Stephen Meyer: DNA and Information - Science Uprising Expert Interview

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 6. 06. 2024
  • In this bonus interview footage from Science Uprising, philosopher of science Stephen Meyer discusses DNA, biological information, and how the information encoded in DNA points to an intelligent cause. He appears in Science Uprising EP3 DNA: The Programmer. Is the software that runs life the result of accumulated copying errors? Or does it require a programmer? Be sure to visit scienceuprising.com/ to find more videos and explore related articles and books.
    Stephen C. Meyer received his Ph. D. in the philosophy of science from the University of Cambridge and besides being a pioneer in intelligent design research is currently the Director of the Center for Science and Culture at Discovery Institute. His latest book, "Darwin's Doubt: The Explosive Origin of Animal Life and the Case for Intelligent Design.", was a New York Times bestseller.
    In his current research Meyer is examining and explaining the amazing depth of digital technology found in each and every living cell, such as nested coding, digital processing, distributive retrieval and storage systems, and genomic operating systems. He is developing a more fundamental argument for intelligent design that is based not on a single feature like the bacterial flagellum, but rather on a pervasive feature of all living systems. Alongside matter and energy, Dr. Meyer shows that there is a third fundamental entity in the universe needed for life: information. For more about Dr. Meyer and his research be sure to visit darwinsdoubt.com/.
    Check out our other videos:
    Science Uprising Episode 1 - Reality: Real vs. Material
    Has science proven we are all just matter? Or does reality extend beyond what we can see and touch? • Michael Egnor Demolish...
    Unbelievable Myths Neil deGrasse Tyson and Co. Love to Tell
    • Unbelievable Myths Nei...
    Check out other videos from the Science Uprising playlist:
    • See more of Science Up...
    Subscribe to our channel: / discoverysciencenews
    For more about Dr. Meyer and his research be sure to visit darwinsdoubt.com/.
    ============================
    The Discovery Science News Channel is the official CZcams channel of Discovery Institute's Center for Science & Culture. The CSC is the institutional hub for scientists, educators, and inquiring minds who think that nature supplies compelling evidence of intelligent design. The CSC supports research, sponsors educational programs, defends free speech, and produce articles, books, and multimedia content. For more information visit www.discovery.org/id/
    www.evolutionnews.org/
    www.intelligentdesign.org/
    Follow us on Facebook and Twitter:
    Twitter: @discoverycsc
    Facebook: / discoverycsc
    Visit other CZcams channels connected to the Center for Science & Culture
    Discovery Institute: / discoveryinstitute
    Dr. Stephen C. Meyer: / drstephenmeyer
    The Magician's Twin - CS Lewis & Evolution: / cslewisweb
    Darwin's Heretic - Alfred Russel Wallce: / alfredrwallaceid
  • Věda a technologie

Komentáře • 237

  • @Jeremiah6071
    @Jeremiah6071 Před 5 lety +147

    It's hard to argue with Dr. Meyer. I see a lot of dislikes on this video, but I imagine those are based on bias rather than legitimate disagreement of what he actually says.

  • @JV-tg2ne
    @JV-tg2ne Před 5 lety +248

    The complexity is astonishing - as a software engineer I can clearly say DNA is far more complex than 32/64 bit system code

    • @thomasranjit7781
      @thomasranjit7781 Před 5 lety +11

      It is God of the Holy Bible that brought creation in to existence.. ..how U know it ??? By prophecy..... please google Holy Bible prophecy and accuracy....only a God who exists outside the constraints of space and time can predict events before they happen.......and as per Holy Bible prophecy dark days are coming in the world.......... since churches have started closing have U observed an increase in lawlessness....

    • @asimtahir7859
      @asimtahir7859 Před 5 lety

      So you still cant do it even in 2019 year?

    • @kylethedalek
      @kylethedalek Před 5 lety +1

      What about the long term evolution experiment?
      Done with E. Coli and proved and shown they mutated into a different species.
      Also the algae experiments some this February?

    • @larrytemp3063
      @larrytemp3063 Před 5 lety

      Thomas Ranjit WHEN YOU SAY CHURCHES CLOSING ARE YOU MEANING CLOSING DOWN OR OR VERY FEW SERVICES

    • @ValChronification
      @ValChronification Před 5 lety +6

      @@thomasranjit7781 I believe in Design but I don't believe in the Bible because I won't follow a God who'd sends non believers to Hell.

