Banning TikTok?
Vložit
- čas přidán 15. 03. 2024
- Head to brilliant.org/patrick/ to start your free 30-day trial and get 20% off Brilliant's annual premium subscription.
The US House of Representatives passed a bill this week that could see TikTok being banned in the United States. On the same day, British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak laid out plans to change the law to prevent foreign states from buying British news organizations in order to block an Abu Dhabi led deal to buy The Spectator and Telegraph newspapers. On Thursday Joe Biden announced his opposition to Nippon Steel’s proposed purchase of US Steel, saying it was “vital” for the American steel company to remain “domestically owned and operated.” To what extent should we worry about foreign ownership?
Patrick's Books:
Statistics For The Trading Floor: amzn.to/3eerLA0
Derivatives For The Trading Floor: amzn.to/3cjsyPF
Corporate Finance: amzn.to/3fn3rvC
Ways To Support The Channel
Patreon: / patrickboyleonfinance
Buy Me a Coffee: www.buymeacoffee.com/patrickb...
Visit our website: www.onfinance.org
Follow Patrick on Twitter Here: / patrickeboyle
Patrick Boyle On Finance Podcast:
Spotify: open.spotify.com/show/7uhrWlD...
Apple: podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast...
Google Podcasts: tinyurl.com/62862nve
Join this channel to support making this content:
/ @pboyle
Head to brilliant.org/patrick/ to start your free 30-day trial and get 20% off Brilliant's annual premium subscription.
I can't believe this woman in the thumb isn't AI
I agree. Are you referring to the sound that started around 7:00 which appears to sound like running water? @@DrogoBaggins987
I like the caveat "I'm told it's..." before saying Brilliant is "6x" more effective at whatever
Hope you can prevent a recurrence of the strange background noise (6:37 to10:39 approx and 17:10 to 18:34) in future videos.
It's really quite brilliant 😉@@iPhotochop
When Google (temporarily) owned Motorola, to help get the purchase deal through they announced "no plans to layoff anyone, that's not what this deal is about" and then they laid off 20% of the Motorola employees inside of a year. When a company says "no layoffs are planned" what they are really saying is "you would be an imbecile to trust anything that isn't written in a binding contract."
Its not possible to know exactly who to lay off before you bought the company. Lol the entire accounts department is a duplicate set of employees so of course those roles are nearly all going to it would be absurd to keep them all siting there doing no work. 20% sounds roughly like the back office staff not engineers so they were all 100% going to lose their jobs.
Hint: If your company gets bought out and you are doing worker drone level back office work take voluntary redundance and get out before everyone else.
@@backgammonbacon In conclusion, you are saying that when a new company say that "there will be no layoffs", they are lying, and that an employee should make plans accordingly.
Glad that you agree with the thread opener.
Google never wanted the employees, just the patents. Google ruthlessly gutted one of the american great tech firms to boost its mobile business. Sometimes domestic takeovers are more hostile than foreign ones.
I worked at a company where our CEO gathered a meeting and told us that even though they're are rumors, the company is not being sold. Next week they sold the company.
Never trust what want Chief Executive says.
@@Jossandoval thats actually not what they said though. There is a difference between "There are no plans" and "There will be no". When Google bought the company, they may well have had no plans to terminate employess, then they actually bought it and realised they actually "needed" to.
"I'd have to become a LinkedIn influencer...the worst kind of influencer". I lost it.
Patrick's jokes only get better.
The joke is that Microsoft apparently added AI/Copilot to LinkedIn but no one noticed since the output was indistinguishable from the vapid self-aggrandization that takes place there already.
They linked out. Their loss, not mine, talk about a cult.
I heard him say it as I read this comment LOL
LinkedIn influencers are the cringiest "pick-me" I've ever seen
@@ballinspalding11 That's because they decided to focus on jobseekers, rather than the knowledgeable.
Feels so good in situations like these to live in Eastern Europe. You never feel off about investing in your home country. Because you never want to invest in your home country.
Suffering from aucces
i´m from southern europe, our stock market is already owned by our top dogs and we only have 20 companies is not worth the risk imo
haha I understand you, I'm from Mexico and our stock market is also boring as fu** but at least here I have the option to invest in the USA, the securities I have from own homeland are government bonds, they offer 11% rate of interest even after taxes, not a great sign about our country our central bank needs to offer that rate to finance public activities but meh I take advantage of it
@@joseafalvel Guatemala? EDIT: nevermind, I read the Mexico part but thought you invested in Guatemalan government bonds
Not all Eastern Europe is equal. F.e. Bulgaria and Poland are not comparable
The sound from the gears turning in Patrick's head is quite noticable in this video
The first half sounded like a streetmob getting closer and closer, I thought it was an ironical touch dissing tictoc.
