TTT363 Juntek PSG9080 AWG Functions and Features

Another fairly recent addition to Arbitrary Waveform Generators to be compared later with a couple of other recent additions.

[@cougar1861]

Thanks, I'm looking forward to the further testing/comparisons you've outlined ... especially with the SDS1032X.

[@felixcat4346]

He said "Duty".

[@jimbert50]

-------------------------
I recently bought a PSG9080 and noticed the output voltage settings did not seem very accurate. Since my most accurate instrument is a 40,000 count DMM, I wanted to check the calibration of the PSG9080 against it. I thought the most accurate way to do this would be to use the DC "waveform" so it wouldn't involve any inaccuracies in measuring RMS of a sine wave. But when I set the PSG9080 to DC, I found that the amplitude control did not change the DC level. I had to use the offset control to change the DC level. I did not like that because the offset setting only has 10 mV resolution rather than the 1 mV resolution of the amplitude control. Have you seen this?

[@williamcolvin3609]

Do you think the Brands Labeled on the FY6900 Units really matter - I have seen FEEL-TECH,FEEL ELECTRONIC,KMOON and other Brand Names marked on the units

[@Giovanni2862]

The noise with 10 mVpp - 20 mVpp is very high

[@KC5CQW]

Does this accept a 10MHz input clock standard?

[@NikiBretschneider]

Is that duty cycle setting common to all modes where setting duty cycle does make sense or not? E.g. if you set duty cycle to 20% in ramp mode, does this also propagate to duty cycle in another modes (like PWM)?

[@tomtektest8042]

I haven't checked all modes but it appears to be common in those I have checked.

[@NikiBretschneider]

@@tomtektest8042 Ok, this behavior makes sense. Thank you for testing this.