Eric Weinstein: The Future of Science
VloĆŸit
- Äas pĆidĂĄn 21. 05. 2024
- Join my mailing list briankeating.com/list to win a real 4 billion year old meteorite! All .edu emails in the USA đșđž will WIN!
How can we measure the importance of scientific work? Why do we reject new ideas? And is string theory really where physics stops? I had the pleasure of discussing the state of science with none other than the longtime friend of the podcast, Eric Weinstein. Enjoy!
If you liked this clip, check out our full interview: âą Eric Weinstein: What i...
Additional resources:
âĄïž Follow me on your fav platforms:
âïž Twitter: / drbriankeating
đ CZcams: czcams.com/users/DrBrianKeatin...
đ Join my mailing list: briankeating.com/list
âïž Check out my blog: briankeating.com/cosmic-musings/
đïž Follow my podcast: briankeating.com/podcast
Into the Impossible with Brian Keating is a podcast dedicated to all those who want to explore the universe within and beyond the known.
Make sure to subscribe so you never miss an episode!
#intotheimpossible #briankeating #ericweinstein - VÄda a technologie
Stay tuned for a new conversation with Eric coming next weekâŠ
I think we need to go back to rÂČ and the three dimensional physics of the Inverse Square Law. Even back to the spherical 4ÏrÂČ geometry Huygensâ Principle of 1670. The Universe could be based on the most simple geometry that forms the potential for evermore complexity. Forming not just physical complexity, but also the potential for evermore-abstract mathematics.
I literally see it in this generation of people who grew up on phones they all act the same they don't take action when action is necessary they won't act they won't do anything even when a inevitability is knocking at the door and is going to disrupt their entire life if they don't act they still won't act until their life is completely disrupted! This is short form videos wreaking havoc on the attention span of the population and making it so people are incapable of seeing inevitabilities ahead of their trajectory...
Better be new and not clip of old podcast,
Only A.I. can help us catch up to where we shouldâve been a long time ago .
@@fredod4669 Dream on. We'll never solve any of these problems. They've been studying electromagnetism for 200 years and still don't know how electricity works. I'd argue that there is no such thing as science, that all we've really had is cutting-edge engineering. That's great for figuring out how to cram more data on a fiber optic cable but because we don't know any of the causal factors, we're just guessing and can only move forward through pain staking experiment and testing (and that's slow and expensive).
Stated another way, we pretend to have certainty that we don't really have. People believe things based on non-conscious emotional brain systems and then invent rationalizations after the fact to make it sound like they're critical thinkers. And educated big-brains are even worse at this then regular people. This was shown by James Burnham 100 years ago. Who would have thought that political philosophers would be practicing real science (searching for disconfirmatory evidence and able to make predictions 100 years out)?
I'm not crazy. I'd accept the argument that chemistry is real science. But if you look into solid state physics to try and find out how free electrons move inside a metallic conductor you've got to see these guys are just hoping and guessing.
Max Planck paraphrased quote: "New ideas are not advanced by convincing the skeptic; but funeral by funeral."
Can you put the date of the original discussion either in your title or description detail?
Yeah, isnât this YEARS old?
@@bobross7005 Link in the description. This is an ad for an upcoming interview. I wouldn't mind if this was on national TV 24/7.
The most interesting science now happens in parapsychology labs.
Are you going to do a debunking video on the Terrence Howard Joe Rogan episode?
I donât think it can be debunked bc the math is mathing!
cant
So many obvious errors it debunks itself.
Will you host the EPIC discussion between Terrance Howard and Eric Weinstein?!?!
Terrence Howard
I think that people outside academia might push theoritical physics forward one day
I doubt that, but then nobody will. Academia has become entangled in bureaucracy and h-index chasing.
@@cookymonstr7918 just remember that Einstein was not an academic when he made his great discoveries
@@kokomanation Right. One every 120 years or so...
Since The Great Weinberg's passing it seems that only Ed Witten, The M-Theory Man, can give authoritative LEGITITAMACY to Weinstein's Geometric Unity & Abraham's Tetryonics. When will the day come for 70 year old Ed Witten granting an audience for Eric Weinstein and Kelvin Abraham? WHEN? I pray for the day!
