This is NEXT LEVEL! AI Upscaling that Pushes BEYOND the boundaries of Photography.
Vložit
- čas přidán 9. 01. 2024
- Magnific's new 16x upscaler is a highly advanced tool designed for image upscaling and enhancement. This tool stands out for its ability to not only upscale images by a significant factor but also to enhance and reimagine the details in those images. It uses Generative AI to achieve these results, allowing users to add as many details as they wish through a guided process involving prompts and various parameters.
▼ Link(s) From Today’s Video:
Magnific ai: magnific.ai/upgrade/
Magnific's CEO: / 1744153523762155895
Proper Prompter's thread: / 1744698041683132586
Martin's Thread: / 1744724765569659210
► MattVidPro Discord: / discord
► Follow Me on Twitter: / mattvidpro
-------------------------------------------------
▼ Extra Links of Interest:
✩ AI LINKS MASTER LIST: www.futurepedia.io/
✩ General AI Playlist: • General MattVidPro AI ...
✩ AI I use to edit videos: www.descript.com/?lmref=nA4fDg
✩ Instagram: mattvidpro
✩ Tiktok: tiktok.com/@mattvidpro
✩ Second Channel: / @matt_pie
-------------------------------------------------
Thanks for watching Matt Video Productions! I make all sorts of videos here on CZcams! Technology, Tutorials, and Reviews! Enjoy Your stay here, and subscribe!
All Suggestions, Thoughts And Comments Are Greatly Appreciated… Because I Actually Read Them.
-------------------------------------------------
► Business Contact: MattVidProSecond@gmail.com - Věda a technologie
$39 monthly for the first tier is completely insane. Pure greed for a simple upscale that can be done using a free stable diffusion model and a comfyui workflow.
Agree. I tried to use their 24 hour free trial but it wouldn't even let me after the dude was telling everyone to go crazy
And 40 bucks a month is LITERALLY more expense than any other subscriptions service I've ever seen. I never even considered using this service due to its price. I don't care about your gpus. If you price is 480 dollars a year. Then I want nothing of it
Or it can be done for free in Automatic1111 with the Ultimate SD Upscale extension script, I have done plenty of 8k and 12K images that look as good as this.
Not exactly a ‘simple’ upscale at 16x bruv
consider that within a year this service will be redundant too, so paying per year is absolutely braindead@@JojoSmacks
Better to pay for a magnificent ai upscaler that has the right codes than having to write excessive prompts imo
Awesome video, Matt! We get excited for when new tools like this are announced, and the way you walk us through how it works and what we can expect from it is top notch.
Great video, congratulations i appreciate it! I mean, it's funny to see how you are investigating these over zoomed hallucinations, which is kinda new type of content to watch. Keep it up.
Stop advertising for this greedy company. These new features are a non factor as long as they're charging these insane prices.
Who in their right mind can justify the $40-90 per month for a glorified upscaler?
It's cheap for a business IF the output was on par... but it hallucinates all these gross artifacts that destroys the original texture of the source 'photographic' image.
@@RedRisotto Didn't try Magnifica but others - Krea AI and open-source counterparts - distort the identity of faces.
Topaz is better, this mag not real upscaler.
This same like sd extensions upscale which resulting gross details.
A first glance the "upscaling" looks really impressive, but then it starts to fall apart because the text is wrong, there are random details that shouldn't be there, there are missing details you wanted to keep, the eyes can be really creepy if you are using photos of people you know and suddenly they have different eyes.
I think we have to stop calling it upscaling though, because it just isn't, we need a term that means resized and re-imagined
i bet its just stable diffusion on the backend, they just made a nice frontend
In case this hasn't been suggested as a video idea Matt: I'd love to see you go back and watch/react to one of your AI videos from 18 months ago, just so we can see how excited you were back then for Midjourney 3/4 and Dall E 2 , and to see how far AI has advanced since then :)
great idea
Damn, feel old
Hi Matt! I'm Jess from VOC AI, absolutely loving every second of your content! 🌟Keep the awesome content coming, I'm here for it! :)
Very detailed review Matt. Even if it’s perfect I will not pay for it. ✨✨🙏✨✨ Thank you
Its not worth it! So overpriced DO NOT become a slave to subscriptions. Boycott Magnific until they get reasonable on their Eff'n pricing!
Ok, now I won't be able to tell if an image is made by AI.
But AI will be able to.
I think you could tell by the details hallucination.
@@romulosouzasantos8711 Exactly! Using this up-scaler makes the image more obviously AI manipulated. It adds a lot of gross and random artifacts.