  • @HappyBoyProductions
    @HappyBoyProductions Před 4 lety +37

    This guy is brilliant. I can see why no one wants to debate him.

  • @wilhorstman59
    @wilhorstman59 Před 5 lety +84

    Finaly I found one who explains this matter clear and sound. I am not 100% convinced, but time to leave the materialistic vieuw.

  • @Mkhehla
    @Mkhehla Před 4 lety +32

    🤯What an amazing guy. The way he explains things makes sense to even a regular mind like mine!

  • @stevearcus2963
    @stevearcus2963 Před 4 lety +24

    Amazing how the DNA works in the cells to provide the information necessary for the functionality in the cells. Hopefully they can do some repair work in the eyes of those who choose not to see the designer concept.

  • @MrNanonen
    @MrNanonen Před 5 lety +31

    Stephen C Meyer, I’ve been watching you videos for about 6 months. I decided to buy your books signature in the cells, Darwin’s doubt, and the return of the God hypothesis. Can’t wait for them to get delivered.
    Keep up the fantastic work you’re doing.

    • @kylethedalek
      @kylethedalek Před 5 lety +1

      MrNanonen What about the long term evolution experiment?
      Done with E. Coli and proved and shown they mutated into a different species.
      Also the algae experiments some this February?

  • @Michiel_de_Jong
    @Michiel_de_Jong Před 5 lety +50

    The SETI project is looking for intelligent life in space. They follow the same line of reasoning: a meaningful signal implies intelligence.

  • @jackwilmoresongs
    @jackwilmoresongs Před 4 lety +15

    Dr. Meyer, Thankyou for putting in the hard work that allows you to speak so fluently and authoritatively on what many people must know intuitively - '"Things like the cell just do not happen by accident." Thankyou for the professional labor you put in to explain to some of us WHY we feel strongly as we do in the face of a skeptical modern scientific culture.

