Finally someone who delved into a bit more of the nitty gritty about the protocol. Every other video is just the glazed over "everything will work together". Okay... But I would like to know a little more about HOW. Great video.
Great Video. I have one suggestion for you please make one detailed play-list on Matter because I think in future it will very effective and also people are interested on it.
Very nice! Good basic starting point. I'm really wanting to set out to make a small client library that can discover and control various matter wifi devices, but I find it nearly impossible to find any good documentation on how to do this and where to get started. Yes there are a couple very platform specific implementations, but if they don't support the platform I want to use, I'm basically hosed, and the platform support so far is extremely limited (they don't even have a Windows build)
Indeed. Currently Linux, Mac, iOS, Android are supported to build matter controller to discover and control matter devices. Windows support is missing. You can try raspberry-pi/Android/iOS if any of those is an option for you.
@@pgnemo made some tiny bit of progress playing with DNS-SD and can find the TP-Link plug and understand what kind of device it is. Still far cry from actually talking to the device though. Been going through the ~900 page doc back and forth as well slowly building knowledge and chipping away. It feels overly complicated
@@pgnemo The ESP32 H2 supports Matter and comes with a Matter SDK and also end devices already preloaded with the code so they can just wire up and work. They also have a bridge router and all certified too.
Matter isn't really any simpler than any other zwave or zigbee device. Once you buy the initial hub and pair it to Alexa, google or Apple, everything pairs fairly quickly and easily. Friends dont let friends buy non-matter Wifi crap.
but that setup is not a single step less than the setup going with the bosch system? why would i care about amazon or google when I decided to go with bosch? what i find frustrating is the not clear comunication that i would need a bsh gen 2 plug to repeat matter, but a gen 1 to repeat zigbee. and gen 1 gets less and less available. also with bsh and openhab, both work totally offline locally - so where is the benefit?
The trend is that all major manufactures have adopted Matter, so we are expecting to see one single open ecosystem (vs. locked down by different ecosystems when you buy devices from different manufactures). So no matter what brand it is, the setup process is very similar and you can use the same Matter controller app to do the setup. VS. multiple apps/ different setup process for the devices by different manufactures. I think the main difference is Matter protocol is open and is being widely adopted.
As a smart home devices manufacture here, we are looking forward to Matter, it is really amazing!
Finally someone who delved into a bit more of the nitty gritty about the protocol. Every other video is just the glazed over "everything will work together". Okay... But I would like to know a little more about HOW.
Great video.
I just started my journey on researching IOT and your video was by far the best. Also, you have the gift of humor, well done. Thanks!
Bro...keep it up. Niche is the way to grow and as a product dev manager I really appreciate you're work! Thank you, and subbed!
Informative but the music makes listening painful😬
Thank you for providing insights into Matter Protocol.
Great Video.
I have one suggestion for you please make one detailed play-list on Matter because I think in future it will very effective and also people are interested on it.
You also read the application clusters pdf and device library pdf as well 😁
That background music is really annoying! 🙉
Very nice! Good basic starting point. I'm really wanting to set out to make a small client library that can discover and control various matter wifi devices, but I find it nearly impossible to find any good documentation on how to do this and where to get started. Yes there are a couple very platform specific implementations, but if they don't support the platform I want to use, I'm basically hosed, and the platform support so far is extremely limited (they don't even have a Windows build)
Indeed. Currently Linux, Mac, iOS, Android are supported to build matter controller to discover and control matter devices. Windows support is missing. You can try raspberry-pi/Android/iOS if any of those is an option for you.
@@pgnemo made some tiny bit of progress playing with DNS-SD and can find the TP-Link plug and understand what kind of device it is. Still far cry from actually talking to the device though. Been going through the ~900 page doc back and forth as well slowly building knowledge and chipping away. It feels overly complicated
Nice progress already ! Indeed some manufacturers already have Matter enabled.
This is a great idea. 👍
@@pgnemo The ESP32 H2 supports Matter and comes with a Matter SDK and also end devices already preloaded with the code so they can just wire up and work. They also have a bridge router and all certified too.
great content! Looking forward to next one
Nice work
Thanks!
can you explain how matter generate QR code and manual code via vendor ID and product ID or somethings like that?
Thank you. But please lower the music volume in the video.
What happens when your phone and the appliance are not on the same network?
you move the screen around so much i had to hit mute before i got dizzy
Matter isn't really any simpler than any other zwave or zigbee device. Once you buy the initial hub and pair it to Alexa, google or Apple, everything pairs fairly quickly and easily. Friends dont let friends buy non-matter Wifi crap.
but that setup is not a single step less than the setup going with the bosch system? why would i care about amazon or google when I decided to go with bosch?
what i find frustrating is the not clear comunication that i would need a bsh gen 2 plug to repeat matter, but a gen 1 to repeat zigbee. and gen 1 gets less and less available.
also with bsh and openhab, both work totally offline locally - so where is the benefit?
The trend is that all major manufactures have adopted Matter, so we are expecting to see one single open ecosystem (vs. locked down by different ecosystems when you buy devices from different manufactures). So no matter what brand it is, the setup process is very similar and you can use the same Matter controller app to do the setup. VS. multiple apps/ different setup process for the devices by different manufactures.
I think the main difference is Matter protocol is open and is being widely adopted.
@@pgnemo yeah i totally did not hear that 20 times already.
time will tell if this time it realy gets delivered, not just promised.
Take IoT out of the cloud and into privacy protected home servers
If only devices open source their firmware