IFR Mock Checkride with
Vložit
- čas přidán 11. 06. 2024
- 🛫 IFR Mock Checkride Madness with @KimEngineers! 🛫
Ever wondered what it takes to ace an IFR checkride? Join me, CheesePilot, as I team up with the brilliant @KimEngineers, an aeronautical engineer extraordinaire known for her awesome content on TikTok, Instagram, and CZcams! Together, we navigate the skies and the intricacies of Instrument Flight Rules in this thrilling mock checkride.
🎥 In This Video:
- Step-by-step IFR procedures and tips
- Real-time troubleshooting and decision-making
- Hilarious moments and bloopers (because no flight is complete without a little turbulence)
- Expert insights from @KimEngineers on the engineering marvels behind IFR navigation
📱 Follow @KimEngineers:
- TikTok: [@KimEngineers]( / kimengineers )
- Instagram: [@KimEngineers]( / kimengineers )
- CZcams: [@KimEngineers](czcams.com/channels/men.html...)
✈️ Whether you're a seasoned pilot or an aviation enthusiast, this video is packed with valuable information and a healthy dose of fun. Buckle up and enjoy the ride!
👍Like, Comment, and Subscribe for more high-flying content!
#IFRCheckride #Aviation #CheesePilot #KimEngineers #FlightTraining #AviationFun #InstrumentFlightRules #AeroEngineering #PilotLife
---
Remember, even in the cockpit, keep it cheesy and keep soaring! 🚀🧀
Need a boost in your aviation training? 🚀 Head over to TrainingWithCheese.com to schedule a mock check ride or tutoring session! We've got the expertise to help you ace those flights. Whether you're looking for a practice run or some top-notch tutoring, we’ve got your back.
Worried about being on camera? No problem! Not everyone has to be recorded. Rest assured, any student featured in our videos has given their thumbs up to be recorded and shared. Your privacy is always our priority! 🛫🧀
Fly high, stay cheesy, and happy flying!
But that's not all, my friends. Join me on my other social adventures:
👉 Twitch: / cheezepilot
👉 TikTok: / cheesepilot
👉 Instagram: / cheesepilot
#AviationTraining #MockCheckRide #CheesePilot #Tutoring #TrainingWithCheese #Aviation #AviationLife #PilotLife #Flying #AviationLovers #AviationGeek #AvGeek #Aircraft #Planes #Flight #FlyingHigh #AviationPhotography #Airplane #AviationDaily - Hry
Lower pressure in cabin. Fast moving air around the fuselage, due to Bernoulli's Principle, pulls air out of the fuselage thereby decreasing the pressure. When using the alternate static source, You should see a momentary climb of ~100fpm and about 20-40 feet high in altitude, depending on how fast you are moving. (A Bonanza would probably show a higher altitude than a Sky Hawk, due to the increased IAS).
Thanks for the correction
Nice video! More IFR mock checkrides please 🙏🏼
At 1:29:30, the MRA of 4500 applies only to reception of the VOR whose cross radial is used to identify the intersection marked with the “R” flag; it does not apply to reception of the VORs used to track the airway.
Training out of falcon field in mesa. I appreciate this content !
Fantastic video, I’m not even half an hour in but this format is great, explanation of the answer is not known or wrong.
Finished whole video now, was great, I’ll watch more of your instrument videos if you have more, but you should go a little more in depth on weather atleast a little bit in future instrument checkrides.
A velcro stopwatch would technically be permanent equipment but because it's not STC then it's not legal
When will we see a mock commercial? Great content
I think there is a few up already
I will give a hot take on the deflection scale discussion at 59:30. I don't have any references, and I am basically pulling it out of thin air, so there is that.
The most common traditional approach procedures have angular lateral deviation scales, e.g. LOC, VOR, NDB. At some point we became able to get LNAV guidance, and the obvious display choice was absolute cross-track-error.
Likewise, the obvious choice for vertical deviation (BARO-V/NAV) was the difference, 'in feet', from your calculated nominal path.
