my 67 had double glazing in the side windows, so after my 182 it was much quieter, plus the wiing diehedral much more stable. With 2 people on board I could go anywhere I took the 182. Tas 165kts at 8000 ft. I loved it. Flight planed 55lph never burnt that much.
I'm not sure of the timing but... at some point, a couple yrs ago it went through Farmington, MO. It lived there for a while so I had some time in it. It flies great and I thought seriously about buying it. Prob should have.
@@NotTelling51 I will be working on my pilots license before too long, and I hope to hunt it down eventually. It may just be a dream though, with how prices are going
You're a first rate salesman Mark.. you excel at showing an airplane, as tho they were in your personal collection. The 210 and Cessnas other high wing retractables look so clean in the air.. my high performance checkride was in the 182 RG. Benton airfield, Redding. Very nice ride.
Thanks again Mark, absolutely love these informative videos. In Australia (under CASA) we call an aircraft mechanic a LAME (licensed aircraft maintenance engineer). Would be interesting to know more of your background
Mark, your E model in this video is a 1965 model! The '64 was a D model and has quite a few differences from an E, even tho both share the IO-520. E is more desirable. Also the '67 AND '68 model have the cantilever, high dihedral wing, not just the '67 as you had stated. The 1969 mode lost some dihedral and the "chin" and the 1970 K-model had the longer window and baggage door moved.
I really enjoy your in depth walk arounds of different airplanes. Your head must be spinning trying to keep track of all the detail changes over various year...😃. I just subscribed.....
Glad to see you Saturday at Lincoln fuel pump. We ended up leaving the 172 in Juan’s hangar and flew home commercial Sunday due to upcoming weather Rick
As another commenter indicated, the E model was 1965. That person also mentioned several significant differences between the D and E models. The only differences I am aware of, the D model originally came with a generator instead of the alternator equipped on the E model. Many of those have been retrofitted with alternators over the years. The D model has a Vernier throttle, and a slight change In propellor shaft length happened in 1965 to accommodate the slightly modified cowling. That is all I am aware of in the way of differences. The 1964 does have electric flaps. Hydraulics are only for gear operation. 64-66 birds are quite special in my opinion.
Thought the '67 and '68 had the "big" dihedral. I just remember the '69 was better looking, with the flatter wings and no more "chin." Of course, the oil pan was made smaller (less capacity) so that the nosewheel could be raised higher inside the cowling-- eliminating the chin. Good video!
As always great video Mark. Quick question, you mentioned that a 64-66 NA 210 will cruise around 155 @ 12gph. Are there any significant gains in speed/efficiency on the strutless models and again with the tube landing gear models?
Thanks Mark. Any insights on the difference between the hydraulic systems of the various 210 years? And what was on the back of the front seats on the 64? Is that a restraint system of some kind?
We got some complaints about the opening, so we dropped it. I'll put out a short video and ask for a vote. Will that work for you? We don't want you to go! - Don the camera guy
my 67 had double glazing in the side windows, so after my 182 it was much quieter, plus the wiing diehedral much more stable. With 2 people on board I could go anywhere I took the 182. Tas 165kts at 8000 ft. I loved it. Flight planed 55lph never burnt that much.
Those planes are great planes.
N1967V was the airplane of my childhood! My family got rid of it in 2017 I believe. I’m grateful to be able to get a walk around again!
I'm not sure of the timing but... at some point, a couple yrs ago it went through Farmington, MO. It lived there for a while so I had some time in it. It flies great and I thought seriously about buying it. Prob should have.
@@NotTelling51 I will be working on my pilots license before too long, and I hope to hunt it down eventually. It may just be a dream though, with how prices are going
You're a first rate salesman Mark.. you excel at showing an airplane, as tho they were in your personal collection. The 210 and Cessnas other high wing retractables look so clean in the air.. my high performance checkride was in the 182 RG. Benton airfield, Redding. Very nice ride.
Great video Mark! Surprised it took so long for someone to make a video about these aircraft. Great information. Love my 64 210D!
I was almost the first one to review another fact-rich and excellent video. Thanks for your efforts!
My Dad had a Centurion Turbo 210 but then traded it in for a P210. The P210 was the first in Australia. They're all bloody brilliant.
Excellent synopsis of these iconic aircraft. Thanks.