  • @intelligentdesignacademy3460

    The problem of information
    Norbert Weiner - MIT Mathematician - Father of Cybernetics
    "Information is information, not matter or energy. No materialism which does not admit this can survive at the present day."
    It has to be explained:
    - a library index and fully automated information classification, storage and retrieval program ( chromosomes, and the gene regulatory network )
    - The origin of the complex, codified, specified, instructional information stored in the genome and epigenetic codes to make the first living organism
    - The origin of the genetic Code
    - How it got nearly optimal for allowing additional information within protein-coding sequences
    - How it got more robust than 1 million alternative possible codes
    - The origin of the over twentythree epigenetic codes
    - The origin of the information transmission system, that is the origin of the genetic code itself, encoding, transmission, decoding and translation
    - The origin of the genetic cipher/translation, from digital ( DNA / mRNA ) to analog ( Protein )
    - The origin of the hardware, that is DNA, RNA, amino acids, and carbohydrates for fuel generation
    - The origin of the replication/duplication of the DNA
    - The origin of the signal recognition particle
    - The origin of the tubulin Code for correct direction to the final destination of proteins
    none of the above items can be explained by evolution since evolution depends on all this.
    1. Regulation, governing, controlling, recruiting, interpretation, recognition, orchestrating, elaborating strategies, guiding, instruct are all tasks of the gene regulatory network.
    2. Such activity can only be exercised if no intelligence is present if the correct actions were pre-programmed by intelligence.
    3. Therefore, most probably, the gene regulatory network was programmed by an intelligent agency.
    1. The setup of functional Information retrieval systems, like a library classification system, is always tracked back to intelligence
    2. The gene regulatory network is a fully automated, pre-programmed, ultra-complex gene information extraction system
    3. Therefore, its origin is best explained through intelligent setup
    1. DNA stores information based on a code system, and codified, complex, instructional information, with the same function as a blueprint.
    2. All codes and blueprints come from intelligence.
    3. Therefore, the genetic code and the instructions to build cells and complex biological organisms, stored in DNA, were most likely created by an intelligent agency.
    1. Cells use sophisticated information transmission and amplification systems (signalling pathways), information interpretation, combination and selection ( the Gene regulatory network ) encoding and transcription ( DNA & RNA polymerase machines ) transmission (mRNA), and decoding ( Ribosome ) systems.
    2. Setup of information transmission systems, aka. transmission, amplification, interpretation, combination, selection, encoding, transmission, and decoding are always a deliberate act of intelligence
    3. The existence of the genetic information transmission system is best explained by the implementation of an intelligent designer.
    The central problem in biology
    reasonandscience.catsboard.com/t2826-the-central-problem-in-biology
    Complex Specified/instructing Information - It’s not that hard to understand
    reasonandscience.catsboard.com/t2374-complex-instructing-specified-information-its-not-that-hard-to-understand
    DNA stores literally coded information
    reasonandscience.catsboard.com/t1281-dna-stores-literally-coded-information
    The language of the genetic code
    reasonandscience.catsboard.com/t1472-the-language-of-the-genetic-code
    Coded information comes always from a mind
    reasonandscience.catsboard.com/t1312-coded-information-comes-always-from-a-mind
    The genetic code cannot arise through natural selection
    reasonandscience.catsboard.com/t1405-the-genetic-code-cannot-arise-through-natural-selection
    The five levels of information in DNA
    reasonandscience.catsboard.com/t1311-the-five-levels-of-information-in-dna
    The genetic code, insurmountable problem for non-intelligent origin
    reasonandscience.catsboard.com/t2363-the-genetic-code-unsurmountable-problem-for-non-intelligent-origin
    Wanna Build a Cell? A DVD Player Might Be Easier
    reasonandscience.catsboard.com/t2404-wanna-build-a-cell-a-dvd-player-might-be-easier
    The amazing DNA information storage capacity
    reasonandscience.catsboard.com/t2052-the-amazing-dna-information-storage-capacity
    The different genetic codes
    reasonandscience.catsboard.com/t2277-the-different-genetic-codes
    The various codes in the cell
    reasonandscience.catsboard.com/t2213-the-various-codes-in-the-cell
    DNA - the instructional blueprint of life
    reasonandscience.catsboard.com/t2544-dna-the-instructional-blueprint-of-life
    Is calling DNA code just a metaphor?
    reasonandscience.catsboard.com/t1466-is-calling-dna-a-code-just-a-metaphor#2131

    • @kylethedalek
      @kylethedalek Před 5 lety +2

      Intelligent Design Academy What about the long term evolution experiment?
      Done with E. Coli and proved and shown they mutated into a different species.
      Also the algae experiments some this February?

  • @signsofsuccess
    @signsofsuccess Před 5 lety +26

    Coherent convincing and dispassionate argumentation. Impressive for the unbiased.

  • @smokymole2487
    @smokymole2487 Před 5 lety +38

    Thanks Mr Meyer always interesting and refreshing listening to your wisdom.

  • @kahkulion7774
    @kahkulion7774 Před 5 lety +69

    The light shines upon the darkness yet the darkness cannot understand or know it.

  • @dawne2760
    @dawne2760 Před 5 lety +27

    THAT says everything ~ evolution explains 'survival'.....not 'ARRIVAL'....love it! How grand!

  • @jillceansu5267
    @jillceansu5267 Před 3 lety +8

    That was AMAZING!! Thank you for explaining in such eloquent terms, the obvious truth of our existence.

  • @PInk77W1
    @PInk77W1 Před 5 lety +79

    I love how science proves God

  • @sneakyquick
    @sneakyquick Před 3 lety +9

    I am a software engineer for over 23 years. It is very complex precise work. We have to debug and test many times to get code to work correctly so to think you can just randomly change code and come up with complex complete code for proteins is nonsense.

  • @hawkcob6349
    @hawkcob6349 Před 4 lety +15

    I love it! Science is revealing God and not dismissing or disproving Him ❤️

  • @agaluszka
    @agaluszka Před 5 lety +18

    Excellent & logic explanation - 10 points !

  • @cynthiafeick
    @cynthiafeick Před 5 lety +4

    LOVE reading your books ("Signature in the Cell," "Darwin's Doubt") and listening to you explain "Intelligent Design," Dr. Meyer. Putting these complex concepts into layman's terms that a person of average intelligence can understand is an extraordinary gift. Thank you and God bless!

