How Homo Erectus Took Over the World ~ with DR KAREN BAAB
Vložit
- čas přidán 16. 06. 2024
- They were the most successful hominids of all time, existing on earth for almost two million years and leaving fossil evidence across much of the globe. From Africa to the Caucasus to the Far East, Homo erectus travelled far and left an indelible mark on prehistory.
DR KAREN BAAB is a biological anthropologist studying human evolution at Midwestern University in Glendale, Arizona, USA. Her main areas of research are the evolutionary history of Plio-Pleistocene Homo and what the shape of their skulls can tell us. MARK from Evolution Soup welcomes Dr Baab back to talk all things Homo erectus.
#humanevolution #evolution #homoerectus
00:00 START
05:14 Homo Erectus Description
09:37 Homo Erectus Evolution
13:00 Dmanisi Erectus Fossil Site
18:58 Homo Erectus Variation
26:13 Homo Erectus Migration
33:11 Homo Ergaster
38:28 Homo Erectus Uniqueness
LINKS FOR DR KAREN BAAB:
SITE: www.karenbaab.com/
RESEARCHGATE: www.researchgate.net/profile/...
Concerning Hobbits (interview with Karen Baab): bit.ly/39BXwlV
SEE ALSO:
Midwestern University: www.midwestern.edu/
Bone Clones - Fossil reproductions: boneclones.com/
Paleo Sculpture by Elisabeth Daynes: www.daynes.com/
Thumbnail art by Julio Lacerda:
Insta: @lacerda.julio
Art: www.deviantart.com/julio-lace...
PALEO RECONSTRUCTIONS:
Elisabeth Daynes - www.daynes.com/
Kim Seong-mun / Jeongok Prehistory Museum
Interviews powered by streamyard.com/
#evolutionsoup #evolution #paleo #paleontology #paleoartist #Homosapiens #hominid #artwork #Darwin #cave #bone #fossils #Neanderthal #australopithecus #hominin #extinct #animals #science #anthropology #paleoanthropology #hobbits #species #africa #skull #skulls #naturalselection #lucy #paleontology #homoerectus
---------------
SUBSCRIBE to Evolution Soup: bit.ly/2pUOYSb
FOLLOW Evolution Soup Instagram & Twitter! @evolution_soup
Merchandise: www.redbubble.com/people/evol...
SUBSCRIBE to the Podcast! evolutionsoup.buzzsprout.com [RSS feed: feeds.buzzsprout.com/354743.rss]
Shop at our store! www.redbubble.com/people/evol...
In association with Talk Beliefs CZcams Channel: bit.ly/2lA6YOv
DISCLAIMER:
Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.
Creative Commons.
Just fantastic! Thank you for sharing such valuable knowledge to us all.
Hi
Yea they are all
@@ponderosa100 posted
@@ponderosa100😅😅😅😅
The narrator and guest work well together. He asks intelligent, pertinent questions and lets the articulate expert answer without interruption. Rare and most appreciated.
She articulated this better than any scientist or any science communicator I've ever seen articulate something like this. I mean that genuinely.
She is such a good presenter. She explains a complex issue in a detailed but accessible way.
34:46 Great Image. I met the Turkana Boy when I was in Naiobi 20 years ago. Well, I stood in front of him. Fasinating! I also met the man who found him, he was then appointed a curator at the Naiobi Natural History Museum. The lady Director of the Museum was walking past, saw my interest and asked me if I would like to meet the Turkana Boy's discoverer, which I really did want to! Such a beautiful and humble man. I think the beautiful Turkanya Boy died of blood poisoning from some tooth abscesses, fell/laid down into Lake Turkanya and was covered by silt until this time.
What a marvellous trip to Kenya I had!
Sounds like a wonderful trip!
Given how widespread they were in such a dangerous time, I think we underestimate how hard Homo erectus really was.
Wonderful chat, appreciated her knowledge and passion, and she kind of looks like Drew Barrymore. Thanks to you both for an educational and enjoyable video.
I was trying to think what celebrity she resembles, Drew is it!