There are a few that I love to listen to and two of them are in this video
I would love for you to interview Terrence Howard
Great
Thanks so much! *What was your favorite takeaway from this conversation?* _Please join my mailing list to get _*_FREE_*_ notes & resources from this show! Click_ đ briankeating.com/list
When are you going to have Carver Mead on?
It's not people that have to be excluded - it's ideas. The focus should be on the merits of what's being said rather than the merits of the person.
"Only ideas that have merit should be discussed"... sure.... But in a world where many scientists are corrupt, who has enough merit to be trusted to identify ideas that have merit? "Turtle all the way down"?? Nobody can develop sufficient knowledge in all fields of science to be able to identify "worthy ideas" ideas on their own. We desperately need scientists we can trust, not as "holy holder of truth" but as modest moderator of worthy discussions pursuing truth". And it's really hard to find them these days....
Excellent đ Todah Rabah thank you
I agree with almost everything Eric says except when he says that string theory is wrong. It is very probably right but we can now see that it is going to be a lot harder to test than people had assumed in the beginning. The scientific is a human social construct and the universe is not obliged to make the process easy for our limited technology.
We need new ideas and so we need everyone to contribute, not just scientists from every branch but also layman people.. itâs time for everyone to show their work to the world because reality is created with the mind of every ONE.
Spot on Eric. We are dismissing ourselves into oblivion
Very well said about the world needs to be more open to creative people Eric Eric Wright
Are they scientists or are they politicians ? Or neither ...
"When I was at Harvard" ~
Is that the same Harvard , that Students can't Address an Envelope to their Mother Eric ??
Can't wait for the two of you to talk again, for a moment I thought this was it. đ
I'm in!!!
Isnât eco health alliance under investigation right now?
I love crazy!
Read them all!
1 representative for every 30000; when the population is 333 million, that is 11100 representatives, and not 435.
Brain talking with Eric is always going to mean a good day.
"i have some qualms" ~
Eric Weinstein
Isnât the job finding signal from noise???
Good stuff.
Thanks so much! *What was your favorite takeaway from this conversation?* _Please join my mailing list to get _*_FREE_*_ notes & resources from this show! Click_ đ briankeating.com/list
@@DrBrianKeating Eric is right, the discourse has been hijacked in many fields, including science. He recognize that the distrust is growing because of it. Asside from a few of you guys, scientists are seen as Priest these day. As you said it well, science advance enough is indistinguishable from magic. You need warrior for a war, not priests.
Love Eric! I don't get the haters. đ
Right, I don't even agree with him on a lot of stuff and yet I respect the man, I don't get the hate he gets, maybe I don't know what they know...or they're just unfair đ€·ââïž
Same
Why do you talk about haters if you don't know what they're hating?
@@user-re9mz2bt1e what? What's the problem with someone stating they don't get Weinstein haters...
@@tomo2807 Maybe they should learn?
Thank you eric.i know well never meet but im glad ur smart enough to push us all
From 2022..
While talking about science, only Eric can bring in String Theory, Nancy Pelosi and Joe Rogan and throw in Urban Institute and Brianâs kids. đ WTF đź
He's talking down to another PhD and doesn't even realize it. Big blind spot.
His brother Bret is a pleasure to listen to.
The future of science is that AGI does it all.
If Einstein was dropping his papers today he'd get shouted down, called an idiot by TikTok and cancelled. Probably over lack of 'diversity'.
If we keep going this way we might never have another Einstein, just a bunch of Greenes and Kakus hawking strings like it's Brawndo.
main media and main social media are there to provide official interpretation . Nothing else is authorised
Weinstein Keating 2024
Knot theory is knot a theory
Good podcast Brian. Can you have people on that I don't feel like I've had a root canal after watching it?
Want to share with you my "theory" about dark matter. it seems like a good place for it.
I think there is a certain limit to the transfer of energy between two points. particles.
I think it is strongly related to the speed of light.
Đt the moment it looks like this - if two points move faster than the speed of light relative to each other, they cannot interact directly and transfer energy to each other. those. pass through one another without interaction, as if they do not exist for each other.
