How fast do you think a 767 is able to physically fly at 700ft altitude? And how fast were the “planes” flying on impact? Two very interesting questions with even more interesting answers.
@markhellman-pn3hn You don’t have to be a weatherman to know which way the wind blows. I have little understanding of structural engineering, but I’m convinced intel agencies conduct false flags to push their narratives and agendas. Building 7 stands out as an extraordinarily unlikely collapse given it wasn’t directly hit and fell just like a controlled demolition.
So sorry you witnessed it in person. Nobody should ever have to see the sights that were seen that day. Sorry if this is too personal but do you have PTSD? I have PTSD from being in Israel when the 2014 war, we were staying with Bedouin in tents in the desert next to an air force base when all of a sudden tens of fighter jets took off and we could see them firing. Even now 10 years later, low flying planes brings back awful feelings and memories.
Jonathan, if you haven’t researched EMDR (trauma therapy), please do check it out. It’s hard work, but worth every bit of time and effort you put in to your recovery ❤️🩹 🙏🌊
People fight so hard in their beliefs when most of the time there’s no proven facts. I will say I’m 50/50 on this topic. Some of the conspiracies are super believable while some you just say “there’s just no way, this guys sounds stupid”
Your video collection on the twin towers is very interesting & thought provoking. Have you ever seen the short documentary about the artists and free studio space at the twin towers ? They showed video of the evening of September 10th. There was an artist present on the 11th that died in the collapse, there may have been more than one possibly. Besides all that, I can't find this video anywhere now. I would like to see it again. Maybe you'll have better luck than me.
The only conspiracy I kinda thought was plausible was the asbestos theory where the opportunity for government overhaul and rebuilding money outweighed the cost of renovating the towers and the asbestos claims for the people who worked there; but it kinda falls flat when you really look into it but that one was interesting.
I still wanna know how you casually knew the hours of the restaurant on the 107th floor... my conspiracy theory is that *you* did it. I will bring this up every video...
3:49 YUP! Thank you for saying this. This has been my argument for years-pretty much since that day: Tell me, what NORMALLY happens when fully-fueled jumbo jets SLAM into skyscrapers [peculiarly these two], with intent, and at a high rate of speed? How does that NORMALLY turn out? Please cite examples external to 9/11 for comparison. The truth is one can’t. There IS [was] no other examples to compare the outcome of when fully-fueled jumbo jets SLAM into skyscrapers, with intent, and at a high rate of speed. Now we have, not one, but TWO examples of that scenario, and look!..both examples we now have resulted in, more-or-less, the exact same outcome. How do we know that what millions witnessed with their own eyes or on TV screens isn’t exactly what happens when fully-fueled jumbo jets SLAM into skyscrapers, with intent, and at a high rate of speed? Even if that wasn’t an ignorant argument that account trolled-the audacity to say what [sh]ould’ve happened.
I’d be sure to point out the 9/11 commission and how it was set up to fail. How Henry Kissinger had connections to the Bin Laden Family. Phillip Zelikow and his shady ways after taking over the chair. The commission is the smoking gun for me when people ask my opinion on that day.
The Most likely conspiracy theory Is the 9/11Truth Movement was at first a Russian Disinformation campaign and idiots fell for it. Wait no that is the truth.
Bear in mind that much of the towers were actually pulverized into huge dust clouds by the force of the collapses. Skyscrapers are mostly “empty space” anyhow, but a large portion of the debris was actually airborne.
I am curious if you have ever watched "Behind the Smoke Curtain" compiled by Barbara Honneger (an analyst in the White House during the Reagan administration)? "Behind the Smoke Curtain" is her analysis of what happened at the Pentagon. It's still on CZcams and it is a 3-hr watch, but it is incredibly interesting and is full of in-depth research. Based on what you said in this video, I think you would appreciate it.
My dads cousin was a training captain for Cathay Pacific at the time and he reckons the flight path for the pentagon was nigh on impossible for even a highly trained pilot with 10,000 hours.
There is nothing impossible in this world ...there are plenty of books of 1760-1790 where people said it is impossible for man to make flying machine( Aeroplane) but now that impossible thing is reality. So don't believe blindly😂
I saw on a video on the topic of the recordings from near the Pentagon were seized, a freedom of information act was used to request for all the footage but it turns out most of the cameras were either not aimed at the pentagon's direction, didn't even record probably or was only partially saw the plane hit the light posts on the highway.
The reason there is not more footage at the pentagon because the side of the pentagon the attackers hit was under construction and was being renovated.
There is a couple wtc 7 videos where you see there are fires in the lobby of building 7. Also it looks like the air conditioners on the top fell like 6 seconds before the whole structure
NOT to mention the whole building fell over sideways onto Filtermans Hall and the moment Frame lands on top. Clearly the building was hulled out then the columns of the moment frame were kicked out by the spreading debris pile.