It turns out (easier to notice in hindsight for sure) that it is difficult to design a safe LNAV approach procedure with low MDA. It is reasonable to design approaches, such that an aircraft can safely go-around when reaching half-scale CDI deflection, say. The thing is on an ILS approach, established on approach close to the ground implies close to the runway, which in turn means a narrow CDI full-scale (or half-scale) deflection in absolute cross-track distance. Not necessarily so with LNAV. That means a go-around might begin from a relatively awkward off-track position when flying LNAV. In a nut-shell, it turns out the traditional ILS approach design was better than we maybe realized.
To get the best from both worlds (angular scale and absolute scale) the LP guidance can be made so that at long distances it behaves like LNAV (absolute scale, so as to not become too wide), during final approach it is angular, and then somewhere nearer the threshold it again uses absolute scale.
You may want ensure that you can fly the LPV vertical profile at least as precise as LNAV/VNAV. Therefore full scale deflection for LPV should not grow (too far) beyond that of a comparable LNAV/VNAV approach, which means LPV vertical guidance probably should be absolute at long distances too, just like the LP lateral guidance.
So, to have the best of both worlds then, both lateral and vertical guidance should use angular scales for the final approach proper, but linear guidance may be better usable at the very far end and the extremely close end of the approach path. That might be the explanation why so few people are willing to confidently say angular or linear, as the truth may actually be "both".
edit: added "(too far)" to soften statement about LPV vertical scale.
SFO, IAH and EWR have several GLS/GBAS approaches. I think United has invested a lot in them
When pulling The Alternate Static Source the pressure inside the flight deck is lower to the pressure outside so it is like you're flying at a higher altitude because the pressure will be lower I believe correct me if I'm m wrong
I've always thought the pressure in the cabin is slightly higher since you have more air getting into the cabin through things like ram air vents than getting out through things like door seals
Pressure inside the cabin is higher due to venturi effect.
The air along the fuselage (and static port) is moving at a high velocity, which creates a low pressure. Think Bernoulli’s.
The written test says lower pressure inside and higher altitude also small change in the vsi before it returns to 0
@@danielreuter2565 oh thanks for the correction
@@jonathanmeikle9773Phak says it is lower page 8-3
Hello all!!!!
Well, LORAN might be back again some time (as eLORAN).
Edit: Also, I am pretty sure that you can get, or at least used to be able to get, ADF and DME integrated in your Garmin G1000.
Yeah you can integrate it I knew I flew a c172 with @und that had adf
What app are y’all talking about?
i use garmin pilot but she is talking about flightplango www.fltplan.com/
I think it was the FAR AIM app
Oh yeah we were talking about that too
The app is goated, its called like far/aim. It $10, always is updated. And you can hightlight and bookmark
Can she log actual IFR time without having the rating?
Yep is it's received as part of training
A VFR pilot flying alone can log actual time if they're navigating solely in reference to instruments in VFR weather conditions, like for instance a moonless night in the desert. See the 1984 Carr letter.
You don't need an instrument rating to legally log actual instrument time.
I never post negative comments on videos but for this one I can't just ignore and move on...
When I first saw the duration of this video, I thought it'd be great and one of the most complete IFR mock checkride videos out there. Unfortunately, that's far from being the case, very poor video, lacks lots of subjects (like weather, to mention one of the most important ones). A lot of time was wasted by adding side stories that are only funny for the owner of the channel.
With a video this long, you missed the opportunity of doing something remarkable. Instead, you made one of the most mediocre videos for IFR mock checkride. I hope you come up with something better in the future, and I hope even more that IFR students who are about to get their checkride done (like myself) don't use this video as a reference for what an actual IFR checkride is.
Thanks for the feedback any other details you think I should have added?
as for weather by this point the student should already have a solid grasp on weather as its part of their private pilot check ride. czcams.com/video/s0eNAc92s2s/video.html this one might be more your vibe if your looking for more question an answer. sorry that this didnt meet up to your standards
@@cheesepilotweather is an extremely important part of flying IFR and DPEs are always going to be asking questions about it on an instrument ride. Especially things that you are far more likely to encounter in instrument flying than visual. Things like icing and de/anti-icing equipment, embedded thunderstorms, limitations of FIS-B radar.
Saying that "they should know that from private" when referring to one of the most important topics for IFR flight is frankly ridiculous.
The rest of the video was great and I really enjoyed it but this argument doesn't pass the sniff test.