Can a Bullet Go Through Another Bullet? 875,000FPS - The Slow Mo Guys
Vložit
- čas přidán 2. 05. 2024
- Gav and Dan test the limits of millimetre-specific precision by trying to shoot through a large bullet with a smaller one while taking hundreds of thousands of pictures every second.
Instagram - / theslowmoguys
Tik Tok - / theslowmoguys
Can a Bullet Go Through Another Bullet? 875,000FPS - The Slow Mo Guys - Zábava
I'm sad about how Dan in his first shot, shoots a bullet on a NAIL, asks if he... "nailed" the shot and no one notices the pun
I don't think Gav or Dan noticed it either XD
A great pun is like a fine wine. It needs some time to age before its perfection can be appreciated.
Hammertime
timestamp?
3:09 @@Thefuryspeed100
Dan honking the bulb of his nose when trying to make fun of the “well actually” people, while wearing actual glasses, is definitely peak Dan.
it probably won't catch on, but that should be a meme :)
@@vannustube well actually
:D
“honking the bulb”
Guys, fantastic results. But you can get 30 cal. FMJ rounds or "solids" pretty easily...go for it.
@@E-GlideYou meant to comment this as a standalone, but you accidentally made it a reply to a thread about Dan's nose... 😏
I'm so glad that Gav says "visual effects department" instead of "animators" like most people do. I know it's because he has experience working on films, but still, it's nice when the correct artists are mentioned.
The animators of the visual effects department?
@@hipserWell thats what OP mentioned
@@thetruthexperimentstimulating a bullet hit would most likely be… the FX department within VFX, not the animators
@jesssoderberg3411 My ex wife stimulated me all the time and she wasn't part of VFX or nothing
Considering that cgi is actually animation of wouldn't be incorrect though animators is more specific and not limited to live action movie crew in Hollywood
I'd love to see this with an actual 5.7 round, but having to sell the high speed camera to buy the ammo might be counter productive
It's pretty lame how they don't even mention that they have to come all the way to the U.S. to make firearm videos because of the terrible gun laws in the UK.
@@stopthephilosophicalzombie9017 "terrible gun laws in the UK" lmao seethe ameritard
@@stopthephilosophicalzombie9017 Gav has lived in the US for years at this point, Dan comes to visit and they do a ton of videos together then slowly release them. Been this way for a minute now... They aren't coming here just to do these videos, but yes it definitely makes it much easier! Not every video including guns needs to get political, sometimes we can just enjoy cool stuff!
Exactly what I thought too not a .22
Why would they sell the camera for ammo that sells for less than a dollar a round?
the level of CONSISTENCY with this channel getting mind blowing results is really a treasure
It makes me wonder how many ideas they have that they film and just decide it’s not worth a video. Like, absolute duds that are cool in theory but just look boring.
All it takes is 1000 tries to get 3-5 great slow mo vids to post.
"do you fancy a subtle escalation?"
not even sure why, but that phrase cracked me up good 🤣
British flirting
I liked what they followed that up with:
- Does that even fit in the hole? I guess the tip will.
- The tip will, and that's all you really need to get in, the tip.
And the answer will always be yes.
I laughed too. If Dan's version of 'subtle escalation' is going from a .22LR to a 30-06, I'd hate to see what he produces when he shouts, "OH IT'S ON MATE!" 🤣
The British per chance for understatement
I actually have a feeling that a FMJ .223 would actually go through the middle. This was a SUPER-cool video, thanks, fellas!
My vote would be 17 rem ...
@@richardsolberg4047 Can you get FMJ .17 projectiles? I think that would be the key. Or for that matter like a brass solid.
That or 5.7, which is a pistol round
@@keisisqrl Maybe, particularly fired from like a carbine. I assume they make 5.7x28 carbines, right?
Came to say 17 hmr but…..
I love the slow mo as much as the next guy but I think what’s kept me watching this channel over the years is the absolute professionalism of these two. They know what they’re doing and they do it right.
17:00 Two complete professionals, indeed! LOL But yes, I agree with you!
Aye. So good, they can do it right and still have fun
Dan isn’t even holding the gun and his trick shot accuracy is still insane
Dan's former military so he's not exactly a firearms novice.
