@@DistractedGlobeGuy I watched Chris' entire saga and genuinely, literally thought it was a pretty funny parody, that they were basically parodying CZcamsr drama, because of how exaggeratedly whiny and unselfaware Chris was being, and because I had a decent amount of respect for him, I'd assumed they were on the same sarcasm level. When the punch line never revealed itself, I had a "Oh....oh no... oh god oh no.." moment xD Lost all respect for him. What a prick. What a way to fulfill his own prophecy.
Dan Aykroyd believes in everything... Seen ufos "three or four times", crystal skulls real, Samsquach probable, Loch Ness Monster totally not whaledick, crystals clean vodka etc. etc. He's a trip.
Rich's throw away idea about the Empire State Building being a giant ghost trap and the engineers being the original Ghostbusters was ten times better than anything in Ghostbusters 2016.
The scene where Ernie Hudson and Dan Akroyd discuss the end of the world sold the very real threat that differentiates the original from any other incarnation
Also a solid Ernie Hudson scene: “The dead HAVE been rising from the grave.” Ernie Hudson had some great line deliveries in the first one. “If there’s a steady paycheck in it, I’ll believe anything you say.” “When someone asks you if you’re a god, you say YES!”
Why do so many people like MIB3? It was by far the worst of the series, in my opinion, way worse than even 2. MIB2 was stupid, but at least entertaining, funny, and actually had Tommy Lee Jones. Tommy Lee Jones is not in MIB3 enough, and didn't like the time travel plot, wish they didn't go with time travel.
I initially thought that the 3rd film was gonna be overkill. Why make a third? Then you see that Ending and BAM! That made it all worth it and brought that whole series full circle and made it a proper trilogy! Which I never saw coming or thought possible.
Thing about the original was that it was the result of a long relationship between the main players involved. Ramis, Reitman and Murray had just done stripes and these guys with Ackroyd had come through the live comedy scene together. The unique chemistry and comedy was a many year long relationship that can't possibly be recreated by just casting funny people with a clever script. Thats "corporate comedy" as they say.
Well, the same could be said about the new cast. McCarthy and Wiig were both in Bridesmaids which was directed by Paul Fieg. And Wiig, McKinnon, and Jones were all on SNL. So there should be a definite chemistry between of all them that they've built up. Of course it won't be as good as Ramis, Murray and Ackroyd but there should still be chemistry between the new actresses. But as far as the script... I have no idea because I haven't seen it yet.
It's not. McKinnon is just playing a clown (think Harpo Marx) who occasionally says something relevant as far as she built some gadget for them to bomb through ghosts without actually trapping them. Jones is the reactionary one whose knowledge of New York is never really that important. McCarthy is a either a shitty friend or is just petty/immature. And Wiig is her usual awkward therefore embarrassed by the awkward wet blanket. Kate and Melissa have a "kid and his clown" relationship, Kristen and Melissa have a minor tiff in the past relationship, Wiig and Kate have a WTF are you doing relationship in that direction, and Jones and Kate have a B.A. Baracus/Howling Mad Murdock from the A-Team movie relationship at times.
Bridesmaids is no Stripes dude! Also Ramis and Ackroyd WROTE the material that they were to ACT in Ghostbusters. (As well as Ramis having co written Stripes ). Ghostbusters evolved out of their intense years long relationship. This 2016 crew is taking those ideas and trying to make it work with completely different people. There's no comparison.
@@10FRANKTV Plus Harold Ramis and Dan Ackroyd are comedy WRITERS who had a unique and new vision. Paul Feig just had a pile of money thrown at him and was told to "twist this idea and make some fart jokes and we'll triple our money". What are some of the great quotable lines from Ghostbusters 2016? Mike Hat? One Wanton? Every crack?
30:15 my "professional" opinion as an audio post production monkey is that Bill Murray saying "that's what I heard" is clearly ADR, but also fairly clear to be a match to his on-screen lip flap. So most likely scenario is that he really said it on set (probably as an ad lib) but he was off axis and everybody was yelling/scuffling, so they ADR'd it for clarity. It could be as simple as making sure the audience doesn't say "wait what did he say?" and/or that the director / sound supervisor thought it was funny enough to salvage.
There's a scene in Heavy Metal during the Pentagon sketch where everyone is discussing the current threat but you can clearly hear John Candy say "very reassuring" several times... Takes me out of it lol
It was a Howard Hawke scene with a bunch of people talking over one another, the mic picking up the audio was in the room and Bill was being blocked by dickless. It's pretty basic stuff
+Aaron Carnes Nah. The original is now 40 years old, it's a general rule of thumb that the mainstream doesn't really cares much for pop culture that is over 30-35 years old because the sensibilities of older media is viewed as being disjointed. At that point it's popularly regarded as "old people's" things, and like old people, the mainstream and the media companies that feed them will cease to give that any attention. Who ever talks about ragtime music, vaudeville, Charlie Chaplin, Gone with the Wind, Frank Sinatra, Tom and Jerry, Buddy Holly, 60s Hanna Barbara cartoons, the Brady Bunch, M*A*S*H or C.H.I.P.S. anymore? And when they do try (I'm looking at you, the Three Stooges and John Carter), it's makes it out lukewarm because the current generation doesn't "get it".
CarbonWaterCalcium The point is most pop culture that had been past its prime would still be held up by nostalgia for up to 40-something years, usually by people who grew up with it up until they reach their seniority and are no longer profitable to media companies to exploit wholly. This is true for most modern remakes of lesser but more recent pop culture, like the 1990s Brady Bunch movie, the 1990s and 2000s Knight Rider shows, the 2005 Dukes of Hazzard, the new Hawaii Five-0, the 2000s Garfield movies, the...ugh...Jem movie... Even disregarding the obscurity of the show due to being overshadowed by the 1984 Ghostbusters, the opportunity to remake the 1970s Ghost Busters has past that expiry date of nostalgia years back and would likely fall out of the radar quick if it was ever made.
When Ray says ‘Hey Dean Yeager!’ he’s happy, excited and surprised. He’s a big puppy with good news to share. To my mind Dan Aykroyds delivery was spot on.
@@roberte2945 oh nothing, I just think people overstate the link with the first two and it's often disappointing for people who get the game and don't think the humour works as well. That was why I specified. I personally love the game.
With all of the people out there on You Tube, shouting angrily about how much they love the original Ghostbusters, I think this video contains some of the most sincere and heartfelt statements about why the original is so beloved. Good on you. Thank you.
Ray backing away with his mouth hanging slack and the cigarette stuck to his bottom lip. Just one of many awesome moments in that freaking perfect movie.
I agree it does look that way, but it does sound like ADR also. I would guess they had poor audio and re did it in ADR. Also, I don't think sounding "gay" is something most comedians would care about, just that their act is funny.
This one is a stretch, Bill Murray clearly said something and the dialogue matches. If they ADRed over it I would think it was to cover something a little too edgy.
