crpc 125 New Judgment / Supreme Court latest Judgement / MAINTENANCE CASE AGAINST HUSBAND / IN Hindi

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 6. 09. 2024
  • Rajnesh Vs Neha Supreme Court Judgement / Crpc 125 New Judgment / MAINTENANCE LAW / Hindi / LATEST / MAINTENANCE CASE AGAINST HUSBAND / crpc 125 New Judgment / Supreme Court latest Judgement / MAINTENANCE CASE AGAINST HUSBAND / IN Hindi
    ◆MY MIC - amzn.to/3lA9vHD
    - amzn.to/3CoU6jh
    ◆MY CAMERA - amzn.to/3lB2si3
    ◆MY LAPTOP - amzn.to/3AltMoF
    ◆MY GORILA TRIPOD MINI - amzn.to/2U2QQJi
    ◆MY TRIPOD - amzn.to/3fBeZ11
    ◆MY HEADPHONE - amzn.to/3lCScpd
    ◆CAMERA BACKPACK - amzn.to/3CjJS3R
    ◆IMPORTANT JUDGMENTS BOOK - amzn.to/3AgKXYs
    Judgement pdf link
    drive.google.c...
    JOIN THE DESCRIPTIVE GYAN TELEGRAM CHANNEL TO GET THE PDF & LEGAL NEWS
    t.me/Descripti...
    2nd EDUCATIONAL CHANNEL --
    @SURETY CENTER ( ONLY FOR STUDENTS )
    / @suretycenter
    Other Informative Videos Playlist @Descriptive Gyan
    1] FOR CHEQUE BOUNCE 138 NI ACT , CIVIL SUITS AND MONEY RECOVERY
    • N.I.Act related videos
    2] INDIAN PENAL CODE LECTURE
    • Indian penal code lecture
    3] MAINTENANCE AND 498A
    • MAINTENANCE AND 498A C...
    4] DV ACT CASES
    • D.V.Act videos
    5] PROPERTY LAWS
    • PROPERTY LAW
    6] MATRIMONIAL VIDEOS
    • Matrimonial videos
    7] LEGAL GYAN
    • Legal GYAN
    8] SHORTS
    • #Shorts
    9] CONSTITUTION LECTURE
    • INDIAN POLITY LECTURE
    Other Social Links
    CZcams - / @suretycenter
    Facebook- / descriptivelaw.gyan
    Instagram- / descriptivegyan
    Telegram- t.me/Descripti...
    If you like this please do not forget to subscribe my channel, like my video and share with your friends.
    Subscription is free, you just have to press red color subscribe button and press the bell icon.
    Disclaimer :
    Some contents are used for educational purpose under fair use. Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use. All credit for copyright materiel used in video goes to respected owner.
    This publication and the information included in it are not intended to serve as a substitute for
    consultation with an attorney. Specific legal issues, concerns and conditions always require the advice of appropriate legal professionals. The use of the Internet for communications with the firm will not establish an attorney-client relationship and messages containing confidential or time- sensitive information should not be sent.
    #SCLatestjudgement #crpc125NewJudgment #Crpc125 #RAJNESH_VS_NEHA #Maintenance #RajneshVSneha #newjudgement #125crpcMaintenancecaseinfamilycourt
    #SupremecourtLatestJudgement #CaseLaw #Guidelines
    #DescriptiveLawGyan #Grounds #Hindi #NEWRULESDIRECTIONS #Latestjudgment #descriptivegyan

Komentáře • 639

  • @mrabhi100k
    @mrabhi100k Před 3 lety +147

    जब तक "भारतीय पुरुष आयोग"(National Commission of Men🇮🇳") नही बनेगा तब तक
    बेकसूर पुरुषों पर झूठे आरोप लगते रहेंगे।

    • @dr.mithunhazarika2016
      @dr.mithunhazarika2016 Před 3 lety +6

      Shadi mat kar, gf bana aur maze le ....

    • @IrshadKhan-yt4os
      @IrshadKhan-yt4os Před 3 lety +10

      Right
      Jhutha case me agar patni ko bhi saja ka prawdhan ho to sari samasya khatam ho jayegi...isliye purush aayog jaroori hai...