He did well, but it’s not some crazy accomplishment. Bore sighting is fairly common and pretty accurate even 50 yards out.
@@That0Homeless0Guy Explosive expert no?
@@Elmithian - Why would you need to be an "explosive expert"? No need to be overly impressed by something mundane.
@@Beeti1 When he was in the military his specialty was handling and using explosives. That was simply what I was saying?
I am not sure what bug crawled up yer ear today for you to be this ready to be dismissive and negative, but I hope you feel better soon.
"The tip will. And that's all you really need to get in, is the tip."
- Dan 2024
Most aggressive docking ever attempted. 👉👈
The amount of sunburn that dan progressively gets in this video is hilarious.
You guys unknowingly went the myth busters route, you tested the myth but then recreated the results. That’s what we need to see!! Great job.
Absolutely the best part. The "ok, but what does it take to make it look like that" escalation is very mythbusters.
0:48 since you guys pointed out it’s much more pointy, it looks much more like a 5.7mm round fired from the p90 smg or the five-seven pistol
I came here to say this. That's not a .22 in the original cilp. The 5.7 is pointy, fast, and made to penetrate, so that would make much more sense.
A 5.7 is basically a 22 caliber bullet. .22 cal is 5.6mm. It was probably a .22 cal bullet but not a 22 lr.
Guess more of a reason to revisit this 😂
@@erichl1167 Yeah, the point where Dan's joking "It's the composition of the bullets" is actually the real answer, since 5.7 is designed as an armor piercing round, like, as just the normal bullet.
I would like to see this revisited with a 22 WMR, a 22 TCM, and a 5.7 X 28
I love that the energy of these videos hasn't changed a bit since the early days. It's just a pair of friends having fun while showing us cool slow mo stuff.
I like that they don't seem to torture Dan as much anymore. The channel has definitely matured, but still kept that core feeling of two buddies with boundless curiosity.
I'm surprised that i stayed to watch the whole thing.
Taofledermaus is still exactly the same also.
@@stopthephilosophicalzombie9017 DUUUUUUUDE I FORGOT ABOUT HIM! I FOUND HIM THROUGH HIS MERCURY BALLOON VIDEO!
gav is spot on with the brass case speculation. the brass fireforms to the chamber and pressure increases inside the case and compresses the gunpowder which is necessary for a complete deflagration of the powder
Here's an idea for the next video and a solution to the messed up table. Take an electric sander (or maybe just regular sand paper if it's easier) and sand off all the uneven holes. Probably won't get rid of them completely but would definitely make them smaller. Then record the movement of the sander across the table, showing all the little wood particles getting obliterated. If it’s too difficult to film then at least use the sander on smaller things
I'm convinced that Dan has a superpower. Anything he tries to do in front of a slow-mo camera, he nails it first try.
It's called the magic of editing
@@thematt6705I don't think so. Gav includes the fails if they happen before the successful shots.
"All you need to get in is the tip" I respect the self control it took to not crack up at that!
Dirty Mind...
Hence the cut after 🤣🤣
Lol take my like you deserve it I didn't even think about that. That made me day.
that tip applies to real world situations ( ͡ಠ ͜ʖ ͡ಠ)
Dan has crazy precision when it comes to guns. In all of their videos that involves firearms, his skills are always the upmost impressive.
14:17 This shot was the most incredible to me. Just the satisfying way the shrapnel blooms out in an almost perfect sphere. Very satisfying
A steel core 5.56 would be incredibly fascinating to see. Guarantee it would go clean through
Honestly, just for the extremity of it I would love to see what a 220 swift would do. They use the same 55gr or other applicable bullet from a 5.56mm with a much larger powder charge. 2300f/s is an acceptable average for a 5.56x45 cartridge from a decent barrel length, whereas the 220 swift gets the same projectile to 4000f/s.
I accidentally hit a ½in thick 4in dia. AR500 gong with my 220 using a 55gr soft tip at too close a range when a wind gust blew it into my shot path as I fired. At 50 yards it blew a ¾ hole through the gong with sheer velocity alone.