The interesting thing about Flight 77 is that they overshot the Pentagon at first, and they made a huge turnaround nearly putting the plane at like an 85 degree angle. So they did infact overshoot, they maybe even had a different impact plan and changed last minute. Idk. But all I know is that had to turn back around which gave them plenty of room to descend
Much of the towers turned into dust, read Where Did The Towers Go? By Judy Wood, it’s a great read and one of the best explanations for what happened to the towers.
@@AnixCo1990 I've seen it. It's the only engineering paper I've read that looks like a comic book. Wood is the laughing stock of the scientific community. Even other Twoofer laugh at her. Death rays from space..... Bahahahahaaaaaaaaaa.
Video idea: What if the Sears(Willis) Tower in Chicago was hit by a plane on 9/11 like the twin towers of the wtc were. Would it collapse like the twins did or it would have survived due to how it's structure is built. The reason I'm suggesting this idea is because sometime ago I've heard that the terrorist originally planned to target the sears tower as well but then decided to only go for the twins, the pentagon and the white house.
People will be presented with the fact that Flight 77 crashed into the Pentagon, a building 77 feet tall and on the 77th meridian, 77 minutes after takeoff at 777 feet/second, and still call it a coincidence.
@@mikero6225 took off at 8:20, crashed at 9:37 (77 minutes), it's at 77.05 deg W, it was traveling at 530 mph (530*5280/60/60=777.333 ft/sec). The only figure that's debatable is the height, but even without that, those are some remarkable "coincidences".
The pentagon was most likely because it was the end still is the military headquarters. My thought has always been they wanted more damage done to the pentagon.
the screen netting reference is almost a word for word parroting of an engineer on a 9/11 documentary a few years back referring to the columns and the core of buildings as a screen netting. remember that conspiracy theorists always parrot some random things they hear in passing and go with it because it sounds right to them. He wasn't mistaking them for the empire state building, he was just repeating some shit he heard which makes it worse in a way because he's so confident and wrong
The longer I live the more I realize just how truly massive the world trade center was. Its almost inconceivible to me as someone who has never been too a city as large as New York.
dont know if it was mentioned here already but i heared a plausbile one that isnt even reliant on a conspiracy and supported by the incident report: molten aluminum that gets into contact with water becommes a explosive and there is confirmation of molten aluminum from the airframes in the report. two experts in the handling and safety in alimunim recycling plants in norway and the US independently of each other came to the conclusion that the tower might have fallen from a explosion caused by the molten airframes coming into contact with water in the floors directly underneath the impact points.
No I already discussed that with Dr. Greening, there is a way an Aluminum reaction can occur but it wouldn't have been possible in the Twin Tower's and no evidence for it.
Thanks for the video. I wouldn't be surprised if they undershot their intended aim point at the Pentagon. Hitting towards the center would do more damage. I think that they may have wanted to hit higher and just missed. The one thought that I have for the twin towers is that maybe they had someone deliver some packages that would have made the towers burn more. For instance, a palate of oxygen cylinders delivered anywhere near where the planes hit would eventually rupture due to heat or be destroyed by the impact. Mixing pure oxygen into fire would make the fire burn hotter. Maybe they had additional terrorists who dressed as deliverymen and took something like that to the towers. Maybe they disguised the cylinders and sent them through UPS. Even if they were discovered, people would most likely write off the problem as a mistake. Another point that people seem to forget is that the towers had to have a great deal of electricity running all of those floors of offices. When the power lines were first cut, they likely arced. I'm sure that there was some highly burnt steel as the arcing electricity reached steel structures in the towers. That wouldn't be the result of conspiracy. That would be the result of any disaster of similar scale.
Try explaining the logic of building 7. The official story makes zero sense. Senior architects & engineers all over the world are 100% certain major fuckery occurred with building 7.
@@daviddavis6975 you are partially correct but the news claims fires broke down the structure of the building. For fires to cause a building to free fall almost in a demolition type manner 5 hours after the twin towers, that doesn’t add up. With what the building housed, that’s another story
@@daviddavis6975God himself could come down and explain it, and still there would be plenty that just reject it. It was too big and traumatic for anyone to really wrap their heads around, causes be damned.
@@johnjimmies8256 because their explanation is a bit off. 7WTC was damaged by the collapse of 1WTC, but that's not what doomed the building. What doomed the building was that said damage triggered a fire, which then burned out of control across multiple floors for the next eight hours (which is beyond the rating of fireproofing used in buildings like that at the time). I suspect that had it not caught fire, it would have eventually been torn down like the Deutsche Bank Building (which sustained damage from the collapse of 2WTC, but didn't catch fire and thus didn't collapse).
That's because under normal circumstances skyscrapers has both passive and active fire abatement. In the case of WTC 1&2 neither existed that day. IN the case of WTC 7 it only had passive abatement and it was only rated for 3 hours; the building burned for 7. NIST was not surprised the bldg collapsed. Since 9/11 several high-rise blgds have collapsed from fire, thus proving NIST correct.
