Why North Korea Can't Build An ICBM (yet)

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 7. 09. 2017
  • The first 500 people to use this link will get a 2 month free trial of skillshare: skl.sh/realengineering3
    Listen to our new podcast at:
    Showmakers CZcams channel at: goo.gl/Ks1WMp
    Itunes: itun.es/us/YGA_ib.c
    RSS and Libsyn Audio is available on our site: www.showmakers.fm/
    Get your Real Engineering shirts at: store.dftba.com/collections/r...
    Editing Laptop: amzn.to/2tipgoI
    Camera: amzn.to/2ucfWEa
    Microphone: amzn.to/2uCF8pS
    Patreon:
    www.patreon.com/user?u=282505...
    Facebook:
    / realengineering1
    Instagram:
    / brianjamesmcmanus
    Twitter:
    / fiosracht
    Website:
    www.RealEngineering.net
    My Patreon Expense Report:
    goo.gl/ZB7kvK
    Thank you to my patreon supporters: Adam Flohr, darth patron, Zoltan Gramantik, Henning Basma, Karl Andersson, Mark Govea, Mershal Alshammari, Hank Green, Tony Kuchta, Jason A. Diegmueller, Chris Plays Games, William Leu, Frejden Jarrett, Vincent Mooney, Ian Dundore, John & Becki Johnston. Nevin Spoljaric
    Once again thank you to Maeson for his amazing music. Check out his soundcloud here: / tracks
  • Věda a technologie

Komentáře • 2,7K

  • @RealEngineering
    @RealEngineering  Před 6 lety +1706

    I tried to approach the topic without mentioning any politics. The whole situation is incredibly complex, but the media have been blowing the threat out of proportion and I wanted to quell the insanity a little.
    If you would like to get a 2 month free trial with Skillshare, use this link: skl.sh/realengineering3

    • @Grz349
      @Grz349 Před 6 lety +8

      you mentioned reentry, but what about the EMP effect of nuclear weapons?

    • @Cal6009
      @Cal6009 Před 6 lety +6

      I'm pretty sure fissionable materials have to be triggered in a certain way and that just being in an explosion wouldn't detonate it. Either way, the DPRK isn't smart enough to think of an attack like that.

    • @Hive0100
      @Hive0100 Před 6 lety +11

      That North Korea can not build a ICBM is wrong, because the NK got all technology from Ukraine.There are article out, that experts are sure, that the rocket engine is made in Ukraine. And i know that North Korea bought a lot of Tanks and other stuff from the Ukraine.

    • @Cal6009
      @Cal6009 Před 6 lety +12

      That technology is decades old, far behind the rest of the world if it even works at all.

    • @eviltonz7920
      @eviltonz7920 Před 6 lety +3

      Günther Lehmann also I believe there was a CIA assessment claiming that there Re-entry vehicles would of preformed adequately if actually flown towards actually u.s targets instead of them firing them straight up although there accuracy is still bad.

  • @BFfanMAN
    @BFfanMAN Před 6 lety +1481

    Does skillshare have classes on building ICBMs??

  • @djolly3438
    @djolly3438 Před 6 lety +526

    Make a new video “how North Korea has made an ICBM”

    • @ronnierabell1
      @ronnierabell1 Před 5 lety +8

      No they haven't.

    • @JoeMama-vj1uw
      @JoeMama-vj1uw Před 5 lety +54

      Ronnie Rabell lmao they literally have

    • @Dev-In-Denver123
      @Dev-In-Denver123 Před 4 lety

      HAHAHA yesss

    • @Dev-In-Denver123
      @Dev-In-Denver123 Před 4 lety +13

      @@ronnierabell1 Hahaha why just cuz you don't like them? Just cuz they're enemies of the west? Isreal managed in the 60's. N. Koreans are smart as fuck, best hacker group on Earth, get over yourself. They've figured out intercontinental/intercountry ROCKETS *gasp*

    • @coolguy3848
      @coolguy3848 Před 4 lety +13

      @@Dev-In-Denver123 Russian hacker : Am I a floppy disk to you?

  • @staceysun5457
    @staceysun5457 Před 6 lety +851

    why did the chicken cross the road?
    because north korea's long-range missiles cant reach that far

    • @dionysus649
      @dionysus649 Před 5 lety +8

      Lmao

    • @Dev-In-Denver123
      @Dev-In-Denver123 Před 4 lety +4

      Hahaha why just cuz you don't like them? Just cuz they're enemies of the west? Isreal managed in the 60's. N. Koreans are smart as fuck, best hacker group on Earth, get over yourself. They've figured out intercontinental/intercountry ROCKETS and miniaturization *gasp*

    • @Dev-In-Denver123
      @Dev-In-Denver123 Před 4 lety +6

      @Scrim killa Are they though? I'm sure they're in poverty and any dictatorship would suck but I think about things realistically.. not just whats supplemented in my mind from the news. They have tons of buildings and roads, which we'll focus on for now, which means toonnsss of engineers, construction workers, truck drivers, material suppliers, distributors, people in offices doing the paperwork, etc. They had the same population as S. Korea when it was split in half, which means millions and millions of people. It's impossible that they don't have a large middle class, wealthy people, and of course a whole lot of poor. They have plenty of bridges, dams, and other engineering feats that would be impossible if they were this 3rd world country you speak of. Just because their govt is secretive, doesn't mean they are doing as bad as you think. They are apparently stable, with millions to feed every day with modern plumbing (a feat in itself) to boot. Use your brain and think about things with a sense of realism. Besides their tortuous slave camps, where they house generation after generation of "traitors," escapees returned by China and political prisoners, they're doing fine. People like you grow up into politicians and underestimate people like the Koreans. That's how we let this nuclear mess go on for long :/ 😔

    • @blackhole4106
      @blackhole4106 Před 4 lety +2

      @@Dev-In-Denver123 do something about it

    • @Dev-In-Denver123
      @Dev-In-Denver123 Před 4 lety

      @@blackhole4106 Well.. IDC lmao. I'd do just like Kim and Vladimir and Xi Jinping if I could too 😄. Now YOU do something about it.

