of gravity attraction, cause a simple gas such as helium, debunks that allegedly claimes "law"... i highly suggest you go watch Richard Feynman lecture about how laws of nature are discovered... "If it (your theory) disagrees with experiment, it (your theory) is wrong" --Richard Feynman Once again, dropping a helium balloon (both have mass) disagrees with the proposal of "mass attracts mass"...
Sir mera question hai ki Agar ham dono pindo ki bich ki duri ko aadhi kar de to bal yani F kitna Guna ghat jayega ya kitna Guna bhad jayega f=g*m1*m2/(d/2)^2
Long time ago people find, that earth is not ideal sphere, and even centre of the mass is not fixed. In simple words directions of gravity will not intersect in the same point (centar of the earth), or vertical will not be vertical but declined for some part of the second.
Since Gravitation has now been shown to be fictitious and appears as a force only because of space time curvature, how does this experiment work? Is the large mass warping space so the smaller balls move towards it?
pretty much with one minor change.. both masses are warping space/time & both masses are trying to move toward each other.. just the small mass is freely allowed to move.
Lol Newton proposed "what goes up must come down" and "mass attracts mass" around 1666... Helium (has mass and NEVER goes down) was discovered in 1868... There is no universal law of gravity attraction, cause a simple gas such as helium, debunks that allegedly claimes "law"... i highly suggest you go watch Richard Feynman lecture about how laws of nature are discovered... "If it (your theory) disagrees with experiment, it (your theory) is wrong" --Richard Feynman Once again, dropping a helium balloon (both have mass) disagrees with the proposal of "mass attracts mass"...
Bhaskaracharya described gravity in the context of a geocentric model, not a heliocentric one. He does not seem to have concluded that the Sun, Moon, etc. also have gravity, ascribing it as a property of the Earth. He did not create any mathematical description of how gravity works
gravity, acording to general relativity, is the distortion of space-time that is created by any mass. gravitational force is, well, the force that is exerted on any object near a gravitational field. this can be calculated with the formula given in the video. gravitational accelerations is, again, the acceleration an object adquires when in free fall inside a gravitational field.
This video has really motivated me to be more focused on physics as our teacher is going to start laws of motion chapter.
Absent yourself from that school and think for yourself.
@@TheBlueScarecrow 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@@TheBlueScarecrow 😂😅😅
In these experiments how are the different forms of magnesium controlled for?
@@arshpreetsinghplays99o in
This video is really beneficial 👍👍👍👍👍👍
marvellous animation and visual for grasping concepts so easily.
Helpful visual.🙏🤩
What a great work sir. Appreciate it very much. Please ...make more videos like this ..
Sir I request you to make a detailed video on all the Laws of Motion and Laws of Inertia of Sir Issac Newton with detailed explanation with examples
Outstanding sir.
Excellent video!
Your videos explain very well concepts in more clear than most channel on CZcams.
Keep up your work mate!
yup the universal law of gravitation is only an IDEA!
@@PeterPetenot to mention a helium balloon debunks the IDEA that mass attracts mass...
Absolutely, just a simple helium balloon discredits the entire theory of gravity. Helium or hydrogen weren't even discovered when Newton came up with his flawed theory of gravity 😲@@MathieusTheWalkingWitness
In these experiments how are the different forms of magnesium controlled for?
Thank you .Awesome video😀
Wonderful explanation
Understand well... thank you 🍃
Excellent video....
Good informative video 👍🏻
Muito bom o seu vídeo! 😀
Good explanation and animations 😊
Very good. Thanks 🙏🙏🙏🙏
thanks for the video
Just Wow. I have never thought physics like this.❤
Very nice and great animation
Awesome! 👏🏻👏🏻
Upsetting that the video had to come to an end as you did a great job putting it together
This video wasu very important to me it really helped me to understand this lesson very well
you are a great explainer dude
Great effort❤️❤️
wonderful video which was explained clearly with good animations. Thank you ...
Lol Newton proposed "what goes up must come down" and "mass attracts mass" around 1666... Helium (has mass and NEVER goes down) was discovered in 1868...
There is no universal law of gravity attraction, cause a simple gas such as helium, debunks that allegedly claimes "law"... i highly suggest you go watch Richard Feynman lecture about how laws of nature are discovered...