    • @ajayfaujdar7275
      @ajayfaujdar7275 Před 3 lety +10

      @@dr.mithunhazarika2016 gf भी रेप के केस में फसा के पैसा ऐठ सकती है, भाई आदमी कही भी सेफ नहीं है

    • @dipakbera5234
      @dipakbera5234 Před 3 lety +3

      ekdam sahi.

    • @buntychandel8914
      @buntychandel8914 Před 3 lety +5

      95%false case hote jai 498a k

  • @gokulchandra9249
    @gokulchandra9249 Před 2 lety +2

    Nice dicision of Supreme Court of India.Jay Hind

  • @nandansinghnegi
    @nandansinghnegi Před 2 lety +7

    Awekning directions given by honorable Supreme Court.

  • @vikarshmaurya
    @vikarshmaurya Před 3 lety +14

    आपके समझाने का तरीका बहुत ही अच्छा है बहुत ही विस्तार से समझते हो। डिस्क्रिप्टिव ज्ञान सटीक है चैनल का नाम

    • @DescriptiveGyan
      @DescriptiveGyan  Před 3 lety +1

      Thank you sir for your appreciation 🙏🏻🙏🏻

  • @krishnamohanranga9507
    @krishnamohanranga9507 Před 2 lety +3

    अच्छी जानकारी
    ज्यादातर झूठे केस में महिलाएं अपने पति पर आरोप लगाती है व क्रिमिनल केस दर्ज कराया जाता है दहेज प्रताड़ना का जब की सत्य नही होता

  • @nandlalpathak2279
    @nandlalpathak2279 Před 2 lety +3

    बहुत बहुत धन्यवाद आपका महोदय जी, आपका कल्याण हो।

  • @rajugupta99
    @rajugupta99 Před 2 lety +1

    जो मेरे भाई पत्नी द्वारा किए गए झूठे मुकदमे से परेशान हैं उनके साथ मेरी संवेदना भगवान उनके साथ न्याय करें ज़िन्दगी बद से बद्तर हों जाती है

  • @kulwant6132a
    @kulwant6132a Před 2 lety +8

    Family courts don't bother about supreme court judgment and rulings. Supreme Court should make sure that all lower courts should implement this rule strictly.

  • @deshrajgautam9857
    @deshrajgautam9857 Před 2 lety +1

    कोर्ट का आर्डर सराहनीय है । बहुत सी महिलाएं पढी लिखी होने
    के बावजूद न तो नौकरी करती हैं और न कोई बिजनेस करना चाहती हैं
    केवल अपने अनाप सनाप खर्चों का बोझ अपने पति पर डाल देती हैं ।
    यानी कि साथ भी नही रहना चाहती , कोई जिम्मेदारी भी नही उठाना चाहती
    लेकिन तलाक के बाद भी पूरा खर्चा पति से ही लेंगी ।
    ऐसी औरतों को आदेश दिया जाना चाहिए कि घर से बाहर निकलें और
    कोई काम करें ताकि पता चले कि उसका पति कितनी मुसीबत और ठोकर
    खाकर पैसा कमाता है ।

    • @sampatlalgupta6667
      @sampatlalgupta6667 Před 2 lety +1

      बिल्कुल सही कहा। मुंशी प्रेमचंद जैसे नामी लेखकों ने ऐसी प्रवृति के लोगों को हराम खोर कहा है।

  • @koushikghosh7387
    @koushikghosh7387 Před 2 lety +2

    it depends on judge ....and in india judge never give verdict in favour of husband...ek min me case file side me
    uda dege ...jaiye challenge kijiye S.C apka right hai bol k ....

  • @gajanantikekar3800
    @gajanantikekar3800 Před 2 lety +1

    बहुत बढ़िया जजमेंट है आभारी हूँ

  • @trivediupma4049
    @trivediupma4049 Před 3 lety +8

    अति उत्तम. भाषा शैली.. पढ़ाने का ढंग. सब अच्छा

  • @thenvsacademy7927
    @thenvsacademy7927 Před 3 lety +4

    Good judgement. The role of women is changing in the age old conservative Indian society! ✔️

  • @navneetsharmavbn1
    @navneetsharmavbn1 Před 3 lety +8

    You have described very well. Thanks.

