Thermonuclear weapons are the only thing which prevents full scale WWIII. Nuclear deterence is a real thing that works, lets hope that it countinues to work as intended.
India and Pakistan had the ability to produce nuclear weapons in the 60's. It was not until late 90's that they engaged in a nuclear arms race. Both countries had operational nuclear reactors running in 60's.
Ядерное оружие является очень хорошим аргументом сдерживания. К слову та же Северная Корея сейчас себя чувствует намного лучше как раз за счёт Ядерного оружия и поддержки России. Поверь мне без этого оружия Пхеньян себя чувствовал намного сложнее особенно когда часто проводились военные учения между Америкой и Южной Кореей тогда часто самолёты этих стран практически заходили на территорию Северной Кореи и пытались спровоцировать на ответ и это могло сработать во первых радары явно не могли точно показать в нужное время что самолёты не долетели и развернулись, а во вторых Пхеньян вот он, до него рукой подать, а там сотни самых важных людей страны находится. Думаю объяснять что Южная Корея перестала подобным заниматься из-за появления Ядерного оружия у Северной Кореи, думаю не стоит, сам поймёшь 😊
Quantity comparison with nuke overkills is like two guys counting their matches with one having 2 and the other one having 5 on the hand - and a bathub full of petrol between them.
I remember the height of the Arms Race and the end of it. The Arms Race was TERRIFYING. We’re still feeling the effects today. I don’t think people realize how deeply that conflict scarred the world. I genuinely cannot stand Reagan. However, his decision to up the ante with space-based defense was absolutely the hole in the dike of the Iron Wall. With that shift, we only need about 25% of our full arsenal to glass every Russian urban center and defense sector. And it can happen before 50% of anything Russia launches, gets here. That would be absolutely awful. But as Sting sang, “There’s no such thing as a winnable war. It’s a lie we don’t believe any more… Believe me when I say to you, I hope the Russians love their children, too.”
Его нет ! Его убили русские . Русским вообще нельзя доверять власть . Горбачев развалил страну . Ельцин пропил и продал страну. Путин добивает и распродаёт то что осталось от них . А народу дал ложный патриотизм того , чего уже давно нет . Живут прошлым и думают о прошлом .
But, doesn't the present us have enough men,real men to fight a long bloody war ? I don't think so, and men win wars.any doubt, sissies?😂😂btw, Ukraine is fighting a proxy war for the US now, and that's how it's gonna become,that's until others get it,and that is, the US doesn't have real men anymore!!Men without balls don't win wars!!😂😂
Exactly. Look how accurate U.S. intelligence was for Iraq. My thoughts are no nation will ever know exactly how many nukes other countries may have no matter how high tech their intelligence may be... .. not even a ball park figure.
@@thelocallocksmithcompany-t9164 são estimativas com base em análises de documentos. Todos sabíamos a e os Estados Unidos estava mentindo sobre o Iraque, como em quase todas suas guerras.
In 1960, the Kennedy campaign tried to claim that Eisenhower had allowed the USSR to leap frog the US nuke deployment and open a "missile gap" but we had a 10:1 advantage at the time. By the time JFK/LBJ were out it was 3:1. By the time Reagan cancelled "detante", they had actually leapfrogged us. Politics is funny that way.
@@mattllaves numbers in those days were based mostly on human intelligence and on the amount of industrial activity in areas where we knew nuclear development was being done via U2 flyovers and the like. You are right that this would be a gross estimate at best.
What is not mentioned is that Italy at Aviano NATO Air base has alot, all belonging to the dmUSA which they can use when ever they want and the Italian government has no power over it.
@@Joker-no1uh yep, but also because Italy since the 2nd WW has been ruled by the Mafia and USA tbh. In Italy every one knows this, our government is corruption and tge USA dictate to them. Sad, but true!
Are you a American? If the Italian government becomes uncomfortable with Aviano nukes it can order them removed by the US. And, if the US is slow to take them away the Italians can seize them and forcibly return them to America. What's the benefit to.Italy to keep nukes there?
Kazakhstan, Ukraine and Belarus have never had nuclear weapons. These were the heads of the USSR, located in various parts of its territory, including the territory of the USSR, the BSSR and others. To say the opposite is the same as saying that the US nuclear heads located in Belgium, Italy and Turkey are the nuclear weapons of these countries
Ukraine held control of the nukes. When the USSR collapsed, so did their control. Ukraine didn't want them, and eventually signed a deal to give them back. But they weren't under Russian control.
