Will Nupur Sharma Be Able To Do Away With The Cases Against Her? | Prophet Row | Converse India

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 12. 08. 2022
  • In this episode of Converse India with Rahul Shivshankar, we will discuss the controversy that evolved after Supreme Court's decision to grant interim relief to Nupur Sharma, but its denial to hear the case that revolved around Sharma's 1st July remarks against Prophet Mohammed. Meanwhile, several of the experts are of the view that due to the observation that was made by the Supreme Court, Nupur Sharma's case will be impacted when the High Court starts its hearing. Speaking on the same, author Anand Ranganathan said, "After SC's remarks (against Nupur Sharma), half a dozen people have been brutally attacked just for supporting Nupur. Who will take responsibility for that? Who will apologize? Who will be held accountable?."
    Watch to know more!
    #nupursharma #supremecourt #prophetmohammedrow
    Times Now - Times Now News channel examines news with in-depth analysis. We provide much more than the latest news and breaking news of the day. Times Network houses upscale television channels.
    Times Network takes the lead with its ground-breaking innovation and disruption of a new content category. The Times Network channels, which have a global footprint in 100 countries, inform, entertain, and engage viewers of all ages with fascinating and intriguing content, news, and information.
    Subscribe to our channel - bit.ly/SubscribeToTimesNow
    Check out our website: www.timesnownews.com
    Times Now News App : bit.ly/3AD5qqN
    Connect with us on our social media handles:
    Facebook: / timesnow
    Twitter: / timesnow
    Instagram: / timesnow
    Subscribe to our other network channels:
    Times Now Navbharat: bit.ly/SubscribeToTNNavbharat
    Zoom: bit.ly/SubscribeToZoom
    Mirror Now: bit.ly/SubscribeToMirrorNow
    ET Now: bit.ly/SubscribeToETNow
    TN+: bit.ly/SubscribeToTNPlus
    Pushed via Slike

Komentáře • 171

  • @nagendranshanmugam239
    @nagendranshanmugam239 Před rokem +19

    You are simply fantastic Rahulji. May God bless you to anchor another 1,00,000 episodes for the benefit of your viewers.

  • @nagarajreddy5484
    @nagarajreddy5484 Před rokem +19

    Actually feel sad for the judges of the system .. they themselves are scared to provide a proper judgement…. Strongly feel they must quit from the system 😞😞

    • @duckwalkerindian4689
      @duckwalkerindian4689 Před rokem

      yes becos thugs like Kapil Sibil r disguised as lawyers today n d Judges r scared of him n his gang that if they disobey them d repacrusion would b something they won't b able to handle....if d judges r in this gangs good books their career is safe

  • @maheshthakur3741
    @maheshthakur3741 Před rokem +9

    The judges guilty of going above the law &
    above the constitution with their unwarranted statements & behavior
    must be impeached
    For the dignity & sanctity of our judiciary

  • @ramachandran-gm9ds
    @ramachandran-gm9ds Před rokem +17

    Why so-called SC judges who made harsh comments on Nupur Sharma without to avail natural justice that made a lot of killings for supporting nupur.have not dismissed.These two judges are responsible for nupur supporters.These judges are also accused people. Dr.Rahmahnia should be charged for his comments on Shivlingh . This hurted on Hindu sentiments

  • @eleazergatphoh8313
    @eleazergatphoh8313 Před rokem +15

    This Razzak Khan should explain to the nation that whether the remarks of Nupur Sharma was a fake or fact

  • @kgmuralidharan07
    @kgmuralidharan07 Před rokem +9

    The triall in Nupur Sharma case is meaningless without making Taslim Rehmani party to the case. It will be a one way traffic and if this happens then the case against Sharma should be dismissed.

  • @ambarishhegde6643
    @ambarishhegde6643 Před rokem +20

    It is not about the court case It is about her security till how long?

    • @thiruneermalai3845
      @thiruneermalai3845 Před rokem

      Yes...if they can attempt to murder a person after 35 years...it's really worrying!

  • @jaggiakash8758
    @jaggiakash8758 Před rokem +2

    Mr. J. Sai Deepak should be invited to every debate on matters of public importance.