  • @mattmiller478
    @mattmiller478 Před 5 lety +17

    Love this guy. So very articulate.

  • @edisoncastillo8458
    @edisoncastillo8458 Před 5 lety +36

    Thank you!

  • @gregc.4117
    @gregc.4117 Před 4 lety +15

    Sad to think some would watch this and still cling to their archaic “something from nothing” presupposition.

  • @KenJackson_US
    @KenJackson_US Před 4 lety +7

    Very Good! The more I lean about proteins, the more shocked I am that any knowledgeable people still have faith in evolution. It was a reasonable theory, back in the 19th century, but we've learned SO MUCH that it's clearly bankrupt.

  • @VesselofMercy100
    @VesselofMercy100 Před 4 lety +23

    It’s funny how Richard Dawkins has been quoted as saying he could accept the idea of a simple God, or even an alien, or that we can become a god ourselves. So in other words, he just can’t accept the GOD of the Bible.
    That is the only God that is impossible in his mind.
    Even though that would be the only God capable of starting a universe like the one we live in. Only an infinite, all knowing, all powerful, always present God can be powerful to start a “big bang”. There was a Big Bang alright. The moment God said, “let there be light”

  • @mariamkinen8036
    @mariamkinen8036 Před 5 lety +8

    Wish I had studied deeper as early as at school,but this is great information .👍🏻🍒Anytime. Be back here.

  • @movilnet6992
    @movilnet6992 Před 5 lety +14

    Wow, this guy is brilliant

  • @avatacron60
    @avatacron60 Před 5 lety +22

    Very good!

  • @SmokingJoe62
    @SmokingJoe62 Před měsícem

    Absolutely fascinating and I love how Dr Meyer explains the science in a language I can understand.

  • @LawrenceB123
    @LawrenceB123 Před 4 lety +4

    Watson and Crick who discovered the DNA double Helix in 1953 put an end to the theory of evolution its just that a lot of people never received or understood the memo.
    German engineer and IT specialist, Werner Gitt summarizes it this way: A necessary requirement for generating meaningful information is the ability to select from alternatives and this requires an intelligent, volitional entity. Unguided, random processes cannot do this not in any amount of time because this selection process demands continuous guidance.

  • @AamirKhan-hc7vo
    @AamirKhan-hc7vo Před 4 lety +5

    Thank you for an amazing insight into the subject

  • @francisbacharov4494
    @francisbacharov4494 Před 5 lety +10

    Nice logical explanation!

  • @willembont4790
    @willembont4790 Před 5 lety +5

    Thanks for sharing. Great presentation.

  • @LoveYourNeighbour.
    @LoveYourNeighbour. Před 5 lety +9

    Signature In The Cell by Stephen Meyer, was one of THE SEMINAL WORKS on DNA as evidence of Intelligent Design. Even Atheist philosopher Thomas Nagel applauded it! (Though I'll admit, it was a tad too technical for ME.) Stephen, I believe you're a TRUE PIONEER of our day, who will be seen (in future years) as one of the few people who saw the OBVIOUS, and was courageous enough to take a stand against the mainstream Materialistic worldview. P.S. I never saw you DRIVING AROUND before, while explaining the wonders of Intelligent Design. Nice touch :-)

  • @oterosocram25
    @oterosocram25 Před 5 lety +30

    God is a great Creator! Definitely a great Writer.

  • @Michelle-sq6qi
    @Michelle-sq6qi Před 5 lety +10

    Thank you Stephen Meyer. You have a knack of simplifying scientific data in layman's terms thus making it easier to understand the information presented to us. Appreciate your hard work and all the scientists at the Discovery Institute who use science to argue for Design and an Intelligent Mind

  • @sportdutch
    @sportdutch Před 5 lety +6

    You figured it all out. Great!!

  • @johnb187
    @johnb187 Před 5 lety +24

    Excellent, so well explained by Stephen

  • @jsphfalcon
    @jsphfalcon Před 5 lety +14

    Thank. You have truly helped me understand the fallacies Darwin threw our way.

  • @speedoflight9005
    @speedoflight9005 Před 5 lety +7

    You don't need faith nowadays to arrive at the conclusion that was a Perfect Mind, a Creator who designed this complexity impossible to imagine. I always ways rational, exceptic and now I know that. Thanks Stephen!!