  • @pranky1986
    @pranky1986 Před 2 lety +4

    रिश्ते कभी भी स्वाभाविक मौत नहीं मरते। उनकी अहंकार, मनोवृत्ति और अज्ञानता द्वारा हत्या की जाती है। - बुद्ध

  • @kaloladilip9276
    @kaloladilip9276 Před 3 lety +4

    Very nice video
    It is very important for our socities
    Thanks you sir

  • @poojamandal.7356
    @poojamandal.7356 Před 2 lety +3

    Thank you so much sir 😊😊😊😊😊

  • @tanveerbaig5948
    @tanveerbaig5948 Před 2 lety +3

    Thank you so much for this information

  • @affua4416
    @affua4416 Před 3 lety +10

    Sir, thank you soo much for sharing this immense information.

  • @ravishgoel8718
    @ravishgoel8718 Před 3 lety +11

    I was waiting for your video sir, always very clear and useful

  • @goutammukherjee3673
    @goutammukherjee3673 Před rokem +1

    It is a benificial for men & wise judgement...👌🙏🙏

  • @vgupta9875
    @vgupta9875 Před 2 lety +9

    Excellent step by supreme court and nice information about this given .

  • @khannaseer5010
    @khannaseer5010 Před 3 lety +7

    Good judgment by Supreme Court

  • @AdvSantoshCZalteSillodDistAura

    Thanks for your Nice new and latest information
    Really you have explained very Nicely
    धन्यवाद

  • @SimpleHandel
    @SimpleHandel Před 3 lety +4

    धन्यवाद ! बहुतही कामकि बाते बताई है आपने.

  • @RajeevKumar-eg5jr
    @RajeevKumar-eg5jr Před 2 lety +1

    Excellent videos

  • @SunilSunil-tz6by
    @SunilSunil-tz6by Před 3 lety +1

    पुरुष आयोग जिंदाबाद

  • @debasishbasu1009
    @debasishbasu1009 Před 3 lety +5

    Very good judgment by SC

  • @sayyedazharuddin5687
    @sayyedazharuddin5687 Před 3 lety +6

    Good Job sir, aap bahut hi acha kaam kar rahe he ,

  • @hareshjadav8773
    @hareshjadav8773 Před 3 měsíci

    2002से 2014 तक में सुप्रीम कोर्ट का यह निर्णय आया होता तो हमें 900000 रूपये जूर्माना भरना नहीं पडता इसका अफसोस हमें अभी हो रहा है जी ✍️🌹

  • @harihar1232000
    @harihar1232000 Před 3 lety +3

    Really wonderful thanks heartily for exposing the reality of law.

    • @parveengera7729
      @parveengera7729 Před 3 lety

      Law bahut hi complex hota he tum aise kah rahebho Jaise tumhe sab samajh aa gya. .

    • @harishchandragupta3291
      @harishchandragupta3291 Před 2 lety

      Lower court me patni jhoothe income affidevit deti hai, aur lower court kuchh nahi karta, Lower court bina kuchh dekhe sune ektarfa judge ment patni ke paksh me de dete hain

  • @syedshariqashfaq9264
    @syedshariqashfaq9264 Před 2 lety +4

    Very useful and helpful information....you narrated this so nicely

  • @sonukumar-ii7zl
    @sonukumar-ii7zl Před 3 lety +4

    Thks..for updating information...
    Pl...inform us by every update in laws..special related to 498a ,Divorce and maintenance.

  • @BestShayari9
    @BestShayari9 Před 3 lety +3

    Very Nice Video

  • @IrshadKhan-yt4os
    @IrshadKhan-yt4os Před 3 lety +2

    Thanks,,
    Sir apne bahut achchi jankari di hai
    Dil khush ho gaya ..

  • @umeshkumardevangan973
    @umeshkumardevangan973 Před 2 lety

    Many2.thank.u.4.sugetion.