That’s funny, Kimberly!😊👋🏼
En français: l’exposé le plus clair que j’ai entendu sur le sujet. Bravo pour la clarté et la profondeur des explications. Fascinant!
This is a wonderful, informative Q&A. Extremely well done, and Mark is the paragon of an interviewer - totally prepared. I especially appreciated the discussion of potential climatic selection, the frontal bone, and facial structure beginning at 17:13 . The discussion of variation of Homo morphology across regions, and across time, is explicitly pointed out. Also, note the carefulness of how Prof. Baab presents the information, particularly in how it can be interpreted in more than one way. I suspect she is an excellent instructor. Many thanks for this. Wow! - Larry, San Diego.
You two did an amazing job parsing out a fuzzy, complicated subject! I could listen to Dr Baab speak all day! Found you on Instagram, thought I’d check out your CZcams channel, definitely subscribing. Cheers!
Great to have you on-board! I've just released a fun interview with a paleobotanist about ancient plants. Next week - an extinctions expert.
Oh I needed this …..)
Been bingeing everything on human anthropology for 2 years and really needed this incredibly detailed summary on erectus to help put the pieces together
🤙🏼 thank you..
Thank you so much. It's tempting to just do a series of images with voice-over but I really do like listening to the experts. :-)
Yeah she was awesome’
Both of you, pleasure to listen to great questioning
I’ve since dived in to your Channel a bit more. Great stuff thanks
@@EvolutionSoup And a sense of humour too :)
Love this. Simple discussion and information... Without the annoying distracting music that ruins so many youtube videos.
Thank you so much. Although somewhat pressured to do more flashy, snappily-edited videos, I think the information takes precedence.
@@EvolutionSoup superb job. The light and friendly atmosphere of the discussion is all most people need.
Dr. Karen Baab makes all this complex information easy to follow. Love it. Thanks Doc!
Thank you so much; about fifteen years ago, I read a fascinating, peer-reviewed article regarding the ginger gene in Homo Neanderthal and Homo Sapiens and their implications. I’d been interested in paleo anthropology but that absolutely hooked me and I’ve been in love with it ever since. Australopithecines and H Floresiensis have my very gooey bits❤️. I just discovered your channel, so you’ll probably see me in the comments section frequently.
Very well done by Dr. Baab and @Evolution Soup. I learned so much today! 😃
That was so interesting. Thank you for the opportunity to listen and watch!
Excellent interview as the host gives the floor to a highly expert lady who speaks so fluently
How well explained by Dr. Baab this was. Very clearly discussed. Thank you
Dr. Baab is such an excellent speaker, wonderful talk, thanks.
Yes, it's not easy to find someone who will give this amount of scientific information for almost 45 minutes without making listeners tired or uninterested
A truly excellent exposition of a complex subject by two fine scientific minds. I learned a great deal, thank you Dr Baab.
Enjoyed this presentation very much. More Dr Baab please.
I found this talk fascinating. It would be nice if Dr. K. Baab would write a book on hominid evolution.
Dr. Baal did a fantastic job clearing up some questions I had on my favorite hominid!
I really appreciated getting the latest info on things like "perhaps Turkana Boy was somewhat incorrectly reassembled; and that the ribs and pelvis might have wider, more primitive relationships than originally thought." And that a recently discovered pelvis of the same species shows this wider, more flared setting of the pelvis. So cutting edge and cool. Thank you so much for your in-depth interviews.
Didn’t they expand by following the Mediterranean coasts, exploiting shoreline seafood resources? Or was that early sapiens, I can’t remember. It’s so nice to hear from not only a true expert scientist, but one who is such an effective teacher. She doesn’t bury us in scientific lingo, but nor does she dumb down. She reminds me of the great advice I got as a young scientist, to write and speak for the intelligent, but uniformed, listener or reader. Later in my career, when I was doing lot of editing, I rejected a some reports and papers because they were unintelligible to an itelligent person who just wasn’t learned in that specialty, even other scientists from the same board field. Most scientists, I think, underestimate the comprehension and intelligence of non-scientists. Or, others try to impress by using highly specific, technical language. Every science communication, spoken or written, should be this sparse, elegant and clear!
