Christian Sons/Boys and The Effeminate Christianity.
Vložit
- čas přidán 8. 07. 2024
- Video Description: The Effeminate Christianity.
Get Access To Our Audio Course: "God Hates A Coward: 5 Ways Christian Men Differentiate Themselves From The World" by supporting the channel ON BUY ME A COFFEE
OR
Get a Digital-Comic Book Each Month + Access To The Audio Course: "God Hates A Coward: 5 Ways Christian Men Differentiate Themselves From The World Today" by becoming A MEMBER on BUY ME A COFFEE.
Go To: www.buymeacoffee.com/peopleof...
OR
Just-Join Our Email List and Get A Digital-Comic Book.
Follow This Link: the-republic.ck.page/7e91bbab68
#Peopleoftheway#ChristianMen#Masculinity
Eastern Orthodox Christianity is a very masculine expression of the faith...☦
True. Please keep it like that. Don't let the effeminacy infiltrate. It is difficult to remove.
@@PeopleOfTheWay-Today if we follow Old country/Byzantine tradition not a latin-frankish one. In everything; chants, icons, appearance of clergy(untrimmed beard and hair). Unfortunately some orthodox view this as external thing, no, this is the fruit of hard labor and asceticism.
Too bad it's just a false religion
@@Oozy9Millimeetah nice try, not today Satan
@@johnjelinek3983 is the Orthodox church the body of Christ?
Kindness is from the Spirit
Yes, so is rebuke. What is your point?
And so is to "judge with righteousness"... so, what's your point?! Plus, being kind also means to speak truth. Being "nice" is differnt than being kind.
@@zemaria847 Asked and answered in the video.
Well said brother!
As a Jewish bro, I completely agree. I support masculine Christianity.
Shalom.
@@PeopleOfTheWay-Today 🤝 Shalom
I don't know what tongues have to do with the subjects but the rest I agree
Personally, I don't think kindness and masculinity are things that can't exist at the same time, because kindness is a fruit of the spirit. Also, to your point of tongues are mumbling, tongues are a gift of the spirit, which are from God. However, I do agree with you that there needs to be more of a focus on scripture, and sound doctrine. Because too often we focus on our feelings, over the truth of the word of God.
you w omen really know nothing.
What I actually said is that I believe kindness and masculinity can exist together. Maybe the phrasing was a bit confusing on my part, my apologies. I still believe that tongues and the gifts are for today, but I guess we'll just have to agree to disagree. Have a great day yourself!
@@gracedanielleinchrist Oh true you did say that. So fair enough on that one. On tongues though. It is not an agree to disagree type of matter. It is about doing what scripture views as correct because if you are not correct you are just mumbling and not doing it God's way. Not forgetting even the occultists do it that way...?
That has to give a faithful believer pause right...?
@PeopleOfTheWay-Today I actually agree with you, in the sense that yes, people fake tongues and there is a lot of deception regarding them. Should we be mumbling on and on in our prayers? No, because the Father already knows what we need before we say it. Whether it is our personal prayer language to God, or a message in tongues, translated to English/another language, I believe it is for today. At my church, sometimes tongues are translated into a warning or encouragement for the church. I know the tongues of the church in Acts had a different use, but I wouldn’t go as far to say they are invalid because of the times. I believe that the Holy Spirit and the gifts are still active today.
In all things, we are to be Holy Spirit lead, and as you said we shouldn’t try to do our own thing. Just moving as the Lord leads!
plenty of them.
whats up with the screen?
What do you mean?
You usually have great video teachings.
It is important to discuss areas that are in need of growth or change, but not wise to degrade an aspect of the Bible that is clear, but one may disagree with - namely you stating that Speaking in Tongues as written of in scripture, is mumbling.
Unless the Holy Spirit has you speaking an actual foreign language to actual people that understand that language, then it sounds like waste of time doctrines of demons.
I appreciate you comment. I would agree that the bible is clear. Clear in that tongues where a particular manifestation at a particular time. They were clear and recognisable languages that people could understand and interpret. Tongues haves not been a big part of church history since those early days in "Acts". They re-emerge in the early 1900s in the form we have them today - as non-languages.
I believe the bible is clear. That tongues have clearly ceased.