Thus we get, dark matter is space or particles moving faster than the speed of light relative to us, our space. We see their interaction thanks to points and particles, whose relative speed to us and dark matter is less than the speed of light.
because the speed of light has a strong connection with mass and energy, most likely they also participate in this limit.
This is not only a "theory" about dark matter but also the key to the multiverse, the transmission of information and travel faster than the speed of light.
This is more like my speculation than a theory, but I like it. Simple and elegant.
Can be tested, most likely, in a hadron collider, passing accelerated particles through the lightest and coolest possible particles.
I want to hear your opinion about this.
The known, fundamental phenomenon of dilation (sometimes called gamma or y) explains galaxy rotation curves/dark matter. Mass that is dilated is smeared through spacetime relative to an outside observer. It's the phenomenon behind the phrase "mass becomes infinite at the speed of light". Time dilation is just one aspect of dilation, it's not just time that gets dilated. A graph illustrates its squared nature, dilation increases at an exponential rate the closer you get to the speed of light.
Dilation will occur wherever there is an astronomical quantity of mass such the centers of very high mass stars and the overwhelming majority of galaxy centers.
The mass at the center of our own galaxy must be dilated. This means that there is no valid XYZ coordinate we can attribute to it, you can't point your finger at something that is smeared through spacetime. More precisely, everywhere you point is equally valid. In other words that mass is all around us.
Dilation does not occur in galaxies with low mass centers because they do not have enough mass to achieve relativistic velocities. It has recently been confirmed in 6 very low mass galaxies including NGC 1052-DF2 and DF4 to have no dark matter, in other words they have normal rotation rates. This also explains why all planets and all binary stars have normal rotation rates, not 3 times normal
James Lindsay has entered the chat.
Great conversation. Eric is the ultimate dinner guest.
Thanks so much! *What was your favorite takeaway from this conversation?* _Please join my mailing list to get _*_FREE_*_ notes & resources from this show! Click_ đ briankeating.com/list
@@DrBrianKeating Science depends on us telling the truth. Technology can interfere with that, as social media goes after people for saying things they don't like...so some people back off, from social pressure. Eric says everyone with a new idea is treated as a crazy person...as if that's a bad thing. No it's not. It's essential to embrace the craziness:
Ed Dutton the Jolly Heretic has tons of data on genius. One of the strong personality predictors for genius is being very disagreeable, much like a criminal is very disagreeable. So a genius is a criminal with a high IQ, Ed says. We all need to be OK with people thinking we are crazy. If you have a genius idea, you might be crazy, or just very disagreeable. Being thought of as crazy should be a badge of honor. We need to train ourselves to listen to others, then disregard them if you think they are wrong. But, accept a difference of opinion. Just don't let it stop you.
Science is in it's Karen Phase. Karen Science, driven by social media. We politicized science already. My objection to the global warming agenda is not the science. It was the weaponization of science for political purposes and social control....via media. We're all hooked up to media, it's like being in a global village, we are all under the eye of Karen. We need to teach people that being disagreeable is OK. Masculine traits like courage should be encouraged.
My disagreeable idea for this is, women evolved as far more likely to be agreeable, far less likely to be disagreeable. That's why 99% of all people in jail are men, so are 99% of all geniuses. As feminist Camille Paglia put it long before me, "You have more male Mozarts than female Mozarts, because you have more male Jack the Rippers than female ones." I agree. Unpacking the impact of biology and technology and not let it screw everything up, will take a while.
Eric is a great conversationalist. Dave Rubin and his husband had a supper with Donald Trump. Dave said he enjoyed that evening. Eric would be a great guy for Trump to invite to dinner. Don't exclude people: Invite Sam Harris along, then bring the Trump kids. Sam can test out his theory of Donald Trump being a supposed monster. He can tell Ivanka what he thinks of her dad. To her face.
Im at the point i know im shadow banned and ideas stolen, atleast theyre used while im alive,but i cant create them and sell them!
The future of science is looking for aliens that arenât there and looking for matter that isnât there and looking inflatons/inflators that arenât there.
Good work people, but still I was expecting a more serious analytic approach to Terrence work. People brave enough to work with mr T are the ones to become filthy rich.
