@@jonnythesilver Oh, I see I was mistaken. Thank you very much. Perhaps I was mistaking them for the unique trebuchets featured in the Saladdin campaign?
Not a single Word generated by an AI, just people typing the words. also, your statement is silly, if no one was painting the portrait, what did you just watch? They had an army of scribes painting portaits, 24 frame per second.
To give you an idea of how big Warwolf was, disassembled it took up 30 wagons, and it took 9 master carpenters and 49 laborers to build it in three months. It could launch a 300 pound stone 200 yards. It was allegedly the largest Trebuchet catapult ever built.
@@YOGI-kb9tg Nah, that would be the German 800 mm Schwerer Gustav double-tracked railway gun made to shell the Maginot Line Ouvrages but instead used for the first and the last time against Sevastopol fortifications.
Ugh no. Stannis is always loyal to Robert. Stannis would starve to death for Robert which was exactly what he and Davos were doing in Dragonstone while Robert was at the height of his rebellion. It's actually more like the other way around. "I'm proud of you Stannis", are words that Robert probably never said to Stannis. Stannis was never the best. Robert had other more talented men following him. Despite his lack of talent Stannis was always going to be counted on to do his best. While Robert always regarded Stannis as dependable, he never quite rewarded Stannis the way he should have. The decision to give Storms End to Renly and Dragonstone to Stannis, genuinely pissed off Stannis. Of course, Stannis being Stannis, he just accepted what Robert asked of him.
@@davetherave2370 Stannis was never cut out to be anything other than Robert's brother. A dependable brother yes but Stannis never had the potential to be great. Robert, on the other hand, had potential. Robert is often unfairly criticize by the man he became rather than the man he could have been. The Navajo or the Shoshone (I forget) have a phrase about men losing their shadow. When men lose their direction in life and become shells of their former selves, they are said to have lost their shadow. That's exactly what happened to Robert when he lost Lyanna. Personally, I thought Robert was a decent enough King for Westeros. He had Littlefinger and Varys to run the kingdom. The only mistake I think Robert made was not appointing Tywin as Hand. Tywin and Robert would have been a perfect fit. Each had what the other lacked. Robert had the charisma and the love of the people, while Tywin actually had the makings of the best Hand of the King if he wasn't so damn unpopular with the common folk.
@@bobofthestorm Stannis would have took being king more seriously all Robert did was drink whore and host tourneys and bankrupt the realm to the Iron Bank
It was actually Jon Arryn and Stannis who ran the kingdom while Robert whored around. In fact, I think Stannis was also pissed when he wasn't named hand of the king after Jon's death. He would've made a good king, he was just, battle-proven, genius, strong, etc. even Little Finger didn't want Stannis as a king because he would be incorruptible and Pyter/Varys might've -would- been executed at the first sign of treason he committed. And we also have to consider the 3 invasions The Seven Kingdoms would confront, Tommen is to weak and Cersei's an idiot. Who's better fitted to rule? In the books at least.
@Old Scottish Glory It's kinda hard to bullshit when the castle itself was destroyed by it, the survivors recount it, and he done it in front of a audience, including an army, along with ordering materials to built it. I think you just, probably, don't read history books and like trying to be contrarian for the sake of it.
@Old Scottish Glory The people who were there. The rebuilt Frankenstein structure of Sterling Castle, the diagrams and designs of Warwofl, the whole "Scottish War Of Independence" that involved entire armies. Jesus fucking Christ. ,
Fun fact: Warwolf, built by England, was the biggest trebuchet ever built in history. It is not until a couple years ago that the record was broken... also by England.
@Lord Simpleton The trebuchet was the most common siege engine used during the Hundred Years' War; unfortunately though the word Trebuchet is itself a French word
Lmao the English patting themselves on the back when there were other, stronger nations still standing in the rest of Europe and the middle east. The Warwolf and other English trebuchets are the largest ones known because the English society continues to this day so their history is preserved. There were other stronger nations back then but their history isn't preserved completely because they ended up being destroyed or just lost the knowledge.
@@zippyparakeet1074 What nations are you talking about? You're telling me there was entire European kingdoms during the middle ages that left no historical record??If they are so great then why did they lose the knowledge?
ᚲᚨᚢᛚᛞᚱᛟᚾ ᛃᛟᛏᛁ Yes! Been practicing Older Furhak for some weeks glad to see im doing it the right way xD Btw how did you write with Runes? Is it on pc Or can you possibly write it on a phone aswell?
@@hitrapperandartistdababy I've been using it since I was a kid! During exams, my cheat sheets were in futhark and teachers had no idea! :D I don't quite remember what exactly I used, but I think it was one of those online converters, then I just pasted the runes to my google account name and there it was! virtualkeyboard.biz/elder-futhark
Something you’d hardly notice with this gigantic trebuchet, is that Edward is wearing armor. Not just a padded shirt or anything, no, I mean armor. Now you could say it’s because of the siege, but it’s actually quite historically accurate. Edward loved wearing armor. There are stories of him wearing it as his normal day to day clothing, and looking around the rest of the siege camp, he really is the only ‘civilian’ wearing armor.
The only people present in this scene who can be considered "civilians" are the women. Nobles were the opposite of civilians. In fact, medieval society specifically referred to the upper class of gentry as "those who fight"
There was no clear distinction between military and civilian government in these times. Offshoots of one of the most violent periods in human history, these successor states were all heavily militarized societies. You wouldn't be allowed to govern if you had no military training or experience
Man I loved this movie but it went by so fast. Should have been a 10 part series or something. Like they have these great character setups and then the movie just has to end.
IvO09 wow you are pretty fucking stupid. What the fuck does the population of the earth have to do with what i said. I said no one agrees with you or your shit negative opinion then you bring up the earths population as if everyone in the universe has seen it and just because they didnt thumbs up this video they agree with you ?? hahahaha use your brain, it aint there for nothing. Then you bring up "Lord of the rings" and refer to it as a "good movie" - More proof of your stupidity "Lord of the rings" is not a single movie, it is the title of a trilogy of movies as a collective that includes "the fellowship of the ring", "the two towers" and "the return of the king" All 3 of which are are among the best if not the best movies of all time so for you to call it "good" is pretty much an insult and for your standard of just "good" to be lord of the fucking rings does thaf mean all but 10 movies ever created are "trash" because in my opinion all 3 are in the top 10 of all time. Outlaw king was a good movie. Pull your head out of your ass, you be talking too much shit.