"If it (your theory) disagrees with experiment, it (your theory) is wrong"
--Richard Feynman
Once again, dropping a helium balloon (both have mass) disagrees with the proposal of "mass attracts mass"...
Great sir
Such an amazing explanation. Loved it✨
Newtons The falling of the apple
hinted at the force of attraction. And the thought of the
attracter came after having seen the apple fallen on the
ground. So the idea came to the mind that the earth has got
the power of attraction. And when he saw the apple coming
down, he realised the force of repulsion. And as a matter of
fact any one of them is quite sufficient to bring it down.
Then, what for two are required? IN “Hadayiq-un-Najum,
it is said: If a bullet is fired on the equal level it will go in
straight line, following its own nature. This hints at the
force of repulsion.
Keep making this kind of videos.
Nice explanation please we need more
Thank you sir!
Wow😱😲 manificent explanation Sir ji 🌻💐💝🤓⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐💯💯😊✌️ and thank you Sir ji for make a this awesome videos 🙏👍😊
Please make a tutorial to explain how to make this animation. May i know the name of software used for making this animation.thank you.
This absolutely beautiful
Super explanation
Very nice 👍👍👍👍👍
Wonderful
Hi Sabins,
can I get your permission to use your wonderful video in my teaching Newton's gravitaiotnal law to my Tibetan viewers? I will surely mention copyright and your youtube link thought the viewers might not be able to follow the links as CZcams is blocked in CHINA.
I'm inspired by this content. A similar book I read served as a transformational guide. "Galaxies United" by Olivia Whitestone
Best video
Good illustration
Amazing
Wow.Thanks a lot sir.What a great explanation. 😊
Interesting 😎
Intriguing! Mega ultra!
Terrific.
I have seen lots videos but this one was really good 👍👍
Alrighty
Lol Newton proposed "what goes up must come down" and "mass attracts mass" around 1666... Helium (has mass and NEVER goes down) was discovered in 1868...
There is no universal law of gravity attraction, cause a simple gas such as helium, debunks that allegedly claimes "law"... i highly suggest you go watch Richard Feynman lecture about how laws of nature are discovered...
"If it (your theory) disagrees with experiment, it (your theory) is wrong"
--Richard Feynman
Once again, dropping a helium balloon (both have mass) disagrees with the proposal of "mass attracts mass"...
what happens if you place the large orbs on the same side of the smaller suspended orbs - they'd 'cancel' each other out ? Just curious ..
Thanks sir....
Salute sir
Thank you so much🤩
Thank you ❤❤
** SABINS ** .,. Sabins .,. Simply GREAT! Thank YOU!
Thank you.
This vedio tell us more than our teacher tell us😊😊
This was really awesome Sabin Sir
I thank you for making such interesting and useful videos
Hope you will once explain working of a fan and working of TV (all types)
Regards
Tt
Nice❤❤❤
In these experiments how are the different forms of magnetism controlled for?
The Life-Desire is the Force or Motor of Life.
In direct Extension We have Will (Life-Side)
and Gravity (Stuff-Side)
By our Will, We do Balance Gravity of Earth,
with our own, when We lift the cup.
Tide is caused by the slightly Slinger of Earths rotation.
So, Will is Life-Power,
Gravity is Stuff-Power.
Finally, thanks to this video i can finally stop floating and walk on the ground for the first time in my life
Wow, what software have you used to make this animation?
eye cathing video❤
How much time it takes for the small ball to touch the big ball?
The lever using a horizontal scale is replaced by ripples from a very high energy top quark in the nucleus of each atom. Rest is identical.
Laws to keep are that a convex interactive surface is positive ➕. A concave interactive surface is negative. Each time waves cut, there is an attractive force bringing the bodies together due to the negative surface interaction. Photons are positive in interaction causing displacement, dispersion and expansion.
Explain more please
Thank you
The experiment shown in the beginning of the video was conducted by Henry Cavendish to calculate the value of Gravitational constant, which is 6.67×10^-11 Nm²/kg².
Also, if the effect of gravity on smaller bodies is able to be shown just by suspending two small balls on a horizontal bar, then why isn't the effect of gravity shown elsewhere like this?
It's difficult to show the effect of gravity on smaller objects else where because of opposing forces like gravitational pull from other objects, friction, air resistance and much more other counter acting forces. "That's why Cavendish suspended the balls on a horizontal bar to eliminate friction and put it in a wooden box to try and eliminate other forces as well. We haven't done this elsewhere because it's difficult to eliminate the other opposing forces perfectly.