  • @meenak.3454
    @meenak.3454 Před rokem +6

    Nipur sharmas life is in danger.this is by zubair,who has made it worldwide and make it a big issue
    Bjp made 2 wrong desicions! Never ever protect their workers.
    Bowing for islamic states!!!!!
    The weak actions by bjp supremo,SC,UN,Human rights , made her life a hell!.shame on secular hindu!!!

  • @swaradanargolkar9884
    @swaradanargolkar9884 Před rokem +2

    I agree with Shri. Ratan Shardaji

  • @kamaleshchakraborty7751
    @kamaleshchakraborty7751 Před rokem +2

    This guy Mr.
    Razzak doesn't deserve to be on the debate.

  • @skippernk5070
    @skippernk5070 Před rokem +14

    Why Times Now invite Abdul Razzak on panel? Ain't Times Now responsible when a panel member talks rubbish and cause disturbance in part of society?

    • @chandrasekharj6604
      @chandrasekharj6604 Před rokem +1

      That guy Vikraman is more venomous and talking absurd

    • @thiruneermalai3845
      @thiruneermalai3845 Před rokem

      @@chandrasekharj6604
      Oh...you should listen to his boss thirumavalavan. A snake in human form. His only goal in life is to destroy sanatana Dharma. He says that openly.

    • @josephjames859
      @josephjames859 Před rokem

      When you deny Razzak the right to express his views, you are no different from the Islamists who do not brook any criticism of their text. You can't have a debate by everyone expressing the same view. Let them say what they want and expose themselves.

    • @thiruneermalai3845
      @thiruneermalai3845 Před rokem +1

      @@josephjames859
      Oh ..justifying beheading is freedom of speech!!! Super!!! 👏👏👏👏😏

    • @josephjames859
      @josephjames859 Před rokem

      @@thiruneermalai3845
      As long as he doesn't break the law of the land, it is freedom of speech. The moment he crosses the line, the anchor should file an FIR. Freedom of speech doesn't mean that you give the freedom to say only what you like. As Voltaire famously said, "I don't like what you say, but I will defend to death your freedom to say it." I have heard Hindu activists justifying Akhlank's murder on TV. Allow them to say it and expose themselves.

  • @r.cpadhy2820
    @r.cpadhy2820 Před rokem +4

    Hypocrats should be protested and face the same consequences if Nupur is responsible then Rehmani is also responsible on the same ground , equality must prevail , the slogannering is illegal it can be counter productive and provocative , who were peace loving.

  • @alishaedwin6815
    @alishaedwin6815 Před rokem +5

    Its illegal for what those judges did because it can prejudice the case

  • @surendrakhanna1749
    @surendrakhanna1749 Před rokem +4

    Followers of any religion can’t tolerate any adverse remarks on their prophet, how could they get rights to issue adverse remarks on deity of others religion.

  • @vm3306
    @vm3306 Před rokem +4

    the whole thing started when tasleem rahamani repeatedly insulted hindu gods, nupur sharma reacted by quoting for the texts.
    tasleem rahamani gets away with everything as he is supported by muslims and the self proclaimed secularists, nupursharma got a sar tan.... . even the courts which has secular word in the constitution put by indira gandhi during emergency did not ask for punishment of tasleem rahamani.
    the ecosystem is against hindus while appeasing muslims

  • @kajaldhanbad4736
    @kajaldhanbad4736 Před rokem +3

    J. Sai Deepak Sir raised relevant truth, the context on which nupur sharma had reacted. Salute and good wishes sir

  • @vbpandey26
    @vbpandey26 Před rokem +1

    The Karnatka fell must be kicked out of this debate.

  • @ritasharmabansal8987
    @ritasharmabansal8987 Před rokem +1

    Well done Rahul Ji

  • @rajnish8918
    @rajnish8918 Před rokem +1

    The debates on this show set a gold standard of how a debate should be conducted...

  • @kamalkantinandi571
    @kamalkantinandi571 Před rokem +12

    what a delight to watch Rahul Shivsankar ji! Greetings from Russia, sir!