Actually none of the species did, even Homo Sapiens. They all tended to go east at first, so much that our species "discovered" Australia 10,000 years before they entered Europe. Towards the rising Sun for some reason, it seems. Also they were not so much bound by the seashore, but by fresh drinkable water. Even the Dmanisi remains talked about in this video were in the neighbourhood of a river, not the Black Sea.
Right, I've read that coastal journey too, I have long wondered how much that seafood with the omega oils helped to promote brain development
Skimming the coasts of Java and Bali over a million years ago - musta been fantastic!
We are so fortunate to have scholars such as this lady sharing their knowledge on the internet.
The high level of self-awareness that we humans possess including that of the inevitability of our death, both builds us up and drags us down - is a blessing and a curse.
There is some evidence that Neanderthals too prepared ritual burial plots for their deceased. RIP to all - Rest in Peace/Pieces?
It’s amazing how much variance occurs just within one species. Contemporary humans are statistically taller than our relatives just 100 years ago.
Now apply that over hundreds of thousands and millions of years.
Very informative an illuminating on such a broadly distributed and varied species. Thanks to both.
Superb. Thank you creators, thank you algorithm.
Very interesting presentation! "Pithecanthropus" means "Apeman", not "apelike". The same composite word (pithecus = ape + anthropus = man) is still in use in Greek, with exactly the same meaning.
Thanks for sharing!
Thank you for clarifying. I love that about using greek and Latin for our science. I hate how we name illnesses and discoveries after people. I mean .. it's nice and all to honor the person but a disease like "Lou Gehrig's disease" tells us absolutely nothing unless you know who Lou was and what happened to him.
Thank you for this wonderful interview - I enjoyed it immensely ! 👍
Thank you for the informative and interesting presentation!
Excellent interview. Thank you Mark and Karen.
In the documentary Planet Of The Apemen: Battle For Earth, there was a scene where they talked about the Asian Erectus being unable to throw a spear because its shoulders were not like ours.
If we have homoerectus finds from as little as 100,000 years ago would be interesting to know if we've been looking for any surviving DNA.
I think it will happen but so far the DNA is not viable enough, I believe.
@@EvolutionSoup hhu
@@EvolutionSoup uhuhhu
U
Scientists have identified a stretch of our DNA that appears to be from an archaic ancestor. That stretch could indeed be from Homo erectus but it could also be introgression from another ancestral species.
Very enjoyable conversation!
I think there has been a clear reversal in that whole "increase-in-brain-size" thing recently.
Great contribution. Many thanks. I already subscribed!!!
The sea level was much much lower because of the huge ice caps, so rather than an archipelago Indonesia would be a land mass connected directly to Asia. This made it much easier to reach distant areas, but also means large parts of their habitat is now submerged.
It was very interesting to hear about the taxonomy debate. It is odd that almost two million years of human development is classified as one species, while modern hss, neanderthals, denisovans and florensis are counted as 4 just in the last half million. Probably denisovans and neanderthals should be called sub species, but when we ourselves are involved emotions arise.
There are many more
Time alone doesn't define speciation. Species are human categories to begin with as in reality genotypic and phenotypic differences are on a gradient and not on either side of a tidy line of demarcation. Chris Stringer's work on archaic introgression really illuminates the subject.
Really, really good. Best "lecture out there. I'll watch more. I think she might be one of the best
Thank you Dr Baab for the great talk!
Thanks for editing for clarity.
Also: Hybridization should be considered as a factor in H. Erectus / Ergaster variation.
No
This is really good, my man please upgrade your mic though!
Excellent!!
Thank you ~
The size of people varies with their living conditions ... especially their diet. So the findings may not been typical for the generation or place.