@@Oldschooldan1ahhh you mean NIST who firstly denied that building 7 fell at freefall then were challenged and admitted it did free fall for over 2 seconds of it's collapse. That can only happen if all of it's columns are removed at the same time
@@coolyoutubename16 Well, it's clear you never read the report. First off, NIST never denied that the bldg fell close to free fall. They just didn't mention it in their draft release, because it really wasn't that important. It didn't change their conclusion at all. They explained it in their final release. In fact, it actually supports their theory. You would know this if you actually read the report. Thanks for playing...
@@Oldschooldan1 "it supports their theory" - so that's all they have. A theory 😂. Also, they didn't mention freefall because it wasn't important? What?? It's the ONLY time in history a fire has caused a building to go into freefall. That is absolutely huge information and only those covering up the truth would claim it's insignificant. You cannot have freefall of a structure without removing the support of that structure at the same time, not a slow gradual fire Judy Wood presents evidence. None of which has been dunked
Oh man, I read that post. That poor guy, makes me feel horrible for your friend. Ive taken such a flight twice myself, both times were great... But I could only imagine the terrible depths of darkness and despair one would be plunged into witnessing this via Lucy. How many people saw this while on acid or something similar? That's two that I've seen so far.
@@mrandrossguy9871Everyone is entitled to their opinions you can believe why you want. Just know our government is not so innocent in the world as it makes it out to be. Go back to Vietnam and the CIA and on and on. Not everything is always as it seems either. Just saying.
It 's also like there was a Mandela Effect with airplanes . There is even evidence. And what exactly is it? This is what the planes were originally red and blue Boeing .Red in my opinion from the top and blue at the bottom . There is a video of a woman saying that a plane with a red and blue color allegedly flew and crashed into a tower .
I've read the engineering reports and looked at the math it all looks good to me. Perhaps you could show us where their math was wrong. I would say start with the load calculations for the floor systems and go for there. The gold was stored under WTC4 not 6. It belonged to the Swiss bank and they recovered all of it. There are photos of it being removed.
Pilots for 9/11 Truth have an interesting video about thr Pentagon and Flight 77. The weirdest thing with the Pentagon is the trajectory that Flight 77 took on its descent
The Pentagon wasn't an easy target with how low it was, I'm a little shocked they went that route rather than having flight 77 go for another easier to hit skyscraper (Transamerica Pyramid, Sears Tower, Empire State Building) or the White House/Capitol Building (whichever one flight 93 wasn't targeting).
@@SCP_3008_Employee hitting it from that angle, possibly going for the capitol or the white house. Take your pick. Those were not the only planes. ATC’s got those planes out of the air fast.
Conspiracy theories about 9/11 crack me up for the most part because the amount of people that would have to be bound and gagged to keep that major of an event secret and not spill the beans this many years later is incredible it's almost crazy any type of government conspiracy there it would have been leaked by now the US government can barely keep a secret about its own internal affairs let alone an event of that magnitude
Secret societies exist and persist. The information is already out there. You just don’t think so because state media has underreported, downplayed and veiled it entirely and major institutions.
So rather than look at the evidence, you've reduced it to whataboutisms Think about this. The Manhattan project had over 100,000 members and not even the president knew it was going on
@1:50-1:56 You make the dude's point @ 0:27. You're not disagreeing with him. The "mosquito net" is not any theory, but how the buildings were actually designed. The buildings were designed to withstand multiple plane impacts. Architect Frank DeMartini who worked at the World Trade Center and was intimately aware of how the buildings were designed, lost his life on 911 trying to save others, and is quoted saying this ( "Frank DeMartini, World Trade Center 1973 2001" ). Steel buildings do not collapse at near freefall speed in an explosive manner due to fire alone. This is why firefighters went into the twin towers that day. The explosive nature of the collapse of WTC1 and WTC2, was captured on multiple camera angles showing steel beams shooting out into adjacent buildings, and is worthy of further investigation, considering how many lives were lost that day and how many wars have been fought since. Also, the collapse of WTC7 at freefall speed around 5:20 PM, hit by no plane, should be enough to raise one's eyebrow.
Have you seen video of WTC7 fires, one video in particular is filmed from across the road from where WTC3 was. It shows basically the entire building on fire.
@@SCP_3008_Employee the corners? The building had huge steel columns around it and through the middle. They all failed at the exact same time? Fires don't burn like that
You are wrong on the collapse part. The weight load does not bear down and it does slow down as the more integral parts are reached. The energy from collapse went outwards not strictly downwards. Youve seen a game of Jenga yes no? Bc the top falls the bottom also automatically is destroyed at rate? The dumbest logic ive ever seen. You are egotistically wrong. You were sold
The very first tweet that you criticized was not just a tweet he was quoting an actual expert. Just because you dump on something it doesn't mean you disproved it you just complained about how YOU don't understand. Being a layman you wouldn't understand that's why we go to experts to understand which he or she was quoting. Look at climate change you have 99% of the scientific field agree it exists you feelings do not matter. Had you shown some sort of theory or at least an experiment to prove it wrong you would deserve credit. You are not the arbiter of physics nor acquainted with thermal studies and explosives so why are you stating an opinion. You literally don't have one you just say "no, I don't care" that's all the government has done for 23 years you're not the first and far from the last. The dumbest theories are not theories they are just blind uneducated guesses. Some think the TOWERS weren't real which having parents that worked in WTC 2 (in the 80's) is simply ridiculous and ignorant. THAT is worthy of relentless scrutiny.