Patrick becoming a TikTok financial rapper would be the one thing that could convince me to install the app 😂
I think you can teach AI to rap, and Patrick already looks like a CGI verisimilitude of his IRL personage, so this is GOING TO HAPPEN!.
All he has to do is hand ChatGPT-Infinity a theme and a few hook lines, and stand back.
So looking forward to his RAZZLEKHAN Dis tracks!
Gotta take part of that back... this new camera angle really makes Patrick look NOT like CGI.
“Famously productive French employees” 😂
7th largest economy in the World (out of 192). Not bad for the Frenchies who work 35h/week with 9 weeks of paid leave per year.
I'm somewhat jealous.
And 3 of the Countries ahead are illegitimate dictatorships where governments don't understand the concept of fair trade and fair elections : India, China and USA ...
@@melmaciandissenter2324 lmao cope. "Illegitimate dictatorship" for 2 biggest democracies itw : usa and India
I want to see Philomena Cunk interview Patrick sometime.
“What do you do with immature bonds? Do you have to break up with them?” -- Philomena probably
She's currently busy as a policy consultant to the Tories.
Excellent idea. I would want Patrick to deadpan right back at her, though, with equally obtuse answers. I think he could beat her at her own game.
Cunk would break him. He 100% would break out in a rap.
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Requiring citizens to invest only within the country makes as much financial sense as putting all your 401(K) in company stock. One crash and you'd be out of a job, lost all savings, and have no retirement fund
Yes but no one is suggesting that it's more the opposite of it its preventing total flight from important sectors of investing. its like saying I will sell my house to a guy who has a reputation for damaging the local housing markets. That just bad for business and trusting a person with somthing vital to local economic interests who hasn't earned the respect or even worse is trying to weaponize investing is totally foolish.
@@ellebleisch6853 Investing isn’t doing social justice, it’s seeking maximum return. Won’t sell to highest bidder is just HODL
Let me know where I can invest in another planet when this one crashes
I fully expected the "That fell into my newsfeed this week" to segue into a Ground News Sponsership read.
Damnit, CZcams has trained me too well.
Sh1t I always thought it's spelt segway
Not (well) Enough.
clearly you didn't look for the pinned ad comment to know what to be on the look out for
Me too, 100%
I appreciate you using the lettuce as a stand in for Liz Truss
An interesting case for canadian pensions was when Alberta forced the takeover of the Alberta teachers pension fund into the broader Alberta public employee fund. The teachers fund was far more diversified and had 15-20% growth, the broader Alberta fund had been closer to 5% growth and was over 50% in energy. Considering so much of Alberta real-estate is also dependant on energy jobs its crazy they would diversify that little
That's horrible. Did they give an excuse for the forced change?
They said it was to save redundant administrative costs
@@jeanpaulgrech6540 Alberta continues to try these things, their citizens keep rejecting. Its our most conservative province by far.
Albertan here - I am, no kidding, convinced that our provincial government actively hates Albertans, and is working to destroy us. This was one of many steps to do that.
@silvertone1 I feel like we've got a few different types of conservative provinces (govs anyway). We've got alberta, social and political conservative. Ontario, corporate welfare conservative. And Quebec, immigration / cultural conservative. Then we still have Saskatchewan....and NB...really most of the provinces are some shade of conservative....but bottom line is our pension funds are way too big to be sunk mostly into canadian assets, whether energy, REITs, or banking.
21:15 When you get out of the pool and your ear gets unblocked
Hey! As a french, i work 35 hours a week, and only have 7.5 weeks of PTO a year. I used to have 11, but the salary was way lower.
That is an incredible amount of PTO. Don't come to the US if you think 7.5 weeks is a small amount.
If you consider 7.5 weeks low, Don't come to the United States of America. 3 weeks is generous in the states.
Most I had in UK was 7 weeks which public holidays come out of.
Currently at 5 weeks 😢
The thing with China, is that they technically don't ban western social media apps, the apps just decide that they don't want to comply with Chinese laws and so they don't operate in China. This is similar to how some websites don't work on the EU because they don't want to comply with GDPR.
The US on the other hand just wants to ban apps based on the country where they are from, even if otherwise they're compliant with US laws.
If the US wanted to protect its citizens they would pass a data protection and privacy act for all companies and then ban them according to that, but that would also affect companies such as Facebook and Google, which is why they won't.
Rules for thee but not for me.
NSA spies via Facebook, Google, Microsoft already..
