Paul Maurice Loses It After Winnipeg Jets Goal Is Overturned
Vložit
- čas přidán 9. 12. 2021
- Uploaded By: Alyssa Hope
Channel Link: / alyssahope
All rights go to the NHL. I do not own the music and the footage used in this video. For entertainment purposes only. - Sport
As a Jets fan, I agree that this is totally interference. The reason myself, and PoMo, and so many others are upset is because there seems to be absolutely zero consistency for these calls. In our game against Carolina earlier this week, Hellebuyck got spun around fully 180 degrees in his crease and it was called a good goal. The league desperately needs to figure this shit out. These calls can't be subjective upon the officials idea of what GI is. There's no room for gray area, it has to be black and white.
If you are talking about the Aho goal that was a good goal. Puck was in the crease and not covered. So its anyone game at that point. If the goalie had glove on it or under his pad in his possession it would have been interference.
@@algrundau9441 Yeah I remember that. One great one was when Jets played Vegas in the playoffs and James Neal cross checked Hellebuyck to the mask, good goal because they can't give Neal a penalty on a gi review.
@@richardturner551 also if you look closely you can see that Helly literally grabs Aho’s stick and that is the reason why he gets spun around
difference is in the Carolina game, a Jet player pushed the Hurricane player onto Hellebuyck while this one a Jet player ran into the goalie without any Canucks player pushing him toward the goalie
@@richardturner551 Actually, it WAS covered. In that game, the puck was 100% under Hellebuyck's pad before Aho did what he did- Hellebuyck even confirmed that much in the post game comments, so that was 100% goaltender interference, whereas this was not!
How come that even needed a coach challenge. Ref was positioned perfectly to see it all
Because the refs are taught to call it a good goal on the ice if it's close then rely on video review to overturn rather than the other way around. Notice it wasn't an emphatic "good goal" signal from the referee. He knew it was close, signaled goal, then let replay run its course.
@@danbradley9754 that mentality (the NHL's not yours) is problematic when there are close calls and the camera can't track the puck. Then, the referee's call stands, even if there are no physical proof of a goal, except one guy who didn't even see it in the first place and called it a good goal because he was told to. That system is due for a change, even in tennis they have ways to tell if the ball was in or out without relying on slowmotion and camera angles
Dubois pulled Demko's leg forward in a way that made it impossible for him to stretch it out and make a save
He’s pissed because I’m the prior game they interfered with the goalie so bad that it spun him right around. The call was good in Vancouver, but that’ll be why he’s upset
@Jacques 2 things
1: it’s still goal tender interference weather he could make it or not + it’s Demko there is a chance he could’ve made it and saved it
2. Are you blind? The skate clearly blocked Demko’s pad which limited his movement
That was clearly goaltender interference! Dubois was in the blue paint and wasn't pushed in
He's more upset about the non interference call by the same official in the game against carolina. He said in the post game that he wants consistency in the calls.
@@rammstein67350 yah that’s fair
Actually no- it wasn't! By NHL rules- if the puck is in motion (which it 100% was), then a player is completely allowed to be in the crease- which is why Dubois was in the crease. The puck was in motion, and it wasn't covered- so Dubois was allowed to be in the crease! Not only that, Dubois even made sure he moved his leg so that he DIDN'T interfere with Demko! That can only mean 1 thing- that this was a bullshit call that cost the Winnipeg Jets the game!
@@BigAlvideos101 But it was a clear case of Goal tender interference.
@@BigAlvideos101 This is 100% wrong. It's Rule 69 in the NHL rulebook. A puck being in motion has absolutely no relevance to goaltender interference calls. A puck being loose matters (69.7) but that only applies to rebound situations where the player is attempting to play the puck, which has nothing to do with what happened here.
Maurice does the best “FACK OFF” with the chewing gum about to pop out of his mouth. Epic
its so perfect, its gotta be a new gif meme. so good.
Well the NHL shady refs give Maurice a lot of chances to practice it.
Good call, better voice crack
I'm trying to find the voice crack when is it?!
@@j.t.miller1641 First announcement by the referee when he says "goaltender interference"
Tool
Not sure what he's upset about. That's a clear interference.