Mark, very informative and interesting gouge on 60’s 210 models. Thanks for making the video!
Thanks again Mark, absolutely love these informative videos. In Australia (under CASA) we call an aircraft mechanic a LAME (licensed aircraft maintenance engineer). Would be interesting to know more of your background
Love your work Mark; it my flying era : ‘63 - ‘73.
Our 2 blade 205 with burnt out muffler baffles used to give me a sick headache…..nasty.
Mark, your E model in this video is a 1965 model! The '64 was a D model and has quite a few differences from an E, even tho both share the IO-520. E is more desirable. Also the '67 AND '68 model have the cantilever, high dihedral wing, not just the '67 as you had stated. The 1969 mode lost some dihedral and the "chin" and the 1970 K-model had the longer window and baggage door moved.
Thanks. That is very specific and helpful.
Excelent information. It allows me to understand much more about those beauty. Thanks Mark
took many trips in a 64 as a passenger, great memories.
I really enjoy your in depth walk arounds of different airplanes. Your head must be spinning trying to keep track of all the detail changes over various year...😃. I just subscribed.....
Thanks Mark always enjoy your videos!!!
Always very well done enjoy your knowledge of all airplanes. Good job…
I enjoy these. Thanks.
210 wing spar AD was a very informative video learned a lot as with video great stuff mark 👍✌
Glad to see you Saturday at Lincoln fuel pump. We ended up leaving the 172 in Juan’s hangar and flew home commercial Sunday due to upcoming weather Rick
As another commenter indicated, the E model was 1965. That person also mentioned several significant differences between the D and E models.
The only differences I am aware of, the D model originally came with a generator instead of the alternator equipped on the E model. Many of those have been retrofitted with alternators over the years.
The D model has a Vernier throttle, and a slight change In propellor shaft length happened in 1965 to accommodate the slightly modified cowling. That is all I am aware of in the way of differences. The 1964 does have electric flaps. Hydraulics are only for gear operation. 64-66 birds are quite special in my opinion.
Thanks. Yes, I said 64 a few times, but that strutted 210 is indeed a 1965 E model.
Cool informative video again : ) Thanks!
Thought the '67 and '68 had the "big" dihedral. I just remember the '69 was better looking, with the flatter wings and no more "chin." Of course, the oil pan was made smaller (less capacity) so that the nosewheel could be raised higher inside the cowling-- eliminating the chin. Good video!
Thanks Mark very useful information and I hope you can find Cessna 207 in the future I would love to have information about it
Wow great and interesting video. I’ve had my eye on 1967V on controller
Glad you enjoyed it!
I had some time in that plane just before the present owner bought it.
Sure like the colors and the scheme on the ‘67.
Subscribed
Great stuff. thanks
As always great video Mark. Quick question, you mentioned that a 64-66 NA 210 will cruise around 155 @ 12gph. Are there any significant gains in speed/efficiency on the strutless models and again with the tube landing gear models?
The strutless one a bit faster.
Mark I love to come out and fly them both
I have some time in 67V. I flew it just before the current owner.
Thanks Mark. Any insights on the difference between the hydraulic systems of the various 210 years?
And what was on the back of the front seats on the 64? Is that a restraint system of some kind?
Believe it or not, it’s an ashtray! And they got lots of use in those days, too.
Looking for a 170, 180, 185, or 210 what is a realistic price point?
That is a very open ended question. It depends on year model, times and condition, equipment and history.
Final thought--Mark you should come up with a franken-turion: Slap the strutted wing on a P-210. Look Ma, no spar AD! Lol
I'm curious...do you know all the stuff you're saying, like, from memory or do you research what you're talking about.
Either way...super impressive!
Mark carries it all in his head. We don't rehearse or have a whiteboard behind the camera. He just wings it (pun intended). - Don the Camera Guy.
@@skywagonuniversity5023 Ya...that's what I figured... man, that's just so very very impressive! Thanks!
Yeah lot of people assume no 210s can have struts
I’m serious! Bring back the intro fanfare or I quit!
We got some complaints about the opening, so we dropped it. I'll put out a short video and ask for a vote. Will that work for you? We don't want you to go! - Don the camera guy
@@skywagonuniversity5023
Just busting chops!
I’m not going to bail on you, I love the content. I learn something every time.
First :)