That's a pretty good point. Not a fan of the CCP, but that does make a lot of sense
The Chinese do explicitly ban Western apps. Facebook, Snapchat and CZcams (but not Google) are all banned. Where did you hear otherwise?
TikTok isnt compliant with US laws though.
@@silentdrew7636 if that were true then a bill targeting them specifically wouldn't be needed and it would be in the hands of the courts
Some very weird sound from 6:40 - 10:39
Where were all these protectors of national security when a shady foreign investor from Australia bought up media in the US & UK?
In the US this shady operator started off by bribing the Speaker of the House to circumvent established restrictions on concentration of ownership.
Good to see Patrick broadcasting from his jacks.
It's a tad late for Sunak on UK newspapers given the Evening Standard is majority owned by the Lebedev family with an ex KGB senior agent writing some editorials. And giving Lebedev junior a seat in the Lords.
"With as little as nine weeks a year of paid holiday." LOL!
He forgot the two-hour lunch break.
This is too obvious to influence anyone who actually listens or watches this video.
@@Andrew-rc3vhImpossible to digest correctly bread and wine with your friends without these 1h30 lunch breaks my friend !
@@BTMOvie78 A good friend of mine lives there. It's all true.
@@Andrew-rc3vhyeh, your friend is lying to you...
oddly large amount of background noise in this video
Dishes being washed, reindeer going through, Patrick’s life is a journey for sure.
His newest rap track is playing in the other room
It is very annoying and kept me from watching the video. 😢
😂😂😂
yeah his rap band should be more considerate of his side hustle.
The funny thing is that, at least at a white-collar level, French workers are amazingly productive. They do this by actually doing their work and not sitting around the office at all hours sending emails to each other and trying to look busy.
Honestly, the French and Germans (Euros in general, really) have the right idea: holidays are sacred, lunch breaks are sacred and if you still need to work outside your paid hours to get the job done then either you're an idiot or something has gone terribly wrong.
While productivity in France is fairly high, it's still behind that of e.g. Germany, the Netherlands, and the US.
@@seneca983Good?
@@nono99136 Hmm, I don't quite understand what you're asking.
He is talking to/making fun of the companies perception of French workers
I agree with quality over quantity, and Patrick Boyle may as well too for all we know. He is more so making a multi-layer joke I think
Some sound quality issues in the second half. A very distracting whirring sound
Their is nothing intrinsically wrong with regulating the market and keeping certain strategic businesses and knowledge within your own borders. The problem I have with most of those cases is that they tend to be inconsistent and very opportunistic. In most cases it seems to be about politically profiling and/or about financial interests rather than true strategic considerations. A more correct approach would be to create a consistent policy. Define what is strategic and make regulations that ensure that strategic requirements are met. That may be as simple as raising import tariffs if domestic production doesn't meet strategic requirements.
Thought tariffs never worked? That’s at least what globalists like Patrick were telling me mom-stop 7 years ago
You're thinking too clearly and logically, that has no place in government.
There’s the question of whether it serves the collective good.
But you’re also losing international competitiveness and adaptability.
If your local industries are less effective, stuff costs more, and that will hurt the competitiveness of your economy as a whole.
Some things may deserve to be considered national security / resilience issues.
But in general, you don’t want corruption and inferior stuff inflicted upon your people.
Of course, if you had something like a cheap labor force, the harm from inefficiency might not be as high. But…
@@Leto2ndAtreides Like dependency on 3rd countries is efficient... Sure, if everything goes dandy there are no issues, but the moment disruptions occur damages may be disproportional and eat up marginal efficiency benefits of many years. The moment other countries are capable of blackmailing you because of dependencies, let alone cut you off when it is really crucial all gains of your efficiency and more are wiped out in no time.
Obviously, full independence is in the modern world virtually impossible, but that is no reason to wave it away for short term benefits. For long term prosperity and survival you need control, dependence on a country that can overnight cripple you, or worse, by cutting supply lines is the opposite.
Above that, that things are more expensive.... who cares? That may be relevant for poor countries, rich western countries have plenty, there is no need for economic growth. Above that, long term countries can only consume what they produce unless they leach off other countries. Large economies like US, EU, China are big enough to house all knowledge and skills required for an independent economy.
there
The ‘makes no sense’ at the end caught me by surprise…
Great video once again Patrick.
The crazy part is folks thinking American companies would NOT lay people off.
Top class Patrick, thanks for this eposiode.
Happy Patrick's day Mr. Boyle!
Canadian business leaders
I was offended by that picture. There wasn't a hockey player or curler among them.
Patrick has a black belt in sarcasm.