  • @magellan6108
    @magellan6108 Před 5 lety +3

    Outstanding!

  • @OscarRamos-ql4io
    @OscarRamos-ql4io Před 4 lety +26

    Clear evidence for a Creator - The Lord of lords.

  • @carvalhoribeirod
    @carvalhoribeirod Před 4 lety +29

    Science leads to God - though science done superficially will take us away from God, so the more you research the more study it the more we realize that science will lead as to God either sooner or later!

  • @wade5941
    @wade5941 Před 4 lety +2

    Very good explanation.

  • @mickhailmateen9815
    @mickhailmateen9815 Před 4 lety +7

    Thanks for your work it’s shows there’s only one explanation for creation
    a amazing intelligent creator
    Much appreciated really learnt from your work

  • @Only1INDRAJIT
    @Only1INDRAJIT Před 4 lety +1

    Very inspiring, very thought provoking.. I have read and will keep reading much more stuffs related to ID

    • @debbie94510
      @debbie94510 Před 4 lety

      ID has bolstered my faith. I would still believe without it, but God is merciful. In these last days, He is giving us believers (and those who do not believe) His mercy and grace, in direct opposition to the stranglehold that the materialists have over science and science education in this country. Thank you, Lord!!!!

  • @skyward7699
    @skyward7699 Před 4 lety +3

    Can we have an Arabic Translation CC? PLEASE

  • @rep3e4
    @rep3e4 Před 4 lety +3

    Awesome

  • @randomness3235
    @randomness3235 Před 5 lety +2

    I wish Stephen Meyer and Professor Denis Noble would do an interview together.. different topics, but similar outcomes in their theories.

  • @joshrichards9121
    @joshrichards9121 Před 3 lety +1

    God bless the beautiful mind He gave you, Stephen C. Meyer.

  • @bsim4431
    @bsim4431 Před 5 lety

    This is interesting. does anyone have videos that propose the counter argument?

    • @ralphgoreham3516
      @ralphgoreham3516 Před 5 lety +2

      The most vocal critic is Ken Miller who is a theistic evolutionist. You will find him on youtube. His argument for the origin of the bacterial flagellum centers around the magical CO-OPTION. That is, another bacterium that has 10 of the 30 odd proteins that the flagellum must have.. To account for the 20 to make up the flagellum he says they were co-opted or seconded randomly from bits and pieces of protein parts from somewhere, not even a guess where, and a couple of cellular pumps used for a different purpose near the cell membrane. But no one in the lab has ever seen/proven that co-option ever occurs in cell biology or Biology per se. Like all origin ideas it is full of maybes, must have beens, might haves etc. Trust me you would be wasting your time.

  • @CyberDivan
    @CyberDivan Před 3 lety

    I am impressed! Your discussion on the mind fascinated me. Kant, the philosopher, explained that we process everything through our natural mind. it is not that mind exist, but that "How do we know that when we see red, it is the ting in itself not green? We can only be sure if the Creator became human and communicated that to us thus verified our senses. hence not only is there intelligent design but we can trust our that intelligence talks to us..

  • @HansMcc1984
    @HansMcc1984 Před 2 lety

    Very good argument.

  • @eleutheroosetfree7777
    @eleutheroosetfree7777 Před 4 lety

    I would like to know if the information is received by the DNA molecule in “real time” (ie like an antennae) or if it is imbedded within the molecule itself.

  • @hirahiradiamond4010
    @hirahiradiamond4010 Před 3 lety

    Thankyou Mayer

  • @01MeuCanal
    @01MeuCanal Před 4 lety +4

    Everything Dr. Stephen is talking about "mind" is so pretty obvious.

  • @fatimavj5894
    @fatimavj5894 Před 3 lety

    Alguien que me comparta un Link donde esté traducido a español este video

  • @englishmeans
    @englishmeans Před 5 lety +1

    You are a smart man Steven.

    • @ralphgoreham3516
      @ralphgoreham3516 Před 5 lety

      Yes he is and is hated by not a few in the scientific realm. It is the discovery institute that evokes them to considerable anger. The reason is the same when anyones belief, or professed belief is threatened. Oh I have been wrong!. Lawence Krauss; "A uniiverse from nothing" is such a one.