Actually no- if you watch closely, you'll see Dubois purposely moved his leg around Demko so that he wouldn't be interfered with on the goal. That's why the Jets coach was mad, because it 100% should've counted, as Dubois made sure he DIDN'T interfere with Demko! You're allowed to be in the crease if the puck was there, and it was- that's how Copp got to it!
@@BigAlvideos101 but he did make contact with Demko
iF yOu WaTcH cLoSeLy. Like it’s clearly interference regardless of intent or possibility of save. I like the Jets, but this ain’t it
@@BigAlvideos101 excuses excuses. Maybe Dubois should've went for the puck instead of running Demko over
@@MrSupahLMFAO It bounced off of his leg/foot to Copp, so he tried!
Paul is pissed about inconsistencies in these calls. The no goal was a good call, the night prior it was laughable.
Stop whining jets fan. Your team and fans are always whining about the refs.
hundred percent agree. I mean we probably would've lost that game anyway but that call was awful.
I agree. The call against Carolina was BS. This was a good call. As a Canucks fan I was surprised Maurice was so pissed at the call, but then I had one of my friends who is a Jets fan tell me about their previous game and I understand the frustration.
@@Rindiculousfun jet fans should be the last ones to criticize reffing. The refs have gone out of their way to help them.
@@davidharrow9025 I’m sorry that you’re so unhappy. Mommy loves you.
That’s interference all day, Maurice needs to grow up
Like Maurice, but every once in a while he does something like this that makes one wonder if his bubble ain't just a tad off center.
Dubois has a habit of 'running into' goaltenders
Same with Marcus Foligno.
He didn't seem that mad, I thought he was actually gonna lose it lol
When you get pissed off the refs finally called a goalie interference call correctly because hurt your team
yeah, because the refs didn't call a goalie interference call correctly that also hurt the Jets.
Getting mad at inconsistencies makes perfect sense
@@immaleaf4964 difference is in the Carolina game, a Jet player pushed the Hurricane player onto Hellebuyck while this one a Jet player ran into the goalie without any Canucks player pushing him toward the goalie. Don't forget Hellebuyck was holding onto Aho's stick during that play too. Plus you can see Demko was trying to slide across to the ride side after the pad save but Dubois pushed Demko to the left
@@MrSupahLMFAO Carolina wasn't pushed by a Jet, what are you talking about? It wasn't even the guys body that pushed Helly, it was his stick, which Hellebuyck wasn't holding. Demko hadn't started sliding or started to try to slide right, it was still goalie interference, but you are making up a lot of shit for no reason
@@MrSupahLMFAO Jets player didn't push Aho.
I just watched this for Maurice 😂😂😂😂
This guy is too hilarious
He's not that mad. I was expecting sticks broken against the boards and stuff flying all over the place...
I'm a jets fan and yes that is goalie intereference.To say he "probably " wouldn't have stopped it anyway is a poor argument.With the intereference he was left with 0% chance.
No it's not. Dubois moved his leg around Demko so that it wouldn't be goaltender interference, so to say anything else is completely and utterly asinine. Also, Demko had a 0% chance of stopping that puck anyway- even if Dubois hadn't have been in the crease on that play- which when going by NHL rules- he was 100% allowed to be, as the puck was still in motion!
@@BigAlvideos101 0% chance of stopping it is not an argument. Also Dubois clearly did not move his leg around. He had already ran into him. lol
@@BigAlvideos101 Danny literally just said that saying that "the goalie wouldn't have even stopped it anyway," is a lazy and bad argument. Stop using it. You're making yourself look bad.
@@JaneNayes Well, Danny is an idiot, so anything he says can NOT be taken seriously whatsoever!
@@BigAlvideos101 DO NOT SAY THAT. DANNY IS NOT AN IDIOT. HOW DARE YOU
That's the old accidentally on purpose play and if it happened to Comrie, Maurice would be screaming interference
If it was the other way around it would be a goal
It’s a good call, Dubois is a spaz and needs to reign himself in.
"Fly off, fly off, fly right off!" is what I think he said ....
Pomo isn't mad because of the GI here. He's mad at the inconsistency after a pretty egregious GI during the Jets Canes game was called off.