There was nothing but dust at site day after. Dan Rather even asked where the f the building pieces were the next day. 2 million tons of "naturally fallen debris" lol gone over night with few structural pieces remaining. It's safe to say some.odd sh9t happened that day. Dude you are egotistically wrong. A tower doesn't need a wider base to be stronger at bottom. A high energy weapon was used.You think you know about the tech that the government uses or has developed?Just ask yourself that question and if you say and answer to yourself.Yes you shouldn't be allowed out in public
Just so you know, the DOE sold nuclear demolition plan to the WTC developers. They did not lie about it either as they called that area ground zero on that day.
There are a lot of things that don't add up and I don't believe anything our government says. The simple fact that AA and United had huge shorts put on during the week leading up to 9/11 tells me someone knew in advance and it was not just people planning it either.
![[Vowel]물고기는 물에서 살아야 해🐟🤣Fish have to live in the water #funny](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/3G9MH063Cx4/mqdefault.jpg)
Thought the 9/11 series was over, just when Ginger thought he was out…they pull him back in!
He needs to do a video of the most likely conspiracies from 9/11
@@jonn8911agreed. Think he said in one of the vids that he didn’t want to get into all the conspiracies
Truly the dumbest conspiracy theory was when people thought the planes were missiles with holographs of a plane. Like bro this isnt 2077 or anything!
Holograms have been in use look at the new michael jackson concerts
Another thinking bombs had been in the 2 towers in 1993 the basement of the towers were bombed
CGI bro Videos editados con aviones hologramas...
Exactly. Also the CGI people. This was 2001. Our CGI was the video "blue" by Eiffel 65.
How fast do you think a 767 is able to physically fly at 700ft altitude? And how fast were the “planes” flying on impact?
Two very interesting questions with even more interesting answers.
it never fails - people that have 00.00% engineering experience, know more than world class engineers that have 30 years experience !!
Have you ever heard of architects and engineers for 9/11 truth
@markhellman-pn3hn
You don’t have to be a weatherman to know which way the wind blows.
I have little understanding of structural engineering, but I’m convinced intel agencies conduct false flags to push their narratives and agendas. Building 7 stands out as an extraordinarily unlikely collapse given it wasn’t directly hit and fell just like a controlled demolition.
The founder of that group said its possible that earth is flat.
a new "flat earther" is born - congratulations !!
@@LukaszChojnacki-ft5ryany proof of that ? Links etc ?
The dumbest 9/11 conspiracy I've ever seen is the one that says the Yakuza did it.
I'm googling that right now..
😂😂😂 Never heard that one
Who said that?
@@jasonpalacios1363
🎵🎶Hello, hey you
Who said that? 🎵
🎶Baby, how you been?
Go ahead and jump🎶
🎵Go ahead and jump
Might as well jump🎶🎵
😂😂
Agreed, Still more credible than flat earth 😂😂😂
Fun fact: if you try to purposely hit the pentagon in Flight Simulator it will ban you.
Why can’t we accept that we lost? They got us.
Because it was an inside job.
Yeah the bush administration got us good
It's pretty much a fact now that it was allowed to happen, by how many in the gov or if the president was involved is another question.
Our government wanted it to happen. It gave them the “justified” decision for war to launch a bogus invasion of Iraq.
@@Mere-Lachaiselongue”pretty much a fact” lol
Yea well, I witnessed all those people dying in person
HTF do you think I feel all these years later 💔🇺🇸
Any video brings it all back
So sorry you witnessed it in person. Nobody should ever have to see the sights that were seen that day. Sorry if this is too personal but do you have PTSD? I have PTSD from being in Israel when the 2014 war, we were staying with Bedouin in tents in the desert next to an air force base when all of a sudden tens of fighter jets took off and we could see them firing. Even now 10 years later, low flying planes brings back awful feelings and memories.
Jonathan, if you haven’t researched EMDR (trauma therapy), please do check it out. It’s hard work, but worth every bit of time and effort you put in to your recovery ❤️🩹 🙏🌊
Never seen the "new" video.... anybody have a link to it and what's it supposed to represent or show?
People fight so hard in their beliefs when most of the time there’s no proven facts. I will say I’m 50/50 on this topic. Some of the conspiracies are super believable while some you just say “there’s just no way, this guys sounds stupid”
I remember my dad telling me it was Fidel Castro and the Cubans for the bay of pigs 🤣
Your video collection on the twin towers is very interesting & thought provoking.
Have you ever seen the short documentary about the artists and free studio space at the twin towers ?
They showed video of the evening of September 10th.
There was an artist present on the 11th that died in the collapse, there may have been more than one possibly.
Besides all that, I can't find this video anywhere now.
I would like to see it again.
