Video

Two hearts 💕 living in a separate world 🌎 Human and mankind Human are heru or Horus Mankind are neanderthal Human are hue Mankind are apes Human are black people Mankind are white Arab Chinese India and other 😅. Planet of apes 😮

Wow now I have even more questions aaaaaaaaa….. Great show wonderful stuff

Humans didn't evolve into existence.

I would want to take all of the courses Dr. Cofran teaches were I a student. His response to questions was amazingly articulate, kind to non-scientists, and information dense. This is the first CZcams talk in a long time when I have not increased the speed to 1.25 or 1.5 because thoughts were not concisely conveyed. I wanted to have a backup button to listen again and again to all the new information. Great video!

Homo Naledi did not control fire.

Just starting this video, it seems to me that brain growth was driven by stone tool making, and then facilitated more complex social interactions, which may have resulted in a feedback mechanism of social complexity and brain growth. Stone tool making requires one to imagine the structure of the stone and the precise angles to strike it to get what you have envisioned. I have tried my hand at flint tool making and it is tough.

Self-domestication is incorrect.

Neanderthals were not symbolic. All those sights mentioned can be linked to modern humans.

Finally another one!

37:00 The inuit people and Native Americans of the higher latitudes are great examples of this, too.

14:03 Christians have the Sacrement of blood and body, so they really shouldn't be so surprised...

50:48 maybe that has something to do with axillary and pubic hair in humans? Sweat glands and hair, and lactation are linked. Maybe something derived?

Homo erectus evolved into what we call bigfoot,we would be with them if our dna wasnt changed to be intelligent enough to dig up gold for a dying planet,says bashar

"We know that the origin of homo sapiens is in Europe" How do we know that?

Horrible beginning. Nobody clicks on this video to learn about Billy.

This man up right man had skills enough skills to thrive as hunter gather and smart enough to be around for longer and most importantly one very powerful and flexible and adaptable person so making tools and weapons leading to be most successful species of homo

I watched this episode last year,and I am here to rewatch it ❤ love it And I also read Jeremy's book

I forgot the name of the channel And I had to go through all my watch later videos I finally found it 🎉❤

Film flam man!!

I feel like the Patterson Gimlin film might help answer some of these questions, MK Davis has done some great work regarding the locomotion of the creature

Whooaaa ... just had a strange thought. What if, instead of island dwarfism, the hobbits had experienced island gigantism?

Can you pitch this Idea that instead of oversized featherless Velociraptors, maybe use Gorgonopsids in the next movie? Just show them the majestic beast here and there, oh sorry, I messed up the new pictures. that is another big carnivore from 260 million years ago. Or my kid just drew this Gorgonopsid, they were the apex predator of their time before dinosaurs, very good-looking, and he loves them, he says they are just like Bagheera the black panther in Jungle Book, oh no, the good one 67 Disney animation. You know they could kill a Velociraptor in a fair fight.. Something along this line, maybe we'll have a Gorgonopsid by the fifth move.

Inference. Consider the genetic evidence estimating when head lice separated from crab lice, which mostly survive in pubic hair. Their divergence (and divergence is largely allopatric. It OS doubtful that the dovergence occurred sympatrically) indicates the period when hominins ceased to have contiguois fur over the body. A paleoanthropologist suggested adaptive characteristics of long head hair and hairlessnes, in traveling across water, with infants hanging on. To litle evidence, of course, though the water-borne parasites, no matter the vectors, , the melanocytes, etc. can hypothetically add evidence to our ancestors being unconstrained by rivers, etc. whereas our closest social primate relatives do not do that. Back to video, as inference can be derived from phenotype variation. More concrete evidence is necessary, but Darwin, Wallace others had to work from inference.

Should have named him chocolate man.

"VertigoPolitix - The Faulty Science Behind Cheddar Man"

Woman in the thumbnail looks like haplogroup C type Australian aboriginal

You can tell when one is passionate about something the whole energy glows! ❤

I like the way you don't assume that couplings with Neanderthals wasn't necessarily peaceful and consenting. There is a middle-class bias amongst many historians. People living for millenia at the edge of existence, are unlikely to have been pleasant and polite. I expect that the advantage modren humans had over the Neanderthals, was a much greater capacity for cunning and violence. Traits, that kept modren humans on the move, seeking out unpopulated territories away from the aggression of their own kind.

I have not seen the book but from this video it sounds a bit " hit and miss "to me ??

He was an olive skinned, bearded, wavy haired North Atlantic Native American from 9,000 years ago whose relatives & descendants are almost exclusively only among North Native American Indian tribes. *That's who Kennewick is*

If man did evolve, then language should have evolved too. Language experts say thete is no language ever found that is primitive as from animal sounds. Linguist experts say language is language no matter were its from or time period.