  • @FaisalKhan-rh5xw
    @FaisalKhan-rh5xw Před 2 lety +1

    Thanks sir Ji
    Good information.

  • @s.j.d.b9560
    @s.j.d.b9560 Před 2 lety +1

    Thanks,,,,SUPREME COURT,,,,
    AB GALAT ISTEMAAL KARNA BANDH HO JAAYEGA,,,

  • @gokulchand1489
    @gokulchand1489 Před 2 lety

    Very good
    G C Chauhan Advo

  • @hansrajgera1388
    @hansrajgera1388 Před rokem

    Sir aaj ka Vedic bhut achha lGa thank-you very for this informative vedio

  • @mukeshsen3818
    @mukeshsen3818 Před 2 lety +1

    Thanks

  • @SubhashVishwakarma-tv5ry

    Bahut achi bat hai sir

  • @herohero3600
    @herohero3600 Před 3 lety +14

    good judgment by the supreme court....thanks for giving this latest information 🙏🙏

  • @indratrivedi6524
    @indratrivedi6524 Před rokem

    Bahut acchi jankari Di sar aapane

  • @jaswantsingh-no9rx
    @jaswantsingh-no9rx Před 2 lety

    Very nice Information

  • @rajendrapradhan8346
    @rajendrapradhan8346 Před 2 lety

    Veryverylike

  • @dhillon_everything_is_here

    Your are bestm best

  • @nathabhairathod1416
    @nathabhairathod1416 Před 2 lety +2

    Good Decision by Supreme Court . Good Explanation also.

  • @richasharma488
    @richasharma488 Před 2 lety +2

    Same should go for staying at in-laws and doing household work

  • @NoName-uh2yn
    @NoName-uh2yn Před 3 lety +3

    Law shud not be bias and whoever is found guilty shud be punished.

  • @avanishpandey1
    @avanishpandey1 Před 2 lety +1

    Beautifully presented

  • @rohitdahiya8152
    @rohitdahiya8152 Před 3 lety +17

    जब लडकी को अपने पिता की सम्पत्ति मे अधिकार है। ओर पढी लिखी हैं। तो वह अपना खर्चा तो उठा सकती हैं।

    • @singhharpreet8594
      @singhharpreet8594 Před 3 lety +1

      Bache kiske honge kuch bolne se pehle kuch socho and
      sab ki coñditions ek jesi nahi hoti

    • @ArtiMusafir
      @ArtiMusafir Před 3 lety +3

      Jb ladke ki Gand me dm nhi h or pariwar palne ke layak nhi h to wo shadi se inkar kr sakta h or sanyas le kr chimte bja sakta h kisi ne Gand me danda nhi dala hua h ki shadi kre samjha nalayak h to Apni jindgi me rhe kishi ke gale n latke samjha

    • @rohitdahiya8152
      @rohitdahiya8152 Před 3 lety +1

      @@singhharpreet8594 bache kebal tumhre nhi done ke hote h

    • @singhharpreet8594
      @singhharpreet8594 Před 3 lety

      @@ArtiMusafir 😂😂 ye gyani purush hai or practical life kuch or hoti hai so w8 and watch for his term @rohit dahiya

    • @singhharpreet8594
      @singhharpreet8594 Před 3 lety +1

      @@rohitdahiya8152 toh fir ladki ke maa baap and padhi likhi hone kharcha khud se karne ki nalayak baaten kyu kar rha hai bhai. Shadi ke bad to ladke ko hi jumevvari samjhani chahiye chahe ladki job kre na kre

  • @YogeshParmar-cq7iw
    @YogeshParmar-cq7iw Před 2 lety

    Aap ne bade hi sidhe aur saral tarike se samjaya.
    Es ke liye aap ka dhanyawad. 🙏

  • @rishipradhan3633
    @rishipradhan3633 Před 3 lety +4

    Verdict में जो guidelines दी गई हैं वह भी husband के ऊपर एक और बोझ हैं क्योंकि proof of burden हमेशा husband पर ही रहेगा। कमाती हो या नहीं खर्चा तो देना ही पड़ेगा क्योंकि पत्नी और बच्चे पति की जिम्मेदारी हैं चाहे औलाद नाजायज(किसी और की) ही क्यों न हो। supreme Court का order है। "happy मुकदमेबाज़ी"

    • @bhartichauhan5069
      @bhartichauhan5069 Před 3 lety +1

      Najayaj aulad to pati bhi kitni jagha peda karta hai or Kai Ghar hi supeim court k adaltry kanun banae k Karan toot rahe hain because Kai aadmi or aurat eska galat fayada utha rahe hain jab Tak ye kanun nahi badlega tab Tak Ghar yese hi tootte rahenge.