@@leonardoflorentin I just assumed they were all speaking French and this was the translation. Scotland did after all have a French phase too. That's how you got the Stuart Dynasty.
@@Valencetheshireman927 if he was from a noble english family then 100% he was normand descendant, because the nobility of england at that time was normand.
@The Law one question: we know show version of stannis died but the book version may have a similar death but no brienne. Stannis if he dies in battle then it be less poetic. If stannis died being backstabbed it be poetic like how his priestess used the shadow to assassinate Renly.
@Classic this is only small part of the scene. The entire scene is actually 8 minutes in one take, and it even involves a sword fight. Hell yeah that's hard. One mistake and all actors would have to redo everything.
@Classicwtf do you mean? What, background actors can't make mistakes lol? Everyone can make a mistake. Sometimes background actors can ruin the shot, be where they aren't supposed to be and so on and so forth. Sword fight is especially the hardest part for actors, as they should be still able to remember their lines and stay in character, remember the choreography, and continue acting or everything will start over. This is much harder than theatre, because people don't care about small mistakes in stages, and they don't have as much people to direct, and they don't have much choreography put on action scenes. You see theatre acts bit further away, so you will be more focused on overall picture than small details. Movies though, every mistake counts, because people can notice it, actors should be able to stay in character all the time, because smallest character breaking moments can ruin the experience. Undermining scenes, where so much effort was put in by everyone, is really a delusional thing to do.
Everybody in the comments mentioning Stannis, but can't you guys See Lord Commander Jeor Mormont at 1:37, he also had a part in Braveheart the supposed prequel which is nice.
Braveheart isnt the prequel to this, braveheart is a terrible inaccurate mel gibson film. Outlaw king was actually reasonable accurate, and a good movie unlike braveheart. If braveheart was similary accurate and well put together and didnt star mel gibson, it would be the prequel. But yes historically wise the plot of outlaw king was shortly after william wallaces death. Braveheart was a shit movie though and shouldnt be associated with this. I cringe just thinking of mel gibson screaming freedom
Love how historically accurate this scene is. The painful truth that the council of Scotland was a mile down the road they just attacked the wrong building( the castle) instead of the meeting
i read somewhere that they basically let everybody flee and that the castle was mostly empty by the time this was fired. they weren't really _trying_ to kill anybody, just show off their might. ...or the other comment I read was wrong and I'm totally spreading misinformation. lol
True, although in reality the artillerymen probably wouldn't let the King anyway near their infernal machine when it was firing. They had to calculate the various stresses involved without benefit of modern calculus or engineering. Ropes could snap and fly around with lethal force. Its one of the reasons siege engines were so rare - very few people understood how they worked or how to make and operate them.
Oh god the kings comment: "It took 3 months to build so I didnt want to waste it." The tone of the actors voice, the face, it all came together masterfully. HAHAHHAAH!
This has got to be one of the best scenes in cinematic history. Outlaw King is a severely underrated film. Chris Pine played Robert the Bruce perfectly.
No. Robert was an ugly short man with bad temper. Nobody goes armed to a place where weapons are forbiden without second intentios, and Robert did. Killing the guy on the church was simple and calculated murder. Robert was a blood thirsty guy, unlike the caracter portraid by Cris.
ultra late reply, but I finally watched this on netflix and realized that it is to show that he didn't realize he was ill, until later in the film when he speaks to his council and says "I slipped this morning..."
King:SURRENDER OR BEHOLD THE WARWOLF!!!! Defenders:We surrender! King:WAIT...WHAT...But...But...My trebuchet....It took 3 month to build it and I wanna try it out....Shoot at them!!! Defenders:wtf...
It would be actually kind of odd to find out if the Japanese actually wanted unconditional surrender but the US wanted to test their two atomic bombs first before accepting their surrender.
@A1 "waited till it was built, then decided to surrender just to be troublesome." Well, that was perfectly legitimate by the rules of medieval war. There were only thirty men defending the castle. After it surrendered, Edward had one man executed (an Englishman who had swapped sides), sent the commander to prison in London (he was later released) and let the rest go. Very civilized by medieval standards. Later he wouldn't be so reasonable, but at this stage he thought Scotland wasn't going to be anymore trouble.
After watching this I expected the battles to be filmed in one take like the revenant, the battles were still top notch and realistic but long takes are just so good.
One of my favorite scenes ever is the entire intro to this movie, all the way from the first second of the film to the end of this very scene is a single long tale that creates so much tension, atmosphere, characterization and reveals context without any exposition, it’s an absolutely brilliant piece of cinema
@@seanwalters1977 Agreed. Actually, it was supposed to be longer, but after the first screenings David MacKenzie felt the need to shave off 22 minutes. It would be cool if they released a director's cut.
For those wondering why it took 3 months to build this… this beast was estimated to be between 22-30 stories tall and threw 300lb projectiles. In other words, they built a high rise that throws engine blocks filled with medieval napalm at people. Apparently it actually demolished the wall it hit. I bet it was a hell of a sight.
I love how in this movie you could identify characters through their coats of arms. I wish more medieval movies weren't so afraid of color. The King with Timothy Chalamet was disappointingly grey.
@@qwopiretyu The King was still a very good movie but these two are quite different, Outlaw King mainly striving for historical accuracy while The King is based more off of a play, yet is still quite a real depiction of medieval life
@@geechyguy3441 The King is completely unrealistic. It's portrayal of the French and the battle of Agincourt, specifically, are laughable. It also boggles the mind that they made Henry V, a 30 years old veteran, look like a zoomer twink.
"They all tried to surrender 2 days ago, Edward refused to accpet" Edward: "We spent 3 months building this fucking trebuchet, were gonna fucking USE this trebuchet!!!!"
I'm always a fan of King's that are capable of respect and mercy. "I'm proud of you, Robert. You had the courage to stand up to me... and the wisdom to stand down."
Interesting historical note about Stirling Castle. The Scottish flag flew over it uninterrupted for centuries except for one night. A Canadian private high school was holding their graduation ceremony in the castle and sometime during the night some of the students took down the St Andrews Cross and put up the Maple Leaf.
A great scene to drink in the detail. Despite the look of awe on Bruce’s face while Edward is intimidating them, I feel the film is hinting at his cunning. That he’s already noting castles were obsolete and that he could never match English technology and military strength but that it can also be slow to manifest. Once he realised chivalry meant nothing to the English after Methven and adopted guerilla war tactics, he’d start burning down castles himself.