  • @SirWrender
    @SirWrender Před 6 lety +60

    Great video! Nice animation of a gyroscope too

  • @musman9853
    @musman9853 Před 6 lety +148

    There's a bunch of really good vintage space videos on early ICBMs if you want a more in depth info

    • @RealEngineering
      @RealEngineering  Před 6 lety +36

      Yeap, her videos are great. Highly recommend

    • @tmkc1372
      @tmkc1372 Před 6 lety

      Real Engineering whose?

    • @helphelpimbeingrepressed9347
      @helphelpimbeingrepressed9347 Před 6 lety +4

      vintage space

    • @BillySugger1965
      @BillySugger1965 Před 6 lety +2

      Mohammad Usman You need to see Jeff Quitney's channel with old NASA and USAF released material. This one is a good beginner's guide to solving the re-entry problem: czcams.com/video/6hb9be6Sg0U/video.html

    • @tmkc1372
      @tmkc1372 Před 6 lety +1

      metalhead2508 Rob space thanks guys. :)))

  • @TheGodEmperorOfMankind_
    @TheGodEmperorOfMankind_ Před 6 lety +45

    *Next week:*
    "Breaking news, North Korea has an ICBM."

  • @rban123
    @rban123 Před 4 lety +41

    North Korea:
    I’m gonna end this man’s whole career

  • @shtpost7069
    @shtpost7069 Před 6 lety +548

    Im living in south korea and im genuinely scared but real engineering is cheering me up with videos

    • @MDPToaster
      @MDPToaster Před 6 lety +125

      CS Noob
      Don't worry NK only has enough artillery to level your capital.

    • @GetPsyched6
      @GetPsyched6 Před 6 lety +76

      Mr.Dr.Professor Toaster 11/10 No pressure

    • @tylerdurden9161
      @tylerdurden9161 Před 6 lety +26

      CS Noob nope you should be a little worried. If something goes wrong you are first to get hit because you're close. They could drop it by plane. You are out of luck buddy. Just kidding. Well you are protected with MAD (Mutual assured destruction). Or if Fat Kimy drops the first bomb then the total destruction of North Korea by USA and allies.

    • @xirensixseo
      @xirensixseo Před 6 lety +9

      so long as you arent one of 10 million in Seoul, with an unknown amount of artillery cannons pointed that way, you should be relatively safe. At least from missiles. But i think everything will be okay, and just in case, learn about the nearest bomb shelter and the best routes to it. Im praying for the peace of the two Koreas

    • @tylerdurden9161
      @tylerdurden9161 Před 6 lety

      SupremeSuccLord nothing is 100% safe. One bomber could somehowe slip through air defense around Seoul.

  • @hkntns
    @hkntns Před 6 lety +414

    How can you stop North Korea? Send Kim a box full of reese's cups

    • @STUDYALLAH365
      @STUDYALLAH365 Před 6 lety +22

      TK H Snickers

    • @TheGyaradosGamers
      @TheGyaradosGamers Před 6 lety +33

      Your Not you when your Hungry

    • @Parkskigaming
      @Parkskigaming Před 6 lety +12

      TK H only chocolate M&Ms can stop wim

    • @GhostInTheShell29
      @GhostInTheShell29 Před 6 lety +19

      That would be the best snickers commercial ever. Kim eats a snickers and goes back to being ____ (insert someone nice/respectable here) Not sure who'd be funniest.

    • @hkntns
      @hkntns Před 6 lety +4

      Kim would turn into Ken Jeong BEST IDEA EVER

  • @ConchOut
    @ConchOut Před 6 lety +160

    hah....2 months later

  • @quasimodo1914
    @quasimodo1914 Před 6 lety +541

    This video didn’t age well

    • @epikmanthe3rd
      @epikmanthe3rd Před 5 lety +25

      It is still kind of right. NK missiles have a serious issue with reliability.

    • @Dev-In-Denver123
      @Dev-In-Denver123 Před 4 lety +11

      Stupid video to begin with, it only came out a year ago. Top N. Koreans were probably long done celebrating successful rocket tests when this video was published

    • @Dev-In-Denver123
      @Dev-In-Denver123 Před 4 lety +2

      @@epikmanthe3rd According to... Who?

    • @epikmanthe3rd
      @epikmanthe3rd Před 4 lety +8

      @@Dev-In-Denver123 US intelligence questions the capability of the missiles to survive reentry at steeper angles. Past tests have also shown severe deficiencies in reliability of their missile programs, specifically long range weapons. Their most reliable weapons uses a fairly flat trajectory which is much easier to intercept.