Well, the iceman found in the Austrian Alps was also dark brown with blue eyes. I believe he was older than cheddar man.

The Japanese eat lots of fish and have light skin. Also, Cheddar man was a descendant of the modern humans that came out of Africa about 80,000 years ago. That is almost 70,000 years of 'out of Africa' humans not being under an African sun. Non African Modern humans that still retain dark skin are in Southern India and the Australian Aboriginals.

When modern man (Africans) arrived in Europe, there were no modern Europeans ("whites") in Existence, only the Neanderthal and maybe some Denisovan. It looks like the Cheddar man is the result of hybridization between the African and the Neanderthal/Denisovan, a few generations removed. It was from hybrids like Cheddar man that the various peoples ("whites") of Europe evolved, fascinating! The fact that the first modern Europeans were black is giving the r@cists fits, as for the hair, he most likely had dreadlocks. So, white skin in modern man is even younger than we thought, less than 10,000 years old. This definitely makes a lot of sense when all things are considered!

This is silly, there are many African living all over Europe without any issues, and have been living there more than 1000 years!

Look at all the white people crying in the comment section because Cheddar man was dark skin I love it 😂

How are you going to make life if you don't define it?

The sound special effects are distracting and annoying.

There was a dwarf species of mammoths that evolved in the Aleutian islands off Alaska, similarly isolated

'Modern" Europeans are not represented as part of homo sapiens (Africans), 300,000 years ago there were no "modern" Europeans ("whites") in existence. We don't start seeing "white" people until around 12,000 to 6,000 years ago, at the earliest. It strikes me as ironic that Europeans talk about "our" species when referring to homo sapiens entering Europe 50,000 to 70,000 years ago. There were no modern European (whites) in existence when homo sapiens (Africans) left Africa, and there were no modern Europeans in existence when Africans (homo sapiens) entered Europe. Modern Europeans were Africans for at least 50,000 years before modern "white" Europeans came on the scene, those are the unvarnished facts that these so-called scientists never make clear!

The earliest homo sapien is probably more than 1.5 million years old, this will become apparent once the European academic obfuscation is removed!

First off Lucy did not walk like that, she was strongly arboreally adapted (abducted big toe, long curved fingers, semi-vertical shoulder-blades, etc) so she mostly waded when she walked, and walked bent-kneed bowed-hipped(like a chimpanzee) if she actually walked on land, because she was a proto-gorilla herbivorous sedge-root (rhizome) muncher, in the swamps and wetlands of the East African Rift....her larger cousin Australopithecus boisei became the far more arboreal Gorilla species, as the Pleistocene progressed. Wake up, you paradigm-driven yes-men: CHARLES DARWIN WARNED US NOT TO EXPECT OUR ANCESTORS TO HAVE RESEMBLED ANYTHING LIKE PRESENT DAY APES BACK IN 1872!!!!!!. Science becomes just another religion unless it stays aware of the evidence....I REFER TO THE 6.05 MYA TRACHILOS CRETIAN SEASHORE FOOTPINTS < OK??? WAKE UP< YOU IDJITS!!!

40:10 since it is harder to live at higher latitudes, requires more knowledge and technology, more brains to succeed, then could that drive evolution by selecting for the 'smarter' in early Eurasian homo populations?

37:02 we see those big-bladed hip bones in many Africans today, that is interesting.

17:46 if Erectus was at high altitude in China then how to they relate to Denisovians whom we know had genetic adaptation to low oxygen/high altitude

14:16 since Homo Erectus was in Eurasia 1.8 million years ago and that they are a direct ancestor to both Homo Sapiens and Neanderthals then doesn't that speak against the Out of Africa hypothesis in terms of the claim that Homo Sapiens first evolved and only evolved in East Africa?

32:25 question: the other apes share common ancestors with Homo Sapiens, apes have pink-white skin under their dark fur. Our ancestors were hairy. Does it not then follow that as we lost hair we became darker in the tropics, but Homo Sapiens sapiens left Africa over 150,000 years ago, maybe more. Why is the assumption that we came from black like Bantu people? Doesnt make sense.

25:43 why have they made him so black? There isn't enough understanding and certainty to make him so dark, so why? Have they made him as black as the data suggests that he could possibly be? What would possess them to do that? It has caused much confusion, we have many now who think that black sub-saharan Africans have been in Great Britain throughout the Holocene.

14:00 can be be sure that Neanderthals weren't in Great Britain too? Eating people

Hi from 2024 I keep seeing two things related to this: 1 that Cheddar Man wae black 2 that there has been no continuous population of Great Britain but that the descents of Cheddar Man live in the area today. Can anybody please explain?