After the collapse of the soviets, the weapons still remained on their territory. The main command post no longer existed. The fact that these countries surrendered their nuclear arsenals is a result of the Lisbon Protocol. This was a collective decision and a joint agreement, not the desire of one of the parties. So technically they had nuclear weapons and, more likely, if they had not accepted this protocol, they would have remained nuclear powers.
No, it was a Soviet nuclear weapon controlled from Moscow. And Ukraine, Kazakhstan, and Belarus could not launch it in 1992 - only from Moscow. Just like Belgium today cannot launch American nuclear weapons located on its territory
Ничего удивительного. На Западе энергетический кризис и психологическая травма от поражения во Вьетнаме. В СССР благоприятные цены на нефть и то, что было заложено Сталиным в экономике и образовании дало свои плоды.
Imagine what all the money spent by our government on military could do to improve everyones lives , instead of being hellbent on destroying everything
Imagine if people got off their fat lazy backsides and worked to improve their own lives instead of expecting the government to do everything for them.
Sorry, EVERYONE in the world is lazy and has a fat arse? What are you talking about? I worked.very hard all my life and now I have a comfortable, well-deserved retirement, I think how much better health and how much more years of healthy life I might have if literally thousands of trillions hadn't been spent on nuclear weapons. Does that explain it?
It might be better to imagine that your sat in your garden ,and your neighbour wants to expand his fence with a bulldozer , good luck persuading him to stop with your unicorn 🦄
Zulfikar Ali Bhutto said that Pakistan will have nuclear weapons even if it meant Pakistanis had to later eat grass Thanks to China, Pakistan has nuclear weapons and Pakistanis are eating grass
they are built for deterence. do you know the means of deterence?😂😂😂😂😂At this point its better that any country can have but it surely doesn t mean conventional wars cannot exist anymore.
@@shahid8545 fuck if nukes are used as you think even cities would have their own arsenal. Does the world Deterrence means nothing to you? Probably not.
Philippines should have its nuclear capability around the year 1970s.. if it wasn't for that revolution which promises progress, freedom which turns out to be the opposite.. so sad..
Pues si que bajaron drásticamente con lis acuerdos que tuvieron ¿ solo mira la urss con 40 mil warheads activados ?ahora solo 4800 de actual Rusia Ya son menos los golpes 🤪
@@hydrogenivtinyhare5218 The launching vehicle has shown on 2019 parade all added together could have more than 400 nuclear warhead launching capability. Warheads are actually cheaper than the rockets and the vehicles, so there should be slightly more missiles than the launchers. They can't bring all the launchers for a parade, there must be more of them staying in position. That I think it is a safe guess to double that number to be the minimum of the total number.
@@henrywang3977 I checked your estimation, you’re about there. There were 16x DF-17, 32x DF-100, 16x DF-26, 12x JL-2, 16x DF-31, 4x DF-5B, 16x DF-41. In which DF-17 and DF-100 are not nuclear compatible, DF-26, JL-2, and DF-31 can carry 3 small warheads, DF-5B can carry 1 big warhead, and DF-41 can carry 10 small warheads. Assume they were all loaded with nuclear warheads, the total was 296 nukes.
هل هناك تكنولوجيا لتحويل الطاقة النووية للقنابل الحربية الذرية الي طاقة يمكن التحكم فيها والاستفادة منها بدلا من استخدامها كاداة تدميرية إرهابية قاتلة لو الإجابة بالنفي لا توجد فهنا تقع المصيبة كيف نصنع شيئ كهذا ليدمر الأرض التي تجعلنا أحياء على سطحها
How many times should it be reminded that Ukraine, Kazakhstan and Belarus have never possessed (were the owners of) a single nuclear warhead. They were deployed on their territory, but these weapons were commanded, guarded, and maintained by the joint forces of the CIS.
@@arfanhaziq3075 of course. Holding a nuclear weapon is not about destruction like it is about the paranoia of its holder and the threatened of those who might be its potential target.