    • @epikmanthe3rd
      @epikmanthe3rd Před 4 lety +1

      @@Dev-In-Denver123 www.38north.org/2019/07/vvandiepen072519/ a much more in-depth article with sources.

  • @MaMusikify
    @MaMusikify Před 6 lety +106

    You don't need GPS. They designed modern missiles that follow the stars for guidance. Not kidding.

    • @vigneshanand3348
      @vigneshanand3348 Před 4 lety +12

      GPS can be spoofed , usually a gyroscope based INS and other supplementary navigation.

    • @retiredamericanpatriot5571
      @retiredamericanpatriot5571 Před 4 lety +1

      The GPS satellites are owned by the government and thus the civilization access is less accurate and movable.

    • @zathary564
      @zathary564 Před 3 lety

      I have a better idea: remote control. Give it to a guy, and fly it like an rc thing

    • @korvo9936
      @korvo9936 Před 3 lety

      @@zathary564 it can be jammed easily or hacked
      so its not that reliable

    • @imaginelosing7067
      @imaginelosing7067 Před 3 lety +2

      @@korvo9936 just give him an uno reverse card

  • @ilsunnylo3562
    @ilsunnylo3562 Před 6 lety +671

    South korea is just across the river...

    • @Kai-vo5zq
      @Kai-vo5zq Před 6 lety +54

      Ilsunny Lo i don't think you quite understand...

    • @zachgullerman3183
      @zachgullerman3183 Před 6 lety +89

      South Korea is probably the least likely for a nuclear attack. The entire reason North Korea hasn't been crushed by every country it's pissed off is because they have a shitload of artillery pointed at their hostage, South Korea. If anyone were to go near North Korea, Seoul (South Korea's capital) would be blown to bits in a second.

    • @goustune
      @goustune Před 6 lety +9

      What river are you talking about ? There is no river between both korea

    • @Sha.ll0w
      @Sha.ll0w Před 6 lety +18

      +Zach Gullerman but here's the real question: Why the fuck is the Capital of SK located right on the border

    • @jimmymymtv2254
      @jimmymymtv2254 Před 6 lety +6

      i have often wondered about that geographical fact myself. I think i would maybe propose a vote to move the city :P

  • @notajetplane
    @notajetplane Před 6 lety +6

    I can't stop watching your videos. I have learned so much. I work in computers but never really knew how a transistor worked, I just knew that it did. keep up the good work.

  • @uzaiyaro
    @uzaiyaro Před 3 lety +3

    Two fun facts: normal GPS will stop working after a certain speed (Mach 2 I think?) to prevent its use in guided missiles. Similarly, there’s a restriction on the frame rate of thermal cameras to prevent their use in heat-seeking missiles.

  • @Pilot_Pirx
    @Pilot_Pirx Před 6 lety +605

    Roses are red.
    Kim Jong Un is hardly a real threat.
    Why North Korea Cant Build An ICBM (yet)

    • @aubreygraham6728
      @aubreygraham6728 Před 6 lety +8

      Matey! They have one that can hit mainland US

    • @Bruhwhatthehellbruh
      @Bruhwhatthehellbruh Před 6 lety +8

      Aubrey Graham Says who? CNN and Kim's propaganda?

    • @Dover939
      @Dover939 Před 6 lety +4

      +Aubrey Graham
      No they don't.
      And even if they did, it'd be shot down long before it could impact.

    • @TNTMans
      @TNTMans Před 6 lety +1

      r/bootobig

    • @Sha.ll0w
      @Sha.ll0w Před 6 lety +1

      +Richard Driskill why not? If we can launch a Nuke as fast and as far away at that, then why can't we launch a much more lightweight and faster Anti-Missile?
      Its not because its hard to achieve, its because its achievable to take down an ICBM.
      There already are active Anti-ICBM batteries on US or Europe

  • @adamchase1517
    @adamchase1517 Před 6 lety +143

    The Supreme Leader Thanks You For This Video

  • @DanZorny
    @DanZorny Před 6 lety +5

    This is one of those channels that anyone can enjoy and learn at the same time

  • @andrewsnipesu1597
    @andrewsnipesu1597 Před 6 lety +92

    Lets hope Kim Jon In doesn't find out about ksp...

  • @thenotflatearth2714
    @thenotflatearth2714 Před 6 lety +661

    Because Kim jun un eats too much that it consumes 70% of their military budget lol

    • @crackedemerald4930
      @crackedemerald4930 Před 6 lety +25

      The Earth OOOOOHHHHH GET SHR3KT M8

    • @Sha.ll0w
      @Sha.ll0w Před 6 lety +15

      Maybe if Kim put some Sauce or Mayo over the Missile it could withstand reentry to not burn all the Calories and actually get there.

    • @secretred6432
      @secretred6432 Před 6 lety +1

      Split Shockwave Lel

    • @neonflashsparkotron5435
      @neonflashsparkotron5435 Před 6 lety +2

      The Earth Kim is too freaking fat, he is a fat dingus even His mom hates him

    • @kaliyuga1476
      @kaliyuga1476 Před 6 lety

      The Earth ?