Theyre more accessible, RLM has a very nihilistic, deadpan kind of humor in which nothing questionable is acknowledged (ex. the latest wheel of the worst had the joke where its implied that mike is hallucinating that those two canadian guys were there, the random cast changes at the end). there's also some fucked up jokes in the plinkett reviews, its just not something the average person looking up "ghostbusters review" would want to watch. The ReView series kind of seems to be acknowledging that, its much less RLM type humor and more of two guys talking
I remember when I first found these dudes, binge watching for two weeks straight... The good thing is that they continuously upload quality content and have multiple outlets. Check out redlettermedia.bandcamp.com to listen to complete movie reviews (audio). They have tons of content and the shows are getting better and better. It's a good time to be on Team Green! The Wizard Rules!
I'm wondering if these guys realize that the Ghostbusters video game was a collaboration between the original cast and the game developers. Dan A. brought the story and it was basically Ghostbusters 3.
"well that's what I heard" fits so well into Murray's character. It's something a kid would say. It's one of my favorite lines from this infinitely quotable perfect film.
For some reason my family would spin the " no human would stack books this way" line. I.e., "No human would wrap a present this way" or " No .....drive a car this way " . Sorry, just randomly added this and I also agree with your comment lol
Jack's laugh replaced Game Station 2.0. I need help deciding which one it was though. Was it "ah, ah, ah, ah, ah, ah, ah" or was it "AAAH, ah, ah, ah, ah, ah, ah, ah?"
'Slimer' was loosely based on John Belushi - especially his character John 'Bluto' Blutarsky from 1978's Animal House. Originally, Dan Aykroyd wrote the Peter Venkman character with Belushi in mind, but he sadly passed away in 1982 and was therefore replaced by Bill Murray. Belushi's spirit was kept alive with Slimer.
Ironically the guy who designed slimer, had the Dan and the director come down and asked him to make slimer look like John Belushi. So he said yeah thats a great idea. Ignored it completely and just gave them the same design again, and both said, it looks just like him.
Awwww! That amazing moment at 21:20 when Mike gets emotional as he remembers the great Harold Ramis. I agree with you Mike, there will never be another Harold Ramis. He was a NOBLE person, a great human being. Rest in Peace, Harold. We will always remember you.
I’ve never been a huge fan of Caddyshack but have always respected not only the performances but the film as a whole. Groundhog Day is an amazing movie that never gets old. Ghostbusters how ever was the first movie I saw. I was born in 1985 and Ghostbusters was my first love. I grew up watching it over and over again. All my babysitters would tell my mom, “all he wants to do is watch Ghostbusters.” In 1989 Ghostbusters 2 came out and it fell right into the rotation. It wasn’t till I was older that I found out that Ghostbusters 2 isn’t as highly regarded as the first. To me, it is just as good. I loved all of the Ghostbusters but my favorite was Peter. Bill Murray stole the show every time! That is, until again I was older and I started to pick up on things in the ghostbusters movies that I hadn’t noticed. Even though I had seen them thousands of times. The subtle way Egon feeds the prices to Peter at the hotel. Egon scanning Daina after telling her Peter never talks about her. Egon trying to laugh like a human in the courtroom (Ha-haha). Ramis was a genius at subtle comedic timing. Egon has been my favorite Ghostbuster for sometime now. Now Ramis steals the show ever time and yes, I still watch both Ghostbusters movies all the time. It’s like family.
The ADR line "well thats what I heard" was something Bill Murray improvised and later in production the audio was most likely put in the forefront of the rabble in the scene making it sound ADR
On the "that's what I heard" line - you can see him in the background behind Walter Peck saying it. Also, in the 30 years since I saw it in the theater, I have never ever thought "this man has no dick" meant it was because Bill Murray's character saw him naked. I think someone is overthinking it.
Yeah, this is the ONLY thing about Ghostbusters Mike is mistaken about. Why? Because it makes the joke weak. So why does Venkman do it? Because he's dealing with a politician, trying to convince him that Peck is dangerous and wrong-headed, regardless of his political power. He deftly pokes Peck about his [pickled] pecker in an effort to set him off and make him appear to be the unreasonable one. The Mayor doesn't like Peck but he likes votes more than the Ghostbusters. So Venkman swallows his pride and backs off his burn as soon as Peck goes off, to appear conciliatory to the Major, and not a recalcitrant jackass whom the major can't work with. What rises to the level of allowing Venkman to swallow his outsized pride? Saving The City. Because neither Ray nor Egon - despite their massive intellects - have the ability to persuade the Major at this critical juncture. I suspect Mike has little use for politicians and their War on Humor.
This I think is where Mike reveals that he is ultimately a geek, and not the normal sort of guy he'd like to be believed to be. The blue collar guys I hang out with would make this joke off the cuff, without anyone stopping to ask if he'd actually seen the other naked.
I agree but it kind of sounds like the line was AVR'd, however, to me it seemed like an ad-lib of Bill Murray's comedic gift. The 'no dick' line got a lot of laughs, then the guy starts a fight which was also funny, and then Bill Murray wraps the scene up with a bow with another amusing line. It never seemed to me like he said it due to worry about sounding gay.
I always thought he was responding to Peck yelling at him " I have no dick? How dare you... Blah blah, hoighty toighty snotty Peck line. Was I imagining all that?! Bet my 7 yo mind was obsessed by the willy remark!
To me the entire joke is that they're blue collar exterminators (mundane) who capture ghosts (fantastical) and talk about it like it's a day job. That's it.
Wow, not only was Ghostbusters and Gremlins released on the same week, but they were released on the same day! June 8th, 1984 is one of the greatest days to have ever gone to a movie theater.
It's so weird because I'm pretty sure Stuckmann wasn't definitely what Rich was referring to. I would personally say it's the middle guy, but because he's more well-known CZcams "movie guy" he's referring to Jeremy Jahns. I don't think he even was being mean but just teasing them anyway.
As a kid when Ray yells "aim for the flat top!" during the Goza fight, I thought he was talking about the platform she was standing on?? Which didnt make sense to me. Now I know he meant her head lol
A couple of my favourite bits of this movie are the subtle bits of comedy from Bill Murray and Harold Ramis as Egon and Peter try to scam people. First with the real estate agent as Egon takes Peter's arm in a sign that he's in on trying to argue the price down, and second with the hotel manager as Egon signals how much money Peter should charge them for. It's wonderful.
"She's a dog" was actually a very expository line. It showed you how hurt Venkman was when he saw what happened. Saying that was his way of coping with it, you can see it in his face. It was one of the stronger lines in the movie if you ask me, no joke just real feeling.
There was a Ghostbusters 3 of sorts with the Xbox 360 Ghostbusters game featuring the original cast members - and its bloody fantastic. It’s as close as we got to a third film.
Thank you so much for reminding me of my a childhood memory I'd long forgotten. As a kid I totally couldn't understand Ray's "Hey, Dean Yeager!" line either. Took me years to figure out what the hell he was saying... or perhaps when we got a TV with closed captions.
The line might have been re-done in ADR because it wasn't clear enough with all the other actors talking but you can clearly see his lips when he says the line and it matches up.
According to this morning's video it would be a Twink thirty-five feet long weighing approximately six-hundred pounds. You can see it sitting in the chair on the right-hand side. I mean left. I mean both.