  • @salvadorhirth1641
    @salvadorhirth1641 Před 5 lety +2

    Another curious thing, is the possibility of "looking at our own thoughts" as if we're an observer that is conscious of thoughts and with training it's even possible to even choose the thoughts that we want around... people are more than sacks of cells.

    • @GustAdlph
      @GustAdlph Před 5 lety +1

      HI Salvador, agreed, people are not just sacks of cells. The former atheist turned Christian author C.S. Lewis said if our thoughts are just random firings of neurons in our brain, then they have no meaning and my ideas are no better than yours and vice versa.

  • @Mindhumble
    @Mindhumble Před 5 lety +13

    i have spoken to atheists and explained these ideas and the ID approach to proving intelligent design using darwin's own methods, but it seems to go completely over their head. i think the idea is subtle, but when a person has their preconceived biases and compound that with the fact that one has to have at least a modicom of critical thought and logic makes it a real uphill struggle to get them to the stage when tthe "penny drops".

    • @JR-nh7fc
      @JR-nh7fc Před 5 lety

      "explained these ideas and the ID approach to proving intelligent design using darwin's own methods, " what do you mean by darwin's methods?

    • @Lakeslover1
      @Lakeslover1 Před 5 lety +1

      Mindhumble People only believe what they want to.

  • @ShadesofViolet8
    @ShadesofViolet8 Před 5 lety +3

    Thank you for sharing. Really interesting.

  • @ob1keno227
    @ob1keno227 Před 5 lety +1

    This is so intriguing... this is not theist vs atheist battle, is open mind vs closed mind

  • @stevejames5863
    @stevejames5863 Před 2 lety

    i find this fascinating, and i get what he s saying... i think also the complexity of dna, shows a creator, i really do.]

  • @midlandernc7403
    @midlandernc7403 Před 5 lety

    So who wrote the first code? How is there life to code life. I think this discounts chemistry and sub quantum physics that we really though quite sofisticated know little about in relation to possibilities in the greater universe or cosmos

  • @summerlakephotog8239
    @summerlakephotog8239 Před 4 lety +2

    Bob Newhart had a comedy bit where millions of monkeys were placed at millions of typewriters to test the theory that eventually they would type all the great books. One of the monitors of the experiment became excited when he finally discovered that one monkey had typed, “To be or not to be that is the gazzzornunplat.” Even in the 50s people knew information was not the result of randomness.

  • @borislavvaradinov8923
    @borislavvaradinov8923 Před 5 lety +5

    I think Mr. Meyer gives a wrong answer on the last question (Why do certain scientists reject Intelligent Design Theory?). I think the answer is much more pragmatic and rational than explaining the "mind". The answer is: because when there's no "Intelligent Designer" presented, any "evil" act could be assumed "good", and therefore the "evil" becomes relativistic and abstract idea. In other words: when there's no a judge to judge your actions, all actions you plan and perform could be seen as "meant to be good". You might drop a nuclear bomb and exterminate 40-50 000 people instantly and ruin the life of couple of next generations, but when there's no "intelligent designer" to judge your act as "incredibly evil", you might assume that throwing a nuclear bomb is actually a "good thing", because it scientifically displays what's the effect of a nuclear bomb.
    Those scientists who reject the existence of an intelligent designer, are looking for self-comforting excuse for their own monstrosity.

  • @comochinganconesto
    @comochinganconesto Před 3 lety

    You had me right up until intelligent design. Yes, you are correct and saying that the search space is vast and that it's complexity is enormous and the successful results few and far between. Yet, so our prime numbers and we can find new primes with basic rules.
    That being said, I do wonder if certain pairs or certain combination of pairs are more likely to go together and create new traits. Such that, it is not a "brute Force algorithm" but rather a "neural network" based on simplistic rules that has built up on itself since the beginning of time.

  • @kentclark9616
    @kentclark9616 Před 2 lety +1

    Actually dna can carry faulty sequences for generations without any degradation. It’s not like computer code where 1 fault immediately ruins the program

  • @zwatwashdc
    @zwatwashdc Před 5 lety +5

    Its consciousness. It is the basic stuff of the universe, and it works against entropy and drives towards intelligence and complexity.

