BMW X5 4.4i vs WV Passat CC 2.0t Acceleration

BMW E53 X5 4.4 320 hp 2004 (facelift LCI)
versus
Volkswagen Passat CC 2.0 tsi 211 ps r-line 2012 DSG .
Both cars are stock.
Comparison of accelerations.
As you can see, CC is pretty fast from the start. And it retains superiority on the whole interval of time.
Hope you enjoy this vid =)
Some results:
0-60 mph
X5 - 7.14 seconds
CC - 6.5 sec
Original videos:
Passat CC
• Volkswagen Passat CC 2...
BMW X5
• BMW X5 e53 4.4i 2004 (...

[@ne0beatsm0rp98]

Your going to expect that from a BMW X5 4.4. Its pulling weight compared to the passat but it kept up well.

[@MadAlbo]

yes it is, guys read at the speedometer it is writen mph, you just multiply by 1.6 and you find the result in km

[@ADIG01]

BMW

[@davitzhorzholiani4087]

როგორ გააერთიანეთ ვიდეოები? რამე პროგრამაა? მომწერე რა ძმურად :)

[@SaqAuto]

+Davit Zhorzholiani Sony Vegas Pro 13 dzma
Naxe youtubshi. Bevri video aris am temaze

[@davitzhorzholiani4087]

+SaqAuto მადლობა))

[@csf3lihao]

Is that CC with stock 147kw, and 280Nm @ 1700rpm, 235/45/R17 tires, total weight 1.55tons ? if so, then unbelievable.

[@SaqAuto]

Hao Liu Why unbelievable? It shows factory results

[@csf3lihao]

SaqAuto I'm not saying it's not credible, I just find it hard to believe. My 2014 2.0 tsi passat has almost identical specs as this CC, both with EA888 engine and same 6 speed DSG, I tried flooring it in S mode yesterday(ESP on), the average 0-100km/h drops in between 7 and 8 seconds. And my tires are 235/45/R18. That is why I felt unbelievable that you can get it within 6.5s. I know VW must've done some tweeks to CC's computer to bring out the full potential of EA888, but I wasn't expecting a 1 second difference. Besides the factory results of CC 2.0t I get here from VW is 7.9s.

[@lyonchen7308]

+Hao Liu this is cc 2.0tfsi at 200hp.

[@kamilr6581]

no way

[@SaqAuto]

Kamil R what?