Bruce burned down the castles in his rear, in the north of Scotland, so they couldn't be used as a base for rebellion against him. He didn't burn Stirling, or Edinburgh, or Berwick or any of the castles he needed to defend against the English. Methven didn't show a lack of chivalry - Aymer de Valance was one of the most chivalrous knights of his time, often disobeying royal orders if he considered them wrong. He was within his rights to make a night attack. But I agree that Bruce learned from the experience. He also learned from Dalrigh (after Methven) when his forces were almost wiped out by a McDougall ambush.
@@daldan66 Valence agreed on a single combat with Bruce the next day at noon, but he did not give any undertaking not to fight in the meantime. Hence why he was fully within his rights to attack in the meantime, in accordance with medieval custom. And why his reputation was unaffected by it.
@@mikem9001 the dragon banner was raised, he even mentions hes using that to his advantage because all codes of chivalry and honor are voided, when he makes the deal with bruce to fight as hes riding away he even says “theyre outlaws man, they have no rights” indicating what hes doing is wrong if done to any other respectable army/leader but because of the dragon banner being raised and them hating scots so much he saw it as an excuse to not be honorable
this one scene reminds me so much of apocalypse now. The immediacy of the violence and the sense of proximity of these giant weapons of war, all while some madman walks around reveling in it
Imagine Dumb and Dumber had done justice to the greatest military commander in Westeros and had him at least bring siege engines to Winterfell. That would have been something.
@@Allegiancy Stannis came to Winterfell from the Wall through the Wolf's Wood. There's a whole land full of trees from which to make siege-engines. And there was no hurry to leave the Wall, why not leave prepared? Think about the situation first.
@@psevdhome You’re right let’s look at the situation. Stannis has several thousand men with him that not only are starving, exhausted, and on the brink of breaking but they’re also trudging through a heavy snowstorm. It takes them nearly 40 days (and counting) to reach Winterfell and they still aren’t there. Now if Stannis were to successfully deal with the Bolton hosts and continue on to siege Winterfell, he’d have to figure out how the siege engines would be leveled on the uneven ground that Winterfell sits upon. Winterfell is strategically far from any resources so Stannis would need to spare days for his forces to bring in wood from the Wolfswood, while also ensuring his stretched supply line isn’t harassed by any enemy. It’s a logistical nightmare and it’s why southern armies have never attempted to besiege it.
@@Allegiancy Quit trying to justify it after the fact. You didn't know which direction he is approaching from. I suggested that the best battle commander should be written at least half competently on the show. Unlike in the book he had no hurry to leave the Wall, because there was no shortage of supplies to feed his men. He also has ne need to grow his armies because he came with mercenaries on the show. Gather supplies before heading to Winterfell and build your engines before setting off from lumber near the Wall. In the books there is also no "uneven" ground at Winterfell you made it up. There is the wolf's wood full of deer (and wolves) that you can eat. Full of lumber to build, and long lake on the way is full of fish. No lack of food. In the book the situation is entirely different since Stannis' army is smaller, so he decides to win the Northerners themselves on his side, that's why he travels the breadth of the North to get more allies and to rally the entire North on his side. But in the book he had to leave because he was dwindling the supplies at the Wall and Winter was coming.
@@psevdhome It’s completely justified regardless because no matter which direction he comes from, he still won’t successfully besiege Winterfell even with siege engines. I simply explained to you how approaching from the Wolfswood wouldn’t change the obvious outcome 🤷♂️. I didn’t make up the “uneven” ground portion as it wouldn’t make sense to not have it that way in the books and only the show. Stannis’ army being smaller in the books makes the situation even worse, it’ll take longer to build the siege engines in such a dreadful condition. Let’s not overlook the negatives I pointed out previously aswell, a worm-out army that now has to besiege a substantial fortress which was specifically made to outlast its attackers- even more so than Storm’s End. On top of that it’s isolated for a reason making the task of sustaining a siege more strenuous for the attackers. YOU should quit trying to act as if Stannis would genuinely attempt a drawn-out siege on Winterfell. Especially book Stannis, he’s way too smart for that.
I imagine this is probably the best depiction of any English King I've ever seen in a movie or show. He looks alot like the drawings of Edward and he exudes very powerful and intimidating energy
Battle of Tours would NEVER happen. It's way to Islamaphobic. Unless you're willing to have a black Charles Martel, that is. Then we might be able to squeeze that'n in.
@@AscentofTrollbane not really the Moors/Abbasids would be the bad guys but that does not mean a film maker can take liberties like say have a black Moor have a vision of the Crusades and try to stop his comrades because it would justify the Reconquesta and the Crusades in the holy land. Drug dealers are always South/ Central American in hollywood and none apart from the most desperate and sensitive see that as offensive because you know Drugs are a problem in the Americas Pablo comes to mind so maybe the left can deal with it but considering modern politics has become as insane as Medieval politics I doubt an accurate representation would show up anytime soon.
Anyone else notice the symbolism used with the candle? It’s alight in the opening shot within the English tent here at Stirling showing the grip of Edward and before the Scots meet the English at Loudoun Hill you see the spider and then Robert praying...as he leaves the tent he blows out the candle symbolising that the English rule within Scotland is starting to crumble. I might be completely wrong but it’s a nice concept! Great movie that deserved far more recognition! I’d love to see a sequel leading up to the two day battle at Bannockburn! Wishful thinking....
Stephen Dillane was perfectly cast in this movie, but the ACT III of the movie blowed. It was an emotionless mud slog. They should have made it into a short series or something, I feel ACT I's great potential were all deflated as the movie continued. ACT II was filled with inconsequential battles and finally ACT III was ahistorical af when it came to the English Prince's involvement.
700 years later and the dynamics in Scotland haven’t changed. The haves celebrate their submissive vassal state while the have nots are mocked and attacked for yearning a brighter independent tomorrow 😢
Bruce submitted to Edward two years before Stirling - he was already married to Elizabeth by the time the siege happened. The main reason - John Comyn was in charge of the Scottish resistance at the turn of the 14th century, and that he could not abide. So he submitted to Edward, then as we saw in 1306, seized his moment. In that, the film was accurate.
"We spent 200 gold and 200 wood to build this. I don't want to waste it."
The BAD Neighbour
@@shamilrafeeque5970 Wasn't warwolf a cheat code as well?
Jokes on you. I just upgraded to elite samurai!