Very non-inclusive for the mooses too.
@@GaryARahn And beavers.
@@djsmithe mmmm beavers
At this point he should put a photo of a bunch of Indians with turbans, that's all Canada is now
@@mercx007 Or maybe he should put a bunch of unhealthy poor whiney white boys as that is what Canada has somehow become this latest generation or two.
Thank you for the excellent coverage as usual
lol “32 hours a week with as little as 9 weeks of paid holiday “ good stuff
Only school teachers have those benefits, this is not the average at all
@@philippegirard9876 there's not a single teacher that works only 32 hours a week. They might only get paid for that many, but things like grading and lessons plan development have to happen, but aren't paid for.
SPIT MY DRINK!
@@philippegirard9876their pay doesn't increase. It happens is that the same salary gets divided by 52 weeks so they make less through the year to compensate for the summer. Also, teachers work more than 40 hours a week. They work at home too.
@@philippegirard9876 So you're saying it's possible.
Great video, watched till the end!
No layoffs for 2 years is a meaningless statement as that's the amount of time it will take to work out what layoffs to make. People will be layed off even if its just the accounts department, no need for duplicate roles like these.
Patrick I would personally love to witness your “LinkedIn influencer” era 😂😂
If all countries ended foreign ownership of businesses, the entire U.S. economy would collapse.
The economy would collapse and startups would have a hard time raising money are not the same thing. I'm really struggling to think of any reason why the economy would collapse if the owners of businesses changed hands. It quite simply doesn't make any sense in any capacity.
Not to mention the UK's financial services economy which basically survives entirely on aiding and abetting global money laundering schemes.😮
Thanks Patrick!!
Awesome!!
Thanks Patrick. I'm having trouble understanding why anyone would be upset about losing TikTok. CZcams, Facebook, and maybe other platforms offer the same product.
Forcing pensions into domestoc stocks is pretty much using pension contributions to subsidize the corporate sector.
Patrick's sarcasm keeps me watching his videos even though I am not that financially literate. Thanks for what you do!
Thanks Patrick, for a reasoned & intelligent ( rather than just emotive or racist) discussion on this. I feel much better informed.
Imagine all countries forcing apple and google to sell their shares or be banned. Also forcing toyota and honda to sell their shares or they can't sell their cars. Beautiful.. 🌟
Apple, Google, Toyota, Honda is not owned by any government, Tiktok is, if tiktok is not owned by the Chinese government then why are they so mad about the ban? Chinese government is going nuts over this ban but yet almost every US or western social media app and youtube is banned in china and the US government doesn't even care. Tiktok is even banned in China and they have another app in its place that is watered down and only shows what it wants it's people to see
excellent work,sir. Q
I would truly appreciate , if your slides are not flashed just 1.6 seconds but at least 3 seconds . thanks in advance
You can have 1.8 take it or leave it
@@zacheray must be French or Italian - from a German perspective : wishy wooshy - Hektik breathless
Ha - at 1:51 the group shop of 'Canadian Business Leaders' - Patrick kills me ! And then there's the French Government at 9:25 (is nothing sacred ?)
Top tier content as always.
Another great overview of a very complex subject.
Thank you Patrick
Professor Doyle you are the finance professor that I know I wish I had in my MBA program and as I pursue my PhD I pray I can emulate as well.
I agree, but he is Boyle.
MBA are scum of the earth, after lawyers. The only thing they come up with is how to rip off workers. No value was ever generated by MBAs.
Nice channel. You should more vids about basic micro and macroeconomics
I remember learning in school that America had a history of being protectionist when it shouldn’t have been.
It is like my old pappy used to say, "you cannot de-worm a puppy with an axe".
When are they going to fix the ai not blinking bug?
Too many insects in the training data
They fixed the last part "makes no sense" being louder than usual.
@@andriusandraulmao I read this comment right before that happened. *makes no sense*
Was this live premiered damn I missed it love the vids Patrick
The upholstered ottoman as a symbol on your map was beautiful.
an early example of the current business trend to place sofas on streets which ended badly for global trade relations
That Ottoman was definitely blocking the trade route.