Stantz / Aykroyd is the believer. He looks at everything wide-eyed. Both the character and the actor live the reality of the film. Spenger / Ramis is the brains. He's restrained, looking at it all from a rational point of view. He's an enabler. Both the character (as a scientist) and the actor (as a filmmaker) are there to pivot between the others, make things work. Venkman / Murray is the cynic. To him, the whole thing is just a big joke. The actor is constantly banging against the fourth wall; the character would break it if he was self-aware. Zeddmore / Hudson is the everyman. He looks at the whole thing as an outsider. Both as a character and as an actor, he's just happy to be there. Regardless of what you think of a premise like "four guys with nuclear accelerators, chasing ghosts around New York", at least one of the characters probably agrees with you.
As a very little kid I assumed that's what happened - the driver "died" from the possession. But then again at 5 years old I was shown the film "heavy metal" and so I was pretty fucked up. But that was always my take. Have a nice day!
@@Level1Hera The best films have moments that give enough visual information for you to make up your own mind without explicitly stating what is happening. Then the viewer can interpret the situation in different ways, making it seem more personal to that viewer. Thanks. You have a nice day also.
***** We don't want to, that's what we're saying. Never said it was bad or anything as such, just that we don't want to spend money on a movie we're not interested in.
***** Listen you want to see the movie and support it, that's okay cause it;s your decision. You clearly like the movie and that's okay cause it's your opinion. Could you please respect other people's decisions and opinions?
It's so interesting to see at this age hear people talk about it as a comedy. I think I was about 6 years old when I saw the movie. For me it was a mix of a scary movie mixed with a superhero movie. I always had an inclination for scary movies but the reason why I could handle this at the early age I was, was exactly because of what Rich mentioned: the fought the ghosts on human terms thus taking away the super scary part and making it a story of heroism.
The Red Letter Media Guys are the only reviewers whose opinion I will trust on Ghostbusters 2016, as I don't suspect they can be bought. They have no issue telling it straight without sugar coating the truth and would probably expose Sony for trying to bribe them in true Jack and Jill form. While a lot of professional reviewers (even on some on CZcams) are trying to downplay how bad the film is, by issuing vague compliments like "I laughed throughout" Mike, Jay and the gang are going to be honest about it. So if they say it's good I might go see it. Not if it's "okay" or "so-so." or "funny but pointless" It has to be GOOD. Not even GREAT. It doesn't have to live up to the original. Nothing can. It has to be "The Force Awakens" good. Which is not THAT high a bar. If two or more of the RLM crew say it's good I'll probably go see it.
I can recite the first movie line-for-line, sound for sound, song for song....this movie has etched itself into my brain and will forever stay there. The Movies That Made Us did a great look into the production of Ghostbusters and the lightning in a bottle that it remains to this day.
The painting was creepy, but the story was lame, the script wasnt as witty and even the chemistry between them was a bit off; its like they were all thinking; didnt we do this before, only better?
Young people today have no idea what it felt like to watch this film in the 80's or early 90's before home internet, cell phones and mass media. It was such a different time and 1984-86 were just phenomenal in terms of all the great films that released. It really was a magical time to be a kid/teen.
1987 - Predator, Robocop, Planes Trains and Automobiles, Over the Top, Beverly Hills Cop 2, The Running Man, Mannequin, Masters of the Universe, and of course Death Wish 4 and Superman 4. The late 80s still had some great stuff.
Mike makes a very good point at 3:57. If the cast was Judd Apatow's rat-pack of goofy male actors such as Rogen, Hill and McBride, beating their low self-esteem style of humour, I would too still hate a Ghostbusters reboot.
Slimer was supposed to be the ghost of John Belushi. In the early, early development of the project, Bill Murray's character was to be played by Belushi, but of course he died. So Aykroyd created Slimer as an homage to his dead friend.
This is actually not true. Slimer was just a ghost, and it was later into development that they went and asked the designer of slimer to make some changes to make it look more like Belushi from animal house. The designer agreed, then changed nothing and gave it to them and they all said it reminded them of John so much.
I know this is old and nobody will see this, but... god help me, the empire state ghostbuster trap and a flying car would have been better than what we got. like by a lot.
The 80s. Always rebooted. Very, very badly. The 80s was simply the finest decade for movies, it's so sad that it appears the magic will never be captured again. Ghostbusters Aliens Star Wars The Terminator Robocop Predator Gremlins Raiders of the Lost Ark Back to the Future ET Beetlejuice Bladerunner The Lost Boys The Thing The Goonies ... What a decade. What a time to be a kid.
Shame on you ;) you forgot a lot: Short Circuit The Untouchables The Name of the Rose Friday the 13th Beverly Hills Cop Dead Poets Society When Harry met Sally Raging Bull Who Framed Roger Rabbit Platoon A Nightmare on Elm Street Full Metal Jacket Die Hard Caddyshack National Lampoon's Vacation Coming to America Poltergeist Stand by Me The Shining Ferris Bueller's Day Off Once upon a time in America Wall Street Trading Places Big Trouble in Litttle China Highlander Spaceballs Tron The Naked Gun A Fish called Wanda Das Boot Escape from New York Lethal Weapon Scarface Mad Max 2 The Blues Brothers
One thing I appreciate of the newer videos is the better use of compression on vocals These videos are pretty dang loudly mixed, compression wise. Still, amazing stuff.
Well..Ghostbusters The Video Game its basically the third movie, everyone was back and written by ramis and dan. And the story was actually way better than the second film
"He *wasn't so much a ghost* as he was a zombie. He was just a skeleton. It was just an undead skeleton, it *wasn't glowing or transparent.* " Mike's really learned a lot about ghosts from watching that Zach Baggins show, I'm impressed.
Mike is that friend that if you made music or films and he liked it you would feel like you finally made it.. something about him makes me respect his opinion
It’s that he does a genuinely good job at describing HIS feelings on a piece of work in addition to being on RLM, where he also speaks really eloquently with a sense of authority. In simpler terms, you know he knows how to analyze a work of art- even if you disagree with his analysis.
Feminists should hate the reboot, since it's the product of a cynical corporatist view that their entire movement is nothing more than a money teat to milk.
+Schoening91 Criticizing Feminism ≠ Hating Women That's a false-equivalence that you've drawn yourself, coupled with an ad hominem remark about his appearance I genuinely hope you were being sarcastic, because you sound like a _large, lumbering, logical-fallacy_
17:34 Rich's thoughts on cocaine goes to immediately smoking it in his example is telling of either not knowing cocaine use or he personally smokes cocaine. Interesting.
Jay really let himself go
Leave Susan alone, she's VERY sensitive.
She may be sensitive when on set; but down at the Manhole, it's a different story.
I think Susan is pregnant.
So did Josh.
It's Susan, you transphobic piece of shit!
0:55 "I suppose we should talk about the elephant in the room."
*Cuts to Rich*
I've watched this many times, I've never caught onto that editing joke, thank you.
Rich is the editor.