  • @kparinita6071
    @kparinita6071 Před 2 lety

    Bahut accha order hy sir esse shayad hum logo ko bhi phayada hoga.

  • @rasheeduddina
    @rasheeduddina Před rokem

    assaan bhasha mei bohat achcha samjayei hein👍

  • @krishnasingh1267
    @krishnasingh1267 Před 2 lety +2

    Sir mere divorce ko 2 saal ho gaye hai fir bhi wife ne 125(3) ka case kar diya hai ab kya karna chahiye

  • @vashisthaanshumaan0101
    @vashisthaanshumaan0101 Před 3 lety +2

    Very goodjudgment...

  • @ravimodi9761
    @ravimodi9761 Před 3 lety +2

    aapke explain krne ka tareeka bhut accha hai

  • @mukeshsen3818
    @mukeshsen3818 Před 2 lety +1

    Sir aapka samzane ka tarika bahut accha laga

  • @ravishkant9900
    @ravishkant9900 Před 3 lety +1

    Jai ho ...sumrime court ki... jai ho prabhu ki

  • @shashibalayadav8531
    @shashibalayadav8531 Před 2 lety +5

    यदि पत्नी पति से ज्यादा शिक्षित है तो वो क्यों नहीं नौकरी करती है अपना खर्च चलाने के लिए पति से ही कोर्ट द्वारा गुजारा भत्ता ले रही है और माननीय जज साहब भी पत्नी के पक्ष में आदेश कर चुके हैं जबकि कोर्ट का नियम है पत्नी ज्यादा शिक्षित है पति से तो वो भी कमा सकती है क्या करे इसके लिए

  • @coljaysharma5384
    @coljaysharma5384 Před 3 lety +2

    Very nice judgement by Supreme Court.

  • @sudiptabrahma2631
    @sudiptabrahma2631 Před 3 lety +6

    Good judgement by Hon'ble SC but I want more legal protection in favour of Male. Thanks. Pronam.

  • @surinderpatyal4160
    @surinderpatyal4160 Před 2 lety +1

    Good instructions

  • @chinmoydas3396
    @chinmoydas3396 Před 3 lety +1

    Sab vedio se ek and top vedio hay aapka.very Nice.

  • @shivkumarchoudhary5662

    Thanks sir ji

  • @krishnakanthg176
    @krishnakanthg176 Před 3 lety +2

    Good information from u,
    Good for peedeth pati

  • @s.j.d.b9560
    @s.j.d.b9560 Před 2 lety +2

    DIAVORSE KE CASE BANDH HO JAAYEGA,,,GALAT CASE THOK KE 125 KA USE KARTE THE,,,
    DIAVORSE KE LIYE ITNA DEMAND KARTI HEI KI WOH PAY NAHI KAR SAKTA,,,BAAD MEI 125 KE ZARIYE PER MONTH EARNING KA SAURAS BANATI HEI,,,

  • @jaswantdahiya2150
    @jaswantdahiya2150 Před 2 lety +1

    इनगेज के बाद अगर लडके वाले शादी से इंकार कर दे तो क्या करना चाहिए
    कानुनी सलाह देने का कस्ट करे सर जी

  • @sanjeevrasaily8139
    @sanjeevrasaily8139 Před 2 lety +1

    Nice information.