Stop whining jets fan. Too much whining from the jets and their players.
Yup
To all the people saying why Maurice was upset? Here’s why
1) When Jets played Hurricanes, a player ran into Hellebuyck and got no penalty yet it was a goal but for the jets it was
2) Demko would not have saved it even if he wasn’t interfered
3) Finally, he always complains lol
You dont know about number 2 though. He could have gotten his paddle on it if Dubois had not made contact and messed up his rotation. Plus he is in the crease so touching the goalie constitutes goalie interference since he skates into him without being pushed or boxed in.
@@oliverbrubacher9608 maybe a good save just like when he (demko) like went McDavid mode against Panarin
i watched the hurricanes game and have no clue what you are referring to
@@dustinkerrigan7964 when Hellebuyck gets literally spun in a circle. Caused by one of the hurricane players pushing his pad with his stick and spinning him around until the puck slid in. Refs are beyond inconsistent and it's frustrating.
Good summary
The thumbnail 😂😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Real clever thumbnail by the way I enjoy your videos keep up the good work and also you're not that bad at Goalie
Now I get why Maurice resigned lol
This is pure click bait. Maurice was upset by the call but he didn't even come close to "losing it".
He had no reason to be upset over the call. It was clear goalie interference. Jets are WHINERS. Every game they're whining about the refs.
“Fuck off! Fuck right off!”
Don't go reading lips, kids!!!!
Well...you could argue that Demko left his crease...
are you colour blind? the blue ice is the crease
wh is there a specsavers ad
Just let anything be a goal lol the
goalies have like 20 pounds of protection on anyways
A play that shouldn't even require a challenge smh
Paul Maurice needs to chill out
Looks like Paul Maurice has aged 20 years in 2 years time
The Canucks need to get rid of those blue/green jerseys. They've been around for a long time now, and they're just hideous. Seeing them for the past 12+ years has dampened my enthusiasm for the team.
I love Maurice and am very glad that he is our coach
Our?? You play for the jets?
What has he done for you?
WHY? He’s a bad coach, let’s his emotions overcome the ability to think logically and clearly.
So many comments about him not making it back to the net, and I agree that it would have been unlikely. But bc he was interfered with, then there was no possibility, so the hypothetical doesn’t matter. If Dubois wasn’t in that spot it would have counted. Interference isn’t always on purpose.
You consider that losing it? That's nothing
Are the Jets still laughing?
Jets are the new Bruins
And now he’s not the coach
Thumbnail: when u bout to bust.
no goAl
God I'm sick of Maurices face can he retire already. What is he even mad about? That was absolutely textbook interference
The actual definition of goaltender interference. Maurice is a bum.
Dubois and the puck were in the paint, albeit briefly, at the same time. The contact was incidental, which is legal and the goal should have been allowed. Bad call.
A blind man could see that interference.
You should do a video on the crowd in Colorado singing all the small thing by Blink 182! Its hilarious
Done :)
-Alyssa Hope
Wait. You're telling me the officiating in the NHL isn't all that good aside from a select few officials? No way!!!!!!!
This was the right call.
Also it's not this wasn't the officials' call
You can't seriously tell me, with a straight face, that wasn't goaltender interference.
Haha PoMo's blind, knew that after the Calgary-win series.
PLD fault, he should've broken his stick over Demkos head. NHL has proven that doing that is not goaltender interference in the past 😁
“… Loses it”?
Too funny. But it is interference. Had no time to react to the rebound
Eh, I don't see how that's controversial. Bruins fan here, so no skin in the game. But like, if that isn't goaltender interference, than I don't know what is. The impact kept him from resetting and left his left side wide open
The jets coaching staff and players often behave like this towards the officials. They have a persecution complex.
For someone who claims they don’t have a skin in the fight - you sure posted a lot of comments on multiple threads and videos about it. Me thinks you a closet canuck - or fan of a rival team of the jets in the central.
@@johnyule1614 okay
Jets won this game hands down
But they didn’t
Enjoy ur two non existent point then
This is what you consider "losing it"? He barely even yelled lmao
Maybe I'm bad at lip-reading, but weren't there three f-bombs dropped in that short clip?
NHL will consider it "losing it."