Maybe you'll have better luck than me.
Any link to that Reddit video from 10th of September?
The only conspiracy I kinda thought was plausible was the asbestos theory where the opportunity for government overhaul and rebuilding money outweighed the cost of renovating the towers and the asbestos claims for the people who worked there; but it kinda falls flat when you really look into it but that one was interesting.
I still wanna know how you casually knew the hours of the restaurant on the 107th floor... my conspiracy theory is that *you* did it.
I will bring this up every video...
Depressed Ginger, you open to a live discussion on the events of 9/11?
3:49 YUP! Thank you for saying this. This has been my argument for years-pretty much since that day:
Tell me, what NORMALLY happens when fully-fueled jumbo jets SLAM into skyscrapers [peculiarly these two], with intent, and at a high rate of speed? How does that NORMALLY turn out? Please cite examples external to 9/11 for comparison. The truth is one can’t. There IS [was] no other examples to compare the outcome of when fully-fueled jumbo jets SLAM into skyscrapers, with intent, and at a high rate of speed. Now we have, not one, but TWO examples of that scenario, and look!..both examples we now have resulted in, more-or-less, the exact same outcome. How do we know that what millions witnessed with their own eyes or on TV screens isn’t exactly what happens when fully-fueled jumbo jets SLAM into skyscrapers, with intent, and at a high rate of speed?
Even if that wasn’t an ignorant argument that account trolled-the audacity to say what [sh]ould’ve happened.
Not me watching this at 9:11 am…
Maybe a Mexican Tourist 😆 5:50
Hahahaha that got me too, no chance it was an Italian or German tourist
Aye yi yi yi.....
Came here for this it caught me off guard lol
Could you make a video about the day after 9/11. like what happened on September 12, 2001.
Can you do a 9/11 conspiracy video of the most likely conspiracies.
I’d be sure to point out the 9/11 commission and how it was set up to fail. How Henry Kissinger had connections to the Bin Laden Family. Phillip Zelikow and his shady ways after taking over the chair. The commission is the smoking gun for me when people ask my opinion on that day.
The Most likely conspiracy theory Is the 9/11Truth Movement was at first a Russian Disinformation campaign and idiots fell for it. Wait no that is the truth.
I’ve seen 4 videos of the impact at the pentagon and the one at the gas station shows nothing but a slight reflection from the plane
Bear in mind that much of the towers were actually pulverized into huge dust clouds by the force of the collapses. Skyscrapers are mostly “empty space” anyhow, but a large portion of the debris was actually airborne.
The Light weight concrete used contained flyash glass microspheres to save weight.
How will this affect lebrons legacy?
😭
I am curious if you have ever watched "Behind the Smoke Curtain" compiled by Barbara Honneger (an analyst in the White House during the Reagan administration)? "Behind the Smoke Curtain" is her analysis of what happened at the Pentagon. It's still on CZcams and it is a 3-hr watch, but it is incredibly interesting and is full of in-depth research. Based on what you said in this video, I think you would appreciate it.
It was all Canada! I saw it on the South Park movie! BLAME CANADA!
My dads cousin was a training captain for Cathay Pacific at the time and he reckons the flight path for the pentagon was nigh on impossible for even a highly trained pilot with 10,000 hours.
There is nothing impossible in this world ...there are plenty of books of 1760-1790 where people said it is impossible for man to make flying machine( Aeroplane) but now that impossible thing is reality. So don't believe blindly😂
I saw on a video on the topic of the recordings from near the Pentagon were seized, a freedom of information act was used to request for all the footage but it turns out most of the cameras were either not aimed at the pentagon's direction, didn't even record probably or was only partially saw the plane hit the light posts on the highway.
Really ? Then why doesn’t the government release them then ?
The reason there is not more footage at the pentagon because the side of the pentagon the attackers hit was under construction and was being renovated.
That’s not correct. Government agencies confiscated many cameras in the area after the events
There is a couple wtc 7 videos where you see there are fires in the lobby of building 7. Also it looks like the air conditioners on the top fell like 6 seconds before the whole structure
Yeah, the penthouse office and the ac units collapsed inwards first.
NOT to mention the whole building fell over sideways onto Filtermans Hall and the moment Frame lands on top. Clearly the building was hulled out then the columns of the moment frame were kicked out by the spreading debris pile.
Talk about phone calls from the WTC on 9/11.
The interesting thing about Flight 77 is that they overshot the Pentagon at first, and they made a huge turnaround nearly putting the plane at like an 85 degree angle. So they did infact overshoot, they maybe even had a different impact plan and changed last minute. Idk. But all I know is that had to turn back around which gave them plenty of room to descend
Much of the towers turned into dust, read Where Did The Towers Go? By Judy Wood, it’s a great read and one of the best explanations for what happened to the towers.
This! This is the dumbest conspiracy theory to date! You win, congratulations.
I guess we're just going to pretend the massive pieces of debris that can be clearly seen in virtually any photo of the aftermath don't exist.
@@Oldschooldan1 maybe u should read the book first before u make that comment clueless one.