Mike can talk 🤣
Both of these guys are comparable to MM
Edit: by which I mean, Mike and Rich are obese. (I'm no Tom Cruise, either)
if i was called a prick by rich evans, i would put it in my resume as my finest achievement
I'd be so over the moon.
Does that depress you?
You mean you wouldn't spend three days making tearful Twitter videos crying about it and begging them to forgive you like that one prick?
@@DistractedGlobeGuy I watched Chris' entire saga and genuinely, literally thought it was a pretty funny parody, that they were basically parodying CZcamsr drama, because of how exaggeratedly whiny and unselfaware Chris was being, and because I had a decent amount of respect for him, I'd assumed they were on the same sarcasm level.
When the punch line never revealed itself, I had a "Oh....oh no... oh god oh no.." moment xD Lost all respect for him. What a prick. What a way to fulfill his own prophecy.
@@AtticusHimself what happen with Chris?
Dan akroyd referring to his children as “little beings” Is the greatest thing I’ve ever heard
It’s like a psychicpebbles line
You need to get out more.... Jk.
@@silentk59 aw, this would have been wonderful but this is a "Star" Featurette from 1999. I choose to believe it anyway!
He's like those stupid webcomics with the blue aliens that all talk like Commander Data.
Dan Aykroyd believes in everything... Seen ufos "three or four times", crystal skulls real, Samsquach probable, Loch Ness Monster totally not whaledick, crystals clean vodka etc. etc.
He's a trip.
Rich's throw away idea about the Empire State Building being a giant ghost trap and the engineers being the original Ghostbusters was ten times better than anything in Ghostbusters 2016.
shit, it was better than most of Ghostbusters 2
What are some of the great quotable lines from Ghostbusters 2016? Mike Hat? One Wanton? XD
That's because he ripped it off from a mid-catalogue Dario Argento movie called _Inferno._
Absolutely! That is a way cool idea.
@@danwest9900 _way_ cool!
We need a Ghostbusters reboot with Mike, Jay and Rich as the ghostbusters.
They already did. It was directed by Gilchrist. It was a disaster. A beautiful disaster
who's the fourth ghostbuster?
ho weijian Obviously Wizard!
***** no I mean who's the fourth guy on the team
You mean Ernie Hudson?
The scene where Ernie Hudson and Dan Akroyd discuss the end of the world sold the very real threat that differentiates the original from any other incarnation
I love that scene.
Also a solid Ernie Hudson scene: “The dead HAVE been rising from the grave.”
Ernie Hudson had some great line deliveries in the first one.
“If there’s a steady paycheck in it, I’ll believe anything you say.”
“When someone asks you if you’re a god, you say YES!”
Men In Black is the closest one which has worked to the GB formula.
@@mandatorycreativity I would argue the third movie was grounded for the MIB movies. It was goofy but heartfelt. IDK I liked the third one.
Why do so many people like MIB3? It was by far the worst of the series, in my opinion, way worse than even 2. MIB2 was stupid, but at least entertaining, funny, and actually had Tommy Lee Jones. Tommy Lee Jones is not in MIB3 enough, and didn't like the time travel plot, wish they didn't go with time travel.
I initially thought that the 3rd film was gonna be overkill. Why make a third? Then you see that Ending and BAM! That made it all worth it and brought that whole series full circle and made it a proper trilogy! Which I never saw coming or thought possible.
@@A-Dubs398 It's the pug.. no pug side-kick in No. 3 ...
@@jinvid To each his own, the ending of 3 was a cheesy ret-con to the 1st movie, in my opinion.
ironically, i feel like this channel is a vehicle for Mike to be sarcastic
Fortunately it fuels both.
It's a vehicle for him to be Bill Murray.
You just figured this out?!
What the fuck is "ironic" about that you goddamn lepton?
It's not ironic though, Alanis.
Thing about the original was that it was the result of a long relationship between the main players involved. Ramis, Reitman and Murray had just done stripes and these guys with Ackroyd had come through the live comedy scene together. The unique chemistry and comedy was a many year long relationship that can't possibly be recreated by just casting funny people with a clever script. Thats "corporate comedy" as they say.
Well, the same could be said about the new cast. McCarthy and Wiig were both in Bridesmaids which was directed by Paul Fieg. And Wiig, McKinnon, and Jones were all on SNL. So there should be a definite chemistry between of all them that they've built up. Of course it won't be as good as Ramis, Murray and Ackroyd but there should still be chemistry between the new actresses. But as far as the script... I have no idea because I haven't seen it yet.
It's not. McKinnon is just playing a clown (think Harpo Marx) who occasionally says something relevant as far as she built some gadget for them to bomb through ghosts without actually trapping them. Jones is the reactionary one whose knowledge of New York is never really that important. McCarthy is a either a shitty friend or is just petty/immature. And Wiig is her usual awkward therefore embarrassed by the awkward wet blanket. Kate and Melissa have a "kid and his clown" relationship, Kristen and Melissa have a minor tiff in the past relationship, Wiig and Kate have a WTF are you doing relationship in that direction, and Jones and Kate have a B.A. Baracus/Howling Mad Murdock from the A-Team movie relationship at times.
Bridesmaids is no Stripes dude! Also Ramis and Ackroyd WROTE the material that they were to ACT in Ghostbusters. (As well as Ramis having co written Stripes ). Ghostbusters evolved out of their intense years long relationship. This 2016 crew is taking those ideas and trying to make it work with completely different people. There's no comparison.
The new movie could work if they just chose some nice comedians and made it a sequel. Also the original Ghostbusters should be included again.
@@10FRANKTV Plus Harold Ramis and Dan Ackroyd are comedy WRITERS who had a unique and new vision. Paul Feig just had a pile of money thrown at him and was told to "twist this idea and make some fart jokes and we'll triple our money". What are some of the great quotable lines from Ghostbusters 2016? Mike Hat? One Wanton? Every crack?
You can see Mike starting to really tear up when he's talking about Harold Ramis.
He genuinely misses him 🥺
30:15
my "professional" opinion as an audio post production monkey is that Bill Murray saying "that's what I heard" is clearly ADR, but also fairly clear to be a match to his on-screen lip flap. So most likely scenario is that he really said it on set (probably as an ad lib) but he was off axis and everybody was yelling/scuffling, so they ADR'd it for clarity.
It could be as simple as making sure the audience doesn't say "wait what did he say?" and/or that the director / sound supervisor thought it was funny enough to salvage.
There's a scene in Heavy Metal during the Pentagon sketch where everyone is discussing the current threat but you can clearly hear John Candy say "very reassuring" several times... Takes me out of it lol
It was a Howard Hawke scene with a bunch of people talking over one another, the mic picking up the audio was in the room and Bill was being blocked by dickless. It's pretty basic stuff
Ghostbusters 2016=pixels with a ghostbusters logo slapped on it
That's pretty fucking accurate.
It's SONY! The same people who brought you quality products like Jack and Jill!
How many Sony VAIOs can YOU count in Ghostbuster 2016?
+deusEXmachinaV42 don't forget The Amazing Spider-Man 2
It's impossible to read your second sentence without hearing it said by Rich Evans :)
TJ Hastie
The Sinister Hack Fruad Six isn't going to happen now though.