  • @sudhirpai7131
    @sudhirpai7131 Před rokem +2

    People like abdul razak khan are spoiling indian muslims

  • @nagomikathrivan5408
    @nagomikathrivan5408 Před rokem

    Happy to see VCK vikraman in a national chanel

  • @eldenring5614
    @eldenring5614 Před rokem +3

    I thought this jihadi razzak was the dimmest bulb in the panel, but vikraman seems dimmer than a fused bulb.

  • @R.kandaswamy
    @R.kandaswamy Před rokem

    One of the results of Supreme Court judges, Nupur Sharma's life will never be same again. She will be under the threat like

  • @veekramjhurry3206
    @veekramjhurry3206 Před rokem +1

    Nupur Sharma should get total protection in systematically all her movements inland or abroad...The barbars won't hesitate to harm her...see what happened to Salman Rushdie...

  • @sagarahire9630
    @sagarahire9630 Před rokem +1

    We Hindus Stand tall with Nupur Mam

  • @VINODPATEL-mf2ky
    @VINODPATEL-mf2ky Před rokem +2

    it is the duty of the government, the people of India to protect Nupur who merely pointed the fact of Islamic violent history.

  • @sudhirpai7131
    @sudhirpai7131 Před rokem +2

    Mr razzak khan has to seek apology

  • @rram4772
    @rram4772 Před rokem

    Sabash Sai Deepakji for restoring the context of utterances by Nupur. Similar whitewashing of context is done in the case of Godhra riots. Nobody talks about live burning of Karsevak's families & kids.

  • @ajitnadgouda6079
    @ajitnadgouda6079 Před rokem +1

    If the original order did not contain the words that came out from loose tounges mouths of judges supporting "sar tanse juda", can they not say sorry from that same mouth of the original order was incorrect? That sorry too can be oral. Need not be a part of the order.

  • @shekhardeshpande8314
    @shekhardeshpande8314 Před rokem +1

    Nupur life will be always in Denger even if SC free her of all allegations..These Jihadi will never give up as in the case of Rushdie ,these jihadis waited for I think 20 yrs for to attack him.

  • @Devpy-be7uf
    @Devpy-be7uf Před rokem +4

    Ban book which teach and promote concepts like
    jihad, maal-e-ghanimat, kafir-momin, jaziya.
    jahannam, jannath, gilma, houris
    al-taqiyya, al-twarya, al-kitman al-muruna
    darul aman - darul harb - darul islam
    nikah, muta'a, talak, halaala , rajm,

  • @manupatel6700
    @manupatel6700 Před rokem +2

    Amir mamu insults lord Shiva and gets 600 crores for pk

  • @amitbhadauria4119
    @amitbhadauria4119 Před rokem +1

    First of all media must stop calling irelevant people on live debate just for heated debate, call some sensible people, indian media should not be the mouth piece for tukde tukde gang. IGNORE them.

  • @ccx-christianuccforindia

    None of the Islamic countries have spoken against Uighur Muslims atrocities.. So much for caring about what is happening to the name of Mohammed, or changing words of Quran, they care about international politics or relationship, it’s about money
    None of them can say what Nupur Sharma said a wrong information

  • @laxmikanthaprabhumn4448
    @laxmikanthaprabhumn4448 Před rokem +2

    I will appeal to TimesNow pl pl don’t invite this Haramkore Rajaq..nonsense

  • @SANJEEVARRORA
    @SANJEEVARRORA Před rokem +1

    Please call Waseem Rizvi ( J N Tyagi ) on debate Why Supreme Court rejected his SLP on removal of 26 verses teaching violence ? What is his future action? Why was he put behind bars for four months under same sections for which Zubair got bail in predecided manner by Ramanna and Chandrachud ?

  • @abhishukla6588
    @abhishukla6588 Před rokem

    superb dibet....,

  • @iyer7550
    @iyer7550 Před rokem +1

    Nupur will b exonerated but as long as we have such radicalised madarasa alumni her life will b in danger as Salman rushdie's life is

  • @leftistfkr9538
    @leftistfkr9538 Před rokem

    Those two judges are kalank of SC

  • @shyamsundarmanitripathi1466

    I support nupur Sharma always

  • @deep22seem
    @deep22seem Před rokem

    Why are the Hindus and Media and the court silent about Abdul Rehmanis

  • @RaviNayyar
    @RaviNayyar Před rokem

    Zubair has alleged FCRA violations and evidence destruction charges against him.