  • @Itsjustmyselfsoitis
    @Itsjustmyselfsoitis Před 5 lety +4

    The camera man had a few too many

  • @therosses5
    @therosses5 Před 3 lety

    Stephen Meyer is a Master of Science. Without intelligent design, life is a futile attempt to connect invisible dots. Yet the invisible Designer has left visible dots in creation for all to connect. May the rocks cry out!!

  • @doreenwylie3600
    @doreenwylie3600 Před 5 lety +5

    Superb - As the Bible has told us "IN THE BEGGING GOD " Our DNA is so unique and special ONLY a truly wonderful Creator could have accomplished this re; Genesis before anything came into being GOD WAS

  • @johngluck3454
    @johngluck3454 Před 5 lety +7

    God is the creator he is the light and love.

  • @supahottfire
    @supahottfire Před rokem

    Is there enough time for a random mutation to work?

  • @debblouin
    @debblouin Před 3 lety

    The movie Contact beautifully illustrates this concept. Arrow at is given a glimpse of a planet orbiting Vega and sees a level of order to which she immediately responds “they’re alive.”
    Dawkins is not nearly as smart as we think he is. He might be as smart as he THINKS he is. But he isn’t as smart as he needs to be to make the claims and objections he makes. And would love to see him and David Berlinski debate.

  • @standup1099
    @standup1099 Před rokem

    Mmmmm interesting 🤔 watching in 2022

  • @mikemcguire7579
    @mikemcguire7579 Před 4 lety +2

    There must be a transcendent being that exists outside the material universe who conceived this. It is not logical to insist this could happen by random chance.

  • @michel.7048
    @michel.7048 Před 5 lety +1

    Basically there is an intelligence behind the information coding for DNA.

  • @SuperChrisgaffney
    @SuperChrisgaffney Před 5 lety +7

    Dawkins must have pushed the dislike button 46 times.....not like him to pull himself away from the mirror .....vain egotistic man ..

  • @joanh.richardson4906
    @joanh.richardson4906 Před 4 lety +7

    It's funny that Dawkins attempted to prove evolution without the need for intelligence by creating a program that was aimed to find its predetermined conclusion. Obviously, this involved no intelligence.

  • @1974jrod
    @1974jrod Před 4 lety +1

    The one thing we know for sure is, everytime a scientific experiment takes place it proves it takes an intelligent cause to perform the experiment.
    Bread doesnt make itself. Haha!

  • @ultramagahoosierhermit2767

    Imagine a book falls from the sky

  • @mashable8759
    @mashable8759 Před 3 lety +2

    GOD is the best designer, programmer, architect, creator, engineer...

  • @attrix09
    @attrix09 Před 3 lety

    Rosalind Franklin!

  • @1DVSB
    @1DVSB Před 5 lety +1

    What I find interesting is the NASA astronaut with an identical twin brother that spent a year in space had his DNA changed when compared to his brother. The other thing I thought interesting was back millions of years ago on earth the atmosphere was comprised of different ratios of elements. There was a study in which dragonflies were raised in an environment replicating the earth a million years ago. They became many times the size of the originals. That seems to tell you DNA is subject to the environment. Amazingly complex and designed to function anywhere in the universe. The building blocks of the universe work together in a way that makes the case for intelligent design, in other words a God so to speak.

  • @amazingkidsronny6332
    @amazingkidsronny6332 Před 3 lety +3

    And God is the creator of these all miracles

  • @geobla6600
    @geobla6600 Před 3 lety

    It's mind boggling how anyone could imagine the specified information that's encoded in DNA which requires one the most complex proteins to "Read & Translate The Information", is somehow randomly created itself from nothing to enable it with an ability to physically
    attach itself to the DNA , read and translate the code and create the specific information from it to help other equally complex machines (proteins) make more purpose specific
    proteins. It's like swamp water building a modern day city. All the stuffs there less the
    intelligence required to create the information and the ability to comprehend the information
    for a future purpose and the lack of 10's of thousands of informed coordinated forces
    required to start at a preliminary point and end up at future point with a city.
    The stuff that takes place in so called simple cells and the amount of information
    required for its proper function itself is enormous , never mind the ginormous amount
    of information required for inter-cellular interactions . This alone pales our smartest
    civil engineers abilities with their intelligence and ability of foresight. Unbelievable
    that intelligent people can even consider this with the amount of scientific "Information"
    showing otherwise.