I'm gonna reboot The Ghost Busters. Y'know, the one with the gorilla. He's gonna be CGI now.
Is he still gonna wear roller skates and have a magic hat?
+Handsome Hunk Hill Best Goddamn comment of the year.
+Aaron Carnes
Nah. The original is now 40 years old, it's a general rule of thumb that the mainstream doesn't really cares much for pop culture that is over 30-35 years old because the sensibilities of older media is viewed as being disjointed. At that point it's popularly regarded as "old people's" things, and like old people, the mainstream and the media companies that feed them will cease to give that any attention.
Who ever talks about ragtime music, vaudeville, Charlie Chaplin, Gone with the Wind, Frank Sinatra, Tom and Jerry, Buddy Holly, 60s Hanna Barbara cartoons, the Brady Bunch, M*A*S*H or C.H.I.P.S. anymore? And when they do try (I'm looking at you, the Three Stooges and John Carter), it's makes it out lukewarm because the current generation doesn't "get it".
CarbonWaterCalcium The point is most pop culture that had been past its prime would still be held up by nostalgia for up to 40-something years, usually by people who grew up with it up until they reach their seniority and are no longer profitable to media companies to exploit wholly. This is true for most modern remakes of lesser but more recent pop culture, like the 1990s Brady Bunch movie, the 1990s and 2000s Knight Rider shows, the 2005 Dukes of Hazzard, the new Hawaii Five-0, the 2000s Garfield movies, the...ugh...Jem movie...
Even disregarding the obscurity of the show due to being overshadowed by the 1984 Ghostbusters, the opportunity to remake the 1970s Ghost Busters has past that expiry date of nostalgia years back and would likely fall out of the radar quick if it was ever made.
Daniel Woods Of course.
When Ray says ‘Hey Dean Yeager!’ he’s happy, excited and surprised. He’s a big puppy with good news to share. To my mind Dan Aykroyds delivery was spot on.
Rich Evans' desription of the Mandela Effect is perfect.
Yeah, he came up with a perfect explanation on the fly. Impressive. Most impressive.
I SWEAR when I watched this in 2016 he gave a slightly different description.
@@LosBerkos or maybe you remember them talking about the mandela effect in the re:view of demolition man
@@LosBerkos truly lol
It's actually Mandala Effect.
The Ghostbusters 2009 video game is not only the closest thing to a 3rd movie, it is really good and I recommend playing it if you never have.
Should be noted that the story was almost entirely the game devs. The "this is gb3 as a game!" was marketing nonsense.
@@roberte2945 oh nothing, I just think people overstate the link with the first two and it's often disappointing for people who get the game and don't think the humour works as well. That was why I specified. I personally love the game.
Omg that game was my childhood! I remember having it on the Nintendo lite console and having a really hard time trapping the ghosts for some reason
With all of the people out there on You Tube, shouting angrily about how much they love the original Ghostbusters, I think this video contains some of the most sincere and heartfelt statements about why the original is so beloved.
Good on you. Thank you.
Ray backing away with his mouth hanging slack and the cigarette stuck to his bottom lip. Just one of many awesome moments in that freaking perfect movie.
Rewatching just for the Stuckman insult in the beginning. He cried so much about that. Very entertaining.
You can *see* Bill Murray saying "Well that's what I heard"
I agree it does look that way, but it does sound like ADR also. I would guess they had poor audio and re did it in ADR. Also, I don't think sounding "gay" is something most comedians would care about, just that their act is funny.
I think they show that clip to show that he does infact say it and proves mike wrong
@Eoghan Look at some of Eddie Murphy's stand up from the time
@@Wynaut22 mike edited it, shows he has some humility lol
This one is a stretch, Bill Murray clearly said something and the dialogue matches. If they ADRed over it I would think it was to cover something a little too edgy.
The fact that Jeremy Jahns and Chris Stuckmann both have more subscribers than RLM is baffling
thats why they're taking lame potshots at them.
It's called a joke, they clearly have no ill intent.
Theyre more accessible, RLM has a very nihilistic, deadpan kind of humor in which nothing questionable is acknowledged (ex. the latest wheel of the worst had the joke where its implied that mike is hallucinating that those two canadian guys were there, the random cast changes at the end). there's also some fucked up jokes in the plinkett reviews, its just not something the average person looking up "ghostbusters review" would want to watch. The ReView series kind of seems to be acknowledging that, its much less RLM type humor and more of two guys talking
Maybe that's because they produce shorter videos that don't take as long to watch
Ive never heard of them ....
"I think we're going to refrain from talking about Ghostbusters 2" *Immediately begins talking about Ghostbusters 2*
"The franchise rights alone will make us rich beyond our wildest dreams" base a sequel on this line.
"As they say, black don't crack" "??????" I'm dying xD
"As they say, blacks smoke crack." - Mike.
+X5R jay: black don't smoke crack?
mike: what?
awkward edit
As they say "Black does crack"
X5R grabs popcorn
X5R hands back popcorn O.O
I just started watching RLM maybe two weeks ago. I've already binged watched almost every Half in the Bag already. Thank Christ for an upload!
Watch best of the worst and Star Wars reviews or else most of the comments aren't going to make sense
Watch all the Plinkett Star Wars reviews. That's how I originally found RLM. That's what made them popular.
Or any of the plinkett reviews, that's how all of us started, haha. Nowadays my favorites are Wheel of the Worst, Best of the worst by far.
I remember when I first found these dudes, binge watching for two weeks straight... The good thing is that they continuously upload quality content and have multiple outlets. Check out redlettermedia.bandcamp.com to listen to complete movie reviews (audio). They have tons of content and the shows are getting better and better. It's a good time to be on Team Green! The Wizard Rules!
Watch BOTW and WOTW. They oughta hold you for a week.
"I collect spores, molds, and fungus"
RIP H. Ramis. 💔
Isn't that a Rich Evans quote?
I think the first Men in Black pulls off the concept. A mundane day in a job that involves something sci-fi / supernatural.
21:28 "When John Lennon got shot" and it's a picture of Ringo. Hilarious!!
I'm wondering if these guys realize that the Ghostbusters video game was a collaboration between the original cast and the game developers. Dan A. brought the story and it was basically Ghostbusters 3.
Mike doesn't like video games, but I'm sure Rich is well aware.
Rich knows he's talked about it on the Pre Rec streams on Twitch.
fireflocs Ooh, Rich and Jack would beg to differ.
I think I'm going to play through it again soon, it will always be Ghostbuster 3 to me.
Mathew Moody i love that game
25:34 "it might be fine"... Was extremely generous optimism by Rich.
"well that's what I heard" fits so well into Murray's character. It's something a kid would say. It's one of my favorite lines from this infinitely quotable perfect film.
I agree lol
For some reason my family would spin the " no human would stack books this way" line. I.e., "No human would wrap a present this way" or " No .....drive a car this way " .
Sorry, just randomly added this and I also agree with your comment lol
Is Re:view replacing Max Landis on Best of the Worst?!!
Those hack frauds are just trying to get views because there's a new lady Ghostbusters out.
Is Harry Plinkett replacing Paul Feig?
