Gibson vs. Epiphone - J-45 | What Are The Differences?
VloĆŸit
- Äas pĆidĂĄn 21. 07. 2024
- The Inspired By Gibson line has, more than ever, brought the quality and sound of Epiphone and Gibson closer to each other. But what are the real differences? In this video Keiran takes a look at the Inspired by Gibson J-45 and the Gibson 50's J-45, compares the sound and spec and we go over the differences.
Gear used -
Inspired by Gibson J-45 - gtrgtr.uk/EpiphoneIBGJ45
Gibson 50's J-45 - gtrgtr.uk/Gibson50J45
Shure SM27 - gtrgtr.uk/ShureSM27
Boss Katana - gtrgtr.uk/BossKatana50w
_______________________________________________
Chapters đŹ
0:00 - intro
0:48 - the J-45
1:20 - the similarities
2:45 - the differences
8:33 - sound test
9:54 - final thoughts
_______________________________________________
Let's get social... đ€đž
Facebook: gtrgtr.uk/gg-facebook
Instagram: gtrgtr.uk/gg-instagram
Twitter: gtrgtr.uk/gg-twitter
TikTok: gtrgtr.uk/gg-TikTok - ZĂĄbava
Thanks. The difference between the sounds is more obvious on this video than I've heard on others. It's not that one is better, but the Epiphone sounds fuller, more solid, whereas the Gibson has a pleasing airy tone. I've plumped for the Epiphone.
For me, the Gibson does sound slightly better, but like maybe 5% better and for the money the Epiphone is pretty much fantastic. The Gibson, being made in the USA is really cool. One day I hope to be able to afford one. Until then, this Epiphone Inspired By Gibson series will do just fine.
I've listened to this on several systems now (speakers and headphones) and the Epiphone is coming out on top. the Gibson isn't bad but just sounds so much weaker and smaller!
Same for me with headphones, the Epiphone sounded richer!
The inspired by Gibson are solid wood guitars like the Gibson is. Dont confuse them with the the other epiphone j45 guitars. Big difference. Both of these guitars are all solid wood and will continue to age and get better and better.
8:34 epiphon
8:45 gibison
8:57 epipone
9:06 gibisun
9:22 epiphon
9:39 Gibson
I was able to buy the epiphone j45 and I like its sound, but I would like to know if the Gibson j45 weighs the same as the Epiphone because comparing other guitars with solid woods the epiphone weighs a lot and with the case it weighs more jajaja.
Finally a perfect video. Thank you friend. I think I'll definitely bet on Gibson :)
good review
I find that the Epiphone sounds better, more midrange and warmth in the sound, which shows that the choice of an instrument is not really a question of price...
Like them both, Gibson definitely the winner.
This review was đ„
Where was this guitar made?
China
i have a 66 gibson j45 and a 69 epiphone texan, they sound totally different to each other, but it's a hard job to say which sounds "better". clearly gibson is a "more desirable" brand, but if you want a guitar that will be worth more than you paid for it - in 50 years time that is - then the epi is a bargain, and is every bit as good. actually i used to have an epiphone AJ220, that's almost identical to a J45, the bass wasn't as good (laminate is never good) but a lovely guitar and a joy to have owned. i do lots of comparisons and some vids on my current guitar line up on my channel.
i think the satin finish is much better, satin necks are much nicer to play on. both my j45 and the texan have worn to the point of being satin rather than gloss, who cares? they look great.
I have a 64â Texan and Iâve never played a better guitar. I donât have a 60s Gibson acoustic but I played them and the Texan is the best acoustic Iâve ever played by far.
Is it same strings on both guitars?
I don't think so. I also don't know why they increased the price on this guitar. I bought mine few years ago 200 USD
@@joaocarvalho1424 the inspired by Gibson Epiphone J45 is solid Mahogany, solid Sitka Spruce top. Previous Epiphone models are most likely laminate and cheaper. Specs on the Epiphone website show they use light gauge Gibson phosphor bronze strings.
@@joaocarvalho1424 It is unlikely that that was the Inspired By Gibson J-45, model number IGMTJ455AVSNH1.
to be frank they'd have to be very different to make any noticeable difference to the sound of the guitar, rhet shule and rick beato, and paul davids have done string comparisons, and although they is a wide variety of sounds, it's not that wide that you could tell from a recording if the strings were the same or different, only if it was steel up against phosphor bronze say.
@@joaocarvalho1424the one he is testing has an orange label inside. They are made more like the Gibson.
Gibson has such a warmer sound
I have a 2014 Gibson J-45 & a 2008 Gibson Super Dove, I also have a Sigma J200 and for me If you want a great quality copy of any Gibson Acoustic's, Sigma are amazing.
In this exact video I vote for Epiphone, soundwise Epi is more attractive to me
Why are the 2023 models made in China and Indonesia for prior 2023?
Good question. You mean 2023 of course. It has to be about costs. As for quality, we don't know yet whether that will be maintained. Glad I bought my IBG J-45 before this came up, because although I bought it new very recently it was made 2 years ago at the Samick factory in Indonesia. The serial number says so. Buying an IBG guitar now I'd want to check where it was made. Let's hope the Chinese ones get reviewed soon and turn out to be just as good.
With headphones the Epiphone sounded much richer to me!
Save up for the Gibson but Epi not badđđđđđđđđđ
Belle perruque !
I played a Epi J45 and I was not impressed. The sound was very dead/flat and a heavy guitar These vids are great but you have to actually play them to really get the full sound. If I didnât have money for a Gibson I would look at Eastman guitars as they do a J45 style
Those Eastman ss dreads are excellent but I am entirely satisfied with my IBG J-45. It's a surprisingly capable all-rounder.
Itâs a beef compared to a burger.
Here the Gibson sounded way better than the epiphone did. Now, is it worth the extra $2250? Certainly not, Iâd say the Gibson sounds like a $1500 guitar and it would be worth that much, thatâs how much Iâd be willing to pay for it.
Also John Lennon didnât play the Gibson J45, he played a Gibson J-160e.
Be careful with subjectivity, I absolutely do not find that the Gibson sounds much better than the Epi, on the contrary I find that the Epiphone has more midrange and a warmer sound. If we compare the sound of the guitars, the huge price difference is absolutely not justified.
@@Lolo.13good point. Certainly not worth the price difference, i must agree. I do love epiphones too, theyâre great guitars.
John Lennon played a J-160E. OK it's a sloping shoulsder guitar but it's not a J45 as you stated
it had a pickup, that's the only difference.
@@HarryNicNicholasno it was more different than that- the j45 is an X braced guitar whereas the j160e is ladder braced. The j45 has a solid Sitka spruce top whereas the j160e has a laminated spruce top. Both of which make a world of difference between the two guitars, it wasnât just a pickup placement.
Epiphone sounds good for a low cost imitation
The Gibson sounds so much more musical, sorry.