Watch him get fined like Brind'Amour did for his verbal tirade.
That is definitely interference..
1000% good call. Didnt mean to but still touche the goalie in the blue
Deff goaltender interference but no way Demko was saving that anyway
Doesn’t matter. He couldn’t make an attempt when Dubois is teabagging him.
“Fack off” is losing it?…
Jets lose it after goal is overturned ;-)
Saying F off three times is losing it? Ok
Would Demko have made the save otherwise? I'm not sure he would based on positioning. Still goaltender interference either way but it's a thought.
I mean he could have Hasek'ed it.....but yeah you're probably right.
Good thing he takes a lot of his anger out on that gum
Don’t see how demko would have stopped that without the interference
It doesn't matter. The interference gave him 0%. You need to give goalies an attempt to save it atleast. As per the rules.
That's not the point.
I wonder what he was saying...
Anyone think Quinn maybe just overplays defense? Doesn’t stop and look around?. Can’t figure out why he struggles defensively
I don' t see how that could have been more obviously goaltender interference...idk what Paul Maurice is upset about.
Listen, was the goalie interfered with? Yes. If he weren't interfered with, would he have had a chance to make the save? No way. Therefore, this logically, should be a goal as the goaltender would not have made the save anyways... But the NHL are pros at defying logic day in and day out
goaltender interference is goaltender interference full stop. The refs called this one as the rule is written (unusual). And Demko is not able to move to his left for a couple of seconds because of Dubois, his chances of making the save went from low, to impossible. That's why it's the right call.
@@CanadaBlue85 Dubois moved his leg around Demko- thus nullifying any sort of goaltender interference that was there. Your argument is irrelevant!
@@BigAlvideos101 his leg made contact whether he tried to move it or not. You clearly do not know what hell you are talking about. Are you denying that contact was made? Do you think that "oh I tried not to hit him" would be an acceptable defense? As far bone-headed and dead wrong takes on a hockey play I've seen, you take the cake. Absolute joke.
@@CanadaBlue85 But his leg never made contact, as Dubois moved it away from Demko before it ever made contact with him! I saw that from the moment the play first happened, so unlike you- I know EXACTLY what I'm talking about! Even more so now that I've re-watched the replay at least 50 000 times so that I could make extra certain I was right! Bet you didn't see THAT coming, now did you- Little Miss Know-It-All?
@@CanadaBlue85 Exactly. Chad is right on this one.
Leaf fans are smiling everywhere.
No they're not! Their dirty, disgusting player got what he deserved for making such a filthy head shot on a vulnerable, innocent player, and they're lucky that Spezza only got 6 games, as he should've gotten WAY more than that, as he could've ended Pionk's career!
@@BigAlvideos101 your argument does not change my opinion.
@@NanovisionOnTwitch It's not even an argument- it's 100% FACT! There's a difference there- a HUGE one!
@@BigAlvideos101 ok, let me take a moment to read The Big Book of Facts so I can brush up on mine.. if that makes you feel better. If it doesn't, try adding some whiskey to your coffee this morning and I guarantee you'll have a much nicer day.
@@NanovisionOnTwitch I don't drink alcohol or coffee, but thanks!
Perfect vall
“Fack off!! Fack right off!! Fack me!” 😂
Its this easy, no more confusion over goalie interference.... "No one in the blue paint,any part of a player in the crease its goalie interfrence" period.
Even though there is contact, with or without it the outcome would have been the same. The goalie could have never recovered in time to make a save. Basically because of contact it gave the referees an option to call interference.
You're smart.
The fact that needed a coach's challenge is the problem. Multiple officials on ice and Toronto central office...should be enough 😵😵😵🤬
As a Preds fan, I'm still pissed about the Duchene offsides goal several years ago even now Poile finally acquired that white whale for our lineup 🤣
what is maurice whining about exactly? Dubois CLEARLY interfered with demko
Voice crack lol
Ya that was a good call, if he hadn’t been in the crease it would have been a good goal but in the crease like he was it was definitely goalie interference ….no goal…..👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼
I have a lot of respect for Paul Maurice’s coaching resume but what about this got him so upset? Sometimes he is animated over things that are grey but this was obviously not a goal.