@@VRichardsn the british imperial special tech I believe: Trebuchets deal aoe
@@jonnythesilver Oh, I see I was mistaken. Thank you very much. Perhaps I was mistaking them for the unique trebuchets featured in the Saladdin campaign?
"You had the courage to stand up to me, and the wisdom to stand down"
What a fucking gangster
How's doing Glenn?
Most based English King.
The Hammer of Scots..
movie should have paused and pixel sunglass should have floated down from above.
Nothing awesome, about longshanks, he was a cold blooded killer.
Not a single person painting a portrait. Just people living the moment.
What a century. not like those venetians in the 1500-1600s. ew.
Not a single Word generated by an AI, just people typing the words.
also, your statement is silly, if no one was painting the portrait, what did you just watch? They had an army of scribes painting portaits, 24 frame per second.
@@ylstorage7085 The king turns around to an army of 100,000 scribes furiously painting their 1/24 frame per second.
To give you an idea of how big Warwolf was, disassembled it took up 30 wagons, and it took 9 master carpenters and 49 laborers to build it in three months. It could launch a 300 pound stone 200 yards. It was allegedly the largest Trebuchet catapult ever built.
and still the largest siege weapon ever build
And that 800 Wood and 400 Gold cost...
@@YOGI-kb9tg Nah, that would be the German 800 mm Schwerer Gustav double-tracked railway gun made to shell the Maginot Line Ouvrages but instead used for the first and the last time against Sevastopol fortifications.
I gotta see this movie. Woolooloo
200 yards is not far at all
"Besides... It took 3 months to build! I don't want to waste it!"
War..... War never changes.
3 months, it is a few planks?! King got robbed, should have catapulted the minister of defense responsible for the project instead...
Petr Valek Well ya have to start from the scratch. R&D, design, budget and all that stuff, I'd say three month's good enough.
@@FatGouf in that case,.its quite a lucky shot for the first shot
This was gustav gun of their time, adolf hitler would nod in accaptance.
@@aljosap8445 5 master carpenters and 49 workers.
'I'm proud of you Robert', words Stannis would never say to his brother
Ugh no. Stannis is always loyal to Robert. Stannis would starve to death for Robert which was exactly what he and Davos were doing in Dragonstone while Robert was at the height of his rebellion.
It's actually more like the other way around. "I'm proud of you Stannis", are words that Robert probably never said to Stannis.
Stannis was never the best. Robert had other more talented men following him. Despite his lack of talent Stannis was always going to be counted on to do his best. While Robert always regarded Stannis as dependable, he never quite rewarded Stannis the way he should have. The decision to give Storms End to Renly and Dragonstone to Stannis, genuinely pissed off Stannis. Of course, Stannis being Stannis, he just accepted what Robert asked of him.
@@bobofthestorm Robert should have let Stannis be king of the Seven Kingdoms while Robert warred an whored as a Sellsword in Essos
@@davetherave2370 Stannis was never cut out to be anything other than Robert's brother. A dependable brother yes but Stannis never had the potential to be great.
Robert, on the other hand, had potential. Robert is often unfairly criticize by the man he became rather than the man he could have been. The Navajo or the Shoshone (I forget) have a phrase about men losing their shadow. When men lose their direction in life and become shells of their former selves, they are said to have lost their shadow. That's exactly what happened to Robert when he lost Lyanna.
Personally, I thought Robert was a decent enough King for Westeros. He had Littlefinger and Varys to run the kingdom. The only mistake I think Robert made was not appointing Tywin as Hand. Tywin and Robert would have been a perfect fit. Each had what the other lacked. Robert had the charisma and the love of the people, while Tywin actually had the makings of the best Hand of the King if he wasn't so damn unpopular with the common folk.
@@bobofthestorm Stannis would have took being king more seriously all Robert did was drink whore and host tourneys and bankrupt the realm to the Iron Bank
It was actually Jon Arryn and Stannis who ran the kingdom while Robert whored around. In fact, I think Stannis was also pissed when he wasn't named hand of the king after Jon's death.
He would've made a good king, he was just, battle-proven, genius, strong, etc. even Little Finger didn't want Stannis as a king because he would be incorruptible and Pyter/Varys might've -would- been executed at the first sign of treason he committed.
And we also have to consider the 3 invasions The Seven Kingdoms would confront, Tommen is to weak and Cersei's an idiot. Who's better fitted to rule?
In the books at least.
At least Stannis Baratheon come to siege with siege equipment!
and wildfire
At least there are no 20 goodmen
Please don't remind me how badly his character was raped in the show
Oh fuck I didnt realize it was the same actor lol
@@jonweik4840
In " King Arthur" also he had few little catapults
This 100% happened btw, He won, they surrendered, but he thought it was so awsome he used it anyway lol
Best part is the council of Scotland was a mile away Down the road
@Old Scottish Glory It's kinda hard to bullshit when the castle itself was destroyed by it, the survivors recount it, and he done it in front of a audience, including an army, along with ordering materials to built it.
I think you just, probably, don't read history books and like trying to be contrarian for the sake of it.
@Old Scottish Glory The people who were there. The rebuilt Frankenstein structure of Sterling Castle, the diagrams and designs of Warwofl, the whole "Scottish War Of Independence" that involved entire armies.
Jesus fucking Christ. ,
@Old Scottish Glory Are you so brainlessly nationalistic that you want to deny history and fact because it hurts your feelings? lol
But isn't it like beating a dead horse?
Fun fact: Warwolf, built by England, was the biggest trebuchet ever built in history. It is not until a couple years ago that the record was broken... also by England.
@Lord Simpleton The trebuchet was the most common siege engine used during the Hundred Years' War; unfortunately though the word Trebuchet is itself a French word
Who built a bigger one?
@@maxdavis7722 Some historical chaps who built a slightly larger Warwolf. Was capable of throwing a tractor.
Lmao the English patting themselves on the back when there were other, stronger nations still standing in the rest of Europe and the middle east. The Warwolf and other English trebuchets are the largest ones known because the English society continues to this day so their history is preserved. There were other stronger nations back then but their history isn't preserved completely because they ended up being destroyed or just lost the knowledge.
@@zippyparakeet1074 What nations are you talking about? You're telling me there was entire European kingdoms during the middle ages that left no historical record??If they are so great then why did they lose the knowledge?
This whole one-shot scene was absolutely brilliant!!!!