@@zackakai5173 the debris pile is too small, that and the slurry wall was pretty much intact after the twin collapses. Don’t u find that odd?
@@AnixCo1990 I've seen it. It's the only engineering paper I've read that looks like a comic book. Wood is the laughing stock of the scientific community. Even other Twoofer laugh at her. Death rays from space..... Bahahahahaaaaaaaaaa.
Video idea: What if the Sears(Willis) Tower in Chicago was hit by a plane on 9/11 like the twin towers of the wtc were. Would it collapse like the twins did or it would have survived due to how it's structure is built. The reason I'm suggesting this idea is because sometime ago I've heard that the terrorist originally planned to target the sears tower as well but then decided to only go for the twins, the pentagon and the white house.
Yeah, the Bojinka Plot involved the WTC AND Sears Tower (along with Transamerica Pyramid and several others.)
People will be presented with the fact that Flight 77 crashed into the Pentagon, a building 77 feet tall and on the 77th meridian, 77 minutes after takeoff at 777 feet/second, and still call it a coincidence.
The Pentagon ; 71 feet (22 m)
this according to wikipedia but on britannica it says 77 feet hmmmm
@@Mere-Lachaiselongue the internet has messed with its height ever since people noticed that a few years ago
It would be more curious if those were the exact figures.
Yes, those are, by definition, coincidences
@@mikero6225 took off at 8:20, crashed at 9:37 (77 minutes), it's at 77.05 deg W, it was traveling at 530 mph (530*5280/60/60=777.333 ft/sec). The only figure that's debatable is the height, but even without that, those are some remarkable "coincidences".
The pentagon was most likely because it was the end still is the military headquarters. My thought has always been they wanted more damage done to the pentagon.
It’s quite odd how the most surveillanced building in the World they only show one Dinky Footage.
the screen netting reference is almost a word for word parroting of an engineer on a 9/11 documentary a few years back referring to the columns and the core of buildings as a screen netting. remember that conspiracy theorists always parrot some random things they hear in passing and go with it because it sounds right to them. He wasn't mistaking them for the empire state building, he was just repeating some shit he heard which makes it worse in a way because he's so confident and wrong
Twoofers were always fools.
The longer I live the more I realize just how truly massive the world trade center was. Its almost inconceivible to me as someone who has never been too a city as large as New York.
dont know if it was mentioned here already but i heared a plausbile one that isnt even reliant on a conspiracy and supported by the incident report: molten aluminum that gets into contact with water becommes a explosive and there is confirmation of molten aluminum from the airframes in the report. two experts in the handling and safety in alimunim recycling plants in norway and the US independently of each other came to the conclusion that the tower might have fallen from a explosion caused by the molten airframes coming into contact with water in the floors directly underneath the impact points.
No I already discussed that with Dr. Greening, there is a way an Aluminum reaction can occur but it wouldn't have been possible in the Twin Tower's and no evidence for it.
The exterior walls are what that account talking about. It came from an interview with a building designer.
Where are the renderings?
YES
I'VE BEEN WANTING DG TO COVER STUPID THEORIES
Thanks for the video.
I wouldn't be surprised if they undershot their intended aim point at the Pentagon. Hitting towards the center would do more damage. I think that they may have wanted to hit higher and just missed.
The one thought that I have for the twin towers is that maybe they had someone deliver some packages that would have made the towers burn more. For instance, a palate of oxygen cylinders delivered anywhere near where the planes hit would eventually rupture due to heat or be destroyed by the impact. Mixing pure oxygen into fire would make the fire burn hotter. Maybe they had additional terrorists who dressed as deliverymen and took something like that to the towers. Maybe they disguised the cylinders and sent them through UPS. Even if they were discovered, people would most likely write off the problem as a mistake.
Another point that people seem to forget is that the towers had to have a great deal of electricity running all of those floors of offices. When the power lines were first cut, they likely arced. I'm sure that there was some highly burnt steel as the arcing electricity reached steel structures in the towers. That wouldn't be the result of conspiracy. That would be the result of any disaster of similar scale.
Try explaining the logic of building 7. The official story makes zero sense. Senior architects & engineers all over the world are 100% certain major fuckery occurred with building 7.
When the towers fell the debris struck tower 7 causing structural damage which caused it to collapse.
@@daviddavis6975 you are partially correct but the news claims fires broke down the structure of the building. For fires to cause a building to free fall almost in a demolition type manner 5 hours after the twin towers, that doesn’t add up. With what the building housed, that’s another story
@@daviddavis6975God himself could come down and explain it, and still there would be plenty that just reject it. It was too big and traumatic for anyone to really wrap their heads around, causes be damned.
@@daviddavis6975how?? And why did no other buildings near by fall just building 7 and it's not even that close
@@johnjimmies8256 because their explanation is a bit off. 7WTC was damaged by the collapse of 1WTC, but that's not what doomed the building. What doomed the building was that said damage triggered a fire, which then burned out of control across multiple floors for the next eight hours (which is beyond the rating of fireproofing used in buildings like that at the time).
