Thank you for this. It is very interesting. I feel the main underlying cause of the civil wars, was that much of England especially in the south east, were no longer 'feudal' in structure, but had become much more complex with merchants, businesses, tradesmen, couriers, deliverymen and the like. Many failed to see the need for an absolute monarch, which no longer could effectively rule such a complex society, and thus in practice became less connected if not irrelevant. Parliament with all its committees could address the nations needs more effectively, but as you stated Parliament was denied that voice during the so called 11 years personal rule. What you say of course happened, but the resulting clashes were symptoms of this deeper underlying cause of inability to govern effectively. On another note, the number of men who died in the war is nearly as much as British people who died in the second World War. It is sad, that this bloody period of English history is not taught in our schools, even because of its relevance to the rise of Parliamentary democracy.
Charles wanted an autocracy and free reign to do as he saw fit. He truly believed that god bestowed leadership upon him and Parliament was the hinderance to him ruling as such. William Prynne recognised the king acting in such manner and overstepping his statutory bounds and John Hampden, who was MP for Buckinghamshire (if you don't know where it is please look it up - we're nowhere near the sea) rightly, stood up to him by refusing to raise the tax from his constituents. Charles had options available to him and chose to imprison and martyr John Hampden to save his own pride in the short term, which added to Hampdens later fame and lore once he died at the ambush at Chalgrove. Thomas Jefferson cites Hampden as one of his influences, amongst many other dissenters who've challenged authority since. The civil war was taught when I went to school at least (I hope it still is) and coming from a place where John Hampden lived, makes it all the more salient and important. And evermore relevant in todays social and political landscape. What we have lost is holding truth to power (irrespective of what side of the political fence you sit on, it's the same whether right or left) exacerbated by the indifference our elected officials value of our opinions and concerns, vs that of businesses and their lobbyists and the general malaise, apathy and disinterest most of us display in how we are now governed.
Cheers! Thank u from across the pond. As a citizen of thecUS, I enjoyed your history chat. I aldo lived 6 months in the UK many years ago. History is something we all need to learn and appreciate.
POV: You are tryna make notes and your still half way through writing the first one and she's already said 200 different thing and you're gonna have to watch it like 20 times.
Excellent summary - technically, there were 3 English civil wars but they often get referred to in the singular, probably because they occurred within a relatively short period of time (
You are mistaken; Britain did exist, as did Great Britain. They are geographical features, not countries. The name 'English' Civil War also isn't much accurate, though it is the popular name; Scotland and Ireland were each heavily involved in the three wars, particularly Scotland. That's why a lot of modern historians prefer the name 'Wars of the Three Kingdoms' or 'British Civil Wars' over the more inaccurate, if more popular, 'English Civil War'.
Well articulated. One thing that might be added was that Cromwell's personal animosity toward the Crown was a result of the presumed bastardization of the Crown long before Charles I was crowned. "If the King desires to be regarded as King by Parliament, asserting the Divine Right of Privilege, then the King must be the Divine King!" I can almost hear Cromwell yelling over objection. In short, the problem was that Charles I asserted "the divine right of Kings" but was not the divine king -- the Bastard was. And the Bastard was in the New World and had been the host of the "First Thanksgiving" no matter what Honest Abe Lincoln's influence on history books has claimed when creating the covering holiday to commemorate a perverted explanation of what happened. What Charles did by chartering the New England Company to John Winthrop in 1629 was to violate a long established treaty with the New World by pretending the treaty did not exist -- in exchange for cash. Oops. Cromwell objected. John Winthrop, in the new world, did not object. For obvious reasons.
What good for a Monarchy if the sovereignty is to be shared with people representatives ( Subjects to the King and Crown if I may add ) ? Does this not the rule and principle of Monarchy ?
That was the big question.Along with whether England was Catholic or Protestant. Finally settled with William and Mary. We also have the Protestant succession written into law. Don't ignore the impact of the Reformation.
To those unhappy the young lady and the speed she's talking at your question is in the title 🙄 it's 5 minutes not 10 thought she did remarkably well in the time she was allotted
This is very eerie to hear in 2020. Especially the part about long term economic causes, (not mentioned rise in price of foods and inflation, iconoclasm) the reintroduction of kneeling.