I liked the three UK prime ministers picture. with the cabbage in the middle Female cabbage me thinks
Thx Patrick
Thanks to our growing list of Patreon Sponsors and Channel Members for supporting the channel. www.patreon.com/PatrickBoyleOnFinance : Paul Rohrbaugh, Douglas Caldwell, Greg Blake, Michal Lacko, Dougald Middleton, David O'Connor, Douglas Caldwell, Carsten Baukrowitz, hyunjung Kim, Robert Wave, Jason Young, Ness Jung, Ben Brown, yourcheapdate, Dorothy Watson, Michael A Mayo, Chris Deister, Fredrick Saupe, Winston Wolfe, Adrian, Aaron Rose, Greg Thatcher, Chris Nicholls, Stephen, Joshua Rosenthal, Corgi, Adi, maRiano polidoRi, Joe Del Vicario, Marcio Andreazzi, Stefan Alexander, Stefan Penner, Scott Guthery, Peter Bočan, Luis Carmona, Keith Elkin, Claire Walsh, Marek Novák, Richard Stagg, Stephen Mortimer, Heinrich, Edgar De Sola, Sprite_tm, Wade Hobbs, Julie, Gregory Mahoney, Tom, Andre Michel, MrLuigi1138, sugarfrosted, Justin Sublette, Stephen Walker, Daniel Soderberg, John Tran, Noel Kurth, Alex Do, Simon Crosby, Gary Yrag, Mattia Midali, Dominique Buri, Sebastian, Charles, C.J. Christie, Daniel, David Schirrmacher, Ultramagic, Tim Jamison, Deborah R. Moore, Sam Freed,Mike Farmwald, DaFlesh, Michael Wilson, Peter Weiden, Adam Stickney, Agatha DeStories, Suzy Maclay, scott johnson, Brian K Lee, Jonathan Metter, freebird, Alexander E F, Forrest Mobley, Matthew Colter, lee beville, Fernanda Alario, William j Murphy, Atanas Atanasov, Maximiliano Rios, WhiskeyTuesday, Callum McLean, Christopher Lesner, Ivo Stoicov, William Ching, Georgios Kontogiannis, Arvid, Dru Hill, Todd Gross, D F CICU, michael briggs, JAG, Pjotr Bekkering, Jason Harner, Nesh Hassan, Brainless, Ziad Azam, Ed, Artiom Casapu, Eric Holloman, ML, Meee, Carlos Arellano, Paul McCourt, Simon Bone, Richard Hagen, joel köykkä, Alan Medina, Chris Rock, Vik, Fly Girl, james brummel, Jessie Chiu, M G, Olivier Goemans, Martin Dráb, Boris Badinoff, eliott, Bill Walsh, Stephen Fotos, Brian McCullough, Sarah, Jonathan Horn, steel, Izidor Vetrih, Brian W Bush, James Hoctor, Eduardo, Jay T, Claude Chevroulet, Davíð Örn Jóhannesson, storm, Janusz Wieczorek, D Vidot, Christopher Boersma, Stephan Prinz, Norman A. Letterman, georgejr, Keanu Thierolf, Jeffrey, Matthew Berry, pawel irisik, Daniel Ralea, Chris Davey, Michael Jones, Alfred, Ekaterina Lukyanets, Scott Gardner, Viktor Nilsson, Martin Esser, Paul Hilscher, Eric, Larry, Nam Nguyen, Lukas Braszus, hyeora,Swain Gant, Kirk Naylor-Vane, Earnest Williams, Subliminal Transformation, Kurt Mueller, KoolJBlack, MrDietsam, Saaientist, Shaun Alexander, Angelo Rauseo, Bo Grünberger, Henk S, Okke, Michael Chow, TheGabornator, Andrew Backer, Olivia Ney, Zachary Tu, Andrew Price, Alexandre Mah, Jean-Philippe Lemoussu, Gautham Chandra, Heather Meeker, John Martin, Daniel Taylor, Nishil, Nigel Knight, gavin, Arjun K.S, Louis Görtz, Jordan Millar, Molly Carr,Joshua, Shaun Deanesh, Eric Bowden, Felix Goroncy, helter_seltzer, Zhngy, lazypikachu23, Compuart, Tom Eccles, AT, Adgn, STEPHEN INGRAM, Jeremy King, Clement Schoepfer, M, A M, waziam, Deb-Deb, Dave Jones, Julien Leveille, Piotr Kłos, Chan Mun Kay, Kirandeep Kaur, Jacob Warbrick, David Kavanagh, Kalimero, Omer Secer, Yura Vladimirovich, Alexander List, korede oguntuga, Thomas Foster, Zoe Nolan, Mihai, Bolutife Ogunsuyi, Hong Phuc Luong, Old Ulysses, Kerry McClain Paye Mann, Rolf-Are Åbotsvik, Erik Johansson, Nay Lin Tun, Genji, Tom Sinnott, Sean Wheeler, Tom, Артем Мельников, Matthew Loos, Jaroslav Tupý, The Collier Report, Sola F, Rick Thor, Denis R, jugakalpa das, vicco55, vasan krish, DataLog, Johanes Sugiharto, Mark Pascarella, Gregory Gleason, Browning Mank, lulu minator, Mario Stemmann, Christopher Leigh, Michael Bascom, heathen99, Taivo Hiielaid, TheLunarBear, Scott Guthery, Irmantas Joksas, Leopoldo Silva, Henri Morse, Tiger, Angie at Work, francois meunier, Greg Thatcher, justine waje, Chris Deister, Peng Kuan Soh, Justin Subtle, John Spenceley, Gary Manotoc, Mauricio Villalobos B, Max Kaye, Serene Cynic, Yan Babitski, faraz arabi, Marcos Cuellar, Jay Hart, Petteri Korhonen, Safira Wibawa, Matthew Twomey, Adi Shafir, Dablo Escobud, Vivian Pang, Ian Sinclair, doug ritchie, Rod Whelan, Bob Wang, George O, Zephyral, Stefano Angioletti, Sam Searle, Travis Glanzer, Hazman Elias, Alex Sss, saylesma, Jennifer Settle, Anh Minh, Dan Sellers, David H Heinrich, Chris Chia, David Hay, Sandro, Leona, Yan Dubin, Genji, Brian Shaw, neil mclure, Francis Torok, Jeff Page, Stephen Heiner, Peter, Tadas Šubonis, Adam, Antonio, Patrick Alexander, Greg L, Paul Roland Carlos Garcia Cabral, NotThatDan, Diarmuid Kelly, Juanita Lantini, hb, Martin, Julius Schulte, Yixuan Zheng, Greater Fool, Katja K, neosama, Shivani N, HoneyBadger, Hamish Ivey-Law, Ed, Richárd Nagyfi, griffll8, First & Last, Oliver Sun, Soumnek, Neilinnz, Justyna Kolniak, Vasil Papadhimitri and Yoshinao Kumaga