INDIAN nuclear test was Conducted on May 18, 1974, in the Indian Army's Test Range in Pokhran, Rajasthan, India's first successful nuclear weapons test demonstrated the country's emergence as the 6th N-power after the United States, Soviet Union (now Russia), United Kingdom, France, and China.....I think you're all videos are outdated and you did not research before making this type of videos
This is a bit misleading. Active warheads don’t automatically imply ability to deploy. It also doesn’t take into account deployment technology. Most of the US deployment is focused on submarines. Most Russian nukes are geared for land-based deployment. Also, Russia’s war with Ukraine has amply demonstrated the gap between _theoretical_ war footing and actual capabilities. There’s rampant decay, corruption, lack of training, and incompetence at every level. Imo, there’s equal chances as to whether a launched warhead would 1) not actually launch 2) simply crash into the nearest urban center 3) come down on some random non-target 4) actually make it to the intended target but not activate 5) actually activate as intended. Some of the US systems are also aging but we’re aware of the issues. These mostly affect the silo-based systems that don’t figure into most response plans.
Lest we forget, USA would not have had these weapons without the European scientists. Even Oppenheimer studied at Cavendish at Cambridge which has always been the foremost physics school since scientific revolution almost. Oppenheimer was academically excellent but his lab skills were an abonimation according to eminent Physicists Rutherford et al
Американцы обманули Россию сказали что будут сокращать вместе пока Россия сокращала они свои закапывали в земли!хотя они сами России выделили деньги на постройку специальных заводов по утелизации ядерного оружия и Россия исполняла этот договор а они нет
The odd one here is Pak The number of nukes they have is far outstripped by the number of begging bowls in circulation begging for money to run their country
The US could've conquered the world after WWII with it's nuke arsenal and while the rest of the world are still reeling from the aftermath. Yet it did not. Instead, the US helped rebuild those mostly affected by the War, like Japan. It would've been a different story if it was the Nazis who triumphed.
You mean it could have conquered the whole world by nuking all the countries? Ok, yes. That's true. Why would the US want to do that? What would be the purpose of having a polluted and radioactive planet with the US as the only liveable country on the planet? Actually, I don't get your point. Please explain.
Anyone who think human is not the most powerful species in the world and think that human not in the top of food chain is wrong. 1 Nuclear Arsenal can have 3,000 times the explosive power of Hiroshima Nuclear Bombing
True, both the US and Russia hit some pretty scary big numbers, but I was surprised - and happy to see - that both the US and Russia reduced their stockpiles significantly over the years.
Правильно было бы сказать, что на территории Казахстана когда-то размещалось ядерное оружие, которое Казахстан не мог использовать и содержать самостоятельно. Вряд-ли эту ситуацию можно назвать обладанием ядерным оружием. Тоже самое можно сказать и об Украине. Разместить на своей территории и распоряжаться - это разные вещи.
You should not have put Kazakhstan and Ukraine in the count. Or you should also include italy and Germany who have US warhead on their territories but do not have the clearance nor the ability to use them.
@@kolyakordai5213он всего лишь пишет что не стоило Казахстан и Украину в эту графику вставлять. Так как самостоятельно они не владели ядерным оружием. Оружие находилось на территории, но управлялось из Москвы и после развала СССР постепенно было вывезено. Намекнул на то что ядерное оружие находящееся в Германии и Италии тоже им не принадлежит, это все имущество США. Тоесть ничего хорошего и плохого комментатор не писал.
Wouldn't it be crazy if the world did eliminate all nuclear weapons, and then discovered an asteroid headed straight at us, and we had just gotten rid of every device that could have saved us?
@@mayakstudios7292 это решать самим казахам а не тебе. Тем более есть возможности и технологии для создания ядерного оружия. И заводы способные создать носителей как минимум на средней дальности. До Москвы могущие доставать.
If you pay attention not only US and Russia back and forth in an arms race, Pakistan and India are in one as well, just on a smaller scale.
Yeh no sh1t, Sherlock
Should have shown two being subtracted from United States in 1945
I don’t think they counted those, since the nuclear arms race officially begins after they were deployed.
Well those were atomic bombs not nuclear warheads
3, there's the trinity test on July 16.
Thermonuclear weapons are the only thing which prevents full scale WWIII. Nuclear deterence is a real thing that works, lets hope that it countinues to work as intended.
Something wrong here, India conducted it's first nuclear test in 1974, so surely it had the nuclear weapon.
India and Pakistan had the ability to produce nuclear weapons in the 60's. It was not until late 90's that they engaged in a nuclear arms race. Both countries had operational nuclear reactors running in 60's.
America went full steam ahead with their nuke production after the war.
Man will eventually destroy himself and his world. Do they really need all those nuclear weapons? It's disgusting.
Or Artificial intelligence could be a threat! Indeed tens of thousands nukes is nonsense and utter stupidity particularly from the US and Russia!