In Europe, after the last wars, this has become clear to this day. Variations of Homo Erectus can appear within a short time if dietary factors change. In addition, migratory movements can lead to erroneous assumptions about membership. Finds scattered around the world and differing in time for many thousands of years ... rather testify to further (not yet found) distribution and repeated settlement of particularly suitable locations. The long history of Ohalo ii up to the present day (13k years) already testifies to considerable advance development (hierarchy, structural engineering, logistics) through the spread of settlements of similar character ... But that is only a short wink regarding the time of existence of homo erectus. The social and thus genetic connections only become clearer with greater statistical significance over more finds.
Great work 😁
That was fascinating
Thank you for posting. This was a well present question and answer. What I don’t understand is how a skull cap can lead us to posit an upright creature.
The implied differences that occured within the Homo erectus spicies itself ie the Asien group vs the African group would explain why Erectus perished and died out.
The African group evolved into anatomically modern man around 300 ky. Perhaps earlier during the Ice Age in Eurasia, Homo Erectus outside of Africa underwent significant changes to evolve into Heidelbergensis, Neanderthals and Denisovan. The dead end of Erectus then died out for lack of food.
Clever lady. Her knowledge is very impressive.
Thank you both
Could the browbone adapt to a more prominent shape to shade the eyes better in a sunnier climate? Or to protect the eyes from cold and snow? This last one is prompted by knowing a few otherwise high-latitude trait (tall, long head and body, very light blue-eyed blondes), Europeans with extremely prominent browbones for modern humans. Or could this just be from a higher percentage of Neanderthal genes? I know all Eurasians have some, mostly western Eurasians.
Great stuff.
Second time I have watched it. I would love to know a bit about the skulls on the cabinet in the background. Why those two? Left Skull Homo Sapien? Right side Erectus? (the viewers left and right not hers).
If Homo erectors is estimated to have been in Java for maybe 100,000 years then it’s not hard to imagine that the aboriginal Australians may well be the descendants of homo rectus also, and that Australia is perhaps likely to have been inhabited much much longer than 65,000 years.
Well done!
Excellent, informative talk.
Very interesting
Nice. Thanks.
Thank you!
hey y’all, i’m really interested in biological anthropology and paleoanthropology does anyone have any university recommendations
where i could pursue that?
I have some recommendations but best you choose from an article like this one: askwonder.com/research/leading-institutions-paleoanthropology-xmcrfbsd4
Simply amazing!!!tank you!!
Tanked
Very interesting and nice! 😍
Could the Dmanisi hominins be the ancestors of homo floresiensis?
As a biologist I find it interesting that the Sanskrit Vedas say humanity is 2.4Million years old, which would make homo erectus human.
Something else I find odd is that it's claimed that two gorillas chromosomes fused in humans or human ancestor when it makes a lot more sense physically speaking for a chromosome to split. That means multiple people had to have that same genetic mutation with a fusion of chromosomes at least one of each sex in order for them to produce children that also had it.
One of the major outliers of the H. erectus line seems to be the population in Georgia with more primitive characteristics. That suggests to me that they may have undergone the earliest migration of the species out of east Africa and then became isolated from the rest of the H. erectus line, eventually dying out. If so, then there must have been several migratory episodes out of Africa to the east - and at least one back to east Africa to account for the more advanced form of the species found there. Apparently H. erectus may also have had immigration issues that we face!!! Lol!!!
Thank you . . Fascinating. . 👍👍
This is what I call science. Excellent!
I count that the foot fits perfectly between inner elbow and wrist to determan most an anatomicly modern human. Do u know a sciantific basis for this theory?
Nice video thanks, very interesting. Oh btw, your guest looks a little like Drew Barrymore
Why? White people came from Africa.
Noone talks about the toba eruption, i think thats the cause for the homo sapien bottleneck that happened at the time and the reason homosapiens were able to travel the world as i believe it greatly decreased the population of of archaic humans allowing our ancestor to move into thier land with more safety and allowing them to keep there genenome mostly homosapien as there were less archaic humans (to breed with) in the area after the eruption.
What an impressively brilliant and beautiful woman!
Interesting
Tell her she would have a great channel on her own talking about this stuff!