  • @firetornaddo9485
    @firetornaddo9485 Před 2 lety +7

    Me: *sees title of the video* : kalm
    Me *sees when it was relased* : PANIKKK

  • @davidmashiku6981
    @davidmashiku6981 Před 4 lety

    Real Engineering thank you so much for taking the time to make these videos. Out of everything I have watched on CZcams... Real Engineering has been the most informative entertaining. Thank you

  • @Mossad901
    @Mossad901 Před 3 lety +5

    Time to update this video

  • @Cythil
    @Cythil Před 6 lety +14

    There is a good reason not to freak out too much if you are an American as the video shows. It is Japan and especially South Korea that is under greatest threat right now. But I hope calmer and more rational minds wins out.

    • @pauljones3017
      @pauljones3017 Před 6 lety +5

      In any case, North Korea wouldn't attack if they aren't attacked. The nukes (launched to its allies) only are a deterrent to the USA overthrowing Kim.

    • @Cythil
      @Cythil Před 6 lety

      Yeah. If they use them they lose all deterrent they have. I would not see it as a rational act. And while Kim may act irrationally it is likely just that, an act. I do think that if the war goes hot again that they might use nuclear weapons. But not until they feel really treated. Not some minor skirmish where there is not real treat to them.

    • @seigeengine
      @seigeengine Před 6 lety +1

      The point is you don't gamble on the other guy being rational when the stakes are a build up of their ability to cause mass harm.

    • @Cythil
      @Cythil Před 6 lety +1

      Yes. But you do not beat irrational behavior by being irrational your self. That is just an old myth. Like the way to beat a chess expect is to make an irritational play. It may throw off a competent play but a master will just adapt and exploit the irrational move.
      You do not have anything to win by assuming that Kim is irrational. You should have a plan for that eventuality. Just like you should have plan for what happens if there is a coup in North Korea. But you can not try to make a preemptive strike that would likely just lead to a full-scale war. As the irrational move for Kim would not be go on full counter attack if that happened. A irrational person would also be likely to do rational move at times.
      The building of missile defenses shields is the actually one of these back up plans for it North Korea would act irrational.

  • @tu-95turbopropstrategicbom55

    Great video! Just one correction. While the A-4 did use a measured fuel system, it was not the means of controlling range, it was found incapable of actually doing so, more importantly it also incorporated automatic fuel cutoff systems to prevent overburning and simply used fuel supplied as an estimate to cover requisite distance. The first systems used a wireless transmission system to send current velocity ground measured velocity to the rocket which would be checked and cutoff if it passed the measured threshold. Later on the I-Gerät 1/3 integrating accelerometers and I-Gerät 2 electrolytic integrative accelerometer were used to accomplish this Brenschluss.

  • @secretred6432
    @secretred6432 Před 6 lety +48

    Kim you are not you when your hungry eat a snickers

    • @arthas640
      @arthas640 Před 5 lety +3

      Kim: *eats 237 snickers*
      Kim: "I'm still hangry, lets threaten to bomb Thailand if they dont send some Pad Thai"

    • @vacuousbard6410
      @vacuousbard6410 Před 4 lety

      @@arthas640 They won't attack fellow military-controlled country without attack their mortal enemy first.

    • @imk5600
      @imk5600 Před 3 lety

      me:.................................. s*** i don't even like snickers!

  • @pieterfischer9638
    @pieterfischer9638 Před 6 lety +2

    I have a theory as to how they could have potentially made a manned ICBM work in WW2.... if instead of ejecting from the ICBM upwards, could they not devise a mechanism to open up underneath the ICBM and slant his seat - essentially flipping it back to front prior to ejecting. Meaning he will be facing the rear of the missile upon hitting the force of the air outside of the aircraft, being shielded by his seat. Protecting his neck from whiplash while deploying the chute 10 sec after - to allow for safe deceleration as to not tear his parachute. He can be supplied with a 5L air canister strapped to his chest so as to not suffocate from the drop in air pressure at the point of ejection process starting underneath him. ( I know this wont work, but i thought i would give an attempt at it)....

  • @tricitiesair
    @tricitiesair Před 6 lety +129

    While some people are freaking out over missiles North Korea has thousands of artillery aimed at the millions of civilians living in Seoul.

    • @POPJack1717
      @POPJack1717 Před 6 lety +24

      Jon Umine they have russian s300 and possibly s400 SAMs. Those would be a big issue for american airpower

    • @Bird_Dog00
      @Bird_Dog00 Před 6 lety +6

      That is indeed a much bigger and more tangible threat.

    • @adityapatil325
      @adityapatil325 Před 6 lety +4

      Jon Umine I don't think this is that easy. Artilleries can be hidden, and it takes lot of firepower and airpower to destroy so many artilleries. I'd say 30-60 min of heavy pounding. By then, SK and US would have destroyed most artillery. But NK would be able to keep pounding for many more hours.

    • @themadhammer3305
      @themadhammer3305 Před 6 lety +4

      Aditya Patil add to that every artillery gun is probably pre - targeted for either Seoul or military bases on the DMZ, also even if those guns were only in operation for an hour (for the sake of arguement), they still have 8,600 assorted artillery guns most with a rate of fire of 5-6 rounds per minute. So doing the math thats roughly 2.5 million artillery shells that could be fired in that first hour, this is provided ammunition stores hold out, no mechanical breakdowns, crews dont take any breaks in that time and that all of their artillery pieces are active and located on the border
      That is a scary volume of firepower that could be unleashed

    • @comradedoge5009
      @comradedoge5009 Před 6 lety +15

      Jon Umine North Koreans have had 50 years to hide and protect their arty, a single bombing run wont destroy thousands of hidden, protected artillery. It could take days before the last artillery bunkers are destroyed.