I suspect that had it not caught fire, it would have eventually been torn down like the Deutsche Bank Building (which sustained damage from the collapse of 2WTC, but didn't catch fire and thus didn't collapse).
Remember, NIST told us that fires bringing down a skyscraper was a new phenomenon.
And people bought that crap.
That's because under normal circumstances skyscrapers has both passive and active fire abatement. In the case of WTC 1&2 neither existed that day. IN the case of WTC 7 it only had passive abatement and it was only rated for 3 hours; the building burned for 7. NIST was not surprised the bldg collapsed. Since 9/11 several high-rise blgds have collapsed from fire, thus proving NIST correct.
@@Oldschooldan1 The details of NIST’s computer model of building 7’s collapse are being withheld for “National Security” purposes.
@@Oldschooldan1ahhh you mean NIST who firstly denied that building 7 fell at freefall then were challenged and admitted it did free fall for over 2 seconds of it's collapse. That can only happen if all of it's columns are removed at the same time
@@coolyoutubename16 Well, it's clear you never read the report. First off, NIST never denied that the bldg fell close to free fall. They just didn't mention it in their draft release, because it really wasn't that important. It didn't change their conclusion at all. They explained it in their final release. In fact, it actually supports their theory. You would know this if you actually read the report. Thanks for playing...
@@Oldschooldan1 "it supports their theory" - so that's all they have. A theory 😂. Also, they didn't mention freefall because it wasn't important? What?? It's the ONLY time in history a fire has caused a building to go into freefall. That is absolutely huge information and only those covering up the truth would claim it's insignificant. You cannot have freefall of a structure without removing the support of that structure at the same time, not a slow gradual fire
Judy Wood presents evidence. None of which has been dunked
Dr Judy woods has a great book called Where'd the Towers Go?
Washington street lightposts in general come in 2 sizes, 28 foot and a half feet, and 36 and a half feet. Their statistics, not mine.
And this is not thinking dumb. Its a possibility. And anything is possible
My friend did acid during 9/11 in nyc.
He’s not the redditor who posted about it.
But it fucked him up pretty hard.
He’s doing great now though
Oh man, I read that post. That poor guy, makes me feel horrible for your friend. Ive taken such a flight twice myself, both times were great... But I could only imagine the terrible depths of darkness and despair one would be plunged into witnessing this via Lucy.
How many people saw this while on acid or something similar? That's two that I've seen so far.
@@jacoblott1617 would you like me to share his story? I’d be happy to, it’s just long. But def worth the share if you wanna hear it.
A lot of them are right? More like 0.001 percent it's a very small margin
That X acct is terrible. I got tired of debunking it daily.
X is an absolute sewage pit of conspiracy theories so insane they almost defy comprehension
I will forever believe it was an inside job.
Ok just don’t preach it unto others that’s all
Freedom of Speech, buddy.
Dr Judy Wood is the truth
@@mrandrossguy9871Everyone is entitled to their opinions you can believe why you want. Just know our government is not so innocent in the world as it makes it out to be. Go back to Vietnam and the CIA and on and on. Not everything is always as it seems either. Just saying.
It is your God given right to stay ignorant.
It 's also like there was a Mandela Effect with airplanes . There is even evidence. And what exactly is it? This is what the planes were originally red and blue Boeing .Red in my opinion from the top and blue at the bottom . There is a video of a woman saying that a plane with a red and blue color allegedly flew and crashed into a tower .
Somebody stop him!
I am skeptical of the 7th world trade because the world financial center is closer than 7 wtc so why the other didn’t collapse y’know?
Pentagon is definitely wild like how
Read the Structural Engineer’s report. Then do the math, B7 was where the GOLD was. Then it wasn’t!
I've read the engineering reports and looked at the math it all looks good to me. Perhaps you could show us where their math was wrong. I would say start with the load calculations for the floor systems and go for there. The gold was stored under WTC4 not 6. It belonged to the Swiss bank and they recovered all of it. There are photos of it being removed.
Why don't you actually cite what you're talking about instead of just leaving comments that basically amount to "dO uR rEeSuRch"
They didn’t do 9/11 over some gold under a building which it wasn’t even.
Mexican tourist...
Pilots for 9/11 Truth have an interesting video about thr Pentagon and Flight 77. The weirdest thing with the Pentagon is the trajectory that Flight 77 took on its descent
The Pentagon wasn't an easy target with how low it was, I'm a little shocked they went that route rather than having flight 77 go for another easier to hit skyscraper (Transamerica Pyramid, Sears Tower, Empire State Building) or the White House/Capitol Building (whichever one flight 93 wasn't targeting).
White House is harder to reach than Pentagon. Bin Laden target nr 1 was White House but hijackers thought its too difficult
You’re assuming that the way the plane hit the pentagon was the way they intended. Maybe that wasn’t where they actually wanted to hit.
@@giraffezebra2698you think they attack America and not attack a base?