@@noredem that's a nice explanation of the experiment, well done and thank you!
@@noredem SoCavendish'sExperimentCannotBeReplicated?ThisIsTheSameStuffLike:WeWentToTheMoonButNowWeCannotGoAnymore.
@@ovidius2000
That's erroneous and stupid. I myself in my physics degree did the Cavendish experiment, as every physics student does. It has been redone thousands if not millions of times. You can't go to the moon without a Saturn V, and we made only about 20 of them and used them all. Now we are building new rockets to do it again. Ditch your stupid handle and go study Science!!
Cavendish recognised that heat is a factor to cause his torsion balance to move. Imo nobody can achieve thermal equilibrium within their torsion balance because one cannot determine that the centre of a large lead ball is at the same temperature as the centre of a small lead ball. The same can be said with all other pieces of the apparatus especially if they are made with different materials, e.g. wood for the beam.
Observing the torsion balance swing around slightly and putting the causation of that movement down to gravitational attraction is a great idea but one has to prove it is because of gravitational attraction and not just attraction of masses due to differentials in heat or perhaps some other unknown explanation.
All Cavendish proved was that he had a vivid imagination!!! That's unsurprising though given he had lots of money, never married or had children, ate the same meal every day for most of his life and didn't like his portrait sketched or painted.
Thank❤ you🌹
How did henry calculated it, pls i really want to know
Tudo muito bem explicado. Mas que tipo de força é a gravidade??? Elétrica, Magnética, nuclear, mecânica, alguem sabe dizer??????? Nem Isaac newton saberia.
😮😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅well information good show you 😅😅
Can you plz explain the friction force
Is this use for gravity presentation
By the way nice video 😊
And the beauty that Coloumb's Electrostatic force is exact analogous to gravitational force
Yeah, the Beauty of Physics.....
Wonder if any tried the hanging ball test in a vacuum chamber to take out the "air pressure" factor that many people that deny gravity or the earth's rotation use as a red herring,
Theory of relativity 🔥
Hats off to you. What an excellent explanation. It helped my son very clearly. Please kindly do many more videos
Also sir Issac Newton never have said that of the central attraction but someone else of Apple Force.
Gravitational field & energy contained in gravitational field exist in space around & b/w mass bearing objects. What is source of gravitational energy? Does gravitational field borrow its energy from space since there is nothing else there except Space. Is space an energy field?
In general, the simplest form of object positioning around another object in space is spheroidal positioning. Just like Electrons around nuclear in atom , But why do the planets in the solar system form a disc around the sun?
I haven't a doubt....!! You said that every body attract each other due to force of attarction but where does this force come from a Ideal body....?
Waiting for the Answer :)
Gravitational field appears in space. Is it part of space or Mass which induces it.
Thanks
Very good explanation
I have a question :- we know that if we have 3 unknown values in an equation we need 3 equations to solve the problem & find the solution..... I will clearify the question the 3 unknown values in Newton's gravitational law (f=G×m1. m2 /r2) are the G gravitational constant.... m2 mass of the earth.... And r the earth radius
So if we put 3 different weights (m1) three times & by computation of the gravitational force (f) each time and because we know (m1) so we can figure out the other 3 values
(G.... m2.... r)
Is my English good?
Your English is good enough for me to understand approximately what you have in mind, but your question is incomplete. Think carefully about what information you know, and what information you want to find. Without knowing specifically what information is given, I can't help you.
No, because every time you change m1, then F also changes... and you thus end up with a new value for the equation.
Don’t forget planets above us, they also should impact any object on the Earth.
How long to wait for the experience described in the beginning
Nice narration..!! Apple pulls the earth.. quite a theory
Not only a theory, that's the thing how actually things work....
According to Newton's 2nd law of motion, F=Ma
M=F/a
Now, we know that Apple and Earth pulls each other with equal force.
Earth Mass is much much greater than the mass of Apple.
If the Mass is higher then the acceleration becomes lower, As Mass and acceleration are inversely proportional to each other.
Earth Mass is much much higher than the Apple's Mass, So Earth's acceleration towards apple will become approx Zero. That's why Earth doesn't moves towards apple, only apple moves towards earth....