Actually, it was 100% a goal! Dubois didn't even interfere with Demko- in fact, he even moved his leg around him so that it wouldn't be goaltender interference! Also, as per NHL rules, he had every right to be in the crease on that play anyway, as the puck was still in motion. If the puck's in motion like that, you're allowed to be in the crease!
@@BigAlvideos101 LOL, He clearly made contact with Demko, you need to put down the pipe bro.
inconsistency with the interference calls
What part of his coaching do you respect? The fact that he has he most losses by any coach in NHL history?
how is that not goaltender interference?
Goaltender interference, no question.
How is that goalie interference if you're not in the crease?
The goalie had no chance even if he didn’t get interfered with a little bit
Maurice is probably my favourite coach because of he's a hot head but that was clearly interference.
And he's lost more games than any other coach.
He ran the goalie Maurice. PLD is such a dirty player.
imagine that a jet running a goalie, big surprise.
Why does he ALWAYS chew gum during the game?? Correct me if I'm wrong but I believe he's the only coach in the NHL that does that lol
Aggression management.. try chewing gum when you are really angry..
Its cut and dry.. he skates through the blue paint and hits the goaltender.. then the puck is shot in
Obvious goalie interference
I think he is just mad because the officiating isn't going his way
Jets never winning a cup
Not as long as Paul is coaching.
Wow the jets are always whining to the refs. I've never seen a team whine this much.
Yet no whinning against the Leafs. Oh that's right, cause everything was in their favor. Jets are getting really bad this year with this crap. The only time they're not complaining to the ref is when everything goes their way.
I can see why Maurice is upset. Demko clearly initiated contact but he was trying to make a save so I think it's the right call
Maurice is such a child.
Good goal- Dubois made sure he moved his leg out of Demko's way so that it wouldn't be goaltender interference- with is why this was a 100% biased, bullshit anti-Winnipeg call! He was allowed to be in the crease when the puck is in there, and it was- that's how Copp got to the puck! The refs screwed over the Jets on this play for sure, and it cost them the game as a result. Shame on the damn refs.
idk what you're looking at but dubois definitely did not try to move his leg out of the way. Easily goaltender interference
@@TheFrodoBaggins33 I don't know how YOU'RE blind enough to have missed it, as I saw it on every single replay, as well as on the original play when it happened! Dubois purposely moved his leg around Demko so that it wouldn't be goaltender interference, and even if he wouldn't have done that- there was NO WAY Demko would've been able to make the save on that play anyway! That means only one thing- it's a good goal- no ifs, ands, or buts! It's not MY fault you're blind and can't see it!
@@BigAlvideos101 his leg clearly makes contact with demko's and causes it to move, obstructing demko's ability to make the save, THEN he tries to move his leg around Demko. It's clear as day, perception bias be strong though
you could not be more blinded by your own bias. Just take a look at the other comments from rational Jets fans on this video. Laughable.
@@TheFrodoBaggins33 No, Dubois never did anything until then, and even if he did- like I said- the puck was in motion, and the NHL rules CLEARLY state that if the puck is in motion, you're allowed to be in the crease! There's also the fact that Demko would NOT have made the save regardless of whether Dubois was there or not! So, none of that even remotely matters! The Jets got screwed on this one! It's not even a debate anymore!
Idk wtf hes mad about, learn hockey buddy, tf are you doing behind the bench, that was clearly goalie interference all fucking day, ref shoulda waved the goal off as soon as it went in
what is he on? literally blatant interference whether he meant to or not
If Maurice is not fined than this league is fucked. Same as RDA for the Canes.
fined for what
@@immaleaf4964 Google ffs n come to your own conclusion.
@@deliman9710 Hmmmm. Google says you're an idiot because it's not the same thing. My conclusion is google is right
@@immaleaf4964 damn - did you have to murder him like that hahaha
Paul Maurice should be suspended for 5 games for use of unnecessary language. Does he not understand he's on TV and there are young kids watching.
Dubois is a very lazy player.
Paul Maurice is the worst coach in NHL history.
Loserpeg
I will never forget the guy that calls winnipeg loserpeg. Man, it hurts so much even to think about it! I won't be able to sleep tonight
Jets fans are awful