Note: that this form of tongues which is not like the biblical description of tongues. This non-language type. Is evident in eastern religions, spiritualism and the occult. This non-language tongues is also used by those people. Biblical tongues were different. Thank you, have a great day.
Research tongues more yourself and get back to me.
@@PeopleOfTheWay-Todayisn't christianity an eastern religion??? 😂😂😂
@@pattmahiney Sure, middle-eastern. When we speak of "eastern religions" though. It is understood to be referring to the far east - China, japan and South-Asia (sub-continent) India, Sri-Lanka. Meaning they emerged in that part of the world.
Religions from the middle-east are usually referred to as semitic, middle-eastern, Arabic or monotheistic religions.
Thanks for asking.
@@PeopleOfTheWay-Today Do you believe that all the gifts of the Holy Spirit have ceased?
ROMANS 1:18-32
There's some truth to what you say but lets not forget what is perhaps the most radical and unflinching way to embrace the teachings of Christ, which is to directly confront our own egos, or the "natural man", put it aside, even kill it, and become a man of God. You can be an incredibly strong man but still not have the strength to be able to control your own ego much less directly confront it. It was Christ who said to turn the other cheek to the man that would hurt you for no reason whatsoever, and to give everything you own to the man that would rob you of everything you own. He chose to use these examples for a specific reason and it seems to have a lot to do with taming the natural man and our egos. I think a good test for this is to seek out those that we tend to disagree with a lot and regardless of who they are to show humility towards them, to recognize that we are on equal ground with them, that we are sinners just as they are and to realize that they have something to teach us. Its incredible how hard it an be to simply say something like "I'm wrong and you we're right." Everyone thinks they're strong until its time to say those words out loud especially to the people that we otherwise dislike and disagree with. We certainly don't have to agree to others beliefs, just like how we aren't agreeing with the thief that robs us just because we also give him our coat off our back, but because it provides one of the most direct paths to God and in that way we help others help ourselves become like him.
The turn the other cheek I think refers more to an aggressor who has overwhelming advantage over you( in this example through law, I think the person referred to as the striker would be a roman with citizenship whom would be backed up by a corrupt legal system if you strike back). The robber would be the same I guess given his willingness to use lethal force over goods which aren't worth anywhere near a human life, either yours or his for you to defend your goods.
You're totally supposed to fight back against evil people, and enforce ethical laws, just do it wisely, and it's not wise to risk everything over a small victory.
Pretty sure you heavily misunderstood the teaching if you think the lesson is let evil have it's way with you and be a punching bag as a way to Heaven. You're supposed to fight the man who strikes you for no reason, and the thief, just not that way. If you kill the macho ego that hampers you, you're not supposed to be transformed into a placid, passive person, just fight for the right reason, but totally fight all your life against evil people.
No, are you a Christian? I ask because the way you discuss scripture is very "new age"... Mix that with all the talk of the ego, no. Not Christian. You twist scripture and put a very new age spin on it. Are you a Christian...?
@@PeopleOfTheWay-Today This is very very far from New Age. This is about the natural man and most importantly this is about the words of Christ as he said them when he was on Earth to say them.
You're revealing your cards here if you say you think this is New Age.
@@marcanton5357 This isn't an easy message to hear, for anyone. In fact this is the exact opposite of easy. I just try to take the words of Christ as seriously as I know how. What did Christ say? Why did he always place emphasis on becoming one, on forsaking money, on going out of your way to find exactly those people you have strong disagreements with and find a way to love them and be humble before them. Why do we often avoid this message and even recoil from it? Because its hard but at the same time very easy to see.
@@michaelbarker6460 Brother, please answer my question. Are you a Christian?
Please let this be parody! Please let this be parody!
A parody of what?
@@PeopleOfTheWay-Todayoof
@@pattmahiney Aaargh, I to have read a comic. Please explain what this would be a parody of in your mind. Thanks.
Haha, your ramblings go well with the AI-generated image. They're both worth the same.
What in your mind do you think you are saying...? What point do you think you are actually making...? Thanks I guess... there are some valuable points in here and the image captures the gist of the points as well I thought.
Q: Are you a Christian?
Lol
Interesting.