This should be pinned. By not being pinned, it's floating near the bottom of your comments.
“I’ll be forced to become a LinkedIn influencer, the worst kind of influencer”
Both sides of the political/economic issue have very valid concerns, and both need to understand and cooperate with the other.
For the political side, political informed people understand that letting the market run wild is asking to have soft influence pour into your country. By letting foreign companies come into your State, you are enabling the real risk of foreign economic domination, which allows for your country to be at much greater risk of foreign influence, suffer from international economic problems, and make it much harder for Governments to function as strong States. As for calling everything "national security", it's because the amount of components needed for a society to function as a normal, developed place is vast. For example, letting foreign phone and telecommunication companies run wild means that the State has lost control over communications that are vital for the existence of the modern State. Another example with Steel, is that it's one the most important Bread and Butter for any Industrialised State, without Steel being domestically dominated, you risk either becoming an economic puppet of others or even becoming an de-industrialised State.
For the economic side, it is clear by the success of international trade across history that it enables societies to become wealthier. You get access to a greater variance of goods, business opportunities, larger markets, etc. It is hard to deny the great economic improvements world wide since the end of the second world war, with poverty at it's lowest levels, the rise of poor States into wealthy ones thanks to foreign investment, States that have focused on exporting goods aboard, etc. Hence to abandon this understanding is to risk societies having greater limits on their own current and future wealth.
So when one side or the other brings up their points, don't dismiss them because they can both be correct.
In my own personal view, I think it's fine to mandate a portion of investment to be domestic as it can generate greater internal wealth and prosperity, with less foreign risk, however it shouldn't develop into an "all eggs in one basket" as then when the country's economy stuggles, then the hit to people's stocks will be worse. States should both encourage foreign investment, and allow them to have a share of the market, however never to the extend that they risk dominating sectors of the economy. It must be ok for individual companies to fail or be brought out, but never to the extend that societies risk de facto loss of sectors of their economy.
Think about how poor we would all be if we restricted our trade to only the people who live on our block, or even to people within 10, or even fifty, miles of us...
There wss a time in human history when people risked their lives to trade more broadly. Now we are blessed with the ability to trade world-wide, and we consider it a curse.
Good argument, ignore all the nuance, don't address any counter arguments, just claim its an unadulterated good.
In Canada our economic system is an oligopoly, with all economic sectors split between a select number of players and heavy regularized.
The further downside to this static system is that companies cannot compete with each other at all as they providing the same products in their respective lanes with none having any competitive advantage, with almost identical prices which are higher than the equivalents in competing eonomies and not offering a real incentive for customers to choose, and most importantly this means they cannot grow anymore than their current size due to the imposed limitations of our system.