I views politics and the politics of war , propaganda in politics, as something very immature.and Lacking in any Honor
Absolutely we need. Because of nuclear weapons WW3 is not happening
@@rudragaming6977I agree or we destroy ourself in many ways, many differences…
Ядерное оружие является очень хорошим аргументом сдерживания. К слову та же Северная Корея сейчас себя чувствует намного лучше как раз за счёт Ядерного оружия и поддержки России. Поверь мне без этого оружия Пхеньян себя чувствовал намного сложнее особенно когда часто проводились военные учения между Америкой и Южной Кореей тогда часто самолёты этих стран практически заходили на территорию Северной Кореи и пытались спровоцировать на ответ и это могло сработать во первых радары явно не могли точно показать в нужное время что самолёты не долетели и развернулись, а во вторых Пхеньян вот он, до него рукой подать, а там сотни самых важных людей страны находится. Думаю объяснять что Южная Корея перестала подобным заниматься из-за появления Ядерного оружия у Северной Кореи, думаю не стоит, сам поймёшь 😊
Quantity comparison with nuke overkills is like two guys counting their matches with one having 2 and the other one having 5 on the hand - and a bathub full of petrol between them.
I remember the height of the Arms Race and the end of it.
The Arms Race was TERRIFYING. We’re still feeling the effects today. I don’t think people realize how deeply that conflict scarred the world.
I genuinely cannot stand Reagan. However, his decision to up the ante with space-based defense was absolutely the hole in the dike of the Iron Wall.
With that shift, we only need about 25% of our full arsenal to glass every Russian urban center and defense sector. And it can happen before 50% of anything Russia launches, gets here.
That would be absolutely awful. But as Sting sang,
“There’s no such thing as a winnable war.
It’s a lie we don’t believe any more…
Believe me when I say to you,
I hope the Russians love their children, too.”
Good use of background music here. Definately reflects the danger of the situation!
It's funny how we invented the means to wipe out the entire earth even before we solved anything
Советский союз, это мощь !!!
Русский союз русская федерация русские
Его нет ! Его убили русские .
Русским вообще нельзя доверять власть .
Горбачев развалил страну . Ельцин пропил и продал страну. Путин добивает и распродаёт то что осталось от них . А народу дал ложный патриотизм того , чего уже давно нет . Живут прошлым и думают о прошлом .
These are precise, accurate numbers to the penny.
But, doesn't the present us have enough men,real men to fight a long bloody war ? I don't think so, and men win wars.any doubt, sissies?😂😂btw, Ukraine is fighting a proxy war for the US now, and that's how it's gonna become,that's until others get it,and that is, the US doesn't have real men anymore!!Men without balls don't win wars!!😂😂
Honestly, how would anyone really know these numbers. It’s not like this is advertised public information. 🤔
Exactly. Look how accurate U.S. intelligence was for Iraq.
My thoughts are no nation will ever know exactly how many nukes other countries may have no matter how high tech their intelligence may be...
.. not even a ball park figure.
I was thinking the same thing. You have no idea how many nukes anyone else has. Crazy to think you know these details by year.
@@thelocallocksmithcompany-t9164 são estimativas com base em análises de documentos. Todos sabíamos a e os Estados Unidos estava mentindo sobre o Iraque, como em quase todas suas guerras.
That's just straight scary ! 👁️
From the time a baby boomer was born to the time they were teenagers, the world had gone from 0 to some 30,000 nuclear weapons.
Quantity is never an issue, the issue is who dares to use it. and whether they can bear the consequences.😀
Maybe you’ve forgotten? Americans have used them twice on a civilian population in Nagasaki and Hiroshima.
Yes, but back at that time no one but America had it. Today, everyone have it.
США уже применяли ядерное оружие против Японии. Не стесняясь. Миллионы жертв от двух маленьких бомб.
I agree. Depends who's devilish enough to push the big red button
@@sunnyboner676Maybe you’ve forgotten that civilians were fair game during WW2, if it achieved a larger strategic picture.
In 1960, the Kennedy campaign tried to claim that Eisenhower had allowed the USSR to leap frog the US nuke deployment and open a "missile gap" but we had a 10:1 advantage at the time. By the time JFK/LBJ were out it was 3:1. By the time Reagan cancelled "detante", they had actually leapfrogged us. Politics is funny that way.
I imagine it would have been extremely difficult to tell how many nukes the Soviets had at the time
@@mattllaves numbers in those days were based mostly on human intelligence and on the amount of industrial activity in areas where we knew nuclear development was being done via U2 flyovers and the like. You are right that this would be a gross estimate at best.