ᚲᚨᚢᛚᛞᚱᛟᚾ ᛃᛟᛏᛁ Cauldron Joti correct?
@@hitrapperandartistdababy that's right, mate!
ᚲᚨᚢᛚᛞᚱᛟᚾ ᛃᛟᛏᛁ Yes! Been practicing Older Furhak for some weeks glad to see im doing it the right way xD Btw how did you write with Runes? Is it on pc Or can you possibly write it on a phone aswell?
@@hitrapperandartistdababy I've been using it since I was a kid! During exams, my cheat sheets were in futhark and teachers had no idea! :D
I don't quite remember what exactly I used, but I think it was one of those online converters, then I just pasted the runes to my google account name and there it was!
virtualkeyboard.biz/elder-futhark
ᚲᚨᚢᛚᛞᚱᛟᚾ ᛃᛟᛏᛁ Haha Nice! Dead language or not still usefull in our world ;p
Thanks will definetively try it out!
Something you’d hardly notice with this gigantic trebuchet, is that Edward is wearing armor. Not just a padded shirt or anything, no, I mean armor. Now you could say it’s because of the siege, but it’s actually quite historically accurate. Edward loved wearing armor. There are stories of him wearing it as his normal day to day clothing, and looking around the rest of the siege camp, he really is the only ‘civilian’ wearing armor.
in Braveheart is the same
The only people present in this scene who can be considered "civilians" are the women. Nobles were the opposite of civilians. In fact, medieval society specifically referred to the upper class of gentry as "those who fight"
@@CodaMissionExactly. No idea how you can refer to him as a civilian, he’s literally the campaign commander.
@@CodaMission yea, and most of the women in this scene are very clearly among the highest ladies, if not princesses
There was no clear distinction between military and civilian government in these times. Offshoots of one of the most violent periods in human history, these successor states were all heavily militarized societies. You wouldn't be allowed to govern if you had no military training or experience
Man I loved this movie but it went by so fast. Should have been a 10 part series or something. Like they have these great character setups and then the movie just has to end.
IvO09 Literally noone agrees with you or your sht comment. Not one person but you has negative view on this movie.
the only thing bad was the ending dual... other then that it was a good movie
IvO09 wow you are pretty fucking stupid. What the fuck does the population of the earth have to do with what i said. I said no one agrees with you or your shit negative opinion then you bring up the earths population as if everyone in the universe has seen it and just because they didnt thumbs up this video they agree with you ?? hahahaha use your brain, it aint there for nothing.
Then you bring up "Lord of the rings" and refer to it as a "good movie" - More proof of your stupidity "Lord of the rings" is not a single movie, it is the title of a trilogy of movies as a collective that includes "the fellowship of the ring", "the two towers" and "the return of the king" All 3 of which are are among the best if not the best movies of all time so for you to call it "good" is pretty much an insult and for your standard of just "good" to be lord of the fucking rings does thaf mean all but 10 movies ever created are "trash" because in my opinion all 3 are in the top 10 of all time. Outlaw king was a good movie.
Pull your head out of your ass, you be talking too much shit.
the teaser trailer gave off the feeling of it being a miniseries, and i wish it was a miniseries. but it was a great movie which i enjoyed
this movie was really bad, seriously. it was just pure boring... i fell asleep over and over almost.
When watching this film, I kept picturing King Edward in my head saying: "The Scots will bend the knee or I will destroy them."
Yeah but he would have said it in french.
@@leonardoflorentin I just assumed they were all speaking French and this was the translation. Scotland did after all have a French phase too. That's how you got the Stuart Dynasty.
@@dragoninthewest1 yeah and Robert was actually DE Bruce not THE Bruce, he himself was half french.
According to a BBC article Robert the Bruce was actually from an English noble family . What source says he was French ?
@@Valencetheshireman927 if he was from a noble english family then 100% he was normand descendant, because the nobility of england at that time was normand.
Stannis has an obsession with fire even while wearing Lannister Colors.
@@HugsmadeDrugs In that order?
@@HugsmadeDrugs Why so rude?
@@apunahasapeemapetilon4398 shrug just pointing out the obvious
Heh, his Targaryen coming through...
Edward the Mannis Longshanks.
I would just like to point out that James Cosmo has been in every Scottish play or movie since 1614.
It's true, I was there back in 1614
It's true, I am those movies
I thought this was an exaggeration but it's really true, I even saw him have a 3 minute role in a very bad and recent Scottish horror movie.
"I shall not forget you, Angus" -Connor Macleod
this should go down in YT comment GOAT history
How the Battle of Winterfell should have been
Stannis Baratheon has Theon hostage and getting information out. He also tricked frey and northern Knights to ice leaks as a battle trap.
@The Law one question: we know show version of stannis died but the book version may have a similar death but no brienne. Stannis if he dies in battle then it be less poetic. If stannis died being backstabbed it be poetic like how his priestess used the shadow to assassinate Renly.
@@Brandonhayhew Felt like they severely cut the budget on the whole season lmao
@@CristeroFanatic its impossible to adapt this franchise. Budget is not enough.
books from Windblown That’s True
Stannis the Mannis being actual king for once
He finally avenge his older brother
He is the actual king, the one true king
Stannis Baratheon, Jeor Mormont, Captain Kirk and Vincent van Cogh on the same battlefield?
Desmond Hume blackfish was also in this movie
Vincent van Cogh 😂😂😂
And young faramir tooo😂
John Lennon as well
Jeor "Fookin" Mormont. Call the man by his title.
Well damn Stanis did take the Iron throne afterall
“The Iron Throne is mine, by rite”
This long take scene is so well directed, David Mackenzie is the man
David Mackenzie's my uncle
@Classic this is only small part of the scene. The entire scene is actually 8 minutes in one take, and it even involves a sword fight. Hell yeah that's hard. One mistake and all actors would have to redo everything.
In the scot language Mackenzie was actually spelt with a letter symbol to y, replacing the letter z and pronouncing like mackenyie.
@Classicwtf do you mean? What, background actors can't make mistakes lol? Everyone can make a mistake. Sometimes background actors can ruin the shot, be where they aren't supposed to be and so on and so forth. Sword fight is especially the hardest part for actors, as they should be still able to remember their lines and stay in character, remember the choreography, and continue acting or everything will start over. This is much harder than theatre, because people don't care about small mistakes in stages, and they don't have as much people to direct, and they don't have much choreography put on action scenes. You see theatre acts bit further away, so you will be more focused on overall picture than small details. Movies though, every mistake counts, because people can notice it, actors should be able to stay in character all the time, because smallest character breaking moments can ruin the experience. Undermining scenes, where so much effort was put in by everyone, is really a delusional thing to do.