  • @MrJason005
    @MrJason005 Před 6 lety +13

    0:12 here's your ad skip

  • @MadfugginMax
    @MadfugginMax Před 6 lety

    Thanks for the history, well done, subbed.

  • @flyallen8165
    @flyallen8165 Před 6 lety

    Wow this channel has exploded since the first vid and when I subbed, for good reason too, so clear and nice animations as well!

  • @napoleon9514
    @napoleon9514 Před 2 lety +5

    4 yrs later and North Korea has build the ICBM.

  • @luciahu5519
    @luciahu5519 Před 6 lety +92

    This video is now expired.

    • @glennyj65
      @glennyj65 Před 4 lety

      and they misspelled the word "separation"....lol

    • @robertdawg4754
      @robertdawg4754 Před 4 lety +2

      NK’s nukes still are ass and fall short 💀

    • @sylamy7457
      @sylamy7457 Před 3 lety

      @@robertdawg4754 They can reach the same distance as America, but they're so out of date , and most likely would either fall short into the ocean or hit canada.😂 and we have a shield to shoot them down so easily.

  • @stephenverchinski9967
    @stephenverchinski9967 Před 6 lety

    Well stated about the complexity involved. Thank you.

  • @phillysub5115
    @phillysub5115 Před 6 lety

    Great video......looking forward to the next one.

  • @ascii4618
    @ascii4618 Před 6 lety +4

    North korea:
    "Hold my beer"

  • @guest_informant
    @guest_informant Před 6 lety +6

    3:20 *Separate* - I always think of _separate_ and _apart_ to remind me it's an _a_

    • @zaxarrrr3659
      @zaxarrrr3659 Před 3 lety

      Thank you random internet use from the past, always get that one wrong.

  • @impguardwarhamer
    @impguardwarhamer Před 5 lety +1

    Worth noting ICBM's don't use blunt body re-entry, and instead have extremely streamlined rentry vehicles.
    This allows them to reach the ground extraordinarily quickly which is part of why they're so difficult to counter

  • @KalleBowo
    @KalleBowo Před 6 lety +1

    First of all, great channel! Secondly: You should totally do a video about hovercraft technology - just a spontaneous thought :D

  • @pedrofdmp
    @pedrofdmp Před 6 lety +4

    Great production, this is just miles ahead of mainstream media. It's because of this type of high quality content i don't even own a television anymore :D

    • @OGPatriot03
      @OGPatriot03 Před 6 lety +3

      You should have other sources too. There were a number of mistakes made in this video such as the purpose for the shape of your typical re-entry capsule. The reason behind the assumptions that NK can't create a re-entry capsule for a small nuclear device is because one of their tests didn't make the cut, however using that same reasoning you'd believe SpaceX wouldn't have ever made it either, and a tr-entry capsule is significantly easier to create than what SpaceX has done.
      The only question is if they have small nuclear devices or not. - The re-entry Capsule would be easy as all get out for them to create. Do they? Well they say that they do and we don't have proof that they don't.

    • @pedrofdmp
      @pedrofdmp Před 6 lety

      Patriot 03 good point, can you point to some other sources?

    • @ReynardFuchsmann
      @ReynardFuchsmann Před 6 lety

      pedrofdmp are you talking about? This video was absolute trash, completely misinformed, mostly personal opinion, and worst of all politically biased.

    • @pedrofdmp
      @pedrofdmp Před 6 lety

      Xortsa interesting, why do you say so?

  • @shariq_riyaz
    @shariq_riyaz Před 10 měsíci +4

    Here from future. Bro they took your video as a challenge.
    Now they have ICBMs😅

  • @CreativeIkiguy
    @CreativeIkiguy Před 6 lety

    Awesome video dude!

  • @0MoTheG
    @0MoTheG Před 6 lety

    REVs do not use the blunt body method but solely rely on ablative cooling/shielding. They also use a sharper even worse angle of entry.

  • @andrewcarnegie5342
    @andrewcarnegie5342 Před 4 lety +9

    Because he do not have membership of skillshare.

  • @justinw1851
    @justinw1851 Před 6 lety +71

    but the Hwasong-14?

    • @dellsantiago8108
      @dellsantiago8108 Před 6 lety +3

      Wilhelm VonRoefelz how do you know sir?

    • @patrikorsuliak8137
      @patrikorsuliak8137 Před 6 lety +10

      Wilhelm VonRoefelz ICBM use satellite and inertial guidance you idiot, you know nothing about missile technology

    • @petroelb
      @petroelb Před 6 lety +7

      Wilhelm VonRoefelz - Doesn't pretty much everything in the US arsenal predate satellite navigation?

    • @bowmanduncan2497
      @bowmanduncan2497 Před 6 lety +5

      Ben i think its optional as they may not need satillite guidance if they already have coordinates.

    • @patrikorsuliak8137
      @patrikorsuliak8137 Před 6 lety +5

      Wilhelm VonRoefelz they need satellite guidance otherwise their ICBM will be inaccurate you idiot

  • @mareksumguy1887
    @mareksumguy1887 Před 6 lety

    Great video. I love these vids... i love this guy!