This is very good, is there a KS3-friendly version, with particular emphasis on the language and pacing. It would be amazing if there was a version for EAL students.
I have to watch this for history homework T-T Also her voice is so soothing. Ok but like can someone plz summarise this in 6 points in like the next hour?
Great videos but too fast speech. Some pauses and stresses, expressive intonation and emotions instead of coldness would go along way. Also The music in the background needs to rise and fall with the story line. The content though, is great!
John Pym along with other followers of Cromwell had been massacred and thrown into a pit. John Pym was named King John after he had died, for the great influence that he had had on Parliament. John Pym was a famous politician and the leader of the popular party in Long Parliament and had died at Derby House in Westminster on 8th December 1643. His magnificent funeral was held a few days later and both Houses of Parliament followed the coffin. He was buried under the gravestone of Sir John Wyndsore in the north ambulatory of Westminster Abbey. His body/remains were disinterred when Charles II was restored to the throne. This was done with many other followers of Cromwell; their remains were thrown in a pit of St. Margaret’s churchyard.
Check out Charles the first on BBC iPlayer Charles I: Downfall of a King, Series 1: 1. Two Worlds Collide: www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/m0006pbh via @bbciplayer
It would have been better a more professional person to give this information. The woman speaking gives a monotonous rendition of events and it gets tiring just listening to her blabber on. I later put the subtitles and turned off her monotonous voice and just read it. Worked much better.
King: "The Bible says that God puts kings on the thrown." Not The King: "The Bible also says God removes kings from the thrown." King: "And?" Not The King: *Full cocks flintlock* "Sometimes the hand of God gives an order to the duty of men."
Shame about the awful distracting music which distracts from a very clear presentation. I had to rewind many times because it’s too loud and completely unnecessary.
Mam also cover some aspect of Indian history ,why Britisher came India as trader under EIC but later capture Whole India ...and rule India for 200 yrs ....plz do cover some aspects ....😂😂😂😂🤗😜
Everyone is here for homework, ok? We all know by now...
Ikr😂
😭😭
Fr 💀
Fr
POV: You’re using this in your secondary school history class.
lol thats true
lol same
Very true!! 😂
UK vibez🤗
Yep
Anyone here for school homework
Everyone watching this for homework/exams, meanwhile I'm just curious about what happened back then
Same
bruh tf
"Am I... Better than everyone?"
Presented very well. The speaker spoke clearly. Thank you.
Beautiful. Short, sweet, concise.
I could listen to your voice all day to learn
I could listen to her all day. Beautiful voice and speech.
Shut the fuck up
pov: the teacher made you watch the video and take notes
Thank you for this. It is very interesting. I feel the main underlying cause of the civil wars, was that much of England especially in the south east, were no longer 'feudal' in structure, but had become much more complex with merchants, businesses, tradesmen, couriers, deliverymen and the like. Many failed to see the need for an absolute monarch, which no longer could effectively rule such a complex society, and thus in practice became less connected if not irrelevant. Parliament with all its committees could address the nations needs more effectively, but as you stated Parliament was denied that voice during the so called 11 years personal rule. What you say of course happened, but the resulting clashes were symptoms of this deeper underlying cause of inability to govern effectively.
On another note, the number of men who died in the war is nearly as much as British people who died in the second World War. It is sad, that this bloody period of English history is not taught in our schools, even because of its relevance to the rise of Parliamentary democracy.
Charles wanted an autocracy and free reign to do as he saw fit. He truly believed that god bestowed leadership upon him and Parliament was the hinderance to him ruling as such.
William Prynne recognised the king acting in such manner and overstepping his statutory bounds and John Hampden, who was MP for Buckinghamshire (if you don't know where it is please look it up - we're nowhere near the sea) rightly, stood up to him by refusing to raise the tax from his constituents.
Charles had options available to him and chose to imprison and martyr John Hampden to save his own pride in the short term, which added to Hampdens later fame and lore once he died at the ambush at Chalgrove.
Thomas Jefferson cites Hampden as one of his influences, amongst many other dissenters who've challenged authority since.
The civil war was taught when I went to school at least (I hope it still is) and coming from a place where John Hampden lived, makes it all the more salient and important. And evermore relevant in todays social and political landscape.
