Dunkley & the Coalition's Future | Unparliamentary with Rachel Withers
Vložit
- čas přidán 3. 03. 2024
- Today on Unparliamentary, we discuss what's next for the Liberal Party and the Coalition after the loss in Dunkley - is a leadership rethink in order?
Unparliamentary is the Australia Institute’s fortnightly show that gives you the scoop on what’s happening in federal politics.
On today's episode, we unpack the big political and policy issues with Rachel Withers, Editor-in-Chief, at The Politics, hosted by Ebony Bennett.
Sign up to get our latest analysis sent to you via our fortnightly newsletter!
📧 theaus.in/newsletter
Help us make more videos like this by becoming a supporter:
❤️ theaus.in/donateYT
Brilliant chat guy's 💪🙌
Great discussion and an excellent guest.
Great show, I'm a little confused. Australian policy is designed by corporations, often foreign. Why don't you focus on the actual decision makers until the Australian population stops voting in the lab, lib, nat parties.
Related to this comment: Australian policy is also influenced (perhaps dictated?) by foreign entities. Mr Burgess gave us a tantalising glimpse into this, which these ladies touched on (but did not properly address, either).
Edit:spelling
The housing crisis is the elephant in the room why is nobody discussing it ?
@@attilajuhasz2526everyone is too scared to name America as the imperialist, borderline fascist empire that they are. Australians are supposed to pretend like they're allies, and that China and Russia are so much worse.
@vincentcacciola7161 we are, check out DFA
The housing crisis is the elephant in the room why is nobody discussing it ?
The housing crisis could be substantially alleviated by stopping foreign buyers from gobbling up residential property and parking it in an unused state as a future investment hedge.
Libs won't fix it. They started it!
It's been spoken about at lengths across all media channels, just because it might not be mentioned doesn't mean it isn't any less important.
With respect, any reference to the use, good or bad of Nuclear Power, should acknowledge the fact of holographic nucleation Singularity-point, ie if Commentary on parliamentary conduct and procedures is necessarily a reiterative reintegration of emergent phenomena, and that inherently required reconstructive philosophy has been practically eliminated by what are basically the languages of psychopathology, ..then a complete resetting of the relevant glossary of terms is well overdue.
MMT Provisioning concepts, when applied through the mechanism of constructive Colonisation strategies, are a kind of naturally defensive military strategy, which by default, would absolutely choose to remake our energy source and distribution Nuclear, and absolutely keep it from being used as weapons in the hands of the current set of psychopaths.
Setting up the Australian Colonies cost less than maintaining the British Prisons, so we're told, and the two-faced politics of displacing the disposal of human bodies to the other side of the world was only a continuance of what had been done in the American Colonies.
Discussion around Authoritarian Rule based on what is perceived to be perfectly hypocritical abuse of religious training and trust, is a kind of natural human behaviour, so holding extreme opinions on a malleable unscientific set of opinions is typical, and an equally balancing reflection of contempt for this behaviour is to be expected, but it will never help anyone except the psychopathic perpetrators. This is why Universal Education is an imperative.
Lots of bias and propaganda, isn't there.
Hopefully the parties work towards listening to Aussies instead of echo chambers