  • @msabi0605
    @msabi0605 Před rokem

    M sure VCK Vikraman dint understand what J Sai Deepak Said 😂😂🤣

  • @rkr89
    @rkr89 Před rokem +4

    Saudi and Anand so lucidbin their argumen5s how wrong the JUDGES were who made those comments have embolden the like of this FEKU razack MAN just go to Bahrain Saudi Arabia Yemen Pakistan AFGHANISTAN and many more other countries who smother the voice of their people. THANK RAMJI for BHARAT.JAI SHREE RAM

  • @msabi0605
    @msabi0605 Před rokem

    There was a muslim party in Tamil nadu who in a public meeting Called for the death of the judge in the Karnataka Hijab row ask VCK Vikraman to comment on that

  • @scientistswife
    @scientistswife Před rokem

    Dismiss these judges

  • @swaradanargolkar9884
    @swaradanargolkar9884 Před rokem

    Rahulji
    No body is speaking on instigating Nupurji. What about Rehmaniji and others making bad comments on Shambhu Mahadev? Why there are no FIRs against them?

  • @suisenshirasaki8298
    @suisenshirasaki8298 Před rokem +3

    Vikraman lacks self awareness to such an extent he fails to recognise the contradictions in his own statements. So criticising the judiciary should be the sole preserve of the people Vikraman sympathises with. What a barefaced hypocrite. I despair for the people he administers over. His submissions would be laughable were they not so insidious.

  • @rajendrajasathy4356
    @rajendrajasathy4356 Před rokem

    This is the only channel who bring meaningful topic for discussion and also do it meaningfully. Rest others just do it for hype and trps.

  • @KrishnaDas-vv8cd
    @KrishnaDas-vv8cd Před rokem

    Amidst all this nonsense I wonder what kiren as law minister is upto ? Why is he silent on this issue

  • @swagat8393
    @swagat8393 Před rokem

    Dr Ranganathan is pure bliss to watch , so relatable and honest.
    Any judges should appologize for making biased remarks unrelated/related to the case without no proof to back it up

  • @duckwalkerindian4689
    @duckwalkerindian4689 Před rokem

    if u slap a case for quoting from a book....then ban that book

  • @Devpy-be7uf
    @Devpy-be7uf Před rokem +1

    Court judges should be elected not selected. They should follow constitution no place for dictators in democracy.
    Hope court will apologize for the careless statements.

  • @ravintripathi
    @ravintripathi Před rokem

    J sai diliberately skip that Justce Dhingra used the word prejudiced. And that is against judges sitting. But I am in complete agreement with Justce Dhingra

  • @RaviNayyar
    @RaviNayyar Před rokem

    VCK spox is not doing the Dalit cause any favours with such bizarre arguments.

  • @hariommaheshwari606
    @hariommaheshwari606 Před rokem +1

    Need not worry Rahul. SC has fixed rate list of its contempt by legal fraternity. It's Re. 1/- as in case of PB.

  • @scientistswife
    @scientistswife Před rokem

    Hindu rastra declare. Post partition there cannot be secularism any more

  • @dynasticpoliticscorruption7053

    Irresponsible Judges with fake Hindu sounding names to fool people should take responsibility for killings that took place post their remarks. They have to tender an unconditional apology to the nation
    Support Learned sir Anand Ranganathan 🙏🌹🌹🙏

  • @R.kandaswamy
    @R.kandaswamy Před rokem

    No Momeen has denied what Nupur Sharma said on TV debate is not written in Islamic Scriptures.

  • @holselkafada8439
    @holselkafada8439 Před rokem

    Judges are adding fuel to fire with such observations. Sad state of affairs. You guys are giving lee way to islam religion to create unrest.