So the only way to get some extra profit is by getting some fresh investments to help their stock increase a bit and get those diivdends out to all stakeholders.
Its pure and simple quarterly capitalism and I am personally happy that the pension funds have given them the cold shoulder. Pensions funds in Canada are autonomous from any political interference and are some of the best performing pension investment funds in the world, actually being most profitable in 2021.
So there you have it!
Don't worry we have an oligarchy here in the US too (in most sectors). Pretty much the trend of markets.
True, but in Canada , it’s a legally created and *enforced* oligopoly.
Yes you are correct it is a legal one and kept in check by regularization ...@@Muljinn
Best channel on the Tube!!
8:00
can't wait to enjoy your first rap song, i am all in
Actually, US Steel falls under the national security umbrella insofar as foreign ownership and control is concerned. For most nations whose steel production is a significant sector of their economy, it's a strategic industry, thus bringing it under a protectionist posture.
It's also one of those things where if, suddenly, you're in a World War and global trade begins to do an oopsie-collapsey, having your own Steel Production becomes VITAL for the production, of, say... Most Military Hardware.
No the strategic value isn't much related to share of economy but rather use of steel in military hardware, in times of war a foreign owned steel plant can cause problems.
People are screaming about tiktok while the biggest oil refinery in the western hemisphere was allowed to be sold to the Saudis by the trump administration. That seems to be a bigger threat.
@user-hz6fj9xy4y still it won't be as seemless as domestically owned , it will also give japan an extra leverage many situations.
It’s because most UK infrastructure is privitised so it’s hard to relate
UK equities have a stamp tax, a complete idiocy. Most retail trade CFDs and many foreigners are banned from trading CFDs by their own countries. UK is being punished for its own bad decisions.
Great video as always. It's important to look at these protectionist measures as strategic, not economical. If they were purely economic decisions, than more globalism would be the obvious choice as it benefits both large corporations and consumers. These moves are more in the direction of gearing up for large scale conflict
What the Russia - Ukraine conflict showed the world more than anything is that some players are willing to risk their economy to reach political goals, throwing out the shortsighted idea that wars in advanced nations were a thing of the past. If this is the case, than many so called advanced nations are completely unprepared and vulnerable to attack.
For example, the US gets 92% of its advanced chips from Taiwan. If China and the US were to get into a conflict, than China would easily cut off TSMC, crippling many different industries at once and ultimately crashing the stock market over night. China also depends on these chips, so they would risk collapsing their own economy, especially if the US and allies shut down Chinese shipping routes. The reason this is a threat is because China does not view a strong economy with the same gleam in the eyes as western nations. They view it as a tool to gain power. If their economy collapsed, China wouldnt just survive, the CCP would get stronger. They have more leverage in a country where their population is more dependent. The US system on the other hand would completely collapse if the economy was in disrepair.
Tomorrow's losers are the ones who play yesterday's game today. We are in the era of war games
Not even strategic as that implies some coherency and benefit for the nation. It is pure selfish tribal politics
@@JinkypigsI'm not implying it. I'm saying it. Protectionism enforces national security which is clearly a benefit to you and everyone you know. Tribal politics is unselfish by nature. It would be more selfish to sell access to the highest bidder and expand beyond your borders. Tribalism is just propaganda that the people prefer over the truth, which is that your leaders can no longer compete in critical ways, and need to withdraw to avoid being taken over. Nationalists have nothing to say about industries they are globally competent in. There is a pattern if you look for it. They are not banning random companies. You might not agree with war, but you have to respect the importance it plays on every level
I love your commitment to educate. Okay people you just have to have a balanced portfolio and it makes even better sense if its global think about it...
You bring me laughs out loud like nobody else. Love your humor and knowledge keep it up!
Thanks Patrick, out of all of the globally recognised and hyper cool rappers that I follow you are definitely the most informative. The subtleness of your bling is more than compensated with your global economic evaluations so please keep it up you boujee mo-fo. 🤘😎
i hope we will get a rap video on april 1st!
Very nice setting.
Theres also something foolish about not taking into account the typical person's ROI, in Engand for example, from investing at home and improving infrastructure, the NHS or whatever else. To so narrowly interpret ROI of the investments as the return the individual sees accrue to their portfolio is to incorrectly allocate savers funds and egregiously miss the full benefit they experience from their investments improving their living standards.
No, you need to look at the marginal case. Sure, the sum of everyone investing locally helps the citizens, but an individual citizen investing abroad instead would lower their own external benefit by not even a millionth
I love this dry humor so much. "...LinkedIn Influencer, the worst kind of influencer..." I was so glad I wasn't taking a sip of my coffee at that bit.