@Classic From "theatre uber alles" to mom jokes. Yikes. What a fucking incel.
Everybody in the comments mentioning Stannis, but can't you guys See Lord Commander Jeor Mormont at 1:37, he also had a part in Braveheart the supposed prequel which is nice.
Braveheart isnt the prequel to this, braveheart is a terrible inaccurate mel gibson film. Outlaw king was actually reasonable accurate, and a good movie unlike braveheart. If braveheart was similary accurate and well put together and didnt star mel gibson, it would be the prequel. But yes historically wise the plot of outlaw king was shortly after william wallaces death. Braveheart was a shit movie though and shouldnt be associated with this. I cringe just thinking of mel gibson screaming freedom
@@bandolando3265 That is why I said the "SUPPOSED" prequel did I not?
@@bandolando3265 it's a prequel in that it's set prior to this film. The ending of braveheart overlaps about 15 minutes into this film
BandoLando Historical accuracy doesn’t necessarily make a film better. Alexander was rather accurate, and that’s painfully shit.
@@aceharris1463 I liked Alexander. It wasn't great but it had a lot of interesting visuals and I somewhat enjoyed the plot.
Come with me and take this city!
Karl Tanner from Gin Alley
@@sergiodias8382 I was a legennd in Gin Alley
Fookin ballsacks
Fooking cowards
'Haven't lost a fight since i was nine. You think you're the man? i was fookin Legennd'
Stephen Dilane is just an awesome performer. His potrayal of Stannis is memorable, his take on Longshanks is amazing. Mens a treasure.
Stephen Dillane would be, in my opinion, the absolute best pick to play Julius Caesar in a well made movie about the man.
Love how historically accurate this scene is. The painful truth that the council of Scotland was a mile down the road they just attacked the wrong building( the castle) instead of the meeting
They were meeting a mile to the east in Cambuskenneth Abbey.
i read somewhere that they basically let everybody flee and that the castle was mostly empty by the time this was fired. they weren't really _trying_ to kill anybody, just show off their might.
...or the other comment I read was wrong and I'm totally spreading misinformation. lol
Bald guy didn't even flinch, as the insanely heavy ball of flaming Greek fire is propelled towards the castle. Inches from his head.
mrneutral Must’ve been CGI.
The ball, yes. The fabric that almost bitch slapped him, probably real.
@@roas2 keep telling that to yourself baldie
that guy is probably the stunt supervisor there to see the job done himself.
True, although in reality the artillerymen probably wouldn't let the King anyway near their infernal machine when it was firing. They had to calculate the various stresses involved without benefit of modern calculus or engineering. Ropes could snap and fly around with lethal force. Its one of the reasons siege engines were so rare - very few people understood how they worked or how to make and operate them.
Yeah, I'm awesome.
You're amongst the best kings of England, back when kings were tough.
You also happened to be bad at delegating because your son tried and failed to capture Robert several times
That wasn't very Christian of you
Censor Duck he was also a vile bastard but we shall ignore that for now
You couldn't even speak English
Oh god the kings comment: "It took 3 months to build so I didnt want to waste it." The tone of the actors voice, the face, it all came together masterfully. HAHAHHAAH!
This has got to be one of the best scenes in cinematic history. Outlaw King is a severely underrated film. Chris Pine played Robert the Bruce perfectly.
😂
Congrats on watching your first movie!
No. Robert was an ugly short man with bad temper. Nobody goes armed to a place where weapons are forbiden without second intentios, and Robert did. Killing the guy on the church was simple and calculated murder. Robert was a blood thirsty guy, unlike the caracter portraid by Cris.
chris pine played robert the bruce completely inaccurately
King Stannis wearing a Lannister outfit destroys Highgarden while Jeor Mormont watches. Great movie.
bruh epic 🤣🤣
Using wildfire and naming something after a wolf, and he even has a dragon banner.
There's something weirdly comical about how when the king stands up, he leans on his sword to leverage himself up and it slides out from underneath.
Yea I don’t understand why they couldn’t do another take
@@RestitutorEuropa probably a lot to reset in a long scene for that bit that they figured no losers on CZcams would notice 😛
@@freddieharris3873 I liked the subtle humour/realism in it
That happened because the king was too excited to show friends his new toy.
ultra late reply, but I finally watched this on netflix and realized that it is to show that he didn't realize he was ill, until later in the film when he speaks to his council and says "I slipped this morning..."
King:SURRENDER OR BEHOLD THE WARWOLF!!!!
Defenders:We surrender!
King:WAIT...WHAT...But...But...My trebuchet....It took 3 month to build it and I wanna try it out....Shoot at them!!!
Defenders:wtf...
Can't blame the king for that. The trebuchet looks awesome. Any self-respecting monarch would fire it at least once.
@@someorclad9738 ikr who wouldnt want to fire it
It would be actually kind of odd to find out if the Japanese actually wanted unconditional surrender but the US wanted to test their two atomic bombs first before accepting their surrender.
@A1 Now that's a power move😂
@A1 "waited till it was built, then decided to surrender just to be troublesome." Well, that was perfectly legitimate by the rules of medieval war. There were only thirty men defending the castle. After it surrendered, Edward had one man executed (an Englishman who had swapped sides), sent the commander to prison in London (he was later released) and let the rest go. Very civilized by medieval standards. Later he wouldn't be so reasonable, but at this stage he thought Scotland wasn't going to be anymore trouble.
They could not find a more perfect actor to play Edward I than Stephen Dillane. He was brilliant.
This scene is so well shot, all fluid and from what I can tell one or very minimal takes. Made you feel immersed in the setting.
After watching this I expected the battles to be filmed in one take like the revenant, the battles were still top notch and realistic but long takes are just so good.
This a single take sequence. Its amazingly done. .
Ah, so here we see King Stannis successfully subduing the North at the Siege of Winterfell.
One of my favorite scenes ever is the entire intro to this movie, all the way from the first second of the film to the end of this very scene is a single long tale that creates so much tension, atmosphere, characterization and reveals context without any exposition, it’s an absolutely brilliant piece of cinema
Scotts: "we surrender"
King Edward: "Alright, but first lemme test this monster"
Stannis is proud of Robert for once but you can hear his teeth grinding
Bruce should have offered him a peach.