@@romulosouzasantos8711 I think the hallucinations may be caused by the settings Matt is using. I only adjust the sliders very slightly and rarely get hallucinations.
Only one, yes AI. 🙂 We even forgot what is human.
maybe this works even better with non ai images. if you give the upscaler a relatively messy image to start with (small details in ai images are messed up/hallucinated pretty often), it exaggerates that. I also think that its not as good with faces, human and animal.
damn this looks like next version of image to image generation!
when magnific changes their ridiculous price i'll join
Let's goo wish they had video upscale at magnific for the cost rather use local like u Showed us last time but his is mind blowing ❤ n love ur authenticity n truth n testing self
Eh. Pricing is insane. Topaz still worth
This sh*ts on topaz but pricing is nuts
@@ElectricAlienCat Topaz doesn't hallucinate... and is more predictable.
Sure, but output not nearly as detailed. You gotta do a few variations in Mag to get what you want@@RedRisotto
Still not paying $40
I discuss this absolute insane pricing at the end of the video. They really need to adjust it
@@MattVidProyes, so why make such a long advertisement? One minute would have been enough…
@@jondoe8o it's not an advertisement, this is an evaluation of a never before seen advancement in ai imaging
Love your videos. I hope one of your New Year's resolutions was upgrading your channel's new videos to 4K. It would really help when displaying high resolution content. Thanks.
Matt, have you seen the latest update to the Krea beta? Some new features in the upscaler.
You can make more upscale with Stable Difusion.
But they're not as good, because I don't know how to prompt good
@@user-jp7vk3mn1lSkill issue😂
Great review
Seems like you could make some crazy zoom animations that recursively take an image, use AI to get a description, upscale a cropped section using that description as a prompt, and feed that back into the loop, continually zooming into the cropped sections.
I would pay $10 a month to get access to just the 2X upscale, but really I cant justify $40 even with this 16X update.
16x upscale costs 80+ credits 😢
@@ElectricAlienCat insanity
Reselling your subscription 1 picture for 1 $ seems profitable. I'm definitely not buying one month subscription for one or two pictures.
They are pricing this for professional use, but the level of hallucination going on here isn't delivering professional results, at least not without quite a bit of Photoshopping. I thought the freakiest thing was the realistic finger on the lemon! I would like to try using this though but that $39 for less than pro results are really putting me off. Thanks for the helpful video!
I love upscaling my old family photos!
Awesome use case for this!
@@MattVidProyou know there mermbership plans are way too expensive we need something like this for free not under a paywall or mouthy payment that over 30 dollars
@@NicVandEmZ I just did a video on a similar free local running upscaler
I tried this with maps and I am pleased :)
The fact it can generate faces or other details in places they don't belong REALLY creeps me out. I'm avoiding this AI 😬
I'm diving right into this the moment my dad and I purchase this
yea.. if i want a massive upscale without hallucinated details.. just use upscayle locally, which is free and has a upper limit of 32.000 by 32.000 pixels (tested it when upscaling a 512x512 generation and it kept all details (including clothing fibers you barely make out at 512 x 512)
Yup, ew, true
I think that you may be getting some of those strange effects because you have resemblance set very high. I've found the best results with resemblance set at 2 (maximum 4), and with creativity set somewhere between -2 and +2. I don't touch HDR. The example you did with your portrait is almost certainly strange because of the high resemblance, which tends to introduce blotches.
There's no way around those glitches. A different algorithm is needed.
It's happen on sd when denoising is too high and more than 2x
I like the video and it’s awesome upscaling, however the pricing… I’d never bother.
That’s why these channels exist so they can showcase where the peak of the technology is even if the public doesn’t use it
@@zrakonthekrakon494that's why I'm going to ask him to upscale a video game texture
As a test
Magnific Pro - $39 per month
200 normal upscales/mo
100 large upscales/mo
Magnific Premium - $99 per month
550 normal upscales/mo
250 large upscales/mo
Magnific Enterprise - $299 per month
1600 normal upscales/mo
800 large upscales/mo
2 hours support/mo via video call
If they cut the cost to $ 15 / mo,, they would sell more by volume. People are already paying for a lot of other production costs.
Totally agree!
Computing power costs money I think that's why they'd rather have higher prices over higher volume.
Too late. Freeloaders already have open-source counterparts: 🤖 *`fewjative/ultimate-sd-upscale`* and 🤖 *`batouresearch/high-resolution-controlnet-tile`.* So Magnifica wouldn't gain many customers by decreasing the price.
I knew it!!! this is amazing!!!