â€
3 year old podcast
âWhen someone points at the moon, look at the moon, not the finger â Bruce Lee
'It's like a finger pointing to the moon, don't concentrate on the finger or you will miss all the heavenly glory' - Bruce Lee (enter the dragon) confusionism
"when someone points out the moon missions were done by pedo lying masons, the "educated folks" try shut the non pedo lying masons down" Reality.
The Cavendish Experiment broke all of physics. So the science of physics hasn't even started yet.
Everyone is destroyed for having an idea.
Eric sounds a whole lot like Sam Harris here. A little too much of the end justifies the means.
High level programers
Eric is awesome. You can see the nerd problem here though. Brian doesnât relate at all to Terrance this must interpret. In math and itâs relative symbols of course there is a zero, in the actual physical world thereâs so such thing as nothing đ
Science is DOMED!
Astronomers agree!
First we need more A.I. so we can catch up to our better future 2nd we need money to be obsolete that way us humans wonât put so much thought on how to pay your rent and food and use that energy on more important things like saving the world 3rd we need better schools for our future kids but the A.I. is our only way out of this big mess we have been put in . Tell me where do I fit in this solution ?
Why everybody who studied some math, render themselves a scientist ?
I think the people you je(
Excellent show.. It certainly is easy to become cynical about peer rejection generated from knee-jerk dismissals of original and compelling ideas, ESPECIALLY when they come from thinkers not constrained by traditional beliefs.. These biases have flourished within scientific academia forever. Still, if the ideas are clever enough and make novel predictions that can be observed and verified, eventually, they become accepted and given the recognition once denied.. A humble opinion.. Peace.
Everything is spoken into existence which requires language to map well with reality. The unseen problem is that our linear language system doesnât map well with the multidimensional world and the multidimensional problems we face.
whole lot of nothing said here
Dogma won...
is The Portal Podcast even a thing anymore? sad that it seems not to be
What existential threat to humanity is he talking about? He never says it, does he?
Shouldn't we need to clean up this mess first? : czcams.com/video/_f_Lq1ktpGc/video.htmlsi=L1jTvW4gjHGSwo__ đ
Why repost 2 year old content I agree with Eric, same shit over and over again!!
I thought this Channel was doomed.
@eric im a 38 year old man. i have just 1 child and am divorced. doing my best out here to teach my daughter everything i've learned in this life so far. so far; ive been able to provide a life to her 10, no, 100x better than the one i was raised into... i care about her, and her children. she's only 4.5 years old. but i'm going to do everything i can to teach her logic, sound reasoning, and common sense; so perhaps she may stand on the shoulder of giants. so i dont think while ppl of my cohort are trash people; doesn't make us all trash people/fathers.
Tell her that only fans make a more money that being an attorney or doctor
He's GenX. He's referring to Boomers and the Lost Generation, who were notoriously evil. Congratulations for not being a jackass, but no one cares about Millennials -- you're not even a factor in this discussion.
Ahh yess the guy who thinks everyone else is wrong but him and only HE can solve these problems đ
I love Eric Weinstein, he cuts through the BS
Only narrow-minded materialist scientists are doomed. For those who are willing to accept spiritual science, the future is so bright, you might need to wear shades to keep your eyes wide shut.
yeah, mister Weinstein speaks for himself LOL
Prove Terrence wrong please. If your glass is full you cannot receive new liquid without tipping old liquid out first.
By the need to prove him wrong? If he is right could possibly change the future of mankind for the better
@@kayhawkins5925 hes not ; all u have to do is have an IQ above 40
â@@kayhawkins5925 Exactly
âwhen i was at Harvardâ is a joke now - you guys are clowns at Harvard
Getting so over these goofy intellectuals that say alot but do nothing...
I believe in Jesus đâ
Know the message, Jesus if existed doesnât need or require your beliefâŠâŠ
@@jasonveritas9441 thank you captain obvious đ«Ą
Since Copernicus no one with new ideas has ever had an easy time of itâŠimagine walking into a room full of old men who have spent their entire lives perfecting a theory or a way of doing somethingâŠand you stroll in and in five minutes you and your new idea prove to them that they have wasted their whole lives in the pursuit of BSâŠ.of course they are going to run you out on a pole and burn you at the stake. lol duh
eric u need a camera that isn't attached to your god damn monitor.
How many people with power are listening to this?