  • @chatrukripalani7671
    @chatrukripalani7671 Před rokem +1

    I don't agree with advocate Sai Deepak's views on the significance or importance of 'obiter dicta' of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the course of a judgement. The damage has been done to Nupur and her case. Lower Judiciary in India , where most of litigation takes place are obliged to and dare not ignore or reject the obiter dicta of the Supreme Court. For all practical purposes, the obiter dicta is the law if the land , except perhaps in the Apex Court. Professor Ranganathan is spot on in his comments on the clarity and consistency of laws in any field. Jai Hind

  • @rajendrajasathy4356
    @rajendrajasathy4356 Před rokem

    SC judged should also be made accountable for their judgement and comments, specifically when it clearly shows they were impartial. These SC secular lobby is quite active in protecting the people of certain community.

  • @dollysingh3352
    @dollysingh3352 Před rokem

    They can Abuse the Hindu God and insulting. They criminal intent apply on them too.

  • @kajaldhanbad4736
    @kajaldhanbad4736 Před rokem +1

    Expose tasleem rahmaani continuously the narrative shouldn't go onesided

  • @nagarajreddy5484
    @nagarajreddy5484 Před rokem +1

    One more from south .. Vikraman 😂😂😂

  • @malarrganesan2008
    @malarrganesan2008 Před rokem

    People are getting fed up. Punish the murderers. Stop all this debates

  • @shivakumarm6576
    @shivakumarm6576 Před rokem

    I told you Rahul!!! Vikraman is a mad fellow!!!Now I am proved right….

  • @nagaanantha948
    @nagaanantha948 Před rokem +1

    😂 well done Rahul you put that "chap" in his place 👏👏👏

  • @venkataperumalrangaswamy8227

    Hey Times NOW, Why are you NOT setting qualifications of the participants before calling them for discussions ........That guy (people know whom I am refering) is AMAZING in his discussions........SUPER !!!

  • @KB-ci4hg
    @KB-ci4hg Před rokem

    Times now or any others cannot change these talibani mind sets attitude.

  • @sanjaykulkarni8785
    @sanjaykulkarni8785 Před rokem

    Law and its supporters?? /great Judiciary?? and superb system??? keep it going??

  • @lakhmialagarsamy3105
    @lakhmialagarsamy3105 Před rokem

    Rajak mind ur Ward's there are many fools in India who spoked about hindu religious u will stand no where. I request chief editor to don't allow this kind person in at ur debate.

  • @vishnuacharya6352
    @vishnuacharya6352 Před rokem

    These unofficial comments have to be curtailed while the judge is on his chair: he/she can pass the comment later before the media as it pleases them.

  • @leethewsie8384
    @leethewsie8384 Před rokem

    Why not she has media like you and papa Amit Shah behind her. Both Nupur and Smriti can say anything.

  • @chandrakanthshetty3312

    why this news papers fools making a mountain out of moul.these are people you are putting gher on fire just for footage they are creating more trouble in India now the matter had become old u forget it u do something educative to the society.we know how to handle this nupoor issue.

  • @eleazergatphoh8313
    @eleazergatphoh8313 Před rokem +1

    This VCK panelist do have some reasoning power with logics

    • @ramachandran-gm9ds
      @ramachandran-gm9ds Před rokem

      This VCK vikraman is not having knowledge In all rhe debates he will nonsense other main topic of the debate thereby he will nosecut.Why Times now entertaining such persons in the debate you will get any discussions from him

    • @nagaanantha948
      @nagaanantha948 Před rokem

      🙆

  • @muralidharansomasundaram1509

    When you have esteemed and learned people like Sai Deepak and Dr Ranganathan in the panel, why did you include an illiterate like Vikraman? It is an insult to the audience as well as the other panellists. His shallow views and stupid arguments makes one cringe. Avoid this idiot to save your reputation and your channel's prestige.

  • @alishaafi9737
    @alishaafi9737 Před rokem

    Oh ranganathan in debate with Rahul shivshankar...🤣🤣🤣

    • @nagaanantha948
      @nagaanantha948 Před rokem

      So what he makes very intelligent and legitimate points that the other panellist can't argue. Unlike them who oppose are always full of lies and get fact checked by Dr. Ranganathan. 👏👏👏 Dr. Ranganathan and Rahul.