This movie was very well done on all accounts.
My only issue is that it seemed rushed at times but overall a very good movie! Probably would have been better as a miniseries but still awesome!
@@seanwalters1977 Agreed. Actually, it was supposed to be longer, but after the first screenings David MacKenzie felt the need to shave off 22 minutes. It would be cool if they released a director's cut.
I'm sorry but to make a movie about king Robert Bruce and not include bannockburn is criminal.
The villain had no depth of character, he was written like a school bully
one of the few medieval historical flicks that actually have the protagonist wearing head armor
A weapon so mighty it had an accompanying choir and theme song to go with it.
For those wondering why it took 3 months to build this… this beast was estimated to be between 22-30 stories tall and threw 300lb projectiles. In other words, they built a high rise that throws engine blocks filled with medieval napalm at people. Apparently it actually demolished the wall it hit.
I bet it was a hell of a sight.
How high 😆 🤣
Lmfao 30 stories? Gtfo here, I don't think you even know what that means you absolute cretin.
0:05 Almost slipped with the sword there. Nice save.
I love how in this movie you could identify characters through their coats of arms. I wish more medieval movies weren't so afraid of color. The King with Timothy Chalamet was disappointingly grey.
But still a tour de force, no? I agree washed out colour pallette but a damn fine picture rest of the way round
@@qwopiretyu The King was still a very good movie but these two are quite different, Outlaw King mainly striving for historical accuracy while The King is based more off of a play, yet is still quite a real depiction of medieval life
The court in The King looks fairly accurate, the king's standard is correct.
@@geechyguy3441 The King is completely unrealistic. It's portrayal of the French and the battle of Agincourt, specifically, are laughable. It also boggles the mind that they made Henry V, a 30 years old veteran, look like a zoomer twink.
I came here for the Stannis comments.
It gets old really fast
@@CesarMBazanSaavedra no it don't
I came here for the Jeor Mormont ones.
Me too and it didn’t disappoint lol
"They all tried to surrender 2 days ago, Edward refused to accpet"
Edward: "We spent 3 months building this fucking trebuchet, were gonna fucking USE this trebuchet!!!!"
I'm always a fan of King's that are capable of respect and mercy.
"I'm proud of you, Robert. You had the courage to stand up to me... and the wisdom to stand down."
“I’m proud of you, Robert. You had the courage to stand up to me… and the wisdom to stand down.”
That was *so* gangsta!
Glad to see Stannis Baratheon and Jeor Mormont doing well.
The Stannis Baratheon we deserved
The choir is hilarious, just waiting for the projectile to hit before they burst out in glorious harmony.
honestly if you spent three months building that thing, you'd cheer too as it finally worked.
Interesting historical note about Stirling Castle. The Scottish flag flew over it uninterrupted for centuries except for one night. A Canadian private high school was holding their graduation ceremony in the castle and sometime during the night some of the students took down the St Andrews Cross and put up the Maple Leaf.
Deleted scenes of Stannis attacking High Garden after winning the throne
They would switch sides rather than accepting a siege
So is the sought of based rule we could have expected if Stannis had become king.
The cinematography in this film was beautiful, and the very limited cgi that they used was well done. Most casual watchers couldn’t tell it was there
I knew Stannis would take the throne.
This is how GOT should have ended. Period.
A great scene to drink in the detail. Despite the look of awe on Bruce’s face while Edward is intimidating them, I feel the film is hinting at his cunning. That he’s already noting castles were obsolete and that he could never match English technology and military strength but that it can also be slow to manifest. Once he realised chivalry meant nothing to the English after Methven and adopted guerilla war tactics, he’d start burning down castles himself.
Bruce burned down the castles in his rear, in the north of Scotland, so they couldn't be used as a base for rebellion against him. He didn't burn Stirling, or Edinburgh, or Berwick or any of the castles he needed to defend against the English.
Methven didn't show a lack of chivalry - Aymer de Valance was one of the most chivalrous knights of his time, often disobeying royal orders if he considered them wrong. He was within his rights to make a night attack. But I agree that Bruce learned from the experience. He also learned from Dalrigh (after Methven) when his forces were almost wiped out by a McDougall ambush.
@@mikem9001 it was because valence shook hands and agreed on a single combat with bruce instead of their armies fighting
@@daldan66 Valence agreed on a single combat with Bruce the next day at noon, but he did not give any undertaking not to fight in the meantime. Hence why he was fully within his rights to attack in the meantime, in accordance with medieval custom. And why his reputation was unaffected by it.
@@mikem9001 the dragon banner was raised, he even mentions hes using that to his advantage because all codes of chivalry and honor are voided, when he makes the deal with bruce to fight as hes riding away he even says “theyre outlaws man, they have no rights” indicating what hes doing is wrong if done to any other respectable army/leader but because of the dragon banner being raised and them hating scots so much he saw it as an excuse to not be honorable
@@daldan66 Yes, that's the fantasy shown in the film. I was referring to what actually happened in history. Don't take the film seriously.
this one scene reminds me so much of apocalypse now. The immediacy of the violence and the sense of proximity of these giant weapons of war, all while some madman walks around reveling in it
Imagine Dumb and Dumber had done justice to the greatest military commander in Westeros and had him at least bring siege engines to Winterfell. That would have been something.
Lol siege engines to Winterfell? They wouldn’t even make it through the swamps of the Neck
@@Allegiancy Stannis came to Winterfell from the Wall through the Wolf's Wood. There's a whole land full of trees from which to make siege-engines. And there was no hurry to leave the Wall, why not leave prepared?
Think about the situation first.
@@psevdhome You’re right let’s look at the situation.
Stannis has several thousand men with him that not only are starving, exhausted, and on the brink of breaking but they’re also trudging through a heavy snowstorm. It takes them nearly 40 days (and counting) to reach Winterfell and they still aren’t there. Now if Stannis were to successfully deal with the Bolton hosts and continue on to siege Winterfell, he’d have to figure out how the siege engines would be leveled on the uneven ground that Winterfell sits upon.
Winterfell is strategically far from any resources so Stannis would need to spare days for his forces to bring in wood from the Wolfswood, while also ensuring his stretched supply line isn’t harassed by any enemy.
It’s a logistical nightmare and it’s why southern armies have never attempted to besiege it.
@@Allegiancy Quit trying to justify it after the fact. You didn't know which direction he is approaching from.
