Exactly! Now how do we use our heads to make what we want in our hearts to happen? it's so easy for most of us already in peace, but to many others, they are at a state of huge imposition, such as being occupied. How do we change minds of occupiers?
Heh heh, I take it that's a cliche going around? It's certainly true people repeat each others' statements to build consensus, enthusiasm, and familiarity and comfort. And at the same time I see it lead to repeating things to the point where they lose some of their meaning and power. So I'm glad I'm just a little bit out of the mainstream and hopefully my perspective and statements will kick some fresh energy into this story. In fact: the entire attack on university professors is a *distraction* from the actual war and from the actual occupation. We need to swing the spotlight back over to the occupiers and find a way to enforce justice that is expected everywhere else in the world out of fundamental dignity and support of the humans who were put into this situation. And this goes not only to the occupiers but the settlers who are told by their government to violate others' rights, and to the occupying government who were told by the British 75 years ago that they could be there. Maybe we even need to punish Britain? Point is, we have two groups occupying each other's space and we need to get them thriving instead of harming. Therefore: TWO STATE SOLUTION.
Oh I don't know about a cliche, I was just reacting to the idiotic fallout I see from that hearing. They seem to be getting railroaded for daring to say that university policies on the limits of free speech take context into account. I mean WTF year is this.
Peace! that means NO MORE WAR!!! 😆
Exactly! Now how do we use our heads to make what we want in our hearts to happen? it's so easy for most of us already in peace, but to many others, they are at a state of huge imposition, such as being occupied. How do we change minds of occupiers?
It doesn't count cause you forgot to say "I don't like genocide" /s
Heh heh, I take it that's a cliche going around? It's certainly true people repeat each others' statements to build consensus, enthusiasm, and familiarity and comfort. And at the same time I see it lead to repeating things to the point where they lose some of their meaning and power. So I'm glad I'm just a little bit out of the mainstream and hopefully my perspective and statements will kick some fresh energy into this story.
In fact: the entire attack on university professors is a *distraction* from the actual war and from the actual occupation. We need to swing the spotlight back over to the occupiers and find a way to enforce justice that is expected everywhere else in the world out of fundamental dignity and support of the humans who were put into this situation. And this goes not only to the occupiers but the settlers who are told by their government to violate others' rights, and to the occupying government who were told by the British 75 years ago that they could be there. Maybe we even need to punish Britain? Point is, we have two groups occupying each other's space and we need to get them thriving instead of harming.
Therefore: TWO STATE SOLUTION.
Oh I don't know about a cliche, I was just reacting to the idiotic fallout I see from that hearing. They seem to be getting railroaded for daring to say that university policies on the limits of free speech take context into account. I mean WTF year is this.