This is what I thought I figure there has to be steel bullets out there not soft metal bullets and that's what they need
Also it was not film accurate either in the film The bullet shattered like it was made of glass it was brittle it broke into clean distinct pieces well yours well you described it right it turned into liquid :-)
@@Colonel_Overkill 220 swift would be pretty fascinating. I wonder if you could load a 220 swift with a steel core.
@@nerys71 Not liquid, but clay.
Because that's exactly how clay acts when it splashes against something at high speed.
In fact, lead and clay have many common properties.
@RealCadde you kind of miss my point dude you missed it by a long shot The movie scene was shattered Glass whatever you call this I don't care what you call it you can call it pink polka dot send me a liquid amorphous fluid action if you want it wasn't what was in the movie
I feel like you guys are 3 videos away from smashing atoms:
1. Shoot a nail into another nail
2. Shoot a pin into a pin
3. Shoot a Higgs Boson into a Higgs Boson.
They should go to the LHC next time. They aren't using it for anything productive anyway. Particle physics has lost its way.
And SOMEHOW Dan would be avle to get those shots.
10:09 just a tank casually driving past
that's how we do things in Texas 🤣😂
i love how they’re always safe and responsible about things :)
Five-seven would be the perfect ammunition for piercing another bullet. It has a lot more propellant, is a tiny round, and most of the rounds have a pointy tip meant to pierce body armor.
Did anyone ever make a varminter type rifle for 5.7? Seemed like a cool cartridge when I played with it 15 years ago
Exactly my thought
@@The_Angry_Medic Depends on what you consider to be a varmint rifle. For a bolt-action, "traditional" varmint rifle, the only one I'm aware of is the Savage Model 25, but it is long discontinued in that chambering, and probably very difficult to find one. But if you go with a compact semiauto, there's a few choices. Of course there's the FN PS90, but there's also the Ruger LC Carbine that is much less expensive.
Edit: The Savage 25 in 5.7x28mm may not have actually entered production. Some say it did, some say it didn't. Even if it did, it would likely be exceedingly rare and basically impossible to find.
That was my first thought and what I was hoping for.
That's round in the movie
I'm so glad to see new episodes of Mythbusters after all these years
I totally had the thought "mythbusters, the next generation" somewhere half way through this video
This isn’t mythbusters, it’s the slowmo guys
@@tacosalad5825 The joke went right over your head.
@@tacosalad5825they're kind of a spiritual sucessor to Mythbusters at this point.
this one made me laugh so hard:D
Dan is so fun and goofy it's easy to forget how skilled he is with firearms. What a shot that first try. Gav didn't believe it would land first try.
Can we just take a second to appreciate Dan's aim? Insane.
17:05 This imitation of him saying “Smaller bullets.” was 11/10, I couldn’t stop rewatching it 😂
"Shmoller boolits"
This whole “Did movies do it right?” has to be one of my favourite things on the internet
Imagine how much cheaper the scene would have been if they actually did it.
Mythbusters would have had a field day with a high speed camera.
Dan's 'Im on the internet and I know everything' acting had me wheezing like a kettle 🤣🤣🤣
Re: appearance of being liquid. Shooting the standing part of a railroad rail, about 1/2 inch thick steel, the hole was about double the diameter of the bullet, and the inside of the hole had the appearance of being melted and immediately returned to solid. Its color was a dark shade of bluish gray, presumably iron oxide. That was with a .270 Weatherby, a 100 grain bullet at about 3800 feet/second. If you decide to have another go, I suggest keeping the .22 caliber that fits the hollow-point so well, and fire it from a .22-250 or other really hot .22's that can exceed 4000 feet/second. Since you have a .30-06, if you can find some Remington Accelerator ammunition with sabots and .22 bullets, that will get you much more velocity than any ordinary ammunition. That is how they get extremely high velocity with the main gun on our M-1 Abrams tanks, but the projectiles for that are somewhat larger than .22 :-)
Someone is definitely gonna show this to Gunn and there’s a good chance he’ll answer their questions about how they got the correct effect and thank them for their kind words.
Probably Corridor
The movie looks nothing like the real deal. The lead doesn't look liquid at all in the movie, the tip doesn't ignite, it just looks worse.