  • @globgogabgalab._.5178
    @globgogabgalab._.5178 Před 6 lety +2

    0:45 YES I GOT MY V2 ROCKET KILLSTREAK

  • @AniMageNeBy
    @AniMageNeBy Před rokem +3

    Whelp, that didn't age well.
    Luckily you put "yet" after that sentence, seen how it is 5 years later.

  • @eduardo98m
    @eduardo98m Před 5 lety +4

    ""NORTH KOREA WANTS TO KNOW YOUR LOCATION""

  • @ninjaspoketlaban4417
    @ninjaspoketlaban4417 Před 6 lety +2

    They have one now

  • @zakiducky
    @zakiducky Před 5 lety

    Chris Burkard is an awesome photographer. Love his work.

  • @antoniorsoftware
    @antoniorsoftware Před 3 lety +5

    North Korea military parade 2020.

  • @rkpetry
    @rkpetry Před 6 lety +3

    1. [title] "cant" [sic; nt→n't]; 2. [03:17] "seperation" [sic; e→a]; 3. According to Janes 1996 NK's neighbor had the DF-41 ICBM....

  • @gingaleanda
    @gingaleanda Před 6 lety

    Good channel dude!

  • @harrisonrutledge5
    @harrisonrutledge5 Před 6 lety

    Splendid! Thank you.

  • @DiabloDBS
    @DiabloDBS Před 6 lety +6

    What about a HEMP? Sure you still need guidance but no heat shielding.

    • @jerryslater3447
      @jerryslater3447 Před 6 lety

      for re-entry NOT
      for getting Higher.... OK... Hemp... Rope.... Climb it..... Up.....
      Guidance ? like steering.......ROFLMAO....... HEM..(burp)P iss off

    • @DiabloDBS
      @DiabloDBS Před 6 lety

      +jerry slater
      *Not sure if trolling, bad at formulating words or just stupid*
      So did you actually fail to google HEMP a.k.a. High Altitude ElectroMagnetic Pulse when you had no idea what i wrote or is this some really stupid looking trolling attempt?

  • @The101Pianist
    @The101Pianist Před 6 lety +4

    3:24 Separation not Seperation

  • @manjunathyatnur8562
    @manjunathyatnur8562 Před 6 lety

    Awesome Video...Great Job.

  • @jasonlumoksoify
    @jasonlumoksoify Před 6 lety +1

    Interesting points, but it would be ignorant to underestimate anyone. It's impressive what they've been able to create.

  • @maxinfly
    @maxinfly Před 6 lety +268

    I bet there were similar "Why USSR can't build nuclear bomb" research in late 1940s.

    • @TheObsidianX
      @TheObsidianX Před 6 lety +41

      Максим Синёв that's why the title says (yet)

    • @totel9193
      @totel9193 Před 6 lety +63

      Максим Синёв except USSR was much bigger than North Korea, and it had relatively good relations with other countries at the time and wasn't as much behind other countries in terms of military technology as NK, yet still they only managed to develop the bomb by stealing plans from the US and developed ICBMs only because they had german engineers who created V2 (and first USRR missiles were basically V2 ripoffs).
      I wouldn't be concerned too much about NK attacking US with ICBMs; the bigger problem is the possibility of NK attacking neighboring countries with nukes (especially South Korea).
      Also I wouldn't be surprised if after the resulting counterattack Kim Jong decided to nuke his own country just to take out the enemy. Just imagine the civillian losses.
      The problem with nukes is not their offensive potential. The real problem is, once a country gets nukes (especiall a crazy country like NK), it becomes impossible to defeat without insane losses on both sides, unless you have ICBMs and nuke it before it gets its ICBMs and nukes you, but then NK could still threaten to nuke neighboring countries once they detect incoming ICBMs.

    • @OGPatriot03
      @OGPatriot03 Před 6 lety +19

      ^ You could say the same exact thing about America.

    • @DeadBaron
      @DeadBaron Před 6 lety +31

      Максим Синёв LMAO there's no comparison. 40s and 50s USSR had a far better economy and WAY more resources than North Korea.

    • @krivakapa
      @krivakapa Před 6 lety +8

      Truman believed USSR is decades from bomb.

  • @JohnSmith-gp2xq
    @JohnSmith-gp2xq Před 6 lety +4

    What? They already have a ICBM.

  • @MasterYota1
    @MasterYota1 Před 4 lety +2

    Chinese military expert as saying China cannot stop North Korea from using Beidou in military operations.
    Beside Beidou, the other main satellite navigation options for North Korea are the Global Positioning System of the United States and the Russian system known as Glonass.

  • @jugadug
    @jugadug Před 6 lety

    rocket science is really hard thanks for the video

  • @remigiuszdarmach4233
    @remigiuszdarmach4233 Před 4 lety +7

    Kim could build ICBM if he use skillshare!

  • @lilysthapit2222
    @lilysthapit2222 Před 4 lety +3

    Video: Why North Korea can't build an ICM (yet)
    Me: lol so we're safe.
    Also Video: 2 years ago.

  • @jamesvanantwerp1516
    @jamesvanantwerp1516 Před 6 lety

    Great video!

  • @timoburggraaf6945
    @timoburggraaf6945 Před 6 lety

    Could you make a video on railguns?
    I saw a video of one being tested and i was wondering about how exactly they worked and what the advantage could be relative to a traditonal gun.