  • @chandreshpandey6933
    @chandreshpandey6933 Před rokem

    Dont knw why Supreme Court is even entertaining such stupid case. But also i think if SC is entertaining this case there is something which will come out and will be SLAP to those stupids...

  • @ramantanga6253
    @ramantanga6253 Před rokem

    why this taufeeq and jawai panelist type keep staring down shamefully when other guest panelists speaking

  • @sk185050
    @sk185050 Před rokem

    Yaar kin logo se baat karte ho yaar ..u cannot satisfy them ..

  • @VINODPATEL-mf2ky
    @VINODPATEL-mf2ky Před rokem

    it is time to spend more time to educate local Muslins Maulanas not to play God who resides in heaven. it is the God duty to judge who enters heaven. Those who encourage violence are not have dog chance to go to Heaven.

  • @Drkirtishukla
    @Drkirtishukla Před rokem

    Hahahah lock at this chap limited understanding

  • @rram4772
    @rram4772 Před rokem

    Rahulji why do you call people like Vikraman who doesn't have any thing worthwhile to contribute? Just a waste of my time.

  • @samk1844
    @samk1844 Před rokem

    Sar tan se juda

  • @sharathxerox9044
    @sharathxerox9044 Před rokem

    All goons are helping nupur, when it come to zubair none of these goons came, debating for an useless women

    • @Versatileabhi
      @Versatileabhi Před rokem

      Zubair is not getting death threats .He just a got a taste of his own medicine of supporting blashphemy laws.. Atleast have a basic understanding of situation Islamic Extremist.

    • @sharathxerox9044
      @sharathxerox9044 Před rokem

      @@Versatileabhi zubair indirectly got death treats from bjp ministers, rss, bajrangdal, these hindutva ideology is dangerous to indian democracy

    • @Versatileabhi
      @Versatileabhi Před rokem

      @@sharathxerox9044 Not more than Islamic ideology.. Hindutva is a normal cold wheres Islamic ideology is AIDS.. India is still a secular country with secular constitution with Hindutva .on the other hand Islamist countries are all theocratic with sharia laws. Thats more than enough to see the difference..

    • @Versatileabhi
      @Versatileabhi Před rokem

      @@sharathxerox9044 Indirectly lol..were you checking his messages.. Don't just talk bs just for the sake...There is no comparison..One files FIR another openly chants sar tan se juda..

    • @sharathxerox9044
      @sharathxerox9044 Před rokem

      @@Versatileabhi rss and bajrang do same threats

  • @anonymousanonymous7993
    @anonymousanonymous7993 Před rokem +1

    RSS, On your question about whether Nupur Sharma Be Able To Do Away With The Cases Against Her, it is very clear these cases will be closed pretty soon and no action will be taken against Nupur. When there is no will to prosecute her, there is no way to prosecute her! The police will not ask for her custody, they will file a very weak charge sheet, and will not object to her bail plea. We know it is the Delhi police, which comes under MHA under Amit Shah - that is the reason she was asking for all the FIRs to be clubbed in Delhi. Sadly, this is how the governments, police, and judiciary work in our country!

  • @swamibhaktivedantagaurapad1494

    SUPREME COURT JUDGES ARE NOT DICTATORS OF INDIA !! IF THEY HAVE COMMITTED A MISTAKE , THEN , THEY MUST BEG APOLOGY FROM THE CITIZENS . 🚩🏹⚔️🛕🛕🛕🏹⚔️🚩

  • @R.kandaswamy
    @R.kandaswamy Před rokem

    Daniel Pearl was not beheaded in the name of Islam.
    Samuel Patty was not stabbed in the name of Islam.
    Kanhaiya Lal was not beheaded in the name of Rasul.
    Praveen Nettaru was not killed in the name of Islam.
    ISIS is not on killing in the name of Islam.
    Jaish e Mohammad is not Islamic terrorism organization.
    Boko Haram is not commitng atrocities in name of Islam.
    Islam is most peaceful faith.