I got here after he posted it on his Twitter
He did today actually😂
For anyone trying to find James Gunn's comments on this in the future, it's actually from his threads post, not Twitter
The way Gave says "I've had second thoughts." made me laugh so hard. 🤣😂🤣😂
You guys are awesome... Glad that there are channels like yours, opens up an unseen world to the public.
Whilst viewing your vids my mind tends to wander thinking about everyday things, and what they might look like were they to be viewed from the perspective of your cameras' lens. Your vids are truly candy for ones' thoughts. For what it is worth...thankyou for all of the thought provoking content that you put out. You two are truly masters of your craft!
The shockwave across the brass till it blows up is just amazing to watch. 10:15
I guess it hit the back of the bullet. It went through the primer and powder like nothing, not even deforming the shell, and then just sprayed in all directions..
Would love to see this stunt done using some small but fast bullet made of tungsten or something like that..
@@janhofmann3499
17 hmr with fmj maybe? I can't find any other pointy small bullets.
Its especially cool to see on higher definition screens. Would be even better if YT offered 120Hz playback.
Did the powder ignite/explode or just disperse?
Best time is when its new vid Slow Mo time. I did a paper on you guys in school on how you have fundamentally changed the way most people think about perceived moments in time. The whole class was stoked to hear about the great Gav and Dan. Thanks for the great content for more than 14 years, which is some googol number of microseconds of footage presented, at least.
You are vastly underestimating the size of a googol. If the age of the universe is about 15 billion years old, then there have only been about 4.73×10^17 seconds. So even if you had a camera that shot at 10^80 frames per second, you're still short of a googol.
@@TangoWolf09 nerd
Very cool!
@@crackysr2961Retard
@@crackysr2961 If you're watching the slo-mo guys, there's a high likelihood that you're a nerd
Easily one of my favorite episodes. Awesome.
It was incredibly satisfying to see you follow through with perfecting each shot. The results were worth it.
The original bullet looks less like a .22 and more like a .223 rifle bullet, but honestly looks even smaller. They may have used a .17 Winchester Super Magnum or .17 Hornady Magnum bullet, which is narrow and long and pointed, and looks about in scale. And it looks like a solid steel bolt, not copper jacketed lead, which would allow it to penetrate the other bullet and emerge intact.
yes. This. solid steel vs FMJ.
Likely a 5.7
i was thinking .17 HMR
Exactly. I have a Savage .17 HMR (with a gorgeous green stock), and it looks just like the original shot, except most of my rounds have a plastic insert at the tip. I have seen a .22 Magnum round that has a solid point. I'm with you here on the .17 HMR.
The 5.7 is slightly bigger than a .22 LR, and this round looked slightly smaller.
Yeah true would be fun to see them do it again with something small & fast like 17 or 5.7
"Better small and hard than big and soft" would have been a perfect line. Thanks for these obliterating and mesmerizing shots !
Great video to understand Momentum!!!!!! Thanks!!!
I'm sure someone has already said this, but just in case. If you can get a bullet proof vest, new or used, and place it behind the target, you should be able to catch the target and the bullet you have fired. This is something @Taofledermaus does in his slow motion videos. Perhaps if you used the 5.7mm ammo the round might make it through the .50 AE bullet.
Props to Dan, his aiming was spot on. Even using a jig, he basically bullseye’s the bullet first attempt.
Had some bread in a toaster. 4:02 countdown comes, and the toaster decides to be ready at the exact fraction of a second Dan finishes countdown and fires the gun. You know how everyone has tried to count their own toaster down? Well, just wanted to tell you these guys nailed in with a video.
The most satisfying feeling in the universe
@@z_montyYes - the circle is complete 😊
Dan is shockingly accurate.
The shock wave moving though the casing is wild!
I don't know if it's a shock wave vs. the actual bullet mass forcing the case to crumple.
First, it was a great and enjoyable video. I have handloaded ammunition for decades so here's a little more perspective.