No, just his hair.
Nothing can replace Gamestation 2.0
Jack's laugh replaced Game Station 2.0. I need help deciding which one it was though.
Was it "ah, ah, ah, ah, ah, ah, ah" or was it "AAAH, ah, ah, ah, ah, ah, ah, ah?"
Man this Statler and Waldorf reboot is gritty AF
'Slimer' was loosely based on John Belushi - especially his character John 'Bluto' Blutarsky from 1978's Animal House. Originally, Dan Aykroyd wrote the Peter Venkman character with Belushi in mind, but he sadly passed away in 1982 and was therefore replaced by Bill Murray. Belushi's spirit was kept alive with Slimer.
I like to think of Rich is still friends with Mike years from now on his deathbed he'll say "see I was right I said you were going to die"
Slimer = the ghost of John Belushi
When I first heard that it made Slimer make total sense.
holy cow, that's not wrong. My goodness.
Slimer was terrifying tbh.
@Suffer No Fools lol
Ironically the guy who designed slimer, had the Dan and the director come down and asked him to make slimer look like John Belushi. So he said yeah thats a great idea. Ignored it completely and just gave them the same design again, and both said, it looks just like him.
Awwww! That amazing moment at 21:20 when Mike gets emotional as he remembers the great Harold Ramis. I agree with you Mike, there will never be another Harold Ramis. He was a NOBLE person, a great human being.
Rest in Peace, Harold. We will always remember you.
@@alexshadowfax1119 he wrote and directed Groundhog Day and Caddyshack etc
I’ve never been a huge fan of Caddyshack but have always respected not only the performances but the film as a whole. Groundhog Day is an amazing movie that never gets old. Ghostbusters how ever was the first movie I saw. I was born in 1985 and Ghostbusters was my first love. I grew up watching it over and over again. All my babysitters would tell my mom, “all he wants to do is watch Ghostbusters.” In 1989 Ghostbusters 2 came out and it fell right into the rotation. It wasn’t till I was older that I found out that Ghostbusters 2 isn’t as highly regarded as the first. To me, it is just as good. I loved all of the Ghostbusters but my favorite was Peter. Bill Murray stole the show every time! That is, until again I was older and I started to pick up on things in the ghostbusters movies that I hadn’t noticed. Even though I had seen them thousands of times. The subtle way Egon feeds the prices to Peter at the hotel. Egon scanning Daina after telling her Peter never talks about her. Egon trying to laugh like a human in the courtroom (Ha-haha). Ramis was a genius at subtle comedic timing. Egon has been my favorite Ghostbuster for sometime now. Now Ramis steals the show ever time and yes, I still watch both Ghostbusters movies all the time. It’s like family.
Ya, so perfect. I don't believe Melisa Mccarthy could build a proton pack. I do believe Egon could lol.
The ADR line "well thats what I heard" was something Bill Murray improvised and later in production the audio was most likely put in the forefront of the rabble in the scene making it sound ADR
On the "that's what I heard" line - you can see him in the background behind Walter Peck saying it. Also, in the 30 years since I saw it in the theater, I have never ever thought "this man has no dick" meant it was because Bill Murray's character saw him naked. I think someone is overthinking it.
Yeah, this is the ONLY thing about Ghostbusters Mike is mistaken about. Why? Because it makes the joke weak.
So why does Venkman do it? Because he's dealing with a politician, trying to convince him that Peck is dangerous and wrong-headed, regardless of his political power. He deftly pokes Peck about his [pickled] pecker in an effort to set him off and make him appear to be the unreasonable one. The Mayor doesn't like Peck but he likes votes more than the Ghostbusters. So Venkman swallows his pride and backs off his burn as soon as Peck goes off, to appear conciliatory to the Major, and not a recalcitrant jackass whom the major can't work with.
What rises to the level of allowing Venkman to swallow his outsized pride? Saving The City. Because neither Ray nor Egon - despite their massive intellects - have the ability to persuade the Major at this critical juncture.
I suspect Mike has little use for politicians and their War on Humor.
This I think is where Mike reveals that he is ultimately a geek, and not the normal sort of guy he'd like to be believed to be. The blue collar guys I hang out with would make this joke off the cuff, without anyone stopping to ask if he'd actually seen the other naked.
I agree but it kind of sounds like the line was AVR'd, however, to me it seemed like an ad-lib of Bill Murray's comedic gift. The 'no dick' line got a lot of laughs, then the guy starts a fight which was also funny, and then Bill Murray wraps the scene up with a bow with another amusing line. It never seemed to me like he said it due to worry about sounding gay.
@@magonus195 Well we know Mike played DnD in high school so he's definitely not the "everyman" he might think that everyone thinks he is.
I always thought he was responding to Peck yelling at him " I have no dick? How dare you... Blah blah, hoighty toighty snotty Peck line. Was I imagining all that?! Bet my 7 yo mind was obsessed by the willy remark!
To me the entire joke is that they're blue collar exterminators (mundane) who capture ghosts (fantastical) and talk about it like it's a day job. That's it.
Wow, not only was Ghostbusters and Gremlins released on the same week, but they were released on the same day!
June 8th, 1984 is one of the greatest days to have ever gone to a movie theater.
Ghost Busters, Karate Kid, Temple of Doom, Gremlins, Search for Spock.. Summer of 84 was incredible!
To bad gremlins doesnt has a third live actions movie
21:34 I'm not sure if it's the same formula, but Men in Black worked. Same type of humor and aliens instead of ghosts.
Hellboy in 2004 as well.
That opening joke made Chris Stuckmann cry lol
Beta male 🤣
@@spotted9106 And yet he's happily married with his gorgeous wife. Yeah, "so beta"...
@@jackcinephile7554 If a married man is pushed to tears by a middle-aged man on the internet calling him a prick, he has other problems to work out
It's so weird because I'm pretty sure Stuckmann wasn't definitely what Rich was referring to. I would personally say it's the middle guy, but because he's more well-known CZcams "movie guy" he's referring to Jeremy Jahns. I don't think he even was being mean but just teasing them anyway.
"This is Spinal Tap" is the most quoteable movie of all time of course.
Agree, what a good movie
That movie fuckin sucks
I think "Blues Brothers" has the most quotable lines. But this is a subjective debate.
@@woodsplitter3274
"Hi, this is car um...What number are we?"
> "Five-five."
"Car 55. Um... we're in a truck!"
@@g.waldmeister1851 "how often does the train go by?
"So often you won't even notice it."
I don't know why, the lines are so quotable.
Is this replacing Nostalgia Critic?
No, I think they said its replacing Irate Gamer.
+pezhead53 Really? Originally I thought they were replacing Lost...
+Tom Lintin they are Mike and Riche are dead this is a dream
Well, except for Demo Reel. That was somehow much, much worse.
We can only hope.
As a kid when Ray yells "aim for the flat top!" during the Goza fight, I thought he was talking about the platform she was standing on?? Which didnt make sense to me. Now I know he meant her head lol
“ We had part of a slinky once but I straightened it”
A couple of my favourite bits of this movie are the subtle bits of comedy from Bill Murray and Harold Ramis as Egon and Peter try to scam people. First with the real estate agent as Egon takes Peter's arm in a sign that he's in on trying to argue the price down, and second with the hotel manager as Egon signals how much money Peter should charge them for. It's wonderful.