Not 100% sure, but I believe she has a CZcams channel.
There are links for Dr karen Baab in the description box.
great stuff spread the word about channel !
Thanknyou
Perhaps Homo erectus had not developed the 'science' of lighting fires to cook their meat. Raw meat is very tough and so strong jaw muscles would be required - hence the muscle anchorage ridges
at the back of their heads. When Hominins had developed the technique of lighting fires, their skulls would become more gracile - or child-like - as in H. heidelbergensis. The uplifting of the forehead into a vertical position could have also been part of this neotenic development.
I think it’s generally accepted that H. Erectus cooked their food with fire, based on the evidence. They were the first hominins to do so.
Thank you
Disappointed the interviewer didn’t ask how Erectus migrated to islands such as Java. Did they have boats?
Land masses were different.
It's simple. No one knows.
He just stood up for himself.
There was a major ice age right after a warning period just like now but 120k yrs ago... It takes a while to come out of a major ice age and the first evidence of villages is 84 plus thousand years ago... Which would have been about the time we were finally coming out of the Ice Age. Homo erectus barely made it to the end of the Ice Age.
Genetic data is skewed at about 100k yrs back because of all the genetic bottlenecks we've had but mainly the Ice Age every 100-120k yrs.
17:46 if Erectus was at high altitude in China then how to they relate to Denisovians whom we know had genetic adaptation to low oxygen/high altitude
What about Tautavel ?
37:34-37:50 ... and then the homo erectus form returned to the hills of the (*) a couple hundred years ago.
* fill in your favorite
Ozarks, Appalachians, ...
“The frontal bone could reflect an adaptation to climate?” How? How is the size and shape of one’s brow reflective of climate? How does a thicker frontal bone help or harm one’s reaction to the weather? How? Tell me, I want to know!
Homo sapiens may never achieve the level of success that Homo Erectus achieved and sustained for ten times longer than we’ve even been around.
It’s fascinating that it appears our ancestors gradually developed the human form long before they ever developed the human brain. Fortunately, our ancestors became more attractive before they became, “self aware!”
i just wander if there are any signs of erectus interbreeding with more modern human species
Cool, I didn't know Drew Barrymore was also an anthropologist
Came to giggle at "homo erectus"
Stayed for the film
Is it possible that homo erectus saw Uranus?
What if the Dimanisi "Homo Erectus" individuals aren't actually Homo Erectus, but the transitional hominid between Homo Habilis/Advanced Australopithecus and Homo Erectus, since Homo Erectus already existed in Africa at the time, couldn't it be a relic population. The features such as brain size, and body size isn't quite proper Homo Erectus, so maybe they actually aren't. They are exactly what one would expect with a transitional species. So, why is there this push to have them be fully Homo Erectus as opposed to a new transitional species on it's way to Erectus?
Oh, shock horror😱. We can't have hominids all over the place. We need to have them in boxes with absolute divisions and labels on them. Otherwise we can't deal with them!🤓😆🤣
I wonder if the homo sapien mixed with Homo erectus the same way they mixed with neanderthal ?
Gibbons and Orangutans are bipedal. Humans are also excellent tree climbers. These things used to separate us from the other apes, but we know THAT is not the major difference. The difference is that mankind is the one that strays from ways of his ancestors.
Not excellent but good . We're built for running and walking .
Arizona is in the Southwest US, not the Midwest
enjoyable show!
It see.s,,that from Pithecanthropus were going two lines one to Altaj Mountains which are untill now not much reserached for fossils, and
a second stream known in western anthropology.
Very interesting and balanced talk. Quite refreshing amongst all the trash on CZcams.
Would you consider the tools used by Homo floresiensis to be Oldowan tools?
Thank you both for sharing your knowledge and time with us!
So sorry about the troll who follows your videos just so he/she can hit the thumbs down.
Buybull thumpers got all the answers.
Great job. There's particularly salient thought displayed here. No lose ends except those recognized.
Can't we look at existing species to see how much variation triggers a new species?
inendated with scam commercials . Good show .