There are a lot of variables that are not addressed here. The bullet in the original video is from a centerfire cartridge, probably a 5.7mm although there are .224/5.56mm bullets of that shape. The bullet is of either a full metal jacket or armor penetrating design and is traveling at 2 to 3 times the speed of the .22 rimfire bullet. The rimfire bullet is made of very soft lead and is .001"-.002" (.025 - .050 mm) smaller diameter than a .22 caliber centerfire bullet. The rimfire bullet is also significantly lighter and thus has far less energy. The .30-'06 bullets you used are of a soft point design, intended to expand on impact much like the hollow point .50 cal bullet so it was no surprise that they broke up. Any full metal jacket bullet and especially one of a diameter closer to 5.7mm would have likely made it completely through the base of the jacket of the .50 cal bullet. A "green tip" 5.56 NATO round has a steel core and would be a likely candidate to make it through the .50 cal more-or-less intact. A monolithic copper alloy bullet of 5.56 - 6.5 mm with a solid closed point would have been an excellent choice to prove the concept as well.
It's very unlikely that shooting a loaded cartridge is going to result in much of a bang. Once the brass cartridge is broken open or the bullet is dislodged there is nothing to contain the pressure. Containing the pressure while the powder burns is what raises the pressure and makes the loud report of gunfire. I found a live rifle round at the range one day and set it up on the 100 yard target stand. When I shot it with another centerfire rifle, there wasn't even much of a flash. Some of the unburned powder was still in the cartridge when I recovered it.
Dans accuracy is insane. He nailed it every shot. Practically perfect each time.
He aimed down the barrel of a fixed gun. It's not exactly rocket science.
Ever heard of a laser bore sight? Also, it's like two feet away, kinda hard to miss when you're that close.
@@thematt6705He eyeballed it.
The most impressive parts of these videos is that Gav does all the sound designing
Love this well-done and some great footage. Yep, you truly "Nailed it".
Dan's shooting ability will never fail to amaze me
Shout out to the real MVP, the Blu Tack.
It’s videos like these that make me think of the 10k fps mug breaking video, and how far you guys and technology has come. We used to think a slow motion video of a tea mug breaking was cool and now you are casually filming a bullet in slow motion with crazy detail.
This has to be one of my favorites. This was a great episode.
I really thought they were going to go to a 22 magnum after the the 22. They jumped way up. Amazing to see these results!
I like how scalable a shot into the primer looks. Just the right lighting, some paint and it will be a nice miniature of a blowing space ship in style of 70’s movies.
Reminds me of some Anime spaceship explosions.
10:23 i absolutely LOVE how you can see the shockwave travel through the brass as the powder ignites inside the cartridge
Absolutely phenomenal accuracy and HD footage. This is one of the best episodes to date. Excellent!
When they were talking of higher velocity than the .22LR I was hoping for .223 but they used 30-06 instead.
Could have even used green tip 5.56.
I would have liked to have seen that.
Absolutely excellent footage! Keep it up guys!
Damn, the talent of both Gav and Dan is fully on display in this video. Great shots, in both senses.
👍🫡
Easily one of my favorite videos from you guys I've seen.
The smaller rifle bullet is still flying about 2000fps faster than the fat one, even if both were fired from their respective guns.
The biggest factor, as you mentioned, would be the construction and material composition of the bullets.
Movie seems quite plausible. BRILLIANT video Guys, Excellent!!!
Really impressed by how perfectly you managed to thread that .22 down the hollowpoint every time.
It's all in the editing. Movies are made with thousands of takes and hours of film. The final film is an edit of all of it. That's why it takes years to make a movie.
"That's all you need to get in is the tip" 😂
thats what she said
@@milire2668 lol
13:41 "I wish I had a bit more depth". (Don't we all, mate)
"the hole is so much bigger"
@@peterford5408 lmao
I love that you guys are still at it
Pretty wild! Great video guys!
I can't speak for every movie studio, but a client of mine was one of the major ones. They simulate what happens using CGI and material properties are assigned to objects to get the 'physics' outcome. They simulate the same thing hundreds of thousands of times (Which takes literally 1 minute) until they get a 'true' movement. Not sure if they did the same in this movie, but I know that's how one of the big ones do it.
They probably simulated it, but used too low a ductility for the lead. In the movie it shatters in a brittle fashion, like silicon, or I guess very chilled lead. If they'd done the same experiment as these guys they would have animated it better.
So they running FEA/CFD simulations?