@@HarshaHarshG-tb3pu Ok, give me your take on how gravity causes acceleration between masses? Traditionally it’s the radius adjusting it, but…why and how does this measurement really do the deed? I have a hypothesis as to how it works, but would like to see if you have something different first.
@@starventure Aree kahana kya Chahte ho....!!
@@starventure I didn't get what you said.
Can you elaborate your Comment plz.
You have to think in terms of Inertia. Basically Earth have more Inertia than Apple, As Inertia and Mass are Directly proportional to each other. Inertia is like Laziness, Earth doesn't want to move towards apple as Earth Mass is greater than the Apple's Mass.
Only Apple moves towards the Earth.
This is what I learnt in school in the 1950s.....but my head is spinning from theories that Gravity is NOT a force.
Gravity=intermass action with planck scale space time warping. Unlike some kinds of electromagnetic radiation, Gravity doesn’t peek at you from behind other masses. Line of sight force only.
Space Time trampolin is NOT correct reason for gravitational motion we observe.
When you are falling there are no forces acting on you. Its not till something acts to push you away from your gravitationally determined path that you experience a force. The curve of space time is so severe near our planets surface that it requires 9.8m/s of force to push you away from the equilibrium state in that curved space. The curve of spacetime determines your path. Its really counter intuitive but we are like the fish who are trying to understand water. This leads to some stuff that is really weird when you first hear about it , like orbits being a strait line. They make a lot more sense after it sinks in for a while.
Lol Newton proposed "what goes up must come down" and "mass attracts mass" around 1666... Helium (has mass and NEVER goes down) was discovered in 1868...
There is no universal law of gravity attraction, cause a simple gas such as helium, debunks that allegedly claimes "law"... i highly suggest you go watch Richard Feynman lecture about how laws of nature are discovered...
"If it (your theory) disagrees with experiment, it (your theory) is wrong"
--Richard Feynman
Once again, dropping a helium balloon (both have mass) disagrees with the proposal of "mass attracts mass"...
how to measure of earth centre
i like it
thank you I hope to translate this video into Arabic and the other languages your watcher from egypt
I also convince that Isaac Newton is incredible .
Sir mera question hai ki
Agar ham dono pindo ki bich ki duri ko aadhi kar de to bal yani F kitna Guna ghat jayega ya kitna Guna bhad jayega
f=g*m1*m2/(d/2)^2
And what matter is in the Centre of any body...that is required to be researched ☺️
What are you trying to say....?!
Can you plz elaborate.....!!
Long time ago people find, that earth is not ideal sphere, and even centre of the mass is not fixed. In simple words directions of gravity will not intersect in the same point (centar of the earth), or vertical will not be vertical but declined for some part of the second.
Wow..i knew here better❤
Finally 👍👍
Since Gravitation has now been shown to be fictitious and appears as a force only because of space time curvature, how does this experiment work? Is the large mass warping space so the smaller balls move towards it?
pretty much with one minor change.. both masses are warping space/time & both masses are trying to move toward each other.. just the small mass is freely allowed to move.
Lol Newton proposed "what goes up must come down" and "mass attracts mass" around 1666... Helium (has mass and NEVER goes down) was discovered in 1868...
There is no universal law of gravity attraction, cause a simple gas such as helium, debunks that allegedly claimes "law"... i highly suggest you go watch Richard Feynman lecture about how laws of nature are discovered...
"If it (your theory) disagrees with experiment, it (your theory) is wrong"
--Richard Feynman
Once again, dropping a helium balloon (both have mass) disagrees with the proposal of "mass attracts mass"...
Great Mathematician Bhaskaracharya discovered Gravity and Laws of Motion centuries before Sir Isaac Newton
Bhaskaracharya described gravity in the context of a geocentric model, not a heliocentric one. He does not seem to have concluded that the Sun, Moon, etc. also have gravity, ascribing it as a property of the Earth. He did not create any mathematical description of how gravity works
Jai Hind jai Bharat 🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳
Pls guide me, what is actually the difference between the gravity, gravitational force, and the gravitational acceleration??
gravity, acording to general relativity, is the distortion of space-time that is created by any mass.
gravitational force is, well, the force that is exerted on any object near a gravitational field. this can be calculated with the formula given in the video.
gravitational accelerations is, again, the acceleration an object adquires when in free fall inside a gravitational field.