What we have lost is holding truth to power (irrespective of what side of the political fence you sit on, it's the same whether right or left) exacerbated by the indifference our elected officials value of our opinions and concerns, vs that of businesses and their lobbyists and the general malaise, apathy and disinterest most of us display in how we are now governed.
@@ceink1802 Search on Duk Duk for 'Joseph Pride executioner' the whole story is up there with citations
Brilliant,sir!!
Not true I was taught it the 1970s even though the school I attended wasn't Eaten the teacher made it interesting.
the question then becomes when WAS it truly feudal?
Cheers! Thank u from across the pond. As a citizen of thecUS, I enjoyed your history chat. I aldo lived 6 months in the UK many years ago. History is something we all need to learn and appreciate.
online school sucks ngl
POV: You are tryna make notes and your still half way through writing the first one and she's already said 200 different thing and you're gonna have to watch it like 20 times.
Thankyou for this video. Ive got my exams and need help. This really helped me. 👌
We're pleased to hear that you found this video helpful and we hope that your exam went well!
same
Very clear and precise
Bo Rerun `Agreed UvU
I dont undertsnad it
@@aaronalambara7510 ok.
thank you so much i needed this for my essay
Excellent summary - technically, there were 3 English civil wars but they often get referred to in the singular, probably because they occurred within a relatively short period of time (
And yet it is also known as the War of the Three Kingdoms because of Irish and Scot involvement.
I've never heard it referred to as the War of the Three Kingdoms
thanks
You are mistaken; Britain did exist, as did Great Britain. They are geographical features, not countries.
The name 'English' Civil War also isn't much accurate, though it is the popular name; Scotland and Ireland were each heavily involved in the three wars, particularly Scotland. That's why a lot of modern historians prefer the name 'Wars of the Three Kingdoms' or 'British Civil Wars' over the more inaccurate, if more popular, 'English Civil War'.
Fantastic and extremely helpful 👍
Well articulated. One thing that might be added was that Cromwell's personal animosity toward the Crown was a result of the presumed bastardization of the Crown long before Charles I was crowned. "If the King desires to be regarded as King by Parliament, asserting the Divine Right of Privilege, then the King must be the Divine King!" I can almost hear Cromwell yelling over objection. In short, the problem was that Charles I asserted "the divine right of Kings" but was not the divine king -- the Bastard was. And the Bastard was in the New World and had been the host of the "First Thanksgiving" no matter what Honest Abe Lincoln's influence on history books has claimed when creating the covering holiday to commemorate a perverted explanation of what happened. What Charles did by chartering the New England Company to John Winthrop in 1629 was to violate a long established treaty with the New World by pretending the treaty did not exist -- in exchange for cash. Oops. Cromwell objected. John Winthrop, in the new world, did not object. For obvious reasons.
Inspirational
excellent presentation, thanks
Very good stuff, guys! Love the study of this period in English history as a contrast/comparison to our own.
This really butters my crumpet
@Tristan’s in Slytherin tristan??? ive found uuuuu
What a sweet voice!! It's easy to grasp. Thank you.
Loved the video. It helped me a lot! Amazing explanation. 🇦🇷🇦🇷🇦🇷
Thank you this was extremely useful for my history exam!
Same
Thanks for your channel
Thank you.
Good job
could you please add subtitles to the video?
I put 0.75 speed,it's better.
How do you change the speed on youtube videos?
John M Guzman go on settings it looks like 3 dote then go to speed
This ASMR
I like this.
I got 1 tommorrow thanks
What good for a Monarchy if the sovereignty is to be shared with people representatives ( Subjects to the King and Crown if I may add ) ? Does this not the rule and principle of Monarchy ?
That was the big question.Along with whether England was Catholic or Protestant. Finally settled with William and Mary. We also have the Protestant succession written into law. Don't ignore the impact of the Reformation.
To those unhappy the young lady and the speed she's talking at your question is in the title 🙄 it's 5 minutes not 10 thought she did remarkably well in the time she was allotted
This is very eerie to hear in 2020. Especially the part about long term economic causes, (not mentioned rise in price of foods and inflation, iconoclasm) the reintroduction of kneeling.