0:08
Side note, but RIP Spitting Image revival. Taken too soon.
16:35 the visual representation of the "Ottoman" Empire had me in stitches
The ottoman image for the Ottoman empire had me dying 😂😂😂
I almost did a spit take when I saw that ottoman graphic pop up. LOL.
Great and informative video… thanks Patrick
OMG when the white noise/tumble dryer stops @10:35 ❤❤❤
7:00 What's that background washing machine-chalkboard-cuttingboard noise?
It ain’t Patrick’s day! It is saint patricks day I’m not listening to this anymore
I’m getting hammered!
Patrick really enjoy your channel, however very curious do you speak from memory or are you reading a teleprompter or cards. Anyway keep up the great work.
This kind of protectionism assumes that the money that is paid for a product is more valuable tham the product itself - which is nonsensical. Otherwise, we would see laws restricting goods that a country produces be kept for sale only at home.
Everybody wants to SELL globally, they just want to restrict their neighbors to have to BUY locally.
true
Your finest video from the panic room yet, Patrick!
Great video as usual although you should fire your Foley guy.
You are a better news source than all major biased channels. May I suggest P Trick as your rap name? Thank you.
Bytedance is a Chinese company, and in China they have a law wherein a company should obey whatever the government wants them to do, (or the government will take them down.)
And of course, Bytedance will have access to Tiktok's database wherever it is located.
Have you heard of Silicon Valley? They & ex Intelligence officials work hand in glove to do the same thing to you. 😂
Which of course is different in the US right? The US definitely doesn't have secret wiretapping courts that rubber stamps everything.
I went to tik tok and I can't find the video at 0:10. Do you have a link?
That Linkedin Influencer story😆
Here in the USA, we are very concerned about TikTok being run by a Chinese company. However, no one ever talks about Lenovo and Lenovo subsidiary Motorola also being Chinese-run companies. Banning or forcing the sale of TikTok would be electoral suicide for the Democrats. Younger voters tend to vote for Democrats. Taking away TikTok could prompt them not to vote at all, thereby losing an important Democratic voting bloc. That could lead to Republican control yet again, and likely the end of democracy in the USA.
I honestly don't see the problem? Tiktok has an inherent character to it that is more audience and creator driven than by ownership, so it's still going to be a youth platform that it is. It appears to be capable of sustaining itself.
The usa is a hypocrite,tik tok is a cesspool but so is twitter, they banned huawei from using american tech like gms and the brand died internationally and that helped apple with xiaomi taking the bottom end of consumers, motorola only has 3.5% of usa market share and xiaomi 1.14, they only care about tiktok because is winning over usa social media and yes tiktok isn´t profitable but investors also care about growing market share.
Everyone already knows the usa does the same thing with usa big tech,they also are know to spy on their allies
TikTok is not going to be the deciding factor in this election with two almost universally reviled candidates.
In addition, while I am concerned about the free speech aspect of banning TikTok (literally only got off the ground because younger generations were being vocally supportive of Palestine), in a country where Rupert Murdock couldn't buy Fox News until he became an American citizen, why aren't we regulating something that has far more free speech impact than news from Chinese interference? There's a reason why Alibaba can't buy CNN.
I wouldn't say nobody. The US government stopped issuing contracts to or using Lenovo some years ago and voiced these concerns and some planned Lenovo acquisitions have been blocked for national security reasons.
@@riotintheairIt is much different stopping government contracts with a Chinese company and entirely prohibiting their products and services to be used by consumers. I have not heard anyone who wants to ban Lenovo products completely from the US consumer and business markets.
My takeaway from the video: Europeans don't understand tech and pay more attention to cash flow (or EPS). It seems to me that they are more conservative than the US.
Let's see if Stelco from Canada is allowed to buy US Steel. It would be ironic if they blocked that too considering US Steel was allowed to buy Stelco a decade ago.
Dont worry Patrick in Ireland all is well no questions asked where the monies come from as long as they keep coming 😂
Moment please. Is it possible to buy shares of Bytedance?
Or are we talking about pseudo ADR Cayman Islands worthless paper?
There seems to be back ground noise coming from the warp in this video!
Were your kids all over the background? And was someone lighting up the stove at one point😂😂😂😂😂😂
Thats the funniest video ive seen online. Authentic
6:13 not most ALL
“TikTok Finance Rapper” meme is one of your best jokes ever. That got a good LOL out of me. Nice one, Patrick.
12:40 "YOU BEEN PLAYING THE FOOTSIE AGAIN??"
Bytedance probably has an NDA preventing them admitting anything.