I've watched this movie dozens of times and I never noticed the pricing thing with Egon's fingers in the hotel! How did I miss that!? Love this movie.
"She's a dog" was actually a very expository line. It showed you how hurt Venkman was when he saw what happened. Saying that was his way of coping with it, you can see it in his face. It was one of the stronger lines in the movie if you ask me, no joke just real feeling.
There was a Ghostbusters 3 of sorts with the Xbox 360 Ghostbusters game featuring the original cast members - and its bloody fantastic. It’s as close as we got to a third film.
Thank you so much for reminding me of my a childhood memory I'd long forgotten. As a kid I totally couldn't understand Ray's "Hey, Dean Yeager!" line either. Took me years to figure out what the hell he was saying... or perhaps when we got a TV with closed captions.
"I can't wait to see Melissa McCarthy fart out ectoplasm"
LOL!
Oh my god, bring us the Plinkett and the Force Awakens review
+iNuchalHead
I like your theory.
Rich and Mike now need to do a Re:View on Temple of Doom! Would love to see it
Congrats
The line might have been re-done in ADR because it wasn't clear enough with all the other actors talking but you can clearly see his lips when he says the line and it matches up.
Glad you explained this so I didn't have to. :) (I get why, without looking at the video, he might think it was ADR.)
I see these Bears, but wheres the Twink?
lmao
Jays an otter you hack
>twinks
What are you? A fucking normie?
+Juan Valencia You've got your profile pic as yourself, that's normie as hell
According to this morning's video it would be a Twink thirty-five feet long weighing approximately six-hundred pounds. You can see it sitting in the chair on the right-hand side. I mean left. I mean both.
Stantz / Aykroyd is the believer. He looks at everything wide-eyed. Both the character and the actor live the reality of the film.
Spenger / Ramis is the brains. He's restrained, looking at it all from a rational point of view. He's an enabler. Both the character (as a scientist) and the actor (as a filmmaker) are there to pivot between the others, make things work.
Venkman / Murray is the cynic. To him, the whole thing is just a big joke. The actor is constantly banging against the fourth wall; the character would break it if he was self-aware.
Zeddmore / Hudson is the everyman. He looks at the whole thing as an outsider. Both as a character and as an actor, he's just happy to be there.
Regardless of what you think of a premise like "four guys with nuclear accelerators, chasing ghosts around New York", at least one of the characters probably agrees with you.
The ghost that entered the cab turned the driver into a zombie. Now that's dark.
I always thought the ghost went in the cab and was the zombie
As a very little kid I assumed that's what happened - the driver "died" from the possession. But then again at 5 years old I was shown the film "heavy metal" and so I was pretty fucked up. But that was always my take. Have a nice day!
@@Level1Hera The best films have moments that give enough visual information for you to make up your own mind without explicitly stating what is happening. Then the viewer can interpret the situation in different ways, making it seem more personal to that viewer.
Thanks. You have a nice day also.
This is the video that made Chris stuckman cry.
Hey! I love Jeremy Jahns! FU BRO! Prepare to be DOXED and SWATED!
IKR? Fuck these hack frauds, this video lacks obnoxious and mindless jump cuts!
Ps: I love you, Ralph...
There he iz!
Nobody likes you
thefatman69fude Is he a great critic? I don't think so.
Love him too, and Chris, laughed anyway.
Not wasting my money on the new Ghostbusters, anyone else have the same plan?
SomethingGodAwful Good plan, you're going places.
+Rob C While terrible movies can be entertaining, they are never worth any money.
***** We don't want to, that's what we're saying. Never said it was bad or anything as such, just that we don't want to spend money on a movie we're not interested in.
***** Listen you want to see the movie and support it, that's okay cause it;s your decision. You clearly like the movie and that's okay cause it's your opinion. Could you please respect other people's decisions and opinions?
+Rob C THE SALT
It's so interesting to see at this age hear people talk about it as a comedy. I think I was about 6 years old when I saw the movie. For me it was a mix of a scary movie mixed with a superhero movie. I always had an inclination for scary movies but the reason why I could handle this at the early age I was, was exactly because of what Rich mentioned: the fought the ghosts on human terms thus taking away the super scary part and making it a story of heroism.
Watched it. Cinema Southport, England. In 86 ..happy days x
The Red Letter Media Guys are the only reviewers whose opinion I will trust on Ghostbusters 2016, as I don't suspect they can be bought. They have no issue telling it straight without sugar coating the truth and would probably expose Sony for trying to bribe them in true Jack and Jill form. While a lot of professional reviewers (even on some on CZcams) are trying to downplay how bad the film is, by issuing vague compliments like "I laughed throughout" Mike, Jay and the gang are going to be honest about it.
So if they say it's good I might go see it. Not if it's "okay" or "so-so." or "funny but pointless" It has to be GOOD. Not even GREAT. It doesn't have to live up to the original. Nothing can. It has to be "The Force Awakens" good. Which is not THAT high a bar. If two or more of the RLM crew say it's good I'll probably go see it.
They are hack frauds. It's not a matter of they CAN'T be bought, it's that no studio would waste their money that badly.
Wait do you really think most reviews are bought or something?
How sad.
+Artur CalDazar Yeah WB just got in trouble TODAY for doing it. Google Warner Bros PewDiePie Reviews. It happens alot.
Most reviews don't come in youtube lets play format though.
It's a cash-in remake of a classic property. If they don't hate it, I'll be immensely surprised (and blame it on Mike being a hack fraud.)
The most quotable movies of all time are probably Clue, Airplane, and Monty Python and the Holy Grail, but Ghostbusters is probably up there
I picked the wrong day to stop sniffing glue
and leon's getting llllarger
And Aliens.
"Screw you, I work for Mel Brooks!"
Army of Darkness
"I love the traps" - Mike Stoklasa 2016
I can recite the first movie line-for-line, sound for sound, song for song....this movie has etched itself into my brain and will forever stay there. The Movies That Made Us did a great look into the production of Ghostbusters and the lightning in a bottle that it remains to this day.
Where's the other guy?
Hey buddy wanna play some Sven Coop?
Today it's Mike and the other other guy
He is replaced with other other guy.
He got blasted by 100,000 revenants. AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!
I think she's pregnant.
I wonder how Skeptic is feeling about his senpai noticing him
Interrogative: who/what are "skeptic" and "senpai"?
skeptic => armoured skeptic, a youtube channel
senpai => roughly translates into mentor
Brainhorn You're on the spectrum aren't you?
Brainhorn That was not a meme lol.
Brainhorn No, it's a phrase we teachers use to describe socially defunct students.
Is it weird it took me a year to learn about that Stuckman thing?
What is it?
@Redresseny He was crying that rlm called him asshole.
TUMS FESTIVAL Wow! I like Stuckmann fine enough but that’s pretty silly of him. Although, I don’t see that video on his main channel.