There's no telling how good the textures are going to be
At least that's what I hope
I like the creative side of it but is it true that this bug occurs on AI generated images or all images like textures and what not? I feel like I'm missing out on a lot of important information here as I'm going to get this in 2 days from now and seeing it for myself
The upscales of your dog looked great to me, but you know your dog's face so it's reimagining/hallucinations would have really stood out to you
Great post. I’m glad you’re covering this tool. I did the month to try it out and thought it was crazy expensive too, but I like the results and think it could be a good tool if you’re running a profitable business and find the great features it has useful. Love your posts man.
When magnific starts charging $15/mo for unlimited generations, maybe I'll consider
"Our team is working hard and tirelessly to bring you that deal within the next 7 years" 😭🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂
@@puffytheangel483 the price is honestly insulting
@@spacekitt.n For a consumer 100% from there perspective though no cuz you gotta keep in mind there the only ones doing it this good and it's only 2 guys so there busting there ass to run everything so the payoff has to be worth it god knows how much reworking to stable Diffusion they had to do to effectively and efficiently provide this type of service on top of all that they probably don't have major backing so they need to make enough to justify there work and also keep there servers up and there probably limited hardware up to do the job like most people said probably as they scale up prices will go down but to a degree I kinda understand the ridiculous pricing
@@puffytheangel483 they could make just as much if not more money by charging half as much because more people will buy it. but yeah the only reason i could think of why they have it so high is limited hardware
The future of this technology is a combination of a controlled version of the "infinite zoon" and video diffusion. This is the first look at the beginnings of life-like simulations. Soon textures pixilating when you get closer to them will be a thing of the past. Welcome to the future everyone.
What do you think of Videoproc?
In one month my prediction is that A.I music will get much much better
Matt keep pumping iron but also those vids bro...
Nice video! However, I wanted to say that lots of your complaints of the AI model's outputs were actually coming from the original image (your cats eyes being "human-like" were already in the original because it's eyes were dilated, the orange cat's strange right eye was already in the image, etc.)
Upscaling + changing. Little big clarification.
this is a restylizer
It would be interesting to see what it generates on multiple zoom enhance cycles
Thanks for tis video, it is great, also gave me a laugh
100000% agree that its way too expensive, and is frustrating to waste so much experimenting, but Javi is taking advantage of being first to the party.
Magnific: Harnessing AI 'hallucinations' for BIGtime upscaling.
No matter how good a service is, if it doesn't have a price point, it's not going to be a hit...and that's a shame.
Anyway, I enjoy watching the videos every time.
Sixteen Times The Detail! It Just Works!
The super high res result of the rose looks way too noisy imo.
Also, this is stable diffusion. Just use ultimate SD upscale.
I wouldn't call it noisy... I would call it "random artifacts..." But yes, I understand what you are trying to express, and I agree. Random crap is more difficult (time consuming) to deal with than noise.
God damn the greed from this company 😂 for pictures 😂😂😂😂
Great tool for most scenarios. ❤ but I’m not sure about those AI created wrong details.
it looks to me like someone's trying to "upscale us" financaly 😂
I hope Topaz AI feels triggered now with those 2 new upscalers, working on they own type of version which could be great because it could then combine both worlds, restoration and just upscaleing.
By "2 new upscalers" do you mean Magnific and Krea?
@@contrarian8870 yes
yeah that'd be awesome
Makes me wonder what an image of Midgar from Final Fantasy 7 Renake would look like when ran through this... But I'm n9ot paying no 40 bones a month
thats the problem it is stitching them together, i have accomplished this sort of upscale in sdxl, and get the same problems.
x16, that's insane, however they need to fix the weird hallucinations like feather tongue and other out of context things
While I agree, I also think those hallucinations add a ton of intrigue to the image. Like Imagine a huge print of that Bee.. as you go up to look closer you start to see all these strange details... a bird perched on the tiny tip of a wing that looks like it's made of wood.. almost like an eye-spy book.
@@joelface yea I do think it's cool in a way, but it should be an option you can check on/off if you want imagined things or not.
Magnific is not an upscaler, it's also ridiculously expensive.
Cloud flair verify cant access the site.
Magnific gotta trade name with Meta, no fair. Want pixels more sharp than my brain.
How about a nice local open source upscaler?
Mcaw inception lol 🐦
Thank god... now be able to tell if the blurry UFO pics are real or not...😂
My phone does 50MP but it's nice to double that
ESRGan + SDXL enhancer can do something quite similar...
Someones got free access 😂 no one aint paying that subscription!
The BEST upscaler in the world is still Upscayl
They're pricing themselves out of the market. Big miss with the pricing. Their pricing is more expensive than some adobe subscriptions.
For upscaling, its more important to use a real photo, not an AI image as source. If i want to upscale a photo, i dont want it to add in things that arent there.