@@SCP_3008_Employee hitting it from that angle, possibly going for the capitol or the white house. Take your pick. Those were not the only planes. ATC’s got those planes out of the air fast.
Are there any other kind of ginger? Summer is a stressful time for out kind as tha glowing ball in the sky is trying to bake our kind to a crisp.
I'm glad I unfollowed him long ago
Conspiracy theories about 9/11 crack me up for the most part because the amount of people that would have to be bound and gagged to keep that major of an event secret and not spill the beans this many years later is incredible it's almost crazy any type of government conspiracy there it would have been leaked by now the US government can barely keep a secret about its own internal affairs let alone an event of that magnitude
They’ve kept the JFK assassination quiet for over 60 years.
Secret societies exist and persist. The information is already out there. You just don’t think so because state media has underreported, downplayed and veiled it entirely and major institutions.
So rather than look at the evidence, you've reduced it to whataboutisms
Think about this. The Manhattan project had over 100,000 members and not even the president knew it was going on
@1:50-1:56 You make the dude's point @ 0:27. You're not disagreeing with him. The "mosquito net" is not any theory, but how the buildings were actually designed. The buildings were designed to withstand multiple plane impacts. Architect Frank DeMartini who worked at the World Trade Center and was intimately aware of how the buildings were designed, lost his life on 911 trying to save others, and is quoted saying this ( "Frank DeMartini, World Trade Center 1973 2001" ). Steel buildings do not collapse at near freefall speed in an explosive manner due to fire alone. This is why firefighters went into the twin towers that day. The explosive nature of the collapse of WTC1 and WTC2, was captured on multiple camera angles showing steel beams shooting out into adjacent buildings, and is worthy of further investigation, considering how many lives were lost that day and how many wars have been fought since. Also, the collapse of WTC7 at freefall speed around 5:20 PM, hit by no plane, should be enough to raise one's eyebrow.
Have you seen video of WTC7 fires, one video in particular is filmed from across the road from where WTC3 was. It shows basically the entire building on fire.
@@jonathanlandau-litewski7405 So? A burning building doesn't explain why it fell at freefall acceleration
@@coolyoutubename16maybe it was burning at the corners of the building?
@@SCP_3008_Employee the corners? The building had huge steel columns around it and through the middle. They all failed at the exact same time? Fires don't burn like that
You are wrong on the collapse part. The weight load does not bear down and it does slow down as the more integral parts are reached. The energy from collapse went outwards not strictly downwards. Youve seen a game of Jenga yes no? Bc the top falls the bottom also automatically is destroyed at rate? The dumbest logic ive ever seen. You are egotistically wrong. You were sold
The very first tweet that you criticized was not just a tweet he was quoting an actual expert. Just because you dump on something it doesn't mean you disproved it you just complained about how YOU don't understand. Being a layman you wouldn't understand that's why we go to experts to understand which he or she was quoting. Look at climate change you have 99% of the scientific field agree it exists you feelings do not matter. Had you shown some sort of theory or at least an experiment to prove it wrong you would deserve credit. You are not the arbiter of physics nor acquainted with thermal studies and explosives so why are you stating an opinion. You literally don't have one you just say "no, I don't care" that's all the government has done for 23 years you're not the first and far from the last. The dumbest theories are not theories they are just blind uneducated guesses. Some think the TOWERS weren't real which having parents that worked in WTC 2 (in the 80's) is simply ridiculous and ignorant. THAT is worthy of relentless scrutiny.
It was clearly a controlled demolition. Cummon guys give your head a shake.
nah it was muslims
If you look at the army time in the bottom left corner of that video of the Twin Towers, it says 21:31 which is 9:31, so it could be legit.
I asked for more conspiracies and u received. I’m delusional enough to believe u did it cuz I asked
There was nothing but dust at site day after. Dan Rather even asked where the f the building pieces were the next day. 2 million tons of "naturally fallen debris" lol gone over night with few structural pieces remaining. It's safe to say some.odd sh9t happened that day. Dude you are egotistically wrong. A tower doesn't need a wider base to be stronger at bottom. A high energy weapon was used.You think you know about the tech that the government uses or has developed?Just ask yourself that question and if you say and answer to yourself.Yes you shouldn't be allowed out in public
Erm what the sigma
Just so you know, the DOE sold nuclear demolition plan to the WTC developers. They did not lie about it either as they called that area ground zero on that day.
There are a lot of things that don't add up and I don't believe anything our government says. The simple fact that AA and United had huge shorts put on during the week leading up to 9/11 tells me someone knew in advance and it was not just people planning it either.
e
wow very early
Second :D
First Comment
Being a Trump fan, I thought you’d be into all of these conspiracies
That’s just a ridiculous generalization.
@@conpop6924 No, I think that generalization can be applied to his hardcore followers
@@theduffguy Dude, your wife's boyfriend is calling!!
Shocker. Biden supporter unaware to the world around him.
@@Mere-LachaiselongueMike loves to watch😂😂
I think i dumbest thing i ever heard someone say was that 9/11 never happened 🤣
dis information shit. cia cutout
Man this was weak.