B/c I've always wondered how well a CGI rig can do with FEA/CFD. Running a physics package optimized for gfx chip processing would probably run pretty damn well. (Some still favor CPU core count which thrive on hardware like and thread ripper whereas others love to run on gfx cores)
Not all CGI is a physics sim. Sims are generally used when you have too many things to animate by hand, like particles of snow or the objects that make up an exploding building. Sims cost more to develop and run, but there's a breakeven point when you have a lot of stuff interacting with other stuff. When you only have two objects, it's often not worth developing a sim for it if you can semi-automatically animate everything with some simpler math.
@@concinnus True, but you also have to remember that in the movie the other bullet is travelling as well, near effectively doubling the collision strength, which could potentially make the lead appear more brittle with more power being sent through it.
0:48 the round looks way closer to a 5.7 then a .22lr
Came here to say this
Same thinking here
Exactly what I was thinking. A subsonic .22 wouldn't do much- but a supersonic 5.7 AP (designed for high pen.) I could see doing it at a small distance
or a 17 hmr. looked like steel penetrator tbh
Same, they should have used 5.7. Also looks alot like 5.45
You guys should film an ejection seats operation if that's at all possible. Like how the canopy explosively separates and all the stages. Love you guys!!
For greater speed and power while maintaining a similar caliber size, consider using a .223 Remington or 5.56x45mm NATO round instead of a .22 Long Rifle. Both rounds offer a significant increase in velocity and are commonly used in rifles like the AR-15. They provide superior performance due to their centerfire design, compared to the rimfire .22 LR.
There's a civil war account of a confederate soldier getting shot in the back of the leg and they assumed it bounced off the bone turning 90 degrees and then exited the side of the leg. They cut the leg off but the surgeon did an autopsy and found it was actually two separate bullets that entered his leg, collided and wrapped around each other stopping dead inside his leg. Crazy story. The probabilities are insane.
I’m just as impressed with the bore sighting, as I am the footage. Well done guys.
One of their best videos!
DEAD-ON!!! Great shot. I would have never thought that any bullet would come out that wonky!!
“Does that even fit in the hole? I guess the tip will. The tip will and that’s all you really need to get in is the tip” that’s what she said.
12:25
Another good way to test this would be to swap the bullets round.
From a physics perspective, there's almost no difference between an object hitting the bullet and the bullet hitting an object.
So, why not use some kind of accurately sized but extra long tool steel spike to simulate the small bullet, mount it on a surface and shoot it with the big bullet.
Physics might object this theory when we look at muzzle speeds of the two different calibres… you agree?
@SmilingDevil yeah, that's why I said "almost", but we're already keeping one stationary, so in the grand scheme I don't think it really matters
I thought they needed a backplate for the stationary bullet. A trade-off for the GLARING difference in energy. speed > mass
Or if you can somehow fix the stationary bullet in place by...welding it to the nail or fixing it in the vice or something...idunno
@declanwilcock7061 welding would be tricky with it being lead and copper and a vice would stopmit exploding properly
Plus, the main issue is that the smaller bullet is too slow and too soft, instead of punching through, it just mushes into the bigger bullet
14:50 lmao "props" to the fx department is an excellent (if unintentional) pun
Another cracking video both!
Don't forget the power of a Sacrificial Mirror for capturing footage from the danger zone!
You could even put a mirror behind bulletproof glass to see just how much damage would get past the glass, and how much the damaged glass would interfere with the image.
Would actually be neat to see the footage carry on until the mirror gets hit too
4:20 the Blu Tack getting stretched into a ring around the nail from the force of impact.
Dan earned that sunburn!
The 22 shot into the 50AE reminded me of the theory of the big bang when a planet slammed into the earth that created the planet that we live on. it's called a case for a reason. All the case dose is hold all components to gather, without the chamber of the barrel the bullet wouldn't go any where. You need the chamber to create the pressure in the case to push the bullet down barrel. Very cool video.
What a great video.
Dan's accuracy was so good and Gav was able to perfectly capture the moment of impact.
One scene that I would like to see but doubt it would ever be tested because of the danger is from the Red movie.
The scene where John Malkovich's character shoots the tip of an RPG, flying towards him, with a bullet causing it to explode.