I suggested that the best battle commander should be written at least half competently on the show.
Unlike in the book he had no hurry to leave the Wall, because there was no shortage of supplies to feed his men. He also has ne need to grow his armies because he came with mercenaries on the show.
Gather supplies before heading to Winterfell and build your engines before setting off from lumber near the Wall.
In the books there is also no "uneven" ground at Winterfell you made it up. There is the wolf's wood full of deer (and wolves) that you can eat. Full of lumber to build, and long lake on the way is full of fish. No lack of food.
In the book the situation is entirely different since Stannis' army is smaller, so he decides to win the Northerners themselves on his side, that's why he travels the breadth of the North to get more allies and to rally the entire North on his side. But in the book he had to leave because he was dwindling the supplies at the Wall and Winter was coming.
@@psevdhome It’s completely justified regardless because no matter which direction he comes from, he still won’t successfully besiege Winterfell even with siege engines. I simply explained to you how approaching from the Wolfswood wouldn’t change the obvious outcome 🤷♂️.
I didn’t make up the “uneven” ground portion as it wouldn’t make sense to not have it that way in the books and only the show.
Stannis’ army being smaller in the books makes the situation even worse, it’ll take longer to build the siege engines in such a dreadful condition. Let’s not overlook the negatives I pointed out previously aswell, a worm-out army that now has to besiege a substantial fortress which was specifically made to outlast its attackers- even more so than Storm’s End. On top of that it’s isolated for a reason making the task of sustaining a siege more strenuous for the attackers.
YOU should quit trying to act as if Stannis would genuinely attempt a drawn-out siege on Winterfell. Especially book Stannis, he’s way too smart for that.
Stannis! Stannis! STANNIS!
I imagine this is probably the best depiction of any English King I've ever seen in a movie or show. He looks alot like the drawings of Edward and he exudes very powerful and intimidating energy
That line "it took 3 months to build" sounds like something out of Red Letter Media and I fucking love it. Long live Stannis!
Man I miss movies like that. Braveheart, the last king, and this movie have got to be in my top 10.
STAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAANNIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIS
Stannis Baratheon - the true King of Westeros ❤🔥
This bring a smile to my face
"Battle of Tours" and "Battle of Vienna" should be on the next Netflix project
I just wish they'd do Henry V properly.
Battle of Tours would NEVER happen. It's way to Islamaphobic. Unless you're willing to have a black Charles Martel, that is. Then we might be able to squeeze that'n in.
@@AscentofTrollbane not really the Moors/Abbasids would be the bad guys but that does not mean a film maker can take liberties like say have a black Moor have a vision of the Crusades and try to stop his comrades because it would justify the Reconquesta and the Crusades in the holy land.
Drug dealers are always South/ Central American in hollywood and none apart from the most desperate and sensitive see that as offensive because you know Drugs are a problem in the Americas Pablo comes to mind so maybe the left can deal with it but considering modern politics has become as insane as Medieval politics I doubt an accurate representation would show up anytime soon.
Incredible moments in this movie and story. Fantastic battles but nothing will come close to BY THESE SWANS
that music going from the horns into the drums definitely has a modern vibe to it
“We have a spectacle!” Love that line
Surrenders before the Warwolf can be used
“So anyway I started blasting”
"You had the courage to stand up to me... and the wisdom to stand down"
99% game of thrones comments
1% outlaw king comments
you have courage to stand up to me and wisdom to stand down.....powerful words from powerful man
The sound that thing makes is so powerful.
Anyone else notice the symbolism used with the candle? It’s alight in the opening shot within the English tent here at Stirling showing the grip of Edward and before the Scots meet the English at Loudoun Hill you see the spider and then Robert praying...as he leaves the tent he blows out the candle symbolising that the English rule within Scotland is starting to crumble.
I might be completely wrong but it’s a nice concept! Great movie that deserved far more recognition! I’d love to see a sequel leading up to the two day battle at Bannockburn! Wishful thinking....
One continuous shot with no editing or cuts. Truly beautiful!
What an absolutely amazing movie. I've been listening a lot to the soundtrack lately. Will have to watch again soon.
Stephen Dillane was perfectly cast in this movie, but the ACT III of the movie blowed. It was an emotionless mud slog.
They should have made it into a short series or something, I feel ACT I's great potential were all deflated as the movie continued. ACT II was filled with inconsequential battles and finally ACT III was ahistorical af when it came to the English Prince's involvement.
Yeah lol it really starts out with a bang with this sequence and then drops off
I was so immersed on the first time I watched this movie, I remember flinching when that boulder went towards the camera.
If you listen closely, you can hear the screams of the men in the castle but very faintly. Damn.
The Transitions in this movie, this scene in particular are amazing
The Mannis returned.
Love the filming of this Long shot into of OutLawKing ...it’s like something out of Game of Thrones
700 years later and the dynamics in Scotland haven’t changed. The haves celebrate their submissive vassal state while the have nots are mocked and attacked for yearning a brighter independent tomorrow 😢
Stannis and Lord Commander Mormont in the same scene!
Love how the full ignition of the Greek Fire coincided with the King pulling his sword. Maybe Stannis really WAS Lightbringer.
The cinematography is breathtaking!
that trigger system is modified. probably done just to make a big spectacle of the king cutting a rope
This was One of the movie's i'll have been waiting for! Movie inspiration from human history. Already watch..epic and superbly awesome!
Bruce submitted to Edward two years before Stirling - he was already married to Elizabeth by the time the siege happened.
The main reason - John Comyn was in charge of the Scottish resistance at the turn of the 14th century, and that he could not abide.
So he submitted to Edward, then as we saw in 1306, seized his moment. In that, the film was accurate.
The entire movie before this is also in one shot, this movie is incredibly underrated.
If I built something that big, I would like to use it too
For reference, this is the equivalent of the big bad wolf showing up to the brick house with a flak 88
This movie is criminally underrated
-"Probably should lead with that next time"
-"Yeah... but I only have one shot."
_plinnnng!_
Stannis the Mannis with the Plannis is back, baby, yeah!
This scene....just a masterpiece....
The King
Outlaw King
Instant Classics
Stannis the Mannis.
"The English throne is mine by right, all those who deny it are my enemies" - The Mannis
When is some glorious Stannerman going to make a mashup of scenes from this with GoT to give us the proper ending?
I like how Lord Valence doesn't flinch when a trebuchet arm is flying right by him while flaming at more than 100mph.
Balls of steel on that one