  • @kylethedalek
    @kylethedalek Před 5 lety +1

    What about the long term evolution experiment?
    Done with E. Coli and proved and shown they mutated into a different species.
    Also the algae experiments some this February?

    • @sunix6551
      @sunix6551 Před 5 lety

      What did the E. Coli bacteria become after the evolution time lapse? ...or the algae? Answer: bacteria and algae.

    • @Lakeslover1
      @Lakeslover1 Před 5 lety

      kylethedalek I understood they degraded ?

    • @ralphgoreham3516
      @ralphgoreham3516 Před 5 lety

      Craig Ventor and his team spent 10 years mapping out the human genome or DNA. Though he is not a creationist he did say at least 80% of the non producing DNA, (its introns) are not junk and are tied up with gene expression. That was 7 years ago and now more is known about epigenetics, but still away to go to fully understand it; it may well be connected to those introns. Bacteria are some 3 billion years old and the creator gave them the ability to share Genes since they dont sexually reproduce. Please cite the authoritive peer reviewed references for your claims re E coli and Algae.

    • @ralphgoreham3516
      @ralphgoreham3516 Před 5 lety

      All bacteria are involved in all life forms and as long as they dont wind up in the wrong organisn or animal, will be beneficial. They can adapt to antibiotics because in the Gene pool of each of their species are variations that will resist, and as said can share genes to help each other out.(plasmid activity). But they have remained bugs for more than 3 billion years and are ubiquitous in land air and sea. Such is the wisdom of the creator, and they will never be any more than bugs.

  • @josephcook778
    @josephcook778 Před 3 lety

    I agree with what he says but he looks like the lawyer on Better Call Saul

  • @georgesmith2977
    @georgesmith2977 Před 5 lety +1

    It’s one thing to post a video on ID. It’s another to have a group of scientific peers to then question many of the presuppositions of this arguments . Sorry not convinced until this is properly scrutinised.

  • @sskv19
    @sskv19 Před 4 lety

    Indian Scientists of Ancients times say, that Knowledge (Gnyana) is defined as God or vice versa.
    Being Knowledgeable means having all information (All Data).
    Data is Intelligence. Data or Information or Intelligence is synonymous to Knowledge.

  • @mrlozano
    @mrlozano Před 4 lety +15

    The fool says in his heart, “There is no God.”
    They are corrupt, they do abominable deeds,
    there is none that does good.
    Psalm 14:1 [RSV]

  • @benth162
    @benth162 Před 5 lety

    Intelligent Design is now being called Epi-Genetics, and it is we who are the designers. In other words we have never been separate from God, and thus that energy works through us interdimensionally I believe through what they call the Hox Gene. This is not necessarily done by our intellectualization of what we desire of our bodies, but almost as a subconscious directive by us to correct an issue that needed correction to be used effectively in this reality and location where you live in on this earth.

  • @danieldietsche2954
    @danieldietsche2954 Před 4 lety

    Common sense logic back in life science... maybe we still have a chance of self discovery.

  • @gyro5d
    @gyro5d Před 5 lety

    "The Ebner Effect".

  • @user-qx6pc8fk4h
    @user-qx6pc8fk4h Před 3 lety

    Who is Intelligent Designer? Life?

  • @asimmahmoud219
    @asimmahmoud219 Před 3 lety +2

    Atheists look to the sun claiming that it’s not there

  • @Ihsaan1c
    @Ihsaan1c Před 2 lety

    For a proper scientific explanation, just watch the videos from John Perry of Stated Clearly

  • @DimensionalGaming4
    @DimensionalGaming4 Před rokem

    New genetic information can be God creating new code. Adjusting the code to allow a better chance at survival. I wonder if we could modify our code to give us an extra membrane for our eyes (like crocodillians) and gills (like fish). Just need that code location and cut and paste where we want on our body. For example, gills on our neck where our genetic neck code is insert the gill codes there. Where our eye code is insert the extra membrane code there. Theoretically it should work like a shot. The new dna will go to where it's told and change the code to add the new function.

  • @numericalcode
    @numericalcode Před 5 měsíci

    The genetic information comes from faster reaction rates due to the proteins created. Where does THAT information come from? Hmm.