@@mattllavesImage the world where a man with a stone axe could rule .
Because he could if no one else had nothing.
Мы всегда были впереди вас 😂
@@user-zp7wc5nl2pпо яйцам? Или по окорочкам? А может по выпуску автомобилей?
Не смеши людей…
Which software do you use for making this racing bar? Please Reply...
O video original pertence ao canal "La vida en lo gráfico"
Plz make vedio on total internet users by countries
Its the same as population , for last 10 yeras at least.
All the world is a madhouse. They are all nuts.
Mostly politicians
"No mouse would develop the idea to build a mouse trap!"
What a shame for humanity 😢
What is not mentioned is that Italy at Aviano NATO Air base has alot, all belonging to the dmUSA which they can use when ever they want and the Italian government has no power over it.
Same for when Ukraine "had" them
Maybe because they belong to the US? Just a guess
@@Joker-no1uh yep, but also because Italy since the 2nd WW has been ruled by the Mafia and USA tbh. In Italy every one knows this, our government is corruption and tge USA dictate to them. Sad, but true!
Italians don't do war good
Are you a American? If the Italian government becomes uncomfortable with Aviano nukes it can order them removed by the US. And, if the US is slow to take them away the Italians can seize them and forcibly return them to America. What's the benefit to.Italy to keep nukes there?
Aren't they scared if it all blew up in their own countries? Crazy.
Use need ro mix two materials to make nuclear reaction, both are kept separately
@CrazyPanda.000 excuse me? 😂 not anywhere closeto how a nuclear bomb works.
Honestly .... This Is Only what they want that we know.
These are strategic nuclear weapons. Russia also has 20,000+ such charges. These are special 152mm, 230mm shells.
60 thousands heads at the pinacle what a madness
Kazakhstan, Ukraine and Belarus have never had nuclear weapons. These were the heads of the USSR, located in various parts of its territory, including the territory of the USSR, the BSSR and others. To say the opposite is the same as saying that the US nuclear heads located in Belgium, Italy and Turkey are the nuclear weapons of these countries
Ukraine held control of the nukes. When the USSR collapsed, so did their control. Ukraine didn't want them, and eventually signed a deal to give them back. But they weren't under Russian control.
After the collapse of the soviets, the weapons still remained on their territory. The main command post no longer existed. The fact that these countries surrendered their nuclear arsenals is a result of the Lisbon Protocol. This was a collective decision and a joint agreement, not the desire of one of the parties. So technically they had nuclear weapons and, more likely, if they had not accepted this protocol, they would have remained nuclear powers.
No, it was a Soviet nuclear weapon controlled from Moscow. And Ukraine, Kazakhstan, and Belarus could not launch it in 1992 - only from Moscow. Just like Belgium today cannot launch American nuclear weapons located on its territory
Lies again? Dallas Bull S**t USD SGD
@@dvaplustwo , soviets don’t exist from December 26, 1991.
Something that doesn’t exist cannot posses or control anything.
Suggestion: Minerals
Late 70s must totally be Soviet Union golden era
Конец 70х стал причиной распада СССР
@@QQru3nikНезнайка на Луне
Ничего удивительного. На Западе энергетический кризис и психологическая травма от поражения во Вьетнаме. В СССР благоприятные цены на нефть и то, что было заложено Сталиным в экономике и образовании дало свои плоды.
На самом деле 60е, если мы берем все показатели, включая качество жизни.
Ну основная масса наших родителей и родственников считают, что 70е были лучшим временем в СССР
I was of the understanding it only takes one!
The numbers are down, the power went up
First Music : The Great War
Second Music : The Eternal War
На другом канале совсем другие данные были в графике 🤷♂️
O Japão e Coreia do Sul possuía matéria prima pra construir as ogivas, está na hora de cada um ter 300 ogivas-dissuasão
I agree that Cuba will have 500 warheads.
Nicaragua? Why not?
They have to speak with their boss first
Ахаха ты сначало на карту мира посмотри и попробуй найти на ней свою японию и мелкобританию им вообще нет смысла что то иметь🚀💥🇯🇵🏳️🌈🇬🇧💥🤣🤣
Japan is puppet of usa😢@@FhillipFry
So all the ol ones went on ebay?
- Я не знаю какой будет 3-я мировая война , но четвёртая точно будет на палках !
Эйнштейн.