  • @laurynascekanavicius9230
    @laurynascekanavicius9230 Před 6 lety +626

    Can't*

  • @alvaromorata2770
    @alvaromorata2770 Před 6 lety +55

    guess who just launched one

    • @dsandoval9396
      @dsandoval9396 Před 5 lety +7

      Me, it came out of my ass and was actually biological AND nuclear in nature.

  • @drbelli
    @drbelli Před 6 lety +1

    very objective and well made vid!
    i got some neat ideas for your channel, like:
    using games that allow you to engineer well known devices, such as tanks, planes, or in this case missiles and guided rockets, in this particular instance using kerbal space program.
    so you would have this vid, and a link to how to build a V2, or a Saturn V by yourself, virtually.
    that could make you twice-ly awesome =]

  • @Gunbudder
    @Gunbudder Před 6 lety

    THANK YOU FOR MAKING THIS. I get tired of explaining the engineering of ICBMs to people, and now i can just tell people to watch this video when they are freaking out.

    • @Gunbudder
      @Gunbudder Před 6 lety

      You got me, i was paid by Soros to make this comment. IM SORRY SOROS I DON'T KNOW HOW THEY FOUND OUT!!!

  • @lilysthapit2222
    @lilysthapit2222 Před 4 lety +6

    *sees video title*
    Phew, they can't reach us yet!
    **Uploaded 2 years ago**
    Me: (0_0)

  • @mwilson1645
    @mwilson1645 Před 6 lety +13

    Looks like they may have done it. 2800 miles into space and a successful reentry means that they can reach the US.
    We can't wait for your update video. Thanks for your good work!

    • @ahlong2339
      @ahlong2339 Před 5 lety

      Wait, that mean the first country to send human in space is NAZI germany

  • @rmg6884
    @rmg6884 Před 6 lety

    Heat shields use a special substance to keep it cool enough to not explode. This could be used on an intercontinental missile.
    The substance is called “albator” or something.

  • @edwardjones8170
    @edwardjones8170 Před 5 lety

    You forgot that also in mid course ICBMs use celestial guidance , just like sailors used to use a sextant to calculate their positions.

  • @nukedukem6
    @nukedukem6 Před 3 lety +3

    this aged well

  • @philswede
    @philswede Před 6 lety +13

    Will we see a - How did North Korea manage to build a ICBM - Now?

    • @AbbasAleid
      @AbbasAleid Před 6 lety +1

      Pli Mak I would love to see that.

  • @Greatnfunvideos
    @Greatnfunvideos Před 6 lety

    Super interesting video!👍

  • @miharvi1
    @miharvi1 Před rokem +1

    Omg that was 5 years ago now they def have

  • @tostitossssss
    @tostitossssss Před 6 lety +3

    There is still hope.

  • @JoaKimzen
    @JoaKimzen Před 5 lety +6

    1 month later:
    *north korea launches ICBM*

  • @Patchuchan
    @Patchuchan Před 6 lety

    Most ICBMs don't use satellite navigation and instead use inertial and celestial navigation as those signals can be easily jammed or spoofed.

  • @BritishBeachcomber
    @BritishBeachcomber Před 6 lety

    6:30 since GPS Selective Availability (SA) was removed in 2007, accuracy is usually within 4 metres, at 95% Confidence Interval. Good enough to hit anything with a nuke...

  • @TinkeringNerd
    @TinkeringNerd Před 6 lety +102

    Yeah, they just did it!

    • @johnkim8259
      @johnkim8259 Před 6 lety +13

      Just saw articles about how they failed reentry tests, you need to do more research before claiming fake news.

    • @lindsaytang1017
      @lindsaytang1017 Před 6 lety

      It's not good enough. It may hit the U.S, but it would probably hit just off the coast off the U.S.

    • @supertornadogun1690
      @supertornadogun1690 Před 6 lety +1

      they bought it from china

    • @Leodn
      @Leodn Před 6 lety +1

      The hydrogen bombs warheads they now own need no precision whatsoever, as one such detonation can wipe out the area of an entire state.

    • @jeralddunn3782
      @jeralddunn3782 Před 6 lety +1

      But I think the point to be made here is that the Warhead would burn up, therefore preventing the h-bomb from hitting the surface and exploding. Duh

  • @feynstein1004
    @feynstein1004 Před 6 lety +6

    So they have the necessary oil and gold but not enough knowledge. Rise of Nations was surprisingly accurate.

  • @ItsNukeBoii
    @ItsNukeBoii Před 6 lety +1

    "They can't set off any Bombs" *sets of h-bomb*

  • @bdub6288
    @bdub6288 Před 6 lety

    The re-entry nose cone lasted until 1km in height which is the optimal height for an emp. They have an ICBM, accuracy doesn't matter with 160kt thermonuclear warhead.

  • @charleshu5752
    @charleshu5752 Před 6 lety +334

    Never clicked on any video this fast

    • @MihkelKukk
      @MihkelKukk Před 6 lety +117

      There's always that guy...

    • @LonginusFX
      @LonginusFX Před 6 lety +3

      Easy tumb ups Easy dopamine.

    • @blumac9801
      @blumac9801 Před 6 lety +7

      Charles Hu North Korea has never clicked the missile launch button so fast either

    • @brandonwiebe2647
      @brandonwiebe2647 Před 6 lety

      LonginusFX it gets him off

    • @jerryslater3447
      @jerryslater3447 Před 6 lety

      Blumac :
      Twitchy Fingers vs Tiny Fingers ?