Seems like your contradicting yourself there a little. If you upscale a real photo it will have more realistic data to draw from, but you'll also notice the mistakes a lot more. It's hallucinations will all be different from real life. However, if you upscale an AI image, the advantage is that the hallucinations or details it adds may improve the image or make it more compelling overall. There is no "real life" version for it to deviate from, per se. That said, I think there are exceptions to the rule, and one of the coolest functions may be upscaling old artwork or something along those lines.
An image of a pony with pineapples for 3 legs.
Anyone here use Magnific and notice parts of large upscales (8x +) have out of focus errors using art & illustration. There shouldn't be anything out of focus for art & illustration everything should be sharp (unlike photos)! Wasted some big credits Not sure if adding a 'sharp focus' in the prompt will fix it. Otherwise, the app is pretty awesome but pricey!
24:26 - Right? I also think they are way too expensive, I wish their basic one was not more than $10 -$15 per month but ignoring their high price tag I still think Magnific AI are the best AI upscaler out there, they're the current kings of AI upscaling, I'd love to have a true competitor of free AI upscaling that can actually produce AI upscales that are on par with Magnific AI but so far no one even comes close to their quality of extra realism of details it can give to images.
still mostly interested in opensource versions of things like this. not rediculous monthly payments.
way too expensive
Now you don't need an amazing camera, take it with a regular camera like the iPhone 13 and then Magnific can make it look like an expensive camera.
Actually Matt, there is a green wing macaw and not a scarlet macaw AI. Get confused with the two lol
Crazy
The D.O.F is all over the place
They use stable diffusion there's a script that do something like this in automatic 11 it's just not that refined
We need to see your opinion on the Rabbit r 1😱
will give opinion on dis soon
Try an overhead image taken from Google Maps
Matt, I was wondering something
Feel like I'm not getting enough information on the whole website of Magnific ai
Not enough in these videos
I was going to ask you a question about upscaling textures from video games but seeing as how I'm going to get this by the hour I don't think there's any need to
How much did they pay you, Matt? XD😂
"Upscaling" is quite the liberal term here. It's substantially changing the original image. In many cases completely removing important elements of the original. Like entire massive objects fully replaced. I think we need to describe this as something other than upscaling. That's not what it is.
this is a restylizer…
I think ai-upscaler is fine. the a stands for artificial.
@@joelface Upscaling generally refers to when you add information between the pixels to make the original image sharper. This tool completely replaces large chunks of the images and sometimes gives you an entirely different image as a base. It's not an upscaler. @ciba20 is right to call it a restylizer. An actual upscaler would be like Topaz Labs AI upscaling tools. Magnific is not that.
@@Skapo So you're saying that the upscaling is artificial?
@@joelface No, I'm saying it's not upscaling at all. It completely replaces the image with a new one. Upscaling means that you add information between each pixel. It's the rough equivalent of making a vector image instead of a pixel for pixel jpeg image. With an upscaler you won't suddenly have a brand new face that replaces the old one. It won't replace planters with buckets. This is an image generator, not an upscaler. A true upscaler is something like Topaz AI. Adobe also has a couple new things they are working on. Magnific is NOT an upscaler. We should quit calling it that.
Disappointed you didn't take your shoes and socks off to illustrate 16x for us
how u kno i didnt
:42 hallucinates?
The price alone is awful, but what annoys me most is your credits will disappear if you stop paying and don’t use them. I had around 1600 credits left, and now they’re just gone.
Sounds illegal.
WTF
@@Mavrik9000 They do have within their terms of service: "Cancellations are effective at the end of the current billing cycle. Your Tokens will be set to zero at the end of the current billing cycle." But like I spent $40 on a screen that didn't mention that and only says, "Make around 200 normal upscales and 100 large ones per month."
I did do many upscales within that month, but not near the amount I paid for.
Great, but too expensive
$39 a month? I can live with slightly less quality for free or like $10 per month, I don't care about doing this very often, it may be in certain rare cases when I can't find a big enough image for whatever I need.
Cool nontheless.
It costs so much per month that I would expect them to deliver real humans to you instead of just images LOL
Magnificient is not an actual upscaler though. It creates fake information often unrelated to the starting image.
but it remains too expensive
Price is prohibitive.
it's not new at all it's tile upscaling.. you can do that for free on your computer with automatic1111 or comfy UI
Not true Matt, there are phones that take 108 mp shots, not just $8k cameras
👋
جودتها مذهلة ولاكن المشكلة أنها ليست مجانية
cutie
do we really need 16x upscale? well definitely not at this price
It's not free!