Daniel 1234 he posted it to his facebook
That librarian scared the shit out of me when I was a kid.
The fact that they got pissed off just shows that Rich was right.
Haha.. When Stuckmann sees this, he'll record a 30min video about how upset he is.. and probably, he'll almost cry... Love U guys
Naah.. I mean, they did a whole video about Max Landis And Len Kabizinski.. but this was a hint.. A clever hint
He removed RLM from his recommended channel list. Buuut, thats it.
Huh? for real?
James Eagles Yeah, they're gone
Oh.. poor Chris.. He must be so upset
My buddy and I saw this and Gremlins during same trip to the theater in 1984. That was quite a day for a couple of 13 year olds.
Ghost Busters II is fine. Especially Yonosh. Command me lord!
Everything you do is bad. I want you to know this.
I enjoyed GB2
Whereas GB1 was a vehicle for Bill Murray's Peter Venkman, GB2 is a vehicle for Peter McNicol's Janosz Poha
I love Ghostbusters 2
The painting was creepy, but the story was lame, the script wasnt as witty and even the chemistry between them was a bit off; its like they were all thinking; didnt we do this before, only better?
Is this replacing Previously Recorded?!
I'm guessing you don't watch the prerec streams, sundays and wednesdays on Twitch com
No. It's replacing HitB
+Raif Nation they said in the first episode its not replacing hitb
+Mazin Omer reverse psychology! Ever heard about that? Huuuuuuuuh?
Young people today have no idea what it felt like to watch this film in the 80's or early 90's before home internet, cell phones and mass media. It was such a different time and 1984-86 were just phenomenal in terms of all the great films that released. It really was a magical time to be a kid/teen.
Indeed. Turned 13 the year when this came out. Best time for genre films and to be a kid watching them.
1987 - Predator, Robocop, Planes Trains and Automobiles, Over the Top, Beverly Hills Cop 2, The Running Man, Mannequin, Masters of the Universe, and of course Death Wish 4 and Superman 4. The late 80s still had some great stuff.
How was it walking home from school having to hide from pterodactyls
"Shhh...listen...you smell that?"
Mike makes a very good point at 3:57. If the cast was Judd Apatow's rat-pack of goofy male actors such as Rogen, Hill and McBride, beating their low self-esteem style of humour, I would too still hate a Ghostbusters reboot.
"Well there's something you don't see every day."
I'm half-watching this video and burst out laughing at that little clip.
Slimer was supposed to be the ghost of John Belushi. In the early, early development of the project, Bill Murray's character was to be played by Belushi, but of course he died. So Aykroyd created Slimer as an homage to his dead friend.
What a disgusting blob!!
This is actually not true. Slimer was just a ghost, and it was later into development that they went and asked the designer of slimer to make some changes to make it look more like Belushi from animal house. The designer agreed, then changed nothing and gave it to them and they all said it reminded them of John so much.
Hes a disgusting little spud, isnt he? a glowing tribute
0:27 the joke that broke 🅱hris 🆘tuckmanns brain and made him go on an unhindged rant for 6 minutes 11seconds
I know this is old and nobody will see this, but... god help me, the empire state ghostbuster trap and a flying car would have been better than what we got. like by a lot.
20 seconds in and it's already the best episode ever.
"Black don't crack" -Mike Stoklasa
Janine said that because she was trying to get him to hold her. She was coming on to him the whole time and he was completely oblivious.
Perfect cast for Ghostbusters: Mike, Jay, Ritch, Will Smith.
oo thats hot thats hot
Is Will Smith going to play Louis Tulley?
Famous CZcamsr Will Smith. And Mark Ass Brownie
The Canadians as Louis (they're like the Mothra fairies) and James Earl Jones as Winston.
MagmaVision Macully Culkin as the secretary
The 80s. Always rebooted. Very, very badly. The 80s was simply the finest decade for movies, it's so sad that it appears the magic will never be captured again.
Ghostbusters
Aliens
Star Wars
The Terminator
Robocop
Predator
Gremlins
Raiders of the Lost Ark
Back to the Future
ET
Beetlejuice
Bladerunner
The Lost Boys
The Thing
The Goonies
...
What a decade. What a time to be a kid.
I mean, we can pick 15-20 great movies from any decade. The 80s had a LOOOOOTTT of crap too. Let's not forget that in our nostalgia.
Shame on you ;) you forgot a lot:
Short Circuit
The Untouchables
The Name of the Rose
Friday the 13th
Beverly Hills Cop
Dead Poets Society
When Harry met Sally
Raging Bull
Who Framed Roger Rabbit
Platoon
A Nightmare on Elm Street
Full Metal Jacket
Die Hard
Caddyshack
National Lampoon's Vacation
Coming to America
Poltergeist
Stand by Me
The Shining
Ferris Bueller's Day Off
Once upon a time in America
Wall Street
Trading Places
Big Trouble in Litttle China
Highlander
Spaceballs
Tron
The Naked Gun
A Fish called Wanda
Das Boot
Escape from New York
Lethal Weapon
Scarface
Mad Max 2
The Blues Brothers
Temple of Doom was my favorite as a kid
Temple is the best one.
It's a very fresh and fun adventure, not that heavy historical nazi stuff of the first and third one.
Temple and Raiders are tied for me. Such great fucking movies
saloram maloram!!!
Just saw all of them Temple of Doom was the worst super over rated you guys need to re watch it again up to date 2018
One thing I appreciate of the newer videos is the better use of compression on vocals
These videos are pretty dang loudly mixed, compression wise. Still, amazing stuff.
2022 here
Well..Ghostbusters The Video Game its basically the third movie, everyone was back and written by ramis and dan. And the story was actually way better than the second film
"He *wasn't so much a ghost* as he was a zombie. He was just a skeleton. It was just an undead skeleton, it *wasn't glowing or transparent.* "
Mike's really learned a lot about ghosts from watching that Zach Baggins show, I'm impressed.
21:34 I'd argue that Three Amigos used the Ghostbusters formula succesfully two years later in 1986.
Mike is that friend that if you made music or films and he liked it you would feel like you finally made it.. something about him makes me respect his opinion
It’s that he does a genuinely good job at describing HIS feelings on a piece of work in addition to being on RLM, where he also speaks really eloquently with a sense of authority.
In simpler terms, you know he knows how to analyze a work of art- even if you disagree with his analysis.
Cash grabs and feminism are very closely related.
and we call that Prostitution
wish I can go back in time and stop feminism from inventing women
Feminists should hate the reboot, since it's the product of a cynical corporatist view that their entire movement is nothing more than a money teat to milk.
+Schoening91 Criticizing Feminism ≠ Hating Women
That's a false-equivalence that you've drawn yourself, coupled with an ad hominem remark about his appearance
I genuinely hope you were being sarcastic, because you sound like a _large, lumbering, logical-fallacy_
TRIGGERED
17:34 Rich's thoughts on cocaine goes to immediately smoking it in his example is telling of either not knowing cocaine use or he personally smokes cocaine. Interesting.
There is no middleground on this
Fascinating to watch Mike not being sarcastic. I love these re:Views
armored skeptic lol