  • @shaileshpatel2055
    @shaileshpatel2055 Před 2 lety

    Best information sir

  • @marudhara1
    @marudhara1 Před 3 lety +2

    सर जिनका आदेश 2014मे 4000 रुपये माह का हो गया था, क्या इस आदेश से बेरोजगार पति को राहत मिलेगी या नही क्योंकि कर्जा लेकर 7साल से भत्ता दिया जारहा है, नही दे तो हर चार महिने मे अरेस्ट वारंट आ जाता है, भत्ता का आदेश को वकील ने बताया नही था

    • @DescriptiveGyan
      @DescriptiveGyan  Před 3 lety

      Sir , is aadesh se tabhi rahat milegi agar app ki wife earn kar rahi ho or capabile ho 🙏🏻

    • @marudhara1
      @marudhara1 Před 3 lety

      @@DescriptiveGyan दिसम्बर2019 मे एक तरफा तलाक ले चुकी है, MA,BED किया है उसने, कई बार कोटा के जज को प्रार्थना पत्र दिया लेकिन मुझपर फेंक देते थे।

    • @marudhara1
      @marudhara1 Před 2 lety

      सरजी, पत्नी कहीं पर काम करती है, पर मुझे पता नही चलसका है अभी तक, क्या पत्नी झूठा शपथपत्र दे सकती है हाईकोर्ट मे।

  • @rajendrabhuyan1870
    @rajendrabhuyan1870 Před 3 lety +1

    Thanks for sharing information

  • @alokgiri1224
    @alokgiri1224 Před 2 lety +1

    Meri wife ki earning 50 thousands se zada he fir bhe uske court me false statement dya he, mene proof bhe dye fir bhe court ne 6 thousand rupees interim mentinence start kr dee, :) 😀.

  • @radhey_-tf6dn
    @radhey_-tf6dn Před 10 měsíci

    Kya lower court s c ke guidelines na mane ya aanshik hi mane to kya karna padega. Aapke samjhane ka tarika bahut achcha hai. Pl ho sake to jankari de de.

  • @indramanibehera3116
    @indramanibehera3116 Před 3 lety +2

    Thank you very much sir have a good day sir may God bless you sir app ka bahut achha vdo hai sir so many many thanks sir all the best sir aur aisa achha vdo banaye sir jaise log ko jyada se jyada pasand aayega sir good bye sir i like it very much sir

  • @ashishdhir6415
    @ashishdhir6415 Před 2 lety

    Very nice

  • @skynet_cyberdyne_systems

    good work

  • @mylapallichandrasekhararao4025

    Wonderful explanation.

  • @svengineering7918
    @svengineering7918 Před 2 lety

    Nice information

  • @gulabgang3716
    @gulabgang3716 Před 3 lety +4

    उसे गुज़ारा भत्ता मिलेगा, पढ़ी लिखी हो और जॉब ना करती हो तब भी। क्यूंकि पहले वो मारपीट और दहेज का झूठा केस डालेगी फिर कोर्ट गुज़ारा भत्ता मांगेगी और कोर्ट डिसीजन देने तक उसे इंटर्म गुज़ारा भत्ता दिलवा देगा।
    कोर्ट ये नहीं देखेगा की उसने झूठे आरोप लगाए है और वो कमाने लायक है

    • @musicwithgautam4104
      @musicwithgautam4104 Před 2 lety

      Aapko shayd pta nhi hai ki dv aur 125 case file krte smay saare medical reports saare proofs dene hote hain tab jaake case file hota hai

    • @gulabgang3716
      @gulabgang3716 Před 2 lety

      @@musicwithgautam4104 Apko shayad pata nahi hai ki meri dusht wife ne 125 ki petition bina kisi evidence ke hi file kiya hai last year

  • @Ashwani.85vlog
    @Ashwani.85vlog Před 2 lety +1

    Is topic ka Judgement / Guaidlines bhi share kare

  • @pvskumar3296
    @pvskumar3296 Před 2 lety

    Good

  • @adityapathak3508
    @adityapathak3508 Před 2 lety

    Nice guiding

  • @ashishkhare7794
    @ashishkhare7794 Před 3 lety +1

    thanks for the video

  • @munawwarchougule3493
    @munawwarchougule3493 Před 2 lety

    Thanks sir for nice information

  • @vikramchand7205
    @vikramchand7205 Před 3 lety +2

    Thx,,,,,I will get justice thx SC

  • @priteshchouhan9277
    @priteshchouhan9277 Před 3 lety +2

    Sir
    Section 125 me patni ko kharcha de ki bajaye uska monthly rashan de sakte hai ya paise dena jaruri hai???????
    Gehu,chabal,dal and others things