Mythbusters did that one. Season 9, Episode 13.
@@andrewpredmore2968 Oh really?! I'll to look up that episode later. Thanks for the info.
I must say props to the visual effects department that they managed to get it really right.
But this shows, practical effects are still cooler looking than CGI despite how far visual effects have come.
Massiv respect of Dan nailing the bullets.
The cgi team could definitely make it look identical to the real life footage but it's all up the the vfx supervisor and director to decide how it looks, aritistc look over realism
Nah it still looks cooler in the film as you’ve got the bullet carrying on through the other one. Plus it would be impossible to film without CGI
Practical FX hold up better over time too, at least IMO. So many times old practical effects look old, but old CGI just looks bad.
@@Lizlodude I think we've reached a point now where the best CGI nowadays will always look good
Good cgi is cgi that you don't notice
Holy smokes! That's awesome as always guys!
this is my new favourite slow mo guys vid
14:50 sorry Gav... Props don't go to Visual Effects department. Props go to the propmaster. Thank you.
I have watched quite a few videos of things getting shot and there was always people saying the target object needs to be anchored more securely. This has proven to me that it all happens so fast that the anchoring isn't that important. I was surprised how the .22 caliber bullet was flying tail down especially so close to the rifle. You guys never disappoint and the camera technology is unbelievable!
Love this one
Sometimes the projectile does not stabilize when it leaves the barrel. Particularly with the small .22LR . Sometimes the bullet does not grip the rifling. This can be caused by the condition of the barrel. Rusty, pitted, groves clogged, wear and tear on the barrel.
When you switched to the larger caliber ammunition you were using a hollow point and a soft point rifle bullet. Both perform in exactly the same way. Both designed to expand and produce a larger hole in the target. So when you hit using this combination you get exactly what you see in your slow motion shot. Both expanding extremely quickly and dumping all of the kinetic energy into to heat. Giving you a look at semi molten lead.
Now in the movie you showed, the X bullet was smaller yes, but it's extremely pointed. And was a different color, looked like steel? Or maybe something else? But then you run into the bullet not gripping the rifling. This can be solved by the addition of a copper base cap on the bullet. They make them for softer lead bullets that don't reliably grip the rifling, they just tear through the barrel and upon leaving the barrel they start to keyhole, or flying sideways, or any which way it wants. But the bullets would have to be machined on a lathe to fit perfectly in the rifling like a howitzer round. Then you'd have to add the copper base cap on the bullet. Not impossible but expensive.
On the topic of caseless ammunition.
It never got any traction in the military. They found that continuous firing heated up the chamber to the point it caused a "cookoff", firing the round without the trigger being pulled.
This is an obvious safety risk.
That sounds terrifying
Dont forget that ammo storage was a secondary issue as well (i remember hearing about humidity causing problems with long term storage)
Cook offs can occur with standard ammunition also.
0:09 Exactly what I thought when I saw the thumbnail: The good Suicide Squad!
more like the less bad
@@arthaiser yeah, less bad, because it was good
It's tricky, the difference being a pronoun that's commonly dropped! 1935, 2016, or 2021!
There was a good one? When?
@@arthaiser??
That looks so good! And the extremely high FPS just make it look so much more amazing
ABSOLUTELY SPEECHLESS, BRAVO !⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️🎯
The fact that Dan can recognize the difference in the height of the nail being hammered down a fraction of an inch by sighting the gun is just insane
12:25 “Does that even fit in the hole”
“The tip will, that’s all you need to get in, the tip”
@8:00 I mean the projectiles would go through each other if, and never the casing because the casing gets ejected when you fire it. it's pointless, unless you're trying to shoot down the barrel of a gun, and hit the round that is chambered. this entire video is pure art though guys, i love it!
You guys should try giving this a shot with the 5.7x28 cartridge! It would probably get the right balance of movie accuracy and real world performance.
I think if you want the 22 to go through the .50 cal you need to use a much harder bullet like a brass solid (also the bullet from the movie looks more like a 5.7×28 mm than a 22 lr)
Its some sci fi weapon in the movie, comics logic, no need to apply logic to that.
@@assasin19991999it's a Derringer in the movie, not his sci-fi one, if I remember correctly