  • @phatkid6811
    @phatkid6811 Před 6 lety +7

    A real fact is that the world has underestimated the DPRK. Videos like this contribute to kicking the can down the road: "...well they have X, but they can't do Y so we should all not worry." What we should be saying is that "they have X, and they'll have Y soon and it'll be horrible - what are we going to do now so that they don't get Y."

    • @flashjack7320
      @flashjack7320 Před 4 lety

      How about the US has X, has used it twice and thinks it can use tactical Y's with first strike and rule the world. It is horrible already, what are we doing to rid the US of X's and Y's. US International policy - Saddam is bad - hurts thousands of his own people - lets invade and kill a million - US good - now apply to NK.

  • @zuzusuperfly8363
    @zuzusuperfly8363 Před 6 lety +2

    Another channel I didn't know I needed. These kinds of specialised documentary style channels are definitely the future of CZcams.

  • @douglasbillington8521
    @douglasbillington8521 Před 3 lety

    I do enjoy these videos. Even ones about terrible human inventions. Also just got to love the Irish brogue narration.

  • @greenpepper21
    @greenpepper21 Před 6 lety +3

    The video does not prove its title to be true.
    1. NK's 2 ICBMs this year did survive re-entry back to the atmosphere.
    2. NK not only can miniaturize nukes but also h-bombs now.
    3. The latest test proved they'd reach our East Coast if shot at a lower angle.
    All that this video proves is that it "was" a difficult task for previous challengers like Nazi Germany.

  • @MikeAW2010
    @MikeAW2010 Před 6 lety +4

    fast forward to today... ...that was a very short "yet"

  • @TalonMath
    @TalonMath Před 6 lety

    One thing:A typical ICBM does not use satellites for guiding, instead, it use celestial navigation system (an optical system which tracks star light, just as the ancient sextant).although it is heavy and expensive, but the reliability is perfect.

  • @elliejohnson2786
    @elliejohnson2786 Před 6 lety

    3:30
    For interest's sake, is that a damping harmonic function or does it just look like one?

  • @zippymax1
    @zippymax1 Před 6 lety +16

    The North Koreans could use the U.S. public GPS network. It's available to anyone. It's just like military-grade (it's from the same satellites), except it's only accurate to ten or twenty meters, not ten or twenty centimeters. But that's good enough for Kim's needs.

    • @RealEngineering
      @RealEngineering  Před 6 lety +23

      Public GPS shuts off the moment the receiver begins acting like a missile

    • @rayszen4053
      @rayszen4053 Před 6 lety

      zippymax1 riposte dont worry they dont have internet :D MEMES RUSH

    • @imdbere
      @imdbere Před 6 lety +8

      This limit is only programmed into the receivers, it shouldnt be impossible to bypass it.

    • @zippymax1
      @zippymax1 Před 6 lety +15

      Real Engineering: wrong. Your _device_ itself is programmed to shut down if the GPS signals it receives from the satellites indicate it is travelling at over 1200 mph. The satellites don't shut off their signals. Use your head. That would drop all GPS for everyone in that entire hemisphere of the world. We don't all get some special individual beam from the satellite. We all use the same beam, and it takes at least four satellites for your cell phone to triangulate its own position. Drones require six.
      The signal is one-way. Do you really think your phone is constantly broadcasting info back to a satellite? Nope. Yet that's the only way the satellite would know to shut off. Your phone can't effectively broadcast much past the nearest cell tower. It's just receiving signals from four powerfully-broadcasting geostationary satellites in the sky and number-crunching that info internally into its own positional coordinates.
      NK would just have to build its own little guidance system and leave out the Shutdown-At-1200MPH line in its programming.

    • @louaial-obaidi3998
      @louaial-obaidi3998 Před 6 lety +4

      That just means they can't use a commercially available receiver. Technically, nothing is stopping them from engineering they're own receivers without the restriction. One hacker already did, and was even kind enough to post the instructions and source code online for everyone to see: www.aholme.co.uk/GPS/Main.htm
      Of course the obvious downside to relying directly on your enemies infrastructure, is that the US army could just shut down civilian GPS at any time if they felt there was a threat (as you yourself already mentioned in your GPS video) and then NK would be back at square one.

  • @reaality3860
    @reaality3860 Před 6 lety +4

    When you come across a rattlesnake, why should you wait until it bites to take action?

    • @RicardoFuertes1990
      @RicardoFuertes1990 Před 6 lety

      good thing country rattle snake

    • @101jir
      @101jir Před 6 lety +1

      Too bad that analogy still worked well enough for Nazi Germany when it was originally used.

    • @reaality3860
      @reaality3860 Před 6 lety +2

      I believe it was Winston Churchill who said it. He certainly was more correct than Chamberlin. Kind of like the difference between Trump and Obama.

    • @speedy01247
      @speedy01247 Před 6 lety

      I had thought it was Roosevelt, but I guess I could be wrong.

    • @101jir
      @101jir Před 6 lety

      It was Roosevelt as a frustrated response to American isolationism.

  • @RoyalDoyle845
    @RoyalDoyle845 Před 6 lety +1

    One thing that has me skeptical is that we had icbms well before gps. Also, I don't even think they would need to be very accurate with a nuclear payload.

  • @sudiballer
    @sudiballer Před 3 lety

    You are a bloody genius