Very easy to understand 👍
An ancestor of mine and argued with others including over religion and land
REVOLUTION to be accurate.
This is very good, is there a KS3-friendly version, with particular emphasis on the language and pacing. It would be amazing if there was a version for EAL students.
Please could I use this in my art history teaching...?
Yes, please go ahead
@@HistoryHub thank you that really means alot. You're a star
Anyone give me the answer to why economic reasons began the civil war other than ship money my essay is tomorrow 😭
I have to watch this for history homework T-T Also her voice is so soothing.
Ok but like can someone plz summarise this in 6 points in like the next hour?
Sounds familiar
Great videos but too fast speech. Some pauses and stresses, expressive intonation and emotions instead of coldness would go along way. Also The music in the background needs to rise and fall with the story line. The content though, is great!
3:43 if they ran out of money when did the banker's step in. I mean banks were always ther.
Hello I know my friends will see this
No Cromwell?
John Pym along with other followers of Cromwell had been massacred and thrown into a pit. John Pym was named King John after he had died, for the great influence that he had had on Parliament. John Pym was a famous politician and the leader of the popular party in Long Parliament and had died at Derby House in Westminster on 8th December 1643. His magnificent funeral was held a few days later and both Houses of Parliament followed the coffin. He was buried under the gravestone of Sir John Wyndsore in the north ambulatory of Westminster Abbey. His body/remains were disinterred when Charles II was restored to the throne. This was done with many other followers of Cromwell; their remains were thrown in a pit of St. Margaret’s churchyard.
This is so dead but saved me for a test tanks
Very good presentation! Very attractive woman doing the presentation!
:)
Perhaps it needs a narrator with a little more gravitas who speaks slower.
Snob.
I got a test tommorow...
I dont listen in lessons
Asmr
Lol i got lost near the start, she speaks too fast
yh i was looking at this and it was fast.lol
Britain still has subjects till this day and not free citizens due to monarchy.
2019? Parliament (ruling elitists) v The People.
WhO'S WaTcHiNg In 2o2|
You're speeding to much and captions are not included 🤧🤧🤧
If you click on the cog icon you can reduce the playback speed.
Captions have now been added!
thnku didi , te amo
Cheers got hw in the bag
POV: Your teacher sent you this
I'm utterly fascinated by English history from Magna Carter to WW2...
Long Live The Queen!!!
Check out Charles the first on BBC iPlayer Charles I: Downfall of a King, Series 1: 1. Two Worlds Collide: www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/m0006pbh via @bbciplayer
Idk man WAR kinda sussy nuclear war HAHAH
im cooked
me too bro
real shit
The executioner was Joseph Pride 12 year old son of Thomas Pride of Prides Purge. see the proof on the web
Online history lesson
Hehe
Mam I am from India
I google all this
As our English is not that much to grash Enlish peole
It would have been better a more professional person to give this information. The woman speaking gives a monotonous rendition of events and it gets tiring just listening to her blabber on. I later put the subtitles and turned off her monotonous voice and just read it. Worked much better.
dis aint 5 mins
King: "The Bible says that God puts kings on the thrown."
Not The King: "The Bible also says God removes kings from the thrown."
King: "And?"
Not The King: *Full cocks flintlock* "Sometimes the hand of God gives an order to the duty of men."
Shame about the awful distracting music which distracts from a very clear presentation. I had to rewind many times because it’s too loud and completely unnecessary.
why this lady is in so much of hurry?
Reads too fast!! Had to stop listening!!
Mam also cover some aspect of Indian history ,why Britisher came India as trader under EIC but later capture Whole India ...and rule India for 200 yrs
....plz do cover some aspects ....😂😂😂😂🤗😜
pov: history homework
She talks so fast
Organized religion messing things up per usual. Excellent video. Thank you.
Charles I was a tyrant
Aghhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh🧑🦲
I don't talk nerd
No reason, and argument, just violence, and blood...phew!!
Greed
Obama 🧑🏿🦱
Jesus loves you all! :)
Wooooow I don’t care it’s so pointless
Why comment then? Definitely not pointless
why you talk like this
ı hardly catched things you said
good
He's originally from scotland so he thinks he can imposed same rule to england but they have the magna carta and not absolute.
I love u girl