Imagine what all the money spent by our government on military could do to improve everyones lives , instead of being hellbent on destroying everything
With out a military, enemy states can just walk in an ruin your peaceful life.
Imagine if people got off their fat lazy backsides and worked to improve their own lives instead of expecting the government to do everything for them.
No military= Putin and Xi Ping will be your leader
Sorry, EVERYONE in the world is lazy and has a fat arse? What are you talking about? I worked.very hard all my life and now I have a comfortable, well-deserved retirement, I think how much better health and how much more years of healthy life I might have if literally thousands of trillions hadn't been spent on nuclear weapons. Does that explain it?
It might be better to imagine that your sat in your garden ,and your neighbour wants to expand his fence with a bulldozer , good luck persuading him to stop with your unicorn 🦄
¿Irán what are you waiting for?
No one can stop them if they will dare to make it
Where are a the obsolete ones?
So we now know who started the nuclear arms race.
It was never not known
Gog and magog..
Fun fact- couple of ussr nukes are missing after ussr fell.
And a couple of US nukes were lost in the ocean and were never found...
Brazil?
Japan also had 2💀💀💀
VERY active nuclear warheads
Had
Thats scary
Zulfikar Ali Bhutto said that Pakistan will have nuclear weapons even if it meant Pakistanis had to later eat grass
Thanks to China, Pakistan has nuclear weapons and Pakistanis are eating grass
Actually it's USA who helped pakistan to get nukes as Pakistan was the biggest non nato ally of USA in cold war to counter india
India like always scored second position in world hunger index South Asia now tell who is eating grass
@@factsofrealsandreels1911but I'm not hungry😮
India has more hunger index than Pakistan but urine drinker have audacity to say Pakistan poor
@@cobra28373wtf! You are not hungry it means others are also not hungry,what a cringe indian mindset😂😂😂
Nuclear bombs have devastating effects, but it becomes necessary to have them if your enemy has them.
who did say that
One thing is for sure. They didn't build and research this tech to have them sitting around. They will be used a some point.
they are built for deterence. do you know the means of deterence?😂😂😂😂😂At this point its better that any country can have but it surely doesn t mean conventional wars cannot exist anymore.
@@Rayxxx19741 You don't think these will not be used? Don't be so gullible. They have already been used and they will be used again.
@@shahid8545 fuck if nukes are used as you think even cities would have their own arsenal. Does the world Deterrence means nothing to you? Probably not.
@@Rayxxx19741 Nuclear have already been used pinhead. Remember Hiroshima and Nagasaki?
Disgrace why 🥺
Oppenheimer you smarty pants
I wonder how many of these are tactical nukes, compared to ICBM nukes?
Philippines should have its nuclear capability around the year 1970s.. if it wasn't for that revolution which promises progress, freedom which turns out to be the opposite.. so sad..
The united states need to start sharing out some of that loove❤
With?
China in 2020 have 270
Then in 2022 have 410😂
Have you not seen the Us reports on how China is rapidly increasing its nuclear arsenal and building silos to house them?
Если сшп на своей территории ВСЕ свои заряды взорвёт, то этого достаточно, чтобы человек прекратил существование
Who tried to hold all the power first? Interesting....
Espero que el cabezas nucleares no comience a crecer😢
Pues si que bajaron drásticamente con lis acuerdos que tuvieron ¿ solo mira la urss con 40 mil warheads activados ?ahora solo 4800 de actual Rusia
Ya son menos los golpes 🤪
В 45 году у США должно было уменьшиться количество на 2.
Biggest diffrence? Our stuff works
Ukraine shows that no material is what governments say it is
Нет тут никакой разницы, дружок, это все очень нехорошо.
U dckhd
Way to be there Canada...oh snap, they didn't even make the list
China is not exactly transparent on the stock number of nuclear arsenal yet. All the available numbers are guesses.
So what is the numbers u think ?
@@sksksks5072 Hardly known. But I guess it wouldn't be less than 1000 since 2018.
@@henrywang3977What’s your guess based on?
@@hydrogenivtinyhare5218 The launching vehicle has shown on 2019 parade all added together could have more than 400 nuclear warhead launching capability. Warheads are actually cheaper than the rockets and the vehicles, so there should be slightly more missiles than the launchers. They can't bring all the launchers for a parade, there must be more of them staying in position. That I think it is a safe guess to double that number to be the minimum of the total number.