  • @adityaunlocked8379
    @adityaunlocked8379 Před 3 lety +2

    Bhai kya ghazzaab explain kiya aapne...dil khush ho gaya aur subscribe kar liya...bas ek request hai... wordss ko thoda English me bhi bata diya kijiye...lyk gujara bhatta ko maintenance etc etc

    • @DescriptiveGyan
      @DescriptiveGyan  Před 3 lety +1

      Thank you sir , and i will use both hindi and English terms in future videos 🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻

  • @rajendranarayanjaiswal8573

    Wife salary is 40% more then husband, and does not have any child, will she is entitled to get interim maintenance.

  • @cpsingh7987
    @cpsingh7987 Před 3 lety +2

    Good information but not followed bylower court

  • @kandaridhanbir4962
    @kandaridhanbir4962 Před 3 lety +4

    Vry gud decision on d basis of economic back ground

  • @apnanayasafar
    @apnanayasafar Před 3 lety

    Very nice Judgment judicial order

  • @mayuriejyotish8322
    @mayuriejyotish8322 Před 2 lety

    Very very good decision of hon'ble supreme court.

  • @vikrammehta622
    @vikrammehta622 Před 3 lety +1

    Great

  • @VinodKumar-wg2dd
    @VinodKumar-wg2dd Před 2 lety

    लेकिन यह हकीकत नहीं है सब झूठ है,ऐसा नहीं होता है आज की तारीख में ,अगर होता है तो बताओ मुझे आप

  • @gurmindersingh5520
    @gurmindersingh5520 Před 3 lety +2

    In this vidoe it is mentioned that Status of wife's parent will also be considered. But this is not mentioned in judgement PDF. Pls clarify

    • @DescriptiveGyan
      @DescriptiveGyan  Před 3 lety

      Sir , it means that the living standard of wife not parents property not there assets , but if she take it from its parents like property , then it will consider ,
      Regards 🙏

  • @prakashkamble2186
    @prakashkamble2186 Před rokem

    Very very nice vedio

  • @dreddy7419
    @dreddy7419 Před 3 lety +2

    Hello ,
    I got married 6 months ago.. and got seperated 4 months ago..only two months of marital life.
    She filed 498A case.. police filed chargsheet ..seems they are going for DVC and maintainance case.
    My salary is 1.5lakh per month and I have a home loan and other loans close to 50k.
    She is having business but I'm not sure about her income and it is very difficult to get her income details.
    She is a b.tech graduate.
    In this case how much court can grant maintaianance????

    • @DescriptiveGyan
      @DescriptiveGyan  Před 3 lety

      Sir it will decide by the court on circumstances , but as per your salary it may approx 25000 . 🙏

    • @dreddy7419
      @dreddy7419 Před 3 lety

      @@DescriptiveGyan I heard that court will tell wife to search job in one year of age is professionally qualified . That means we dnt need to pay maintenance after one year ??.is it true ?.she is a btech graduate and she is 30years old girl

    • @sarojkantaswain7816
      @sarojkantaswain7816 Před 2 lety

      You are sole responsible because you couldn't give equal status to your wife as give to your mother and sister.so now you can't give any explanation before folish rules and zealous society. Paisa kamane wale vakil aur inexperienced judgement may not bring happiness in your life.

    • @sarojkantaswain7816
      @sarojkantaswain7816 Před 2 lety

      You never went to live with her at her father's house rather you brought her to your house;here you are sole person to maintain her.Quesrion doesn't arise whatever her qualification or earned,it all not to be taken into account because she left all of her life so to find all love affection,and also your responsibility to share and provide all her linving aid,but you failed.So reject such inhuman verdit for which this sdv opened a channel for income.but I think it's a particular verdict on a particular case by honble court.