@@henrywang3977 I checked your estimation, you’re about there. There were 16x DF-17, 32x DF-100, 16x DF-26, 12x JL-2, 16x DF-31, 4x DF-5B, 16x DF-41. In which DF-17 and DF-100 are not nuclear compatible, DF-26, JL-2, and DF-31 can carry 3 small warheads, DF-5B can carry 1 big warhead, and DF-41 can carry 10 small warheads. Assume they were all loaded with nuclear warheads, the total was 296 nukes.
Without Indonesia, it's impossible for US to produce nuclear warhead so drastically. They exploited all nuclear materials from Freeport Hills.
Tener esas armas debería ser un delito
The two at the top have the power to wipe out the human species, a couple times over. So that's fun.
It doesn't matter who's wrong or right, we're all ded! D-E-D...ded!
1945 Little Boy and Fat Man. 1961 Tsar Bomba... and the rest is history.
Iran ?
How many times over to destroy the planet is really necessary?
No es algo de lo que sentir mucho orgullo.
هل هناك تكنولوجيا لتحويل الطاقة النووية للقنابل الحربية الذرية الي طاقة يمكن التحكم فيها والاستفادة منها بدلا من استخدامها كاداة تدميرية إرهابية قاتلة لو الإجابة بالنفي لا توجد فهنا تقع المصيبة كيف نصنع شيئ كهذا ليدمر الأرض التي تجعلنا أحياء على سطحها
MOX технология...
Not one of them will ever be fired in anger either. The world starves to death while it slowly heats up and what was the bill in taxes for these WMD?
Corea del Norte con muchas carencias materiales y con un paupérrimo nivel de vida de sus habitantes pero eso sí con armas nucleares.
How about Iran and Indonesia, why don't you have data about it
USA: "Quick! Soviet Union has 1 warhead! Faster god dammit!"
MAD
How many times should it be reminded that Ukraine, Kazakhstan and Belarus have never possessed (were the owners of) a single nuclear warhead. They were deployed on their territory, but these weapons were commanded, guarded, and maintained by the joint forces of the CIS.
British testing in Australia, the French in the Pacific. We won't have that in our neighbourhood, please. Peace ✌️🕊️ Au revoir
So Iran has no nuke.. But US is very worried 😂
Iran DOES have nuclear scientists... according to these moments😉😉
@@pq_az Almost every country in the world have nuclear scientist.. and US still worried 🤣🤣🤣
@@arfanhaziq3075 of course. Holding a nuclear weapon is not about destruction like it is about the paranoia of its holder and the threatened of those who might be its potential target.
They have Uranium which can be used to build nuclear weapons.
South Africa giving up it's nuclear weapons want a mistake.
INDIAN nuclear test was Conducted on May 18, 1974, in the Indian Army's Test Range in Pokhran, Rajasthan, India's first successful nuclear weapons test demonstrated the country's emergence as the 6th N-power after the United States, Soviet Union (now Russia), United Kingdom, France, and China.....I think you're all videos are outdated and you did not research before making this type of videos
Where is Japan?
Off the east coast of Asia.😅
Many countries have the technology to build them today but there's an agreement of non proliferation of nuclear warheads
This is a bit misleading. Active warheads don’t automatically imply ability to deploy. It also doesn’t take into account deployment technology.
Most of the US deployment is focused on submarines. Most Russian nukes are geared for land-based deployment.
Also, Russia’s war with Ukraine has amply demonstrated the gap between _theoretical_ war footing and actual capabilities. There’s rampant decay, corruption, lack of training, and incompetence at every level.
Imo, there’s equal chances as to whether a launched warhead would
1) not actually launch
2) simply crash into the nearest urban center
3) come down on some random non-target
4) actually make it to the intended target but not activate
5) actually activate as intended.
Some of the US systems are also aging but we’re aware of the issues. These mostly affect the silo-based systems that don’t figure into most response plans.
Lest we forget, USA would not have had these weapons without the European scientists. Even Oppenheimer studied at Cavendish at Cambridge which has always been the foremost physics school since scientific revolution almost. Oppenheimer was academically excellent but his lab skills were an abonimation according to eminent Physicists Rutherford et al
USA 🇺🇸 Best of the Best 💪🏼💪🏼💪🏼💪🏼💪🏼😎
😂
🏴☠️+🏳️🌈=🇺🇲
can anyone explain how these nuclear warheads keep on decreasing if they were not using it
Американцы обманули Россию сказали что будут сокращать вместе пока Россия сокращала они свои закапывали в земли!хотя они сами России выделили деньги на постройку специальных заводов по утелизации ядерного оружия и Россия исполняла этот договор а они нет
Google INF treaty (1987) START 1 treaty (1991) etc
@@q___m2158 here
The odd one here is Pak
The number of nukes they have is far outstripped by the number of begging bowls in circulation begging for money to run their country
Ha ha…. This list is like asking a woman how many “bodies” she got….whatever she says, just double or triple that number 😂💀
It is sad that countries are subject to embargoes from developed countries, because of the impact of nuclear development 😢
Anyone else scratching their head over a country like Pakistan having 170? Huh?
Erm, not really. Haven’t they had about four wars with India?
The US could've conquered the world after WWII with it's nuke arsenal and while the rest of the world are still reeling from the aftermath. Yet it did not. Instead, the US helped rebuild those mostly affected by the War, like Japan.
It would've been a different story if it was the Nazis who triumphed.
Зато нацисты передали эстафету России.
You mean it could have conquered the whole world by nuking all the countries?
Ok, yes. That's true. Why would the US want to do that? What would be the purpose of having a polluted and radioactive planet with the US as the only liveable country on the planet?
Actually, I don't get your point. Please explain.
😂😂😂😂
@@armandoassante9168Глупо такое писать.
Зачем США было уничтожать мир, если они были главными выигравшими в нём? Им ничего не угрожало и не угрожает сейчас.
Anyone who think human is not the most powerful species in the world and think that human not in the top of food chain is wrong. 1 Nuclear Arsenal can have 3,000 times the explosive power of Hiroshima Nuclear Bombing
They May Have The Most, But You Failed to List ALL Countries With Nuclear Weapons!
Iran, India,.......
Iran?! Not bloody likely!
@@Shapinator721
Keep telling yourself that! 🙄
United Kingdom: FFS, 500 is enough.
United States: What??!! Too much is never enough!
Soviet Union: Hold my Vodka.
True, both the US and Russia hit some pretty scary big numbers, but I was surprised - and happy to see - that both the US and Russia reduced their stockpiles significantly over the years.
Қазақстан 1400 атом бомбасы бар ел болған 1994 жылға дейін.
которыми они не могли пользоваться чисто физически :)
Правильно было бы сказать, что на территории Казахстана когда-то размещалось ядерное оружие, которое Казахстан не мог использовать и содержать самостоятельно. Вряд-ли эту ситуацию можно назвать обладанием ядерным оружием.
Тоже самое можно сказать и об Украине. Разместить на своей территории и распоряжаться - это разные вещи.
You should not have put Kazakhstan and Ukraine in the count. Or you should also include italy and Germany who have US warhead on their territories but do not have the clearance nor the ability to use them.
Что ты там пишешь насчёт Казахстана ?
@@kolyakordai5213ничего хорошего.
@@user-vq7td8bd7i так и понял.
@@kolyakordai5213он всего лишь пишет что не стоило Казахстан и Украину в эту графику вставлять. Так как самостоятельно они не владели ядерным оружием. Оружие находилось на территории, но управлялось из Москвы и после развала СССР постепенно было вывезено. Намекнул на то что ядерное оружие находящееся в Германии и Италии тоже им не принадлежит, это все имущество США. Тоесть ничего хорошего и плохого комментатор не писал.
apples oranges
Boggles the mind. Only a very small percentage of nukes is required to wipe out the earth ffs
Wouldn't it be crazy if the world did eliminate all nuclear weapons, and then discovered an asteroid headed straight at us, and we had just gotten rid of every device that could have saved us?
Hollywood ???
We don't have the ability to stop an asteroid with a nuke.
You've watched too many movies 🍿
Самое страшное как раз то, что ядеркой обладают как Индия, так и Пакистан
Скоро может к ним присоединиться и Казахстан к твоему сведению. Если Россия не изменит свое поведение по отношению к соседним странам.
@@kolyakordai5213 не присоединится. Россия тут вообще причем, тролль?
🥴
@@mayakstudios7292 это решать самим казахам а не тебе. Тем более есть возможности и технологии для создания ядерного оружия. И заводы способные создать носителей как минимум на средней дальности. До Москвы могущие доставать.
@@kolyakordai5213 что ты все про Россию и Москву несёшь. Американские ракеты могут с легкостью долететь до Оттавы, представь себе
When SU made first, US had 150 already....To protect themselves.......😂😂😂😂😂
Спасибо советским ученым , что в 49 году изобрели ядерное оружие!